Summary
Contents
Subject index
This issues-based reference work (available in both print and electronic formats) shines a spotlight on immigration policy in the United States. The U.S. is a nation of immigrants. Yet while the lofty words enshrined with the Statue of Liberty stand as a source of national pride, the rhetoric and politics surrounding immigration policy all-too-often have proven far less lofty. In reality, the apparently open invitation of Lady Liberty seldom has been without restriction. Throughout our history, impassioned debates about the appropriate scope and nature of such restriction have emerged and mushroomed, among politicians, among scholars of public policy, among the general public. In light of the need to keep students, researchers, and other interested readers informed and up-to-date on status of U.S. immigration policy, this volume uses introductory essays followed by point/counterpoint articles to explore prominent and perennially important debates, providing readers with views on multiple sides of this complex issue. While there are some brief works looking at debates on immigration, as well as some general A-to-Z encyclopedias, we offer more in-depth coverage of a much wider range of themes and issues, thus providing the only fully comprehensive point/counterpoint handbook tackling the issues that political science, history, and sociology majors are asked to explore and to write about as students and that they will grapple with later as policy makers and citizens.
Features & Benefits:
The volume is divided into three sections, each with its own Section Editor: Labor & Economic Debates (Judith Gans), Social & Cultural Debates (Judith Gans), and Political & Legal Debates (Daniel Tichenor); Sections open with a Preface by the Section Editor to introduce the broad theme at hand and provide historical underpinnings; Each section holds 12 chapters addressing varied aspects of the broad theme of the section; Chapters open with an objective, lead-in piece (or “headnote”) followed by a point article and a counterpoint article; All pieces (headnote, point article, counterpoint article) are signed; For each chapter, students are referred to further readings, data sources, and other resources as a jumping-off spot for further research and more in-depth exploration; Finally, volume concludes with a comprehensive index, and the electronic version includes search-and-browse features, as well as the ability to link to further readings cited within chapters should they be available to the library in electronic format.
Driver's Licenses
Driver's Licenses
POINT: Lawful immigration status should not be a requirement to obtain a driver's license. In fact, providing driver's licenses will help law enforcement agencies identify otherwise unknown persons. It also is likely to make the roads safer, promote auto insurance coverage, and discourage the amount of phony documents in circulation.
COUNTERPOINT: Individuals who are in the United States illegally should not be able to obtain driver's licenses or other official government identification, because the mere presence of these persons in the country is a violation of law. Permitting them to obtain driver's licenses increases risks of fraud and criminal activity. Any “benefits” that could be obtained from permitting them to obtain driver's licenses are outweighed by the harm that this causes.
Introduction
Prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, few states explicitly stated that illegal immigrants could not obtain driver's licenses. However, because many states required a social security number in order to obtain one, driver's licenses were de facto unavailable to illegal immigrants in most states. After it was revealed that the 19 hijackers on 9/11 had, among them, a total of 37 domestically obtained identity documents, including eleven state driver's licenses, many states rushed to change their laws to require proof of lawful immigration status. Although all licenses obtained by the hijackers were legal—issued by state Departments of Motor Vehicles—some had been obtained with other fraudulent documents. (Some of the hijackers had misrepresented their state residency but not their identities or their legal status.)
After 9/11, states were understandably concerned with tightening up their systems, particularly with those involved in proving residency. A debate over the wisdom of granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants ensued. (It is important to note, however, that the hijackers had entered the country legally, though several had overstayed their visas.)
In the Point essay, Michele Waslin argues that limiting immigrants' access to licenses undermines—rather than enhances—national security and that it has an “unintended harmful impact on legal immigrants and U.S. citizens.” She further argues that denying driver's licenses to illegal immigrants is a poor way to identify terrorists; does not reduce undocumented immigration; makes our roads less safe; and makes local law enforcement duties more difficult because immigrants will fear being reported to authorities and so will not report crimes to police and/or will clog local courts with a barrage of cases of the relatively minor crime of driving without a license. Waslin is firmly on the side that restricting driver's licenses is bad public policy.
In the Counterpoint essay, however, Julie Myers Wood argues that since illegal immigration itself is a violation of the law, undocumented persons should not be allowed the privilege of a driver's license. She holds firmly to the view that granting licenses to undocumented people “increases risks of fraud and criminal activity.” She bases much of her argument on one key fact: driver's licenses are not used solely for driving, but are used as primary documents that often “breed” other documents such as passports, birth certificates, firearms carry permits, hunting licenses, and school or daycare employment eligibility. While Waslin argues that the hijackers' possession of driver's licenses aided in the 9/11 investigation, Wood counters that they made it easier for the hijackers to commit their atrocities.
...
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches