Reach the Highest Standard in Professional Learning: Outcomes
Publication Year: 2016
Subject: Professional Development of Staff
In July of 2011, Learning Forward released the third (and most recent) iteration of standards outlining the characteristics of professional learning that lead to effective teaching practices, supportive leadership, and improved student results. Learning Forward, with the contribution of 40 professional associations and education organizations, developed the Standards for Professional Learning. The standards make explicit that the purpose of professional learning is for educators to develop the knowledge, skills, practices, and dispositions they need to help students perform at higher levels. The standards are not intended as a prescription to meet every challenge related to improving the performance of educators and their students. Instead, the standards focus on one critical issue — professional learning. In the words of Learning Forward's Executive Director, Stephanie Hirsh, Increasing ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
A SAGE Company
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications Ltd.
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.
3 Church Street
#10-04 Samsung Hub
Copyright © 2016 by Corwin and Learning Forward
All rights reserved. When forms and sample documents are included, their use is authorized only by educators, local school sites, and/or noncommercial or nonprofit entities that have purchased the book. Except for that usage, no part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
All trademarks depicted within this book, including trademarks appearing as part of a screenshot, figure, or other image, are included solely for the purpose of illustration and are the property of their respective holders. The use of the trademarks in no way indicates any relationship with, or endorsement by, the holders of said trademarks.
Printed in the United States of America
A catalog record of this book is available from the Library of Congress.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
15 16 17 18 19 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Acquisitions Editor: Dan Alpert
Associate Editor: Kimberly Greenberg
Editorial Assistant: Cesar Reyes
Production Editor: Amy Schroller
Copy Editor: Janet Ford
Typesetter: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Proofreader: Liann Lech
Indexer: Sheila Bodell
Cover Designer: Gail Buschman
Marketing Manager: Stephanie Trkay
Introduction to the Series[Page vi]
These are the demands on educators and school systems right now, among many others:
- They must fulfill the moral imperative of educating every child for tomorrow's world, regardless of background or status.
- They must be prepared to implement college- and career-ready standards and related assessments.
- They must implement educator evaluations tied to accountability systems.
A critical element in creating school systems that can meet these demands is building the capacity of the system's educators at all levels, from the classroom teacher to the instructional coach to the school principal to the central office administrator, and including those partners who work within and beyond districts. Building educator capacity in this context requires effective professional learning.
Learning Forward's Standards for Professional Learning define the essential elements of and conditions for professional learning that leads to changed educator practices and improved student results. They are grounded in the understanding that the ultimate purpose of professional learning is increasing student success. Educator effectiveness—and this includes all educators working in and with school systems, not just teachers—is linked closely to student learning. Therefore, increasing the effectiveness of educators is a key lever to school improvement.
Effective professional learning happens in a culture of continuous improvement, informed by data about student and educator performance and supported by leadership and sufficient resources. [Page vii]Educators learning daily have access to information about relevant instructional strategies and resources and, just as important, time for collaboration with colleagues, coaches, and school leaders. Education leaders and systems that value effective professional learning not only provide sufficient time and money but also create structures that reinforce monitoring and evaluation of that learning so they understand what is effective and have information to adjust and improve.Why Standards?
Given that any system can—and must—develop expertise about professional learning, why are standards important? Among many reasons are these:
First, adherence to standards ensures equity. When learning leaders across schools and systems agree to follow a common set of guidelines, they are committing to equal opportunities for all the learners in those systems. If all learning is in alignment with the Standards for Professional Learning and tied to student and school improvement goals, then all educators have access to the best expertise available to improve their practice and monitor results.
Standards also provide a common language that allows for conversation, collaboration, and implementation planning that crosses state, regional, and national borders. This collaboration can leverage expertise from any corner of the world to change practice and results.
Finally, standards offer guidelines for accountability. While an endorsement of the standards doesn't in itself guarantee quality, they provide a framework within which systems can establish measures to monitor progress, alignment, and results.From Standards to Transformation
So a commitment to standards is a first critical step. Moving into deep understanding and sustained implementation of standards is another matter. Transforming practices, and indeed, whole systems, will require long-term study, planning, and evaluation.
Reach the Highest Standard in Professional Learning is created to be an essential set of tools to help school and system leaders take [Page viii]those steps. As with the Standards for Professional Learning themselves, there will be seven volumes, one for each standard.
While the standards were created to work in synergy, we know that educators approach professional learning from a wide range of experiences, concerns, expertise, and passions. Perhaps a school leader may have started PLCs in his school to address a particular learning challenge, and thus has an abiding interest in how learning communities can foster teacher quality and better results. Maybe a central office administrator started her journey to standards-based professional learning through a study of how data inform changes, and she wants to learn more about the foundations of data use. This series was created to support such educators and to help them continue on their journey of understanding systemwide improvement and the pieces that make such transformation possible.
In developing this series of books on the Standards for Professional Learning, Corwin and Learning Forward envisioned that practitioners would enter this world of information through one particular book, and that their needs and interests would take them to all seven as the books are developed. The intention is to serve the range of needs practitioners bring and to support a full understanding of the elements critical to effective professional learning.
All seven volumes in Reach the Highest Standard in Professional Learning share a common structure, with components to support knowledge development, exploration of changes in practice, and a vision of each concept at work in real-world settings.
In each volume, readers will find
Moving toward Transformation
- A think piece developed by a leading voice in the professional learning field. These thought leaders represent both scholars and practitioners, and their work invites readers to consider the foundations of each standard and to push understanding of those seven standards.
- An implementation piece that helps readers put the think piece and related ideas into practice, with tools for both individuals and groups to use in reflection and discussion about the standards. Shirley M. Hord and Patricia Roy, series editors and longstanding Learning Forward standards leaders, created the implementation pieces across the entire series.
- A case study that illuminates what it looks like in schools and districts when education leaders prioritize the standards in [Page ix]their improvement priorities. Valerie von Frank, with many years of writing about education in general and professional learning in particular, reported these pieces, highlighting insights specific to each standard.
We know this about effective professional learning: Building awareness isn't enough to change practice. It's a critical first piece, and these volumes will help in knowledge development. But sustaining knowledge and implementing change require more.
Our intention is that the content and structure of the volumes can move readers from awareness to changes in practice to transformation of systems. And of course transformation requires much more. Commitment to a vision for change is an exciting place to start. A long-term informed investment of time, energy, and resources is non-negotiable, as is leadership that transcends one visionary leader who will inevitably move on.
Ultimately, it will be the development of a culture of collective responsibility for all students that sustains improvement. We invite you to begin your journey toward developing that culture through study of the Standards for Professional Learning and through Reach the Highest Standard in Professional Learning. Learning Forward will continue to support the development of knowledge, tools, and evidence that inform practitioners and the field. Next year's challenges may be new ones, and educators working at their full potential will always be at the core of reaching our goals for students.Executive Director, Learning Forward
The Learning Forward Standards for Professional Learning[Page x]
Learning Communities: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal alignment.
Leadership: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students requires skillful leaders who develop capacity, advocate, and create support systems for professional learning.
Resources: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students requires prioritizing, monitoring, and coordinating resources for educator learning.
Data: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students uses a variety of sources and types of student, educator, and system data to plan, assess, and evaluate professional learning.
Learning Designs: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students integrates theories, research, and models of human learning to achieve its intended outcomes.[Page xi]
Implementation: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students applies research on change and sustains support for implementation of professional learning for long-term change.
Outcomes: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students aligns its outcomes with educator performance and student curriculum standards.
Source: Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Author.
The Outcomes Standard[Page xii]
Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students aligns its outcomes with educator performance and student curriculum standards.
For all students to learn, educators and professional learning must be held to high standards. Professional learning that increases results for all students addresses the learning outcomes and performance expectations education systems designate for students and educators. When the content of professional learning integrates student curriculum and educator performance standards, the link between educator learning and student learning becomes explicit, increasing the likelihood that professional learning contributes to increased student learning. When systems increase the stakes for students by demanding high, equitable outcomes, the stakes for professional learning increase as well.Meet Performance Standards
Educator performance standards typically delineate the knowledge, skills, practices, and dispositions of highly effective educators. Standards guide preparation, assessment, licensing, induction, practice, and evaluation. Frequently regulated by government agencies, standards establish requirements for educator preparation, define expectations of an effective workforce, guide career-long professional learning of the education workforce, and set fair and reliable indicators of effectiveness for measuring educator performance.
Teacher standards specify what teachers need to know and do to deliver on the promise of an effective, equitable education for every [Page xiii]student. Typical areas included in teacher standards are knowledge, skills, and dispositions related to content knowledge; pedagogy; pedagogical content knowledge; assessment; understanding how students learn; understanding how students' cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development influences their learning; engaging students with diverse cultures, language, gender, socioeconomic conditions, and exceptionalities; engaging families and communities in student learning; and creating learning environments, professional growth and development, and professional collaboration.
Standards for school and system leaders, like teacher standards, describe what effective leaders know and do so that every student and educator performs at high levels. Whether for teacher leaders or school or school system administrators, these standards delineate specific expectations for preparation, assessment, licensure, professional learning, practice, and evaluation of those engaged in leadership roles within a school or school system. Typical areas covered in leader standards include establishing a vision and strategic plan for effective learning; leading learning of students and staff; developing workplace culture to support learning; engaging in their own professional learning; managing facilities, workforce, operations, and resources; establishing effective relationships and communication systems; managing change; sharing leadership with others; engaging staff and families in decision making; understanding and responding to the diverse needs of students and communities; understanding and responding to cultural, political, social, legal, and financial contexts; and securing individual, team, school, and whole system accountability for student success.
Standards for other members of the education workforce delineate the unique knowledge, skills, qualities, and dispositions required of those in specialized roles. These roles include school nurses, guidance counselors, librarians, instructional coaches, resource personnel, classroom assistants, and other instructional and non-instructional staff who are vital to schools and school systems. Standards for advanced or specialized certification guide professional learning for those who seek career advancement or differentiated roles.Address Learning Outcomes
Student learning outcomes define equitable expectations for all students to achieve at high levels and hold educators responsible for [Page xiv]implementing appropriate strategies to support student learning. Learning for educators that focuses on student learning outcomes has a positive effect on changing educator practice and increasing student achievement. Whether the learning outcomes are developed locally or nationally and are defined in content standards, courses of study, curriculum, or curricular programs, these learning outcomes serve as the core content for educator professional learning to support effective implementation and results. With student learning outcomes as the focus, professional learning deepens educators' content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and understanding of how students learn the specific discipline. Using student learning outcomes as its outcomes, professional learning can model and engage educators in practices they are expected to implement within their classrooms and workplaces.Build Coherence
Coherence requires that professional learning builds on what educators have already learned; focuses on learning outcomes and pedagogy aligned with national or local curriculum and assessments for educator and student learning; aligns with educator performance standards; and supports educators in developing sustained, ongoing professional communication with other educators who are engaged in similar changes in their practice. Any single professional learning activity is more likely to be effective in improving educator performance and student learning if it builds on earlier professional learning and is followed up with later, more advanced work to become a part of a coherent set of opportunities for ongoing professional learning. Coherence also ensures that professional learning is a part of a seamless process that begins in the preparation program, continues throughout an educator's career, and aligns tightly with the expectations for effectiveness defined in performance standards and student learning outcomes.
Source: Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Author.
About the Authors
Appendix Professional Learning Planning Checklist[Page 93]Part A: Professional Development Standards
CONTEXT: The context refers to “how” the organization is set up and the culture of the school. Creating context is an ongoing process. The first step is to organize staff into professional learning communities whose goals are aligned with those of the school and with district initiatives.
___ organizes adults into learning communities that have goals in alignment with the school and District
___ requires skillful school and District leaders to guide continuous instructional improvement
___ requires resources to support adult learning and collaboration
PROCESS: The process refers to the “how” of professional development—namely, the type and forms of professional learning activities and the way those activities are planned, organized, implemented, and followed up.
___ applies disaggregated student data to determine adult learning priorities, monitor progress, and sustain continuous improvement
___ uses multiple sources of evaluation information to guide improvement and demonstrate its impact[Page 94]
___ prepares educators to apply research to decision making
___ designs learning strategies appropriate to the intended goal
___ applies knowledge about human learning and change
___ provides educators with knowledge and skills to collaborate
CONTENT: The content refers to the “what” of professional development. What is it that the entire faculty needs, even if different processes are used? What is it that students must know and be able to do?
___ prepares educators to understand and appreciate all students (equity); create safe, orderly, and supportive learning environments; and set high expectations for their academic achievement
___ deepens educators’ content knowledge, provides research-based instructional strategies to assist educators in helping students meet rigorous academic standards, and prepares them to use various types of classroom assessments appropriately (quality teaching)
___ provides knowledge and skills to help educators involve families and other stakeholdersPart B: Goals, Objectives, and Desired Outcomes
Part C: Data Analysis
Identify the strategic goal(s) or school improvement plan area(s) to be addressed by this professional development activity.
[Page 95]What are the specific desired outcomes for this activity relating to anticipated changes in the participants? Identify outcomes for at least one indicator of change:
[Page 96]Part D: Identify Resources
What data were reviewed to determine the need for this activity? (Multiple sets of data should be reviewed, including educator and student data.)
What data will be gathered in order to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of this activity?
Part E: Follow-Up
[Page 97]Part F: Evaluation
What follow-up activities will be used to support ongoing professional learning (e.g., face-to-face, online modules, learning teams)?
- How will follow-up be scheduled?
What measures will you use to assess whether the activity enabled the school to meet its goal? Evaluate the achievement of objectives at the school, team, and grade levels. What are the indicators demonstrating successful application of the knowledge or skills in the classroom to promote student achievement?
___________________________________________________________________________Part G: Continuous Planning
What are the next steps with respect to the specific activity—continue, modify, and repeat the activity?