Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

While interest in film geography can be traced to various authors from the mid 20th century (notably, Eugen Wirth in Germany, J. K. Wright in the United States, and Roger Manvell in the United Kingdom), it was not until the 1980s and early 1990s that a sustained geographic engagement with film occurred. Film is not a re-presentation of reality but, rather, is constituted by the industrial practices, social relations, sites, and technologies that produce these cultural products. Film produces a reality effect (a plausible representation of the world that leaves an impression of authenticity) that re-visions, resists, and engages naturalized assumptions of what constitutes reality. Film geographies work to expose these naturalized assumptions, or cultural beliefs that are passed off as natural givens.

The issue of naturalized assumptions became a prominent issue during the late 1980s and was more broadly associated with the crisis of representation. This crisis meant questioning the mimetic belief, or the idea that researchers could achieve absolute realism through representation. Realism is the degree to which any representation re-presents what a society believes to be its reality. In other words, the crisis of representation brought into question the ability to which geographic research could accurately re-present reality. The impact of the crisis was the acceptance in geography that exploring the cultural politics in films is just as important as exploring them in urban and natural environments because all are sophisticated social constructions. Broadly speaking, cultural politics refers to the ways in which meaning and identity are constructed, negotiated, contested, and literally mediated through space and representation. As such, geographers are not so much studying representations when it comes to film as seeking to analyze how cultural politics are encoded, reproduced, and perpetuated through mediated space. One way in which film geography can be characterized is under the analytical model of the author-text-reader (A-T-R model). This model derives from literary and film theory and investigates film as an expression of the cultural politics that are circulating within a particular space and time.

Author-Text-Reader

Geographers have primarily engaged the cultural politics in the space of the mise-en-scène, or space within the frame of the movie screen. The focus then has been on understanding how social and spatial meanings combine with narrative and audiovisual representations to produce cultural “texts.” With textual, or hermeneutical, analysis, a researcher seeks to interpret and understand the various meanings of a cultural text. Different theoretical approaches can be brought to bear on the readings of a text; however, film geography has typically focused on three logical sites of investigation: the author, text, and reader. With a focus on the author, analysis is limited to the production of a film and is often focused on auteur theory, where the director's vision of the meaning within the film is of utmost importance. However, a focus on the author can be expanded to include the cultural era within which the entire production of a film was created.

With a text-centered focus, the researcher becomes an “expert-reader” of the social-spatial meaning embedded within the film. The expertreader seeks to denaturalize ideologies and expose hidden power relations or social differences within the text. In film, landscape is often a metaphor for a particular type of cultural politics, helping to naturalize ideology, power relations, and social difference. While most expert-reader analysis focuses on the content of the film, some analyses specifically engage with the film's form. Interest in a film's form, or more precisely how the visual and audio elements of film are assembled into a representation, has sparked the interest of many geographers. This is especially of importance since many claim that geography is primarily a visual discipline but little has been done to examine just how the visual works to produce geographic knowledge. Film is formed by the frame of the screen, the mise-en-scène, and montage (a technique in film editing, literally meaning “putting together”). Like cartography and landscape painting, film is a product of linear perspective, or a representational system through which one can create the illusion of space on a flat surface. As such, many in film studies, geography, art history, and cultural studies have been interested in film as a modern-day cartography. The central difference between the form of linear perspective in cinema and cartography lies in the angle of the viewer: With film, the camera substitutes for the subject's eye; in cartography, the orthographic view displaces the subject so that she or he is directly above any point on a map.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading