• Entry
  • Reader's guide
  • Entries A-Z
  • Subject index

Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial–Revised (ECST–R)

Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial–Revised (ECST–R) is a semistructured interview that is designed to assess criminal defendants' capacities as they relate to courtroom proceedings. In Dusky v. United States(1960), the U.S. Supreme Court established the three basic prongs required for competency to stand trial: (1) factual understanding of the proceedings, (2) rational understanding of the proceedings, and (3) rational ability to consult with counsel. The ECST–R was developed and validated for assessment of the Dusky prongs. In addition, the ECST–R includes a specific screen for feigned incompetency.

Description and Development

Prototypical analysis with competency experts identified core representative items for three ECST–R competency scales: Factual Understanding of the Courtroom Proceedings (FAC), Rational Understanding of the Courtroom Proceedings (RAC), and Consult with Counsel (CWC). Prototypical items were ...

    • Loading...
    locked icon

    Sign in to access this content

    Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

    • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
    • Read modern, diverse business cases
    • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles