Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Family systems theory represents a theoretical orientation in research and practice that is concerned with family structure and functioning as a means of understanding individuals. Since its introduction in the mid-1950s, it has evolved into a largely accepted and highly influential approach to children and families. It proposes that the best interests of individual members, when properly interpreted, are coextensive with those of the family as a whole. Based on the assumption that the best way to understand an individual is to observe that individual in the context of his or her family, this theory offers researchers and clinicians alike a framework for identifying and addressing the best interests of individual family members. In this regard, family systems theory creates a dialectic between research and practice via a shared theoretical framework. By forging the integration of developmental research and practice so that it may inform policy and future practice related to the positive development of children and families, family systems theory is in line with the core tenets of applied developmental science.

Features of Family Systems Theory

Family systems theory emerged from general systems theory (von Bertalanffy, 1968; Weiner, 1948) by scholars who discovered it had many applications to familial and other social systems. While general systems theory has been used as a paradigm for explanation across academic disciplines, family systems theory is specifically useful for understanding family behavior and adjustment. Seminal thinkers, including Bateson, Ackerman, and Haley, were first to adapt certain tenets of general systems theory to the conceptualization and treatment of the family system. Their endeavors were decidedly successful, as systems-oriented perspectives drove much of theory and practice in family therapy by the 1980s. The family systems framework has been used most extensively as a therapeutic paradigm for the assessment and treatment of families (e.g., Kerr & Bowen, 1988; Minuchin, 1974). The family systems framework proposes that the whole, that is, the family, is different from the sum of its parts, that is, the individuals who compose the family. Specifically, this framework focuses on the interdependence, as opposed to the independence, of family members (Klein & White, 1996). The family is depicted as a single emotional unit comprising inter-locking relationships existing across multiple generations. As a result, the framework moves beyond a cause-and-effect interpretation of intrafamily behavior to a more exhaustive understanding of the multiple variables that interact across time to produce conflicts or symptoms.

Two basic elements of systems theory translate into the fundamental elements of family systems theory: recursion and feedback (Klein & White, 1996). Recursion refers to reciprocal causality. A systems perspective is unconcerned with causality between A and B; instead, the focus is on the reciprocal relationship between A and B. In regard to families, meaning is derived from the relationship between individuals and elements as each influences and defines the other. Each family system possesses a complex coherence structure predicated on the interrelatedness of members. Inherent in the systems perspective is the notion that a change in any one family member reverberates throughout the entire family system. “A change to one is a change to all” stands as a central maxim of family systems theory.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading