Guide to U.S. Foreign Policy: A Diplomatic History

Books

Edited by: Robert J. McMahon & Thomas W. Zeiler

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Part I: The Development and Growth of American Foreign Policy

    Part II: The United States on the International Stage

    Part III: Diplomacy and Foreign Policy between the Wars

    Part IV: Diplomacy Stretched to its Limits: The Early Cold War Era

    Part V: The End of the Cold War

    Part VI: New Thresholds of Diplomacy

    Part VII: Diplomatic Dilemmas in the Post-9/11 World

  • Dedication

    Dedicated to Thomas G. Paterson: valued mentor, sterling role model, and good friend

    RobertJ.McMahon

    Dedicated to Stephen Pelz, Robert Schulzinger, and Alfred Eckes Jr.: teachers, guides, and friends

    ThomasW.Zeiler

    Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    List of Illustrations

    About the Editors

    Robert J. McMahon is the Ralph Mershon Distinguished Professor of History at the Ohio State University. He also has taught at the University of Florida and served as a visiting professor at the University of Virginia, the Free University of Berlin, and as the Mary Ball Washington Chair at University College Dublin. In 2010, he was the keynote speaker at the international research seminar in Beijing, in which he spoke on the rise and fall of America's alliances in “Cold War Asia.”

    He is the author of, among other books, Dean Acheson and the Creation of an American World Order (2009); The Limits of Empire: The United States and Southeast Asia since World War II (1999); and Cold War on the Periphery: The United States, India, and Pakistan (1994). He is working on a book on the Cold War in the Third World.

    Dr. McMahon has served as president of the Society of Historians of American Foreign Relations and currently serves as a member of the U.S. State Department Historical Society Committee.

    Thomas W. Zeiler is the director of the Global Studies Academic Program and professor of history and international affairs at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He teaches, among other topics, American foreign relations, war and society, international trade, America's political economy, European integration, and globalization.

    Included among his many awards, honors, and grants is the Stuart L. Bernath Lecture Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (SHAFR). His numerous publications include American Foreign Relations since 1600: A Guide to the Literature (editor of three editions); Globalization and the American Century Annihilation: A Global Military History of World War II; and Dean Rusk: Defending the American Mission Abroad.

    Dr. Zeiler is the editor of Diplomatic History, the only journal devoted to the history of U.S. diplomacy and foreign relations, examining strategic issues from the colonial period to the present. In 2011, Dr. Zeiler joined the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation at the U.S. Department of State.

    Contributors

    Lloyd E. Ambrosius

    University of Nebraska-Lincoln

    Andrew D. Barnes

    Georgia State University

    Mark Benbow

    Marymount University

    Henry Brands

    Duke University

    Paul Thomas Chamberlin

    University of Kentucky

    Jessica M. Chapman

    Williams College

    Jason Colby

    University of Victoria

    Andrew DeRoche

    Front Range Community College

    Gregory Domber

    University of North Florida

    Anne Foster

    Indiana University

    Max Paul Friedman

    American University

    Joseph A. “Andy” Fry

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas

    Marc Gallicchio

    Villanova University

    James L. Gormly

    Washington and Jefferson College

    Jussi M. Hanhimäki

    Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva

    Mary Ann Heiss

    Kent State University

    George C. Herring, Emeritus

    University of Kentucky

    Howard Jones

    University of Alabama

    Ross Kennedy

    Illinois State University

    Mark Atwood Lawrence

    University of Texas at Austin

    James Lutz

    Indiana University-Purdue University at Fort Wayne

    Michelle Mart

    Pennsylvania State University

    James I. Matray

    California State University, Chico

    William B. McAllister

    U.S. Department of State

    Francine McKenzie

    University of Western Ontario

    John Moser

    Ashland University

    Kenneth Osgood

    Colorado School of Mines

    Nicole M. Phelps

    University of Vermont

    Robert Rakove

    United States Study Centre, University of Sydney

    Jason Roberts

    Quincy College

    Thomas Robertson Worcester Polytechnic Institute

    J. Simon Rofe

    University of London

    Daniel Sargent

    University of California, Berkeley

    Richard A. Sauers

    Director, Packwood Museum

    Robert W. Smith

    Worcester State University

    John Stoner

    University of Pittsburgh

    Stephen M. Streeter

    McMaster University

    Christopher Tudda

    U.S. Department of State

    Andreas Wenger

    ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology), Zurich

    Carol K. Winkler

    Georgia State University

    Yafeng Xia

    Long Island University

    David Zierler

    U.S. Department of State

    Foreword

    When President George Washington warned Americans to avoid binding commitments to other nations in his oft-quoted “Farewell Address” in 1796, he was responding both to the exigencies of his times as well as laying out principles for the future. While he alluded to French intrigues that risked drawing the young nation into European conflicts (and Europeans into American affairs), he also understood that the United States would remain involved in world commerce. Remarkably, Washington predicted the tension between isolationism and interventionism, the sway of both domestic and foreign influences, and the pursuit of American prosperity and safety alongside empire and war. Above all, he said the country must retain its freedom, freedom as a value as well as an action.

    As the following chapters in The Guide to U.S. Foreign Policy: A Diplomatic History attest, the foreign policy of the United States in the ensuing decades adhered to Washington's admonition. In the meantime, the United States gained “the strength of a Giant,” as Washington also predicted, as it had moved from a disparate collection of upstart colonies to a unipolar superpower that found itself defending the status quo. The nation was not immune to crises, as terrorism most recently has shown. Hegemony has its price. The contributors of this volume have explained how America reached the point of defending freedom, after a start in which it merely sought it.

    We are indebted to the authors of the Guide who we believe represent, as a collective, unparalleled expertise on matters of U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy. Moreover, they were given a huge task, one different from the standard encyclopedia of foreign affairs that exists on the market. In a matter of just months, forty scholars contributed ten-thousand word narratives that not only cover the chronology of their topics and the leading issues of each period, but also feature key concepts and shifts in policy, noteworthy people, and primary documents to illustrate further the significance of the history. Both topical and historical, the Guide certainly gives its audience an idea of the broad scope of U.S. foreign relations and a primer on current events. Readers will note that while most of the chapters drill deeply into a certain time period, a handful lay out the “diplomatic milestones” that provide an overview of an entire era. Within every chapter are vignettes of key moments and major shifts in foreign policy-making and a biographical sketch or “public portrait” that focuses on the influential actors of the period, many of whom speak “in their own words” about a crucial issue. The result, we editors believe, is brilliant! And useful.

    As editors, we have been impressed not only with the thoroughness of the coverage provided by the contributors, but also with their ability to keep an eye on the relevance of their topic to history as well as to contemporary affairs. In these forty chapters, readers will find a solid basis to understand the change and contours of American foreign relations, and a means to judge both present policies and future challenges.

    Additionally, the editorial staff of DWJ Books proved shrewd, balanced, and accommodating in their treatment of each chapter. To deal with such a large number of authors and topics, and make the whole product nearly uniform in tone and quality, was no mean feat. We offer our deepest thanks to the DWJ staff, Lauren Fedorko, who masterminded the entire project, and the authors who produced this unique and valuable guide to U.S. foreign policy.

    ThomasW.Zeiler

    Introduction: The History and Role of American Foreign Relations

    America's dramatic ascension from the lowly status of vulnerable and precarious republic at its founding to the exalted position of global superpower surely constitutes one of the most improbable, compelling, and important tales in modern world history. During the early national period, presidents and secretaries of state needed to navigate the treacherous shoals of a mostly hostile external environment, and they did so with some marked success. From then until the emergence of the United States as a fledgling world power at the end of the nineteenth century, this upstart nation-state on the North American continent posed fundamental challenges to the traditional powers of Europe and to the international system they upheld. What role would—and could—a non-European power play in a Eurocentric world order? America's stunning internal expansion and economic transformation, coupled with two devastating world wars, provided a definitive answer to that question. World War II irrevocably shattered the old European order. In its wake, the United States firmly grasped the reins of world leadership, reins it has held ever since.

    Boasting vast industrial and economic power, a burgeoning military capability, atomic and nuclear weaponry, a stable, liberal political order, and an expansive culture, the United States became the most powerful country on earth during the second half of the twentieth century. It remains so today, even if some of the economic bases of its preeminence appear to be eroding. Since the collapse two decades ago of the Soviet Union, America's only serious rival, and the concomitant end of the Cold War, it has become commonplace to label the United States the world's lone superpower, or “hyperpower,” as a French diplomat termed it in the late 1990s. Yet American policymakers frequently, if somewhat paradoxically, also have been haunted by fears about their country's vulnerability over the past two generations. From their deep apprehension about the threats posed to U.S. national security by the Soviet Union, China, and Communist ideology during the Cold War to their preoccupation since the terrorist attacks of 9/11 with radical Islamic jihadists, American elites have devoted enormous energy and resources to containing or eliminating the perils lurking in the external environment. That, too, has constituted a hallmark of U.S. foreign policy.

    By any standard of measurement, the United States has been the dominant force in world affairs for at least the past seventy years, economically, politically, ideologically, militarily, and culturally. It has placed its own indelible stamp on the contemporary international system, having forged many of the transnational institutions and multilateral organizations that still shape today's world. At the same time, it has influenced the aspirations, mores, tastes, living standards, and sometimes resentments and hatreds of hundreds of millions of ordinary people across the globe. It has also gone to war on numerous occasions. Few subjects, consequently, loom larger in modern world history and in contemporary international relations than the often-uneasy encounter between the United States and the nations and peoples beyond its shores.

    The Guide to U.S. Foreign Policy: A Diplomatic History seeks to introduce students and general readers alike to this crucial subject: the complex, often colorful, and invariably controversial and contested history and role of American foreign relations and expansion. Each of the essays herein has been written by a leading expert on the topic at hand. Each author has striven to present a balanced interpretive overview of a particular historical period or topical subject, drawing from and building on the most up-to-date scholarship. A handful of the contributions, termed “Diplomatic Milestones” essays, offers a synthetic, thematic treatment of a longer period of time, building upon several of the more focused chapters that immediately precede it.

    Taken together, these essays offer a remarkably broad-based examination of America's rise to power and its exercise of global leadership, with several contributions even looking toward the future. This combination of essays focused on U.S. diplomatic history, with another set devoted to topical and contemporary subjects, represents one of the Guide's distinctive features. The essays herein do not conform to any one interpretive viewpoint or analytical approach. Instead, the editors have encouraged all of the contributors to approach their subjects from the perspective they considered most compelling and appropriate, while pointing readers wherever possible to alternative or contending interpretations. A number of the contributions reflect the fresh and innovative approaches that have marked much of the newer scholarly literature about U.S. foreign relations. Efforts to place U.S. foreign relations in the widest possible international perspective are well represented here; so, too, are efforts to explicate America's external behavior in terms of such constructs as culture, ideology, race, and gender. State-to-state relations are well covered throughout the work, as is natural and appropriate, but many essays also stress the role of nonstate actors and the importance of intercultural interchanges, unofficial contacts, and commercial and intellectual linkages.

    Every one of the forty substantive chapters that follow is organized in a similarly distinctive format. In addition to an analytical narrative that forms the heart of each contribution, the essays all contain an important primary source (“In Their Own Words”) tied to one of the essay's main themes. These range from public speeches, to foreign policy “doctrines,” to once top secret policy documents, and much more. In addition, the essays all include a “Public Portrait,” or brief biography, of a leading figure, American or non-American, who is featured prominently in the narrative or whose career proves emblematic of a key trend or theme sketched therein. Each essay features as well one or more “Key Concepts,” developed in a short section that explicates one of the chief concepts, principles, or policies highlighted in that particular chapter. Finally, and significantly, the authors each provide a longer section, termed “Shifts in Foreign Policy,” which critically examines a central event or turning point during the period covered by their essays.

    We are convinced that the multiplicity of voices and approaches contained in this comprehensive volume constitutes a singular strength. It is our conviction that the rich diversity represented here will expose readers most effectively to the complexities of America's interactions, past and present, with the larger world, and to the vast scholarly literature that this subject has inspired. It is our fondest hope that the Guide to U.S. Foreign Policy will stimulate much fruitful discussion and debate. We would be delighted if the wide-ranging collection of essays offered here also inspires continued engagement with and further reading about the history and role of American foreign relations.

    RobertJ.McMahon
    10.4135/9781452235370.d1
  • The Handbook of Key Diplomatic Terms, Events, and Organizations

    This handbook is a guide to identifying and understanding the essential concepts, rationales, incidents, and treaties that have been a part of and that have shaped U.S. diplomatic history since the nation's beginning. The handbook also defines nongovernmental players, international organizations or groups that often influence American foreign policy. Dates are included throughout to help the reader recognize the historical context of each term. For additional explanation, each entry is cross-referenced to the chapter(s) in which it is also discussed.

    A

    Adams-Onís Treaty (1819): Also known as the Transcontinental Treaty, agreement reached between the governments of Spain and the United States. U.S. Secretary of State John Quincy Adams and the Spanish Minister to the United States, Don Luis de Onís y Gonzalez, negotiated the agreement in order to settle differences between the two nations. Under the terms of the treaty, Spain ceded East Florida to the United States. In exchange, the United States assumed payment of Americans’ claims against the Spanish government, up to $5 million, for damages caused by Native American raids. The treaty also established the border between the western edge of the Louisiana Territory and Spanish Mexico. The boundary was established beginning at the Sabine River north from the Gulf of Mexico to the thirty-second parallel north, then due north to the Red River, west along the Red River to the one-hundredth meridian west, north to the Arkansas River, west to its headwaters, north to the forty-second parallel, and finally westward along that parallel to the Pacific Ocean. See alsoChapter 2.

    African Union (AU): Launched in 2002, international organization of fifty-three independent African nations which replaced the Organization of African Unity (OAU) and is based loosely on the European Union (EU). The AU is Africa's foremost institution and major organization for the promotion of socioeconomic assimilation of the continent, leading to greater unity and solidarity among African countries and peoples. It is based on the common vision of a united and strong Africa; the need to build a partnership between governments and all segments of civil society, including women, youth, and the private sector; and the objective of establishing the necessary conditions that enable the continent to play its rightful role in the global economy and international negations. As a continental organization, it focuses on the promotion of peace, security, and stability for the implementation of the development of Africa. See alsoChapter 37.

    al Qaeda: Established in 1988, international terrorist organization, founded by the fundamentalist militant Osama bin Laden, which calls for global jihad. Al Qaeda transliterates from the Arabic as “the base.” Al Qaeda ideologues envision the complete elimination of any foreign, namely Western, influences in Muslim nations and the creation of a new Islamic caliphate. Among the organization's reported beliefs are that a Christian-Jewish alliance is conspiring to destroy Islam and that the killing of civilians is religiously justified. Al Qaeda has attacked civilian and military targets in numerous nations, including Tanzania, Kenya, Turkey, Great Britain, and Spain. Most notably, al Qaeda was responsible for the September 11 attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C., in 2001, to which the U.S. government responded by launching a War on Terror. In May 2011, bin Laden was killed at his hideout in Abbottabad, Pakistan, by U.S. Navy Seals. Other al Qaeda members are presumed to be based in the mountainous tribal border region between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Known al-Qaeda affiliates operate in Iraq, the Arabian Peninsula, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, Egypt, the Maghreb, and the far western regions of China. See alsoChapters 34 and 40.

    AlabamaClaims: A disagreement between the United States and Great Britain concerning the capture, damage, or destruction of a number of Union merchant ships during the American Civil War (1861–1865). The CSS Alabama and other Confederate raiders were built in British ports, and the British government allowed the Confederacy to buy these vessels, after which the British-built ships attacked Northern shipping and helped break the Union blockade of Southern ports. The North claimed that these actions violated Britain's official stance of neutrality. After the war, the United States demanded that Britain pay for the damage. Discussion of the issue dragged on for several years. Finally, in 1872, after international arbitration supported the American position, Britain settled the issue by paying the United States $15.5 million for the damages inflicted by the warships built in Britain and sold to the Confederacy, thus ending the dispute and ensuring friendly relations. The use of arbitration led to a movement to codify international law with the hope of finding peaceful solutions to international disputes. See alsoChapter 3.

    Allied powers: Name given to the nations of Great Britain, France, and Russia during World War I (1914–1918). These first three Allied powers were also known as the Triple Entente. Joining the Triple Entente's fight against the Central powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria, were Japan, Italy, and, in 1917, the United States, as well as numerous other nations. The Allies defeated the Central powers when Germany agreed to an armistice on November 11, 1918. The name was used again during World War II (1939–1945) to describe the nations fighting the Axis powers of Germany, Italy, and Japan. The victorious Allied powers included Great Britain, France, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Luxemburg, and many other European nations. The Soviet Union joined the Allies on June 22, 1941, after Adolf Hitler's armies invaded. The United States joined the Allies after the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, and numerous other nations joined the Allies as the war progressed. Italy surrendered unconditionally to the Allies in September 1943, and Germany surrendered unconditionally on May 8, 1945. Japan continued fighting until after the United States dropped atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japan surrendered on August 14, 1945. See alsoChapters 8 and 9.

    ambassador: The highest ranking diplomat representing a nation, an ambassador who has plenipotentiary authority. In modern usage, most ambassadors on foreign postings carry the full title of ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary. See alsoChapter 2.

    America First Committee (AFC): Organization opposed to U.S. involvement in World War II (1939–1945), which insisted on a policy of isolationism as the war spread through western Europe. Founded in September 1940 by two Yale University scholars, R. Douglas Stuart and Kingman Brewster, the group drew upon the widespread noninterventionist sentiment present in the United States after World War I (1914–1918). The AFC eventually grew to include about 850,000 members. Among its backers were Robert McCormick, the wealthy and influential publisher of the Chicago Tribune, and Robert Wood, chairperson of the board of Sears Roebuck and Co. One of the most prominent and outspoken members of the AFC was Charles A. Lindbergh, who, in 1927, had become the first pilot to fly solo across the Atlantic. The AFC also gained the support of many members of Congress, including senators William Borah of Idaho, Burton Wheeler of Montana, and Gerald Nye of North Dakota. Rather than military intervention, the AFC supported the development of homeland defenses to make the United States invulnerable to foreign attack. After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on December 7, 1941, the AFC promptly disbanded. See alsoChapter 13.

    apartheid: A legally sanctioned system of racial segregation and oppressive government policies in South Africa, enforced between 1948 and 1994 by the ruling National Party. The term apartheid comes from the Afrikaans word meaning “apartness.” It was coined in the 1930s, but the policy dates back to white settlement in 1652. Following the general election of 1948, new legislation classified inhabitants into racial groups (“white,” “black,” “coloured,” and “Indian”), and residential areas were segregated, sometimes by forced removals. Apartheid sparked significant internal resistance and violence as well as a long trade embargo against South Africa. Beginning in the 1980s, popular uprisings and protests were met with the banning of opposition and imprisoning of antiapartheid leaders. As unrest spread and became more turbulent, state organizations responded with increasing repression and state-sponsored violence. Although reforms to apartheid in the 1980s failed to quell opposition, in 1990, President Frederik Willem de Klerk began negotiations to end apartheid, culminating in 1994 in a multiracial democratic election. The African National Congress (ANC), under Nelson Mandela who became South Africa's first black president, won the 1994 elections. See alsoChapter 21.

    appeasement: The strategy of settling conflicts by meeting the demands of an opponent. The concept or policy of appeasement is associated most often with the 1938 Munich Agreement, in which British and French leaders conceded German control of a region of western Czechoslovakia known as the Sudetenland, which had a large ethnic German population. See alsoChapters 12 and 14.

    arbitration: A dispute resolution process in which the disputing parties submit to a neutral third party who examines all the appropriate evidence and then makes a decision that resolves the dispute. An early example of proposed arbitration in U.S. diplomatic history is the 1794 Jay Treaty, in which the British agreed to settle a number of disagreements through arbitration, thus helping establish the precedent. See alsoChapters 2 and 4.

    armistice: The cessation of fighting between warring parties, which may be temporary or which may lead to a permanent end of the war. World War I (1914–1918) ended with the armistice of November 11, 1918, which led to an uneasy peace under the Treaty of Versailles (1919). The fighting of the Korean War (1950–1953) terminated with the armistice of July 27, 1953. Technically, a state of war still exists between the Koreas, because the countries have not signed a formal peace treaty. See alsoChapters 9 and 19.

    arms race: The competition for military superiority between two or more nations to build the best armed forces, which includes increasing the size of the army and navy, stockpiling larger numbers of weapons, and improving military technology. In general, no absolute goal exists, only the relative goal of remaining ahead of the competitors. Beginning about 1890, an arms race occurred among the European Powers of Germany, France, Russia, and Great Britain. One of the primary causes of World War I was an arms race. After 1933, Japan, Italy, and Germany steadily developed their armed forces to make them equal or superior to the existing forces of France, Britain, and the United States. At the beginning of the Cold War, a nuclear arms race broke out between the United States and the Soviet Union. See alsoChapters 21 and 24.

    Atlantic Charter (1941): Agreement reached between President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945) and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on August 9, 1941. Meeting secretly on the British battleship Prince of Wales off the Newfoundland coast, the two leaders framed and announced the charter, which set out the joint aims of Great Britain and the United States, including a common set of principles against Nazi aggression. The charter renounced territorial aggrandizement and proclaimed “the rights of all peoples” to choose their form of government. It also affirmed freedom of the seas and expressed hope for the “abandonment of the use of force” in international affairs. It further promised “freedom from fear and want” and called for the establishment of an international body to serve as an arbiter of disputes and protector of the peace, thus laying the foundation for the Charter of the United Nations (UN) in 1945. See alsoChapter 13.

    Axis powers: During World War II (1939–1945), the nations of Germany, Italy, and Japan, who fought and lost against the Allies—Great Britain, France, the United States, the Soviet Union, China, and a host of other nations. Italy surrendered unconditionally to the Allies in early September 1943; Germany surrendered unconditionally on May 8, 1945; Japan continued fighting until August 1945. See alsoChapter 14.

    B

    balance of power: The existence of parity and stability between competing nations. Preserving a balance of power between nations has probably existed since ancient times. In 1815, after the Napoleonic Wars, Austrian Chancellor Klemens von Metternich organized what became known as the Concert of Europe, or the Congress of Vienna, to prevent the rise of a single dominant state or coalition and to establish a balance of power in Europe. In the later years of the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union, two superpowers, attempted to attain a balance of power through détente. See alsoChapter 1.

    Bay of Pigs: Failed invasion of Cuba in April 1961 by anti-Castro forces who were aided secretly by the United States. The covert military operation had the approval of the outgoing administration of President Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961). Soon after President John F. Kennedy (1961–1963) took office, a group of Cuban émigrés, who had been planning to overthrow the Communist regime of Fidel Castro, invaded Cuba at the Bahia de Cochinos (Bay of Pigs). They hoped, with the help of uprisings in Cuba, to oust Castro and establish a more democratic government. They were disastrously defeated. Castro's forces were forewarned and well armed, and the uprisings within Cuba did not occur. In addition, the invading exiles did not have adequate weapons and almost no air cover for their landing. Most of the invaders, more than eleven hundred, were captured, and 114 were killed. See alsoChapter 31.

    Berlin airlift: The American and British response to the Soviet blockade of Berlin, Germany, which began in summer 1948. After World War II (1939–1945), Germany was divided into four zones with the Soviet Union, the United States, Great Britain, and France each occupying one zone. Similarly, the German capital of Berlin was divided into four occupation zones. After the United States, Britain, and France set up a common German government (which later became West Germany) in the zones they controlled in summer 1948, the Soviets blockaded all roads, railroads, and canals leading from West Germany to Berlin. Were the blockade successful, two million Berliners in the western sector would either starve or succumb to communism. Fearing that war might result if the Western powers sent armed forces to relieve Berlin, the United States and Britain decided to airlift food and supplies to the city. Through summer 1948 and winter 1948–1949, American and British planes flew about 2.5 million tons of food and supplies, including coal, to the West Berliners. On May 12, 1949, after establishing a separate government in East Berlin, the Soviets finally ended the blockade. Berlin, however, remained a contentious issue between the West and the Soviet Union until the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. See alsoChapter 24.

    Berlin Wall: Barrier between East Berlin and West Berlin (in East Germany), construction of which began in August 1961 at the direction of the Soviet Union. The wall, built of concrete and wire, became one of the most significant symbols of the Cold War; erected in the middle of a politically divided city, it was supposed to stop the emigration of East Germans to the freer and more prosperous West. In response to the Soviet's provocative action, President John F. Kennedy (1961–1963) enlarged all branches of the military and sent additional troops to Europe. He also sent Vice President Lyndon Johnson to West Berlin to assure its citizens of the determination of the United States to protect the city. Later in July 1963, Kennedy himself went to West Berlin to demonstrate U.S. solidarity with the city. The Berlin Wall remained a potential hot spot until the fall of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989. The wall was demolished that same year. See alsoChapters 24 and 28.

    big stick diplomacy: Foreign-policy principle associated with President Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909), especially concerning his policies in Latin America. The term originated from the African proverb, “Speak softly and carry a big stick.” Wielding his “big stick,” Roosevelt used force or the implication of force throughout the Caribbean region to obtain rights to build the Panama Canal, to control Cuba's internal affairs through the Platt Amendment, and to protect U.S. interests by deploying American troops to several Latin American nations. See alsoChapters 7 and 9.

    bilateral: Of or referring to an agreement between two agencies, parties, or nations. Bilateralism is a foreign policy strategy that describes the political and cultural relations between two nations; for example, the United States and Canada cooperate bilaterally on issues of defense. The vast majority of diplomatic relations takes place on the bilateral level. See alsoChapters 14 and 19.

    Boxer Rebellion: In China, a 1900 uprising by a secret organization called the Boxers (in Chinese, “righteous, harmonious fists”). The Boxers took over foreign property, massacred about 300 foreigners, and besieged other outsiders in Peking (now Beijing), China's capital. The four major European powers, Great Britain, France, Germany, and Russia, joined by the United States and Japan, sent a joint expeditionary force to protect their nationals and their property. Many believed that China would be carved up as each nation established its own Chinese colonies. U.S. Secretary of State John Hay announced that it was the policy of the United States to preserve Chinese territory and safeguard the principles of the open door policy. Reluctantly, the other powers agreed and China was not occupied. However, China was forced to pay a huge indemnity of $333,000,000 for damage sustained during the rebellion. The U.S. share was about $24,000,000; realizing that this sum was too much, American officials gave back half of it to provide for education for Chinese students coming to the United States. See alsoChapter 6.

    Bretton Woods system: An organized method of global monetary management that established the ground rules for international trade and finance among the world's major industrial nations. The Bretton Woods system was the first example of agreed-upon financial policies and institutions designed to govern monetary affairs among independent nations. As World War II (1939–1945) was still raging, 730 delegates from all forty-four Allied nations gathered in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, at the Mount Washington Hotel, for the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference. During the first three weeks of July, the delegates deliberated upon and signed the Bretton Woods agreements, thus laying the groundwork to rebuild a stable international economic system and establishing the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), which today is part of the World Bank Group. In 1945, these organizations became operational after the required number of countries ratified the agreement. Based on a stable U.S. dollar with a value fixed in gold, the agreements became obsolete by March 1973, as foreign economies grew stronger and the dollar grew relatively weaker. See alsoChapter 16.

    brinkmanship: The art or practice, especially in international affairs, of seeking advantage over opponents by creating the impression that one is willing and able to push an extremely dangerous situation to the brink of disaster, rather than concede. In 1956, after ten years of Cold War with the Soviet Union, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, who served under President Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961), pointed out the paradoxical situation: “The ability to get to the verge without getting into the war is the necessary art. If you cannot master it, you inevitably get into war. If you try to run away from it, if you are scared to go to the brink you are lost.” Perhaps the most infamous example of brinkmanship was the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. See alsoChapters 21 and 24.

    C

    capitalism: Economic system based on free enterprise in which individuals or businesses, rather than government, own the means of production: land, labor, and capital. In a capitalist society, where there is an unrestricted exchange of ideas, individuals or businesses also contribute entrepreneurship. The system was proposed by Scottish philosopher Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations. See alsoChapter 10.

    Central Intelligence Agency (CIA): Independent federal agency created at the beginning of the Cold War and charged with gathering and providing national security intelligence to senior U.S. foreign policymakers. President Harry S. Truman (1945–1953) signed the National Security Act of 1947, officially establishing the agency. The National Security Act charged the CIA with coordinating the nation's intelligence activities and correlating, evaluating, and disseminating intelligence affecting national security. The agency is organized into four basic parts: the National Clandestine Service, the Directorate of Intelligence, the Directorate of Science & Technology, and the Directorate of Support. Together, these groups carry out the intelligence cycle, the process of collecting, analyzing, and distributing intelligence information about foreign governments, corporations, and individuals to U.S. government officials. The director of the agency is nominated by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate and serves to manage the CIA's operations, personnel, and budget. In addition, the director has several staffs who deal with public affairs, human resources, protocol, congressional affairs, and legal issues. CIA operations are usually secret and sometimes create scandals when revealed; an example of this is President Richard M. Nixon's (1969–1974) pressuring the agency to cover up ex-agents’ break-in at the Democratic Party's headquarters in 1972. On December 17, 2004, President George W. Bush (2001–2009) signed the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act, which restructured the intelligence community by abolishing the positions of director of central intelligence and deputy director of central intelligence. In their stead, the act created the positions of the director of the Central Intelligence Agency and director of National Intelligence (DNI), which oversee the Intelligence Community and the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). See alsoChapter 18.

    Central powers: Name given to the nations of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, and Bulgaria, who fought against the Allies—Great Britain, France, Italy, the United States, and others—during World War I (1914–1918). See alsoChapter 8.

    Citizen Genêt Affair: A 1793 incident in which Edmond Charles Genêt, the recently appointed ambassador of the new French Republic (proclaimed after the 1789 French Revolution), failed to present his credentials to President George Washington (1789–1797) in Philadelphia, then the nation's capital. Genêt landed instead at Charleston, South Carolina, where he was greeted with great enthusiasm. He ignored Washington's recently issued Proclamation of Neutrality, which declared the United States to be at peace with Great Britain and France and warned the citizenry to perform no hostile acts against either nation. Genêt persuaded Americans to aid the French cause and hired American ships to serve as privateers to attack British ships. Because Spain was also fighting against France, he encouraged frontier leaders to attack the Spanish in Louisiana and Florida. His actions were a flagrant violation of U.S. neutrality. When Genêt finally arrived in Philadelphia, Washington received him with cold formality and refused his requests for aid. Undaunted by the president's rebuff, Genêt continued to appeal to the American people to help the French. Washington, now thoroughly provoked, asked the French government to recall its irresponsible envoy. See alsoChapter 1.

    Cold War: The sharp tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union and their allies from about 1946 until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, which entailed diplomatic, ideological, and indirect military confrontations. Joseph Stalin (the leader of the Soviet Union from 1924 to 1953) believed it impossible for his Communist nation to exist side by side with the imperialist West. The Soviet Union, and later the People's Republic of China, precipitated crises around the globe in central Europe, Asia, and Africa. The issue facing the West became how to contain and prevent the spread of communism and a major war. Thus there began a cold war between the two sides which was characterized by a nuclear arms race and proxy wars. See alsoChapters 17, 20, and 24.

    communism: A political and economic system in which communal property is owned by the state and the state controls the economy, often through a single political party such as the Communist Party of the (former) Soviet Union. The Marxist-Leninist version of communism that was practiced in the Soviet Union in the twentieth century called for the abolition of class structures and advocated the overthrow of the capitalist system, based on private ownership, by the proletariat. See alsoChapter 18.

    Communist Party: Political organization that advocates the principles of communism through a Communist form of government. Hundreds of Communist parties exist throughout the world; in some nations, such as the People's Republic of China, Cuba, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Communist Party maintains absolute control of the state, including the rights of its citizens. In the United States, the Communist Party is a minor third party. See alsoChapters 16 and 17.

    containment: U.S. foreign policy designed to prevent the Soviet Union and its allies from spreading communism to other nations. In July 1947, in an anonymous article, State Department official George F. Kennan expressed the basic and guiding idea behind American activity in the Cold War. He wrote, “The main element of any United States policy toward the Soviet Union must be that of long-term patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies….” See alsoChapter 17.

    Convention of 1800: Treaty reached between the United States and France which abrogated all earlier treaties between the two nations, thus formally releasing the United States from its defensive alliance with the French Republic. The Convention also ended the Quasi War with France (which occurred between 1798 and 1800), restoring peace between the two nations. See alsoChapter 1.

    covert aid: Military or political assistance given to a nation, rebel group, or other faction in such a way that the parties giving the aid may be known, but their responsibility cannot be proved. See alsoChapter 38.

    cowboy diplomacy: Term used derisively by critics of U.S. policy, which they view as heavy-handed and which may include the use of threats, intimidation, or direct military action. The term was used first to describe the big stick policies of Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909); more recently, critics have used the term in reference to the policies of Ronald Reagan (1981–1989) and George W. Bush (2001–2009). See alsoChapters 7 and 28.

    Cuban Missile Crisis: Critical confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union precipitated when the Soviets began establishing missile bases in Cuba in 1962; also the development that is generally considered the incident that almost moved the Cold War into a nuclear conflict. The Soviets had been sending Cuba military supplies and weapons, but the installation of missiles that could be launched against the United States, threatening its security and military superiority, brought dramatic American reaction. President John F. Kennedy (1961–1963) immediately declared a quarantine against all arms shipments to Cuba and sent naval and air units to intercept incoming Soviet vessels. He announced that the launching of a missile attack against any nation in the Western Hemisphere would bring “full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.” The United States and the Soviet Union stood at the brink of war. After several tense days, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev (in power 1953–1964) declared that “in the interest of peace,” the Soviet Union would destroy its missile sites in Cuba and withdraw its missiles. Kennedy praised Khrushchev's “statesmanlike decision” and agreed not to invade Cuba, as well as to remove certain types of missiles from Europe and Turkey. See alsoChapter 20.

    D

    D-Day: June 6, 1944, the day the Allied invasion of Normandy (in France) began in an effort to liberate mainland Europe from Nazi occupation. Planning for the operation, code-named “Overlord,” began two years in advance under the direction of Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Allied Supreme Commander. Before the D-Day landings, Allied planes heavily bombed the French region and smashed German lines of communication all the way to Paris. A fleet of more than 4,500 warships, freighters, and other landing craft carried the initial force of 176,000 American, British, and Canadian troops. Allied forces recaptured Paris in August 1944, and, aiming at the heart of Germany, slowly but steadily advanced toward Berlin, the German capital. See alsoChapters 14 and 15.

    Demilitarized Zone (DMZ): Buffer area separating two enemy nations in which soldiers, weapons, and military installations are forbidden. In the twentieth century, one well-known DMZ was at the seventeenth parallel, which separated North Vietnam from South Vietnam. Also, since the 1953 armistice ending the Korean War (1950–1953), the DMZ along the thirty-eighth parallel has separated North Korea from South Korea. See alsoChapter 19.

    Department of Homeland Security (DHS): Created in 2003, the cabinet department charged with preventing terrorist attacks on American soil. The department's establishment was a direct result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Proposed by President George W. Bush (2001–2009) in June 2002, Congress approved the new department later that year, and it began operation in January 2003. The DHS coordinates various security functions that were handled previously by several different federal departments and agencies. In addition to working to prevent terrorist attacks within the United States, the DHS is responsible for coordinating information about terrorist threats and reviewing the vulnerability of the nation's infrastructure to possible attack. The department also enforces trade and immigration laws and protects against financial crimes, such as preventing counterfeiting of the nation's money. See alsoChapter 39.

    Department of State, United States: The oldest executive department of the U.S. government, established in 1781 under the Articles of Confederation as the Department of Foreign Affairs. After the ratification of the Constitution in 1788, the department was reorganized as the Department of State, and President George Washington (1789–1797) appointed Thomas Jefferson the first secretary of state. The secretary of state is the president's official adviser on foreign affairs and international diplomacy and is the highest ranking member of the cabinet. The secretary is in charge of State Department operations and is responsible for the overall direction, coordination, and supervision of American foreign policy. See alsoChapters 16 and 17. détente: A French term that literally means a “relaxation of tension.” It was used to describe the easing of Cold War tensions among the United States, the Soviet Union, and the People's Republic of China in the 1970s under President Richard M. Nixon (1969–1974) and President Gerald R. Ford (1974–1977). See alsoChapter 25.

    disarmament: The policy and process of limiting, reducing, or destroying weapons. Disarmament may refer to the elimination of one type of weapon, such as nuclear warheads; complete disarmament refers to the removal of all weaponry, including conventional arms. States or groups may be compelled to disarm or negotiate disarmament through agreements. See alsoChapters 11, 20, and 39.

    Dollar Diplomacy: An American policy, often associated with President William Howard Taft (1909–1913), which used the economic power of the United States to further the nation's business and political interests in Latin America and East Asia. The term, coined by President Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909), involved American banks providing loans to foreign nations, thus increasing U.S. leverage within those nations. Taft, as well as his secretary of state, Philander C. Knox, believed that a major goal of foreign policy was political and economic stability abroad, which in turn would benefit American business interests. For example, dollar diplomacy was in evidence during the construction of the Panama Canal, the protection of which was behind many American interventions in the early twentieth century. See alsoChapter 7.

    domino theory: The concept, popular from the 1950s to the 1980s, that if one crucial nation in an area fell under Communist control, neighboring states would do so as well, falling like dominos. The theory, first cited by President Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961), was behind the American policy of containment during the Cold War and was used to justify American intervention around the globe. See alsoChapter 23.

    E

    embargo: A governmental ban or prohibition of trade with a particular nation, intended to isolate and weaken the other nation. Examples include the Arab oil embargo of 1973 against nations that supported Israel in the Yom Kippur War and the American embargo against exports to Cuba that has been in effect since 1960. See alsoChapters 1 and 26.

    embassy: The building that houses an ambassador and staff, most often located in the nation's capital; also, the diplomatic mission to a nation, usually permanent in nature. Embassies (the building and grounds) do not enjoy full extraterritorial status and are not sovereign territory of the represented state; the premises of diplomatic missions remain under the jurisdiction of the host state while enjoying special privileges, such as immunity from most local laws, by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961). Diplomats themselves retain full diplomatic immunity, and the host country may not enter the premises of the mission without permission of the represented country. See alsoChapter 27.

    envoy: A representative of a sovereign government, often with a rank below that of an ambassador, sent on a special diplomatic mission. See alsoChapter 1.

    European Union (EU): A cooperative league of twenty-seven (as of 2012) European member states whose goals include promoting economic growth, removing trade and immigration barriers, and maintaining peace. The roots of the EU go back to the 1949 Council of Europe, an agreement among Western European nations to cooperate further among themselves. Starting with six original members, the organization officially became the European Union in 1992, when the founding nations signed the Treaty of Maastricht. EU citizens may travel between member nations without a passport or other documentation. The organization has eliminated trade barriers among member nations and, in 2002, introduced the euro as a unit of common currency (although some member nations have opted not to use the euro). In late March 2003, troops from EU nations took over NATO's peacekeeping activities in the Balkan Peninsula. See alsoChapter 31.

    expansionism: A national policy to extend control over additional territory, either peacefully or through military aggression. The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 is an example of peaceful expansionism; the policies of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy in the 1930s are examples of militaristic expansionism. See alsoChapter 2.

    F

    failed states: Nations that are perceived to have fallen far short of providing some of the basic conditions and responsibilities of a sovereign government. Among the characteristics of failed states are the loss of physical control of its territory, the erosion of legitimate authority to make decisions, the inability to provide minimal public services, and the inability to interact with other states in the international community. In addition, usually, failed states are plagued by widespread corruption and criminal activity, refugees, and sharp economic decline. Political observers differ in determining whether a nation is a failed state; however, most consider Somalia, Chad, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Afghanistan, and Haiti to be failed states. See alsoChapters 27, 34, and 35.

    fascism: Radical type of government that promotes extreme nationalism and promises to improve the nation, usually through military conquest. Political and economic power are in the hands of a dictator or a powerful central government; however, unlike communism or socialism, the government does not legally control ownership of all property. In World War II (1939–1945), fascist regimes arose in Mussolini's Italy, Hitler's Germany, and Imperial Japan. See alsoChapter 11.

    Fascist Party: Founded in 1919, a political party that supports fascism, a national dictatorial movement that emphasizes the state over the individual and is opposed to both communism and democracy. Italy's Fascist Party rose in the 1920s under Benito Mussolini (in power 1922–1943). See alsoChapter 14.

    Federalists: Government leaders and other individuals who supported ratification of the proposed Constitution of the United States between 1787 and 1789. The Federalist Papers are documents that lay out the reasons for their support. Those opposed to the ratification of the Constitution were known as Antifederalists. Later, in the 1790s, when the first political parties emerged, the Federalist Party founded by Alexander Hamilton controlled the new government during the administrations of presidents George Washington (1789–1797) and John Adams (17971801). In opposition to the Federalist Party, the Democratic-Republican Party was founded by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Note, however, that the Federalists who supported the ratification of the Constitution are not necessarily synonymous with the members of the Federalist Party. For example, James Madison, known as “the Father of the Constitution,” was a strong ratification supporter; later, he became a staunch Democratic-Republican. See alsoChapter 1.

    First Continental Congress: First governing body of the thirteen united colonies, established to present a single voice of opposition to Great Britain's taxation policies, especially the Coercive Acts (1774), which were passed in response to the Boston Tea Party (1773). Delegates from all the colonies except Georgia attended the First Continental Congress, which assembled in Philadelphia on September 5, 1774. The congress endorsed the Suffolk Resolves, which declared that the Coercive Acts were not to be obeyed, that Massachusetts collect taxes but withhold them from the royal governor until the Coercive Acts were repealed, and that strict economic sanctions be put into effect against Britain. The resolves also called for the people to arms themselves and form militias, and they pledged that all the colonies would support Massachusetts if attacked. To implement the economic sanctions, the congress adopted the Continental Association, a strict and extremely successful boycott against Britain which included imports and exports. In response, many British merchants angrily petitioned Parliament to repeal the Coercive Acts. British leaders, however, viewed the boycott as a symbol of rebellion for which the colonists must be punished. Tensions continued to rise between Great Britain and the colonies, leading to the battles of Lexington and Concord (1775). See alsoChapter 1.

    Five Power Treaty: Agreement among the United States, Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan to limit naval armaments. Also known as the Washington Naval Treaty, it was negotiated in Washington, D.C., between November 1921 and February 1922. An attempt to limit the naval arms race that began after World War I (1914–1918), the treaty enjoyed limited success; at first, the signatories limited new naval construction and decommissioned many vessels, but by 1936, Japan declared that it would no longer abide by the treaty's terms. See alsoChapter 11.

    foreign minister: A member of the cabinet who helps form foreign policy for a sovereign head of state. In the United States, this position is occupied by the secretary of state; the position in other nations may be known as the minister of foreign affairs, minister for external affairs, or the minister of foreign relations. See alsoChapter 11.

    Fourteen Points: Promulgated by President Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921) in January 1918, a set of principles designed to serve as a blueprint for peace at the end of World War I (1914–1918). In his ambitious Fourteen Points, Wilson called for an end to secret diplomacy, the removal of economic barriers to trade, freedom of the seas, reduction of armaments, and the adjustment of colonial claims. He also pressed for the German evacuation of Russian, Belgian, Serbian, and Romanian territories; the German return of the Alsace-Lorraine to France; adjustment of the Italian frontier; self-determination for all national groups; and the recreation of an independent Poland. His final point advocated the formation of “a general association of nations” to guarantee the “political independence and territorial integrity of great and small states alike.” Realization of this proposal was Wilson's highest goal during the Paris Peace Conference, which resulted in the 1919 Treaty of Versailles; however, following strong opposition from isolationists in the U.S. Senate, the treaty failed to be ratified. See alsoChapters 9 and 10.

    free trade: A policy of international commerce in which merchants are permitted to trade with minimal interference from their respective governments. For example, The North American Free Trade agreement (NAFTA) is a trilateral agreement among the United States, Canada, and Mexico which seeks to remove barriers to commerce; it went into effect on January 1, 1994. Another massive free trade bloc is the European Union (EU), which, as of 2012, includes twenty-seven members and has taken on political, social, and diplomatic functions. The EU pursues free trade among its members, but not with outsiders. See alsoChapters 31 and 34.

    G

    GATT: Signed in 1947, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade was a multilateral accord designed to regulate trade, and especially to reduce tariffs, among more than one hundred countries. According to the preamble of the founding document, the purpose of the GATT was the “substantial reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers and the elimination of preferences, on a reciprocal and mutually advantageous basis.” In 1995, GATT was superseded by the World Trade Organization (WTO). See alsoChapters 16 and 34.

    Geneva Conventions: Formulated in international meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, a series of four treaties and three protocols of international law that require the humanitarian treatment of civilians in a war zone, as well as the same treatment for the sick, wounded, and prisoners of war (POWs). The First Geneva Convention, held in 1864, laid the foundations of humanitarian law whereby participants agreed to universal written rules to protect the victims of conflicts; the obligation to extend care without discrimination to wounded and sick military personnel; and respect for and the marking of medical personnel, vehicles, and other equipment using a red cross on a white background. In 1906, additional agreements to govern the treatment of sick, wounded, or shipwrecked armed forces at sea were reached and signed in The Hague in the Netherlands. The third Geneva Convention, held in 1929, addressed the treatment of prisoners of war, calling also for the release and repatriation of POWs at the end of hostilities. The Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) required the humanitarian treatment of civilians in a war zone and outlawed total war, in addition to expanding upon earlier protections. The singular term Geneva Convention is used often to refer to the 1949 agreements.

    Three subsequent protocols have amended the 1949 agreements. Protocol I, adopted in 1977, calls for increased protections of civilians in international conflicts, including outlawing indiscriminate attacks on civilian populations and the destruction of food, water, and other items needed for survival. It also forbids conscription of children under the age of fifteen but allows for voluntary participation by persons under that age. Protocol II, also adopted in 1977, addresses issues of internal conflicts (as opposed to international conflicts), and, in deference to the sovereignty of national governments, it is more limited in scope. It requires that persons taking no active part in hostilities should be treated humanely, including military personnel who are no longer active as a result of sickness, injury, or detention. Approved in 2005, Protocol III added the Red Crystal as an emblem to be used by medical or religious personnel. This symbol may be used in place of the Red Cross. International law prohibits the misuse of these emblems. See alsoChapter 29.

    genocide: Systematic murder of a national, racial, religious, political, or ethnic group with the intent of annihilating that group. The term genocide was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-Jewish legal scholar. In his Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in 1944, Lemkin includes an extensive legal analysis of German rule in countries occupied by Nazi Germany during World War II (1939–1945), along with a definition of genocide: “the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group.” Lemkin's concept of genocide as an offense against international law was widely accepted by the international community. It became one of the legal bases of the Nuremberg Trials, during which twenty-four Nazi leaders were charged with conducting “deliberate and systematic genocide—namely, the extermination of racial and national groups….” Following the Holocaust, the extermination of more than six million European Jews by the Nazis, Lemkin pushed for international laws to define and forbid genocide. In 1946, the first session of the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution that affirmed that genocide was a crime under international law but did not provide a legal definition of the crime. Then, in 1948, the UN General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which, in Article 2, legally defines the crime as: “… any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) killing members of the group; (b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; and (e) forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.” Horrific incidents of genocide have occurred recently in Rwanda, the former Yugoslavia, and Darfur in Sudan. See alsoChapter 30.

    Gentlemen's Agreement (1907): An informal agreement between the United States and the Japanese Empire which limited immigration from Japan and reversed the segregation of Japanese schoolchildren in San Francisco, California. In 1906 and 1907, diplomatic relations between the United States and Japan grew strained when San Francisco attempted to segregate Japanese children in its schools. At this time, American public opinion, especially in California, strongly opposed further Japanese emigration to the United States. The Empire of Japan looked upon this development as an insult and demanded equal treatment as a world power, especially after its 1905 victory over Russia. President Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909) brought pressure to stop the segregation of schoolchildren and obtained from Japan an agreement to end the emigration of Japanese agricultural workers. See alsoChapter 7.

    Gilded Age: Lasting roughly from the end of the Civil War (1861–1865) to about 1900, a period of rapid change and economic growth in the United States. The term Gilded Age was coined by Mark Twain and Charles Dudley Warner in their book, The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today (1873). The era was characterized by new inventions, rapid industrialization, the growth of big business, the accumulation of wealth by entrepreneurs and industrialists, and ostentatious displays of prosperity by the rich. At the same time, the rate of urbanization increased significantly, city living conditions worsened, and workers toiled long hours under unsafe and often filthy conditions. The unionization of workers also increased during this time. By the beginning of the twentieth century, the nation had become the world's leading industrial power, surpassing Great Britain and Germany. The economic and social ills of this era led to the rise of the Progressive Era. See alsoChapter 4.

    glasnost: Social policy of free and open discussion of economic and political problems initiated by Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev (in power 1985 to 1991) in the late 1980s in an attempt to save the Soviet Union from collapse. The then new policy of political and cultural openness produced unintended consequences. Gorbachev had weakened the nation's system of internal political repression, greatly limiting the ability of the central Communist government to impose its will on the Soviet Union's fifteen member republics. Ultimately, with an end to seventy-five years of single-party rule by the Communist Party, glasnost was a determining factor leading to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991. See alsoChapter 29.

    globalization: The effect produced when regional economies, societies, and cultural traditions become globally interconnected through a vast system of complex interactions, ranging from formal treaties to international investments and social networking. The foundation of globalization is economic expansion and connectivity; the goal is to create a single, universal market for goods and services, and this economic activity then spills over into the environment, culture, political systems, economic development, and physical well-being in societies worldwide. In the years since World War II (1939–1945), and especially during the past two decades, many governments have adopted free-market economic systems, thus greatly increasing their own productive potential and creating new opportunities for international trade and investment. In addition, governments have negotiated remarkable reductions of trade barriers and established international agreements, such as NAFTA and the EU, to promote globalized trade in goods, services, and investment. Technology has been the other major force in globalization. Advances in information science have given consumers, investors, and businesses valuable new tools for identifying and pursuing economic opportunities, including faster and more informed analyses of economic trends around the world, easy transfers of assets, and collaboration with worldwide partners. Still, globalization remains controversial, with proponents arguing that it allows poor countries to develop economically and opponents claiming that the creation of an unregulated international free market has benefited multinational corporations in the West at the expense of local enterprises, local cultures, and common citizens. See alsoChapter 34.

    Good Neighbor Policy: Embraced by President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945), an essentially successful U.S. foreign policy indicating that the United States would cooperate, rather than forcibly intervene, in the affairs of Latin American nations. The policy aimed to promote friendly relations and mutual defense arrangements among the nations of the Western Hemisphere. After World War I (1914–1918), American public opinion turned against imperialism and intervention in Latin America. In 1931, President Herbert Hoover (1929–1933) did not intervene when several Latin American countries filed to pay their debts, and in 1932, he withdrew U.S. marines from Nicaragua. Under Roosevelt, relations grew friendlier, and Secretary of State Cordell Hull arranged reciprocal tariff reductions in Latin America. In 1936, Roosevelt withdrew the last American marines from Haiti, and in that same year, he made a triumphal tour of Latin America. Cooperation from Latin American neighbors helped the United States win World War II (1939–1945). See alsoChapter 12.

    Great Depression: The worldwide economic collapse in the 1930s. In the United States, the Great Depression began with the stock market crash of October 29, 1929, and ended with World War II (1939–1945). During the Depression, trade, income, prices, profits, and tax revenues declined sharply; almost all nations of the world were affected. President Franklin D. Roosevelt's (1933–1945) New Deal was designed to pull the United States out of the Depression. Most countries set up relief programs to aid their citizenry and many endured some sort of political upheaval. In some nations, desperate citizens turned toward nationalist demagogues, the most infamous being Adolf Hitler (in power 1933–1945), setting the stage for World War II (1939–1945). See alsoChapters 12 and 13.

    Guantánamo: U.S. detention facility in southeastern Cuba. The southern portion of Guantánamo Bay has been under U.S. control since the 1903 Cuban-American Treaty, which granted the United States a perpetual lease of the area. Since then, the United States has operated a naval base there, nicknamed “Gitmo,” which covers about forty-five square miles (about 116 square kilometers). The facility, established in 2002 by the administration of George W. Bush (2001–2009), detains captured al-Qaeda personnel, as well as detainees from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Operated by the U.S. military under the Joint Task Force Guantánamo, the detention facility has come under severe criticism from human rights groups and much of the international community because of allegations of torture and other prisoner abuses, which the U.S. government denies. Although President Barack Obama (2009–) signed an order on January 22, 2009, to suspend the proceedings at Guantánamo and to have the controversial facility shut down within the year, the U.S. Senate would not support the administration. Instead, the Senate passed an amendment to the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2009 (by a 90–6 vote) to block funds needed for the transfer or release of prisoners held at the detention camp. On January 7, 2011, President Obama signed the 2011 Defense Authorization Bill, which contains provisions preventing the transfer of Guantánamo prisoners to the mainland or to other foreign countries, thus effectively stopping the closure of the camp. However, the president strongly objected to many of the bill's provisions and stated that he would work with Congress to rectify the measure. As of February 2011, more than 150 detainees remained at Guantánamo. See alsoChapter 35.

    Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (1964): Authorization passed by a joint session of Congress that granted President Lyndon B. Johnson (1963–1969) as commander in chief, almost unlimited power to conduct the war in Vietnam and to repel or prevent any future attacks against the U.S. military. On August 2, 1964, North Vietnamese gunboats allegedly attacked a U.S. destroyer, the USS Maddox, in the Gulf of Tonkin off the coast of North Vietnam, and two days later, another U.S. ship was supposedly attacked. In response, President Johnson ordered retaliatory attacks on North Vietnamese coastal bases. On August 7, Congress authorized the president to take “all necessary steps, including the use of armed forces” to assist any nation that requested aid in defense of its freedom under the provisions of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty. During fall 1964, Johnson sent larger and larger numbers of troops and equipment to help repel the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong. By mid-1966, the number of U.S. troops had grown to about 350,000. Seeking to restore limits on presidential authority to engage American forces without a formal declaration of war, the Resolution was repealed in 1971, and Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in 1973, over the veto of President Richard M. Nixon (1969–1974), who also had used the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution to escalate U.S. involvement in Vietnam. The War Powers Resolution, which is still in effect, requires the president to consult with Congress regarding decisions that send U.S. forces into hostilities or imminent hostilities.

    In 2005, a declassified National Security Agency study concluded that the Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese Navy on August 2, but there may not have been any North Vietnamese Naval vessels present on August 4. The report stated, “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night… In truth, Hanoi's navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2.” See alsoChapter 23.

    Gulf War:See Persian Gulf War.

    H

    Hay-Pauncefote Treaty (1901): Agreement between the United States and Great Britain, which was negotiated by U.S. Secretary of State John Hay and the British ambassador to the United States, Lord Pauncefote. Under the terms of the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty, Britain agreed to give the United States the right to build a canal across Panama, if the canal was to be open to all nations at equal charges. The Hay-Pauncefote Treaty negated the 1850 Clayton-Bulwer Treaty, in which both nations renounced building a canal under the control of one nation. See alsoChapter 7.

    Holocaust: The systematic, state-sponsored genocide of more than six million European Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. The term holocaust comes from the Greek, meaning “sacrifice by fire.” In 1933, when the Nazi Party came to power, the Jewish population of Europe stood at more than nine million. By 1945, the Nazis and their collaborators had killed nearly two out of every three European Jews as part of Adolph Hitler's so-called “Final Solution.” With organized executions and mass exterminations, Nazi leaders also targeted religious dissenters, the disabled, gypsies, and some Slavic peoples. See alsoChapter 14.

    House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC): From 1938 to 1975, powerful but controversial committee of the United States House of Representatives, organized to investigate suspected disloyalty and subversive activities on the part of private citizens, public employees, and organizations suspected of having Communist ties. Through its power to subpoena witnesses and hold people in contempt of Congress, HUAC often pressured witnesses who testified to surrender names and other information that could lead to the apprehension of communists and Communist sympathizers. Most Americans agreed, especially after World War II (1939–1945) and with the growing fear of communism, that the U.S. government should expect that its secrets, particularly those of a military and diplomatic nature, were to be guarded closely. However, there was widespread disagreement over the necessity or desirability for limitations on freedom of speech and action.

    In 1947, on President Harry S. Truman's (1945–1953) order, loyalty boards investigated all federal employees. Of the three million employees, about two hundred were dismissed, some on flimsy evidence, and about two thousand resigned. New revelations of actual or alleged Soviet spying along with Communist successes in Europe and Asia accentuated the concern of many people. In 1948, a former State Department official, Alger Hiss, was accused of having given State Department secrets to the Soviet Union in 1938 and 1939. During dramatic HUAC hearings, Hiss was convicted of perjury. Significantly, the accusatory interrogation employed by HUAC served as the model upon which the notorious Senator Joseph McCarthy (R-WI) would conduct his controversial investigative hearings in the early 1950s. Following Senator McCarthy's censure in late 1954, however, and his subsequent departure from the Senate, the American public grew increasingly wary of the outrageous “redbaiting” techniques employed by the HUAC, which was finally abolished in 1975. See alsoChapter 17.

    human rights: The basic political, economic, and social rights and freedoms to which all people are entitled. The modern concept of human rights can be traced to the aftermath of World War II (1939–1945) and the subsequent founding of the United Nations (UN). In 1948, the UN adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; although the declaration was a nonbinding UN resolution, some people hold that it carries the force of international law. The declaration was framed by members of the Human Rights Commission, which was chaired by former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt. Of the thirty articles, Articles 1 through 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights state: “Article 1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act toward one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4. No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6. Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.” Beginning with the administration of President Jimmy Carter (1977–1981), the acceptance of human rights stands as a keystone of American foreign policy. See alsoChapter 34.

    I

    immigration and foreign policy: The process of entering and settling in another country or area and the impact of such movement upon international relations. Other than the Native Americans, all people in the United States are immigrants or are descended from immigrants. Since the mid-nineteenth century and earlier, immigration, along with its impact on the nation, has been considered a foreign-policy issue. In the early years of the Republic, fewer than eight thousand people a year migrated to the United States, but after 1820, immigration gradually increased. From 1850 to 1930, the foreign-born population of the United States increased from 2.2 million to 14.2 million. During this era, few restraints on immigration existed as the rapidly expanding industrialized economy demanded more and more cheap labor.

    Two notable exceptions to the open immigration policy were the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and President Theodore Roosevelt's (1901–1909) Gentlemen's Agreement (1907) with Japan. Both of these measures reflected Americans’ deep mistrust of nonwhite immigrants. Nonetheless, the highest percentage of foreign-born people in the United States was found in this period, peaking in 1890 at 14.7 percent.

    Between 1880 and 1924, more than twenty-five million Europeans migrated to the United States. Following this period, immigration fell after Congress passed the Immigration Act of 1924, which favored European source countries that had already sent many migrants to the United States. This law reflected Americans’ anti-immigration views of the time.

    Immigration patterns of the 1930s were dominated by the Great Depression, and, in the early 1930s, more people emigrated from the United States than immigrated to it; immigration continued to fall throughout the 1940s and 1950s but increased again afterwards.

    The Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965 (which abolished the Immigration Act of 1924) removed immigration quotas and legal immigration to the United States surged, especially from nations in Asia and Latin America. By the 1980s, only 11 percent of new U.S. immigrants were European. The 1990 Immigration Act (IMMACT) modified and expanded the 1965 act; it significantly increased the total immigration limit to 700,000. After 2000, immigrants to the United States numbered about one million per year. Also, despite tougher border scrutiny after the September 11, 2001, attacks, nearly eight million immigrants came to the United States between 2000 and 2005—more than in any other five-year period in the nation's history. Almost half entered illegally. Mexico has been the leading source of new U.S. residents for more than two decades, and, since 1998, China, India, and the Philippines have been among the top four countries sending immigrants every year.

    In 1990, President William J. Clinton (1989–2001) appointed the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, led by Barbara Jordan, which lasted until 1997. The commission made the most thorough examination of the impact of U.S. immigration policies on American life of any federal commission to date. One key recommendation called for reducing legal immigration to about 550,000 people a year. The commission's recommendations have yet to be implemented, however. Immigration policies and their effects on the nation remain extremely controversial issues and they are likely to remain so for years to come, thereby affecting the nation's foreign policy and relations with the rest of the world. See alsoChapters 2, 4, and 31.

    imperialism: An expansionist policy of a stronger state's imposing political and economic control on weaker foreign colonies and possessions. The concept of American imperialism arose after the Spanish-American War (1898) and often refers to the military, economic, social, and cultural influences of the United States. The term was first widely applied to U.S. foreign policy by the American Anti-Imperialist League, founded in 1898 to oppose the Spanish-American War and the subsequent postwar military occupation of the Philippines. See alsoChapters 6 and 7.

    impressment: Seizing by force, by a person or government; first used in U.S. history to describe the British practice of forcibly taking sailors from American ships. The impressment issue grew to crisis proportions during the wars with France (1793–1815), when Britain needed all the men that could be found and was careless about whom they impressed, often taking any able-bodied English-speaking sailor. The American government tried to help its sailors by providing them with documents attesting to their American citizenship, but the British largely ignored these papers. Impressment was a major issue that contributed to the U.S. declaration of war against Great Britain in 1812. The Treaty of Ghent (1814), which ended the War of 1812 (1812–1814), failed to address the issue of impressment. The British stopped the practice in 1814, after the defeat of the French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. See alsoChapter 1.

    international law: A body of law—treaties, customs, resolutions, conventions, principles of law, and declarations of international organizations—that governs the conduct of independent nations in their relations with one another. Two basic categories of international law exist, public and private. Public international law focuses on governing relationships between or among different nations or between a nation and persons from another country. Private international law generally deals with individual concerns, such as civil or human rights issues, not only between a government and its own citizens but also in how its citizens are treated by other nations. The concept of international law has existed since the Middle Ages; in the mid-nineteenth century, international law became increasingly codified with the international acceptance of various agreements such as the Geneva Conventions. In the mid-twentieth century, the League of Nations was replaced by the United Nations, which today has become the center of researching and applying international law. Article 13 of the UN Charter obligates the General Assembly to initiate studies and make recommendations to encourage the development of international law and its codification. See alsoChapter 16.

    International Monetary Fund (IMF): An organization of 187 member countries that work to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world. The IMF was conceived in July 1944, when representatives of forty-five countries meeting in the picturesque town of Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, agreed on a framework for worldwide economic cooperation that was to be established after World War II (1939–1945). These economic leaders believed that such a plan was necessary to avoid a repetition of the catastrophic economic policies that had contributed to the Great Depression and to assist with the rebuilding of the international economy after the war. The IMF came into formal existence in December 1945, when its first twenty-nine-member countries signed the Articles of Agreement. It began operations on March 1, 1947, functioning as a bank from which members could borrow money. Later that year, France became the first country to borrow from the IMF. Since its creation, the IMF has supervised the international monetary system to ensure exchange rate stability; it therefore encourages members to eliminate exchange restrictions that hinder trade. Since the worldwide economic downturn in 2008, the IMF has lent billions of dollars to countries to help boost the global economy that suffered from the deepest economic crisis since the Great Depression. See alsoChapter 16.

    internationalism: A policy that advocates strong relations among nations, including economic and political cooperation, to the benefit of all involved. Since its involvement in World War II (1939–1945), before which its foreign policy was isolationist, the United States has been unabashedly internationalist in its policy and world view. As one of two superpowers after World War II, and as the world's sole superpower since the end of the cold war, the United States has worked to assist democratic movements, arbitrate disputes between nations, foster free trade, and defend human rights. See alsoChapters 15 and 16.

    Iraq War: U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, which began on March 20, 2003, to overthrow Saddam Hussein. Based on mistaken intelligence that Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), prior to the war, President George W. Bush (2001–2009) and his administration had argued that the Iraqi dictator posed a serious threat to the United States and other nations. However, after the capitulation of Hussein's government, coalition forces found no WMDs, revealing that the intelligence information used to justify the invasion was faulty.

    After the combat phase of the controversial invasion, coalition forces and the UN established a provisional government to rule Iraq until a democratic government could be established, and after the fall of Hussein's dictatorship, racial and religious tensions that had smoldered for decades exploded in the streets as widespread looting and violence erupted. Guerrilla forces, often called the insurgency, attacked civilians and soldiers alike.

    Violence raged through 2003 and increased during 2004, with al-Qaeda-affiliated Abu Musab al-Zarqawi helping to drive the insurgency. In January 2005, the Iraqis elected the Iraqi Transitional Government to draft a permanent constitution. Although some violence and a widespread Sunni boycott marred the event, most of the eligible Kurd and Shia populace participated in the election. In a referendum held on October 15, 2005, a new Iraqi constitution was ratified; an Iraqi national assembly was elected in December, with participation from the Sunnis as well as the Kurds and Shia. Despite the slow steps toward self-government, insurgent attacks increased through 2005, and conditions in Iraq continued to deteriorate as bombings and attacks between Sunni and Shia sects raged throughout the following year. A December 18 Pentagon report found that insurgent attacks were averaging about 960 per week. In January 2007, President Bush proposed sending 21,500 more troops to combat the insurgency, as well as a job program for Iraqis, more reconstruction proposals, and $1.2 billion for these programs. By mid-2008, violence declined, and most of the American people called for the complete withdrawal of U.S. military force in Iraq. On December 4, 2008, the Iraqi government approved the U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement. It established that U.S. combat forces would withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and that all U.S. forces would be completely out of Iraq by December 31, 2011. Since 2003, more than 5,000 American troops have died in Iraq. On February 27, 2009, President Barack Obama (2009–) announced at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina that the U.S. combat mission in Iraq would end by August 31, 2010. The president added that a transitional force of up to 50,000 troops tasked with training the Iraqi Security Forces, conducting counterterrorism operations, and providing general support may remain until the end of 2011, when all U.S. military in fact left Iraq. See alsoChapters 35 and 40.

    iron curtain: Following World War II, term used by Winston Churchill to describe the political and economic division of Europe into western democracies and eastern communist bloc nations dominated by the Soviet Union. Although the term was coined in 1945 in a speech by Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, it is more closely associated with Churchill's 1946 speech in Fulton, Missouri, when he described the realities of Soviet policy: “From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic an iron curtain has descended across the Continent [of Europe]… I do not believe that Soviet Russia desires war. What they desire is the fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines.” The popularized phrase “behind the iron curtain” was used to describe nations under Soviet control for more than forty years. See alsoChapter 16.

    isolationism: Also known as noninterventionism, a foreign policy of political, economic, and cultural seclusion from alliances with other nations except to achieve specific short-term goals, such as winning a war. After World War I (1914–1918), American public opinion grew increasingly isolationist, a view that was reflected in the nation's elected officials. Thus, throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the United States rejected the League of Nations, negotiated treaties that promoted peace or outlawed war, and passed several neutrality acts that prevented or severely limited U.S. aid to warring nations. American isolationism ended on December 7, 1941, after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which brought the United States into World War II (1939–1945). See alsoChapter 11.

    J

    Jay Treaty (1794): Agreement reached between the United States and Great Britain which attempted to resolve several issues that remained after the signing of the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which ended the War for Independence (1775–1783). Under the terms of the Jay Treaty, the British agreed to abandon their posts in the Northwest Territory on or before June 1, 1796; permit American vessels of less than seventy tons to trade in the British West Indies; and grant some trading privileges in the British East Indies. However, the British did not promise to stop seizing the cargoes of American ships trading with France, and no provision of the treaty addressed the ongoing British impressment of American sailors on the high seas. Significantly, the British did agree that a number of other disagreements would be settled by arbitration, thus establishing the important precedent of using arbitration as a means of settling international disputes. See alsoChapter 1.

    jingoism: Extreme patriotism in the form of an aggressive foreign policy. The term is often used in reference to the foreign policy of President Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909). See alsoChapter 6.

    K

    Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928): Signed in Paris, a multilateral international agreement that attempted to ensure world peace by renouncing war. In 1928, the U.S. Secretary of State, Frank B. Kellogg, entered into negotiations with the foreign minister of France, Aristide Briand, to secure a treaty that would outlaw war as an “instrument of national policy” between their two nations. Jointly, the two leaders crafted a treaty for other nations to sign as well. Under the terms of the pact, the signing nations, sixty-two in total, agreed to settle differences peacefully. The Kellogg-Briand Pact, also known as the Pact of Paris, was only a declaration of intentions; most nations were quite willing to say they supported peace, especially because no means to enforce the pact were established. See alsoChapter 11.

    Korean War (1950–1953): Armed conflict between the Communist Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) and the democratic Republic of Korea (South Korea) and a proxy war between the Soviet Union and the United States. The war was the first military action taken to enforce the U.S. Cold War policy of containing communism.

    At the end of World War II (1939–1945), Korea was divided at the thirty-eighth parallel, with the north ruled by Soviet-backed communists and the south in the hands of a government favorable to and aided by the United States. Allied leaders had made the division with the intention that the two regions eventually would be joined to form one independent nation. In spite of repeated efforts to unite the country, Korea remained divided, as neither the Soviet Union nor the United States would consent to unification that gave the other dominance. Suddenly, on June 25, 1950, Soviet-armed North Korea invaded South Korea, swept down the peninsula, and almost wholly occupied it. President Harry S. Truman (1945–1953) immediately asked for action by the UN Security Council and promptly dispatched American military aid to South Korea in what he called a “police action,” intending to justify his sending troops without a declaration of war. The Security Council was able to act because the Soviet Union was temporarily boycotting it, and its representative was not present to veto the council's actions. The council condemned the attack and asked the North Koreans to withdraw behind the thirty-eighth parallel; it also called on member nations of the UN to send assistance to the South. When the North's army did not withdraw, troops from seventeen nations participated in driving them back, although most of the fighting was done by South Korean and U.S. troops, who together made up 90 percent of the UN's forces. With the backing of the UN, Truman appointed General Douglas MacArthur as commander in chief of all UN forces. The North Korean offensive continued through fall 1950, when UN troops pushed them back to the thirty-eighth parallel. Then a major question arose: Would the Chinese communists send troops to help the North Koreans? At first, the Chinese intervened with “volunteers” and aircraft, and then launched a massive counter offensive in November 1950, driving back UN forces. MacArthur wanted to bomb Chinese supply lines in the northern province of Manchuria, but Truman refused because of the likelihood that such an action would lead to full-scale war with China. By June 1951, both sides indicated their willingness to negotiate an end to hostilities, and negotiations dragged on for months. A permanent armistice finally was signed on July 27, 1953, establishing a demilitarized zone on either side of the thirty-eighth parallel. As a formal peace treaty was never signed, technically, state of war still exists between the two Koreas. See alsoChapter 17.

    Kyoto Protocol (2005): Linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, an international agreement that sets binding targets for thirty-seven industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in Kyoto, Japan, on December 11, 1997, and entered into force on February 16, 2005. Under its terms, countries’ actual emissions must be monitored, and precise records are required of the trades carried out. By the end of the first commitment period of the Protocol, in 2012, a new international framework will need to be negotiated and ratified if the controls on greenhouse gas emissions are to continue to be reduced. See alsoChapter 32.

    L

    League of Nations: A precursor of the United Nations, an international organization established by the Treaty of Versailles (1919) after the end of World War I (1914–1918). The idyllic vision of President Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921), the League's goal was to provide postwar order and maintain world peace. At the Paris Peace Conference, Wilson headed a committee to draft the plan for the League, a plan ultimately accepted as part of the Treaty of Versailles. Article X of the League's Covenant provided that member nations would “respect and preserve … against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing independence of all members….” The league largely failed in its goals, as the European powers joined, but the United States did not. Many members of the U.S. Senate, which must ratify treaties, were staunchly opposed to the League, especially Article X, believing that it would commit U.S. troops to foreign conflicts. Senate leaders proposed drastic changes to the plan, but Wilson refused to compromise. In 1919, and again in 1920, the Senate voted on the League and both times the vote fell short of the required two-thirds majority. See alsoChapters 9, 10, and 11.

    Lend-Lease Act (1941): Law proposed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945) and passed by Congress as a means to aid Great Britain's war effort in the fight against Nazi Germany prior to American entry into the conflict. Under the terms of the act, the United States would sell, transfer, lend, or lease war materials and supplies to any nation “whose defense was considered vital to the defense of the United States.” Any country would be aided in the way “the President deems satisfactory,” and repayment was to be made on the same terms. During spring and summer 1941, the United States provided assistance to Britain in multiple ways. Military officers of the two nations held talks on possible joint actions; American arms and planes went to Britain in ever-increasing quantities; the American navy began to patrol the North Atlantic to search for German submarines and report their presence to the British; and the United States turned over oil tankers to the British. Lend-lease was later extended to the Soviet Union, China, Australia, New Zealand, and other Allied nations. However, it also became an initial point of contention in the emerging Cold War when the Truman administration inadvertently cut off the aid to the USSR (and then restored it) in 1945. The total approximate amount of U.S. lend-lease during World War II was $50 billion. The act expired in September 1945, after the surrender by Japan. See alsoChapter 14.

    Lusitania: British ship torpedoed off the southern coast of Ireland on May 7, 1915, by a German submarine, resulting in the loss of nearly twelve hundred lives, including 128 Americans. In early 1915, Germany had declared it would sink on sight every enemy merchant ship in the war zone around Great Britain and had warned Americans to stay out of the area. President Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921) protested the German policy without result, and after the sinking of the Lusitania, issued three notes of vigorous protest, to no avail. Later, in August 1915, two more Americans were killed when a German submarine sunk the British liner Arabic, after which, Germany promised that liners would not be sunk without warning and consideration for the lives of noncombatants. However, in spring 1916, a German submarine torpedoed the French ship, Sussex. See alsoChapter 13.

    M

    mandates: In foreign policy, a term used to describe the legal status of former territories of the defeated Central powers (chiefly Imperial Germany and the Ottoman Empire) after World War I (1914–1918), which were to be administered by the governments of the victorious Allies. These lands were to be governed with due consideration of the inhabitants, under the supervision of the League of Nations. The nations administering mandated lands were forbidden to construct fortifications or raise an army within the mandates’ territory. See alsoChapters 9 and 10.

    manifest destiny: The idea held to be true by many Americans in the pre-Civil War era that the United States was meant to expand across the North American continent, stretching from the Atlantic in the east to the Pacific in the west. Although the term manifest destiny was first used by John L. O'Sullivan in 1845 in the United States Magazine and Democratic Review in an article titled “Annexation,” the concept of westward expansion dates back to the time of the thirteen colonies and was expanded in the early years of the Republic. In the 1820s, Representative Francis Baylies of Massachusetts noted, “… our natural boundary is the Pacific Ocean. The tide of our population must roll on until that mighty ocean interposes its waters, and limits our territorial empire.” The term itself fell into disuse in the mid-nineteenth century, but the idea that the United States has a mission to promote and defend democracy throughout the world continues to have an influence on American political ideology and policy even today. See alsoChapter 2.

    Marshall Plan: Foreign aid proposal put forth in 1947 by Secretary of State George C. Marshall to provide vast amounts of economic assistance to facilitate the recovery of Europe after World War II (1939–1945) and prevent further Soviet expansion into a weakened Western Europe. Officially known as the European Recovery Program (ERP), the plan stated that the United States would aid any government in recovery measures directed against “hunger, poverty, desperation, and chaos.” To this end, from 1949 to 1952, the United States poured more than $13 billion into sixteen European countries. The Soviet gains in Europe stopped as the Western European nations rapidly regained their economic health. See alsoChapters 16 and 17.

    MayagüezIncident: In May 1975, a military excursion usually considered the last official battle of the Vietnam War. After the last U.S. military forces departed from South Vietnam in April 1975, in what President Gerald R. Ford (1974–1977) called “a humiliating withdrawal,” U.S. military involvement in Southeast Asia was to have officially ended. On May 12, 1975, however, an American merchant ship, the SS Mayagüez, was in a regular shipping lane in the Gulf of Thailand, about sixty miles from the coast of Cambodia but only about eight miles from the island of Poulo Wai, claimed by Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Gunboats of the Cambodian navy seized the Mayagüez and then began towing the ship to the Cambodian mainland. When word reached the White House, President Ford was determined to prevent the situation from deteriorating. In addition, after the embarrassing withdrawal from South Vietnam after the fall of Saigon, it was believed to be diplomatically important to counter a growing perception among U.S. allies and adversaries that America was “a helpless giant” and an unreliable ally.

    After intense deliberation in the White House, an extravagant plan that employed two destroyers, one aircraft carrier, two marine units with twelve helicopters, and a huge array of Air Force fighters, bombers, and reconnaissance aircraft was approved. President Ford believed that it was better to use too much force rather than too little, and military operations began on the morning of May 15. The destroyer USS Holt was directed to seize the Mayagüez, while Marines, airlifted and supported by the Air Force, would rescue the crew. At the same time, the aircraft carrier Coral Sea would launch four bombing strikes on military targets on the Cambodian mainland to convince the Khmer Rouge, the Communist government of Cambodia, that the United States was serious; the bombing apparently convinced the Khmer Rouge leaders that they had underestimated U.S. resolve. As the American assault on nearby Kho-Tang Island was raging, a fishing boat approached another American ship with white flags flying. Aboard were the thirty-nine crew members of the Mayagüez. Although the ship and its crew were rescued, eighteen Marines and airmen were killed or missing in the assault and withdrawal from Kho-Tang, and twenty-three others were killed in a helicopter crash. The names of the Americans killed in this incident are among the last carved into the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. See alsoChapter 23.

    Mexican-American War (1846–1848): Conflict between the United States and Mexico that began as a dispute over the southern boundary of Texas and concluded with an American victory. After the United States annexed the Republic of Texas in 1845, Mexico responded by breaking diplomatic relations. Mexico claimed that the southern boundary of Texas was the Nueces River, but Texas and the United States insisted that the border was farther south, at the Rio Grande. In early 1846, President James K. Polk (1845–1849), an ardent expansionist, ordered General Zachary Taylor to take up a position on the Rio Grande; thus, Polk purposely ordered Taylor to move into the disputed area. After several weeks, Mexican troops attacked the American soldiers. On May 11, 1846, Polk sent his war message to Congress, and two days later, Congress asserted that, “by act of the Republic of Mexico, a state of war exists between that government and the United States.” Fighting raged through the rest of 1846 and 1847, until the American troops under General Winfield Scott occupied Mexico City, the national capital, in September 1847. In 1848, representatives of the two nations signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, in which Mexico was forced to recognize the annexation of Texas and the Rio Grande boundary. It also ceded California and New Mexico to the United States, helping to fulfill the concept of Manifest Destiny. This vast territory includes what is today the states of California, Nevada, Utah, most of Arizona and New Mexico, and small parts of Colorado and Wyoming—nearly half of Mexico's land. In return for this huge land cession, the United States paid Mexico $15 million and agreed to assume debts that Mexico owed citizens of the United States, which totaled about $3.25 million. See alsoChapter 2.

    military-industrial complex: Coined by President Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961) in his final speech to the nation, term used to describe the growing influence of the military on U.S. economy and culture. As one of the generals of World War II (1939–1945), Eisenhower was opposed to an independent role for the military in shaping defense policy. He warned against the consequences of a close connection between America's military establishment and the huge arms industry, predicting a misallocation of power. In his speech he noted, “We must never let the weight of this [military-industrial] combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.” See alsoChapter 24.

    Monroe Doctrine (1823): Foreign policy principle warning European powers against involvement in the Western Hemisphere. Expressed by President James Monroe (1817–1825) in his December 1823 annual message to Congress, this policy became known as the Monroe Doctrine. It consists of two principle sections, the first aimed at Russia. It declared “… that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subject to future colonization by any European powers….” The second section was aimed at those powers that might intervene in Latin America, stating, “that we should consider any attempt on their [European powers] part to extend to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety.” Monroe also made it clear that the United States would not interfere in European affairs, saying, “Our policy in regard to Europe … [is] not to interfere in the internal concerns of any of its powers … [but] to cultivate friendly relations … and to preserve those relations by a frank, firm, and manly policy, meeting in all instances the just claims of every power, submitting to injuries from none.” Although the doctrine was neither binding nor part of international law, it lasted because it asserted a policy that the United States found to be profitable for many years to come. Later, the Monroe Doctrine would become the cornerstone of American foreign policy in the Western Hemisphere, establishing a precedent for future administrations. See alsoChapters 1 and 2.

    most-favored-nation status: In international economic relations, a level of treatment accorded by one state to another for the purposes of international trade. In the early days of international trade, most-favored-nation status was attributed usually on a bilateral, state-to-state basis; one nation could enter into a most favored nation treaty with another nation. For example, under the terms of the 1794 Jay Treaty, the United States granted most-favored-nation trading status to Great Britain. Since the end of World War II (1939–1945), all members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have most-favored-nation status, and all receive the same trade benefits as all other members. See alsoChapter 16.

    multilateral: Of or referring to an agreement among three or more parties, agencies, or national governments. In international relations, the term multilateralism refers to a foreign policy strategy in which multiple countries work in concert on global issues. International organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) are multilateral in nature. See alsoChapters 16 and 33.

    Munich Conference: Meeting held in Munich, Germany, in September 1938, attended by representatives from Germany, Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and Italy. The Munich Pact, concluded at the conference, allowed Nazi Germany to annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, where a majority of the population was ethnic German. Thus, the Allies allowed Germany to erase the boundaries established by the Versailles Treaty (1919) without taking military action. Upon his return to Britain, Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain (in power 1937–1940) delivered his famous “peace for our time” speech to delighted crowds in London. At the conference, it was also agreed that the sovereignty of Poland would be protected; Nazi Germany violated this part of the agreement by invading Poland on September 1, 1939, leading to the outbreak of World War II (1939–1945). Today, the conference is generally considered a failed act of appeasement toward Nazi Germany. See alsoChapter 15.

    Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD): A national security policy and military strategy in which two opposing sides recognize that the full-scale use of nuclear weapons would result in the total destruction of both the attacker and the defender, and therefore agree not to attack. A policy based on MAD assumes that a war would have no victory nor armistice but only annihilation. It is based on the theory of deterrence, which calls for the deployment of powerful weapons as essential to threaten the enemy and prevent the opposing party's use of the same weapons. After World War II (1939–1945), both the United States and the Soviet Union gained a greater ability to deliver nuclear weapons into the interior of the opposing country. In the United States, the official nuclear policy was one of “massive retaliation,” a term coined by Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, who served under President Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961). This policy called for a massive attack against the Soviet Union if it were to invade Europe, regardless of whether the attack was conventional or nuclear. This policy was considered viable throughout the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s.

    The original idea of MAD was modified in mid-1980, when President Jimmy Carter (1977–1981) adopted the concept of countervailing strategy. According to Secretary of Defense Harold Brown (in office 1977–1981), countervailing strategy's response to a Soviet attack was not to include the bombing of Russian population centers and cities, but first to kill the Soviet leadership and then attack military targets. This would be done in the hope of a Soviet surrender before that nation's total annihilation and the destruction of the United States. This modified version of MAD was seen as a winnable nuclear war, while still maintaining the possibility of assured destruction for at least one party. This policy was developed further during the presidency of Ronald Reagan (1981–1989) with the announcement of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), intended to develop space-based technology to destroy Soviet missiles before they could reach the United States. Since the fall of communism and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, MAD has become irrelevant, as the United States and Russia have generally maintained a strategy of cooperation. During the administration of President William J. Clinton (1993–2001), another strategy was proposed: mutual assured safety. See alsoChapter 20.

    N

    NAFTA: Trade agreement among the United States, Canada, and Mexico which went into effect on January 1, 1994. The North American Free Trade Agreement has led to greatly increased trade between the United States and its NAFTA partners. NAFTA created the world's largest free trade area, linking 450 million people producing $17 trillion worth of goods and services. See alsoChapters 31 and 34.

    nation building: The process of creating a national identity using the power of the state so that eventually the unified nation and people create a stable government. After World War II (1939–1945), the term referred to the building of national identities in newly independent countries, especially in Africa, where colonial powers had drawn random borders without any sense of tribal loyalties or animosities. Nation building included creating all the trappings of a national identity—national flag, national airline, national stadium, national myths, as well as building infrastructure. More recently, the term nation building has come to be used in a different context, namely the use of military forces in the aftermath of a conflict to effect a transition to democracy. In this sense, the term describes the efforts of a foreign power to construct or install the institutions of a national government. See alsoChapter 40.

    national interest: A plan that dictates a country's goals or ambitions, whether economic, political, cultural, or military. Nicoló Machiavelli is often considered the first political thinker to develop the concept of national interest. Today, the concept of “the national interest” is most often associated with political realists, as opposed to idealists, who seek to inject a sense of morality into foreign policy. In most countries, which goals and objectives constitute the national interest is a subject of much debate and controversy. See alsoChapters 35 and 39.

    National Security Council (NSC): In the United States, the president's primary forum for coordinating foreign policy and national security issues. Established in 1947, and chaired by the president, the council advises the president on “the integration of domestic, foreign, and military policies relating to national security.” Policymakers created the NSC, convinced that the diplomacy of the Department of State was no longer adequate to contain the Soviet Union in light of the increasing tensions between that nation and the United States. Members include the vice president, the secretary of state, and the secretary of defense. The head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the military adviser to the council, and the director of National Intelligence is the intelligence adviser. The chief of staff to the president, counsel to the president, and the assistant to the president for economic policy are also invited to attend any NSC meeting. Other high-ranking government officials may be invited as necessary. The president appoints and the Senate confirms the national security adviser, who directs the various activities of the NSC staff. In 2009, President Barack Obama (2009–) merged the White House staff supporting the Homeland Security Council (HSC) and the National Security Council into one National Security Staff (NSS). Other nations have a similar advisory body. See alsoChapters 16, 17, and 40.

    nationalism: A pride and passionate belief in one's country (often also a particular race, religion, or culture). Nationalists tend to believe their nation and its leaders can do no wrong, beliefs that have resulted in episdoes of genocide and ethnic cleansing. Germany under Adolf Hitler (in power 1933–1945) and Serbia under Slobodan Milo?evi? (in power 1997–2000) were nations that fueled extreme nationalist sentiment. See alsoChapter 33.

    Nazi Party: National Socialist German Workers’ Party, active in Germany from 1919 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler. After taking power in 1933, Hitler proclaimed himself fürher, or leader, and with the support of the Nazi Party he rapidly transformed Germany into a police state. He advanced the idea that the Germans were a “master race” and that it was Germany's destiny to rule the world. The Nazis persecuted religious and cultural minorities imagined to be racially inferior and forced millions into death camps. Hilter's “final solution” was to exterminate more than six million European Jews in the Holocaust, a systematic campaign of genocide. With Germany's defeat in World War II, the Nazi Party collapsed. See alsoChapter 12.

    Neutrality Acts: A series of laws passed by Congress in the 1930s, the decade before World War II (1939–1945), designed to keep the United States out of another conflict in Europe. These laws included a prohibition on the sale of arms to foreigners and of loans to European nations that still owed money from World War I (1914–1918), though restrictions were eased as the war in Europe loomed. See alsoChapter 13.

    Nine-Power Treaty: Agreement reached in 1922, which was signed by nine nations: the United States, Great Britain, France, Belgium, Italy, Japan, China, the Netherlands, and Portugal. It was intended to make the 1899 Open Door Policy into international law. The treaty was unsuccessful as it lacked any means of enforcement; it was abrogated in 1931 when Japan invaded and seized Manchuria, a northern province of China, and established the puppet state of Manchukuo. See alsoChapter 11.

    nonintervention: The foreign policy of avoiding conflict (not directly connected to self-defense) and alliances with other nations while still maintaining diplomatic relations.

    In the early years of the Republic, U.S. foreign policy was essentially noninterventionist as the nation's political leaders followed the advice of President George Washington (1789–1797) to avoid “entangling alliances.” After the nation's participation in World War I (1914–1918), American public opinion strongly supported a policy of nonintervention, which was reflected in the nation's relations with other countries. See alsoChapter 13.

    nonstate actors: Groups or organizations that are not nations but play a role in international relations. The number of nonstate actors has grown significantly since the end of World War II (1939–1945), and several types operate in the international community. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are groups, such as the United Nations (UN) or Doctors without Borders, which are typically considered a part of civil society. Multinational corporations (MNCs) are for-profit organizations that operate in three or more sovereign nations. Often the international media are considered nonstate actors because of the influence they exert on international issues. Violent nonstate actors are armed groups, including groups such as al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah. Criminal organizations, such as drug cartels or the Mafia are also nonstate actors. Religious groups, such as the Quakers, often are considered to be nonstate actors. For example, the Quakers are active in their international advocacy efforts and have in part founded other nonstate actors such as Amnesty International, Greenpeace, and OXFAM. Finally, transnational diaspora communities, such as the Roma in Europe, may be nonstate actors. See alsoChapter 40.

    normalcy: Term coined by Republican Warren G. Harding during his campaign for the presidency in 1920. During the campaign, Harding noted, “America's present need” was not nostrums [reforms], but normalcy.” “The world,” he said, “needs to be reminded that all human ills are not curable by legislation.” Harding may have been alluding to the pleasant, peaceful life he had lived in Marion, Ohio, and in Washington, D.C., during his years as a senator. See alsoChapter 11.

    North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD): A binational military command between the United States and Canada established in May 1958 to defend North American airspace by monitoring human-made objects in space. With its command center located at Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado, the headquarters are responsible for detecting, substantiating, and warning of attack against North America by aircraft, missiles, or spacecraft. Through exceptional binational cooperation, NORAD has proven itself effective in its roles of watching, warning, and responding, and thus continues to play an important role in the defense of Canada and the United States by evolving to meet today's threats of domestic and international attack. The events of September 11, 2001, confirmed NORAD's relevance to North American security by providing civil authorities with a powerful military response capability. In May 2006, the NORAD Agreement was renewed for the eighth time and a maritime warning mission was added. This aspect of the command entails a shared knowledge and understanding of the activities conducted in U.S. and Canadian maritime areas and inland waterways. See alsoChapters 16, 31, and 35.

    North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): Signed in spring 1949, alliance among the United States, Canada, and ten European nations, for collective defense against a possible attack by the Soviet Union. From its founding, NATO encouraged political, military, economic, and cultural cooperation among its members. In addition to the United States and Canada, the other original members included the United Kingdom, France, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg, Portugal, Italy, and Iceland. In 1952, Greece and Turkey joined the alliance; West Germany was admitted in 1955 and Spain in 1982. After the reunification of Germany in 1990, the former East Germany was incorporated as well. After the fall of communism in Eastern Europe, several former Communist nations also joined the alliance. Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary joined in 1999; Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania, and Bulgaria, as well as the former Soviet Republics of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, joined in 2004; and Croatia and Albania in 2009. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, NATO turned essentially to crisis management, sending peacekeeping troops into Bosnia, Herzegovina, Afghanistan, and Iraq. See alsoChapters 16 and 33.

    Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (1968): Agreement to limit the spread of nuclear weapons and to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology across the world. The treaty was proposed by Ireland and Finland, the first member states to sign, and it went into effect in 1970. More than 185 nations have signed the treaty, including the five recognized nuclear-weapon states: the United States, Russia, Great Britain, France, and China. Under the terms of the treaty, nuclear weapons states are permitted to keep their nuclear arsenals provided they do not transfer nuclear weapons to non-nuclear weapons states nor assist them in developing nuclear weapons. Three nations known to possess nuclear weapons are not part of the treaty: India, Pakistan, and North Korea. (North Korea acceded to the treaty, violated it, and in 2003 withdrew from it.) Israel, which has also refused to sign the treaty, maintains an official policy of “nuclear ambiguity,” meaning it has never admitted to having nuclear weapons. Instead, Israel has stated repeatedly that it would not be the first country to “introduce” nuclear weapons to the Middle East. Nonetheless, Israel is believed to possess between seventy-five and four hundred nuclear warheads and the ability to deliver them by missile, aircraft, or submarine. See alsoChapters 16 and 40.

    nuncio: A permanent representative of the pope, vested with both political and ecclesiastical powers, appointed to the court of a sovereign or assigned to a definite territory. The special character of a nuncio, as distinguished from other papal envoys (such as legates) is that the office is specifically defined and limited to a definite district (his nunciature), where he must reside. His mission is general, embracing the interests of the Holy See. The office requires the appointment of a successor when the incumbent is recalled or dies. See alsoChapter 14.

    O

    Open Door Policy: Proposed in 1898 by President William McKinley (1879–1901), guiding principle of U.S. economic strategy that the United States as well as Japan and the European powers have equal trading opportunities in China. In 1898, Great Britain suggested that the United States join with it in supporting equal trading opportunities in China, an open-door policy regardless of which countries held spheres of influence in China. Secretary of State John Hay responded, in 1899, by sending identical notes to Britain, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, and Japan, asking each nation to grant equal trade privileges to the other nations. Hay's proposal was not well received in Europe. Only Britain agreed, and with exceptions. Nevertheless, in July 1900, Hay boldly announced that all nations had given “final and definite” approval and that the Open Door Policy was, therefore, in effect. After 1899, the Open Door Policy merged into a doctrine with more general applicability, one that stated America's interest in providing equal opportunity and nondiscrimination for trade and investment worldwide. See alsoChapter 6.

    Oregon Treaty (1846): Agreement between the United States and Great Britain which peaceably settled the Oregon question. By the 1840s, considerable dissention had developed between the United States and Great Britain over control of the Oregon Country. The United States claimed all of the territory south of Parallel 54 degrees 40 minutes north. Britain claimed the territory north of the forty-second parallel. In reality, however, the contested area was essentially the region between the Columbia River on the south and the forty-ninth parallel on the north. After the election of 1844, President James K. Polk (1845–1849), a fervent expansionist, accepted a British proposal to extend the international boundary along the forty-ninth parallel west to Puget Sound and south of Vancouver Island to the Pacific. Polk wisely avoided a possible war with Great Britain when war with Mexico seemed imminent. The U.S. states of Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and parts of Montana and Wyoming were carved from the land received by the United States. The British area became the Canadian province of British Columbia. See alsoChapter 2.

    Organization of American States (OAS): Designed to address security issues and settle disputes, multinational organization made up of all thirty-five nations of the Western Hemisphere. The world's oldest regional organization, the OAS dates back to the First International Conference of American States, held in Washington, D.C., from October 1889 to April 1890. The International Union of American Republics was established at that conference, setting the stage for interhemispheric cooperation. The OAS came into being in 1948, with the signing of the OAS Charter in Bogotá, Colombia; the charter has been amended numerous times. The goal of the OAS, as stated in Article 1 of its Charter, is to establish among its member states “an order of peace and justice, to promote their solidarity, to strengthen their collaboration, and to defend their sovereignty, their territorial integrity, and their independence.” Today, the OAS comprises the thirty-five independent states of the Americas, and it has granted observer status to sixty-three states, as well as to the European Union (EU). It is the primary political, juridical, and social governmental forum in the Western Hemisphere. See alsoChapter 31.

    Oslo Accords (1993): Officially known as the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, or simply the Declaration of Principles (DOP), a milestone in the ongoing Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The accords marked the first direct, face-to-face agreement between the government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The accords were intended to be the framework for future negotiations and relations between the Israeli government and the Palestinians within which all outstanding “final status issues” between the two sides would be addressed and resolved. Negotiated in secret in Oslo, Norway, the accords were officially signed at a public ceremony in Washington, D.C., on September 13, 1993, in the presence of PLO chairman Yasser Arafat, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, and President William J. Clinton (1993–2001). Most significant was the PLO's acceptance of the right of Israel to exist and its renouncing its claim to most of the territory on which Israel had been founded. In return, Israel agreed to gradually withdraw its forces from parts of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank and affirmed a Palestinian right of self-government within those areas; a Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority was also created. Palestinian rule was to last for a five-year interim period during which permanent status negotiations would commence, no later than May 1996, to reach a final agreement. Major issues such as Israeli security and borders, the status of Jerusalem, Palestinian refugees, and the future of Israeli settlements were to be decided at these permanent status negotiations. However, the accords have not been implemented fully and their future as a template for peace has become increasingly clouded. See alsoChapter 38.

    P

    Pan-American Congress (1889): The first of a series of conferences held among nations of the Western Hemisphere. U.S. Secretary of State James G. Blaine initiated the conference in 1889 to establish closer ties between the United States and Latin America, hoping that improved relations would open Latin American markets to U.S. trade. Gathered together in Washington, D.C., eighteen nations founded the International Union of American Republics. The Ninth International Conference of American States, held in Bogotá, Colombia, between March and May 1948, was led by U.S. Secretary of State George C. Marshall. At this meeting, member nations pledged to fight communism in the Americas. This event led to the birth of the Organization of American States (OAS) as it stands today. See alsoChapter 4.

    peace dividend: Term used to describe the benefits that would arise from the decrease in defense spending after the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, many Western nations significantly cut military spending, thus freeing public money for other programs. See alsoChapters 28, 29, and 30.

    peace with honor: Phrase used by President Richard M. Nixon (1969–1974) in a January 23, 1973, speech, announcing the Paris Peace Accord that ended American involvement in the Vietnam War (1945–1975). The accord specified that a cease-fire would take place four days later and that within sixty days of the cease-fire, the North Vietnamese would release all U.S. prisoners of war (POWs) and all American troops would withdraw from South Vietnam. The phrase is a variation of a campaign promise Nixon made in 1968, “I pledge to you that we shall have an honorable end to the war in Vietnam.” The phrase is considered euphemistic by critics, as Saigon, the capital of South Vietnam, fell to the North in April 1975. See alsoChapter 23.

    peaceful coexistence: Concept promulgated by Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev (in power 1953–1964) that stated that Communist nations could peacefully exist with capitalist nations, as opposed to the Marxist-Leninist principle that communism and capitalism could never coexist in peace. The policy arose to reduce hostility between the Soviet Union and the United States, particularly as their growing arsenals led to the increased possibility of nuclear war. Khrushchev tried to demonstrate his commitment to peaceful coexistence by attending international peace conferences such as the Geneva Summit in 1955 and by traveling internationally. The policy also reflected a key shift in the Soviet Union's strategic military position—the move away from large, and possibly politically provocative, military ventures toward armed forces focused on proxy wars and the development of a strategic nuclear missile force. See alsoChapters 16 and 17.

    peacekeeping: Term defined by the United Nations (UN) as “a unique and dynamic instrument developed by the Organization as a way to help countries torn by conflict create the conditions for lasting peace.” Peacekeepers observe peace processes in postconflict areas and help ex-combatants in implementing the peace agreements they may have signed. UN peacekeeping assistance may come in many forms, including confidence-building measures, power-sharing provisions, electoral support, and economic and social development. Thus, UN peacekeepers can include soldiers, police officers, and civilian personnel. See alsoChapters 16, 34, and 40.

    Pentagon: Five-sided office building located in Arlington County, Virginia, and home to the U.S. Department of Defense. The Pentagon is the largest office building in the world by floor area. Completed in 1943, the building itself, as well as the term Pentagon, has come to symbolize America's military might. On September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 and crashed it into the western side of the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m., killing 189 people: fifty-nine innocent civilians aboard the plane, 125 people working in the building, and the five hijackers. See alsoChapter 35.

    perestroika: A policy of economic and political “restructuring” begun by Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev (in power 1985–1991) in the late 1980s in an attempt to revive the languishing Soviet economy. Perestroika is considered to be a key factor in the fall of communism in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, as well as a cause of the end of the Cold War. See alsoChapter 29.

    Persian Gulf War (1991): Conflict between Iraq and a U.S.-led coalition of more than thirty nations, including Great Britain, France, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. The goal of the war was to drive the Iraqi army out of neighboring Kuwait, which Iraq had invaded on August 2, 1990, claiming that Kuwait was stealing Iraqi oil. Iraq then annexed Kuwait, which it had long claimed as its nineteenth province. During the Iraqi occupation, about one thousand Kuwaiti civilians were killed, and more than 300,000 people fled the country. The United Nations Security Council condemned the invasion and called for Iraq to withdraw immediately from Kuwait, which Iraq ignored; on November 29, the UN set January 15, 1991, as the deadline for Iraqi withdrawal. When Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein refused to comply, the UN-sanctioned invasion, known as Operation Desert Storm, was launched on January 17, 1991, under the leadership of U.S. General Norman Schwarzkopf. The U.S.-led coalition began a massive air campaign, flying more than 100,000 sorties, dropping 88,500 tons of bombs, and widely destroying military and civilian infrastructure. In response, Iraq launched Scud missiles at Israel (in an unsuccessful attempt to widen the war and break up the coalition) and at Saudi Arabia. Coalition forces invaded Kuwait and Iraq on February 24, and over the next four days, encircled and defeated the Iraqis and liberated Kuwait. When President George H. W. Bush (1989–1993) declared a cease fire on February 28, most of the Iraqi forces in Kuwait had either surrendered or fled. Although the exact number of Iraqi combat casualties is unknown, it is believed to have been between twenty thousand and thirty-five thousand fatalities. As of February 2011, the United States Department of Defense reported that U.S. forces suffered 148 battle-related deaths and another 145 deaths in noncombat accidents. See alsoChapters 38 and 39.

    Pinckney's Treaty (1795): Also known as the Treaty of Madrid or the Treaty of San Lorenzo, agreement reached by the United States and Spain which settled several key disagreements between the two nations. Thomas Pinckney, then the U.S. ambassador to Great Britain, negotiated the treaty for the United States, and Don Manuel de Godoy represented Spain. Under the terms of Pinckney's Treaty, the lower Mississippi River was opened to navigation by Americans, and New Orleans was established as a “port of deposit” for American goods. Spain also recognized the borders of the United States as established by the Treaty of Paris of 1783, namely the Mississippi River as the western boundary and the thirty-first parallel as the southern boundary. See alsoChapter 1.

    ping-pong diplomacy: Term that refers to the visit of ping pong players from the United States to the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the early 1970s. The friendly games initiated a thaw in the relations between the United States and China, which at the time was considered one of America's staunchest foes. The games paved the way to a visit to China by President Richard M. Nixon (1969–1974) in 1972. The U.S. Table Tennis team was in Nagoya, Japan, in 1971, for the Thirty-first World Table Tennis Championship when, on April 6, they received an invitation to visit China. On April 10, 1971, the team became the first American sports delegation to set foot in Beijing, the Chinese capital, since 1949. In addition to playing friendly games of ping pong, the Americans also toured the Great Wall and the Summer Palace. President Nixon's subsequent visit to the People's Republic of China was an important step in formally normalizing relations between the two nations. During the week of June 9, 2008, a three-day Ping Pong Diplomacy event was held at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California. Original members of both the Chinese and American ping pong teams from 1971 were present and played. See alsoChapter 35.

    Platt Amendment: A rider attached to the Army Appropriations Act passed by Congress in 1901, after victorious U.S. forces occupied Cuba following the Spanish-American War (1898). The amendment stipulated the conditions for the withdrawal of U.S. troops remaining in Cuba, declared that Cuba could make no agreement that would affect its independence, stated that the United States could intervene to keep order, and stipulated that the United States was to be given land, by sale or lease, for naval bases. Guantánamo became one of these bases. Thus, although Cuba became independent in name, the nation in many ways remained under control of the United States. The amendment defined Cuban-U.S. relations until the 1934 Treaty of Relations. See alsoChapters 6 and 7.

    Potsdam Conference (1945): Final meeting of the three great powers—the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union—in July and August 1945, held in Potsdam, near Berlin. As in other such meetings, Joseph Stalin (in power 1924–1953) represented the Soviet Union, but President Harry S. Truman (1945–1953) took the place of the late Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945), and Clement B. Attlee (1945–1951), as the new prime minister of Great Britain, replaced Winston Churchill (1940–1945, 1951–1955) as the talks went forward. The goal was to determine the fate of Germany and the lands it had invaded during World War II (1939–1945). By this time, Soviet armies occupied most of Eastern Europe, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, and Romania, and it became clear at this conference that Stalin was determined to retain control of these nations and make them satellites of the Soviet Union. Although the leaders of the Allied powers were determined to eliminate Nazi influence and prevent Germany from again becoming a military threat, little was accomplished at the conference. Germany and Austria were divided into four zones, with the Soviet Union, the United States, Britain, and France each occupying one zone. Western access to Berlin was acknowledged, but the Soviet Union refused to conclude any official agreement about the future of Germany. As there was no agreement on specific peace treaties, negotiations continued; not until 1947 were treaties worked out for Italy, Bulgaria, Finland, and Hungary. Significantly, the three leaders did agree to the prosecution of Nazi war criminals, leading to the Nuremburg Trials that began in November 1945 and lasted until October 1946. See alsoChapter 16.

    Powell Doctrine: A term, created by the media, used to describe a list of specific questions promulgated by General Colin L. Powell before the beginning of the Persian Gulf War (1991). These diplomatic questions, which must be answered (in the affirmative) before military action is undertaken, are: “Is a vital national security interest threatened? Do we have a clear attainable objective? Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed? Have all other nonviolent policy means been fully exhausted? Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement? Have the consequences of our action been fully considered? Is the action supported by the American people? Do we have genuine broad international support?” The Powell Doctrine is similar to a set of principles defined by Caspar Weinberger, defense secretary (in office 1981–1987) during the administration of Ronald Reagan (1981–1989). Although Powell rarely advocated force as the first solution to international conflict, he later expanded upon the doctrine, asserting that when a nation is at war, every resource should be used against the enemy, while at the same time minimizing U.S. casualties. In a 2009 interview, Powell noted that the doctrine also calls for the exhausting of all “political, economic, and diplomatic means,” before a nation should resort to military force. See alsoChapter 35.

    prisoner of war (POW): In or after an armed conflict, an individual, either civilian or combatant, who is held by an enemy power. The earliest recorded usage of the phrase is in 1660. The Hague Convention (1907), the subsequent Geneva Convention (1929), and the 1949 update to the 1929 convention, covered the treatment of prisoners of war in detail. One of the major provisions of the convention makes it illegal to torture prisoners and states that prisoners can only be required to give their name, date of birth, rank, and service number. During the twentieth century, Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany were known to commit atrocities against prisoners of war during World War II (1939–1945). The German military used the Soviet Union's refusal to sign the Geneva Convention as a reason for not providing the necessities of life to Soviet POWs. North Korean and North and South Vietnamese forces regularly killed or mistreated prisoners taken during those conflicts. Since the Vietnam War (1945–1975), the official U.S. military term for enemy POWs is Enemy Prisoner of War (EPW). This change was introduced to distinguish between enemy and U.S. captives. See alsoChapters 9, 14, and 23.

    proxy war: A war in which two nations support military action between other parties, rather than fighting each other directly. During the Cold War era, the Korean War (1950–1953) and the Vietnam War (1945–1975) were proxy wars between the United States and the Soviet Union. See alsoChapters 19 and 23.

    puppet state: A nation that is controlled by another more powerful nation. A puppet state lacks independence, but the controlling power preserves all the external trappings of independence, such as a national flag, currency, and leadership. In the twentieth century, for example, Imperial Japan invaded Manchuria, a northern province of China, and established the puppet state of Manchukuo. See alsoChapters 12 and 13.

    Q

    Quasi War: Lasting from 1798 to 1800, an undeclared war between the United States and France. After the XYZ Affair, indignation rose and many Americans called for war against France. Although President John Adams (1797–1801) was committed to peace, the United States and France fought each other at sea where American ships captured several French vessels and harassed French commerce in the Caribbean region. In 1800, after the French foreign minister, the Duc de Talleyrand, indicated that ministers from the United States would be received with all due respect, Adams sent a commission to France. By that time, First Consul Napoleon Bonaparte had assumed power and offered a more conciliatory diplomatic stance. As a result, the commission worked successfully with the French and signed the Convention of 1800 on September 30, ending the Quasi War. See alsoChapter 1.

    R

    Reconstruction: Period in U.S. history immediately following the Civil War (1861–1865) to 1877, when President Rutherford B. Hayes (1877–1881) ordered the removal of federal troops from the vanquished South. After the turmoil of civil war, the South was in ruins, governmental functions stopped, and the economy was in shambles. Reconstructionera laws, supported by northern radical Republicans, attempted to restore the seceded states to the Union, establish new governments, and secure the rights of the recently freed slaves. After Hayes withdrew federal troops from the South in 1877, white supremacy was restored throughout the region. The Democratic Party took control of state and local governments and quickly passed laws, known as Jim Crow laws, which restricted the rights of African Americans and denied them many of the rights they had gained during Reconstruction, including the right to vote. Politically, the region became known as the “Solid South,” as it overwhelmingly supported the Democratic Party and was vital to the party's success. Many later foreign policy issues have their roots in the Reconstruction period. For example, during Reconstruction, the number of immigrants, mostly European, began to increase, thus creating a cheap labor force for rapid industrialization and improved agriculture, which later made the United States a world economic power. While Europeans were welcomed, for the most part, Asian immigrants were not. Anti-Chinese sentiments in California and the west ultimately resulted in the passage of the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act. Later, the informal 1907 Gentlemen's Agreement greatly limited Japanese immigration. See alsoChapters 3 and 4.

    red scare: Term used after both World War I (1914–1918) and World War II (1939–1945) to describe the fear of rising communism in the United States. Near the end of World War I, a Communist revolution occurred in Russia, and its leaders supported revolution worldwide. The fear of communism mounted in the United States, especially after a wave of strikes and several isolated bombings in 1919 and 1920. The strikes and bombings were blamed on the communists and led the federal government to vigorously search for “Reds.” During this time, several hundred aliens were imprisoned and deported, often without due process of law. After World War II, a fear of communists infiltrating the government seized the nation, and the term red scare was again applied to this panic. Senator Joseph McCarthy's widespread accusations that the State Department was “thoroughly infested with Communists,” which he claimed posed a threat to national security, epitomized the red scare of the early 1950s. For more than three years, McCarthy and his zealous supporters mounted a paranoid crusade searching for Communist influences on American culture, even falsely accusing Republican officials in the administration of Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961) of favoring communism. McCarthy lost his following after the nation saw him on television tearing into witnesses during a hearing in which he accused the U.S. army of “softness on communism.” In December 1954, the U.S. Senate censured McCarthy for acting “contrary to senatorial ethics” and obstructing the “constitutional processes of the Senate.” See alsoChapters 16 and 17.

    refugee: A person who has been forced to leave his or her home country and seek refuge elsewhere. The 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees defined a refugee as a person who “owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country.” Under U.S. law, to apply for refugee status, the applicant must be located physically outside the United States. One year after legally being granted refugee status in the United States, the applicant may apply for a Green Card, indicating lawful permanent residence, and eventually for U.S. citizenship. See alsoChapters 16 and 23.

    rivalries: In international relations, competition between nations or groups of nations. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union and its satellite states and the United States and its allies exhibited worldwide rivalry, which led to competition in influencing nonaligned nations, a costly arms race, the space race, and a struggle to develop superior technologies. See alsoChapters 17, 26, and 28.

    rogue states: Nations that reject international law and are considered to be threats to world peace. Rogue states are known to restrict human rights, sponsor terrorism, and seek weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). In the 1990s, the U.S. government considered North Korea, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Sudan, and Yugoslavia to be rogue states. Yugoslavia was removed from the list after the overthrow of Slobodan Milo?evi? in 2000. Afghanistan was removed from the list after the 2001 U.S.-led invasion of that nation; Iraq was removed in 2003 after U.S.-led forces invaded and Saddam Hussein fled from power. Using diplomacy, Libya worked to remove itself from the list of rogue states. Rogue states are feared and condemned by the international community but are differentiated from “pariah states,” such as Zimbabwe and Myanmar (Burma), which restrict and abuse the human rights of their citizenry but are not perceived as threats beyond their own borders. See alsoChapter 35.

    Roosevelt Corollary: Foreign policy pronouncement made by President Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909) in his 1904 annual message to Congress in which he expanded upon the Monroe Doctrine (1823) in order to stipulate American involvement in Latin America. Asserting America's right to maintain order and protect American interests, Roosevelt declared: “If a nation [in Latin America] shows that it knows how to act with reasonable efficiency and decency in social and political matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need fear no interference from the United States. Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of international police power.” Implicitly, Roosevelt was warning Europeans to stay out of Latin America. Throughout the early years of the twentieth century, the United States intervened in the affairs of several Latin American nations to protect property and lives and to collect debts. The United States took over the actual control of finances in Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Honduras, and Nicaragua. To enforce its will, the United States sent marines to Nicaragua and Haiti. This policy was renounced by the Good Neighbor Policy initiated in 1934 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945). See alsoChapter 7.

    Root-Takahira Agreement (1908): Accord between the United States and Japan in which the two nations agreed to support “by all pacific means” the “independence and integrity of China” and to maintain the “principle of equal opportunity for commerce and industry of all nations,” that is, the Open Door Policy. See alsoChapter 7.

    S

    Second Continental Congress (1775–1781): The de facto governing body of the thirteen united colonies during the War for Independence (1775–1783). Delegates to the First Continental Congress (1774) had agreed to hold another meeting in 1775 if Great Britain failed to end colonial grievances. Three weeks after the battles of Lexington and Concord (April 1775), twelve colonies sent representatives to the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia. (Georgia did not send delegates until the following autumn.) The Congress assumed responsibility for the colonial troops around Boston and, by unanimous vote, appointed George Washington as commander in chief of the Continental Army. Tensions with Great Britain were high. In mid-1775, the Congress drew up a Declaration of Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms. In it, the delegates resolved to “… die freemen rather than live slaves,” but went on to note, “We have not raised armies with ambitious designs of separating from Great Britain and establishing independent states.” In July 1775, Congress adopted the Olive Branch Petition, reasserting the colonists’ loyalty to the Crown, but the following month King George III (reigned 1760–1820) refused to accept the petition and declared that the colonies were in a state of rebellion.

    In December 1775, Parliament forbade all trade with the colonies, leading John Adams (then one of the Massachusetts representatives) to declare that this act “makes us independent in spite of supplications and entreaties.” After much debate, Congress adopted a resolution for independence, drawing up the declaration that Congress adopted on July 4. The Second Continental Congress then assumed directing the conduct of the War for Independence. The Congress requested that each colony send money to finance the war and printed nearly $250 million to that end. During the course of the war, the Congress also borrowed money from European nations: $5 million from France, $1.25 million from the Netherlands, and $200,000 from Spain. In 1778, delegates from the Congress negotiated an alliance with France, which ultimately led to the American victory at Yorktown in 1781. After more than a year of debate, on November 15, 1777, Congress passed and sent to the states for ratification the Articles of Confederation. Virginia was the first to ratify the Articles, on December 16, 1777, and Maryland became the last to do so, on February 2, 1781. Finally, on March 1, 1781, the Articles of Confederation were signed and Congress declared them ratified. On the next day, the same congressional delegates met as the new Congress of the Confederation. The Second Continental Congress established the American precedent of conducting diplomatic relations through foreign ministers and other governmental representatives. See alsoChapter 1.

    sectionalism: Term used to describe the growing differences among the regions of the United States prior to the Civil War (1861–1865). In the early 1800s, while the North grew more industrialized and favored high tariffs to protect domestic industries, the South remained agricultural and opposed high tariffs, wanting to keep the cost of imported goods, upon which it depended, low. Southerners and northerners showed fierce loyalty to their regions rather than to the nation as a whole. The settlers of the West were mostly small farmers who wanted cheap land and demanded that the federal government make it available on easy terms. The Northern states had abolished slavery, and law prohibited slavery in the West; the South, however, increased its reliance on slave labor, especially after the 1793 invention of the cotton gin made cotton an extremely profitable crop. Slavery became a bitter sectional issue that ultimately led to the secession of the South and the Civil War. See alsoChapter 3.

    self-determination: In international law, the principle that free nations have the right to develop their own economic, social, and cultural destinies. The right to self-determination is embodied in several international documents, including the Charter of the United Nations, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. See alsoChapter 14.

