Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Unlike most intentional communities, which have sought to offer an alternative way of life to that of the surrounding society, the kibbutz was, for almost a century, an integral part of the Zionist enterprise and (subsequently) the Israeli nation. Seeking to lead the mainstream society, it succeeded for several decades in influencing social norms, and even to some extent in setting the national tone. When the state of Israel was established in 1948, a third of its government and twenty-six of the 120 members of its parliament were members of kibbutzim; today, none are. Ultimately Israeli society and the world at large have proved too strong. Not only has the kibbutz failed to foster universal egalitarian and communal norms, it has itself succumbed to current Western materialist and individualist values.

While most of Israel's 270 kibbutzim remain voluntary, democratic societies, with a measure of equality, mutual responsibility, and cooperation, the absolute equality and all-embracing communal framework, to which all kibbutzim at least aspired, is a thing of the past. Although kibbutzim used to be relatively uniform in their structures and social norms, they are becoming increasingly different from one another.

Some kibbutzim have joined together in a movement called the Communal Stream, in an attempt to preserve and protect traditional ways. This movement includes about a dozen veteran kibbutzim and a similar number of new urban communes and experimental settlements, which offer educational and cultural facilities. However, these attempts to keep alive the communal ideal represent a small minority. The overwhelming majority of kibbutzim are moving toward a much more individualistic way of life.

Causes of the Move Away from Communal Patterns

From their earliest days, the kibbutzim saw themselves—and were seen by others—as the spearhead of the Zionist enterprise. They were among the leaders of those aspiring to create a new Jewish society in Palestine, the biblical Land of Israel. They also sought to alter the structure of Jewish society, which existed in Russia and Eastern Europe, by replacing the craftspeople and tradespeople with Jewish agricultural workers. From the outset, the kibbutz was a pragmatic society, without a specific blueprint, seeking ways to implement its principles of equality, mutual assistance, and cooperation, for the most part without a rigid dogma. Despite the initial lack of a systematic doctrine, an ideology did develop in the course of time, particularly after the creation of kibbutz-linked youth movements. Although features of kibbutz life, such as the raising of children in their own communities and eating in the communal dining hall, were originally adopted for practical reasons, they became in time compulsory dogmas. For some seventy years of dynamic social development, numerous changes were made in the kibbutz way of life, without, however, abandoning the underlying credo. The increasing importance of the nuclear family within the community, eventually resulting in the abandonment of communal sleeping arrangements for the kibbutz children, did not affect the basic principles of egalitarianism and cooperation. Nor did a number of alterations in the patterns of consumption, involving transferring items from the community budget to the private purse. All in all the basic ethic of the kibbutz was preserved.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading