Radical Feminism Today
Publication Year: 2001
Radical Feminism Today offers a timely and engaging account of exactly what feminism is, and what it is not. Author Denise Thompson questions much of what has come to be taken for granted as `feminism' and points to the limitations of implicitly defining feminism in terms of `women', `gender', `difference' or `race//gender//class'. She challenges some of the most widely accepted ideas about feminism and in doing so opens up a number of hitheto closed debates, allowing for the possibility of moving those debates further.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
Part One: Understanding Feminism
- Chapter 1: Defining Feminism
- On Definition
- Defining Feminism
- A Feminist Standpoint
- Chapter 2: Ideology – Justifying Domination
- Truth and Domination
- Meaning and Understanding
- Chapter 3: Ideology – ‘Enabling’ and Disguising Domination
- Pleasure and Desire
Part Two: Misunderstanding Feminism
- Chapter 4: Feminism Undefined
- Chapter 5: Other Definitions
- Chapter 6: ‘Difference’
- Differences between the Sexes
- Feminist Object Relations Theory
- Chapter 7: Differences among Women
- Feminism and ‘Race’
- Denying Male Domination
- Chapter 8: What Does it Mean to Call Feminism ‘White and Middle-Class’?
- False Universalism
- Race, Class and Gender
- Chapter 9: Masculinity and Dehumanization
- The Radical Feminist Account
- Racism, Masculinity and Dehumanization
© Denise Thompson 2001
First published 2001
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
SAGE Publications Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
32, M-Block Market
Greater Kailash - I
New Delhi 110 048
British Library Cataloguing in Publication data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 0 7619 6340 5
ISBN 0 7619 6341 3 (pbk)
Library of Congress Control Number available
Typeset by SIVA Math Setters, Chennai, India
Printed in Great Britain by The Cromwell Press Ltd, Trowbridge, Wiltshire
My task throughout has been to argue that, without acknowledgement of the meanings and values of male supremacy which structure a reality where only men are ‘human’, feminism has no unifying point of reference. I have argued that feminism's obvious concern with women only makes sense as a concern to expose the ways in which women are dehumanized under conditions of male supremacy, while attempting to rectify that dehumanization through women taking our lives and destinies into our own hands by extricating ourselves from male-defined institutions, and by creating or reasserting our own meanings and values outside male control. I have also argued that that enterprise involves women striving for a human status which does not depend on the diminution of anyone else's human rights and dignities. I have suggested that that enterprise is already possible because it is in many ways already conceivable, although the task is by no means ended because male supremacy has not yet been overcome. Indeed the struggle has just begun. Despite the centuries of women's resistance to male definition and control, feminism has made little headway against the hydra-headed monster of male hegemony. None the less, the struggle must continue.
I began with an extended definition of feminism which detailed what is involved in the idea of ‘social construction’. Although a ‘social constructionist’ perspective is central to feminist theorizing, it tends to be confined to challenging arguments appealing to ‘nature’, and hence to be too narrow in scope to allow other important implications of the concept of ‘social construction’ to be addressed. There is too little awareness of the extent to which the human individual is a social being all the way through, and of the implications of that for the feminist project of exposing and transforming the political dimensions of personal life. Taking seriously the idea that feminism's primary antagonist is a social system was necessary, I felt, if feminism was to resolve some of the contradictions into which it has been driven by a continuing covert adherence to a belief in the ontological primacy of ‘individuals’. If the subject-matter of feminism is a social system rather than just ‘women’, it becomes possible to evaluate what is said by women in the name of feminism on moral and political criteria, rather than on the basis of the experiences or feelings of women as discrete individuals. It becomes possible to challenge anti-feminist positions which masquerade as ‘feminism’ simply because they are held by women who identify as feminist; and it becomes possible to keep feminist energy and attention focused on the main enemy rather than dissipated throughout a multitude of differences among women. If the subject-matter of feminism is a social system rather than a [Page 147]matter of female personal experience, it becomes possible to identify ways in which even women can consent to our own oppression and adhere to meanings and values which operate against our own best interests; and it becomes possible to hold men accountable for the wrongs they do to women, while still acknowledging that they have choices and can refuse to comply with male supremacist requirements that men treat women as less than human. Within the schema of a social system, individuals are both bearers of social relations and the loci of moral and political judgement, decision and action which can lead to resistance and refusal.
