Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

During the past half century, the profile of the traditional family has changed dramatically, and today there is great diversity in family constellations. While society has become less discriminatory and more accepting of some nontraditional family types, families headed by sexual minority parents face considerable social, legal, religious, and economic barriers. The assumption and expectation in our society is that all people are inherently heterosexual—this is especially true for parents. Yet, an estimated 4 to 14 million children have gay or lesbian parents. Many individuals hold negative attitudes toward gay and lesbian parenting, and numerous religious, political, and social groups have objected to parenting by sexual minorities.

The rationale for condemning lesbian and gay parenthood is typically based on the assumptions that homosexuals are not fit to be parents because they are mentally ill or because they are pedophiles and sexual predators, and the concern that children with homosexual parents will develop disturbed sexual identities, will be poorly adjusted, and will experience tremendous social stigma. These assertions have been rejected by social science research. In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association officially declared that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, and criminal justice researchers report that there is no evidence that homosexuals are more likely to perpetrate sex offenses than are heterosexuals. Furthermore, there is a substantial body of research that shows parents' sexual orientation has little ability to predict child development (Patterson, 2002). However, while children of lesbian and gay parents develop normal social relationships, the extent of social stigma that children experience remains unclear. What is unquestionable is the fact that sexual minorities are a socially stigmatized group, and that the prejudices against them frequently influence public policy. Public policy can affect the custody rights of gay and lesbian parents, the rights of lesbians and gays to adopt or foster children, and the rights of lesbians and gays to adopt the biological child of a partner.

Research on Community Attitudes

To assess community attitudes toward gay and lesbian parenting, Isaiah Crawford and colleagues conducted several studies that asked adults, such as college students, social workers, and psychologists, to read one of several vignettes describing a couple interested in adopting a child (e.g., Crawford, McLeod, Zamboni, & Jordan, 1999). The vignettes were identical, with the exception of the sexual orientation of the parents. Overall, compared with heterosexual couples, homosexual couples were viewed by college students as less emotionally stable and more likely to create a dangerous environment for children; all types of respondents were ultimately less likely to award custody of the child to a homosexual couple. Using Crawford's vignettes, Shelley-Sireci, Cianooyce, and Deramo (2001) replicated the same pattern of results for individuals who had earned “homophobic” scores on the Index of Homophobia (Hudson & Ricketts, 1980). Interestingly, despite the fact that respondents who earned scores in the “nonhomophobic” range of the Index of Homophobia reported strong support for gay and lesbian parenting on a paper-and-pencil questionnaire, after reading Crawford's vignettes they too were more likely to award custody of a child to heterosexual parents. Hence, preliminary research suggests that many adults are supportive of gay and lesbian parents adopting in theory, but when reading about an “actual” couple and child, they give preference to heterosexual couples.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading