- Subject index
This highly original book explains the sweeping changes to twentieth-century regimes of manners and self. Broad in scope and deep in analytic reach, it provides a wealth of empirical evidence to demonstrate how changes in the code of manners and emotions in four countries (Germany, Netherlands, England and the US) have undergone increasing informalization. From the growing taboo toward the displays of superiority and inferiority and diminishing social and psychological distance between people, it reveals an 'emancipation of emotions' and the new representation of emotion at the centre of personality. This thought-provoking book traces:" The increasing permissiveness in public and private manners, such as introductions, the use of personal pronouns, social kissing, dancing, and dating " The ascent and integration of a wide variety of groups - including the working classes, women, youth and immigrants - and the sweeping changes this has imposed on relations of social inferiority and superiority" The shifts in self-regulation that require manners to seem 'natural', at ease and authentic " Rising external social constraints towards being reflexive, showing presence of mind, considerateness, role-taking, and the ability to tolerate and control conflicts, to compromise" Growing interdependence and social integration, declining power differences and the diminishing social and psychic distance between peopleContinuing the analysis of Sex and Manners, this book is a dazzling work of historical sociology and a fascinating read.
Chapter 7: Connecting Social and Psychic Processes: Third Nature
Connecting Social and Psychic Processes: Third Nature
Three Regimes in Change
In 1998, an Islamic primary school in Amsterdam was reported never to allow teachers to leave their pupils alone in the classroom. Children were not allowed to wear short sleeves or trousers, nor tight clothing. Officially, corporal punishment was banned, but what about ‘having to stand for an hour in a corner on one leg’, a teacher wondered. According to another teacher, school management had no faith whatsoever in discussion or consultation, ‘only in authority and intimidation’ (NRC Handelsblad, 5 December 1998). Here, an omnipresent, austere supervision and checking of authoritarian rules prevailed in strict hierarchical relations. Bodies should be covered, their presence not even suggested. Trust in internalized ...