Summary
Contents
Subject index
"It is now three decades since the "new"institutionalism burst on the intellectual scene and a most appropriate time to take stock of missteps, accomplishments, and future directions. This theoretical thrust has revitalized many scholarly arenas across the social sciences, but none more so then organization studies. Royston Greenwood and his co-editors have assembled a stellar stable of scholars who collectively provide a comprehensive assessment if this vibrant field."—W. Richard Scott, Professor Emeritus, Stanford University"Institutional theory has become the dominant conversation in organization theory. In this volume many of its leading exponents show where it is going, what it can do and how it engages with related fields."—Stewart Clegg, Aston Business School and University of Technology, Sydney"This Handbook is "must reading" for any organization and management scholar. It provides a timely and comprehensive update of institutional theory and its relationships with other organization theories."—Andrew H. Van de Ven, Vernon Heath Professor of Organizational Innovation and Change, Carlson School of Management, University of MinnesotaInstitutional theory lies at the heart of organizational theory, yet until now, no book has successfully taken stock of this important and wide ranging theoretical perspective. With insight and clarity, the editors of this handbook have collected and arranged papers so the readers are provided with a map of the field and pointed in the direction of new and emerging themes. The academics who have contributed to this handbook are respected internationally and represent a cross section of expert organization theorists, sociologists and political scientists. Chapters are a rich mix of theory, how to conduct institutional organizational analysis and empirical work.
New Forms as Settlements
New Forms as Settlements
Introduction
A challenge facing neo-institutionalism is to detail how pre-existing institutional conditions and alternative institutional projects influence the creation of new organizational forms. We build on the idea that varying degrees of contention underlie the construction of new forms, and suggest that a settlement or truce has to occur among contending parties for the new organizational form to gain a foothold. We develop a model of how asymmetries of power among the contestants and incompatibility among their proposals shape the nature of the settlement, and its durability. We discuss when asymmetries of power among contestants are high or low, and when ideological compatibility among the proposals is high or low, and present a matrix of possible settlements. We illustrate ...
- Loading...