I went on to define what kind of social system it is that feminism is opposing, that is, the social system of male supremacy structured by meanings and values which maintain the male as the ‘human’ norm. I argued that feminism's undoubted concern for women arises out of the recognition that women are debarred from human status under conditions of male supremacy, and that that is the source of the atrocities against women identified by feminism. In other words, ‘women’ are problematic in feminist terms because the relations of ruling under which we live are maintained at our expense. Feminism is unquestionably concerned with the multitude of ways in which women are human too, including not only the various ways in which we live our lives, but also the very fact that we exist at all. But I also pointed out that, unless the feminist standpoint is acknowledged in the first place as the moral and political opposition to male supremacy, feminism loses its central unifying focus, and ‘women’ become nothing but the occupants of their present ‘social locations’, caught up in mutual antagonisms to the extent that some ‘social locations’ are more privileged than others. I argued that without the explicit identification of male supremacy as the problem, there is no feminist standpoint, that ‘women's life activity’ or ‘women's experience’ is not alone sufficient to define feminist politics.
In Part Two, I argued in some detail that there is much that is labelled ‘feminism’ which is complicit with male supremacist relations of ruling because it refuses, or neglects, to name them as such, or because it actively sets out to destroy the feminist standpoint which does. The academy is an important site for the formation and distribution of meaning, far too important to allow it to be turned against the ruling interests. The gates must be kept barred against the bad crazy women threatening to cut off the phallic source of all meaning and pleasure. Unfortunately for the success of this endeavour to exclude threats to phallic supremacy, the master needs ‘trusties’. He needs discourses defending his interests visibly authored by women in order to demonstrate that his interests are women's too. But women are notoriously untrustworthy as defenders of phallocracy. There is no unequivocal sign marking off the reliable good women from the bad castrating ones. Sometimes the gatekeeping fails because the good woman and the bad woman are the same woman, struggling with the seductions and coercions of malestream thought, at one point losing her way in the tangled thickets of what counts as knowledge, at another point finding the way clearly marked by the interests of women in opposing male supremacy, only [Page 148]to lose it as the jungle closes in around her once again. Sometimes the gatekeeping fails because the master is fooled into believing that she is working in his interests because she is working in a traditional malestream discipline, whereas what she is actually doing is using her feminist insight to challenge and transform that discipline. Sometimes, sadly, it is the feminist who is deceived into believing that she is operating in women's interests by the mere fact that she is working in the field of Women's Studies, a self-deception which can only be exacerbated by the tendency to re-name Women's Studies ‘Gender Studies’.1 Sometimes the gatekeeping simply fails for no perceptible reason (apart, that is, from the general reason that no form of domination is inevitable).
I have said nothing in these pages about what is to be done in activist terms. My task has not been to address any of the various ways in which feminists in academe have struggled to place feminism on the intellectual agenda. Rather, my task has been to clarify what feminism is in the most general terms, to provide a number of illustrative examples of academic feminist writings which fall short of feminist aims, and to discuss some of the ways in which that happens. Certainly the theoretical schema I have outlined here has a multitude of practical implications. But decisions about what needs to be done, including what needs to be done within the academic domain, are the prerogative of those who are doing it. My own contribution to the struggle has been the clarification of feminist politics on the level of meaning. How that meaning translates into practical activism will depend on the particular problems and difficulties individual activists are faced with. How one engages with specific realities cannot be dictated beforehand. Each of us has to decide for herself (and himself) what is to be done, whether or not anything can be done, and how far one can go before the monstrous regime makes it too hard to go on. As Phyllis Chesler put it in the titles of the first and last chapters of her book: ‘Heroism is our only alternative’ and ‘Sister, fear has no place here’ (Chesler, 1994). Women are no strangers to heroism, despite its traditional monopolization by men; and although fear is an appropriate response to the Leviathan of male supremacy, we cannot allow fear alone to stop us.Note
1 Jocelyn Pixley has suggested that ‘Gender Studies’ might have been justified originally as an improvement on ‘Women's Studies’, because the designation ‘Women's Studies’ implies that the problems are only women's, whereas ‘Gender Studies’ would facilitate dealing with men as well. But although the word ‘gender’ is sometimes used to mean male domination, its chief use and function is to deny it. And academic departments of ‘Gender Studies’ are in fact devoted to anti-feminist substitutions for feminism, of which the most fashionable at the moment is ‘queer theory’.
References[Page 149][Page 158]1972) Sappho Was a Right-On Woman: A Liberated View of Lesbianism, New York: Stein & Day.and (1980) The Dominant Ideology Thesis, London: George Allen & Unwin., and (Aboriginal and Islander Women (1975a) ‘Black women in society: discussion’, in Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (ed.), Women and Politics Conference 1975: Volume 2, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1977.Aboriginal and Islander Women (1975b) ‘Aboriginal women's speak-out’, in Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (ed.), Women and Politics Conference 1975: Volume 2, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1977.1998) ‘Rethinking power’, Hypatia, 13 (1) (electronic version – 13 pages). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350.x(Andolsen, Barbara Hilkert, Gudorf, Christine E. and Pellauer, Mary D. (eds) (1987) Women's Consciousness, Women's Conscience: A Reader in Feminist Ethics, San Francisco: Harper & Row.1990a) ‘Violence against Aboriginal women: reconstitution of customary law – the way forward’, Aboriginal Law Bulletin, 2 (46): 6–9.(1990b) ‘Violence in Aboriginal Australia: colonisation and gender. Part I’, The Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker, 14 (2): 5–21.(1990c) ‘Violence in Aboriginal Australia: colonisation and gender. Part II’, The Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker, 14 (3): 4–27.(1974) Amazon Odyssey, New York: Links Books.(Bacchi, Carol Lee (1990) Same Difference: Feminism and Sexual Difference, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.1984) Women's Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis, London: Verso.(1991) The Politics of Truth: From Marx to Foucault, London: Polity Press.(1970) ‘Double jeopardy: to be Black and female’, in RobinMorgan (ed.), Sisterhood is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Women's Liberation Movement, New York: Vintage Books.(1979) ‘On patriarchy’, Feminist Review, 3: 66–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.1979.21(1983) Daughters of the Dreaming, Melbourne: McPhee Gribble/George Allen & Unwin.(1987) ‘The politics of separation’, in MarilynStrathern (ed.), Dealing with Inequality: Analysing Gender Relations in Melanesia and Beyond, Sydney: Cambridge University Press.(1991a) ‘Intraracial rape revisited: on forging a feminist future beyond factions and frightening politics’, Women's Studies International Forum, 14 (5): 385–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395%2891%2990043-H([Page 150]1991b) Letter to the Editors, Women's Studies International Forum, 14 (5): 507–13.(Bell, Diane and Klein, Renate (eds) (1996) Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed, Melbourne: Spinifex Press.1989) ‘Speaking about rape is everyone's business’, Women's Studies International Forum, 12 (4): 403–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395%2889%2990036-8and Napurrula (1999) ‘Sexual difference and collective identities: the new global constellation’, Signs, 24 (2), Winter (electronic version – 17 pages). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/495343(Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla (eds) (1987) Feminism as Critique: Essays on the Politics of Gender in Late-Capitalist Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.1989) The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination, New York: Pantheon Books.(Black Women's Liberation Group (1970) ‘Statement on birth control’, in RobinMorgan (ed.), Sisterhood is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Women's Liberation Movement, New York: Vintage Books.1983) ‘Study into the needs of Aboriginal women who have been raped or sexually assaulted’, in FayGale (ed.), We Are Bosses Ourselves, Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.(1990) ‘La Domination masculine’, Actes de la recherche in sciences sociales, no. 84, September.(1998) La Domination masculine, Paris: Seuil.(1991)  ‘Racism and writing: some implications for white lesbian critics’, Sinister Wisdom, 43/44: 114–34.(1987) ‘Variations on sex and gender: Beauvoir, Wittig and Foucault’, in SeylaBenhabib and DrucillaCornell (eds), Feminism as Critique: Essays on the Politics of Gender in Late-Capitalist Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.(1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, London: Routledge.(Caine, Barbara, Gatens, Moira, Grahame, Emma, Larbalestier, Jan, Watson, Sophie and Webby, Elizabeth (eds) (1998) Australian Feminism: A Companion, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.1987) ‘Bringing it all back home: love and hate in lesbian relationships’, Gay Information, 17–18 – Lesbian Issue.(1991) ‘Women and otherness’, Journal of Australian Lesbian Feminist Studies, 1 (1): 49–57.(1997) ‘Revolting women, women in revolt’, in PaulKomesaroff, PhilipaRothfield and JeanneDaly (eds), Reinterpreting Menopause: Cultural and Philosophical Issues, New York: Routledge.(Carby, Hazel (1982) ‘White women listen! Black feminism and the boundaries of sisterhood’, in Centre for Cultural Studies (eds), The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in 70s Britain, London: Hutchinson.1994) Patriarchy: Notes of an Expert Witness, Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.(1978) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.(1989) Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.(Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew and Nussbaum, Martha (eds) (1999) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.[Page 151]1978) ‘Re-thinking Marxism’, m/f, 2: 85–96.(Dalston Study Group (1978) ‘Was the Patriarchy Conference “patriarchal”?’, in Patriarchy Conference, Papers on Patriarchy: London, 1976, Brighton: Women's Publishing Collective.1978) Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, London: Women's Press.(1993) Outercourse: The Be-Dazzling Voyage, Melbourne: Spinifex Press.(1970)  The Second Sex, trans. H.M.Parshley, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.(1987) Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.(1986) ‘What is feminism?, in JulietMitchell and AnnOakley (eds), What is Feminism?New York: Pantheon Books.(1996) ‘“French feminism”: an imperialist invention’, in DianeBell and RenateKlein (eds), Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed, Melbourne: Spinifex Press.(1976) The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise, New York: Harper Colophon Books.(1970) ‘Female liberation as the basis for social revolution’, in RobinMorgan (ed.), Sisterhood is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Women's Liberation Movement, New York: Vintage Books.(1974) Woman Hating, New York: E.P. Dutton.(1981) Pornography: Men Possessing Women, London: Women's Press.(1991) Ideology: An Introduction, London and New York: Verso.(1984) Contemporary Feminist Thought, London and Sydney: Unwin Paperbacks.(1985) ‘Introduction’, in HesterEisenstein and AliceJardine (eds), The Future of Difference, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.(Eisenstein, Hester and Jardine, Alice (eds) (1985) The Future of Difference, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Eisenstein, Zillah (ed.) (1979) Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, New York and London: Monthly Review Press.1987) The Chalice and the Blade: Our History, Our Future, New York: HarperCollins.(1970)  Black Skin White Masks, London: Paladin.(1984) ‘Eve Fesl’, in RobynRowland (ed.), Women Who Do and Women Who Don't Join the Women's Movement. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.(1981)  The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, New York: Bantam Books.(1990) Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West, Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford: University of California Press.(1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, edited by ColinGordon, New York: Pantheon Books.(1985) The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality, vol. 2, New York: Vintage Books.(1990) ‘Social criticism without philosophy: an encounter between feminism and postmodernism’, in LindaNicholson (ed.), Feminism /Postmodernism, London and New York: Routledge.and ([Page 152]1977a)  ‘Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes’, in On Sexuality, Pelican Freud Library, vol. 7, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.(1977b)  ‘Fetishism’, in On Sexuality, Pelican Freud Library, vol. 7, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.(1983) ‘A critique of the sex/gender distinction’, in JudithAllen and PaulPatton (eds), Beyond Marxism: Interventions After Marx, Leichhardt, Sydney: Intervention Publications.(1991) Feminism and Philosophy: Perspectives on Difference and Equality, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.(1972) The Rise and Fall of the British Nanny, London: Hodder & Stoughton.(1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, London: Polity Press.(Grieve, Norma and Grimshaw, Patricia (eds) (1981) Australian Women: Feminist Perspectives, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.1981) ‘Aboriginal women: a study of culture contact’, in NormaGrieve and PatriciaGrimshaw (eds), Australian Women: Feminist Perspectives, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.(1989) Sexual Subversions: Three French Feminists, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.(Gunew, Sneja and Yeatman, Anna (eds) (1993) Feminism and the Politics of Difference, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.1975) ‘Aboriginal women: the means of production’, in JanMercer (ed.), The Other Half: Women in Australian Society, Victoria: Penguin Books.(1981) ‘A complex strategical situation: gender and power in Aboriginal Australia’, in NormaGrieve and PatriciaGrimshaw (eds), Australian Women: Feminist Perspectives, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.(1981) ‘What is the real material base of patriarchy and capital?’ in LydiaSargent (ed.), Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism, Boston: South End Press.(1983) ‘Why has the sex/gender system become visible only now?’ in SandraHarding and Merrill B.Hintikka (eds), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht, Boston and London: D. Reidel.(1986) The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.(1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(Harding, Sandra (ed.) (1987) Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Indiana and Milton Keynes: Indiana University Press.1974) ‘Political change: two perspectives on power’, Quest, 1 (1), Summer.(1985) Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism, Boston: Northeastern University Press.(1987) ‘The feminist standpoint: developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism’, in SandraHarding (ed.), Feminism and Methodology.([Page 153]1989) ‘Knowers, knowing, known: feminist theory and claims of truth’, Signs, 14 (3): 533–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494523(1988) Lesbian Ethics: Toward New Value, Palo Alto, CA: The Institute of Lesbian Studies.(1994) ‘Women victims denied help by Black legal centre’, Sydney Morning Herald, 5 April.(1981) Ain't I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism, London: Pluto Press.(1984) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Centre, Boston: South End Press.(1994) ‘A contemporary view of Aboriginal women's relationship to the white women's movement’, in NormaGrieve and AilsaBurns (eds), Australian Women: Contemporary Feminist Thought, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.(1991) Letter, Women's Studies International Forum, 14 (5): 506–7., and (Hull, Gloria T., Scott, Patricia Bell and Smith, Barbara (eds) (1982) All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men, But Some of us are Brave: Black Women's Studies, New York: Feminist Press.1989) The Dictionary of Feminist Theory, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1983) Feminist Politics and Human Nature, Brighton: Harvester Press.(1990) ‘Sexual difference and sexual equality’, in DeborahRhode (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.(1985) Gynesis: Configurations of Woman and Modernity, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.(1990) Anticlimax: A Feminist Perspective on the Sexual Revolution, London: Women's Press.(1992) ‘Lesbian sex therapy and the lesbian sexual revolution’, Journal of Australian Lesbian Feminist Studies, 2 (1), June.(1993) The Lesbian Heresy: A Feminist Perspective on the Lesbian Sexual Revolution, Melbourne: Spinifex Press.(1988) Strong Mothers, Weak Wives, Berkeley and London: University of California Press.(Joseph, Gloria I. and Lewis, Jill (eds) (1981) Common Differences: Conflicts in Black and White Perspectives, Boston: South End Press.1983) A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.(1985) Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.(1970) ‘Institutionalized oppression vs. the female’, in RobinMorgan (ed.), Sisterhood is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Women's Liberation Movement, New York: Vintage Books.(1985) A Feminist Dictionary, Boston, London and Henley: Pandora.and (1994) ‘Bringing class out of the closet: Book Review’, Ms, V (3): 75–6.([Page 154]1998) ‘A history of feminism in Australia’, in BarbaraCaine et al. (eds), Australian Feminism: A Companion, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.(1989) ‘Feminism: what do Aboriginal women gain?’Broadside: Newsletter of the National Foundation for Australian Women, 1 (1), November: 3.(1979) The Concept of Ideology, London: Hutchinson.(1986) The Creation of Patriarchy, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1993) The Creation of Feminist Consciousness: From the Middle Ages to Eighteen-Seventy, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.(Lesbian Ethics (1991) vol. 4, no. 2.1984) The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy, London: Methuen. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203423240(1978) ‘Scratching the surface: some notes on barriers to women and loving’, in Lorde, 1984.(1979a) ‘Sexism: an American disease in Black face’, in Lorde, 1984.(1979b) ‘An open letter to Mary Daly’, in Lorde, 1984.(1984) Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.(1987) ‘Playfulness, “World”-travelling and loving perception’, Hypatia, 2 (2), Summer: 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01062.x(1974) Power: A Radical View, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.(1977) Essays in Social Theory, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.(Maccoby, Eleanor Emmons and Jacklin, Carol Nagy (1974) The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.1982) ‘Feminism, Marxism, method and the state: an agenda for theory’, in Nannerl O.Keohane, Michelle Z.Rosaldo and Barbara C.Gelpi (eds), Feminist Theory: A Critique of Ideology, Brighton: Harvester Press.(1987) Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1990) ‘Legal perspectives on sexual difference’, in DeborahRhode (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.(1991) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.(1974)  The German Ideology, edited and abridged by C.J.Arthur, New York: International Publishers.and (1999) ‘Bourdieu ou le pouvoir auto-hypnotique de la domination masculine’, Les Temps Modernes, no. 604 (mai-juin-juillet): 286–324.(1992) Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender and the Self, London: Polity Press.(1982) The Lace Makers of Narsapur: Indian Housewives Produce for the World Market, London: Zed Press.(1970) Sexual Politics, London: Rupert Hart-Davis.(1970)  The Sociological Imagination, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.(1984) [1974a] ‘On Freud and the distinction between the sexes’, in Women: The Longest Revolution – Essays in Feminism, Literature and Psychoanalysis, London: Virago.([Page 155]1974b) Psychoanalysis and Feminism, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.(1988) ‘Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourse’, Feminist Review, 30: 61–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.1988.42(1981) ‘Socialist societies old and new: progress towards women's emancipation?’Feminist Review, 8, Summer: 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.1981.8(1990) ‘The political responsibility of intellectuals’, in IanMaclean, AlanMontefiore and PeterWinch (eds), The Political Responsibility of Intellectuals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(Morgan, Robin (ed.) (1970) Sisterhood is Powerful, New York: Vintage Books.Moses, Claire Goldberg (1998) ‘Made in America: “French feminism” in academia’, Feminist Studies, 24 (2) (electronic version – 20 pages).1994) Central Australian ‘Remote Area Aboriginal Night Patrols’: A Review, Alice Springs: Drug and Alcohol Services Association.(Myron, Nancy and Bunch, Charlotte (eds) (1975) Lesbianism and the Women's Movement, Baltimore: Diana Press.New Republic, The (1999) ‘Martha C. Nussbaum and her critics: an exchange’, The New Republic, 19 April (electronic version – 4 pages).1993) ‘Sexism, racism and Canadian nationalism’, in SnejaGunew and AnnaYeatman (eds), Feminism and the Politics of Difference, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.(Nicholson, Linda J. (ed.) (1990) Feminism/Postmodernism, London and New York: Routledge.1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, Berkeley: University of California Press.(1970) ‘For Sadie and Maude’, in RobinMorgan (ed.), Sisterhood is Powerful: An Anthology of Writing from the Women's Liberation Movement, New York: Vintage Press.(1999) ‘The professor of parody: the hip defeatism of Judith Butler (Review)’, The New Republic, 22 Feb. (electronic version – 12 pages).(1972) Sex, Gender and Society, Melbourne: Sun Books.(1988) ‘Defining feminism: a comparative historical approach’, Signs, 14 (1), Autumn: 119–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494494(1985) ‘Black women and feminism’, in HesterEisenstein and AliceJardine (eds), The Future of Difference, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.(1987) Divided Loyalties: Dilemmas of Sex and Class, London: Virago.(1993) ‘Legal developments and reform in the inter-American system’, in JoannaKerr (ed.), Ours by Right: Women's Rights as Human Rights, London: Zed Books.(Queensland Domestic Violence Task Force (1988) Report: Beyond These Walls, Brisbane: Queensland Domestic Violence Task Force.1992) ‘Changing the subject? Racism, culture and education’, in JamesDonald and AliRattansi (eds), ‘Race’, Culture and Difference, London: Sage.(Redstockings (1970) ‘Redstockings Manifesto’, in RobinMorgan (ed.), Sisterhood is Powerful: An Anthology of Writing from the Women's Liberation Movement, New York: Vintage Press.Refractory Girl (1974a) no. 5, Summer.Refractory Girl (1974b) no. 6, Autumn.[Page 156]Rhode, Deborah L. (ed.) (1990) Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.1987)  ‘Hand, brain, and heart: a feminist epistemology for the natural sciences’, in SandraHarding and JeanO'Barr (eds), Sex and Scientific Inquiry, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.(Rowland, Robyn (ed.) (1984) Women Who Do and Women Who Don't Join the Women's Movement, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.1984) ‘Thinking sex’, in Carole S.Vance (ed.), Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.