Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Language and Culture

Attempts by linguists and anthropologists to understand humankind have always focused on two areas: culture and society and language and communication. It is somewhat unnatural, however, to separate the study of language from the study of culture, as doing so can limit attempts to characterize the development of peoples and how they create communities and live in societies. Language and are intrinsically related or, as Agar says in Language Shock:

Culture is a conceptual system whose surface appears in the words of people's language.

Culture

In Language and Social Semiotic, author Halliday calls culture a social reality that consists of many interrelated dimensions. A traditional view might characterize culture as a group of people who most likely use the same language, live in the same geographic region, have the same moral and religious value systems, and participate in similar activities. Most researchers would judge this traditional view of culture as incomplete. Just as society is, culture is a complex concept. Anthropologists, linguists, and others have attempted to define culture, but language and communication characteristics are critical to the definition. Individuals do not develop cultures in isolation nor apart from language. Belonging to a culture requires belonging to a group and establishing bonds with members in the group through communication and language interactions. Existing cultures provide the means for individuals to form their personal identities and to make decisions about living, roles, membership, and participation; language is a major player in the development or demise of a culture. It is important to consider the differences between cultures and language use by peoples of the past and cultures and language use that has survived or has developed within current human societies.

Language and its Relationship to Living in Society

Language is more than just a singular component of culture. It is a symbol system that acts as a glue to bind cultures together. Reference to language in relation to most human societies and cultures nearly always involves spoken communication and written language; one notable exception is the culture of deaf individuals, which relies on language that is signed rather than language that is spoken.

The relationship between language, communication, and culture is complex. While language is a powerful and necessary tool to unite individuals in particular cultures, it may act as a barrier or be used to exclude or separate people in a society and within cultures. The author Ben-Rafael, in discussing Zionist immigrants to Israel, explained that, even though these individuals belonged to a common culture, they had migrated from Russia, Poland, and other eastern European countries with varying competencies in languages. Identification with a culture becomes dependent upon prior social context, and the choices of language and language adjustment are not always simple matters.

Members of a Sephardic family who moved from Bulgaria to Israel could speak between two and four languages besides Hebrew, and each member, especially the grandfather, was determined to speak one of the alternative languages to Hebrew at home. We can assume that immersion into Israeli/Hebrew society affected family interactions as well as their perceptions about their language use in society. Ben-Rafael explained that the grandmother criticized her husband for using Bulgarian because it was a non-Jewish language. And the grandchildren preferred English to Hebrew because it would support their future university studies and help them converse with visitors and during travel abroad.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading