Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Join today's most insightful thinkers as they explore the heart, mind, and soul of educational leadership!

This concise volume offers educational leaders key concepts and strategies for framing discussions about closing the equity gap and ensuring high achievement for all learners. As the first volume in The Soul of Educational Leadership series, this unique collection presents:

Pedro A. Noguera and Alan M. Blankstein on essential questions and themes; Delores B. Lindsey and Randall B. Lindsey on culturally proficient equity audits; Antoinette Mitchell on the knowledge base for teaching diverse learners in big-city schools; Stephen G. Peters on how to capture, inspire, and teach every learner; Thomas R. Guskey on rethinking the work of Benjamin S. Bloom; Karen J. Pittman and Merita Irby on readiness for college, work, and life; Alan Boyle on helping failing schools to turn around; Richard Farson on the paradoxes of risk, challenge, failure, and innovation

Pioneering educators and series editors Alan M. Blankstein, Robert W. Cole, and Paul D. Houston offer thought-provoking ideas applicable to all schools, districts, and learning communities and include a complete index for browsing and easy reference.

All Our Children Learning: New Views on the Work of Benjamin S. Bloom

All Our Children Learning: New Views on the Work of Benjamin S. Bloom

Not all groups of students learn equally well in school. Some learn excellently, reach high levels of achievement, and reap the many positive benefits of that success. But many others learn less well and gain few of those positive benefits.

These gaps in the achievement of different groups of students have been evident for decades. In the 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson's “War on Poverty” focused directly on inequalities in the educational achievement of economically disadvantaged students and their more advantaged counterparts. The Economic Opportunity Act (EOA) of 1964, which established the Head Start program, and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, which created the Title I and Follow Through programs, were specific attempts to address these gaps in educational attainment.

The gaps in the achievement of different groups of students have been evident for decades.

In recent years, achievement gaps among different groups of students have attracted renewed scrutiny. Recognizing that a highly skilled workforce is essential for success in today's global economy, public officials have enacted new legislation that requires schools to focus on high levels of achievement for all students. These new laws compel school leaders to report student achievement results separately for various poverty, ethnicity, language, and disability subgroups. Not only must these leaders identify any achievement gaps among these different subgroups, they also must take specific steps to close them.

Over the years, educational researchers have studied these educational disparities extensively and have learned a great deal about reducing them. Unfortunately, many of those proposing new programs and strategies to close achievement gaps seem unaware of this important knowledge base. As a result, they simply “rediscover” well-established principles and end up making little real progress. To succeed in our efforts to close achievement gaps and to reach our goal of helping all students learn well, we must recognize this hard-earned knowledge base and then find ways to extend and enhance it in the context of today's classrooms and schools.

This chapter describes the work of one of the foremost contributors to that knowledge base: Benjamin S. Bloom. We will consider how Bloom conceptualized and addressed the problem of achievement gaps, as well as the success that he and his students achieved in resolving the problem through the use of mastery learning. We then will describe the essential elements of mastery learning, discuss common misinterpretations, and conclude with a summary of the research on its effects in various school contexts.

The Contribution of Benjamin S. Bloom

When researchers study a problem, they first try to reduce it to its simplest and most basic form. Educational researchers who study student achievement, for example, tend to view achievement gaps simply as a matter of “variation”: students vary in their levels of achievement. Some students learn very well in school and achieve at high levels, while others learn less well and attain only modest levels. Whenever the achievement of two or more students is measured, this “variation” is evident.

The purpose of most research studies is to “explain” variation. Researchers make educated guesses, called hypotheses, about what factors contribute to identified differences among individuals or groups. They then manipulate those factors in carefully planned investigations to determine the effects. When they find a relationship between the factors that they manipulate and differences in the outcomes, they succeed in explaining variation.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading