Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Traditionally art has been viewed as an exalted form, accessible only to those with high social or economic status. This unambiguous, albeit false, assumption has resonance in the present function of contemporary art. By and large, museums remain reified sites to view privileged objects mostly produced in Europe (or Euro-America). Social historians of art have frequently noted the ethnocentric, gender, and class bias found in most museum collections. In contrast, mural art operates in opposition by allowing community control over public space. Moreover, murals frequently permit the (re)telling of marginalized or oppressed narratives. Unlike easel painting and other fine art techniques, which are entirely about the rarefaction of a single object, the largeness and site-specificity of murals separate them from elite traditions in Western art.

Early in the 20th century, murals, as in situ paintings, began to use their particularity of location as direct political messages to those citizens that frequently encountered them. The most recognized revolutionary use of murals—that is, their inclusion of overt political content—materialized in Mexico in the early 1920s when postrevolutionary Secretary of Education José Vasconcelos hired radical artists, such as Diego Rivera, David Alfaro Siqueiros, and José Clemente Orozco (known as “los tres grandes”), to paint the interior walls of public buildings. These murals, inside state-owned architectural space, allowed the competing views of the working and peasant classes (mostly indigenous and mestiza/o) to intermingle with those of the state. In fact, these revolutionary murals commenced the dialogical process between the regulations of the state apparatus and the desires of the popular classes.

It is this inter-class dialogue, evoked through visual means, that makes mural art so socially engaging and politically important. Following in the footsteps of los tres grandes, murals have played an extraordinary role within global anti-colonial and civil rights movements. In the United States, community murals played an integral part in the black, American Indian, and Chicana/o movements toward self-determination. Artists such as William Walker, Ray Patlán, and Mario Castillo were active in the Midwest, while collectives such as Mujeres Muralistas and Artes Guadalupanes de Aztlán were producing murals in the Southwest. Likewise, muralism and community art-making performed a fundamental function in the 1979 Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua. Many artists demonstrated solidarity for this movement by forming “mural brigades” and traveling to Central America to create public art.

Dylan A. T.Miner

Further Reading

Cockcroft, E., & Barnet-Sánchez, H.(1993). Signs from the heart: California Chicano murals. Venice, CA: Social and Public Art Resource Center.
Cockcroft, E., Weber, J. P., & Cockcroft, J.(1998). Toward a people's art: The contemporary mural movement (
2nd ed.
). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Craven, D.(2002). Art and revolution in Latin America, 1910–1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Híjar Serrano, A.The Latin American left and Diego Rivera's political contribution. Third Text19 (6) 637–646. (2005).
  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading