Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Because of their unique relationship with the federal government, American Indians and Alaska Natives, members of more than 500 federally recognized tribes who live on or near reservations, are entitled to free health services provided by the federal government. However, the federal government considers Indian health care to be a discretionary program rather than an entitlement program, and it determines the level of funding based on political considerations.

There is consistent evidence that health care expenditures for American Indians are substantially less than what is spent on the general population. Federally funded Indian health care is frequently characterized as an “I/T/U” system composed of the Indian Health Service (IHS), Tribal, and Urban components. However, urban Indians, who constitute more than half of the population, are provided with few or no IHS benefits. In fact, both urban and rural American Indians experience health care rationing. Older Indians who are provided “comprehensive” federally funded health services experience rationing through inadequate funding and shortages of personnel, training, facilities, and services, whereas urban Indians over 65 years of age are subject to rationing based on ability to pay.

In general, systematic health status information has been available for only the approximately 60% of the Indian population for which the IHS has responsibility, but the quantity and quality of this information have deteriorated during the past decade.

Mortality

Mortality data for American Indians are subject to three primary sources of error: misclassifications of cause of death, misidentifications of race of decedent, and inaccurate population estimates. Studies have documented that mortality is underestimated by 10% to 21%, especially for those age 65 years and older, urban residents, and those with lower Indian blood quantum.

A number of studies have noted the recent shift in mortality and morbidity from acute and infectious diseases to chronic and degenerative diseases. Despite this trend, far fewer American Indians than Whites live to old age, with 86% of all deaths among Whites, compared with only 59% of all deaths among Indians, occurring among individuals age 55 years and older. Much of this difference is attributable to premature mortality among Indian males from accidents, suicides, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, and homicides. Between 1994 and 1996, only 39% of American Indian male deaths were among those age 65 years and older, compared with 53% of American Indian female deaths.

Based on age-specific mortality rates, a “mortality crossover” occurs during advanced old age, although the precise age has not been established. After 55 years of age, differences in life expectancy between Whites and American Indians are greatest in the younger age groups and for women. Overall, elderly Indian female life expectancy is 20% to 25% longer than that of Indian males.

Slightly more than half of all deaths among American Indians age 65 years and older are attributed to heart disease or cancer, and approximately three quarters of all deaths were the result of the top two causes plus diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Indians in this age group have 20% to 30% lower death rates than do Whites of the same age group from heart disease, cancer, cerebrovascular disease, and COPD. In contrast, older Indians experience higher mortality rates for diabetes mellitus (2.9 times), chronic liver disease and cirrhosis (2.4 times), and nephritis, nephritic syndrome, and nephrosis (1.6 times).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading