Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Criminalization of the mentally ill refers to the process whereby individuals with mental disorders are shunted into the criminal justice system instead of being treated within the mental health system (Lamb & Weinberger, 1998; Teplin, 1983). The term “criminalization of mental-disordered behavior” was first used by Abramson in 1972 to describe his observations that persons with mental illness seemed increasingly likely to be arrested for minor crimes (Abramson, 1972).

However, there has since developed some inconsistency over the use of the term (Steury, 1991). It is unclear whether the term criminalization refers only to those mentally ill persons who commit misdemeanors or to those who commit any kind of crime, including serious crime (Lamb & Weinberger, 1998). It is also unclear when the term should be applied: Does it happen at the point of arrest (e.g., Steadman, Cocozza, & Melick, 1978; Teplin, 1984), after prosecution (e.g., Arvanites, 1988; Hochstedler, 1986), or at the point of incarceration (e.g., Steadman & Ribner, 1980)? Finally, studies differ in their definition of mental disorders. The best studies use objective definitions based on symptoms and the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria. Others rely on the police officer's identification of mental disorder, which may skew results.

For this entry, criminalization is defined as applying to those persons with mental illness “who are arrested, with or without jail detention, and prosecuted for minor offenses instead of being placed in the mental health system” (Lamb & Weinberger, 1998).

Changes in the Social Milieu

Three sociocultural factors have set the stage for the criminalization of persons with mental illness (Teplin, 1984): (1) deinstitutionalization, (2) modifications to patients' rights regarding psychiatric treatment and commitment, and (3) insufficient or inaccessible community services. Each has brought mentally ill persons increasingly into the community, where they have come to the attention (and become the responsibility) of law enforcement officials (Teplin, 1983, 1984).

Deinstitutionalization

Within the past 50 years, the emphasis on treating individuals with mental illness has shifted away from long-stay or institutionalized care to community-based care (Lamb & Bachrach, 2001). In 1955, when the number of psychiatric inpatients was at its highest in the United States, 559,000 persons were institutionalized on any given day, out of a total population of 165 million. By 1994, the number of persons institutionalized had been reduced to 72,000, out of a total U.S. population of 250 million (Lamb & Weinberger, 1998). The overall result of deinstitutionalization is that individuals who would have once been committed to long-stay psychiatric hospitals are now increasingly residing within the community (Green, 1997; Lamb & Bachrach, 2001; Teplin, 1983). Due to the paucity of research prior to deinstitutionalization, it is difficult to establish whether increases in the number of mentally ill persons processed in the criminal system are directly related to deinstitutionalization (Lamb & Weinberger, 1998). However, large numbers of mentally ill persons do reside in jails and prisons; long-term hospitalization or institutionalization is no longer available; and clinicians have noted that many of the individuals with mental illness currently in our jails resemble the institutionalized patients of past decades (Lamb & Weinberger, 1998).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading