Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In 1991, Fordham University, in New York City, hosted the first National Conference on Graduate Education in Applications of Developmental Science Across the Lifespan, where representatives from organizations throughout the country met to discuss concerns regarding the efficacy of controlled laboratory-based developmental research in meeting the needs of children and families in real-world community contexts (Fisher, Murray, et al., 1993). The consensus of conferees was that the effectiveness of future social programs to treat and prevent developmental problems and optimize human growth rests in large measure on training a new generation of scientist-professionals to work with community members and policymakers to ensure that community goals are achieved (Fisher, Murray, & Sigel, 1996; Lerner & Fisher, 1994; Melton, 1995). Thus began the extension of developmental psychology beyond laboratory settings and into the community to study and solve practical social problems (Fisher, Rau, & Colapietro, 1993).

Educational guidelines were established for training the newly proposed developmental scientist-professionals to work with community groups, practitioners, and policymakers in generating knowledge and creating programs aimed at minimizing developmental risks of children and their families across the life span. These guidelines included the ability (a) to conduct research reflecting real-world issues and problems in the context in which they occur; (b) to develop, administer, and interpret developmentally and culturally fair assessments; (c) to design, implement, and evaluate interventions promoting positive development; and (d) to disseminate information to professionals, organizations, and policymakers involved in child and family welfare. Conference participants also saw field experience as essential to training, allowing students the opportunity to apply acquired knowledge and skills to social problems in real-world contexts. Using these recommendations, the Fordham University doctoral specialization in applied developmental psychology (ADP) was developed to train students in professional psychology with a development-enhancing, risk prevention, scientist-practitioner emphasis.

Fordham University's Applied Developmental Psychology Model

Fordham University's doctoral training in ADP, initiated in 1989 as an applied research program (Fisher et al., 1993), has evolved into a scientist-practitioner model of training professional psychologists who can generate and apply a developmental contextual perspective to problems facing individuals and families. Curriculum planning and program development was the outgrowth of dialogue with practitioners and administrators working in community systems, students in the program, Fordham psychology faculty, and university administrators to ensure that the program's goals matched those of the university.

Through scientific inquiry and practice, students in the Fordham University ADP program gain skills in the design, implementation, and assessment of development-enhancing psychological services. The program draws on the theoretical, scientific, methodological, and practice bases of developmental, clinical, school, and counseling psychology. Within these contexts, students learn to study, prevent, and develop interventions for problems that affect individuals, families, and community systems, such as schools, hospitals, social service organizations, and justice and governmental agencies. The primary goal of this program is to prepare graduates for university teaching, research, consultation, and psychological practice aimed at prevention of developmental delays and disorders, and promotion of positive development across the life span.

A Developmental-Contextual Model for Science and Practice

Fordham's training of scientist-practitioners in ADP assumes that the measure of success of a research program or intervention is based not only on the validity of guiding developmental theory but also on whether the research question or treatment strategy fits with the self-perceived goals and needs of a given community and its service systems (Higgins-D'Alessandro, Fisher, & Hamilton, in press; Fisher et al., 1993; Fisher et al., 1996; Lerner et al., 1996). To this end, students learn the value of engaging community members as ongoing collaborators in research to assist in establishing new ways of enhancing knowledge and building individual and system-based developmental strengths (Higgins-D'Alessandro et al., in press). Within the ADP perspective, science and practice are integrated into a process of colearning, with psychologists and community members playing reciprocal roles as teachers and students. The colearning model has a set of interrelated training goals (see Higgins-D'Alessandro et al., in

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading