Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Duke Longitudinal Studies of Aging, initiated in 1955, consist of two separate studies. The first longitudinal study began in 1955 with 271 persons 60 to 90 years of age. The participants were not a probability sample but rather were selected from a pool of volunteers who lived in Durham, North Carolina. Each panelist came to the Duke Medical Center for a 2-day series of medical, psychiatric, psychological, and social examinations. The examinations were repeated periodically until 1996.

The second longitudinal study, also known as the Adaptation Study, began in 1968 with 502 persons 46 to 70 years of age. These panelists were a probability sample of members of the local health insurance association stratified by age and sex. The study was designed so that at the end of 5 years, there would remain approximately 40 persons in each of 10 5-year age–sex cohorts. This design makes possible various kinds of cross-sequential analyses to separate the effects of age, period, and cohort.

Purposes

The studies focused on “normal aging” in two senses: healthy aging and typical aging. Those persons studied were relatively healthy in that most were ambulatory community residents who were willing and able to come to the Duke Medical Center for tests and examination. The studies focused on more common or typical patterns and problems of aging rather than on abnormalities. The goal was to help distinguish between normal processes of aging and those that may accompany aging because of accident, stress, maladjustment, or disuse.

A second purpose was to use the longitudinal method of repeated observations over time—the best way to measure changes accurately—and the effect of one kind of change on another kind of change. The third purpose was to do as much interdisciplinary analysis as possible.

Themes

The five volumes reporting the results of these studies contain more than 100 specific findings. However, four general themes tie together the findings from several substantive areas.

  • Declining health and physical function. This is the typical pattern of normal aging in most areas.
  • Exceptions to physical decline. Substantial minorities show no decline and may even have improvement in sexual activity, cardiovascular function, hypertension, depression, health ratings, and so on.
  • Little or no decline in social and psychological function. Intelligence, as measured by the usual tests, shows much less decline over time than cross-sectional studies imply. Older adults also maintain their social contacts and do not disengage from their social networks.
  • Wide variations in aging patterns. Individual variation tends to persist or increase with aging.

In summary, the Duke Longitudinal Studies found that normal aging includes many patterns of change, including stability and even improvement.

Erdman B.Palmore

Further Readings and References

BusseEW, MaddoxGL.The Duke Longitudinal Studies of Normal Aging, 1955–1980. New York: Springer; 1985.
PalmoreE, NowlinJ, WangH.Predictors of function among the old-old. J Gerontol. 40244–250. 1985
  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading