Concern and debate over changes to family life have increased in the last decade, as a result of evolving employment patterns, shifting gender relations and more openness about sexual orientation. Most politicians and researchers have viewed these changes as harmful, suggesting that the family as an institution should not alter. The ‘New’ Family? challenges these dominant views. Leading academics in the field consider current diverse practices in families, and reveal the lack of balance between policies based on how families should be and how they actually are, illustrating the need for a broader definition of family.

Generational Ties in the ‘New’ Family: Changing Contexts for Traditional Obligations

Generational Ties in the ‘New’ Family: Changing Contexts for Traditional Obligations

Generational ties in the ‘new’ family: Changing contexts for traditional obligations
JoannaBornat, BrianDimmock, DavidJones and SheilaPeace

Judith Stacey, in her book Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in 20th Century America (1991), conjures up a picture of the modern extended family as she describes the wedding of one of her research subjects where:

More than half of the pews were filled with members of four generations from the ‘confusing tangle’ of former, step-, dual and in-law relatives of Pamela and Al's divorce-extended family. (Stacey, 1991: 64)

She presents a beguiling picture of the blending of kin and step-kin as the traditional boundaries formed by blood and marriage which have marked out the territory of the family become ...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles