Key Concepts in Critical Social Theory

Books

Nick Crossley

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Recent volumes include:

    Key Concepts in Medical Sociology

    Jonathan Gabe, Mike Bury and Mary Ann Elston

    Fifty Key Concepts in Gender Studies

    Jane Pilcher and Imelda Whelahan

    Key Concepts in Social Research

    Geoff Payne and Judy Payne

    Forthcoming titles include:

    Key Concepts in Leisure Studies

    David Harris

    Key Concepts in Urban Studies

    M. Gottdiener and Leslie Budd

    The SAGE Key Concepts series provides students with accessible and authoritative knowledge of the essential topics in a variety of disciplines. Cross-referenced throughout, the format encourages critical evaluation through understanding. Written by experienced and respected academics, the books are indispensable study aids and guides to comprehension.

    Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    Preface

    This book is intended to help students who are working with or attempting to read about aspects of contemporary critical social theory. My immediate feeling when the idea of the book was suggested to me was that it might be used as a substitute for ‘the real thing’ and I was very hesitant about accepting the challenge for precisely that reason. There is no substitute for the real thing. To understand and engage properly with theory it is necessary to hear it from the horse's mouth, that is, from primary texts and critiques. Having reflected more deeply upon the issue, however, I arrived at the conclusion that there is a genuine need for books like this in the present era. The modularization of courses has generated a situation where students often receive less teaching in areas such as theory and where advanced or contemporary theory are taught to students who have had very little introduction to even the basics and who have little time to get up to speed. This makes theory very difficult both to teach and to learn. And that, in turn, necessitates books like this, which seek to explain key concepts and offer some insight into the reasons why theorists have used and developed them. The alternative, I believe, is that theory, which is an essential element of sociology and the other social sciences, becomes so opaque as to alienate all but the smallest clique. My view regarding the importance of primary texts still stands. I would hate to think that a student did not bother reading what Bourdieu himself writes about the habitus, for example, or what Habermas writes about ‘colonization of the lifeworld’, because my entries on these topics are more accessible. But I believe that this book could be used as an aid by readers approaching these difficult ideas and texts for the first time and I hope that it will be. I hope that students will use this book to check their own understanding of concepts, to fill in gaps and perhaps also to achieve the preliminary clarification that is sometimes necessary for pressing ahead with complex materials.

    Principles of Selection

    It was suggested to me when I was first discussing the plan for the book that it should reflect my own ‘take’ on theory, my own range of interests and priorities. Undoubtedly this suggestion found its way into the process whereby I selected concepts for the book, whether intentionally or not. Some of the inclusions that I have made would not have been made by others. I have attempted, however, to be a little more systematic and judicious in my selection. Specifically I have tried to operate according to five principles.

    Firstly, I have tried to deal with the concepts of authors who strive to be precise and clear but who are not so clear as to create no need for further clarification. In effect this has meant excluding concepts which are so straightforward as to require no discussion, in my view, but also those which are so opaque or vague as to defy reasonable definition.

    This has also meant that I have refused to be drawn in by ‘naked emperors’. A great deal of what has come under the banner of ‘post’ this or that theorizing is, in my view, deliberately obscure, often to the point of incoherence, and very weak or insubstantial. The meaning of complicated sounding concepts vacillates between simple-minded obviousness and obvious simple-mindedness. I refuse to make excuses for theoretical work of this kind or to pander to its pretentiousness. And I advise students to do the same. Writers only try to sound clever and difficult, in my experience, when they have very little of any depth or complexity to offer. One should always approach texts charitably, assuming that the author has something coherent and of interest to say. But that is not always true and when the emperor has no clothes it is as well to recognize the fact. Some of the work to which I am referring may have made its way through my filter and into this book, but not much I hope.

    Secondly, I have selected concepts which have a degree of durability to them. Some writers, some of the time, develop throwaway concepts that are intended to serve a specific purpose in a specific argument but are never taken up again after this point. There is nothing wrong with this but I believe that such concepts are best dealt with in their contexts and there is no real need to extract them and discuss them in abstract, in a work such as this.

    Thirdly, I have tended towards more sociological theories and concepts. Contemporary critical theory draws upon psychology, literary/cultural studies, philosophy, geography, anthropology, history and other disciplines besides. Indeed, part of what defines it is its interdisciplinarity. It would be impossible to do justice to the input of all of these disciplines however, and my strength is sociology (with some strands of philosophy). So I have opted here, for the most part, to elucidate the sociological input to contemporary critical theory. Or rather, insofar as I have strayed beyond the most central (interdisciplinary) concepts of contemporary critical social theory, I have strayed in a sociological direction. I have tried as much as possible to do justice to the most central concepts of critical theory, as I see them, from whatever disciplinary basis, but where I have gone beyond the absolutely central concepts I have selected from amongst the more sociological strands of theory.

    It is important to add here, that my emphasis has been upon theory. Much critical writing emerges out of a practical rather than a theoretical or academic context and most critical social movements (feminist, anti-racist, workers movements, and so on) involve certain sections who emphasize the importance of non-academic writing. They believe, with some justification, that academics obscure issues which, for political purposes, could be relatively clear, and are torn in their priorities between the demands of critique and the demands of the academy. I have not included the ideas discussed in such works in this book as I see no real need for it. These ideas are expressed clearly enough in their primary sources and are not written for the purposes of academic discussion and debate.

    Fourthly, having said this, I have tried to select from within sociological theory those concepts which are critical or which belong to projects of critique. This is easier said than done, as different theories work with different definitions of ‘critique’ and there is certainly one sense of ‘critique’ which might extend to most, if not all sociology and social theory. ‘Critique’ can mean something along the lines of ‘opening up to investigation and analysis’ or ‘exploring constituent elements’, which covers just about all sociology. Furthermore, as Robert Merton (1964) argued in his response to the charge that sociological functionalism is inherently conservative, any rigorous exploration of social practices and relations tends to disturb the natural ‘feel’ that such practices and relations can otherwise acquire and is, to this extent, progressive and potentially subversive. This is independent of the fact, also noted by Merton, that the sociological form of politically critical and politically conservative theories can be identical. Radicals and conservatives alike sometimes use functionalist explanations or rational-choice analyses, for example. It is not the sociology that distinguishes them but rather the evaluative accent that is placed upon key claims and findings, or the manner in which concepts are operationalized and used. Finally, there are very few sociologists these days, in my experience, who do not offer a least some sort of ‘critical’, ‘radical’ or ‘political’ gloss upon what they are doing – apart from anything else because the demand by our political and economic masters that we ‘make it relevant’ forces this issue. Given these arguments, my claim to have selected concepts because they are critical should be treated with caution. I have tried wherever possible, however, to draw upon those theories which offer a relatively well-developed notion of social/political criticism and which put that notion at the centre of their enterprise.

    Finally, I have attempted to draw together a mix of contemporary and classic concepts – selecting those classics which continue to have contemporary relevance and which inform more contemporary work. This combination, I believe, maximizes the relevance of my selection.

    This book has not always been easy to write. I hope, however, that it is easy to read, and that it serves the intended job of smoothing the passage of students into contemporary critical social theory. As I noted above, there is no substitute for reading primary texts. But with a bit of a leg-up that should not prove too difficult.

  • Bibliography

    Adorno, T. ed. (1969) The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann.
    Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M. (1983) The Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso.
    Althusser, L. (1969) For Marx. London: Verso.
    Althusser, L. (1971) ‘Ideology and State Ideological Apparatuses’, in Essays on Ideology. London: Verso. pp. 1–60.
    Althusser, L. and Balibar, E. (1979) Reading Capital. London: Verso.
    Andersen, E. (1997) Introduction to the Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59123-5
    Archer, M. (1995) Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557675
    Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1273961.1273965
    Aristotle (1955) The Ethics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Austin, J. (1971) How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
    Ayer, A. (1946) Language, Truth and Logic. London: Gollancz.
    Bacharac, P. and Baratz, M. (1970) Power and Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Bachelard, G. (1970) Le Rationalisme Appliqué. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    Bachelard, G. (1984) The New Scientific Spirit. Boston: Beacon.
    Bachelard, G. (2002) The Formation of the Scientific Mind. Manchester: Clinamen.
    Bagguley, P. (1995) ‘Middle class radicalism revisited’, in T.Butler and M.SavageSocial Change and the Middle Classes. London: UCL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02944.x
    Barrett, M. (1991) The Politics of Truth. Cambridge: Polity.
    Beck, U. (1992) The Risk Society. London: Sage.
    Becker, G. (1996) Accounting for Tastes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Becker, H. (1960) ‘Notes on the concept of commitment’, American Journal of Sociology, 66.
    Becker, H. (1984) Art Worlds. California: University of California Press.
    Becker, H. (1993) Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
    Beissinger, M. (1998) ‘Nationalist violence and the state: political authority and contentious repertoires in the former USSR’, Comparative Politics30: 401–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/422331
    Bell, V. (ed.) (1999) ‘Performativity and Belonging’, Theory, Culture and Society (special issue) 16 (2).
    Benjamin, J. (1991) The Bonds of Love. London: Virago. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3177655
    Benvenuto, B. and Kennedy, R. (1986) The Works of Jacques Lacan. London: Free Association Books.
    Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1979) The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105649260093005
    Bernstein, J. (1995) Recovering Ethical Life. London: Routledge.
    Beynon, J. and Dunkerley, D. (2000) Globalisation; The Reader. London: Athlone.
    Bhabha, H. (1994) The Place of Culture. London: Routledge.
    Bhasker, R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/00EO00181
    Bhasker, R. (1989) Reclaiming Reality. London: Verso.
    Bhasker, R. (1994) Plato Etc. London: Verso.
    Billig, M. (1999) Freudian Repression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490088
    Blauner, R. (1964) Alienation and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/444182
    Blumer, H. (1969) ‘Collective Behaviour’, in A.McClung-LeePrinciples of Sociology. New York: Barnes and Noble. pp. 67–121.
    Blumer, H. (1986) Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley, University of California Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094141
    Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Bourdieu, P. (1983) ‘The forms of capital’, in J.RichardsonThe Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press. pp. 241–58.
    Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction. London: RKP.
    Bourdieu, P. (1986) Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity.
    Bourdieu, P. (1988) ‘Vive la Crise’, Theory and Society17 (5): 773–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00162619
    Bourdieu, P. (1990a) In other words. Cambridge: Polity.
    Bourdieu, P. (1990b) Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25557514
    Bourdieu, P. (1992a) The Logic of Practice., Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2273407
    Bourdieu, P. (1992b) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity.
    Bourdieu, P. (1993) Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
    Bourdieu, P. (1996) The State Nobility. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1772707
    Bourdieu, P. (1998a) Practical Reason. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc19845813
    Bourdieu, P. (1998b) On Television and Journalism. London: Pluto.
    Bourdieu, P. et al. (1999) The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity.
    Bourdieu, P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
    Bourdieu, P.Chamboredon, J-C and Passeron, J-C (1991) The Craft of Sociology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110856460
    Bourdieu, P., Darbel, A. and Schnapper, D. (1990) The Love of Art. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00300
    Bourdieu, P. and Haakce, H. (1995) Free Exchange. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981%2873%2990203-9
    Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J. (1996) Reproduction. London: Sage.
    Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
    Bowie, M. (1991) Lacan. London: Fontana. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/026399085786621747
    Burkitt, I. (1991) Social Selves., London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446212769
    Burkitt, I. (1999) Bodies of Thought. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222256
    Busfield, J. (1989) Managing Madness. London: Unwin Hyman.
    Butler, J. (1989) ‘Sexual ideology and phenomenological description: a feminist critique of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception’, in J.Allen and I.YoungThe Thinking Muse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.
    Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter. London: Routledge.
    Butler, J. (1994) (with Osborne, P. and Segal, L.) ‘Gender as performance: an interview with Judith Butler’, Radical Philosophy67: 32–9.
    Butler, J. (1997a) The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Butler, J. (1997b) Excitable Speech. London: Routledge.
    Buytendijk, F. (1974) Prolegomena to an Anthropological Physiology. Pittsburgh, Duquesne University press.
    Byrne, P. (1997) Social Movements in Britain. London: Routledge.
    Calhoun, C. (1994) (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT.
    Calhoun, C. (1995) ‘“New Social Movements” of the early nineteenth century’, in M.TraugottRepertoires and Cycles of Contention. London: Duke University Press. pp. 173–216.
    Callinicos, A. (2003) An Anti-Capitalist Manifesto. Cambridge: Polity.
    Camic, C. (1986) ‘The matter of habit’, American Journal of Sociology91: 1039–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228386
    Camus, A. (1948) The Plague. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200009000-00020
    Camus, A. (1975) The Myth of Sisyphus. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1522/030174432
    Camus, A. (1982) The Outsider. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Canguilhem, G. (1980) ‘What is Psychology?’ in I&C7: 37–50.
    Canguilhem, G. (1991) The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9853-7
    Cassirer, E. (1923) Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity. London: Open Court Publishers.
    Chabot, S. (2000) ‘Transnational diffusion and the African American reinvention of the ghandian repertoire’, Mobilisation5: 201–16.
    Charlesworth, S. (2000) A Phenomenology of Working Class Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489419
    Chester, G. and Dickey, J. (1988) Feminism and Censorship. Dorset, Prism Press.
    Clausen, S.E. (1998) Applied Correspondence Analysis. London: Sage.
    Clegg, S. (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
    Coleman, J. (1988) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Connell, R. (1987) Gender and Power. Cambridge: Polity.
    Cooke, M. (1997) Language and Reason: A Study of Habermas' Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Cooley, C. (1902) Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
    Coulter, J. (1979) The Social Construction of Mind. London: Macmillan.
    Crenson, M. (1971) The Un-Politics of Air Pollution. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
    Crompton, R. (1998) Class and Stratification. Cambridge: Polity.
    Crossley, N. (1994) The Politics of Subjectivity: Between Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Ashgate: Aldershot.
    Crossley, N. (1995) ‘Body techniques, agency and intercorporeality’, Sociology29 (1): 133–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038595029001009
    Crossley, N. (1996a) Intersubjectivity: The Fabric of Social Becoming. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250532
    Crossley, N. (1996b) ‘Body-subject/body-power’, Body and Society2 (2): 91–116.
    Crossley, N. (1998) ‘R.D. Laing and the British anti-psychiatry movement: a socio-historical analysis’, Social Science and Medicine47 (7): 877–89.
    Crossley, N. (1999) ‘Working utopias and social movements: an investigation using case study materials from radical mental health movements in Britain’, Sociology33 (4): 809–30.
    Crossley, N. (2001a) The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219867
    Crossley, N. (2001b) ‘The phenomenological habitus and its construction’, Theory and Society, 30: 81–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011070710987
    Crossley, N. (2001c) ‘Citizenship, intersubjectivity and the lifeworld’ in N.StevensonCulture and Citizenship. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217665
    Crossley, N. (2001d) ‘Merleau-Ponty’, in B.Turner and A.ElliottProfiles in Contemporary Social Theory, London: Sage, pp. 30–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219751
    Crossley, N. (2002a) Making Sense of Social Movements. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Crossley, N. (2002b) ‘Global anti-corporate struggle: a preliminary analysis’, British Journal of Sociology53 (4): 667–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0007131022000021542
    Crossley, N. (2002c) ‘Habitus, agency and change: engaging with Bourdieu’, Gendai Shakai-Riron Kenku (Journal of Studies in Contemporary Social Theory) 12: 329–57.
    Crossley, N. (2003a) ‘Even Newer Social Movements’, Organisation10 (4): 287–305.
    Crossley, N. (2003b) ‘From reproduction to transformation: social movement fields and the radical habitus’, Theory, Culture and Society20 (6): 43–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276403206003
    Crossley, N. (2004a) ‘Phenomenology, structuralism and history: Merleau-Ponty's social theory’, Theoria103: 88–21.
    Crossley, N. (2004b) ‘The circuit trainer's habitus: reflexive body techniques and the sociality of the workout’, Body and Society10 (1): 37–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04041760
    Crossley, N. and Roberts, J.M. (2004) After Habermas: New Perspective on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Cutler, A., Hindess, B., Hirst, P. and Hussain, A. (1977) Marx's Capital and Capitalism Today. London: RKP.
    Dahl, R. (1961) Who Governs?New York: Yale University Press.
    Danaher, K. (2001) 10 Reasons to Abolish the IMF and World Bank. New York: Seven Stories Press.
    Davidson, D. (1980) Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199246270.001.0001
    Davis, K. and Moore, W. (1945) ‘Some Principles of Stratification’, American Sociological Review10.
    de Beauvoir, S. (1948) Pyrrus and Cinéas. Paris: Gallimard.
    de Beauvoir, S. (1962) The Prime of Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    de Beauvoir, S. (1967) The Ethics of Ambiguity. New York: Citadel.
    de Beauvoir, S. (1988) The Second Sex. London: Picador.
    Degenne, A. and Forsé, M. (1999) Introducing Social Networks. London: Sage.
    Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (1999) Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557783.003.0001
    Derrida, J. (1973) Speech and Phenomena. Evanston, Il: Northwestern University Press.
    Derrida, J. (1978) Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3683950
    Derrida, J. (1982) Margins of Philosophy. Brighton: Harvester.
    Derrida, J. (1989) Edmund Husserl's Origin of Geometry: An Introduction. New York: Bison Books.
    Derrida, J. (1994) Spectres of Marx. London: Routledge.
    Descartes, R. (1969) Discourse on Method and The Meditations. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.44504
    Dews, P. (1987) The Logics of Disintegration. London: Verso.
    Dews, P. (1995) The Limits of Disenchantment. London: Verso.
    Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. (1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Brighton: Harvester.
    Durkheim, E. (1915) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
    Durkheim, E. (1952) Suicide. London: RKP. http://dx.doi.org/10.1522/cla.due.sui2
    Durkheim, E. (1964) The Division of Labour. New York: Free Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628085.008
    Durkheim, E. (1965) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
    Durkheim, E. (1973) ‘The dualism of human nature and its social conditions’, in Émile Durkheim: On Morality and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press. pp. 149–66.
    Durkheim, E. (1974) Sociology and Philosophy. New York: Free Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628085.002
    Durkheim, E. (1982) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
    Durkheim, E. (2002) Moral Education. New York: Dover Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157092510X527321
    Dworkin, A. (1981) Pornography. London: The Women's Press.
    Edwards, G. (2004) ‘Habermas and new social movements: what's new’, in N.Crossley and J.M.RobertsAfter Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Elias, N. (1978) What is Sociology?London: Hutchinson.
    Elias, N. (1984) The Civilising Process. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Elias, N. (1996) The Germans. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2906550
    Elster, J. (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812255
    Emirbayer, M. (1997) ‘Manifesto for a Relational Sociology’, American Journal of Sociology99(6): 1411–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230450
    Engels, F. (1969) The Condition of the Working Class in England. St Albans: Panther. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1246
    Evans-Pritchard, E. (1976) Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Amongst the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon.
    Eyerman, R. and Jamison, A. (1991) Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00136437
    Fairclough, N. (1994) Language and Power. London: Longman.
    Fanon, F. (1986) The Wretched of the Earth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Fanon, F. (1993) Black Skins, White Masks. London: Pluto.
    Fernando, S. (1991) Mental Health, Race and Culture. London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2012.674299
    Fine, B. (2001) Social Capital versus Social Theory. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203470787
    Foucault, M. (1965) Madness and Civilisation. London: Tavistock.
    Foucault, M. (1970) The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.
    Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/053901847000900108
    Foucault, M. (1973) Birth of the Clinic. London: Tavistock. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203406373
    Foucault, M. (1978) ‘Politics and the study of discourse’, Ideology and Consciousness3: 7–26.
    Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Foucault, M. (1980a) Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.
    Foucault, M. (1980b) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. New York: Cornell University Press.
    Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The subject and power’, in H.Dreyfus and P.RabinowMichel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester. pp. 208–26.
    Foucault, M. (1984) The History of Sexuality Vol I, Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470755501.ch17
    Foucault, M. (1988) ‘Truth, Power, Self: An Interview’, in Martin, L., Gutman, H. and Hutton, P.Technologies of the Self. London: Tavistock. pp. 9–16.
    Frankfurt, H. (1982) ‘Freedom of the will and the concept of the person’, in G.WatsonFree Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 81–95.
    Freud, A. (1968) The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. London: Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1973) Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. (Pelican Freud Library Vol. 1) Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Freud, S. (1985) On Metapsychology (Pelican Freud Library Vol. 11): Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Freud, S. (1986) Civilisation, Society and Religion. (Pelican Freud Library Vol. 12): Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.
    Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
    Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity.
    Gilroy, P. (1992) There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack. London: Routledge.
    Gilroy, P. (1993) The Black Atlantic. London: Verso. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203360644_chapter_37
    Goffman, E. (1959) Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Goffman, E. (1969) Stigma. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.allerg.2006.05.002
    Goldberg, D. (1993) Racist Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Goldstein, K. (2000) The Organism. New York: Zone. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.1977.4977667
    Goldthorpe, J. (1998) ‘Rational actor theory for sociology’, British Journal of Sociology49 (2): 167–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/591308
    Goldthorpe, J. (2000) On Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557880.004
    Gowers, T. (2002) Mathematics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02987008
    Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections From Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    Granovetter, M. (1973) ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78.
    Grehan, K. (2002) Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology. London: Pluto.
    Grosz, E. (1990) Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203330029
    Gutting, G. (1989) Michel Foucault's Archaeology of Scientific Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172141
    Habermas, J. (1970a) ‘On systematically distorted communication’, Inquiry13 (3): 205–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00201747008601590
    Habermas, J. (1970b) ‘Towards a theory of communicative competence’, Inquiry13 (4): 360–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00201747008601597
    Habermas, J. (1972) Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839317300300111
    Habermas, J. (1981) ‘New social movements’, Telos49: 33–7.
    Habermas, J. (1987a) Towards a Rational Society. Cambridge: Polity.
    Habermas, J. (1987b) The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. II. Cambridge: Polity.
    Habermas, J. (1988) Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge: Polity.
    Habermas, J. (1989) Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
    Habermas, J. (1989b) Toward a Rational Society. Cambridge: Polity.
    Habermas, J. (1991a) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Polity.
    Habermas, J. (1991b) Communication and the Evolution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.
    Habermas, J. (1992) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity.
    Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application. Cambridge: Polity.
    Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (1984) Multivariate Data Analysis. London: Prentice Hall.
    Halbwachs, M. (1958) The Psychology of Social Class. London: Heinemann. http://dx.doi.org/10.1522/cla.ham.esq
    Halfpenny, P. (1982) Positivism and Sociology. London: Allen and Unwin.
    Hall, S. (1987) ‘Gramsci and Us’, Marxism Today (June): 16–21.
    Hammond, M., Howarth, J. and Keat, R. (1991) Understanding Phenomenology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Hegel, G. (1971) The Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Hegel, G. (1979) The Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470755501.ch11
    Heidegger, M. (1978) ‘A letter on humanism’, in Basic Writings. London: RKP. pp. 190–242.
    Held, D. (1980) Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Cambridge: Polity.
    Held, D. and McGrew, A. (2002) Globalisation/Anti-Globalisation. Cambridge: Polity.
    Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethdology. Cambridge: Polity.
    Hertz, N. (2001) The Silent Takeover. London: Heinemann.
    Hindess, B. (1982) ‘Power, interests and the outcome of struggles’, Sociology16 (4): 498–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038582016004002
    Hindess, B. (1998) Choice, Rationality and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.
    Hindess, B. and Hirst, P. (1977) Mode of Production and Social Formation. London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308275X7700200804
    Hirschman, A. (2002) Shifting Involvements. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Hirst, P. (1979) On Law and Ideology. London: Macmillan.
    Hobbes, T. (1971) Leviathan. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840890.026
    Homans, G. (1961) Social Behaviour. London: RKP.
    Homans, G. (1973) ‘Bringing men back in’, in A.RyanThe Philosophy of Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 50–64.
    Honderich, T. (1973) Essays on Freedom of Action. London: RKP.
    Honneth, A. (1995) The Struggle For Recognition. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2012.648736
    Howells, C. (1999) Derrida. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219751.n14
    Hume, D. (1969) A Treatise of Human Nature. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620409.040
    Husserl, E. (1970a) The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470755501.ch9
    Husserl, E. (1970b) ‘The origin of geometry’, in E.HusserlThe Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. pp.353–78.
    Husserl, E. (1973) Experience and Judgement. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    Husserl, E. (1989) Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy; Second Book. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Husserl, E. (1991) Cartesian Meditations. Dordrecht: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9997-8
    Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (1988) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity.
    Jamison, A., Eyerman, R., Cramer, J. and Laessoe, J. (1990) The Making of the New Environmental Consciousness. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Jay, M. (1996) The Dialectical Imagination. Berkeley: California University Press.
    Jenkins, R. (1987) Social Identity. London: Routledge.
    Joas, H. (1985) G.H. Mead. Cambridge: Polity.
    Kant, I. (1933) Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.
    Kant, I. (1948) The Moral Law: Groundwork of a Metaphysic of Morals. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/frc.1988.0000
    Kant, I. (1993) Critique of Practical Reason. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Kappeler, S. (1986) The Pornography of Representation. Cambridge: Polity.
    Keat, R. and Urry, J. (1982) Social Theory As Science. London: RKP.
    Kelly, G.A. (1965) ‘Notes on Hegel's lordship and bondage’, Review of Metaphysics19: 780–802.
    Kemp, S. and Squires, J. (1997) Feminisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10402659408425796
    Kingsnorth, P. (2003) One No, Many Yeses. London: Free Press.
    Klein, M. (1993) Envy and Gratitude. London: Virago.
    Klein, N. (2000) No Logo. London: HarperCollins.
    Kojève, A. (1969) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. New York: Basic Books.
    Koopmans, R. (1993) ‘The dynamics of protest waves’, American Sociological Review58: 637–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096279
    Kristeva, J. (1980) Desire in Language. New York: Columbia University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1772011
    Kruks, S. (1990) Situation and Human Existence. London: Unwin Hyman.
    Kruskal, J. and Wish, M. (1978) Multidimensional Scaling. London: Sage.
    Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Lacan, J. (1989) Écrits. London: Routledge.
    Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1986) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
    Laqueur, T. (1990) Making Sex. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Larrain, J. (1979) The Concept of Ideology. London: Hutchinson.
    Laver, M. (1997) Private Desires, Political Action. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217047
    Leder, D. (1990) The Absent Body. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
    Leder, D. (1998) ‘A tale of two bodies’, in B.WeltonBody and Flesh. Oxford: Blackwell. pp.117–30.
    Lenin, V.I. (1918) State and Revolution. Moscow: Foreign Language Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb01266.x
    Lenin, V.I. (1973) What is to be Done?London: Progress. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjog.v21i1.14455
    Levin, D. (1989) ‘The body politics: the embodiment of praxis in Foucault and Habermas’, Praxis International9 (1/2): 112–33.
    Littlewood, R. and Lipsedge, M. (1989) Aliens and Alienists. London: Unwin Hyman.
    Levi-Strauss, C. (1966) The Savage Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Levi-Strauss, C. (1969) The Elementary Forms of Kinship. Boston: Beacon.
    Levi-Strauss, C. (1987) Introduction to the Work of Marcel Mauss. London: Routledge.
    Lloyd, M. (1999) ‘Performativity, parody, politics’, Theory, Culture and Society16 (2): 195–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632769922050476
    Lockwood, D. (1964) ‘Social integration and system integration’, in G.Zollschan and W.HirschExplorations in Social Change. London: RKP.
    Lovell, T. (2003) ‘Resisting with authority’. Theory, Culture and Society20 (1): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020001918
    Lukács, G. (1971) History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin.
    Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2007.6.3.59
    Lukes, S. (1986) Power. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2007.6.3.59
    Luxemburg, R. (1986) The Mass Strike. London: Harper Torchbooks.
    MacAn Ghaill, M. (1999) Contemporary Racisms and Ethnicities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Mandel, E. (1970) Introduction to Marxist Economic Theory. New York: Pathfinder.
    Marcuse, H. (1968) Negations. Boston: Beacon.
    Marcuse, H. (1986) One-Dimensional Man. London: Arc.
    Marcuse, H. (1987) Eros and Civilisation. London: Arc.
    Marshall, T.H. and Bottomore, T. (1992) Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.
    Marx, K. (1959) Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2550890
    Marx, K. (1976) Capital (Vol. 1): Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1967) The Communist Manifesto. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118011690.ch23
    Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1970) The German Ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168007.012
    Mauss, M. (1979) Sociology and Psychology. London: RKP. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3032558
    McAdam, D. (1995) ‘Initiator’ and ‘Spin-Off' Movements’, in Traugott, M.Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. London: Duke. pp.217–40.
    McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. (2002) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    McAllester Jones, M. (1991) Gaston Bachelard: Subversive Humanist. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    Mead, G. (1967) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Melucci, A. (1986) Nomads of the Present. London: Radius.
    Melucci, A. (1996) Challenging Codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520891
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) The Phenomenology of Perception. London: RKP.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964) Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1522/030288117
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965) The Structure of Behaviour. London: Methuen. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01965768
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968a) The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968b) The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969) Humanism and Terror. Beacon: Boston.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1971) Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973) Adventures of the Dialectic. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1974) The Prose of the World. London: Heinemann.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1988) In Praise of Philosophy and Themes From the Lectures at the College De France. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1992) Texts and Dialogues. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
    Merton, R. (1964) Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110871791
    Michels, R. (1949) Political Parties. Glencoe: Free Press.
    Monbiot, G. (2001) Captive State. London: Macmillan.
    Mueller, C. (1999) ‘Escape from the GDR, 1961–1989: hybrid repertoires in a disintegrating Leninist regime’. American Journal of Sociology105: 697–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210358
    Neale, J. (2002) You are G8, We are 6 Billion. London: Vision.
    Nietzsche, F. (1967) The Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. New York: Vintage.
    Norris, C. (1987) Derrida. London: Fontana.
    Mills, C.W. (1974) Power, Politics and People: the Collected Essays of C.W. Mills. London: Oxford University Press.
    Oakley, A. (1972) Sex, Gender and Society. London: Temple Smith.
    Offe, C. (1985) ‘New social movements: challenging the boundaries of institutional politics’. Social Research52 (4): 817–68.
    Offe, C. (1993) Structural Contradictions of the Welfare State. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Orwell, G. (1978) Nineteen Eighty-Four. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Outhwaite, W. (1993) Habermas. Cambridge: Polity.
    Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. New York: Free Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470183373.ch10
    Parsons, T. (1966) Societies. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Parsons, T. (1968) The Structure of Social Action (2 Vols). New York: Free Press.
    Pascal, B. (1972) Pensées. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/inno.019.0219
    Piaget, J. (1961) The Language and Thought of the Child. London: RKP.
    Piaget, J. (1962) Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York: W.W. Norton.
    Porter, R. (1987) Mind Forg'd Manacles. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.
    Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation Analysis. London: Sage.
    Pusey, M. (1987) Jürgen Habermas. London: Routledge.
    Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100820204
    Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Touchstone. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
    Rabinow, P. (1987) The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Robertson, R. (1992) Globalisation: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.
    Roche, M. (1992) Rethinking Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0899-5
    Rootes, C. (1995) ‘A new class? The higher educated and the new politics’, in L. Maheu Social Movements and Social Classes. London: Sage.
    Rose, N. (1985) The Psychological Complex. London: RKP. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720539608404673
    Rose, N. (1989) Governing the Soul. London: Routledge.
    Rowbotham, S. (1973) Woman's Consciousness Man's World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Ryle, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Said, E. (1978) Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2011.0036
    Said, E. (1994) Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3131609
    Sartre, J.P. (1947) ‘Huis clos’, in Théâtre I. Paris: Gallimard.
    Sartre, J.P. (1948) Existentialism and Humanism. London: Methuen.
    Sartre, J.P. (1965) Nausea. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60200-9_33
    Sartre, J.P. (1969) Being and Nothingness. London: Routledge.
    Sartre, J.P. (1972) The Psychology of Imagination. London: Methuen.
    Sartre, J.P. (1973) The Age of Reason. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5122%2897%2981513-7
    Sartre, J.P. (1976) The Critique of Dialectical Reason. London: New Left Books.
    Sartre, J.P. (1993) The Emotions: Outline of A Theory. New York: Citadel. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emcn.2004.09.006
    de Saussure, F. (1959) Course in General Linguistics. New York: The Philosophical Library. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/538001
    Savage, M. (2000) Class Analysis and Social Transformation. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218730
    Schutz, A. (1964a) Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6
    Schutz, A. (1964b) Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1340-6
    Schutz, A. (1970) Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Schutz, A. (1971) Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1700-8
    Schutz, A. (1972) The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    Scott, J. (1991) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.
    Scott, J. (1996) Stratification and Power. Cambridge: Polity. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/591397
    Scull, A. (1993) The Most Solitary of Afflictions. New York: Yale University Press.
    Sharrock, W. and Anderson, B. (1986) The Ethnomethodologists. Chichester: Ellis Harwood.
    Simmel, G. (1971) Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Simmel, G. (1990) The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.
    Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217597
    Sloan, T. (1996) Damaged Life. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203407295
    Smart, B. (1983) Foucault, Marxism and Critique. London: RKP.
    Smith, J. (2001b) ‘Globalising Resistance’, Mobilisation6 (1): 1–20.
    Snow, D., Zurcher, L. and Ekland-Olson, S. (1980) ‘Social networks and social movements’, American Sociological Review45 (5): 787–801. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094895
    Starr, A. (2001) Naming the Enemy. London: Zed Books.
    Steinberg, M. (1995) ‘The roar of the crowd’, in M.TraugottRepertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. London: Duke University Press. pp. 57–88.
    Steinberg, M. (1999) ‘The talk and back talk of collective action: a dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse among nineteenth-century english cotton spinners’, American Journal of Sociology105 (3): 736–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210359
    Stevenson, N. (2001) Culture and Citizenship. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217665
    Strauss, A. (1997) Mirrors and Masks. New Brunswick: Transaction.
    Szabó, M. (1996) ‘Repertoires of contention in post-communist protest cultures’, Social Research63 (4): 1155–82.
    Tarrow, S. (1989) Democracy and Disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Tarrow, S. (1995) ‘Cycles of collective action’, in M.TraugottRepertoires and Cycles of Collective Action, London: Duke University Press. pp. 89–116.
    Tarrow, S. (1998) Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Tilly, C. (1977) ‘Getting it together in Burgundy’. Theory and Society4: 479–504.
    Tilly, C. (1978) From Mobilisation to Revolution. Reading: Addison Wesley.
    Tilly, C. (1986) ‘European violence and collective violence since 1700’. Social Research53: 159–84.
    Tilly, C. (1995) ‘Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834’, in M.TraugottRepertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. London: Duke University Press. pp. 15–42.
    Touraine, A. (1981) The Voice and the Eye. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3790967
    Traugott, M. (1995a) Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. London: Duke University Press.
    Traugott, M. (1995b) ‘Barricades as repertoire’, in M.TraugottRepertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. London: Duke University Press. pp.43–56.
    Tucker, K. (1991) ‘How new are the new social movements?’Theory, Culture and Society8 (2): 75–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026327691008002004
    Turner, B. (1986) Citizenship and Capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin.
    WacquantL. (1995) ‘Pugs at Work’, Body and Society1 (1): 65–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357034X95001001005
    Wainwright, H. (2003) Reclaim the State. London: Verso.
    Walby, S. (1986) Patriarchy at Work. Cambridge: Polity.
    Wallach, L. and Sforza, M. (1999) The WTO. New York: Seven Stories Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044000-2.50014-6
    Waters, M. (1995) Globalisation. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/144078339403000301
    Watson, G. (1982) Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Weber, M. (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin.
    Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society (2 Vols): New York: Bedminster Press.
    Westwood, S. (1999) Power and the Social. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203299104
    White, S. (1988) The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wilson, B. (1974) Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Winch, P. (1958) The Idea of a Social Science. London: RKP. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00201746408601411
    Winch, P. (1972) ‘Understanding a primitive society’, in Ethics and Action. London: RKP. pp.8–49.
    Winnicott, D. (1971) Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock.
    Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Woodward, K. (1997) Identity and Difference. London: Sage.
    Wright, E. (1985) Classes. London: Verso.
    Wright, E. (ed.) (1989) The Debate on Classes. London: Verso.
    Wright, E. (1997) Class Counts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488917
    Wrong, D. (1961) ‘The over-socialised conception of man in modern sociology’, American Sociological Review26: 184–93.
    Young, I. (1980) ‘Throwing like a girl’, Human Studies3: 137–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02331805
    Young, I. (1998) ‘Pregnant Embodiment’, in D.WeltonBody and Flesh. Oxford: Blackwell. pp.274–85.
    Zald, M. and McCarthy, J. (1994) Social Movements in an Organisational Society. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.
    Zolberg, A. (1972) ‘Moments of madness’, Politics and Society (Winter): 183–207.
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website