- Subject index
Health Care Ethics examines the way ethical dilemmas are played out in everyday clinical practice and argues for an approach to ethical decision-making which focuses more on patient needs than competing professional interests. While advances in medical science and technology have improved the ability to save and prolong lives, they have also given rise to fundamental questions about what constitutes life and personhood, especially in the context of what are termed 'persistent vegetative state' and 'brain death'. Drawing on the example of intensive care where such questions feature strongly in everyday practice, Kath M Melia examines how decisions are taken within the context of multiprofessional teamworking, including · whether to admit a patient and commence treatment · what the aim of treatment should be (i.e. palliation, care or cure) · when to limit, withhold or withdraw treatment · when to donate organs. As an area in which different professional groups work closely together, the author argues that there are lessons to be learnt from intensive care which can be applied to ethical decision making in all areas of health care for the greater good of patients. The book makes a significant contribution to the literature on ethics in health care and to the development of ethical decision making which prioritises the needs of patients. It is essential reading for ethicists, sociologists and health care professionals.
Chapter 2: Intensive Care Admission and Withdrawal
Intensive Care Admission and Withdrawal
The Proper Use of Intensive Care
The literature concerned with the ethics of intensive care, or indeed with the nature of intensive care, returns constantly to a central theme, that of the proper use of the ICU. To know when to admit and when to stop treatment is the issue here, but it is rarely expressed in such terms. However when we examine what is said and written on the matter, it clearly comes down to the fact that intensive care is an expensive resource which for clinical, moral and fiscal reasons must be used appropriately (Audit Commission 1999; Vella et al. 2000). The central defining issue should be a clinical one, responding to the questions ‘Does ...