What informs the process of remembering and forgetting? Is it merely about our capability to store and retrieve experiences in a purely functional sense? What about 'collective memories', not just those of the individual - how do these manifest themselves in the passages of time? The authors present a new, fascinating insight into the social psychology of experience drawing upon a number of classic works (particularly by Frederick Bartlett, Maurice Halbwachs & Henri Bergson) to help develop their argument. The significance of their ideas for developing a contemporary psychology of experience is illustrated with material from studies focused on settings at home and at work, in public and commercial organizations where remembering and forgetting are matters of concern, involving language and text based communication, objects and place. As their argument unfolds, the authors reveal that memories do not solely reside in a linear passage of time, linking past, present and future, nor do they solely rest within the indidvidual's conciousness, but that memory sits at the very heart of 'lived experience'; whether collective or individual, the vehicle for how we remember or forget is linked to social interaction, object interaction and the different durations of living that we all have. It is very much connected to the social psychology of experience. This book is written for advanced undergraduate, masters and doctoral students in social psychology. However, it will also be of particular value on courses that deal with conceptual and historical issues in psychology (in cognate disciplines as well) and supplmentary reading in cognitive science.

Communicating Experience: Interactional Organisation of Remembering and Forgetting

Communicating experience: Interactional organisation of remembering and forgetting

How can we begin to study memory in a way that does justice to the issues and concerns raised in the sources we have discussed in the first few chapters? The work of Bartlett, Halbwachs and Bergson presents a number of challenges to way in which psychologists typically understand memory and experience. It is fair to say that, until comparatively recently, psychologists have overwhelmingly thought of memory in terms of the storage of past experience. This container metaphor has dominated psychological research in the same way that talk of ‘wax tablets’ and ‘theatres’ (see Yates, 1966) was common for more ancient discussions on the topic. The problems that arise from ...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles