O'Connor v. Ortega

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, houses, papers, and effects. However, this protection limits governmental searches and seizures only-citizens are not guaranteed protection from unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by private citizens or organizations. The central issue in O'Connor v. Ortega (1987) was whether officials at a public hospital violated a doctor's Fourth Amendment rights. The Supreme Court held that public employees have reasonable expectations of privacy in their offices and that their employers must meet strict criteria to conduct legal searches of these areas.

Facts of the Case

O'Connor involved a doctor employed at a state hospital who trained physicians in its psychiatric residency program. After being accused of misconduct, including acquiring a computer ...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles