Negotiating Peace in Deeply Divided Societies, delineates a novel application of simulations-as training exercises in peacemaking. It puts readers in the shoes of key actors in conflict and conflict resolution processes in order to give a more nuanced understanding of the risks and opportunities, as well as the costs, of making peace.

The book has six simulation exercises based largely on actual or potential negotiations in ongoing peace processes. While the overarching theme of these simulations is to learn from peacemaking in societies that have been violently divided by ethnic or religious conflict, only two of them replicate actual negotiations as they have taken place. Two others envisage an imaginary stage in ongoing negotiations while the others are abstract simulations that address crucial issues of contemporary debate, ending violence and humanitarian intervention.

This combination permits participants to focus on the different stages of conflict resolution in deeply divided societies, the critical issues that are involved, and the changing role that key actors play in making a breakthrough. The six simulation exercises cover important aspects of successful conflict resolution - the early stage of paving the way for a political settlement through achieving a ceasefire; the crucial middle stages of trust-building and addressing root causes; the later stages of negotiations and compromises to reach a final agreement; the post agreement stage of reconstruction and reconciliation; and the role of third parties in pushing through an end to conflict.

Bosnia–Herzegovina: Renegotiating the Constitution: Dayton 2000

Bosnia–Herzegovina: Renegotiating the Constitution: Dayton 2000

Bosnia–Herzegovina: Renegotiating the constitution: Dayton 2000
RadhaKumar and AnjaliPuri

Simulation Focus

The de facto partition created by the power-sharing arrangements under the internationally brokered Dayton Peace Agreement of 1995.

The Dayton Peace Agreement put an end to the bloody ethnic war in Bosnia-Herzegovina that killed about 250,000 people, but it also divided Bosnia–Herzegovina into two entities: a Muslim/Croat Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the Bosnian Serb Republic, Republika Srpska, each with its own president, government, parliament, police and other bodies. A weak central government and a three-member rotating presidency provided an overarching framework which was intended to bring the two entities together.

Dayton brought peace but it was, and remains, a controversial agreement, with its critics arguing that it created de facto states ...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles