Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Pierre Bourdieu analyzed and denounced social inequalities and demanded social justice. Bourdieu was born in Denguin, France. He studied philosophy and literature in Paris, Alger, and Lille (1951–1964) before working as a sociologist. His main focus was describing differences in human action through empirical observation of distinctive practices. According to Bourdieu, distinctive practices typify themselves in the expression of personnel preferences and value judgments. In other words, making differentiations locates, positions, determines, and particularizes individuals. It is the difference itself that legitimates the right to have an identity recognized and defended by others. Social reality is defined by difference, which can be summarized as follows: Real life is practical and social because it is relational.

The Relational (Habitus, Capitals, and Fields)

In this context, the word relational expresses the interdependence of social determinations. This interdependence is present everywhere. It can be located in individual behavior, the life of social groups, and the evolution of societies. Bourdieu describes the level of individuality with the concept of habitus or sometimes with habitus of class. Habitus is a structured and structuring ensemble of ways of being and living. Individuals inherit them from the social environment into which they were born, that is, their own class. Bodily and intellectual dispositions (hexis) give individuals their social and cultural identities (ethos), which are markers that direct them in life. Individuals are never born isolated from their social context. They develop conscience through the mediation of a social background that supports their growth. Thus, individuals are not social actors, Bourdieu believed, but rather agents of society.

Heritage relies on four principal resources that Bourdieu called capitals. He distinguished the symbolic (indications of prestige like high-school diplomas), the economic (material richness and means of obtaining it), the social (the network of relatives and friends), and the cultural capital (know-how and savoir-vivre). Each heritage implies a precise volume and structure of capital. The way they take shape depends on their position inside the class system and its corresponding habitus in society. Heritages determine the trajectory of individuals and groups within a society. They reflect the social career of habitus and classes in the various domains of everyday life. Bourdieu defined them as fields.

There are many social fields (e.g., the fields of economics, politics, cultures, religions), each of which is likely to be divided into specialized subfields (e.g., finance within economy, haute couture within fashion). All social fields and their subfields have a relative autonomy, and they are all more or less interdependent. The sum of the social fields is the social space. This space reflects the social allocation of resources in a society according to the various habitus and their classes. It draws a picture of the interdependency between social determinations within a society and of the shapes interdependencies can take according to the point of view of each social class.

The Reproduction of Society

Everyday life is composed of the meeting of different habitus equipped with their capitals in the various fields and subfields of the social space. Bourdieu gives the following formula of practical life in his famous work Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading