This case is concerned with U.S. agriculture during the past 150 years. A brief review of the history of U.S. tariff legislation and farm subsidy policies indicate that the agricultural industry is supported, through its lobbyists, by a form of rent-seeking. In general, agriculture is a competitive market, and farming innovations have been driven by the market. However, potentially misplaced romanticism about the importance of farms has led to legislation that stifles competition and props up certain kinds of farmers, particularly by benefitting large farmers over small farmers. Myths about farming as the backbone of our country inspire the U.S. population to feel sympathetic to farmers. This case study shows that agricultural policy is shaped not by solid economic arguments, but by historical and cultural understandings about the importance of independent U.S. farms.
This case was prepared for inclusion in Sage Business Cases primarily as a basis for classroom discussion or self-study, and is not meant to illustrate either effective or ineffective management styles. Nothing herein shall be deemed to be an endorsement of any kind. This case is for scholarly, educational, or personal use only within your university, and cannot be forwarded outside the university or used for other commercial purposes.
2024 Sage Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved