Summary
Contents
Subject index
“La Violence introduces us to French social theory at it best. An ambitious book becomes a major, indeed a fundamental investigation into the most cruel social relationship of our time. It tells the truth.” – Jeffrey C. Alexander, Yale University
Violence is an ever-present phenomenon – obstinately resistant to interpretation. This text offers new tools to understand and analyze violence, presenting a new approach based on the subjectivity of the actor, and on the relation between violence and meaning.
The first section discusses violence and conflict, violence and the state, and violence and the media. This provides critical context for developing a new paradigm – in the second section – that gives more importance to the concept of the subject than more classical paradigms. The text distinguishes different possible relations between the meaning of action and violence and proposes a new typology of the subjects involved in violence. It gives particular emphasis to discussing cruelty, violence for violence sake, and “pure” violence.
The relationship between conflict and violence; the place of victims, and the role of the media all shape new forms of violence. This text is an engaged response to these new forms that presents a convincing interpretation and new tools that will be essential for researchers in the social sciences.
The Mark of the Subject
The Mark of the Subject
Perhaps we have to accept that the various perspectives and approaches we have discussed and which we have sharply criticized – but never dismissed – throughout this book are in many respects contradictory and fragmentary. The social sciences depart from ordinary usage, which uses the word ‘violence’ to refer to a vast range of experiences, but it is true that, different as they may be, even their most serious explanations for violence never question the use of the adjective ‘violent’. At best, they extend, or fail to extend, the spectrum of its application by questioning, for example, the pertinence of notions such as that of symbolic violence. In both spontaneous and more reflective usages, the term ...
- Loading...