(1987)  Orientalism, London: Peregrine Books.(1994) Culture and Imperialism, London: Vintage Books.(1975) ‘Women hold up half the sky’, Aboriginal and Islander Identity, 2 (6), October: 28.(1992) ‘Feminism and George Sand: Lettres Marie’, in JudithButler and JoanScott (eds), Feminists Theorize the Political, London and New York: Routledge.(1990) ‘Review of domestic violence resource materials’, Aboriginal Law Bulletin, 2 (46), October: 15–16.(1984) Is the Future Female? Troubled Thoughts on Contemporary Feminism, London: Virago.(1987)  ‘Women's Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology’, in SandraHarding (ed.), Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Indiana and Milton Keynes: Indiana University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203361900(1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology, Boston: Northeastern University Press.(1990) The Conceptual Practice of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge, Boston: Northeastern University Press.(1976) The Female Imagination, New York: A Discus Book.(1988) Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought, London: Women's Press.(1987)  Man Made Language, London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.(1982) Women of Ideas (and What Men Have Done to Them): From Aphra Behn to Adrienne Rich, London: Ark Paperbacks.(1993) Breaking out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology, London and New York: Routledge.and (1988) Where the Meanings Are: Feminism and Cultural Spaces, New York and London: Routledge.(1975) Damned Whores and God's Police: The Colonization of Women in Australia, Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin Books.(1975) ‘Black women in Australia: a history’, in JanMercer (ed.), The Other Half, Victoria: Penguin Books.(Roberta) (1984) ‘Bobbi Sykes’, in RobynRowland (ed.), Women Who Do and Women Who Don't Join the Women's Movement, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.(Roberta) (THE FEMINISTS (1973)  ‘THE FEMINISTS: a political organization to eliminate sex roles’, in AnneKoedt, EllenLevine and AnitaRapone (eds), Radical Feminism, New York: Quadrangle Books.1991) Reading Between the Lines: A Lesbian Feminist Critique of Feminist Accounts of Sexuality, Sydney: Gorgon's Head Press (self-published).([Page 157]1994) ‘Retaining the radical challenge: a reply to Wendy Hollway’, Feminism and Psychology, 4 (2): 326–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353594042019(1995) ‘Theory and its discontents: another reply to Wendy Hollway’, Feminism and Psychology, 5 (4): 531–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353595054012(1991) ‘Ethics of method: greasing the machine and telling stories’, in ClaudiaCard (ed.), Feminist Ethics, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.(1977) If Everyone Cared, Sydney: Ure Smith.(United Nations (1995) Human Rights: Harmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children, Fact Sheet no. 23, Geneva and New York: United Nations Centre for Human Rights.United Nations (1996) The United Nations and the Advancement of Women 1945–1996, New York: Department of Public Information, United Nations.Venceremos Brigade (1975) ‘Black women's statement’, Aboriginal and Islander Identity, 2 (6), October: 18.1982) ‘One child of one's own: a meaningful digression within the work(s) – an excerpt’, in Gloria T.Hull, Patricia BellScott and BarbaraSmith (eds), All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men, But Some of us are Brave: Black Women's Studies, New York: Feminist Press.(1982) ‘Black feminists search for sisterhood’, in Gloria T.Hull, Patricia BellScott and BarbaraSmith (eds), All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men, But Some of us are Brave: Black Women's Studies, New York: Feminist Press.(1990) Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman, New York and London: Verso.(1987) Wandering Girl, Broome, Western Australia: Magabala Books.(1970) Woman Power: The Movement for Women's Liberation, New York: Tower Publications.(Washington, Mary Helen (1982) ‘Teaching Black Eyed Susans: an approach to the study of Black women writers’, in Gloria T.Hull, Patricia BellScott and BarbaraSmith (eds), All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men, But Some of us are Brave: Black Women's Studies, New York: Feminist Press.1987) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory, Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.(1997) ‘(Mis)Representations: what French feminism isn't’, Women's Studies International Forum, 20 (2): 211–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395%2897%2900010-1(1951)  Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.(1946)  A Room of One's Own, London: The Hogarth Press.(1952)  Three Guineas, London: The Hogarth Press.(