At no point in recorded history has there been an absence of intense, and heated, discussion about the subject of how to conduct relations between women and men. This Handbook provides a comprehensive guide to these omnipresent issues and debates, mapping the present and future of thinking about feminist theory.
The chapters gathered here present the state of the art in scholarship in the field, covering: Epistemology and marginality; Literary, visual and cultural representations; Sexuality; Macro and microeconomics of gender; Conflict and peace.
The most important consensus in this volume is that a central organizing tenet of feminism is its willingness to examine the ways in which gender and relations between women and men have been (and are) organized. The authors bring a shared commitment to the critical appraisal of gender relations, as well as a recognition that to think ‘theoretically’ is not to detach concerns from lived experience but to extend the possibilities of understanding.
With this focus on theory and theorizing about the world in which we live, this Handbook asks us, across all disciplines and situations, to abandon our taken-for-granted assumptions about the world and interrogate both the origin and the implications of our ideas about gender relations and feminism.
It is an essential reference work for advanced students and academics not only of feminist theory, but of gender and sexuality across the humanities and social sciences.
Chapter 20: States' Sexualities: Theorizing Sexuality, Gender and Governance
States' Sexualities: Theorizing Sexuality, Gender and Governance
The embodied being of what counts as the state is not a neutral body, but is instead a thoroughly sexualized one, whose sexual operations are invested with political power. (Aretxaga, 2005: 265)
Look a little more closely at the word ‘state’ in its political significance as polity, commonweal, commonwealth. Place it alongside that other meaning of ‘state’ (and of ‘fantasy’) as loss of authority, and it appears that the private and public attributes of the concept ‘state’ are not opposites but shadows – outer and inner faces precisely – of each other. (Rose, 1996: 8)
This article grapples with the imperatives of sexuality and state-based governance from a feminist standpoint. It calls on but ...