Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
History of Community Corrections
The current system of corrections in the United States emerged in the 20th century as an institution designed to incarcerate offenders, deter offenders from future crimes, and transform offenders into law-abiding citizens. However, for much of European-American history, punishment was the sole means of corrections, and little or no attention was given to the idea of deterrence or rehabilitation. The rehabilitation model emerged within the system of community corrections, which operates using a diverse array of programs and sanctions allowing offenders to serve out sentences within a community setting instead of a correctional institution. This essay explores the evolution of community corrections and the pathways through which the rehabilitative model advanced from abstract to concrete philosophies of crime and punishment.
Crime and Punishment
During the Middle Ages, punishments were gruesome affairs constructed mainly for revenge and retribution. Individuals accused of the act of heresy, for example, were tortured using an instrument called the heretic's fork. Heresy constitutes a denial of faith as defined by the Catholic Church, which implies that people of the period were not allowed to question church leaders or church doctrine regardless of the abstract nature of such doctrine. Individuals who did were considered heretics and therefore subjected to the heretic's fork. The instrument, which looks much like a modern dinner fork, was strapped to the neck by a belt and positioned under the soft pallet of the chin and the sternum. The accused was then bound to a pole with the fork in position. The accused was forced to stand for several hours while attempting to hold the head up straight. Once the accused was exhausted, the head would fall forward, and the fork would puncture the heart.
By the 14th and 15th centuries, definitions of crime and punishment had become so distorted that the state began to arrest people for the crime of witchcraft. This period, which is also known as the “burning season,” eventually left several towns and villages empty of human life. Some individuals considered themselves practitioners of the dark arts. Given that many definitions of crime were grounded in superstition and mysticism, any act construed as witchcraft would be grounds for arrest.
Individuals who practiced early forms of holistic medicine fell under suspicion as well. In an attempt to ground the horror of witch burning, advice books of the times served to justify the charges and inevitable punishment. Yet despite the publication of books such as the Malleus Maleficarum (1486) of Heinrich Kramer and James Sprenger—which provided intricate details describing the cause, arrest, torture, and execution of witches—no human being was ever proven capable of flying on a broom, casting impotency spells that actually work, controlling thunder and lightning, communicating with or raising the dead, or vanishing into thin air. These activities are veritably impossible for humans to accomplish, yet thousands, mostly women, were arrested, tortured, burned at the stake, drowned, hanged, strangled, or otherwise murdered for being guilty of a crime they could not have committed.
By the 17th and 18th centuries, acts of public torture and execution had slowed to some degree, yet the definitive structure of crime remained somewhat abstract. Prior to 1820, for example, pickpockets were routinely sentenced to death by hanging. Pickpockets are individuals, usually male, who are highly skilled thieves who commit acts of larceny-theft by picking the pockets of unsuspecting victims. This crime was hardly worthy of the death penalty. Nevertheless, to ensure that the punishment had the desired effect, authorities gathered large crowds to witness the execution.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches