Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

India, Philosophies of

The content of Indian philosophy signifies the unbroken philosophical lineage beginning with the Rig Veda (ca. 2000 BCE), flagging one of the oldest continuing philosophical traditions in the history of global culture. This entry summarizes the basic orientations of some of the textual and conceptual regions selected from this vast philosophical history, paying special attention, whenever appropriate, to the anthropological trope of the human person.

The Vedas

The four Vedas, composed by anonymous poets (rishis, or seers) in the context of an oral tradition in the classical Indic language of Sanskrit, collectively constitute the ur texts of Indian civilization in general and Indian philosophical and religious traditions in particular. The four Vedas are called the Rig Veda, the Atharva Veda, the Sama Veda, and the Yajur Veda. The Rig Veda is relatively more important for the later development of the Indian philosophical traditions. The Rig Vedic text, expressed in the form of hymns to the gods, largely voices a polytheistic tradition, where the gods signify the deification of natural elements. Within this universe of hymnal offerings, attesting to the multiple conceptual weavings implicit in the text, a significant philosophical shift can be located between the two sorts of theism:polytheism and kathanotheism, where the former assumes ontological equality between the various gods, whereas the latter, working within a general polytheism, attributes ontological superiority to the particular god to whom a given hymn is being devoted. Going beyond the theistic framework altogether, nested in a famous series of questions, the famous Na-sadι-ya hymn (Hymn to Creation), made the startling claim that the Gods came after the creation of the world, thus robbing theism of its ontological status. Instead of giving a response to the question of how creation arose, the hymn offers a series of questions, professing ignorance regarding the question of cosmic origin. Even the gods do not have an answer to the ultimate ontological question because they themselves were born after creation. In this way, in the narrative of this pivotal hymn, the gods lose their earlier metaphysical status. It is clear that this particular hymn is keen on dismantling Vedic polytheism, making possible for the philosophical redescription of Ultimate Reality. The nontheistic and theistic articulations of ultimate metaphysical reality by the Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita, respectively, provided such redescriptions.

The Upanishads

The Upanishads proposed a nontheistic formulation of the nature of the metaphysical substratum of reality. In the Upanishadic posture, the metaphysical structures of the human person along with the nature of objective world reality were fundamentally thematized. This formulation proceeded to provide one of the most important hermeneutic arcs under which much of the later developments in Indian philosophy would unfold. The Upanishads, collectively naming multiple texts, had as one of its central aim the postulation and elaboration of the concepts of Brahman and Atman.The former points to an underlying metaphysical substance that, unpresentable to everyday cognition, provides the foundation of world presentation to experience. The latter is the underlying reality that allows for the ontological constitution of the empirical self. In other words, in the Upanishadic worldview, an underlying metaphysical substance anchors both the subjective and the objective orders of phenomenal experience. These notions, though transcendent to phenomenally conceived subject and object, categorically do not have any theistic resonance and thus cannot be conflated with the idea of a personal theistic God sustaining the empirical order. Indeed, for the Upanishads, Brahman, the underlying metaphysical substance of the world, is nongendered and cannot be conceived as being invested with a personality. Furthermore, in defining Brahman and Atman negatively as Neti Neti (not this, not that), the Upanishads summon the notion of ineffability by positing that Ultimate Reality escapes the significations of language. The Upanishads also consider the relationship that can possibly obtain between Ultimate Reality construed objectively (Brahman) and subjectively(Atman). In the famous formulation “tattvamasi” (“thou art that”), the nondualist thesis is suggested whereby in the final analysis, the distinction between the subject and the object dissolves at the transempirical, metaphysical level. The issue concerning the relation between these two orders of reality attains central significance in the later philosophical developments of Vedanta, one of the schools of classical Indian philosophy.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading