Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Abstract

The U.S. incorporated technology company, Uber Technologies Inc., operating through a network of two companies, projected through written contracts that the Uber driver was a self-employed contractor and the transportation contract was only between the driver and the passenger. Uber claimed to be only a technology and information service provider, acting as an agent of the driver to contract the passenger with the driver. The Uber drivers of London challenged that the written contracts were inconsistent exterior, and in essence and practices, the Uber drivers were workers of Uber, entitled to worker benefits including minimum wages. The student will be exposed to the business model of Uber; explore and apply the agency principle to appraise the claims of inconsistency in the written contracts; apply the principle that control, direction, and supervision is of essence to being a worker to the Uber practices; and project the worker question to the business model of Uber and the platform economy.

This case was prepared for inclusion in Sage Business Cases primarily as a basis for classroom discussion or self-study, and is not meant to illustrate either effective or ineffective management styles. Nothing herein shall be deemed to be an endorsement of any kind. This case is for scholarly, educational, or personal use only within your university, and cannot be forwarded outside the university or used for other commercial purposes.

2026 Sage Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved

You are not authorized to view Teaching Notes. Please contact your librarian for instructor access or sign in to your existing instructor profile.
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading