Communicating Gender Diversity: A Critical Approach
Publication Year: 2007
“Shortlisted” for the IGALA Book Prize 2008
“Shortlisted” for the IGALA Book Prize 2008
“Communicating Gender Diversity succeeds in its goal of inviting readers into a conversation on the topic of gender and communication. Amongst the broad range of areas opened up to ongoing critical engagement, upper-level undergraduates may find a wealth of topics to pursue into further study —GENDER IN MANAGEMENT:AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Communicating Gender Diversity: A Critical Approach examines the variety of ways in which communication of and about gender enables and constrains people's intersectional identities. Authors Victoria Pruin DeFrancisco and Catherine Helen Palczewski place an emphasis not on how gender influences communication, but on how communication constitutes gender. Operating from a gender diversity perspective, Communicating Gender Diversity explores how gender is constructed through interpersonal and ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
Part I: Foundations
- Chapter 1: Developing a Critical Gender/Sex Lens
- Gender Differences: A Cultural Obsession
- A Critical Vocabulary or a New Lens Prescription
- Systems of Hierarchy
- Putting It All Together
- Chapter 2: Alternative Approaches to Understanding Gender/Sex
- Biological Approaches
- Brain Development
- Rhetorical Implications, Historic
- Rhetorical Implications, Contemporary
- Psychological Approaches
- Social Learning
- Cognitive Development
- Rhetorical Implications, Historic
- Rhetorical Implications, Contemporary
- Descriptive Cultural Approaches
- Symbolic Interactionism
- Two-Culture Theory
- Rhetorical Implications, Historic
- Rhetorical Implications, Contemporary
- Critical Cultural Approaches
- Standpoint Theory
- Social Constructionism
- Communication Strategies
- Gender as Performance
- Multiracial and Global Feminisms
- Queer Theory
- Rhetorical Implications, Historic
- Rhetorical Implications, Contemporary
- Chapter 3: Gendered/Sexed Voices
- Constructing a Critical Gender/Sex Lens
- Constructing Gender/Sex in Communication
- Gendered Conversational Styles
- Cultural Perceptions of Gender/Sex Styles and Speakers
- Power and Talk
- Chapter 4: Gendered/Sexed Bodies
- Gender Embodiment: Why Nonverbals Matter
- Power, Not Sex Difference
- Gender Performativity
- Objectification Theory
- Constructing a Critical Gender/Sex Lens
- Components of Nonverbal Communication
- Eye Contact
- Body Movement
- Body Adornment
- Facial Expressions
- Nonverbal Sensitivity and Accuracy
- Emotional Expression
- Gender as Body Performance
- Eating Disorders
- Refusing the Command Performance
- Using Norms Against Each Other
- Making Norms Visible
- Overtly Challenging Norms
- Revaluing the Body
- Chapter 5: Gendered/Sexed Language
- Theories Explaining the Power of Language
- Linguistic Relativity
- Terministic Screens
- Language as Power
- Language Can Be Used to Oppress and Subordinate
- He/Man Language
- Semantic Derogation
- Semantic Imbalance
- Semantic Polarization and Polar Opposites
- Marked and Unmarked Terms
- Lack of Vocabulary
- The Truncated Passive
- The Falsely Universal We
- The De-Verbing of Woman
- People, Places, and Topics of Silence
- Language as Violence
- Language as Resistance
- Talking Back
- Counterpublic Spheres
- Developing a New Language
- Strategic Essentialism and Rhetorics of Difference
- Moving Over
- Verbal Play
Part II: Institutions
- Chapter 6: An Introduction to Gender in Social Institutions
- What Is an Institution?
- Institutional Control and Hegemony
- Gender Is a Social Institution
- Institutionalized Gendered/Sexed Violence
- Part Preview
- Chapter 7: Family
- Family as a Social Institution
- Interlocking Institutions
- Family Constructs (And Constrains) Gender
- Research Focuses on the Nuclear Family
- Parent–Child Communication
- Adult Friends and Lovers
- Domestic Violence
- Emancipatory Families
- Chapter 8: Education
- Education as a Social Institution
- Interlocking Institutions
- It's Not About Sex Difference
- Education Constructs (And Constrains) Gender
- Teacher and Administrator Interactions
- Educational Materials and Curricula
- Higher Education
- Gender/Sex Gaps
- Single-Sex Education
- Peer Pressure
- Bullying and Sexual Harassment
- Sexual Violence on College Campuses
- Emancipatory Education
- Chapter 9: Work
- Work as a Social Institution
- Interlocking Institutions
- It's Not About Sex Difference
- Work Constructs (And Constrains) Gender
- Race, Gender, and Work: Black Women in Work Contexts
- Class, Race, Gender/Sex, and Work: Care Work
- Violence, Gender/Sex, and Work: Sexual Harassment
- Work as Liberation and Locations of Empowerment in Work
- Chapter 10: Religion
- Religion as a Social Institution
- Interlocking Institutions
- It's Not About Sex Difference
- Religion Constructs (And Constrains) Gender
- Rereading the History of Women Religious
- Religion Constructs Masculinity: Muscular Christianity
- Religion as Liberation and Locations of Empowerment in Religion
- Chapter 11: Media
- Media as a Social Institution
- Media Economics
- Media and Power
- Media and Hegemony
- Media Polyvalence and Oppositional Readings
- Interlocking Institutions
- It's Not About Sex Difference
- Differences Among Women
- Similarities Between Women and Men
- Media Construct (and Constrain) Gender
- Media Content and Media Effects
- The Gaze(s)
- An Oppositional Gaze
- Media as Always Liberatory and Constraining
- Gender Is Constructed and Thus Is Always in Flux
- Resecuring Genders' Borders: “Masculinity in Crisis”
- Progressive Representations Resecure Traditional Gender Norms: Mr. Mom and Ellen
- New Technologies Replicate Old Gender Norms
- Chapter 12: One Last Look Through a Critical Gendered Lens
[Page ii]This book honors the memory of our mothers:
Victoria DeFrancisco Leto (1924–2004)
Maj. Helen Mary Finks Palczewski (1921–1999)
Copyright © 2007 by Sage Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Sage Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
Sage Publications Ltd.
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative
Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044
Sage Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd
33 Pekin Street #02-01
Far East Square
Printed in the United States of America.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
DeFrancisco, Victoria L. (Victoria Leto)
Communicating gender diversity : a critical approach / Victoria Pruin DeFrancisco and Catherine Helen Palczewski.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4129-2559-4 (pbk.)
1. Sex role. 2. Gender identity. 3. Communication—Social aspects. 4. Communication—Sex differences. 5. Sexism in language. I. Palczewski, Catherine Helen. II. Title.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
07 08 09 10 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Acquiring Editor: Todd R. Armstrong
Editorial Assistant: Katie Grim
Marketing Manager: Amber Erzinger
Project Editor: Astrid Virding
Copyeditor: April Wells-Hayes
Typesetter: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Indexer: Juniee Oneida
Proofreader: Gillian Dickens
Cover Designer: Candice Harman
Welcome to our view of the state of the scholarship on communicating gender. We say our view to make the point that this textbook represents our best effort to be critical reviewers of existing knowledge on the topic, and because we want to clarify that our view is uniquely tied to the materials we have chosen to include, to our worldviews, and to the ways in which we make sense of the material. This view may differ from yours or from other textbooks' views. In fact, we hope it does.
Our purpose with this textbook is not to provide any final conclusions about communicating gender. Because gender is a constantly evolving concept, both in terms of individuals' gender identity development and the larger culture's predominant notions of gender, such absolute claims are not possible. Instead, our intent is to better equip readers with tools with which they can examine and make sense of the intersections of communication and gender.
To do so, we have attempted to write this book as an extended conversation in which we interact with the research on gender in communication that has most excited our own scholarly imaginations. As such, this book is not simply a review of research but rather an attempt to place the research in the context of larger theoretical, social, and political issues that we see emerging in the study of gender in communication. We hope this makes the material presented in the book more meaningful and useful for readers and relevant beyond the life of this publication.
This does not mean we only present research that is consistent with our preexisting views or academic disciplines. In fact, we believe people learn most by stepping outside their academic or personal comfort zones to consider other perspectives. We value engaged and vital disagreement, the push and pull of argumentation. We believe readers will be able to glean more from our presentation of substantiated arguments than they would if we pretended to present the research as if we were objective and value free. We will express our views of the material, and we hope this encourages you to do the same. Agreement is neither a necessary nor a preferred requirement for learning from this book, and disagreement is not a sign of disrespect.
Our approach to writing this text is the same as our approach to learning, teaching, and life: We advocate feminism. We believe that sex as a social category is one of the most important nexuses of power that are used to organize contemporary [Page xii]societies, and we believe that discrimination on the basis of gender and sex is one of the most violent forms of oppression. However, we also believe that many other social categories intersect within an individual's sex identity and with social relations of power.
That we subscribe to feminism does not mean we necessarily define it in the same way. In fact, this diversity is a quality of feminism. Feminism was proposed as an alternative to thinking in absolute, patriarchal truths. Consequently, it is important to make room for diverse feminist theories. For example, we honor the contributions of Black womanist theory, we celebrate the contradictions of third-wave feminism, and we happily navigate the tensions between global and post-modern feminisms, which you will learn about throughout the text.
While no single definition can represent all of feminist thought, we can offer some common qualities that we perceive as central. Feminisms challenge common cultural assumptions, such as the assumption that men should be mechanically inclined but women should not, and the assumption that women should be nurturers but men should not. Feminisms recognize the contributions of persons and groups historically undervalued, such as the contributions of women, LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered) people, and persons of color. Feminisms reveal related cultural oppressions, such as the feminization of poverty and the racing of welfare dependency. Feminisms create new ways of thinking, such as appreciation of the value of narratives as opposed to ostensibly objective scientific methods. Feminisms work toward social change and social justice. Thus, our ultimate goal in writing this book is nothing less than intellectual activism. These two terms often are perceived as opposites, polarized along the lines of theory and action—but we see them as inextricably involved in the creation of a world that is more welcoming of women and men who diverge from expected sex roles and gender norms.
We do not shy away from complex and controversial subjects. We foreground a rejection of the sex binary, recognizing the existence of intersex people. We see heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, and queer sexualities as equally valid sexual orientations. We incorporate the insights of queer theory. We reject the differences and the two-culture approaches to communicating gender, making clear that one cannot understand how communicating gender operates without also recognizing the power dynamics involved. Finally, we make clear that one can never study gender or sex in isolation. How a particularly sexed body performs gender always intersects with other identity ingredients. Our hope is that even as we grapple with complex issues, we do so in an approachable way.
Given the complexity of the issues involved, this book is intended for upper-division undergraduate or lower-level graduate courses focusing on gender in communication. Our approach is interdisciplinary, in terms of both method and the literature cited. We meld humanistic/critical and social scientific approaches. Although we highlight communication studies literature, we also integrate scholarship from anthropology, literature, philosophy, political science, psychology, sociology, and gender and women's studies that has served as the foundation of communication scholarship.[Page xiii]Organization of the Book
The book is divided in two parts. “Part I: Foundations” includes five chapters that describe the theories and methods that guide the study of gender in communication. These chapters are meant to provide a heuristic vocabulary that enables people to study gender in communication with more subtlety and nuance. “Part II: Institutions” includes an introductory chapter to explain our focus on social institutions, followed by five chapters on the social institutions we think make most evident the intersections of gender and communication: family, education, work, religion, and media. In each chapter, we examine the ways in which individuals experience and enact gender within the institution (micro) and the ways in which the structures and predominant ideology of the institutions influence the experience and enactment of gendered lives (macro). The concluding chapter draws links between the preceding chapters and presents visions for future study.
To cover the topics in depth, the chapters are longer than may be customary in textbooks. Gender in communication is necessarily complex when approached from an intersectional gender diversity approach; thus, easy lists of differences are not an option. This is not meant to detour the reader. Instead, we anticipate that classes will spend multiple days reading and discussing each chapter. The headings in the table of contents and within each chapter provide ways to divide the reading. The instructor's manual offers further direction.
We also have chosen to forgo numerous illustrations, sidebars, diagrams, and insets. Although such additions almost seem de rigueur in textbooks, we would rather operate under the assumption that students will be engaged because of their interest in the topic. We also have attempted to keep our writing lively and to offer more and longer quotations from others so that the reader gets a sense of participating in a conversation populated by more than the textbook authors.Distinctive Features
If we had to summarize our approach to communicating gender in one sentence, we would say this: We study the variety of ways in which communication of and about gender and sex enables and constrains people's intersectional identities. We believe that people are social actors—and that, as such, they create meaning through their symbolic interactions. Thus, our emphasis is not on how gender influences communication but on how communication constitutes gender. We also believe that people are capable of being self-reflective about communication processes and creative in generating new ways to play with symbols. To study how people perform and construct genders and what factors influence these performances, we draw on seven principles that compose our approach to the study of communicating gender:
- Intersectionality. Persons are not just female or male, feminine or masculine. To more accurately study gender, we must study gendered lives in the context of [Page xiv]other social identities, particularly race, ethnicity, social class, sexual orientation, and national origin. Although research embracing this approach is still limited, it continues to grow, and we make a concerted effort to recognize diverse social influences on gender.
- Interdisciplinarity. We seek to fuse and balance social scientific, humanistic, and critical methods. Thus, we rely on quantitative, qualitative, rhetorical, and critical studies. As coauthors, we have the benefit of drawing on two fields of communication studies that often are seen as independent of each other but that we believe are inextricably linked: rhetoric and social science. Palczewski, trained as a rhetorical scholar, is an active debate coach who studies political controversies and social protest. DeFrancisco, trained as a social scientist, uses qualitative research methods to study how gender and related inequalities are constructed in interpersonal relationships and individuals' identities. Most texts on gender in communication focus on social science studies of gendered interpersonal interactions and thus fail to recognize the ways in which broader, public discourse can influence gender. Not only do we bridge methodological chasms within our own discipline, we do so between disciplines. We purposely look at each topic from multiple disciplinary and activist perspectives. The result is a richer, fuller understanding of the topic that stretches the boundaries of what is commonly considered relevant for a communication text.
- Gender diversity, not sex differences. We do not subscribe to typical conceptualizations of gender as a form of difference. Instead, we problematize the differences view by showing how it ignores power, reinforces stereotypes and related oppressions, fails to account for intersectionality, and is inconsistent with meta-analyses demonstrating that sex does not consistently account for differences in communication. However, our rejection of the differences approach does not mean that we deny differences exist. Instead, we seek to recognize an even richer diversity as a result of intersectionality and in the form of a gender diversity approach.
- Masculinity. The study of gender is not just the study of women. However, the study of gender has traditionally been considered a “women's issue,” hence researchers and textbooks often have focused almost exclusively on women and femininity, underemphasizing men and masculinities. Thanks to the recent growth in men's studies, we have at our disposal a rich literature base that considers gender and masculinity. In this textbook, we make a concerted effort to include masculinities, particularly in the chapters on work, media, and family.
- Gender is a performed social institution. Gender is something a person does, not something a person is. Gender is not something located within individuals; it is a social construct that institutions and individuals maintain (and occasionally challenge). Thus, we examine the microlevel—how an individual might perform gender—and the macrolevel—how social understandings of gender are performed on individuals. Given this attention to institutions, we also pay attention to the ways in which institutions intersect, not just to the ways identity ingredients intersect.[Page xv]
- Violence. To study gender in lived experiences means to study the darker side of gender: oppression and violence. We do not avoid or limit the discussion of gendered violence to one chapter. Rather, a range of specific social injustices are made visible in each chapter. We do so not to bash males (not all men abuse, and not only women are victims) but to more fully recognize the consequences of the prevalent gendered society in which most people live. Gendered violence is systemic in the form of domestic abuse, rape, and violence against LGBT people. By linking seemingly innocent, gendered practices to more overt forms of gendered violence, we are better able to move beyond superficial generalizations about gender differences and to make visible the struggles many women and men face in their unique cultural contexts.
- Emancipation. Even as we recognize violence, we also want to recognize the emancipatory potential of gendered practice. Gender identity need not be oppressive and limiting to persons. For each social institution addressed, we offer examples of how diverse groups of people have created strategies to free themselves of stereotypical gender and other cultural expectations.
We recognize that these guiding principles might require a substantial retooling of many courses. Thus, this textbook is accompanied by an instructor's manual that includes sample syllabi, possible assignments, and teaching aids. For each chapter, we provide a chapter outline, discussion questions, class activities, additional examples, full texts of significant paraphrased quotations, and media and Web resources. The manual also includes special “hot topics” essays that enable students to see how one might apply concepts introduced in the text to current issues.Some Author Admissions
Writing this book was challenging, exciting, fun, enlightening, frustrating, and hard, joyful work. DeFrancisco has taught courses and conducted research related to communicating gender since 1981; Palczewski has done so since 1987. Despite our collective years devoted to feminist studies of communication, we continually struggle to do it right. It is difficult to talk about gender without reinforcing stereotypes about it. Language and cultural perceptions of gender (the primary resources we have to communicate) fail us! As we discuss in Chapter 5, the very words female and male, woman and man, and the connotations associated with them encourage perceptions of individuals as only one or the other sex and as different and differentially valued in the predominant culture. The words also ignore intersex persons and the fact that men can be feminine, women can be masculine, or both. Additionally, there is no word to identify a person who marks all of her or his intersecting identity ingredients, making it difficult to constantly keep in mind that when one studies gender, one also must consider the ways in which multiple identities intersect and influence persons' lives. We have adopted the following strategies to try to compensate for some of the limitations of language and gendered cultural perceptions:[Page xvi]
- One often sees lists of multiple cultural group identities, such as race, class, gender, sex, and sexual orientation, as a reminder that the topic of study is not gender alone. However, it is impossible to recognize all group identities each time (e.g., physical ability, age, urban/rural, religion). Hence, the categories in the list shift across chapters according to the point we are trying to make.
- We use language that is inclusive of women and men throughout this text (e.g., people, persons, she and he, women and men, spouses). We take this a step further, adopting the suggestion of linguist M. J. Hardman (1999) to reverse the commonly used order of men first and women second, as in boys and girls, until, as Hardman says, the order “doesn't matter anymore” (p. 1).
- We try to avoid overgeneralizing about women and men. When we report on a study, we use phrases such as “the women and men in the study,” rather than “women and men” to make the point that claims cannot be generalized beyond the scope of the particular participants in the study being reported.
Ideally, our book embodies the changes currently emerging in the ever-transforming field of gender in communication. We hope it challenges the very way in which readers think about gender and sex, as well as the ways in which gender and sex intersect with race, class, sexual orientation, and nationality. Instead of providing simplistic answers, we hope this textbook provides guidance on how to ask good questions. We also hope this book will inspire present and future researchers to contribute to the study of gender in communication, further stretching the boundaries of culturally gendered perceptions.Acknowledgments
This book could not have been written without the assistance of our colleagues. People too numerous to list have helped us as we wrote this book, but a few deserve special note for the extra time they spent sharing resources, reading chapters, and providing invaluable research assistance. The chapters would not have been as grounded in current scholarship, and the examples would not have been as rich, had it not been for the following people: Nathan Epley, Michael Fleming, Tom Hall, Susan Hill, Kristin Mack, Karen Mitchell, Martha Reineke, and Mary Beth Stalp. We also thank M.A. students who worked as research assistants: Ruth Beerman, Danielle Dick, Danelle Frisbie, and Eric Short. Other students and colleagues served as universal resources, offering ideas and examples, checking facts, and other support: Rob Asen, Judith Baxter, Harry Brod, Dan Brouwer, April Chatham-Carpenter, Jeanne Cook, John Fritch, Shoko Hayashi, Kyle Kostelecky, Maria Mastronardi, Gayle Pohl, Alimatul Qibtiyah, Vickie Turner, Donna Uhlenhopp, Atun Wardatun, and Jayne Morgan Witte. We recognize that no book is created in isolation. We thank Julia Wood (Gendered Lives), Diane Ivy and Phil Backlund (Gender Speak), and Karlyn Kohrs Campbell (Man Cannot Speak for Her) for [Page xvii]helping pave the way in gender/sex in communication textbooks, as well as scholars whose work has informed the development of our own gendered lenses: Judith Butler, Patricia Hill Collins, Celeste Condit, bell hooks, Cheris Kramarae, Judy Pearson, Dale Spender, and Anita Taylor. We thank our life partners, Arnie Madsen and David Pruin, for their willing honoring of our need to have room of our own in which to write. We especially thank our SAGE editor, Todd Armstrong, for his continued trust. We also want to thank the skilled professionals who worked with us through the final stages of the publication process: Katie Grim (editorial assistant), Astrid Virding (project editor), and April Wells-Hayes (copyeditor). Support for the development of this book was provided in part by the University of Northern Iowa's Graduate College, the College of Humanities and Fine Arts, the Department of Communication Studies, and the Women's and Gender Studies Program.
SAGE Publications gratefully acknowledges the following reviewers:
Cynthia Berryman-Fink, University of Cincinnati; Derek T. Buescher, University of Puget Sound; Sandra L. Faulkner, Syracuse University; Lisa A. Flores, University of Utah; Jeffrey Dale Hobbs, The University of Texas at Tyler; Charlotte Kroløkke, University of Southern Denmark; D. K. London, Merrimack College; M. Chad McBride, Creighton University; and Lynn H. Turner, Marquette University.[Page xviii]
We have taken some liberties with APA reference style. To help readers see the contributions of both women and men to our subject, we have included first names of authors where known. We feel this recognition is important. Although we recognize the artificiality of sex distinctions and the complexity of identity, we also realize that no matter how artificial, identity categories do matter. As M. Jacqui Alexander and Chandra Talpade Mohanty (1997) note, even as postmodernist theories attempt to pluralize and dissolve “the stability and analytic utility of the categories race, class, gender, and sexuality …the relations of domination and subordination that are named and articulated through the processes of racism and racialization still exist, and they still require analytic and political specification and engagement” (p. xvii).2001). Alcohol and sexual assault. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Alcohol Health and Research World, 25(1). Retrieved April 24, 2006, from http://www.athealth.com/Practitioner/ceduc/alc_assault.html, , , , & (1996). Alcohol, misperception, and sexual assault: How and why are they linked? In David M.Buss & Neil M.Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 138–161). New York: Oxford University Press., , , & (1990, June). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002(1992). Gendered institutions: From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 565–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2075528(2005). Boys and men in families: The domestic production of gender, power, and privilege. In Michael S.Kimmel, JeffHearn, & Robert W.Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 230–248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233833, & (http://Adherents.com. (2005, August 28). Major religions of the world ranked by number of adherents. Retrieved December 27, 2005, from http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.htmlAdler, Leonore Loeb. (Ed.). (1991). Women in cross-cultural perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger.[Page 270]1991). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture. London: Routledge.(2003). Framing the bride: Globalizing beauty and romance in Taiwan's bridal industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2003, Spring). Maintaining power in the face of political, economic and social discrimination: The tale of Nigerian women. Women and Language, 26(1), 18–26.(Aguilar, Delia D., & Lacsamana, Anne E. (Eds.). (2004). Women and globalization. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.1995). The problem of speaking for others. In JudithRoof & RobynWeigman (Eds.), Who can speak? Authority and critical identity (pp. 97–119). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.(Alcoff, Linda, & Potter, Elizabeth. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Alexander, M. Jacqui, & Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. (Eds.). (1997). Introduction: Genealogies, legacies, movements. In Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures (pp. xiii–xlii). New York: Routledge.1995). “Diversity” and organizational communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 143–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889509365420(1996). Feminist standpoint theory: A Black woman's (re)view of organizational socialization. Communication Studies, 47(4), 257–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368482(1998). Black womanhood and feminist standpoints. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 575–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318998114004(2000). Constructing gender in families. In Robert M.Milardo & SteveDuck (Eds.), Families as relationships (pp. 1–17). Chichester, England: Wiley & Sons., & (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1998, , & (American Association of University Women. (1992). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America: A call to action. Washington, DC: Author.American Association of University Women. (1993). Hostile hallways: The AAUW survey on sexual harassment in America's schools. Washington, DC: Author.American Association of University Women. (1998). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: Author.American Association of University Women. (2001). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in schools. Washington, DC: Author.American Association of University Women. (2006). Drawing the line: Sexual harassment on campus. Washington, DC: Author.American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.2006). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender ((7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Allyn & Bacon.1998, August). Meta-analyses of gender effects on conversational interruption: Why, what, when, where, and how. Sex Roles, 39(3–4), 225–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018802521676, & (2004). Violence and abuse in families. In Anita L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 629–645). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., , & (1999). Woman: An intimate geography. New York: Anchor Books.([Page 271]1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.(1990). Bridge, drawbridge, sandbar or island: Lesbians-of-Color hacienda alianzas. In LisaAlbrecht & Rose M.Brewer (Eds.), Bridges of power: Women's multicultural alliances (pp. 216–231). Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.(2001, October 15). A nation challenged: News analysis: Nature of foe is obstacle in appealing for sacrifice. New York Times, p. B1.(1973). Some outstanding problems in the analysis of events. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of Social Anthropologists’ decennial conference, Oxford. Later published in Malcom Chapman (Ed.), The voice of prophecy and other essays/Edwin Ardener (pp. 105–108). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.(2005). Ardener's “muted groups”: The genesis of an idea and its praxis. Women and Language, 28(2), 50–54.(1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford University Press.(2006). Sex differences in interaction: A reexamination. In KathrynDindia & Daniel J.Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication ((2nd ed., pp. 21–36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.1990). Words. In The Telling It Book Collective (Ed.), Telling it: Women and language across cultures (pp. 23–30). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Press Gang Publishers.(As G.I. Joe bulks up, concern for the 98-pound weakling. (1999, May 30). New York Times, p. 2.2003). Women, work, welfare: A rhetorical history of images of poor women in welfare policy debates. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 6(2), 285–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rap.2003.0041(2003, January). “Slaves with white collars”: Persistent performances of masculinity in crisis. Text and Performance Quarterly, 23(1), 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462930310001602020, & (2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452229461, & (2005, Fall). Securing Afghan women: Neocolonialism, epistemic violence, and the rhetoric of the veil. NWSA Journal, 17(3), 112–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2005.17.3.112, & (2001). The complete fit or fat book: The phenomenal program that successfully guides you from fatness to fitness. New York: Galahad., & (2003). Bullying in schools and exposure to domestic violence. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 713–732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134%2803%2900114-5(2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In JenningsBryant & DolfZillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research ((2nd ed., pp. 121–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston., & (1991). Unsettling relations: The university as a site of feminist struggles. Boston: South End Press., , , , & (2004). Same difference: How gender myths are hurting our relationships, our children, and our jobs. New York: Basic Books., & (1988). Communication and the sexes. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.(1997). Communication and the sexes (, & (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.2002). Jokers in the pack: Why boys are more adept than girls at speaking in public settings. Language and Education, 16(2), 81–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500780208666821([Page 272]2003). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave, Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230501263(2006). Putting gender in its place: A case study on constructing speaker identities in a management meeting. In M.Barrett & M. J.Davidson (Eds.), Gender and communications at work (pp. 154–165). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.(1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press., & (2001). Gender, expletive use, and context: Male and female expletive use in structured and unstructured conversation among New Zealand university students. Women and Language, 24(1), 1–15., & (2006, Spring). Territories, identities, and thresholds: The Saturday mothers phenomenon in Istanbul. Signs, 31(3), 689–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/498986, & (1995, March 27). Gray matters. Newsweek, pp. 48–54., & (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books., , , & (2003, October 26). The opt-out revolution [Electronic version]. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/magazine/26WOMEN.html?ei=5007&en=02f8d75eb63908e0&ex=1382500800&partner=USERLAND&pagewanted=all&position(2004). Psychoanalytic theories of gender. In Alice H.Eagly, Anne E.Beall, & Robert J.Sternberg, (Eds.), The psychology of gender ((2nd ed., pp. 145–168). New York: Guilford Press.2005, July). Women-led firms and the gender gap in top executive jobs (Discussion Paper No. 1689). Bonn, Germany: The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://ftp.iza.org/dp1689.pdf(2004, January 12). Two fathers, with one happy to stay at home. The New York Times, p. 1.(1967, Winter). Civil religion in America. Daedalus, 96, 1–21.(1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036215(1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin Books.(1995, May). What does queer theory teach us about X?PMLA, 110(3), 343–349., & (1972). The future of marriage. New York: Bantam Books.(2004). Cultural diversity and cross-cultural perspectives. In Alice H.Eagly, Anne E.Beall, & Robert J.Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (, & (2nd ed., pp. 296–327). New York: Guilford Press.1992, Winter). Towards a transactional view of rhetorical and feminist theory: Rereading Helen Cixous's “The Laugh of the Medusa.”Southern Communication Journal, 57(2), 86–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949209372856(The Black Scholar. (Ed.). (1992). Court of appeal: The Black community speaks out on the racial and sexual politics of Thomas vs. Hill. New York: Ballantine Books.2000, Fall). Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 75–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.75, & (2003). Girl making: A cross-cultural ethnography on the processes of growing up female. New York: Berghahn Books.(2000, November). The new gender wars. Psychology Today, 33, 42.([Page 273]2003). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages ((4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.1997). Twilight zones: The hidden life of cultural images from Plato to O.J. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1999). The male body: A new look at men in public and private. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.(2003). Gender and nonverbal communication. In Larry A.Samovar & Richard E.Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (, & (10th ed., pp. 269–278). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.1995). Parenting infants. In Marc H.Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 3. Status and social conditions of parents (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.(2005, December). Are women opting out? Debunking the myth. Center for Economic and Policy Research. Retrieved March 6, 2006, from http://www.cepr.net/publications/opt_out_2005_11.pdf(Bradstock, Andrew, Gill, Sean, Hogan, Anne, & Morgan, Sue. (Eds.). (2000). Masculinity and spirituality in Victorian culture. New York: St. Martin's Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/97802302941652005). Gender: psychological perspectives ((4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.1999). Cat fights and gang fights: Preference for work in a male-dominated organization. The Sociological Quarterly, 40(3), 455–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb01729.x(1987). The case for men's studies. In HarryBrod (Ed.), The making of masculinities: The new men's studies (pp. 52–53). Boston: Allen & Unwin.(2003). A glossary of cultural theory ((2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.1997). Bitch [Music lyrics]. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.musicfanclubs.org/meredithbrooks/bitc.html, & (1998). The precarious visibility politics of self-stigmatization: The case of HIV/AIDS tattoos. Text and Performance Quarterly, 18, 114–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462939809366216(2005, December). Counterpublicity and corporality in HIV/AIDS zines. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 22(5), 351–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180500342860(1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomenon. In Esther N.Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56–89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., & (1992, August 17). Remarks by Republican presidential candidate Pat Buchanan. Republican National Convention. Retrieved October 6, 2006, from http://www.buchanan.org/pa-92-0817-rnc.html(1990, June). The affirmative character of U.S. cultural studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(2), 169–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360171, , & (2005). On the Mormon question: Race, sex, and polygamy in the 1850s and the 1900s. American Quarterly, 57, 75–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2005.0002(1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2000). Women across cultures: A global perspective. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.(Bush administration publicizes plight of Afghan women. (2001, November 16). Feminist Daily News Wire. Retrieved June 5, 2002, from http://www.feminist.org/news/newsbyte/uswirestory.asp?id=59482001–2002). Weekly compilation of presidential documents. Retrieved June 5, 2002, from http://www.frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/multidb.cgi([Page 274]2001, November 17). Radio address by Laura Bush to the nation. Retrieved June 5, 2002, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011117.html(1990a). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.(1990b). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In Sue-EllenCase (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 270–282). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.(1991). Imitation and gender insubordination. In DianaFuss (Ed.), Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories (pp. 13–31). New York: Routledge.(1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”New York: Routledge.(1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.(2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.(Buzzanell, Patrice M. (Ed.). (2000). Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2005, February). Struggling with maternity leave policies and practices: A poststructuralist feminist analysis of gendered organizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(1), 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000318495, & (Buzzanell, Patrice M., Sterk, Helen, & Turner, Lynn H. (Eds.). (2004). Gender in applied communication contexts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2005). Why we cannot conclude sexual orientation is a biological phenomenon. In J. KennethDavidson & Nelwyn B.Moore (Eds.), Speaking of sexuality ((2nd ed., pp. 245–248). Los Angeles: Roxbury.2005, May). His brain, her brain. Scientific American, 292(5), 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0505-40(2005). Don't bowl at night: Gender, safety, and civic participation. Signs, 30(2), 1607–1631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/382632(2004). Disrupting the dichotomy: “Yo soy Chincana/o?” in the New Latina/o South. The Communication Review, 7, 175–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714420490448705(1992). An/other silent voice? Representing “Hispanic woman” in organizational texts. In Albert J.Mills & PetaTancred (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 201–221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(2001). From ‘the woman's’ point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In Stewart R.Clegg, CynthiaHardy, & Walter N.Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 218–257). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (1996). The language-gender interface: Challenging co-optation. In Victoria L.Bergvall, Janet MuellerBing, & Alice F.Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice (pp. 31–53). London: Longman.(1997). Performing gender identity: Young men's talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In SallyJohnson & Ulrike HannaMeinhof (Eds.), Language and masculinity (pp. 47–64). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.(1998). Lost in translation: Non-sexist language. In DeborahCameron (Ed.), The feminist critique of language ((2nd ed., pp. 155–163). New York: Routledge.1993). Men, women and aggression. New York: Basic Books.(1973, February). The rhetoric of women's liberation: An oxymoron. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 74–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383155(1989). Man cannot speak for her (Volumes 1 and 2). Westport, CT: Praeger.(1997). Critiques of contemporary rhetoric (, & (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.2006, August 7). Waterloo's “experiment.”The Des Moines Register, pp. 1A, 3A.([Page 275]1993, Spring). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication?Communication Quarterly, 41(2), 129–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369874, & (1987). Love in America: Gender and self-development. New York: Cambridge University Press.(1989). Love and the rise of capitalism. In Barbara J.Risman & PepperSchwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships (pp. 12–25). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.(2000). Caring and gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (1999). Thinking critically about research on sex and gender (, & (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.2002). “I can't do that!” But I “can actually see around corners”: American Indian students and the study of public “communication.” In Judith N.Martin, Thomas K.Nakayama, & Lisa N.Flores (Eds.), Readings in intercultural communication: Experiences and contexts (pp. 138–149). Boston: McGraw-Hill.(2005). Sexuality now. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.(Catherine of Sienna. (1980). The dialogue ( , Trans.). New York: Paulist Press. (Original work published ca. 1378)Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005a, May 3). Births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: Provisional data for November 2004. National Vital Statistics Reports, 53(19).Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005b, October 24). Sexual violence: Fact sheet. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Retrieved October 29, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/svfacts.htm1999). Introduction. In MaryChapman & GlennHendler (Eds.), Sentimental men: Masculinity and the politics of affect in American culture (pp. 1–18). Berkeley: University of California Press., & (2004). A stone of hope: Prophetic religion and the death of Jim Crow. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5149/uncp/9780807828199(2003). Y are men the weaker sex?Endocrine Abstracts, 6. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0006/ea0006s4.htm(2005). Progress of the world's women 2005: Women, work and poverty. New York: United Nations Development Fund for Women., , , & (2004, August 13). To the ‘experts in humanity’: since when did women become the problem? [Electronic version]. National Catholic Reporter, 40(36), 7.. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2002). Moral judgement and conflict handling styles among Chinese in Hong Kong and PRC. The Journal of Management Development, 21(9), 666–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02621710210441667, & (2003, Summer). Bullying: The consequences of interparental discord and child's self-concept. Family Process, 42(2), 237–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.42204.x(2004, November). Veils, poems, guns, and martyrs: Four themes of Muslim women's experiences in Shirin Neshat's photographic work. Thirdspace, 4(1). Retrieved July 14, 2006, from http://www.iiav.nl/ezines/web/Thirdspace/2004/N01/thirdspace/4_1_Cichocki.htm(1981). Castration or decapitation?Signs, 7, 41–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/493857(1991). “Coming to writing” and other essays (DeborahJenson, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.([Page 276]2006, February 9). Work vs. family, complicated by race. The New York Times, p. G1.(1998, Fall). The rhetoric of “family values”: Scapegoating, utopia, and the privatization of social responsibility. Western Journal of Communication, 62(4), 387–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319809374617(2004). “To veil the threat of terror”: Afghan women and the “clash of civilizations” in the imagery of the U.S. war on terrorism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90(3), 285–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0033563042000270726(1996). Women talk: Conversations between women friends. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.(1997). One-at-a-time: The organization of men's talk. In SallyJohnson & Ulrike HannaMeinhof (Eds.), Language and masculinity (pp. 107–129). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.(2003). Men talk: Stories in the making of masculinities. Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470755617(1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(1997). The story of my body. In MaryCrawford & RhodaUnger (Eds.), In our own words: Readings on the psychology of women and gender (pp. 47–54). New York: McGraw-Hill.(1986). Learning from the outsider within. Social Problems, 33, 514–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800672(1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.(1994). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In DonnaBassin, MargaretHoney, & Maryle MahrerKaplan (Eds.), Representations of motherhood (pp. 56–74). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.(1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.(1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3096813(The compact edition of the Oxford English dictionary. (1971). Glasgow, Scotland: Oxford University Press.2001). Grrrl zine networks: Re-composing spaces of authority, gender, and culture. JAC, 21(2), 383–409.(1989, June). The rhetorical limits of polysemy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6(2), 103–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295038909366739(1990). Decoding abortion rhetoric: Communicating social change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.(1992). Post-Burke: Transcending the sub-stance of dramatism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78, 349–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639209384002(1998). Gender diversity: A theory of communication for the postmodern era. In Judith S.Trent (Ed.), Communication: Views from the helm for the 21st century (pp. 177–183). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.(1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2000). The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2005). Masculinities ((2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.2005, December). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639, & ([Page 277]1992, February). Review essay: Ethnography, rhetoric, and performance. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78, 80–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639209383982(1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.(1997). The way we really are: Coming to terms with America's changing family. New York: Basic Books.(2006). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy, or how love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin.(1999, March). The relevancy and gender identity in spectators’ interpretations of Thelma and Louise. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 16(1), 20–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039909367070(2000, Fall). “Chick flicks” as feminist texts: The appropriation of the male gaze in Thelma & Louise. Women's Studies in Communication, 23(3), 277–306.(2001). From motherless children to rhinestone cowgirls: At the crossroads of feminism and country music. Bitch, 14, 60–65.(1995). Talking difference: On gender and language. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250594(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.(2002). Downsizing democracy: How America sidelined its citizens and privatized its public. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press., & (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1996). Rape on trial: How the mass media construct legal reform and social change. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.(1998). The masculine ideal: Rape on prime-time television, 1976–1978. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 15, 423–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039809367058(1996, Fall). War is not just an event: Reflections on the significance of everyday violence. Hypatia, 11(4), 30–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01033.x(2000, Spring). Women, work, and gender relations in developing countries: A global perspective (review). Signs, 25(3), 960–966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/495502(1990). Testosterone, social class, and antisocial behavior in a sample of 4,462 men. Psychological Science, 1, 209–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00200.x, & (1987). Websters’ first new intergalactic wickedary of the English language. Boston: Beacon Press.(1987). Invisible work. Social Problems, 34(5), 403–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800538(1998, April 1). Reduced ratio of male to female births in several industrial countries. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(13), 1018–1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.13.1018, , & (2001). Transgressing the masculine: African American boys and the failure of schools. In WayneMartino & BobMeyenn (Eds.), What about the boys? Issues of masculinity in schools. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.(1987). La Respuesta. In A woman of genius ( , Trans.). Salisbury, CT: Lime Rick Press. (Original work published 1701)(1984). Alice doesn't: Feminism, semiotics, cinema. London: MacMillan.(1991). The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse and Society, 2(4), 413–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002004003(1997). Gender, power, and practice: Or putting your politics where your mouth is. In RuthWodak (Ed.), Gender, discourse, and ideology (pp. 37–56). London: Sage.([Page 278]2000). Self in community: African American women's views of self-esteem. The Howard Journal of Communications, 11(2), 73–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/106461700246634, & . (1995). A feminist critique of self-help books on heterosexual romance: Read ‘em and weep. Women's Studies in Communication, 18(2), 217–227., & (1999). Unruly arguments: The body rhetoric of Earth First!, ACT UP, and Queer Nation. Argumentation & Advocacy, 36, 9–21.(2000). Bodies of inscription: A cultural history of the modern tattoo community. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.(2000, Spring). The Guerrilla Girls’ comic politics of subversion. Women's Studies in Communication, 23(2), 133–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2000.10162566(2004). Strategies men use to resist. In Michael S.Kimmel & Michael A.Messner (Eds.), Men's lives ((6th ed., pp. 469–475). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.2004). Men's relationships with their fathers: Comparing men who batter with non-violent men. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 4, 61–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J135v04n01_04(Dicker, Roy, & Piepmeier, Alison. (Eds.). (2003). Catching a wave: Reclaiming feminism for the 21st century. Boston: Northeastern University Press.2004, September). Fallen: O.J. Simpson, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the re-centering of white patriarchy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(3), 271–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000244970, & (1998). Reshaping fatherhood: The social construction of shared parenting. San Francisco: Sage.(2006). Men are from North Dakota, women are from South Dakota. In KathrynDindia & Daniel J.Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication ((2nd ed., pp. 3–20). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2002). White men aren't. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.(2004). Mothers and fathers parenting together. In Anita L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 269–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., & (2005, March). Do women candidates play to gender stereotypes? Do men candidates play to women? Candidate sex and issues priorities on campaign websites. Political Research Quarterly, 58(1), 31–44.(2006, Winter). Tokyo's Dr. Phil. Religion in the News, pp. 20–21.(1980, August 30). Soft-porn culture. The New Republic, pp. 25–29.(1995, Spring). Feminism, difference(s), and rhetorical studies. Communication Studies, 46, 106–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979509368442(1996). Prime-time feminism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.(2001, June). Ellen, television, and the politics of gay and lesbian visibility. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18(2), 123–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180128077(2003). Feminism, Miss America, and media mythology. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 6, 127–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rap.2003.0028(2005, September). The state of the art in feminist scholarship in communication. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 448–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02681.x, & (1993). “Feminine style” and political judgment in the rhetoric of Ann Richards. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79, 286–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639309384036, & (2000). Redefining fatherhood. New York: New York University Press.(2006). Introduction: New feminist theories of visual culture. Signs, 31(3), 607–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499288, & ([Page 279]2000). “Husband and wife do it together”: Sex/gender allocation of labor among the Qhawqhat Lahu of Langcang, Southwest China. American Anthropologist, 10(3), 520–537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2000.102.3.520(2003). Trembling Before G-d [Documentary]. Israel: Simcha Leib Productions and Turbulent Arts, presented in Association with Keshet Broadcasting Ltd.(Director/Producer). (2005, February). Reproducing labor inequalities: Challenges for feminists conceptualizing care at the intersections of gender, race, and class. Gender & Society, 19(1), 66–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243204269499(1999, Summer). Girls, media, and the negotiation of sexuality: A study of race, class, and gender in adolescent peer groups. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(2), 193–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769909907600202(1993). I want a twenty-four-hour truce during which there is no rape. In EmilieEucwald, Pamela R.Fletcher, & MarthaRoth (Eds.), Transforming a rape culture (pp. 11–22). Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.(1988). Pornography & civil rights: A new day for women's equality. Minneapolis: Organizing Against Pornography., & (1978). Sex differences in human communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., & . (1988). Sex differences in nonverbal communication. In Larry A.Samovar & RichardPorter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 292–309). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., & . (2003). Language and gender in adolescence. In JanetHolmes & MiriamMeyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 381–400). Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147(1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333, & . (1999). New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28, 185–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599002031, & . (2004, April). You need to understand my gender role: An empirical test of Tannen's model of gender and communication. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 50(7–8), 491–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023069.93583.8b, & (1990). Are you the middle-class? In Margaret L.Andersen & Patricia HillCollins (Eds.), Race, class and gender: An anthology (pp. 100–109). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.(2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York: Holt.(2003, Summer). The interplay between ethnicity, religion, and gender among second-generation Christian and Muslim Arabs in Montreal. Canadian Ethnic Studies Journal, 35(2), 30–62.(1998). Girl-talk/boy-talk: Sex differences in adolescent speech. In JenniferCoates (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (pp. 42–54). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.(1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall., & (2000). Native tongue. New York: The Feminist Press at City University of New York. (Original work published 1984)([Page 280]2002). The Judas rose: Native tongue II. New York: The Feminist Press at City University of New York. (Original work published 1987)(2002). Earthsong: Native tongue III. New York: The Feminist Press at City University of New York. (Original work published 1993)(1999). Veil: Modesty, privacy, and resistance. New York: Berg. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/9781847888969(2005a). Confronting hegemony, resisting occupation. In Faye V.Harrison (Ed.), Resisting racism and xenophobia: Global perspectives on race, gender and human rights (pp. 251–268). New York: AltaMira Press.(2005b, June). Gendered resistance, feminist veiling, Islamic feminism [Electronic version]. Ahfad Journal, 22(1), 53–78.(1992, August 3). Difference seen in brains of gay men. USA Today, p. 8D.(2000). Geographies of gender and politics: The place of difference in Polynesian nationalism. Cultural Anthropology, 15(2), 171–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/can.2000.15.2.171(1989). Bananas, beaches, and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkley: University of California Press.(2000). The vagina monologues: V-Day edition. New York: Villard.(2000). The black image in the white mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., & (1992). Development. In WolfgangSachs (Ed.), The development dictionary (pp. 6–25). New York: Zed Books.(2000, February). No sissy boys here: A content analysis of the representation of masculinity in elementary school reading textbooks. Sex Roles, 42(3–4), 255–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007043323906, & (1992). The verbally abusive relationship: How to recognize it and how to respond. Holbrook, MA: Bob Adams.(2005). Gender, media, and politics: A critical review essay. Political Communication, 22, 387–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006663(1993). Motherhood as political voice: The rhetoric of the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo. Communication Studies, 44, 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979309368379(2005, September 22). Men in land of samurai find their feminine side: Marketing fosters shift in gender roles. Washington Post, p. A01.(2005, December 28). How women and men use the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/171/report_display.asp(1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Doubleday.(1999, October 14). Scenes from the betrayal of the American man. Speech delivered to the Commonwealth Club of California. Retrieved May 19, 2006, from http://gos.sbc.edu/f/faludi.html(Family Violence Prevention Fund. (2006). Domestic violence is a serious, widespread social problem in America: The facts. Retrieved April 7, 2006, from http://www.endabuse.org/resources/facts/1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men ((2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.2005). The bare bones of sex: Part 1—sex and gender. Signs, 30, 1491–1527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/424932(1989). Beyond feminist aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2006). “Because it is beautiful”: New feminist perspectives on beauty. Feminist Theory, 7(2), 273–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464700106064424([Page 281]Feminist Majority Foundation. (2001–2005). The Taliban & Afghan women: Background. Retrieved July 20, 2002, from http://www.feminist.org/afghan/facts.html2002). Doing gender: Doing difference. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.(2000, September). Moral development during adolescence: A cross-cultural study. (South Africa). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61(3-B), 1670.(1993). Sex differences in emotionality: Fact or stereotype?Feminism & Psychology, 3, 303–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353593033002(2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice., , & (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800492(1987). Television culture. New York: Methuen.(2000). Gender, sadness, and depression: The development of emotional focus through gendered discourse. In Agneta H.Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 232–253). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628191.012, & (Flanagan, Mary, & Booth, Austin. (Eds.). (2002). Reload: Rethinking women & cyberculture. Cambridge: MIT Press.1996, May). Creating discursive space through a rhetoric of difference: Chicana feminists craft a homeland. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 82, 142–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639609384147(2003). Human affection exchange: II. Affectionate communication in father-son relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(5), 599–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598466, & (Floyd, Kory, & Morman, Mark T. (Eds.). (2006). Widening the family circle: New research on family communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/97814522043691997). Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writing. Academy of Management Review, 22, 257–282.(1989). Challenging gender symbols. In Claudia BrushKidwell & ValerieSteele (Eds.), Men and women: Dressing the part (pp. 144–157). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.(1994, November). The construction of feminine spectatorship in Garrison Keillor's radio monologues. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80(4), 410–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639409384085, & (1995, March). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62, 2–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345, & (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language ( , Trans.). New York: Pantheon.(1980). Power/knowledge ( , , , & , Trans.). New York: Pantheon.(2001). Women, science, and academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender & Society, 15, 654–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124301015005002(2005). Reassessing gender and achievement: Questioning contemporary key debates. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203412923, & (1997). The psychology of gender differences in religion: A review of empirical research. Religion, 27, 81–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/reli.1996.0066(1997, April). What's wrong with sexual harassment?Stanford Law Review, 49, 691–772. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1229336([Page 282]1994, Fall). Introduction: Prolegomenon to future feminist philosophies of religions. Hypatia, 9(4), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00646.x(1751). Observations concerning the increase of mankind, peopling of countries, etc. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://www.historycarper.com/resources/twobf2/increase.htm(1992). Rethinking the public sphere. In CraigCalhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge: MIT Press.(1994, Winter). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs, 19(2), 309–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494886, & (2005). Gender bias in the classroom: Current controversies and implications for teachers. Childhood Education, 81(4), 221–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2005.10522277(2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men's and women's magazines?Body Image, 2, 81–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.12.002, , & (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.52, & (2001). Leadership and power: New conceptions. In Sue J. M.Freeman, Susan C.Bourque, & Christine M.Shelton (Eds.), Women on power: Leadership redefined (pp. 3–24). Boston: Northeastern University Press., & (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.(1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Dell.(1991, November). Nonverbal display of emotion in public and private: Self-monitoring, personality, and expressive cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 766–775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2066, & (2004). Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5(1), 40–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.127.116.11, & (2005, March). The construction of beauty: A cross-cultural analysis of women's magazine advertising. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 56–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02658.x, , & (2002). Young masculinities: Understanding boys in contemporary societyHampshire, England: Palgrave., , & (2004). All I really need to know I learned in kindergarten ((15th ed.). New York: Ballantine Books.2006, March 2). Wolves in sheep's clothing: A content analysis of children's television. Parents Television Council. Retrieved August 24, 2006, from http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/childrensstudy/childrensstudy.pdf(1975). The cycles of sex. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.(1990). Politics without brackets on religious convictions: Michael Perry and Bruce Ackerman on neutrality. Tulane Law Review, 64, 1143–1194.(1980). Women, church, and state (Sally RoeschWagner, Ed.). Watertown, MA: Persephone Press. (Original work published 1893)(2006). Gender and family interaction: Dress rehearsal for an improvisation? In Bonnie J.Dow & Julia T.Wood (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and communication (pp. 41–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976053(Gamman, Lorraine, & Marshment, Margaret. (Eds.). (1989). The female gaze: Women as viewers of popular culture. Seattle, WA: The Real Comet Press.1999). Popular culture and high culture: An analysis and evaluation of taste (([Page 283]Rev. ed.). New York: Basic Books.1998). Communicating effectively with the Chinese. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (2002). Media, gender and identity. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203360798(1979). The womanization of rhetoric. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 2, 195–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685%2879%2991809-8(1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2004). Coming to terms: Masculinity and physical disability. In Michael S.Kimmel & Michael A.Messner (Eds.), Men's lives (, & (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.2004, August). Understanding work and family through a gendered lens. Community, Work and Family7(2), 163–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1366880042000245452(Gibbons, Sheila. (Ed.). (2005, December). Industry statistics. Media Report to Women. Retrieved April 21, 2006, from http://www.mediareporttowomen.com/statistics.htm2004). Denormatizing queer theory: More than (simply) lesbian and gay studies. Feminist Theory, 5(1), 73–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464700104040814(1983). Theories of nonverbal behavior: A critical review of proxemics research. In RandallCollins (Ed.), Sociological theory (pp. 120–154). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., & (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1995). Sports sex: A theory of sexual aggression. In HelenSterk & LynnTurner (Eds.), Difference that makes a difference: Examining research assumptions in gender issues. Westport, CT: Greenwood.(1990). Sport Sex [documentary]. Meadville, PA.(Writer), & (Producer). (1955). On facework: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213–231.(1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.(1979). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.(2005, June 27). Test reveals gender early in pregnancy: Ethicists fear use in sex selection. The Boston Globe, p. Al.(1990). The feminization of poverty: Only in America?Westport, CT: Praeger., & (1991). Commodity feminism. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8(3), 333–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039109366801, , & (1999). You just don't have the evidence: An analysis of claims and evidence in Deborah Tannen's You just don't understand. In Michael E.Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 22, pp. 1–49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (2001). Engendering power in Native North America. In DanaVannoy (Ed.), Gender mosaics (pp. 43–52). Los Angeles: Roxbury., & (2000). Writing the new ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.(Bud). (2001). Gender representation in notable children's picture books: 1995–1999. Sex Roles, 45, 89–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013064418674, & (1999). Constructing opposition within girls’ games. In MaryBucholtz, A. C.Liang, & Laurel A.Sutton (Eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse (pp. 388–410). New York: Oxford University Press.([Page 284]1997). Sex, speech, and stereotypes: Why women use prestige speech forms more than men. Language and Society, 26, 47–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019400(2001). “Any desired length”: Negotiating gender through sports clothing, 1870–1925. In PhilipScranton (Ed.), Beauty and business: Commerce, gender, and culture in modern America. New York: Routledge.(1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.(1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York: Random House., & (2006). Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the United States: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(4), 622–640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.622, & (2000). Gender, power, and violence: Assessing the family stereotypes of the children of batterers. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 600–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-318.104.22.1680, & (1993). Letters from prison. New York: Columbia University Press., , & (1995). Black masculinity and visual culture. Callaloo, 18(2), 401–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cal.1995.0055(1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationship. New York: HarperCollins.(1999, Summer). Defining male and female: Intersexuality and the collision between law and biology. Arizona Law Review, 41, 265–328.(1996, July 5). The VMI decision: Shattering sexual stereotypes. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 42(43), A52., & (2005, March). Predicting exposure to and liking of media violence: A uses and gratifications approach. Communication Studies, 56(1), 71–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0008957042000332250, & (1993). Politics of identity/politics of location: Women workers organizing in a postmodern world. Women's Studies in Communication, 16(1), 1–33.(2003). Legislating a “normal, classic family”: The rhetorical construction of families in American welfare policy. Political Communication, 20, 473–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244202(2003). Boys and girls together: Improving gender relationships in K-6 classrooms. Greenfield, MA: Northeast Foundation for Children.(1988). Cultural and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (Guerrilla Girls. (1995). Confessions of the Guerrilla Girls. New York: HarperPerennial.1997). Arrogant perception, world traveling, and multicultural feminism: The case of female genital surgeries. In Adrien KatherineWing(Ed.), Critical race feminism: A reader (pp. 352–360). New York: New York University Press.(2005). The mind of boys: Saving our sons from falling behind in school and life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., & (2005, February 11). Navigating the new subtleties of sex-discrimination cases in academe. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(23), B20.(2003). Changing gender norms: Transitional dilemmas. In FromaWalsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (, , & (3rd ed., pp. 301–336). New York: Guilford Press.Hadewijch. (1980). The complete works ( , Trans.). New York: Paulist Press. (Original work published ca. mid-1200s).1987). Gender, nonverbal behavior, and perceived dominance: A test of the theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 257–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1247, & ([Page 285]1998). Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.(2005). In a queer time & place. New York: New York University Press.(Hall, Donald E. (Ed.). (1994). Muscular Christianity: Embodying the Victorian age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO97805116593311984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.(2006). How big are nonverbal sex differences? The case of smiling and nonverbal sensitivity. In KathrynDindia & Daniel J.Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication ((2nd ed., pp. 59–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2000). Gender differences in nonverbal communication of emotion. In Agneta H.Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 97–117). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628191.006, , & (1997). Subordination and nonverbal sensitivity: A study and synthesis of findings based on trait measures. Sex Roles, 37, 295–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025608105284, , & (1995). Lip service on the fantasy lines. In KiraHall & MaryBucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 183–216). New York: Routledge.(2000). Performativity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 184–187.(1989). Ideology and communication theory. In BrendaDervin, LarryGrossberg, BarbaraO'Keefe, & EllenWartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication theory (Vol. 1, pp. 40–52). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1996). Feminist assessment of emancipatory potential and Madonna's contradictory gender practices. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 82, 125–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639609384146(2004). The politics of disgust: The public identity of the welfare queen. New York: New York University Press.(2000). Badgering or bantering? Gender differences in experience of, and reactions to, sexual harassment among U.S. high school students. Gender & Society, 14, 718–746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124300014006002, & (1998, May). Theorizing masculinity with/in the media. Communication Theory, 8(2), 183–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00217.x(1995). Subjectivity, experience, and knowledge: An epistemology from/for Rainbow Coalition politics. In JudithRoof & RobynWeigman (Eds.), Who can speak? Authority and critical identity (pp. 120–136). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.(1998). Can feminism be multicultural?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(Harding, Sandra, & Hintikka, Merrill. (Eds.). (2003). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, methodology, and the philosophy of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. (Original work published 1983)1986). Data source marking in the Jaqi languages. In WallaceChafe & JohannaNichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 113–136). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.(1999, Spring). Why we should say “women and men” until it doesn't matter any more. Women and Language, 22(1), 1–2.(2000). Gender/language subtexts as found in literature anthologies: Mixed messages, stereotypes, silences, erasure. In M. J.Hardman & AnitaTaylor (Eds.), Hearing many voices (pp. 75–85). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.(1997). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. In Adrien KatherineWing (Ed.), Critical race feminism: A reader (pp. 11–26). New York: New York University Press.([Page 286]2003, December 7). If shoe won't fit, fix the foot? Popular surgery raises concern. New York Times, pp. A1, A36.(2004, May). Masculinity(s), the agrarian frontier myth, and cooperative ways of organizing: Contradictions and tensions in the experience and enactment of democracy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 89–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000210016(2005, December). Becoming entrepreneurs: Intersections of race, class, and gender at the Black beauty salon. Gender & Society, 19(6), 789–808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243205280104(1910, June). New York State Association opposed to woman suffrage. The Chautauquan, pp. 84–89.(1993). Emotive subjects: Organizational men, organizational masculinities and the (de)construction of “emotions.” In StephenFineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (pp. 142–166). London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219850(1994). The organization(s) of violence: Men, gender relations, organizations, and violences. Human Relations, 47, 731–754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700608(1998). License or obligation to smile: The effect of power and sex on amount and type of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1332–1342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412007, & (1995). Recipes for change: Weekly help for Indian women. Women's Studies in Communication, 18(2), 177–188.(1807). The phenomenology of mind ( , Trans.). Germany: Wurtzburg & Bamberg.(Held, David, & McGrew, Anthony (Eds.). (2000). The global transformation reader. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 412–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412(2004). To nod or not to nod: An observational study of nonverbal communication and status in female and male college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 358–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00152.x, , , & (2002, March). Examining the effects of hegemonic depictions of female bodies on television: A call for theory and programmatic research. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(1), 106–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180216550(1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.(1995). Body politics revisited: What do we know today? In Pamela J.Kalbfleisch & Michael J.Cody (Eds.), Gender, power and communication in human relationships (pp. 27–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.(1991). Gender, power, and miscommunication. In NikolasCoupland, HowardGiles, & John M.Wiemann (Eds.), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk (pp. 18–43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (1995). Subjects, knowledges, … and all the rest: Speaking for what. In JudithRoof & RobynWeigman (Eds.), Who can speak? Authority and critical identity (pp. 137–150). Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.(2004). Lara's lethal and loaded mission: Transposing reproduction and destruction. In Sherrie A.Inness (Ed.), Action chicks: New images of tough women in popular culture (pp. 21–46). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.(2004). Women and children last: The discursive construction of weblogs. In LauraGurak, SmiljanaAntonijevic, LaurieJohnson, ClancyRatliff, & JessicaReyman (Eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. Retrieved August 13, 2004, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/women_and_children.html, , , & ([Page 287]2004). Documenting violations: Rhetorical witnessing and the spectacle of distant suffering. Biography, 27(1), 104–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/bio.2004.0034(2005, March). Off-ramps and on-ramps: Keeping talented women on the road to success. Harvard Business Review, pp. 43–54., & (Hildegard of Bingen. (1990). Scivias ( & , Trans.). New York: Paulist Press. (Original work published ca. 1151/1152).2002). Teaching and doing gender in African American families. Sex Roles, 47(11/12), 493–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022026303937, (1999). Rebaking the pie: The woman as dessert metaphor. In MaryBucholtz, A. C.Liang, & Laurel A.Sutton (Eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse (pp. 145–162). New York: Oxford University Press.(2004). Androgen, estrogen, and gender: Contributions of the early hormone environment to gender-related behavior. In Alice H.Eagly, Anne E.Beall, & Robert J.Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender ((2nd ed., pp. 9–37). New York: Guilford Press.1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feelings. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Henry Holt.(2003). The second shift ((2nd ed.). New York: Avon Books.Hofstede, Geert. (Ed.) (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1990). Educated in romance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., & (1978). Seeing through clothing. New York: Viking Press.(1995). Women, men, and politeness. London: Longman.(1997). Story-telling in New Zealand women's and men's talk. In RuthWodak (Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 263–293). London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250204(1997, October). “I'm here but I'm there”: The meanings of Latina transitional motherhood [Electronic version]. Gender & Society, 11(5), 548–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124397011005003, & (hooks, bell. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.hooks, bell. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End Press.hooks, bell. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Boston: South End Press.hooks, bell. (1993). Sisters of the yam: Black women and self-recovery. Boston: South End.hooks, bell. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.hooks, bell. (1995). Appearance obsession: Is the price too high. Essence, 26, 69–71.1995, May). The performance turn—and toss. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81, 228–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384110(2003). Gendering talk. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.(1972). Dialectic of enlightenment ( , Trans.). New York: Herder and Herder., & (1998). Transforming appearance into rhetorical argument: Rhetorical criticism of public speeches of Barbara Jordan, Lucy Parsons, and Angela Y. Davis. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.(Women anarchists and the feminine ideal: Voltairine de Cleyre, Emma Goldman, and Lucy Parsons. In Martha SolomanWatson (Ed.), The rhetoric of nineteenth century reform. Dearborn: Michigan State University Press., , & (In press). [Page 288]2000). Multiple perspectives: African American women conceive their talk. Women and Language, 23(1), 11–17.(2004). When Black women talk with White women: Why the dialogues are difficult. In AlbertoGonzalez, MarshaHouston, & VictoriaChen (Eds.), Our voices: Essays in culture, ethnicity, and communication ((4th ed., pp. 119–125). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Hunt, Lynn. (Ed.). (1993). The invention of pornography. New York: Zone Books.2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581(1995). Magnitude of psychological gender differences: Another side to the story. American Psychologist, 50, 159–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.159, & (Ingoldsby, Bron B., & Smith, Suzanna. (Eds.). (2006). Families in multicultural perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.1999). White weddings: Romancing heterosexuality in popular culture. New York: Routledge.(Inness, Sherrie A. (Ed.). (2004). Action chicks: New images of tough women in popular culture. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403981240International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. (2004). World perspectives on child abuse (6th ed.). Chicago: ISPCAN. Retrieved July 6, 2006, from http://www.ispcan.org/documents/ISPCANWorldPerspectives2004.pdfThe International Stepfamily Foundation. (2006, October). Retrieved October 1, 2006, from http://www.istepfamily.com1985a). Speculum of the other woman ( , Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(1985b). This sex which is not one ( , Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(1998). The shaping of activist recruitment and participation: A study of women in the Mississippi civil rights movement. Gender & Society, 12(6), 692–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124398012006006(2004). GenderSpeak: Personal effectiveness in gender communication (, & (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.1994). The Home, Heaven, and Mother Party: Female anti-suffragists in the United States, 1868–1920. Brooklyn, NY: Carlson.(2002). Female opposition: The anti-suffrage campaign. In Jean H.Baker (Ed.), Votes for women: The struggle for suffrage revisited (pp. 118–129). New York: Oxford University Press.(2003). Broadening constructions of family violence: Mothers’ perspectives of aggression from their children. Child and Family Social Work, 8, 321–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2003.00298.x(2003). Defining Black masculinity as cultural property: Toward an identity negotiation paradigm. In Larry A.Samovar & Richard E.Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 120–130). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., & (1988). Eloquence in an electronic age: The transformation of political speechmaking. New York: Oxford University Press.(1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.(Japan's feminine falsetto falls right out of favor. (1995, December 13). New York Times, pp. A1, A4.1995). DreamWorlds II [Videotape]. (Available from Media Education Foundation, 26 Center Street, Northampton, MA 01060).(Producer/Writer/Editor). ([Page 289]1996). Friendship among women: Closeness in dialogue. In Julia T.Wood (Ed.), Gendered relationships: A reader (pp. 79–94). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.(2000). Speaking culturally: Language diversity in the United States. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452220406(2000). Listening styles: Biological or psychological differences. International Journal of Listening, 14, 32–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2000.10499034, , , & (2002, April 5). Linguistic profiling. The Black Commentator, 1. Retrieved July 21, 2005, from http://www.blackcommentator.com/linguistic_profiling_pr.html(1990). The Lady, the Whore, and the Spinster: The rhetorical use of Victorian images of women. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54(1), 82–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319009374326(Journal of Marriage and the Family. (2001). Inside cover. 63(1).Julian of Norwich. (1978). Showings ( & , Trans.). New York: Paulist Press. (Original work published ca. 1393).Kachru, Braj B. (Ed.). (1982). The other tongue: English across cultures. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.2006). “No way my boys are going to be like that!” Parents’ responses to children's gender nonconformity. Gender & Society, 20(2), 149–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243205284276(1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.(1983). Is the gaze male? In AnnSnitow, ChristineStansell, & SharonThompson (Eds.), Powers of desire: The politics of sexuality (pp. 309–327). New York: Monthly Review Press.(1999). Tough guise: Violence, media and the crisis of masculinity [Videotape]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.(2003). Wrestling with manhood: Boys, bullying and battering [Videotape]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.(1997). “Opening” faces: The politics of cosmetic surgery and Asian American women. In MaryCrawford & RhodaUnger (Eds.), In our own words: Readings on the psychology of women and gender (pp. 55–73). New York: McGraw-Hill.(1974). Norm-makers and norm-breakers: Uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. In RichardBauman & JoelSherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 125–143). New York: Cambridge University Press.(1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376270(2005). From lingua franca to global English. Global Envision [Website]. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http://www.globalenvision.org/library/8/655/(2002). Nigger: The strange career of a troublesome word. New York: Pantheon Books.(2005, March 18). We must make the academic workplace more humane and equitable. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B6–B9.(2001). A feminist perspective: Why feminists should give the reasonable woman standard another chance. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 10, 195–230.(2005). Homosocial desire in men's talk: Balancing and re-creating cultural discourses of masculinity. Language in Society, 34(5), 695–726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050268(1999). Reflexive communication in the culturally diverse workplace. Westport, CT: Praeger., & (1994). Toward a new model for the prevention of eating disorders. In PatriciaFallonz, Melanie A.Katzman, & Susan C.Wooley (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in eating disorders. New York: Guilford Press.([Page 290]2000). Killing us softly 3 [Videotape]. (Available from Media Education Foundation, 26 Center Street, Northampton, MA 01060)(Creator), & (Director, Editor, Producer). (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.(2003). Masculinity as homophobia. In EstelleDisch (Ed.), Reconstructing gender: A multicultural anthology ((3rd ed., pp. 103–109). Boston: McGraw-Hill.2004). The gendered society ((2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.1857). Two years ago. Cambridge, England: Macmillan.(1999). Exploring the impact of gender role self-perception on communication style. Women's Studies in Communication, 22(2), 190–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1999.10162420, & (Fall,1991). Street harassment: The language of sexual terrorism. Discourse and Society, 2(4), 451–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002004006(2002). Uprooting racism: How White people can work for racial justice ((Rev. ed.). Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.2003, November). Confronting the gap: Why religion needs to be given more attention in women's studies. Thirdspace: A Journal for Emerging Feminist Scholars, 3(1). Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.thirdspace.ca/articles/klassen.htm(1998). The myth that schools shortchange girls: Social science in the service of deception. Washington, DC: The Women's Freedom Network. Retrieved October 2006 from http://www.uaf.edu/northern/schools/download.html(2007). Intercultural communication encounters. Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon., & (2002). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (, & (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.1990). Force fields in Black and White. In DonaldCarbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication in intercultural contact (pp. 193–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.(1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In Eleanor E.Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(1996). The public advocacy of Emma Goldman: An anarcho-feminist stance on human rights. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.(2000). One cause, two paths: Militant vs. adjustive strategies in the British and American women's suffrage movements. Communication Quarterly, 48, 240–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370009385595(2001, September 28). Patriotic purchasing. Americans are being urged to spend, but analysts doubt the strategy will have an impact in the long run. The Boston Globe, p. C1.(1965). The ideas of the woman suffrage movement, 1890–1920. New York: W. W. Norton.(1981). Women and men speaking: Frameworks for analysis. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.(1992). Harassment and everyday life. In LanaRakow (Ed.), Women making meaning: New feminist directions in communication (pp. 100–120). New York: Routledge.(1992). Exploding knowledge. In CherisKramarae & DaleSpender (Eds.), The knowledge explosion: Generations of feminist scholarship (pp. 1–26). New York: Teachers College Press., & ([Page 291]1992). Amazons, bluestockings and crones: A feminist dictionary (, & (2nd ed.). London: Pandora Press.2005). The sociology of gender: A brief introduction ((2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Roxbury.1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art ( , , & , Trans.; Leon S.Roudiez, Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1977)(2006). Gender communication theories and analyses: From silence to performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (2000). Review of Women of faith in Victorian culture and Women's theology in nineteenth-century Britain. Victorian Studies, 43, 178–181.(2001). Preschool girls’ and boys’ verbal conflict strategies in the U.S. and China: Cross-cultural and contextual considerations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, Special Issue: Gender Construction in Children's Interactions: A Cultural Perspective, 4(1), 45–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3401_3, & (1998). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book 11. ((1st American ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.1999). Muscular Christianity: Evangelical Protestants and the development of American sport. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker., & (2002). Smile boycotts and other body politics. Feminism and Psychology, 12(3), 319–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353502012003003(2000). Gender and smiling: A meta-analysis. In Agenta H.Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 118–142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628191.007, & (2002). Moral politics ((2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.2003, September 1). Framing the Dems. The American Prospect. Retrieved September 2, 2006, from http://www.prospect.org/print/V14/8/lakoff-g.html(1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., & (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row.(2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251300021004004, & (1993). In the wake of the affluent society: An exploration of post-development. New York: Zed Books.(1993). If he hollers let him go: Regulating racist speech on campus. In Mari J.Matsuda et al. (Eds.), Words that wound (pp. 53–88). Boulder. CO: Westview Press.(2000a). Gender, affiliation, assertion and the interactive context of parent-child play. Developmental Psychology, 36, 381–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1991(2000b). The social construction and socialization of gender. In Patricia H.Miller & Ellin KofskyScholrick (Eds.), Towards a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 127–152). New York: Routledge.(1998). Moderators of gender effects on parents’ talk to their children. Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 3–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.52, , & (2004). Pure persuasion: A case study of Nüshu or “Women's Script” discourses. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90, 403–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0033563042000302162(1996). The culture of sexual harassment in secondary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 383–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002383, , , & ([Page 292]2005, May). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 328–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00119.x, & (1992). Status and privacy restoring communication in the workplace. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 4, 419–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889209365347, , & (2006). Perceptions of men and women departing from conversational sex-role stereotypes. In KathrynDindia & Daniel J.Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (, & (2nd ed., pp. 281–298). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2001). Contextual differences in parent-child play: Implications for children's gender role development. Sex Roles, 44(3/4), 155–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010950919451, & (1998). The nonverbal display and judgment of extraversion, masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: A lens model analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 80–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2189(1997). “It's a girl!” Bringing performativity back to linguistics. In AnnaLivia & KiraHall (Eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 3–20). New York: Oxford University Press., & (1995). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York: New Press.(2004, September 1). Gender wage gap widening, census data shows: First decline in women's real earnings since 1995. Retrieved March 1, 2006, from http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/censusandstatistics/a/paygapgrows.htm(2001). The influence of media on gender images. In DanaVannoy (Ed.), Gender mosaics (pp. 114–122). Los Angeles: Roxbury.(1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.(1984). Sister outsider. Trumansberg, NY: The Crossing Press.(2005). Men's violence toward women is the serious social problem. In Donileen R.Loseke, Richard J.Gelles, & Mary M.Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 79–95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (2003). Speaking to silence: Toward queering nonverbal communication. In Gust A.Yep, Karen E.Lovaas, & John P.Elia (Eds.), Queer theory and communication: From disciplining queers to queering the discipline(s) (pp. 87–107). Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.(2001). Disturbances in the social body: Differences in body image and eating problems among African American and White women. Gender & Society, 15, 239–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124301015002005(LSA Resolution on the Oakland “Ebonics” Issue. (1997, July 1). Approved by members attending the 71st Annual Business Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, January 3, 1997; adopted by LSA membership in a mail ballot, July 1, 1997. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://lsadc.org/info/lsa-res-ebonics.cfm1999). Dress, gender, and cultural change: Asian American and African American rites of passage. Oxford, UK: Berg. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/9781847888686(1973). The pill [Music lyrics]. Retrieved June 8, 2006, from http://www.musicsonglyrics.com/L/lorettalynnlyrics/lorettalynnthepilllyrics.htm(1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.267, & (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press., & ([Page 293]2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men's and women's provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles, 50(3–4), 143–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000015549.88984.8d, , , , & (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1993). Only words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2005). Women's lives, men's laws. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1997). In harm's way: The pornography civil rights hearings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., & (2000). Sex differences in anxiety and depression: Empirical evidence and methodological questions. In Agneta H.Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 277–298). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628191.014, , & (2001). The cool pose, how Black men present themselves as a spectacle of self-expression and agency, by adopting the cool pose. In Stephen M.Whitehead & Frank J.Barrett (Eds.), The masculinities reader (pp. 209–218). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.(1992). Cool pose: The dilemmas of Black manhood in America. New York: Lexington Books., & (Malamuth, Neil M., & Donnerstein, Edward (Eds.). (1984). Pornography and sexual aggression. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In John J.Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 196–216). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., & (1998). Feminism and democracy. In AnnePhillips (Ed.), Feminism & politics (pp. 142–158). New York: Oxford University Press.(1989, Spring). Moving over. Trivia: A Journal of Ideas, 14(Part II), 9–12.(2004). On the construction of gender, sex, and sexualities. In Alice H.Eagly, Anne E.Beall, & Robert J.Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (, , & (2nd ed., pp. 192–216). New York: Guilford Press.1991). The contradiction and the challenge of the educated woman. Women's Studies Quarterly (1–2), 8–27.(2004). Intercultural communication in contexts (, & (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17(3), 342–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243203017003002(2004, June). Gender as social institution. Social Forces, 82(4), 1249–1273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0081(1980a). Beyond the “he/man” approach: The case for nonsexist language. Signs, 5, 482–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/493733(1980b). The psychology of the generic masculine. In SallyMcConnell-Ginet, RuthBorker, & NellyFurman (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 69–78). New York: Praeger.(1983). Beyond the he/man approach: The case for nonsexist language. In BarrieThorne, CherisKramarae, & NancyHenley (Eds.), Language, gender, and society (pp. 25–37). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.([Page 294]2000). Gender and anthropology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press., & (Massachusetts Association Opposed to the Further Extension of Suffrage to Women. (1912, October). Opinions of eminent persons against woman suffrage [Pamphlet]. Boston: Author.2004). Breaking out of the pink-collar ghetto: Policy solutions for non-college women. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.(1993). Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim's story. In Mari J.Matsuda, Charles R.Lawrence, III, RichardDelgado, & Kimberlè WilliamsCrenshaw (Eds.), Words that wound (pp. 17–51). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.(Matsuda, Mari J., Lawrence, Charles R., III, Delgado, Richard, & Crenshaw, Kimberlè Williams. (Eds.). (1993). Words that wound. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.1992). The rise of public woman: Woman's power and woman's place in the United States, 1630–1970. New York: Oxford University Press.(2002). Appropriate[ing] dress: Women's rhetorical style in nineteenth-century America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.(1997, November). Silencing the feminine in managerial discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.(Mayer, Tamar. (Ed.). (2000). Gender ironies of nationalism: Sexing the nation. London: Routledge.2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/426800(1997). “No longer in a future heaven”: Women and nationalism in South Africa. In AnneMcClintock, AamirMufti, & EllaShohat (Eds.), Dangerous liaisons: Gender, nation, and postcolonial perspectives (pp. 89–112). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.(2000). A meta-analysis review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.424(1996). Women as men and people: Effects of gender-marked language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(10), 1004–1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672962210003, & (1994, May). Women as men and people: Occupation title suffixes as primes. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago., & (1992). “I don't smile much anymore”: Affect, gender, and the discourse of Pittsburgh police officers. In KiraHall & BirchMoonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the 1992 Berkeley Conference on Women and Language (pp. 386–403). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.(1998). “I don't smile much anymore”: Affect, gender and the discourse of Pittsburgh police officers.” In JenniferCoates (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (Vol. 2, pp. 309–327). Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.(McKay, Jim, Messner, Michael A., & Sabo, Donald F. (Eds.). (2000). Masculinities, gender, relations, and sports. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1988, August 8). Men vs. women. U.S. News and World Report, pp. 50–56., , , & (1993). Invisible Southern Black women leaders in the movement: The triple constraints of gender, race, and class. Gender & Society, 7(2), 162–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124393007002002(1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. (Charles W.Morris, Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.(1968). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: Dell. (Original work published 1935)([Page 295]1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.(1971/1973). Rape: An act of terror. In AnneKoedt, EllenLevine, & AnitaRapone (Eds.), Radical feminism (pp. 228–233). New York: Quadrangle., & (1994). Welcome to the jungle: New positions in Black cultural studies. London: Routledge.(1996). Managing to kill: Masculinities and the space shuttle Challenger explosion. In CliffCheng (Ed.), Masculinities in organizations (pp. 29–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2004). The gendered society ((2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.2006). Gendered communication in dating relationships. In Bonnie J.Dow & Julia T.Wood (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender in communication (pp. 25–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.(2004). Psychology ((7th ed.). New York: Worth.2004, June). African American women and violence: Gender, race, and class in the news. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21(2), 95–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180410001688029(1997). Gender differences in self-reported response in troubles talk. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 37(7–8), 527–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025606918913, & (1993). How rape is encouraged in American boys and what we can do to stop it. In EmilieBuchwald, Pamela R.Fletcher, & MarthaRoth (Eds.), Transforming a rape culture (pp. 153–164). Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.(Millenium Campaign. (2004). About the goals. Goal 3. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.millenniumcampaign.org/site/pp.asp?c=grKVL2NLE&b=1863821993). Foreword. In , Womanwords: A dictionary of words about women (pp. ix–xii). New York: Henry Holt., & (1993). Womanwords: A dictionary of words about women. New York: Henry Holt.(2002). Child and parent perceptions of hurtful messages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 731–754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407502196001, , & (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238(1995). The wages of motherhood: Inequality in the welfare state, 1917–1942. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(1998). Psychoanalysis and culture: Contemporary states of mind. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.(1966). A social learning view of sex differences in behavior. In Eleanor E.Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 93–106). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(1996). Ever after: Reading the women who read (and re-write) romances. Theatre Topics, 6(1), 51–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tt.1996.0005(2003). Ambiguous boundary between women's and men's speech in the Japanese language in the use of polite expressions. Studia Linguistica, 16, 105–126.(1984). Loving with a vengeance: Mass-produced fantasies for women. New York: Routledge.(1998). Old wives tales and other women's stories. New York: New York University Press.(2003). Feminism without borders. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.(1985). Sexual/textual politics: Feminist literary theory. London: Methuen.([Page 296]2006). Communication and gender among adult friends. In Bonnie J.Dow & Julia T.Wood (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender in communication (pp. 75–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2002). Color of rape: Gender and race in television's public spheres. New York: State University of New York Press.(1999). No woman no cry: Claiming African American women's place. In MaryBucholtz, A. C.Liang, & Laurel A.Sutton (Eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse (pp. 27–45). New York: Oxford University Press.(2006). The good son: Men's perceptions of the characteristics of sonhood. In KoryFloyd & Mark T.Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 37–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204369, & (Morrison, Toni. (Ed.). (1992). Race-ing justice, en-gendering power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas and the construction of social reality. New York: Pantheon Books.Moss, Peter, & Deven, Fred. (Eds.). (1999). Parental leave: Progress or pitfall?The Hague: Netherlands. Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.1997). Postmodernism, “realism,” and the politics of identity: Cherríe Moraga and Chicana feminism. In M. JacquiAlexander & Chandra TalpadeMohanty (Eds.), Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures (pp. 125–150). New York: Routledge.(1991). Sexual violence and coercion in close relationships. In KathleenMcKinney & SusanSpreecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 155–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., , , & (1998). The gender-linked language effect: Do language differences really make a difference? In Dan J.Canary & KatherineDindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 127–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.(1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 315–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376175, , , & (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6(2001). Power and politics. In Fredric M.Jablin & Linda L.Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 585–623). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(2003). “Our mission and our moment”: George W. Bush and September 11th. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 6(4), 607–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rap.2004.0013(2005). Biography. Patty Murray [Website]. Retrieved July 18, 2005, from http://www.pattymurray.com/biography.php(2002). Cunt: A declaration of independence. New York: Seal Press.(2005). Welfare warriors: The welfare rights movement in the United States. New York: Routledge.(2005). Head-hunting on the Internet: Identity tourism, avatars, and racial passing in textual and graphic chat spaces. In RaifordGuins & Omayra ZaragozaCruz (Eds.), Popular culture: A reader (pp. 520–533). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1999). Whiteness as a strategic rhetoric: In Thomas K.Nakayama & Judith N.Martin (Eds.), Whiteness: The communication of social identity (pp. 87–106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (1996). Hijras: An alternative sex and gender role in India. In GilbertHerdt (Ed.), Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history (pp. 373–415). New York: Zone Books.([Page 297]2000). Gender diversity: Crosscultural variations. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.(2003). Hinduism. In ArvindSharma & Katherine K.Young (Eds.), Her voice, her faith: Women speak on world religions (pp. 11–58). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.(National Association for Single Sex Public Education. (2006a). Advantages for girls. NASSPE website. Retrieved October 1, 2006, from http://www.singlesexschools.org/advantages-forgirls.htmNational Association for Single Sex Public Education. (2006b). Learning style differences, extracted from from Sax, Leonard, M.D., Ph.D. Why gender matters (2005). NASSPE website. Retrieved October 1, 2006, from http://www.singlesexschools.org/researchlearning.htmNational Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information. (2004). Child abuse and neglect fatalities: Statistics and interventions. Retrieved July 6, 2006, from http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/fatality.pdfNational Education Association Research. (2003). Status of the American public school teacher 2000–2001. Washington, DC: NEA.National Organization for Women. (2006). Violence against women in the United States. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.now.org/issues/violence/stats.html2000). Vanishing voices: The extinction of the world's languages. New York: Oxford University Press., & (1992). Pronominal disagreements: The stubborn problem of singular epicene antecedents. Language in Society, 21, 447–475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015529(1990). Androcentric coding of man and his in memory by language users. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 455–464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2890%2990069-X(1983). Linguistic options and choices for Black women in the rural South. In BarrieThorne, CherisKramarae, & NancyHenley (Eds.), Language, gender, and society (pp. 54–68). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.(1983). Communication style: Theory, applications, and measures. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(Oakland School Board approves Black English program and sparks national debate [Electronic version]. (1997, January 13). Jet, 91, 12.1981). Woman's work: The housewife, past and present. New York: Pantheon.(1998). Office ladies and salaried men: Power, gender, and work in Japanese companies. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2006). Visual perversions: Race, sex, and cinematic pleasure. Signs, 31(3), 641–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/498988(1995). “Tasteless” Japanese: Less “feminine” speech among young Japanese women. In KiraHall & MaryBucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 297–328). New York: Routledge.(2004, June 6). It beats working: Women fought hard for the right to be working mothers—but now many want to step off the career ladder and swap the boardroom for full-time motherhood. Is this the failure of one movement or the beginning of another?The Observer (London), p. 1.(Olian, JoAnne. (Ed.). (1995). Everyday fashions 1909–1920: As pictured in Sears catalogues. New York: Dover.2001). Why now? How male body image is closely tied to masculinity and changing gender roles. Society for the Psychological Study of Men and Masculinity Bulletin, 6(4), 11–12.([Page 298]1997). Eating disorders in men: Prevalence, recognition, and treatment. Directions in Psychiatry, 17, 41–51., & (2004). Biceps and body image: The relationship between muscularity and self-esteem and eating disorder symptoms. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5(2), 112–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1524-9184.108.40.206, , , & (2002, Winter). Exploring “common couple violence” in heterosexual romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 66(1), 104–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310209374727(2005). “It depends on what you mean by starting it”: An exploration of how women define initiation of aggression and their motives for behaving aggressively. Sex Roles, 53(7/8), 603–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7145-5, & (1998, February). From the standpoint(s) of traditionally muted groups: Explicating a co-cultural communication theoretical model. Communication Theory, 8(1), 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00209.x(2001). Interracial communication: Theory into practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., & (1994). School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.(1993). Public policy argument and survivor testimony: Pro-ordinance conservatives, confession, mediation, and recuperation. In Raymie E.McKerrow (Ed.), Argument and the postmodern challenge: Proceedings of the eighth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 461–467). Annandale, VA: SCA.(1995). Voltairine de Cleyre: Sexual pleasure and sexual slavery in the 19th century. National Women's Studies Association Journal, 7, 54–68.(1996). Bodies, borders and letters: Gloria Anzaldúa's “Speaking in tongues: A letter to 3rd world women writers.”The Southern Communication Journal, 62, 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949609373035(2001, Summer). Contesting pornography: Terministic catharsis and definitional argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 1–17.(2002). Keynote address: Argument in an off key. In G. ThomasGoodnight et al (Eds.), Communicative reason and communication communities (pp. 1–23). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.(2005, November). The male Madonna and the feminine Uncle Sam: Visual argument, icons, and ideographs in 1909 anti-woman suffrage postcards. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 91(4), 365–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335630500488325(2003). Control, resistance, and empowerment in raced, gendered, and classed work contexts: The case of African American women. Communication Yearbook, 27, 257–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15567419cy2701_9(1993). The public and the private: Gender, sexuality and emotion. In StephenFineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (pp. 167–189). London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219850(2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press., & (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.(1995). Families of the lesbian baby boom: Parents’ division of labor and children's adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 31, 115–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.11(2000). Family relationships of lesbian and gay men. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1052–1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01052.x([Page 299]1995). A mathematician reads the newspaper. New York: Basic Books.(2005). The number of words in the English language. The Global Language Monitor [Website]. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http://www.languagemonitor.com/wst_page7.html(1990). Speaking freely. New York: Pergamon Press.(2003). The discourse of African American women: A case for extended paradigms. In Ronald L.Jackson & Elaine B.Richardson (Eds.), Understanding African American rhetoric (pp. 293–307). New York: Routledge.(2004). The family lives of lesbians and gay men In Anita L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 233–248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., & (2000). The close relationship of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. In ClydeHendrick & Susan S.Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A source book (pp. 111–123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452220437, & (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.(1997). Spiraling discourses of reproductive and sexual rights: A post-Beijing assessment of international feminist politics. In Cathy J.Cohen, Kathleen B.Jones, & Joan C.Tronto (Eds.), Women transforming politics (pp. 569–587). New York: New York University Press.(2000). Gender and parent-child relationships. In David H.Demo, Katherine R.Allen, & Mark AFine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 82–104). New York: Oxford University Press., , , & (1999). Where gender/power/politics collide: Deconstructing organizational maternity leave policy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 168–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105649269982011, & (Pheterson, Gail. (Ed.). (1989). A vindication of the rights of whores. Seattle, WA: Seal Press.1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.(1998). Don't try and make out that I'm nice! The different strategies women and men use when gossiping. In JenniferCoates (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (254–269). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.(1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Putnam.(2004). The influence of gender and social role on the interpretation of facial expressions. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 51(3–4), 187–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037762.10349.13, , & (1997). Muscle dysphoria: An underrecognized form of body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics, 38, 548–557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182%2897%2971400-2, , , , & (2000). The Adonis complex: The secret crisis of male body obsession. New York: Simon & Schuster., , & (2004). Feeding desire: Fatness, beauty and sexuality among a Saharan people. London: Routledge.(2003, Spring). Women in traditional religions: Refusing to let patriarchy (or feminism) separate us from the source of our liberation. Mississippi College Law Review, 22, 185–214.(Price, Janet, & Shildrick, Margrit. (Eds.). (1999). Feminist theory and the body: A reader. New York: Routledge.[Page 300]2002). The apotheosis of home and the maintenance of spaces of violence. Hypatia, 17(4), 39–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01073.x(ProEnglish. (n.d.). Who we are: All about ProEnglish. Retrieved March 26, 2005, from http://www.proenglish.org/main/gen-info.htm1999). Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 10–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001002, , & (2001). Muscular Christianity: Manhood and sports in Protestant America, 1880–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1997). “I don't speak spritch”: Locating lesbian language. In AnnaLivia & KiraHall (Eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 214–232). New York: Oxford University Press.(2002, June). Sexual harassment and masculinity: The power and meaning of “girl watching.”Gender & Society, 16(3), 386–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243202016003007(1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.(1986). Rethinking gender research in communication. Journal of Communication, 36, 11–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01447.x(1976). Men's cycles (they have them too you know). In Alexandra G.Kaplan & Joan P.Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes (pp. 137–142). Boston: Little, Brown.(2004). Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Men and Women in the Church and in the World. Retrieved December 22, 2006, from http://www.wf-f.org/BenedictXVI.html(1985). Sexism and the war system. New York: Teachers College Press.(2001). Spice girls, nice girls, girlies, and tomboys: Gender discourse, girls’ cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. Gender and Education, 13(2), 153–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540250120051178(2004, October 10). “Supermoms” draw line in sandbox; Today's mothers are dropping out of the work force by the thousands: ‘Ideally, everyone would have this choice.’Chicago Sun-Times, p. 24.(2000). The relational code: Deciphering genetic and social influences on adolescent development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2003). Liberal irony, rhetoric, and feminist thought: A unifying third wave feminist theory. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 36(4), 330–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/par.2004.0005, & (2003). Intimate partner violence, 1993–2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.(1979). On lies, secrets, an silence. New York: W. W. Norton.(1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5, 631–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/493756(1986). Blood, bread, and poetry: Selected prose 1979–1985. New York: W. W. Norton.(1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.(2003). Communication in Korea: Playing things by eye. In Larry A.Samovar & Richard E.Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader ((10th ed., pp. 57–64). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.1996). African-American women in the civil rights movement, 1954–1965: Gender, leadership, and micromobilization. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1661–1693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230870(1887). Mental differences between men and women. Nineteenth Century, 21, 654–672.([Page 301]Roof, Judith, & Weigman, Robyn. (Eds.). (1995). Who can speak? Authority and critical identity. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.1987). Bibliography of berdache and alternative gender roles among North American Indians. Journal of Homosexuality, 14, 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v14n03_06(1996). The ties that bind women to violent premarital relationships. In Dudley D.Cahn & Sally A.Lloyd (Eds.), Family violence from a communication perspective (pp. 151–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(Rothenberg, Paula S. (Ed.). (2001). Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study (5th. ed.). New York: Worth.1994). Organizations through the lens of gender: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 47, 583–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700601, & (2004). Second thoughts: Seeing conventional wisdom through the sociological eye (, & (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In CaroleVance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). London: Victor Gollancz.(2001). Dress code: Meaning and messages in American culture ((2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.1989). Maternal thinking. New York: Ballantine Books.(2000). Gender, marriage, and diverse possibilities for cross-sex and same-sex pairs. In David H.Demo, Katherine R.Allen, & Mark A.Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 59–81). New York: Oxford University Press., & (2002). An educator's primer on the gender war. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(3), 235–241.(1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Simon & Schuster., & (2005). Closing the gender gap—again! Just when educators thought it was no longer an issue, gender bias is back in a new context. Principal, 84(4), 18–22., & (2006). Individual differences versus social structural approaches to explaining demand-withdraw and social influence behaviors. In KathrynDindia & Daniel J.Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (, , & (2nd ed., pp. 379–395). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.1996). The chilly classroom climate: A guide to improve the education of women. Washington, DC: National Association for Women in Education., , & (1999). Parents’ attitudes and expectations about children's cross-gender behavior. Sex Roles, 40, 249–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018851005631, & (1995). Slave resistance and rhetorical self-definition: Spirituals as strategy. Western Journal of Communication, 59(3), 177–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319509374516(1958). The status of linguistics as a science. In David G.Mandelbaum (Ed.), Edward Sapir: Culture, language and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1929)(1998). Globalization and its discontents. New York: New Press.(2005). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York: Doubleday.(1995). Words of welfare: The poverty of social science and the social science of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.([Page 302]2003, Spring). Rhetorical pathologies and gender difference: An ideological examination of cultural discourse in Faulkner v. The Citadel. Women's Studies in Communication, 26(1), 27–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2003.10162451(1999). 24 years of house work … and the place is still a mess: My life in politics. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.(1975). The semantic derogation of woman. In BarrieThorne & NancyHenley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 64–75). Chicago: Newbury House.(1995). Female sex offenders. In Barbara K.Schwartz & Henry R.Cellini (Eds.), The sex offender: Corrections, treatments and legal practices (Vol. 1, pp. 5:1–5:22). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute., & (1990). Understanding sexual violence: A study of convicted rapists. Boston: Unwin Hyman.(1993). Maria W. Miller Stewart. In Karlyn KohrsCampbell (Ed.), Women public speakers in the United States, 1800–1925 (pp. 339–349). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.(1990). Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes, 13(1), 5–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544745(1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.299, & (2000). Thinking about gender, thinking about theory: Gender and emotional experience. In Agneta H.Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 3–23). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628191.002(1998, August). Three-year study documents nature of television violence. AAP News. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.aap.org/advocacy/shifrin898.htm(2005, February 28). Off-ramps and on-ramps: Keeping women on the road to success. Center for Work-Life Policy. Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://www.worklifepolicy.org/pdfs/news-pr10.pdf(2000). Alternative assessment of women and media based on NGO reviews of Section J, Beijing Platform for Action. WomanAction. Retrieved April 26, 2006, from http://www.womenaction.org/csw44/altrepeng.htm#recommend(1996, February). Postcolonial interventions in the rhetorical canon: An “other” view. Communication Theory, 6(1), 40–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00119.x(2002, June). Culture, communication, and the challenge of globalization. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 72–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180216560, & (2001). Communication and gender in the classroom. In Leslie P.Arliss & Deborah J.Borisoff (Eds.), Women and men communicating: Challenges and changes (, & (2nd ed., pp. 232–253). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.2004). Disciplining gender: Rhetorics of sex identity in contemporary US. culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.(2005, August). In a queer time and place and race: Intersectionality comes of age. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 91(3), 312–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335630500350368(1995, Winter). Dan Quayle on family values: Epideictic appeals in political campaigns. Southern Communication Journal, 60(2), 152–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949509372972(2002). Counter-hegemonic masculinity in hip hop music: An analysis of The Roots’ construction of masculinity in their music and in the media culture. Master's thesis, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT.(1987). Emma Goldman. Boston: Twayne.(1959). Studies in personal space. Sociometry, 22, 247–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2785668([Page 303]2000). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. New York: Simon & Schuster.(1985). Man made language ((2nd ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.1989). Invisible women: The schooling scandal. London: The Women's Press.(1988). Can the subaltern speak? In CaryNelson & LawrenceGrossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.(1996). The Spivak reader (DonnaLandry & GeraldMacLean, Eds.). New York: Routledge.(2004). Terror: A speech after 9–11. Boundary, 2, 31, 81–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01903659-31-2-81(2005, August). Body image and cultural background. Sociological Inquiry, 75(3), 297–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00124.x(2003, March). Justifying Kosovo: Representations of gendered violence and U.S. military intervention. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(1), 92–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0739318032000067047(1989). Desperately seeking difference. In LorraineGamman & MargaretMarshment (Eds.), The female gaze: Women as viewers of popular culture (pp. 112–129). Seattle, WA: Real Comet Press.(2003). Gender and swearing: A community practice. Women and Language, 26(2), 22–33.(1991). Gender and university teaching: A negotiated difference. Allbany: State University of New York Press., , & (2003). Bullying or sexual harassment? The missing discourse of rights in an era of zero tolerance. Arizona Law Review, 45, 783–799.(2005). Still no laughing matter: Sexual harassment in K-12 schools. In EmilieBuchwald, PamelaFletcher, & MarthaRoth (Eds.), Transforming a rape culture (Rev. ed., pp. 57–74). Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.(1998). The rise of the image, the fall of the word. New York: Oxford University Press.(1989, September). How rhetoric becomes real: Religious sources of gender identity. The Journal of Communication and Religion, 12, 24–33.(1980). Sex roles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall., & (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society, 12(2), 217–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012002005, & (2005a, September 20). Many women at elite colleges set career path to motherhood. The New York Times, p. 1.. (2005b, September 23). Background: Reporting on the aspirations of young women. New York Times on the Web. Retrieved March 3, 2006, from Lexis/Nexis.(2003). Cultural expressions of African American female athletes in intercollegiate sports. In AnneBolin & JaneGranskog (Eds.), Athletic intruders: Ethnographic research on women, culture and exercise. Albany: State University of New York Press.(1966). Phenomenological psychology. New York: Basic Books.(1998, May). Generic he in conversation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84, 209–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639809384214, & (1999). Human sexuality: Diversity in contemporary America. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield., , & ([Page 304]2005). Promising practices and implications for scaling up girls’ education: Report of the UN girls’ education initiative South Asia workshop help in Chandigarh, India, 20–22 September 2004. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.(1997). Nonverbal communication in nonhuman primates: Implications for the emergence of culture. In UllicaSegerstråle & PeterMolnár (Eds.), Nonverbal communication: Where nature meets culture (pp. 131–150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.(2004). Retrieved April 1, 2006, from http://www.sfwa.org/members/elgin/(2005). Masculinities in education. In Michael S.Kimmel, JeffHearn, & R. W.Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 213–229). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233833(1989). Covert intimacy: Closeness in men's friendships. In B. J.Risman & PepperSchwartz (Eds.), Gender and intimate relationships (pp. 71–86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.(2003). Schooled language: Language and gender in educational settings. In JanetHolmes & MiriamMeyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.(2005, Spring). Cultural feminization of Japanese men. Transcending Silence … Retrieved July 6, 2006, from http://www.albany.edu/ws/journal/journal_05/takizawa3.html(1998). Language and gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.(2000). Slut! Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York: HarperCollins.(1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.(1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.(1994a). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.(1994b). Talking from 9 to 5. New York: Avon Books.(2005, Winter). In focus: Postfeminism and contemporary media studies. Cinema Journal44 (2), 107–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cj.2005.0012, & (1992). The mismeasure of woman. New York: Simon & Schuster.(2001, Fall). Paradoxes: No simple matter. Women and Language, 26(2), 1–6., & (1991). Prime-time families: Television culture in postwar America. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1994, Fall). Epilogue: Prolegomenon to future feminist philosophies of religions. Hypatia, 9(4), 229–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00657.x(1995). Scorched earth: The military's assault on the environment. Philadelphia: New Society Press.(1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.(2003). Girls and boys together … but mostly apart: Gender arrangements in elementary schools. In EstelleDisch (Ed.), Reconstructing gender: A multicultural anthology (pp. 369–386). Boston: McGraw-Hill.(1993, Spring). “Better citizens without the ballot”: American anti-suffrage women and their rationale during the progressive era. Journal of Women's History, 5(1), 33–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2010.0279(1992). Gender in international relations. New York: Columbia University Press.([Page 305]1998). Asking about life. Ft. Worth, TX: Saunders College., & (1996, February). Militant motherhood: Labor's Mary Harris “Mother” Jones. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 82, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639609384137(2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford Press.(2000). Beauty, sexuality and identity: The social control of women. In Cheryl BrownTravis & Jacquelyn W.White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 237–272). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10345-010, , & (2001, November). Reproducing and resisting the master narrative of decline: Midlife professional women's experiences of aging. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(2), 183–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318901152002(2004, May). Practicing disorganization: The development of applied perspectives on living with tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 81–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000210007, & (1991). Hegemonic masculinity on the mound: Media representations of Nolan Ryan and American sports culture. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 290–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039109366799(2003). Incorporation and marginalization in the academy: From border toward center for faculty of color?Journal of Black Studies, 34, 112–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021934703253689(2004). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (, & (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Turner, Lynn H., & West, Richard. (Eds.). (2006a). The family communication sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2006b). Perspectives on family communication (, & (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.2004, January-March). Why women are at war with Chevron: Nigerian subsistence struggles against the international oil industry. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 39(1–2), 63–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021909604048251, & (2006, May 29). In the line of fire. Time, 167(22), 60–65.(2005, May 26). Bid to limit women in combat withdrawn. The Washington Post, p. A01.(Understanding Islam and the Muslims, (n.d.). USC-MSA compendium of Muslim texts. Retrieved November 9, 2005, from http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/introduction/understandingislam.html1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34, 1085–1094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.11.1085(1992). Women and gender: A feminist psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press., & (United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. (1995). Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. Violence against women. Retrieved December 21, 2005, from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/violence.htmU.S. Bureau of the Census. (2006, January 31). Father's Day: June 19. Facts for Features. Retrieved February 28, 2006, from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/004706.htmlU.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1999, July). Internet access and usage. In Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide (part 2). Retrieved July 5, 2006, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/part2.html[Page 306]U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000, October). Falling through the net, toward digital inclusion. Retrieved August 26, 2006, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn00/contents00.htmlU.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2003). Digest of educational statistics 2002. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005, September). Violence against women: Domestic and intimate partner violence. Womenshealth.gov. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.4woman.gov/violence/domestic.cfmU.S. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission. (2005, March 2). Sexual harassment. Retrieved February 21, 2006, from http://www.eeoc.gov/types/sexual_harassment.htmlU.S. General Accounting Office. (2002, January). A new look through the glass ceiling: Where are the women? The status of women in management in ten selected industries. Washington, DC: Author.2005, March). Feminism and the Vatican [Electronic version]. Theological Studies, 66(1), 159–177.(1995). Virtual equality. New York: Anchor Books.(1995, January). Queers, sissies, dykes, and tomboys: Deconstructing the conflation of “sex,” “gender,” and “sexual orientation” in Euro-American law and society. California Law Review, 83, 3–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3480882(1995). Editorial: The violence of text and talk. Discourse and Society, 6(3), pp. 307–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006003001(Vannoy, Dana. (Ed.). (2001). Gender stratification: Social interaction and structural accounts. Los Angeles: Roxbury.2002, September). Domesticating patriarchy: Hegemonic masculinity and television's “Mr. Mom.”Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(3), 352–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180216564(1999). Girls on the verge: Debutante, dips, drive-by, and other initiations. New York: St. Martin's Press.(2000). Sex differences in crying: Empirical findings and possible explanations. In Agneta H.Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 143–165). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628191.008, & (2002). Remaking universals? Transnational feminism(s) challenging fundamentalist ecumenism. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(1–2), 175–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026327602128931161(1999). Gender and family relationships. In MarvinSussman, Suzanne K.Steinmetz, & Gary W.Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family ((2nd ed., pp. 439–474). New York: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5367-7_172004, March 22). The case for staying home: Caught between the pressures of the workplace and the demands of being a mom, more women are sticking with the kids [Electronic version, Cover story]. Time, 163(12), p. 50.(1995). Material girls: Making sense of feminist cultural theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.. (2005, Fall). Children, adolescents, and the media: The molding of minds, bodies, and deeds. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 109, 63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.138(1999, August). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 237–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551994, & (2002). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone.(1999, March). Masculinizing the feminine: Inviting women online ca. 1997. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039909367069([Page 307]1998). Re-visioning gender and language research. Women and Language, 21(1), 1–9.(2002). Gender, language and discourse. London: Routledge.(1947). The theory of social and economic organizations ( & , Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.(2006, February). “I'm not thinking of it as sexual harassment”: Understanding harassment across race and citizenship. Gender & Society, 20(1), 87–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243205282785, , , & (1976). Dimity convictions: The American woman in the nineteenth century. Athens: Ohio University Press.(1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In BarrieThorne, CherisKramarae, & NancyHenley (Eds.), Language, gender, and society (pp. 103–119). Rowley, MA: Newbury House., & (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002, & (2004). Introducing communication (, & (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.2004, July/October). At the unlikely confluence of conservative religion and popular culture: Fight Club as heteronormative ritual. Text and Performance Quarterly, 24(3–4), 302–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1046293042000312788, & (1998). The emergence of lesbian sexuality and identity cross-culturally: Brazil, Peru, the Philippines, and the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(1), 31–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018605808229, , , & (1993). Homosexual orientation in twins: A report on 61 pairs and three triplet sets. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22(3), 187–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01541765, , & (2002). Men and masculinities: Key themes and new directions. Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.(2002, Spring). “Sounding Black” in the courtroom: Court-sanctioned racial stereotyping. Harvard Blackletter Journal, 18, 185–210.(1988). Sex bias in visual images evoked by generics: A New Zealand study. Sex Roles, 18, 159–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287786, & (2004, October 29). Reports show difficulty of sex-discrimination lawsuits. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A12.(1997). Brief reflections toward a multiplicative theory of praxis and being. In AdrienKatherine Wing (Ed.), Critical race feminism: A reader (pp. 27–34). New York: New York University Press.(1994). Running as a woman: Gender and power in American politics. New York: The Free Press., , & (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Anchor Books.(2001). The normalization of violence in heterosexual romantic relationships: Women's narratives of love and violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(2) 239–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407501182005(2005). Gendered lives: Communication, gender and culture ((6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.2007). Gendered lives: Communication, gender and culture ((7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.1998). What's the difference? A dialogue about differences and similarities between women and men. In Daniel J.Canary & KathrynDindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 19–39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., & ([Page 308]World Health Organization. (2002, October 2). First ever Global Report on Violence and Health released. Retrieved October 29, 2005, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/pr73/en/World Health Organization. (2005a). WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.World Health Organization. (2005b, November 24). Landmark study on domestic violence. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2005/pr62/en/index.html1982). Men's friendships, women's friendships, and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287670(2006). Toward an expanded orientation to the comparative study of women's and men's same-sex friendships. In Daniel J.Canary & KathrynDindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication ((2nd ed., pp. 37–58). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.1998). Bitch: In praise of difficult women. New York: Doubleday.(2002, October). Women take on oil companies in Nigeria. Economic Justice News Online, 5(3). Retrieved July 14, 2005, from http://www.50years.org/cms/ejn/story/82(1998). Factors influencing the contrast between men's and women's speech. Women and Language, 21(1), 40–46.(2000). Religion and family formation in Taiwan: The decline of ancestral authority. In Sharon K.Houseknecht & Jerry G.Pankhurst (Eds.), Family religion, and social change in diverse societies (pp. 121–146). Cambridge: Oxford University Press., , & (2004). Do boys and girls act differently in the classroom? A content analysis of student characters in educational psychology textbooks. Sex Roles, 51(1–2), 101–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000032318.91838.59, & (1990). Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.(1997). Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(1989). Feminism and the politics of power: Whose gaze is it anyway? In LorraineGamman & MargaretMarshment (Eds.), The female gaze: Women as viewers of popular culture (pp. 173–188). Seattle, WA: Real Comet Press.(2003, November). Blackophilia and blackophobia: White youth, the consumption of rap music, and white supremacy. Communication Theory, 13(4), 366–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00297.x(1997). Gender and nation. London: Sage.(1999). The ‘multi-layered citizen’: Citizenship in the age of globalization.’International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1(1), 119–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/146167499360068(1998). Thinking about race. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.(1995). The “Promiscuous Audience” controversy and the emergence of the early women's rights movement. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81, 191–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384108(2001). Mars and Venus: Unequal planets. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27(1), 55–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb01139.x, , & (1997). Toward a Gramscian critical rhetoric. Western Journal of Communication, 61(1), 66–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319709374562(
About the Authors