Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Evolutionary Anthropology

In a famous manifesto, the geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky (1900–1975) claimed in 1973 that “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.” One could also wonder if anything in anthropology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Indeed, there is a part of anthropology that does not deal with evolutionary issues. This is true for most of cultural anthropology, especially on the fringe of the sociology domain. It is even true for some aspects of physical anthropology. Medical anthropology deals with the health status of different populations in relation to different geographical and sociocultural environments. Forensic anthropology focuses mostly on identification of body remains, as well as of living subjects. It should be also underlined that anthropology was born and developed as a science in a preevolutionist period. Although the wordanthropologos was used in antiquity, it is not before the Renaissance that it was used in a context involving goals of knowledge. Until the Classical Age, it was mostly centered on the “knowledge of one's self.” However, dissertations on the moral nature of humans developed in parallel to studies of character and anatomical descriptions. From the middle of the 16th century, surgeons such as André Vesale (1514–1564) put emphasis on the anatomical determination of the human body. The word anthropologia appears for the first time in its anatomical meaning in a German book by Magnus Hundt (1449–1519),published in 1501, Anthropologium, de hominis dignitate, natura et proporietatibus. In the 17th century, anthropology, the science of the study of humans, was divided between anatomy, addressing the body structure, and psychology, which speaks about the soul. In the 18th century, the first anthropological syntheses were developed, including the Treaty of Man by Georges-Louis de Buffon (1707–1788) and The Anthropology or General Science of Man published in 1788 by Alexandre Cesar Chavannes (1731–1800). Under the influence of the18th-century naturalists such as Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778) and Buffon, anthropology became the natural history of humans. It was defined as such in 1795 by Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752–1840). The middle of the 19th century is marked by the creation of anthropological institutions, faculty chairs, and scientific societies in France, England. Germany, and the United States.

Revolutionary Perspectives on Anthropology

Anthropology was already established as an official science when three major events revolutionized perspectives on the place of humans in nature. In 1856, fossil remains of an extinct form of humans were discovered in the site of Feldhofer (Neandertal,Germany). Discoveries of fossil humans had already occurred in 1830in Belgium (Engis) and in 1848 in Gibraltar (Forbe's Quarry). However, although these specimens were later identified as genuine fossil hominids, the finding of Neandertal was the first recognized as such. It is not before the latter part of the 19th century that the concept of Neandertals as a distinct and extinct form of humans was universally accepted. Second, in 1859, Charles Darwin(1809–1882) published his master work, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. The notion of evolutionary change in living species predated Darwin, and the French scientist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744–1829) can be considered the father of the evolution concept in its biological meaning. However, Lamarck failed to propose a valid mechanism to explain the mechanism of evolutionary processes. The primary contribution of Darwin was the identification of natural selection as a major force driving evolutionary changes. The third event of major importance also occurred in 1859. English archaeologists and geologists including Hugh Falconer (1808–1865), Joseph Prestwich (1812–1896), and Sir John Evans (1823–1908)accepted the association of human-made Paleolithic flint implements with extinct fauna in geological ancient deposits that had been described by Jacques Boucher de Perthes(1788–1868) in northern France. Although a large portion of anthropological studies still remained out of the evolutionary perspective, beginning with this period, prehistoric archaeology and human paleontology became important topics of research for cultural and physical anthropologists. Because of the complexity of the roots of anthropology, this science is the crossing point of several distinct fields of knowledge and is multidisciplinary in nature. Evolutionary anthropology can be defined more as a perspective than as a science. It is the synthesis of the various fields of anthropological studies addressing the behavioral and biological nature of humans and their mechanisms of emergence through time.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading