Publication Year: 1996
“In this marvelous book, Beverly Fehr presents a comprehensive and richly detailed examination of what scholars have learned about the formation, maintenance, and dissolution of friendships…. Overall, a model of careful scholarship, clear writing, and good sense. For anyone studying friendships, there is no better place to start. This is perhaps the best book of its kind.” --Choice Friends are an integral part of our lives--they sometimes replace family relationships and often form the basis for romantic relationships. Friendship Processes, new in the Sage Series on Close Relationships, examines exactly how friends give meaning to our lives and why we rely so heavily on them. Broad in its coverage, the book is process oriented and research based with each phase of the friendship process documented ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: The Meaning of Friendship
- The Place of Friendship in Our Lives
- Friendship: What is it?
- Chapter 2: Theories of Friendship
- Reinforcement Theories
- Social Exchange and Equity Theories
- Cognitive Consistency Theories
- Developmental Theories
- Comparison of the Theories
- Chapter 3: Friendship Formation
- Environmental Factors
- Individual Factors
- Situational Factors
- Dyadic Factors
- Convergence of Environmental, Individual, Situational, and Dyadic Factors
- Chapter 4: Achieving Closeness
- Strangers versus Friends
- Acquaintances versus Friends
- Friends versus Close Friends
- Friends versus Best Friends
- Close Friends versus Best Friends
- Other Friendship Typologies
- Chapter 5: Gender Issues in Friendship
- Amount of Time Spent with Friends
- Conversation Topics
- Social Support
- Quality of Friendship
- Love and Affection
- Closeness and Intimacy
- Are Women's Friendships Really More Intimate than Men's?
- Gender Role Differences
- Issues in Cross-Sex Friendships
- Chapter 6: Friendship Maintenance
- Dialectics of Friendship Maintenance
- Conflict and Anger in Friendships
- Maintenance Strategies
- Chapter 7: Deterioration and Dissolution
- The Dark Side of Friendship
- Strategies for Ending Friendships
- Ending on a Happy Note
Sage Series on Close Relationships[Page ii]
Clyde Hendrick, Ph.D., and Susan S. Hendrick, Ph.D.
In this series …
by Susan S. Hendrick and Clyde Hendrick
by Rodney M. Cate and Sally A. Lloyd
by Rosemary Blieszner and Rebecca G. Adams
TWO CAREERS/ONE FAMILY
by Lucia Albino Gilbert
by Valerian J. Derlega, Sandra Metts, Sandra Petronio, and Stephen T. Margulis
by Susan Sprecher and Kathleen McKinney
by William R. Cupach and Sandra Metts
by Steve Duck
REMARRIED FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS
by Lawrence H. Ganong and Marilyn Coleman
by Daniel J. Canary, William R. Cupach, and Susan J. Messman
RELATIONSHIPS IN CHRONIC ILLNESS AND DISABILITY
by Renee F. Lyons, Michael J. L. Sullivan, and Paul G. Ritvo with James C. Coyne
by Beverley Fehr
SOCIAL SUPPORT IN COUPLES
by Carolyn E. Cutrona
by Judith Feeney and Patricia Noller
Copyright © 1996 by Sage Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
For information address:
SAGE Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications Ltd.
6 Bonhill Street
London EC2A 4PU
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
Greater Kailash I
New Delhi 110 048 India
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Fehr, Beverley Anne, 1958–
Friendship processes / by Beverley Fehr.
p. cm. — (Sage series on close relationships)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8039-4560-4. — ISBN 0-8039-4561-2 (pbk.)
1. Friendship. 2. Intimacy (Psychology). 3. Man-woman relationships. I. Title. II. Series.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
99 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
Production Editor: Tricia K. Bennett Typesetter: Christina M. Hill
Series Editors' Introduction[Page ix]
When we first began our work on love attitudes more than a decade ago, we did not know what to call our research area. In some ways it represented an extension of earlier work in interpersonal attraction. Most of our scholarly models were psychologists (although sociologists had long been deeply involved in the areas of courtship and marriage), yet we sometimes felt as if our work had no professional “home.” That has all changed. Our research not only has a home but also has an extended family, and the family is composed of relationship researchers. During the past decade, the discipline of close relationships (also called personal relationships and intimate relationships) has emerged, developed, and flourished.
Two aspects of close relationships research should be noted. The first is its rapid growth, resulting in numerous books, journals, [Page x]handbooks, book series, and professional organizations. As fast as the field grows, the demand for even more research and knowledge seems to be ever increasing. Questions about close, personal relationships still far exceed answers. The second noteworthy aspect of the new discipline of close relationships is its interdisciplinary nature. The field owes its vitality to scholars from communications, family studies and human development, psychology (clinical, counseling, developmental, social), and sociology as well as other disciplines such as nursing and social work. It is this interdisciplinary wellspring that gives close relationships research its diversity and richness, qualities that we hope to achieve in the current series.
The Sage Series on Close Relationships is designed to acquaint diverse readers with the most up-to-date information about various topics in close relationships theory and research. Each volume in the series covers a particular topic or theme in one area of close relationships. Each book reviews the particular topic area, describes contemporary research in the area (including the authors' own work, where appropriate), and offers some suggestions for interesting research questions and/or real-world applications related to the topic. The volumes are designed to be appropriate for students and professionals in communication, family studies, psychology, sociology, and social work, among others. A basic assumption of the series is that the broad panorama of close relationships can best be portrayed by authors from multiple disciplines, so that the series cannot be “captured” by any single disciplinary bias.
The current volume, Friendship Processes by Beverley Fehr, is a comprehensive examination of one important kind of close relationship. Friendship is a universal feature of the human condition, today and in Aristotle's time, as Fehr aptly demonstrates with several quotations from the master philosopher.
We believe that this book will be the definitive study of friendship processes for many years to come. It is broad in its coverage, including an extensive reference section. The book is process oriented in the developmental sense of elaborating the life cycle of friendship, from its first origins to its endings. Within each stage of the cycle, there is careful attention to individual and interaction [Page xi]processes that occur. The volume is also research based. Each phase of the friendship process is documented by empirical research, including a review of the classical studies as well as the most up-to-date empirical reports. The result is an excellent conceptual scheme, a developmental approach to processes, supported by a detailed examination of the latest research on friendship.
This volume illustrates well the fact that as a field of study, close relationships is maturing rapidly. A decade ago this volume would not have been possible, because not enough systematic research was available. Today, as we can testify, this book could easily have been much longer. This excellent book will be of interest to students as well as professionals. Indeed, we learned a great deal from it ourselves., Series Editors
This book is about friendship. Its purpose is to illuminate friendship processes—how we make friends, how we become close, how we maintain friends, and how friendships deteriorate and dissolve. Thus, the book is loosely organized in terms of the life cycle of friendship. The first two chapters provide a foundation for the rest of the volume. Chapter 1 sets the stage by highlighting the importance of friendship in our lives. In addition, the chapter delves into the meaning of friendship for scientific experts as well as for ordinary people—young and old. In Chapter 2, the major theories of friendship, dating back to Newcomb's formulations in the 1950s, are presented. Chapter 3 focuses on the process of getting friendships started. Given that we meet many people in our lives, what leads us to like some individuals more than others? What are the factors that facilitate or impede the initiation of [Page xiv]friendships? After contact is established, what variables are important in propelling the relationship forward? Chapter 4 continues this analysis by asking: once tentative steps toward friendship formation have been taken, how do people become close? Thus, in these chapters, the process by which friendships develop and are transformed into intimate, important relationships is explored. In Chapter 5, the focus is gender issues in friendship. The nature and experience of women's and men's friendships is the subject of analysis. Controversial issues such as whether women's friendships are more intimate than men's are discussed. The purpose of Chapter 6 is to discover how people maintain their friendship relationships. Issues involved in keeping up one's friendships are examined. Finally, Chapter 7 deals with the undeniable reality that some friendships are unsatisfying and eventually end. Thus, this chapter focuses on the deterioration and dissolution of friendships. But endings often bring new beginnings. By returning to the early chapters in the book, it is hoped that readers can face the prospect of developing new friendships equipped with pertinent, valuable knowledge about the formation and continuation of this intriguing personal relationship.Acknowledgments
There are many people whose help and support sustained me throughout the process of writing this book. I am grateful to Clyde and Susan Hendrick for their patience and encouragement, as well as their prompt, useful feedback on drafts of the manuscript. Dan Perlman's valuable input helped get this project off the ground during a summer I spent at the University of British Columbia. My understanding of friendship has been enriched through our ongoing discussions. Sue Sprecher contributed substantially through her detailed comments on the entire manuscript sent via E-mail along with large doses of emotional support. Thank you also to Harry Reis for his insightful comments on Chapter 5 and to my colleagues Mark Baldwin and Pat Keelan for their willing assistance and feedback. The encouragement and interest shown by other colleagues and friends in the Psychology Department of the [Page xv]University of Winnipeg also is greatly appreciated. The research assistants who worked with me at various stages of the project deserve many thanks: Mary Kronenwald, Lisa Sinclair, Lisa Pippus, and Vicki Enns. I am indebted to Mavis Close and Connie Lambert for the competent secretarial assistance they provided.
On a personal note, I wish to thank my husband, Marvin, for the practical (particularly the homemade pies) and emotional support he provided. I believe that he is even happier than I am that this project has come to a close. Thank you also to my sister, Lois, for her unfailing enthusiasm and confidence that I could and would complete this project. A benefit of writing a book on friendship is that one is constantly reminded of treasured friends. I am especially grateful to Lorrie, Ann, Carla, Gerry, and Delores for their friendship and support. Finally, a special thank you to my cherished, longtime friend, Lydia, who exemplifies the qualities of a true friend.
This project was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. My summer at the University of British Columbia was made possible through a University of Winnipeg Summer Research Furlough Grant.[Page xvi]
References[Page 202]1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1680(1985). People would talk: Normative barriers to cross-sex friendships for elderly women. The Gerontologist, 25, 605–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/25.6.605(1985–1986). Emotional closeness and physical distance between friends: Implications for elderly women living in age-segregated and age-integrated settings. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 22, 55–76.(1994, May). Maintenance behaviors in same- and opposite-sex friendships: Connections to gender, relational closeness, and equity issues. Paper presented at the 1994 International Network on Personal Relationships Conference, Iowa City, IA., , & (1989). Friendship: Developing a sociological perspective. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1976). Sex differences in emotionality: A multidimensional approach. Human Relations, 29, 711–722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872677602900801, & ([Page 203]1973). Reciprocity of interpersonal exchange. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 3, 249–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1973.tb00325.x(1965). Interpersonal exchange in isolation. Sociometry, 28, 411–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2785992, & (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston., & (1989). Men and women can be friends. In N.Bernards & T.O'Neill (Eds.), Male/female roles (pp. 207–212). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.(1978). Disclosure reciprocity and its limits: A reactance analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 527–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2878%2990047-1, & (1980). The effects of timing of self-disclosure on attraction and reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 120–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124, & (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen.(1982). The ecology of relationships: Choice of situations as a function of relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 259–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1982.tb00547.x, & (1984). The rules of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 211–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407584012005, & (1985). The rules of relationships. In S.Duck & D.Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 63–84). London: Sage., & (1974). The meaning of five patterns of gaze. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 125–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420040202, , & (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9, 1183–1196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00303101, & (Aristotle. (1931). Ethica nicomachea (W. D.Ross, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.Aristotle. (1984). Rhetoric. In J.Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (Vol. 2, pp. 2152–2269). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.1989). Experiences of falling in love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 243–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407589063001, , , & (1980). Children's friendships and social competence. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 7, 27–39., , & (1991). Close relationships in the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease. In W. H.Jones & D.Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: A research annual (Vol. 3, pp. 207–231). London: Jessica Kingsley., , & (1988). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19, 57–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00292464, , & (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1145([Page 204]1982). Perceived use of evaluative statements in developing, stable, and deteriorating relationships with a person of the same or opposite sex. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 20–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570318209374062(1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 62–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463378309369487(1989). Older widows and married women: Their intimates and confidants. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 21–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/NPEA-2J32-5CV3-RUG7, & (1959). The effect of perceived liking on interpersonal attraction. Human Relations, 12, 379–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675901200407, & (1981). Gender and sex-role orientation effects on friendship choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 605–610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616728174015, , & (1995, January 9). Hockey like you've never seen. Winnipeg Free Press (reprinted from Miami Herald), p. C4.(1988). A theoretical analysis of sex differences in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles, 19, 349–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289842, & (1986). Perception of friendship qualities. Psychological Research Journal, 10, 33–41., & (1979). Self-disclosure as a relationship disengagement strategy: An exploratory investigation. Human Communication Research, 5, 215–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00635.x(1982). Strategies for ending relationships: Two studies. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 223–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570318209374082(1983). Relationship disengagement: An examination of the reversal hypothesis. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 85–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570318309374109(1985). Accomplishing relationship disengagement. In S.Duck & D.Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships (pp. 243–265). London: Sage.(1994). A dialogic approach to relationship maintenance. In D. J.Canary & L.Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 233–254). New York: Academic Press.(1982). Attribution-based strategies for initiating and terminating friendships. Communication Quarterly, 30, 217–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463378209369452, & (1986). Interaction characteristics of disengaging, stable, and growing relationships. In R.Gilmour & S. W.Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 145–159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (1987). Friendship between women: A phenomenological study of best friends. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 18, 59–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156916287X00050(1981a). Friendships of women and of men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 402–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00582.x(1981b). Worlds of friendship. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.([Page 205]1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036215(1993). What's yours is mine and what's mine is yours: Couple friends. In P.Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 169–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (1984). Development of friendship between roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 346–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1996(1987). Responsiveness and self-disclosure. In V. J.Derlega & J. H.Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 101–130). New York: Plenum.(1980). Disclosure or concern: A second look at liking for the norm breaker. Journal of Personality, 48, 245–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1980.tb00831.x, & (1986). Differences in social exchange between intimate and other relationships: Gradually evolving or quickly apparent? In V. J.Derlega & B. A.Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 101–128). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_6, & (1988). Sex differences in friendship patterns in India and in the United States. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 61–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0901_5, , & (1981). Effects of friendship on prosocial intentions and behavior. Child Development, 52, 636–643. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1129184(1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1447–1460. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130071(1986). Children's comments about their friendships. In M.Perlmutter (Ed.), Cognitive perspectives on children's social and behavioral development (pp. 189–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.(1988). The nature and significance of children's friendships. In R.Varta (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 5, pp. 155–186). Greenwich, CT: JAI.(1987). Effects of popularity and friendship on perceptions of the personality and social behavior of peers. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 429–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431687074005, & (1987). The contribution of supportive friendships to adjustment after the transition to junior high school. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University., & (1986). Changes in friendship during a school year: Effects on children's and adolescents' impressions of friendship and sharing with friends. Child Development, 57, 1284–1297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130451, , & (1985). Stability and change in childhood and adolescent friendships. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1007–1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.527, & (1986). Children's perceptions of friendships as supportive relationships. Developmental Psychology, 22, 640–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2060, & ([Page 206]1977). Interpersonal attraction. In B. B.Wolman (Ed.), International encyclopedia of psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis, and neurology (Vol. 2, pp. 201–204). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.(1979). The initiation of interpersonal relationships and social attraction. In R. L.Burgess & T. L.Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 31–60). New York: Academic Press., & (1976). Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 978–989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.118, , , & (1983). The emerging science of relationships. In H. H.Kelley, E.Berscheid, A.Christensen, J. H.Harvey, T. L.Huston, G.Levinger, E.McClintock, L. A.Peplau, & D. R.Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 1–19). New York: W. H. Freeman., & (1989). Issues in studying close relationships: Conceptualizing and measuring closeness. In C.Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 10. Close relationships (pp. 63–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage., , & (1978). Interpersonal attraction (, & (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.1975). Children's written descriptions of friendship: A multidimensional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 11, 857–858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1618.104.22.1687, & (1980). The development of friendship values and choice. In H. C.Foot, A. J.Chapman, & J. R.Smith (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 15–44). Chichester, UK: John Wiley., & (1986). Preschool children's food sharing with friends and acquaintances. Child Development, 57, 387–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130594, & (1989). Gender differences in self-rated emotional expressiveness. Sex Roles, 21, 287–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289908, & (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1987). Gender differences in perceived intimacy with different members of adolescents' social networks. Sex Roles, 17, 689–718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287683, & (1972). Sex and social participation. American Sociological Review, 37, 183–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094026(1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 38–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350992, & (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265(1990). Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 791–800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1241, , & ([Page 207]1983). The language of lovers, flovers, and friends: Communicating in social and personal relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 141–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8300200205(1985). Intimate relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill.(1974). Friendship. New York: Stein & Day.(1987). Sex differences in same- and cross-sex supportive relationships. Sex Roles, 17, 339–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288457, & (1988). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 991–1008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1991, , , & (1987). Friendship conceptions among early adolescents: A longitudinal study of stability and change. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 143–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431687072002, , & (1994). Friendship and similarities in social-cognitive and communication abilities: Social skill bases of interpersonal attraction in childhood. Personal Relationships, 1, 371–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00071.x(1994, July). How similarities in cognitive complexity influence attraction to friends and lovers: Experimental and correlational studies. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Personal Relationships, Groningen, Netherlands., , & (1994). A social skills approach to relationship maintenance: How individual differences in communication skills affect the achievement of relationship functions. In D. J.Canary & L.Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 61–90). New York: Academic Press., & (1992). Similarity in communication values as a predictor of friendship choices: Studies of friends and best friends. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 260–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949209372873, , & (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.(1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality, 1, 103–128., & (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287568, & (1990). Gender-specific pathways to intimacy in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01539442, , & (1987). Appropriateness and effectiveness perceptions of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research, 14, 93–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00123.x, & (1990). Attribution biases and associations between conflict strategies and competence outcomes. Communication Monographs, 57, 139–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376191, & ([Page 208]1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J.Canary & L.Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 3–22). New York: Academic Press., & (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10, 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099309359913, , , & (1986). The feminization of love. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11, 692–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494272(1981). A developmental exploration of friendship functions in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 456–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00586.x, , & (1950). Neighborhood interaction in a homogeneous community. American Sociological Review, 15, 357–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2087177, & (1936). How to win friends and influence people. New York: Simon & Schuster.(1978). The matching hypothesis: Physical attractiveness among same-sexed friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 240–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400213, & (1981). The influence of shyness on loneliness in a new situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 572–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616728174008, & (1981). Noncomparability of benefits given and received: A cue to the existence of friendship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 375–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3033907(1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.52, & (1974). A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. In T. L.Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 143–170). New York: Academic Press., & (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457, & (1987, August). Sex role orientation and personal relationships. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Conference, New York., & (1977). The social skill model and interpersonal attraction. In S.Duck (Ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 319–338). London: Academic Press.(1972). Self-disclosure, reciprocity and liking. Sociometry, 35, 151–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786555(1977). What is a friend?New Society, 20, 116–117.(1985, January). Cities won't drive you crazy. Psychology Today, pp. 46–53.(1984). Perceptions of the peer group and friendship in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 4, 155–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431684042004, , & ([Page 209]1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York: Basic Books., & (1991). Sexuality and communication in close relationships. In K.McKinney & S.Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 93–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (Eds.). (1994). The dark side of interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.1974). The effects of perceived and actual similarity in values and personality in the process of interpersonal attraction. Quality and Quantity, 8, 27–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00205863, & (1986). Believing another likes or dislikes you: Behaviors making the beliefs come true. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 284–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2064, & (1967). Increased liking as a result of the anticipation of personal contact. Human Relations, 20, 29–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872676702000103, & (1982). Friendship: Communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 8, 809–822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287852, & (1981). The therapeutic value of friendship between women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 495–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00589.x, & (1981). Implications for interaction versus effectance as mediators of the similarity-attraction relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 96–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2881%2990009-3(1979). Consequences of responsiveness in dyadic interaction: Effects of probability of response and proportion of content-related responses on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 534–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.114, & (1976). Self-disclosure in an acquaintance exercise: Responsibility for level of intimacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 787–792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1687(1982). Friendship and love relationships. In K. E.Davis & T.Mitchell (Eds.), Advances in descriptive psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 79–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI., & (1985). Assessing friendships: Prototypes, paradigm cases and relationship description. In S.Duck & D.Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 17–38). London: Sage., & (1973). Intimate relations. New York: Free Press.(1976). Friendship and disclosure reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 578–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1248, , & (1985). Friendship and the development of self-schemas: The effects of talking about others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 399–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167285114006, & (1991). The relations among talking, liking, and similarity between friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 406–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167291174008, , , & ([Page 210]1982). Children's knowledge of a best friend: Fact or fancy?Developmental Psychology, 18, 787–794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1997, & (1981). Friendship over the life cycle. In S.Duck & R.Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships: Vol. 2. Developing personal relationships (pp. 91–122). London: Academic Press., & (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.106, & (1987). Strategies for maintaining and repairing marital relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 143–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407587042003, & (1977). Friendship. In E.Donelson & J. E.Gullahorn, Women: A psychological perspective (pp. 154–167). New York: John Wiley., & (1982). A topography of relationship disengagement and dissolution. In S.Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships: Vol. 4. Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 1–30). London: Academic Press.(1994). Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In D. J.Canary & L.Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 45–60). New York: Academic Press.(1978). I liked you but I can't live with you: A study of lapsed friendships. Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.19188.8.131.52, & (1978). Personality similarity and the development of friendship: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 237–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00272.x, & (1986). Charting the development of personal relationships. In R.Gilmour & S.Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 133–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (1991). Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships: All communications are not created equal. Human Communication Research, 18, 228–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00545.x, , , & (1993). Reexamining gender differences in same-gender friendships: A close look at two kinds of data. Sex Roles, 28, 709–727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289989, & (1973a). Personality similarity and friendship choice: Similarity of what, when?Journal of Personality, 41, 543–558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1973.tb00110.x(1973b). Similarity and perceived similarity of personal constructs as influences in friendship choice. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1973.tb00839.x(1976). Spatial ecology: Its effects on the choice of friends and enemies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 505–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2876%2990030-5, , & (1980). Interpersonal satisfaction and level of involvement: A curvilinear relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 460–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2060([Page 211]1993). Gender differences in best friendship. Sex Roles, 29, 497–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289323, & (1868). Friendship. In R. W.Emerson, The complete works of Ralph Waldo Emerson (Vol. 1, pp. 80–92). London: Bell & Daldy.(1986). Friendship selection: Developmental and environmental influences. In E. C.Mueller & C. R.Cooper (Eds.), Process and outcome in peer relationships (pp. 129–160). New York: Academic Press.(1985). Similarity of attitudes and constructs in children's friendships. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 470–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965%2885%2990078-5(1985–1986). Friendship between men. Marriage and Family Review, 9, 163–197.(1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.117(1993). How do I love thee …? Let me consult my prototype. In S.Duck (Ed.), Understanding personal relationships: Vol. 1. Individuals in relationships. (pp. 87–120). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1994). Prototype-based assessment of laypeople's views of love. Personal Relationships, 1, 309–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00068.x(Prototype and script analyses of laypeople's knowledge of anger. In G. J. O.Fletcher & J.Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures and interaction in close relations: A social psychological approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (in press).1985). The family as a social network and support system. In L.L'Abate (Ed.), Handbook of family psychology and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 323–356). Homewood, IL: Dorsey., & (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 425–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1685, & (1981). Perceived and actual locus of control similarity among friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 85–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616728171013, , & (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper., , & (1986). Friendships in the work place. In V. J.Derlega & B. A.Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 185–206). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_10(1982a). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1982b). What do we mean by “friend”? An inductive study. Social Network, 3, 287–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733%2882%2990004-1(1977). Network and places: Social relations in the urban setting. New York: Free Press., , , , , & ([Page 212]1982). Who is alone? Social characteristics of people with small networks. In L. A.Peplau & D.Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 21–39). New York: Wiley Interscience., & (1981). Sex roles and intimacy in same sex and other sex relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 444–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00585.x, & (1979). You always hurt the one you love: Strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict. Communication Quarterly, 27, 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463377909369319, & (1977). Friendship and social responsiveness in boys and girls. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 401–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1241, , & (1980). Friends and strangers: The social experience of living in urban and non-urban settings. Journal of Social Issues, 36, 52–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1980.tb02035.x(1988). Nonverbal skill, personal charisma, and initial attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 203–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167288141020, , & (1982). Children's friendships. In T. M.Field, A.Huston, H. C.Quay, L.Troll, & G. E.Finley (Eds.), Review of human development (pp. 327–339). New York: John Wiley.(1983). Developmental changes in young children's conceptions of friendship. Child Development, 54, 549–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130041, & (1984). Children's conceptions of friendship: A multimethod study of developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 20, 925–931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1995, & , (1994). Exchange of respect-denying behaviors among male-female friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 5–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407594111001(1988). Narrative and the self as relationship. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 17–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960223-3, & (1983). Differential stability of reciprocal friendships and unilateral relationships among preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 169–177., & (1986). Conversations of college roommates: Similarities and differences in male and female friendship. In J. M.Gottman & J. G.Parker (Eds.), Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development (pp. 241–291). New York: Cambridge University Press., & (1988). Personalization patterns in developing, stable, and deteriorating relationships. The Communicator, 16, 61–81., & (1986). Self-promotion is not ingratiating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 106–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.52, , & (1981). Continuities and discontinuities in the friendship descriptions of women at six stages in the life cycle. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 103, 153–167., , , & ([Page 213]1977). Self-disclosure: A comparative study of reports by self and others. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 24, 365–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0184.108.40.2065, & (1975). Social interaction, social competence, and friendship in children. Child Development, 46, 709–718. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1128569, , & (1983). How children become friends. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48(3, Serial No. 201). http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1165860(1987). Speaking of friendship: Middle-class women and their friends. New York: Greenwood., & (1983). Equity and equality as clues to the relationship between exchange participants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 195–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420130209(1990). Friends forever: A longitudinal exploration of intimacy in same-sex pairs and platonic pairs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 29–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071002, & (1983). Gender and sex-role differences in intimacy of self-disclosure. Psychological Reports, 53, 891–897. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.19220.127.116.111, & (1982). Reported topics of conversation among same-sex adults. Communication Quarterly, 30, 332–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463378209369469, & (1981). Blabbermouths and clams: Sex differences in self-disclosure in same-sex and cross-sex friendship dyads. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 385–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00581.x(1978). Classroom effects on change in children's friendships. Sociology of Education, 51, 270–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112365, & (1991, June). Friendship status and friendship quality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Calgary, Alberta, Canada., , & (1977). Friendship as an accomplishment: An ethogenic approach to social relationships. In S.Duck (Ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 339–354). New York: Academic Press.(1975). The origins of friendships. In M.Lewis & L. A.Rosenblum (Eds.), Friendship and peer relations (pp. 11–26). New York: John Wiley.(1988). Conflict and the friendship relations of young children. Child Development, 59, 1590–1600. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130673, , , & (1981). Intimate relationships: Aperspective from equity theory. In S. W.Duck & R.Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships: Vol. 1. Studying personal relationships (pp. 165–178). London: Academic Press., & (1985). Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. In W.Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 91–117). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_5, , , , & ([Page 214]1979). Equity theory and intimate relationships. In R. L.Burgess & T. L.Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 99–133). New York: Academic Press., , & (1980). Friends and enemies: Cognitive bases for preschool children's unilateral and reciprocal relationships. Child Development, 51, 1276–1279. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1129572, , & (1984). The development and maintenance of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 75–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407584011005(1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1689(1988). Friendship. In S. W.Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 391–408). New York: John Wiley.(1989). The day-to-day functioning of close versus casual friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 21–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026540758900600102(1986). Social network development and functioning during a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 305–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1245, & (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10628-000(1987). Prototypes of intimacy and distance in same-sex and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 195–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407587042006, , & (1981). Sex differences in effects of social and value similarity in same-sex friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 488–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1998, & (1979). Towards understanding relationships. London: Academic Press.(1980). Children's friendship concepts and the perceived cohesiveness of same-sex friendship dyads. Psychological Reports, 47, 191–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.19188.8.131.52(1978). Residential satisfaction and friendship formation in high- and low-rise student housing: An interactional analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 237–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206, & (1978). Social satisfaction and friendship formation as a function of floor level in high-rise student housing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 527–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.527, , , & (1985). Intimacy in conversational style as a function of the degree of closeness between members of a dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 671–681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.111(1988). Development of intimate conversation in close relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 49–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1918.104.22.168, & (1983). Patterns of friendship. Child Development, 54, 1041–1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1129908([Page 215]1982). From gregariousness to intimacy: Marriage and friendship over the adult years. In T. M.Field, A.Huston, H. C.Quay, L.Troll, & G. E.Finley (Eds.), Review of human development (pp. 471–484). New York: John Wiley.(1984). Good company: The sociological implications of friendship. Sociological Review, 32, 696–715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00831.x(1983a). The talk of women friends. Women's Studies International Forum, 6, 353–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395%2883%2990027-4, & (1983b). Conversational patterns among same-sex pairs of late-adolescent close friends. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 142, 225–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1983.10533514, & (1989). Variables associated with friendship in an adult population. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 379–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9712054(1982). Couple involvement and network structure: A test of the dyadic withdrawal hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 34–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3033672, & (1985). Persuasive appeals and responses to appeals among friends and acquaintances. Child Development, 56, 757–763. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1129764(1991). Friendship satisfaction and gender: An examination of sex differences in contributors to friendship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 167–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082002(1990). Sex roles and friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 23, 133–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289861, , & (1994). Betrayal in relationships. In A. L.Weber & J. H.Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 243–262). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon., & (1986). Shyness, social behavior, and relationships. In W. H.Jones, J. M.Cheek, & S. R.Briggs (Eds.), Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment (pp. 227–238). New York: Plenum., & (1976). The behaviour of children during a first encounter. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 17, 15–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1976.tb00206.x(1978a). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226792(1978b). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 306–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1246(1973). Information integration theory and reinforcement theory as approaches to interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 301–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035112, & (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley., & (1962). Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. American Sociological Review, 27, 295–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2089791, & (1974). Physical appearance cues and interpersonal attraction in children. Child Development, 43, 305–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1127949, , & (1977). Meaning and void: Inner experience and the incentives in people's lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.([Page 216]1977). Factors in the determination of intimate same-sex friendship. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 131, 83–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1977.10533276, & (Knapp, M. L. (Ed.). (1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.(1980). Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms. Communication Monographs, 47, 262–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758009376036, , & (1981). Interpersonal engagement in social perception: The consequences of getting into the action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 990–999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1990, & (1978). Friendship in adolescence: Value and behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 143–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350615, & (1970). Friendships and friendly relations. In G. J.McCall, M. M.McCall, N. K.Denzin, G. D.Suttles, & S. B.Kurth (Eds.), Social relationships (pp. 136–170). Chicago: Aldine.(1977). Testing a multidimensional approach to friendship. In S.Duck (Ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 249–270). London: Academic Press.(1979). A developmental study of the meaning of friendship in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 2, 201–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971%2879%2980012-3(1982). Rules and rituals in disengaging from relationships. In S.Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships: Vol. 4. Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 189–210). London: Academic Press.(1987). Friendship expectations. In R.Burnett, P.McChee, & D. D.Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation and knowledge (pp. 134–157). London: Methuen.(1985). Friendship and adultery. Social Inquiry, 55, 310–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1985.tb00866.x(1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging, 1, 117–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-79188.8.131.52, , & (1988). Precious moments with family members and friends. In R. M.Milardo (Ed.), Families and social networks (pp. 107–126). Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1990). Effect of anticipated interaction on liking: An individual difference analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 357–367., & (1984). Self-disclosure: Intimate and nonintimate disclosures to parents and best friends as a function of Bem sex-role category. Sex Roles, 11, 735–744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288124, & (1994). From social attraction to relationship: Similarity, commonality, and self-referent support in friendships. Unpublished manuscript, University of Manchester, Department of Psychology, Manchester, UK.(1982). A model for the role of similarity of values in friendship development. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 301–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1982.tb00552.x, & ([Page 217]1995). Love at first byte: Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T.Wood & S.Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197–233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (1987). Temporary and long-term friendships in hearing and deaf preschoolers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 515–533., , , & (1985). Changes in mothers' social networks and social support following divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 663–673. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352267, & (1974). A three-level approach to attraction: Toward an understanding of pair relatedness. In T. L.Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 99–120). New York: Academic Press.(1979). A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. In G.Levinger & O. C.Moles (Eds.), Divorce and separation: Context, causes and consequences (pp. 37–63). New York: Basic Books.(1980). Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 510–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2880%2990056-6(1983). Development and change. In H. H.Kelley, E.Berscheid, A.Christensen, J. H.Harvey, T. L.Huston, G.Levinger, E.McClintock, L. A.Peplau, & D. R.Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 315–359). New York: W. H. Freeman.(1972). Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press., & (1981). Friendship dilemmas and the intersection of social worlds: Re-entry women on the college campus. Research in the Interweave of Social Roles: Friendship, 2, 143–170.(1975). The beginning of friendship. In M.Lewis & L. A.Rosenblum (Eds.), Friendship and peer relations (pp. 27–66). New York: John Wiley., , , & (1972). A developmental framework for the analysis of premarital dyadic formation. Family Process, 11, 17–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1972.00017.x(1989). Just being friendly means a lot—Women, friendship, and aging. In L.Grau & I.Susser (Eds.), Women in the later years: Health, social, and cultural perspectives (pp. 139–159). New York: Harrington Park.(1981). Sex-role stereotyping and patterns of self-disclosure. Sear Roles, 7, 403–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288068, & (1961). Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 408–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0041109, & (1974). The role of reward in the formation of positive interpersonal attitudes. In T. L.Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 171–192). New York: Academic Press., & (1960). The formation of positive attitudes toward group members. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 297–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0045778, & ([Page 218]1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513(1986). Friendships through the life course: Oral biographies in old age. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1976). Friendship duration and responses to attitudinal agreement-disagreement. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 377–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1976.tb00049.x, & (1994). A longitudinal analysis of sibling relationships as mediators of the link between family processes and youths' best friendships. Family Relations, 43, 400–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585371, , & (1971). Proximity and social interaction in residence halls. Journal of College Student Personnel, 12, 26–31., & (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513, & (1986). Strategies in developing friendships. In V. J.Derlega & B. A.Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 129–143). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_7, & (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 162–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3033649(1983). Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 964–976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2064, , & (1986). Fudging with friends and lying to lovers: Deceptive communication in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 495–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407586034006, , & (1982). Communication in dissolving relationships. In S.Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships: Vol. 4. Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 127–154). London: Academic Press., & (1991). Women's and men's scripts for interpersonal conflict. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00475.x(1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.114, , & (1982). Assumed similarity between self and other: Effect of expectation of future interaction with that other. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 100–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3033932, & (1983). Men and friendship. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.(1982). Communal and exchange relationships. In L.Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 121–144). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage., & (1992). Meanings of intimacy in cross- and same-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 277–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407592092007([Page 219]1993). Levels of perspectives and the perception of intimacy in cross-sex friendships: A balance theory explanation of shared perceptual reality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 529–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407593104004, , & (1994). Challenges confronting cross-sex friendships: “Much ado about nothing?”Sex Roles, 31, 55–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01560277, , & (1982). Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 395–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2882%2990062-2, & (1985). “‘Cause Duncan's me mate”: A comparison of reported relations with mates and with friends in Australia. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 283–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1985.tb00691.x, & (1971). A theory of marital choice and its applicability to marriage adjustment. In B. I.Murstein (Ed.), Theories of attraction and love (pp. 100–151). New York: Springer.(1986). The relationship of exchange-orientation to friendship intensity, roommate compatibility, anxiety, and friendship. Small Group Behavior, 17, 3–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649648601700101, & (1973–1974). Aristotle and friendship: A factor-analytic study. Interpersonal Development, 4, 21–34., & (1975). Similarity and propinquity in friendship formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 205–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.168, & (1982). Strong but not silent: A reexamination of expressivity in the relationships of men. Sex Roles, 8, 159–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287920, & (1981). Functional similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 427–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566%2881%2990039-8, & (1983). Structural similarity in the acquaintance process. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 146–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1922.214.171.124, & (1982). Mutuality in boys' friendship relations. Child Development, 53, 392–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1128981, & (1959). Individual systems of orientation. In S.Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 384–422). New York: McGraw-Hill.(1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13156-000(1971). Dyadic balance as a source of clues about interpersonal attraction. In B. I.Murstein (Ed.), Theories of attraction and love (pp. 31–45). New York: Springer.(1992). Friendships between women: A critical review. New York: Guilford.(1989). Best friends and marriage: Exchange among women. Berkeley: University of California Press.([Page 220]1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21, 525–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289102(1994). Cross-sex friendship's opportunity challenge: Uncharted terrain for exploration. Personal Relationship Issues, 2, 4–7.(1993, June). Gender differences and correspondence between members of same-sex friendships. Paper presented at the International Network on Personal Relationships Conference, Milwaukee, WI., & (1988). That's what friends are for: The determinants of psychological helping. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 34–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.19126.96.36.199, , & (1986). Becoming friends: Conversational skills for friendship formation in young children. In J. M.Gottman & J. G.Parker (Eds.), Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development (pp. 103–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1964). Type of work, friendship patterns, and leisure. Human Relations, 17, 215–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872676401700302(1991). The role of social context in the dynamics of personal relationships. In W. H.Jones & D.Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 2, pp. 1–34). London: Jessica Kingsley., & (1985). The physical attractiveness phenomena. New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0202-6(1984). Functional components of reciprocity and their influences on maintaining and sustaining closest friendships. Acta Psychiatrica Belgica, 84, 505–510., & (1986). The influence of functional components of reciprocity of maintaining and sustaining closest friendships. Journal of Psychological Researches, 30, 83–87., & (1990, June). You bug me: A preliminary report on hassles in three types of relationships. Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association Convention, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.(1986). Theories of friendship: The analysis of interpersonal attraction. In V. J.Derlega & B. A.Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 9–40). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_2, & (1987). The development of intimate relationships. In D.Perlman & S.Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 13–42). Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1971). The effects of picture content and exposure frequency on evaluations of Negroes and Whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 503–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2871%2990012-6, & (1979). Social interaction in young children: Initiation of peer contact. Psychological Reports, 45, 489–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.19188.8.131.529(1993). Friends' and acquaintances' conversations II: Coded differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 339–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407593103003([Page 221]1992). Friends' and acquaintances' conversations I: Perceived differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 483–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407592094002, & (1989). Men and women cannot be friends. In N.Bernardo & T.O'Neill (Eds.), Male/female roles (pp. 213–217). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.(1976). Sex differences in intimate friendships of old age. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 739–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350693, & (1986). Assessment of children's friendships: Implications for social competence and social adjustment. Advances in Behavioral Assessment of Children and Families, 2, 121–149., & (1989). Young adult relationships: Siblings and friends. Journal of Psychology, 123, 237–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1989.10542978(1989). “We were just talking …”: Conversations in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 567–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02139074, & (1979). Implicit theories of relationship: An intergenerational study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 645–661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2065, & (1983a). Negotiating close friendship: The dialectic of conjunctive freedoms. Human Communication Research, 9, 255–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00698.x(1983b). Openness as problematic in ongoing friendships: Two conversational dilemmas. Communication Monographs, 50, 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758309390150(1992). Friendship matters. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.(1993). Communication in cross-sex friendships. In A.Arliss & D.Borisoff (Eds.), Women and men communicating: Challenges and changes (pp. 51–70). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.(1994). Being there and growing apart: Sustaining friendships through adulthood. In D. J.Canary & L.Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 275–294). New York: Academic Press.(1992). Self-disclosure in men's friendships: Variations associated with intimate relations. In P. M.Nardi (Ed.), Men's friendships (pp. 132–152). Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1988). Gender effects in social participation: Intimacy, loneliness, and the conduct of social interaction. In R.Gilmour & S.Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 91–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.(1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: Further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204–1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.114, , & ([Page 222]1982). Physical attractiveness in social interaction: II. Why does appearance affect social experience?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 979–996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1689, , , , , & (1979). Anatomy of friendship. New York: Irvington.(1990). Intimacy in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles, 23, 65–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289880(1980). The significance of best-friend relationships in adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 536–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807%28198010%2917:4%3C536::AID-PITS2310170420%3E3.0.CO;2-I, & (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 649–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1249(1989). Friendships in later life: Definitions and maintenance patterns. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 9–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/TQ6K-MATH-8UJT-B265, & (1986). Friendships of older men and women: Exchange patterns and satisfaction. Psychology and Aging, 1, 103–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-79126.96.36.199, & (1987). Friendships in late life: A rural-urban comparison. Lifestyles, 8, 146–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01555768, & (1982). Non-engagement, failure to engage, and disengagement. In S.Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships: Vol. 4. Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 31–49). London: Academic Press.(1989). Strains in older adults' friendships. In R. G.Adams & R.Blieszner (Eds.), Older adult friendship (pp. 166–194). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1987). Close relationships: Ties that heal or ties that bind? In W. H.Jones & D.Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: A research annual (Vol. 1, pp. 1–35). Greenwich, CT: JAI., & (1984). How friendships end: Patterns among young adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 267–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407584013001(1985). Same- and cross-sex friendships and the psychology of homosociality. Sex Roles, 12, 63–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288037(1986). Keeping and ending casual, close and best friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 275–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407586033002, & (1986). Racetrack buddy relations: Compartmentalized and satisfying. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 441–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407586034003(1986). The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1156–1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.526(1984). Choosing to be open: An empirical investigation of subjective reasons for self-disclosing. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 326–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570318409374168, & (1986). Same-sex patterns and sex differences in the trust-value basis of children's friendship. Sex Roles, 15, 613–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288218(1986). The development of the norm of the reciprocity of self-disclosure and its function in children's attraction to peers. Child Development, 57, 1349–1357. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130414, & ([Page 223]1988). Children's restrictive disclosure to friends. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 203–215., & (1985). Just friends. New York: Harper & Row.(1986). On men and friendship. Psychoanalytic Review, 73, 165–181.(1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0029841(1973). Liking and loving. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.(1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 233–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031%2875%2980025-4(1980). Children's friendships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1978). Friendship, proximity, and self-disclosure. Journal of Personality, 46, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00599.x, & (1980a). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2880%2990007-4(1980b). Satisfaction and commitment in friendships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 11, 96–105.(1994). Fuzzy concepts in a fuzzy hierarchy: The varieties of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 186–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206, & (1982). The ties that bind: The effect of clustering on dyadic relationships. Social Networks, 4, 117–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733%2882%2990029-6(1988). Friendship and gender: Perspectives of professional men and women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 387–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407588054001(1987). Self-disclosure in everyday life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 365–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026540758700400307, & (1978). The deterioration of interpersonal relationships: Contributive and preventive communication. In Interpersonal communication: A question of needs (pp. 270–293). New York: H. M. Rogers., & (1974). Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 654–657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0037446(1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic Press.(1982). Conceptions of friendship and interaction between friends: An organismic-developmental perspective. In F. C.Serafica (Ed.), Social-cognitive development in context (pp. 100–132). London: Methuen.(1977). Friends and helpers: When ties dissolve. Small Group Behavior, 8, 469–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649647700800406([Page 224]1981). Girlfriend, boyfriend: Age and sex differences in intimate friendship. Developmental Psychology, 17, 800–808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.110, , & (1981). Do friends share and communicate more than non-friends?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4, 45–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016502548100400104, & (1985). Transition to college: Network changes, social skills, and loneliness. In S.Duck & D.Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 193–219). London: Sage., , & (1986). The effects of relationship type, partner intent, and gender on the selection of relationship maintenance strategies. Communication Monographs, 53, 352–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376149, & (1989). The influence of gender on same-sex friendships. In C.Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 10. Close relationships (pp. 164–186). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior?Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 66–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786985, & (1975). Life-cycle variations in patterns of close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 813–821. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350834(1980a). Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47, 180–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758009376031(1980b). The sequential and distributional structure of conflict interactions as a function of attributions concerning the locus of responsibility and stability of conflicts. Ir. D.Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 217–235). Edison, NJ: Transaction.(1984). Similarity and complementarity of attributes in friendship formation. Indian Psychologist, 3, 93–103., & (1986). People without friends: Loneliness and its alternatives. In V. J.Derlega & B. A.Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 227–246). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_12(1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press., & (1989). Handbook of interpersonal competence research. New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3572-9, & (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of perceived communication for romantic and friendship attraction experienced during a get-acquainted date. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 391–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167294204006, & (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082004, & ([Page 225]1981). Property rights, deservingness, reciprocity, friendship: The transactional character of children's sharing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 271–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1681, & (1981). Gender and sex roles as predictors of self-disclosure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 510–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-022.214.171.1240, , & (1987). Friendship networks in transitions: Married mothers return to school. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 445–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407587044004(1989). Covert intimacy: Closeness in men's friendships. In B. J.Risman & P.Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships (pp. 71–86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.(1992). Men's friendships with women: Intimacy, sexual boundaries, and the informant role. In P. M.Nardi (Ed.), Men's friendships (pp. 153–171). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1983). Initial interaction between strangers and acquaintances: A multivariate analysis of factors affecting choice of communication partners. Human Communication Research, 10, 27–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00003.x(1990). Gender differences in topical coherence: Creating involvement in best friends' talk. Discourse Processes, 13, 73–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544747(1988). Friendship bonds in adolescence. Adolescence, 23, 127–136., & (1983). Review of friendship development across the life span. Human Development, 26, 266–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000272888(1983). Friendship concepts of young adults in two age groups. Journal of Psychology, 115, 7–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1983.9923591, & (1980). Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don't always help the one you like. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 582–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2880%2990060-8, & (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley., & (1982). Gender differences in adolescent interpersonal identity formation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 479–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01538808, & (1986). Sexuality and gender in children's daily worlds. Social Problems, 33, 176–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800703, & (1980). Male friendship and intimacy across the life span. Family Relations, 29, 273–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/583846(1977). Coming to like obnoxious people when we must live with them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 200–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.199, & (1981). The environmental context of children's friendships: An empirical and conceptual examination of the role of child density. In A. E.Osterberg, C. P.Tiernan, & R. A.Findlay (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 216–224). Ames, IA: Environmental Design Research Association.([Page 226]1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56, 576–597.(1994). Men, women, and friendship: What they say, what they do. Gender & Society, 8, 246–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124394008002007(1976). Self-disclosure in friendship. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 735–742. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.19188.8.131.525, & (1984). American men's friendships: Self-reports on meaning and changes. Journal of Psychology, 116, 179–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1984.9923635, , & (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon., , & (1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 82–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206, , & (1975). Life course perspectives on friendship. In M. F.Lowenthal, M.Turner, D.Chiriboga & Associates (Eds.), Four stages of life (pp. 48–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., & (1969). The fund of sociability. Transaction, 6, 36–43.(1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Z.Rubin (Ed.), Doing unto others: Joining, molding, conforming, helping, loving (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.(1985). Domestic work, paid work and net work. In S.Duck & D.Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships (pp. 159–191). London: Sage.(1992). Men in networks: Private communities, domestic friendships. In P. M.Nardi (Ed.), Men's friendships (pp. 74–114). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1987). Friendship and dating relationships among French adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 10, 269–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971%2887%2980004-0(1979). Similarity of activity preferences among friends: Those who play together stay together. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 62–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3033874, & (1989). Collectivism-individualism in everyday social life: The middle kingdom and the melting pot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 79–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.11, , & (1983). Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 943–953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1683, , & (1991). Computer talk: Long-distance conversations by computer. Written Communication, 8, 56–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088391008001004(1985). Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 12, 587–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288179(1994). Relationship rejuvenation. In D. J.Canary & L.Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 255–273). New York: Academic Press.([Page 227]1983). Reciprocal framing of relationship definitions and episodic interaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 205–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570318309374118, & (1990). Language in friendships. In H.Giles & W. P.Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 413–431). New York: John Wiley., & (1994). Relationship rejuvenation: Arresting decline in personal relationships. In D.Conville (Ed.), Uses of structure in communication studies (pp. 103–124). Westport, CT: Praeger., & (1986). Sex differences in same-sex friendships. In V. J.Derlega & B. A.Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 81–99). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_5(1986). Friendship: Bonds and binds in a voluntary relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 191–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407586032005(1976). Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 409–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1249, , & (1985). Self-disclosure and reciprocity in conversation: A cross-national study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 97–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3033605(1993). In a different mode: Masculine styles of communicating closeness. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 279–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889309365372, & (1987). Women's networks: Strengthening the bonds of friendships between women. In K.Storrie (Ed.), Women: Isolation and bonding (pp. 59–76). Toronto, Ontario: Methuen., & (1976). Self-disclosure: An attributional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 184–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.199, , , & (1982). Men's friendships, women's friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287670(1984). Self-referent motivation and the intrinsic quality of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 115–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407584011007(1985). The Acquaintance Description Form. In S.Duck & D.Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 39–62). London: Sage.(1988). Interpreting research on gender differences in friendship: A case for moderation and a plea for caution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 367–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407588053006(1991). Gender role orientations and friendship: Some attenuation, but gender differences abound. Sex Roles, 24, 551–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288413, & (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(Monograph Suppl. No. 2, Pt. 2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025848(
About the Author[Page 240]
Beverley Fehr is Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Winnipeg. Her research has focused on lay conceptions of emotion, with an emphasis on the relationship-relevant emotions of love and anger. She also has published articles and book chapters on intimacy, social support, and commitment. Her current research on interaction patterns in close relationships is funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. She serves as Associate Editor for the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, is on the editorial board of Personal Relationships, and is organizing the 1996 International Society for the Study of Relationships conference.