Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Cultural capital is a concept that to date has made little impact on organization studies. Closely associated with the work of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the key French social theorists of the 20th century, the concept needs to be seen in the context of other forms of capital. The most well known of these, of course, is Das Kapital that Marx wrote about: the capital vested in the ownership and control of means of production.

Bourdieu expands the nature of capital greatly from an economic to a social and cultural relationship. In 1984, Bourdieu published the seminal Distinction, a study of how elites reproduce themselves across generations. Bourdieu argued that they use three fundamental forms of capital to do so: economic, social, and cultural capital. While Marxist scholars usually argued for the fundamental or basic importance of the economic relationship, Bourdieu was more circumspect. He argued that no form of capital is reducible to the other and that all are capable of being converted. While economic capital needs little elaboration, social capital refers to the networks that locate an agent—the “who you know” of social action. To be rich in social capital is to be well positioned in relevant social networks. For Bourdieu, social capital can be tied to familial relations or to positions within a particular institution, such as a profession. Cultural capital refers to knowledge of a particular domain: “what you know,” such as skills, knowledge, and competences, a point made by John Guillory in his book Cultural Capital published in 2000. For Pierre Bourdieu, cultural capital has three core manifestations:

  • Embodiment, whereby a person embodies particular knowledge.
  • Objectification, where cultural capital is inscribed in artifacts such as books, paintings, reports, and so forth.
  • Institutionalization, where cultural capital is conferred or consecrated upon individuals by virtue of their association with an institution, such as holding a particular appointment or credential.

Conceptual Overview

Bourdieu sees education institutions as important sites for legitimating certain forms of capital as cultural capital: They do so through servicing needs for credentials; hence, not surprisingly, the sociology of education routinely refers to this work. Bourdieu's work is quintessentially French and provides great insight into the reproduction of capital within French society through grandes écoles and the like. Nonetheless, his ideas are not bounded by the social realities of French society. They have a broader applicability to the role of business and management schools and to qualifications such as the MBA. Work by writers such as Jane Marceau and Richard Whitley has explored the acquisition of cultural capital gained by going to business school. Where individuals achieve differential mastery of a particular management discourse, such mastery implies they are “richer” in cultural capital. The acquisition of richness in cultural capital affords, among other things, a capacity to speak and cast pronouncements on a particular domain.

It does not follow that to be rich in one form of capital equates with an overall richness in capital. For instance, Bourdieu distinguishes between those rich and poor in different capitals—the intelligentsia may be poor in economic capital yet rich in cultural capital when contrasted with nouveau riche property speculators who are rich in money but impoverished in ideas of culture. Studying the dynamics of capital over two generations, Bourdieu discovered that those especially rich in economic capital were able to convert wealth in one form of capital to that of another, thus perpetuating elite reproduction. An example would be that of a property speculator or self-made business entrepreneur who is rich in economic capital but weak in cultural capital; by investing heavily in his or her children's education, the children's levels of cultural capital are raised, thus seeing a conversion of economic capital into cultural capital. Equally, the acts of a child of school teachers or university lecturers—who Bourdieu refers to as a dominated part of the dominant class—are rich in cultural capital but relatively poor when it comes to economic capital; typically, for these people getting access to an elite education followed by a career in law would be to provide an example of cultural capital being converted to economic capital.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading