Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Political Science

In its most basic form, political science can be defined as the study of both the institutions that form states and governments, and the political processes that animate them. The project of systematically examining both normative and positive theories of government and social relationships is an ancient one, dating back at least 3,000 years. Plato, Aristotle, Thucydides, and Machiavelli are all claimed as foundation figures within the discipline of political science. Early political thinkers both inquired as to what ideal political relationships should be (Plato), and sought to describe these relationships as they actually existed (Thucydides and Machiavelli). Both of these lines of questioning can still be found in the discipline today.

While the roots of political inquiry may be old, the modern field is much more recent. Political science as a distinct area of study is only known from the end of the 19th century onwards. Before that the examination of politics was often folded into history. Historian Herbert Baxter Adams (1850–1901) is credited with coining the phrase “political science” in 1880. Adams later founded the Johns Hopkins Studies in Historical and Political Science series. However, it was John William Burgess (1844–1931) who was responsible for founding the first school and graduate faculty of political science at Columbia University, also in 1880. Columbia would dominate this field of study throughout the remainder of the 19th and early 20th centuries.

Structure of the Discipline

In the current era the discipline of political science is divided into a number of loosely defined, often overlapping, subfields based primarily on area of inquiry. The most common of these in American departments are: political theory, comparative politics, international politics and American politics. In the last decade many departments have also added “methodologists” who are tasked with developing formal tools that can be used in any of the areas of the discipline. Departments outside of the United States often substitute the study of their own national politics for the “American” field, (which is then often seen as a highly developed branch of comparative politics). Public policy and public administration are often viewed as applied areas of the discipline.

Of the four main fields, American, comparative, and international relations generally adopt a relatively empirical view of the world, and often seek to construct theories based on the logic of scientific inquiry. Americanists tend to be interested in how a certain set of institutions and social processes (democracy) affect political outcomes in the American context. While this is in some senses the most bounded field in the discipline, it is probably also the most richly developed. Comparativists seek to examine different institutional and social structures and ask how those specific differences condition outcomes. Practitioners of international relations are primarily concerned with the principles that order both political and economic affairs between states and other actors in the international system.

Political theory, in contrast, seeks to construct and interrogate a historical canon of political thought and to more closely investigate ethical and moral questions involving politics, governance, and power. As such, political theory firmly anchors the normative aspect of the discipline. It is also responsible for providing many of the foundational ideas and concepts that are used in other areas' fields.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading