Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Task performance or the outcome of some behavioral or intellectual goal is a key function of many groups. Task-performing groups include various decisionmaking groups, sports teams, and work teams. One would expect groups to benefit from their multiple and potentially complementary skills. It is true that the more able or skilled the group or team members are, the better the group is. Yet researchers have shown that there are a number of factors that inhibit productivity in groups. However, groups can also reach high levels of productivity under the right conditions and with the right group member composition.

There is an endless range of tasks that groups could potentially perform. Some of these require a simple addition of effort, whereas others require that each group member fulfill a particular role. On some tasks, the focus may be on quantity or speed of output, and on others, the concern may be with quality of work. Some tasks are mainly cognitive in that they require some degree of ideation, whereas others may be mostly behavioral (e.g., sports or music performance). According to Ivan Steiner, the effectiveness of groups may depend on the nature of the task they are required to perform. Group task performance may often be less than optimal because of two types of process losses that occur in groups: coordination and motivation. When group members work together, they have to coordinate with one another, and this requirement may make it difficult for each member to contribute his or her best effort. Group members may also be less motivated in groups than they would be if they were working by themselves.

Productivity in Task-Performing Groups

When someone works in a large group and each individual's performance is combined with that of others, a person may be less motivated to work hard on behalf of the group. This type of motivation loss is known as social loafing or free riding. Social loafing has been found to increase with the size of the group, the extent to which a person's performance is anonymous, and the degree to which the task is seen as challenging. According to Kipling Williams and Steven Karau, a person's motivation level in groups depends on the extent to which he or she believes the group goal can be attained and how much the person values this goal. That is, as long as group members perceive that there is an incentive to work hard, they will not loaf. This incentive to work hard can be increased by evaluating the work of group members individually. Generally there is a strong relationship between an individual's level of effort in the group and the personal consequences for this level of effort.

When group members are accountable to one another or in competition with one another and have challenging goals, they may in fact have increased motivation in groups. Individuals may also compensate for the lack of effort on the part of other group members if they particularly value the group goal. Similarly, a low-ability group member may increase his or her effort if the group member thinks that a small increase in his or her effort will be important to the success of the group.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading