What informs the process of remembering and forgetting? Is it merely about our capability to store and retrieve experiences in a purely functional sense? What about 'collective memories', not just those of the individual - how do these manifest themselves in the passages of time? The authors present a new, fascinating insight into the social psychology of experience drawing upon a number of classic works (particularly by Frederick Bartlett, Maurice Halbwachs & Henri Bergson) to help develop their argument. The significance of their ideas for developing a contemporary psychology of experience is illustrated with material from studies focused on settings at home and at work, in public and commercial organizations where remembering and forgetting are matters of concern, involving language and text based communication, objects and place. As their argument unfolds, the authors reveal that memories do not solely reside in a linear passage of time, linking past, present and future, nor do they solely rest within the indidvidual's conciousness, but that memory sits at the very heart of 'lived experience'; whether collective or individual, the vehicle for how we remember or forget is linked to social interaction, object interaction and the different durations of living that we all have. It is very much connected to the social psychology of experience. This book is written for advanced undergraduate, masters and doctoral students in social psychology. However, it will also be of particular value on courses that deal with conceptual and historical issues in psychology (in cognate disciplines as well) and supplmentary reading in cognitive science.
Chapter Ten: Collecting and Dispersing Experience: Spatialising the Individual in the Mass
Collecting and Dispersing Experience: Spatialising the Individual in the Mass
In the last chapter, we concluded our exploration of ‘organised settings’ by analysing what happens when remembering becomes embedded in ‘archontic infrastructure’, or, formally organised settings. We established that what is at stake here is the relationship between the individual and the past that is formally amassed in such a way as to render the future programmed ‘in advance’.
In this chapter, we will now tack in the opposite direction to explore this general problem of how individual experience is managed in relation to the ‘burden’ of the past. This problem may be seen as emblematic of modern cultural discourses concerning memory (see Matsuda, 1996; Klein, 2000). ...