Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Over the past two decades, marketers of toys and children's products have developed a diverse spectrum of strategies to reach the child consumer. An important explanation for the increased interest in children is that the marketing world has discovered that today's children represent three different markets. First, they form a primary market. They have considerable amounts of money to spend on needs and wants of their own, which qualify them as a significant primary market. Children, however, also form an influence market in that they have considerable influence on family purchases. Not only do they give direction to the selection of food and snacks, they also have a say in the choice of restaurant or the make of the new car. Finally, they represent a future market. Adults often remain loyal to the brands they liked when they were children. When manufacturers influence the brand attitudes of children, there is therefore a considerable chance that these favorable attitudes will last into adulthood.

The fact that children have been discovered as three markets in one has major consequences for the commercial environment of children. For example, the amount of television advertising aimed at young children has increased considerably in the past decades. At present, there is more advertising aimed at young children than at teenagers. In addition to advertising, marketers of children's products increasingly utilize other, less obvious marketing practices that usually create less irritation among parents and adults, such as sponsoring of children's media entertainment or product placement. The frequent drinking of Coca-Cola in some comedies or soaps is an example of product placement.

To what extent does exposure to advertising increase children's purchase requests? The studies that have been conducted to date all demonstrated that children who often watch commercial television ask their parents for products more often (see Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2003, for a review of these studies). In the majority of studies, the reported correlations were around r = .30. This correlation coefficient means that children who watch commercial television at above-median levels have, on average, a chance of 65% of asking for advertised products, whereas children who watch at below-median levels have, on average, a chance of 35% of asking for products. Such a difference in the request behavior between light and heavy watchers of commercial television is, of course, very important to advertisers and marketers—certainly important enough to invest large amounts of money in extensive advertising campaigns for children's products.

Patti M.Valkenburg and MoniekBuijzen

Further Readings

Buijzen, M., Valkenburg, P. M.The effects of television advertising on materialism, parent-child conflict, and unhappiness: A review of research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology24437–456(2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973%2803%2900072-8
McNeal, J. U.(1999). The kids market: Myths and realities. New York: Paramount Market.
Robertson, T. S., Ward, S., Gatignon, H., Klees, D. M.Advertising and children: A cross-cultural study. Communication Research16459–485(1989). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365089016004001
Valkenburg, P. M.(2004). Children's responses to the screen: A media psychological approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading