Counterplan

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Entry
  • Entries A-Z

  • Part of argumentation theory in communication, commonly exploited in the activity of policy debate. It allows the negative viewpoint to defend a separate plan. In that plan, the counterplan has to be nontopical and competitive, have advantages and disadvantages, and be effectively used along with a disadvantage. The affirmative viewpoint needs to expose the flaws in the counterplan and show why the ideas presented by the negative viewpoint are a bad idea. When someone argues in a debate with a counterplan, the object is to explain what the negative viewpoint is and why it should be done. In summary, a counterplan allows a nontopical, reasonable alternative to the affirmative plan. Such reasoning is often used in hypothesis testing in social science methodology.

    10.4135/9781412972024.n582

    Looks like you do not have access to this content.

    Login

    Don’t know how to login?

    Click here for free trial login.

    • [0-9]
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • U
    • V
    • W
    • X
    • Y
    • Z

    Back to Top

    Copy and paste the following HTML into your website