Published annually since 1972, the Historic Documents series has made primary source research easy by presenting excerpts from documents on the important events of each year for the United States and the World. Each volume pairs 60 to 70 original background narratives with well over 100 documents to chronicle the major events of the year, from official reports and surveys to speeches from leaders and opinion makers, to court cases, legislation, testimony, and much more. Historic Documents is renowned for the well-written and informative background, history, and context it provides for each document. Organized chronologically, each volume covers the same wide range of topics: business, the economy and labor; energy, environment, science, technology, and transportation; government and politics; health and social services; international affairs; national security and terrorism; and rights and justice. Each volume begins with an insightful essay that sets the year’s events in context, and each document or group of documents is preceded by a comprehensive introduction that provides background information on the event. Full-source citations are provided. Readers have easy access to material through a detailed, thematic table of contents, and each event includes references to related coverage and documents from the last ten editions of the series.
Chapter : Supreme Court Rules on Habeas Corpus for Asylum Seekers : June 23, 2020
Supreme Court Rules on Habeas Corpus for Asylum Seekers : June 23, 2020
On June 23, 2020, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam holding that asylum determinations made by immigration officials during expedited removal proceedings are not subject to judicial oversight. At issue was the constitutionality of the “expedited removal” provisions in an immigration law passed in 1996 that allows the government to bypass full deportation proceedings, instead allowing for rapid deportation without formal hearings or any opportunity for further review. Those in expedited removal who claim a “credible fear” of persecution if they are returned to their home countries are ...