Summary
Contents
Subject index
Urban regime theory has gained a dominant position in the literature on local politics in the United States and its use in comparative cross-national research despite its cited shortcomings. In Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory, editor Mickey Lauria presents a challenging argument for the need to reconceptualize urban regime's middle-level abstraction by interpreting it through the lens of the higher-level abstraction of regulationist theory. The noted contributors to this volume propose stronger conceptual linkages between local agents and institutions, regime transformation, and the restructuring of urban space. The blend of empirical and case-study chapters provide an excellent mix of theory and practice that makes Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory well suited to a broad spectrum of upper-level undergraduate courses covering urban studies, political science, sociology, and geography as well as a rich resource for academics and researchers in these fields.
A Neo-Gramscian Approach to the Regulation of Urban Regimes: Accumulation Strategies, Hegemonic Projects, and Governance
A Neo-Gramscian Approach to the Regulation of Urban Regimes: Accumulation Strategies, Hegemonic Projects, and Governance
The perspective on urban regimes presented here is based on a neo-Gramscian reading of the regulation approach as well as on a classically Gramscian account of the necessary reciprocal relations between state and civil society. In particular I argue that urban regimes can be fruitfully analyzed as strategically selective combinations of political society and civil society, of government and governance, of “hegemony armored by coercion.” I also argue that such regimes may be linked to the formation of a local hegemonic bloc (or power bloc) and a historic bloc (or accumulation regime and its mode of ...
- Loading...