This is a book about who we are today, and how we have become who we are. It is about the engineers of the modern soul, the entrepreneurial self. It is essential reading for all those who care about the incessant demands placed on us to become more than we are, to become entrepreneurs of our selves, to maximise and optimise our capacities in ways that align personal identity and political responsibility. – Professor Peter Miller, London School of Economics & Political Science Ulrich Bröckling claims that the imperative to act like an entrepreneur has turned ubiquitous. In Western society there is a drive to orient your thinking and behaviour on the objective of market success which dictates the private and professional spheres. Life is now ruled by competition for power, money, fitness, and youth. The self is driven to constantly improve, change and adapt to a society only capable of producing winners and losers. The Entrepreneurial Self explores the series of juxtapositions within the self, created by this call for entrepreneurship. Whereas it can expose unknown potential, it also leads to over-challenging. It may strengthen self-confidence but it also exacerbates the feeling of powerlessness. It may set free creativity but it also generates unbounded anger. Competition is driven by the promise that only the capable will reap success, but no amount of effort can remove the risk of failure. The individual has no choice but to balance out the contradiction between the hope of rising and the fear of decline. Ulrich Bröckling is Professor of Cultural Sociology at the Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany.
In God we trust – all others have to prove their quality.1
The term quality tends to have two meanings: how something is, and how good it is. The first meaning is descriptive; something or someone possesses this or that attribute. The second meaning is a value judgement; the attribute makes the thing or the person good or valuable. Quality is therefore at once objective and subjective. Attributes can be defined and tested, whereas value judgements involve preference. In both cases though, quality is a marker of difference. Attributes or properties differentiate things, people acts and institutions from other things, people, acts and institutions respectively. The collective preferences are as diverse as the individual ones. What is important to one individual or group may ...