"It is now three decades since the "new"institutionalism burst on the intellectual scene and a most appropriate time to take stock of missteps, accomplishments, and future directions. This theoretical thrust has revitalized many scholarly arenas across the social sciences, but none more so then organization studies. Royston Greenwood and his co-editors have assembled a stellar stable of scholars who collectively provide a comprehensive assessment if this vibrant field."—W. Richard Scott, Professor Emeritus, Stanford University"Institutional theory has become the dominant conversation in organization theory. In this volume many of its leading exponents show where it is going, what it can do and how it engages with related fields."—Stewart Clegg, Aston Business School and University of Technology, Sydney"This Handbook is "must reading" for any organization and management scholar. It provides a timely and comprehensive update of institutional theory and its relationships with other organization theories."—Andrew H. Van de Ven, Vernon Heath Professor of Organizational Innovation and Change, Carlson School of Management, University of MinnesotaInstitutional theory lies at the heart of organizational theory, yet until now, no book has successfully taken stock of this important and wide ranging theoretical perspective. With insight and clarity, the editors of this handbook have collected and arranged papers so the readers are provided with a map of the field and pointed in the direction of new and emerging themes. The academics who have contributed to this handbook are respected internationally and represent a cross section of expert organization theorists, sociologists and political scientists. Chapters are a rich mix of theory, how to conduct institutional organizational analysis and empirical work.
Chapter 21: New Sociology of Knowledge: Historical Legacy and Contributions to Current Debates in Institutional Research
New Sociology of Knowledge: Historical Legacy and Contributions to Current Debates in Institutional Research
When laying the foundations for neoinstitutional theory in 1977, both of the subsequent classic articles (Meyer/Rowan 1977; Zucker 1977) pointed to Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann's Social Construction of Reality, first published in 1966, as a central theoretical foundation and inspiration for their research program. In the equally influential ‘orange book,’ DiMaggio and Powell (1991) underline that Berger and Luckmann's phenomenological approach, together with Harold Garfinkel's ethnomethodology (another American scholar strongly influenced by Alfred Schütz; see also Psathas 2004), provides ‘the new institutionalism with a microsociology of considerable power.’
Today, beyond doubt, Berger and Luckmann's ‘new’ or social ...