    September 11, 2001: Date on which nineteen Islamic fundamentalists, members of the international terrorist group al Qaeda, hijacked four American airliners and crashed two planes into the twin towers of New York's World Trade Center and the third plane into the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. The fourth plane, which the hijackers had directed toward either the White House or the Capitol, crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, as the crew and some of the passengers attempted to retake control of the plane. There were no survivors from any of the flights; nearly three thousand innocent people and the nineteen hijackers died. Among the 2,752 victims who died in the World Trade Center attacks were 343 firefighters and sixty police officers from New York City and the Port Authority as well as people from more than seventy countries.

    The United States responded to the attacks by launching a so-called War on Terror and invading Afghanistan to depose the Taliban regime, which had harbored Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and other terrorists. The U.S. Congress also passed the controversial USA PATRIOT Act, signed into law by President George W. Bush (2001–2009) on October 26, 2001, which greatly expanded the ability of law enforcement agencies to search telephone and e-mail communications as well as procure financial and other personal records. It also eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States and expanded the secretary of the treasury's power to regulate financial transactions, especially those involving foreign individuals and entities. The law further expanded the discretion of law enforcement officers and immigration authorities to detain and deport immigrants suspected of terrorism. Responses to the 9/11 terrorist attacks marked a crucial turning point in domestic and international policies, including not only the constriction of civil liberties but also two costly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Since 9/11, terrorist activities have increased around the globe. See alsoChapter 35, 39, and 40.

    sharia law: The sacred law of Islam, which is based on the Quran. Examples are believed to have been set by the Prophet Mohammed. Muslims differ as to what exactly sharia requires. Sharia law deals with many of the same topics addressed by secular law, including crime, economics, and politics; it also addresses personal matters such as sexuality, hygiene, diet, prayer, and fasting. Where it has official status, sharia law is applied by Islamic judges. The reintroduction of sharia law is a longstanding goal for Islamist movements in Muslim countries. In the international media, it has come under significant criticism, particularly when punishments move away from established principles of international human rights. As examples, sharia law calls for the application of the death penalty for the crimes of adultery, blasphemy, apostasy, and homosexuality; amputations for the crime of theft; and flogging for fornication or public intoxication. See alsoChapters 38, 39, and 40.

    shock and awe: A military doctrine based on the use of overwhelming power, dominant maneuvers, and spectacular displays of force, all designed to destroy the enemies’ will to fight and force them into submission. The doctrine was developed by Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade of the National Defense University (NDU) in 1996. The United States used a shock-and-awe strategy in the launching of the 2003 Iraq War. The term is used to describe the beginning of the invasion, not the long-lasting war nor the insurgency. See alsoChapter 35.

    shuttle diplomacy: Term used in international diplomacy to describe the actions of a third-party intermediary between (or among) parties involved in a dispute. Usually, the intermediary travels, or shuttles, between the parties’ locations. The term became associated with U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's efforts to end the fighting during the 1973 Yom Kippur War between Israel and a coalition of Arab nations led by Egypt and Syria. See alsoChapter 26.

    small state diplomacy: The concept that small states must use particularly wise and strategic diplomatic means in the global arena to ensure that common goals, issues, and problems are addressed, given that they lack the power, resources, and population to otherwise assert themselves. Iceland provides an example of successful small state diplomacy. In the early 1950s, Iceland's government, reacting to a trend in world affairs, extended its fisheries limits from four miles to twelve miles. Over the next quarter of a century, Iceland supported international organizations to extend fisheries limits aggressively and progressively to the now universally accepted two hundred miles. The principal asset of this small state was the skill, persistence, and thorough knowledge of its diplomatic corps. See alsoChapter 40.

    Smoot-Hawley Tariff (1930): Tax law passed by the United States Congress in 1930. Also known as the Tariff Act of 1930, the law raised tariffs on more than 200,000 imported goods. In return, U.S. trading partners passed retaliatory tariffs that ultimately reduced American exports and imports by more than half. At the time, most economists opposed the law, and today many economists believe that the Smoot-Hawley Tariff contributed to the severity of the Great Depression around the world. See alsoChapter 12.

    socialism: A type of social and economic organization that advocates communal or public ownership of all property and control of the means of production. In Marxist theory, socialism is the type of governmment that arises after the proletariat takes over the means of production but before the state withers away and true communism is achieved. In a socialist society, the state controls the economy. See alsoChapters 11 and 14.

    sovereignty: Term used to describe the quality of having supreme authority over a geographic region. Sovereign nations are independent and free to determine their own foreign policy with respect to other nations. See alsoChapter 16.

    space race: Cold War competition between the United States and the Soviet Union to gain technological superiority in exploring outer space. The space race began on October 4, 1957, after the Soviets launched Sputnik I, the first artificial satellite to orbit the earth, a launch that was immediately perceived as a threat to U.S. security. One direct effect of the launch was a significant increase in educational spending in the United States, as the nation attempted to “catch up” to the Soviet Union. About four months after the launch of Sputnik, the United States successfully launched the Juno I rocket, which carried the satellite Explorer I. The next phase of the race focused on sending a human into space; here, again, the Soviet Union was first, sending cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin into space on April 12, 1961. Alan Shepard became the first American in space three weeks later, on May 5, 1961. On May 25 of the same year, President John F. Kennedy (1961–1963) announced the race to the moon in a special joint session of Congress: “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth.” This feat was achieved by the United States on July 20, 1969, when astronaut Neil Armstrong disembarked from the lunar module, Eagle, and set foot on the surface of the moon. Although much of the technology that runs modern society was developed as a result of the space race, its legacy is mixed. See alsoChapter 17.

    Spanish-American War (1898): Conflict between Spain and the United States which occurred as tensions between the two nations increased, especially over Spain's harsh treatment of Cuban rebels, which the yellow journalism of the time magnified. The spark that ignited the war was the sinking of the U.S. battleship Maine, which was docked in Havana to protect American lives and property. More than 260 sailors lost their lives. No one knows why the Maine exploded, but the American public, urged on by New York newspaper editors William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, quickly jumped to the conclusion that the Spanish had done it with a submarine mine. Public opinion nationwide demanded action. On April 11, 1898, although he was personally opposed to war, President William McKinley (1897–1901) asked Congress for authority to send American troops to Cuba to end the fighting there. On April 19, 1898, as Congress was considering McKinley's request, Senator Henry M. Teller of Colorado proposed the Teller amendment to ensure that the United States would not establish permanent control over Cuba after the war. The amendment, disavowing any intention of annexing Cuba, quickly passed both houses of Congress. The resolution also demanded Spanish withdrawal and authorized the president to use as much military force as he thought necessary to help Cuba gain independence from Spain.

    McKinley signed the joint resolution on April 20, 1898, and the ultimatum was sent to Spain. In response, Spain broke off diplomatic relations with the United States on April 21. On the same day, the U.S. Navy began a blockade of Cuba. Spain declared war on April 23; on April 25, Congress declared that a state of war between the United States and Spain had existed since April 21, the day the blockade had begun.

    Fighting lasted less than three months and hostilities ended on August 12. After more than two months of negotiations, the Treaty of Paris was signed on December 10, 1898, and ratified by the U.S. Senate on February 6, 1899. Under the terms of the peace treaty, the United States gained almost all of Spain's colonies, including the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico. Cuba formed its own government and attained independence on May 20, 1902. However, the United States imposed several restrictions on the new government, including prohibiting alliances with other countries, and it reserved the right to intervene. The United States also established a perpetual lease of Guantánamo Bay. The war is considered a turning point in U.S. foreign relations. See alsoChapter 6.

    spheres of influence: An area or region over which another usually more powerful nation exerts significant economic, cultural, or political influence. Before the implementation of the Open Door Policy in 1900, China was divided into spheres of influence among Russia, Japan, Germany, Great Britain, and France. During the Cold War, Cuba, Eastern Europe, North Korea, Vietnam, and the People's Republic of China (until the Sino-Soviet split in 1961) were said to be under the Soviet sphere of influence. In a similar fashion, Japan, South Korea, Western Europe, and Oceania were often said to be under the sphere of influence of the United States. See alsoChapter 7.

    Sputnik I: The first artificial satellite launched into outer space. With this achievement on October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union initiated the space race with the United States. A surprise to the United States, the launch created a sense of panic among many experts who believed that the Soviets could soon deploy a nuclear missile capable of reaching the United States. See alsoChapter 17.

    START I (1991): A bilateral treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union which was signed in 1991, just before the collapse of the Soviet Union, and went into effect in 1994. The first Strategic Arms Reduction (START) proposal was made in 1982 by President Ronald Reagan (1981–1989). One of the most complex nuclear arms treaties ever negotiated, it reduced the number of nuclear warheads by about 80 percent. A second Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START II) was signed by President George H.W. Bush (1989–1993) and Russian President Boris Yeltsin (1991–1999) in early January 1993. The U.S. Senate ratified the treaty, but the Russian Duma did not. In 2001, the START II treaty was bypassed by the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT), signed by presidents George W. Bush (2001–2009) and Vladimir Putin (2000–2008) in May 2002. The START I treaty expired on December 5, 2009; in April 2010, a new START treaty was signed in Prague by Presidents Barack Obama (2009–) and Dmitri Medvedev (2008–). See alsoChapters 29, 39, and 40.

    Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT): Between November 1969 and May 1979, a series of discussions, held alternatively in Helsinki, Finland, and Geneva, Switzerland, between the United States and the Soviet Union to negotiate limits on armaments. In the Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems (ABMs), the two moved to end a competition to develop additional defensive systems. In an Interim Agreement on Certain Measures with Respect to the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, both superpowers took the first steps to reduce their most powerful land- and submarine-based offensive nuclear weapons. On January 20, 1969, the day that President Richard M. Nixon (1969–1974) assumed office, the Soviet foreign minister expressed an interest in discussing strategic arms limitations. In turn, the new president initiated, under the guidance of the National Security Council (NSC), an extensive review of the strategic, political, and verification aspects of the issues. In October, it was announced that the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks would begin in Helsinki on November 17, 1969, “for preliminary discussion of the questions involved.” The talks led to two-and-a-half years of SALT I negotiations.

    In a summit meeting in Moscow, the first round of SALT ended on May 26, 1972, when President Nixon and General Secretary Brezhnev (in power 1964–1982) signed the ABM Treaty and the Interim Agreement on strategic offensive arms. SALT II negotiations began in November 1972 in Geneva. The primary goal of SALT II was to replace the Interim Agreement with a long-term treaty providing broad limits on strategic offensive weapons systems. A major breakthrough occurred at the Vladivostok meeting in November 1974 between President Gerald R. Ford (1974–1977) and General Secretary Brezhnev when both sides agreed to a basic framework for the SALT II agreement. President Jimmy Carter (1977–1981) and General Secretary Brezhnev signed the completed SALT II treaty in Vienna on June 18, 1979, and Carter transmitted it to the U.S. Senate on June 22 for ratification. On January 3, 1980, however, the president requested the Senate delay consideration of the treaty in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979. In May 1982, President Ronald Reagan (1981–1989) stated he would not act to undercut the SALT agreements as long as the Soviet Union showed equal restraint. The Soviet Union again agreed to abide by the unratified treaty. See alsoChapter 25.

    Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI): Developed in 1983 by President Ronald Reagan (1981–1989), plan that sought to end the threat of nuclear missiles with the use of land- and satellite-based systems to protect the United States from nuclear attacks. The initiative focused on strategic defense, rather than mutual assured defense (MAD). The elaborate plan was criticized as being unrealistic and quickly dubbed “Star Wars,” a reference to the popular movie of the 1970s. During the administration of President William J. Clinton (1993–2001), the program was renamed the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO), which in turn was renamed the Missile Defense Agency in 2002. The United States has spent more than $100 million on space-based missile defense system research and holds a commanding lead in the field of space technology and warfare. See alsoChapter 29.

    Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty: Officially, the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Strategic Offensive Reductions (SORT), better known as the Moscow Treaty, signed by presidents George W. Bush (2001–2009) and Vladimir Putin (2000–2008) in May 2002. Under the terms of this agreement, the parties agreed to reduce their nuclear arsenals to between 1,700 and 2,200 operational warheads each. The treaty went into effect on May 24, 2002, and expires on December 31, 2012. See alsoChapters 39 and 40.

    summit meetings: Conferences of governments’ heads of state, often with a high level of media coverage, a prearranged agenda, and tight security, to attempt to satisfy mutual demands through negotiation rather than warfare. During the Cold War era, meetings held between U.S. presidents and Soviet or Chinese leaders were termed summits. Since that time, the number and types of summit meetings have significantly increased, with topics ranging from global warming to the world economy. See alsoChapters 30 and 33.

    SussexPledge: Statement issued on May 4, 1916, by the German Imperial government promising once again to abandon unrestricted submarine warfare during World War I (1914- 1918). The pledge came about after the French ship, Sussex, was torpedoed in the English Channel, resulting in the injury of several Americans. The pledge temporarily averted U.S. participation in the war. In January 1917, Germany concluded that it could win the war if it resumed unrestricted warfare against the Allies before the United States could enter the war. Thus, the Sussex Pledge was rescinded. Resumption of unrestricted warfare by Germany and the interception of the Zimmermann Note led the U.S. Congress to declare war on Germany on April 6, 1917. See alsoChapters 8 and 9.

    T

    Taliban: An Islamist militia group that ruled large parts of Afghanistan between 1996 and 2001 and practiced an extreme Sunni Muslim political and religious ideology. Although the Taliban controlled Kabul, Afghanistan's capital, and most of the country for more than five years, the Taliban's Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan received diplomatic recognition from only three nations: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. In the areas under their control, the Taliban imposed their strict interpretation of Islam. For example, women were required to wear the all-covering burqa, they were banned from public life, denied access to health care and education, and were forbidden to laugh in a manner that could be heard by others. Windows were required to be covered so that women could not be seen from the outside. The Taliban also imposed strict Islamic justice, amputating people's hands or arms when they were accused of stealing. Taliban hit squads carefully monitored the streets, conducting brutal public beatings.

    During Taliban rule, Afghanistan was home to the international terrorist organization al Qaeda. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Mullah Omar, the Taliban leader, refused the demand of the United States to turn over Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, who claimed responsibility for the attacks. The Taliban regime was overthrown quickly after the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001, known as Operation Enduring Freedom, but many of their leaders remain at large. Most of the Taliban fled to neighboring Pakistan, where they reorganized as an insurgency movement to fight against NATO-led forces and the democratic Islamic Republic of Afghanistan that had been established in late 2001. The Taliban routinely engage in terrorist acts against the civilian population of Afghanistan. According to a report by the United Nations, the Taliban were responsible for 76 percent of civilian casualties in Afghanistan in 2009. See alsoChapters 35, 39, and 40.

    Tehran Conference (1943): The meeting of Joseph Stalin (in power 1924–1953), Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945), and Winston Churchill (1940–1945, 1951–1955), between November 28 and December 1, 1943, most of which was held at the Soviet Embassy in Tehran, Iran. It was the first World War II (1939–1945) conference among the Big Three: the Soviet Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The primary aim of the meeting was to plan the final strategies in the war against Nazi Germany and its allies, and much of the discussion focused on the opening of a second front in Western Europe. In addition, the wartime leaders discussed relations with Turkey and Iran, operations in Yugoslavia and against Japan, and the postwar settlement. They agreed that Operation Overlord, the invasion of Normandy, would be launched during May 1944; that the military staffs of the three powers should keep in close touch with each other to ensure cooperation against the enemy; and that the borders of postwar Poland would be reconfigured to meet Stalin's demands. The three leaders also tentatively agreed to form a united nations organization, and the Soviet Union agreed to declare war against Japan once Germany was defeated. See alsoChapters 14 and 15.

    Torrijos-Carter Treaties (1977): Two agreements between the United States and Panama, signed in Washington, D.C., on September 7, 1977, and abrogating the Hay-Bunau Varilla Treaty of 1903. The treaties are named after the two signers, U.S. President Jimmy Carter (1977–1981) and the Commander of Panama's National Guard, General Omar Torrijos, the de facto leader of Panama from 1968 to 1981. The treaties specified that Panama would gain control of the Panama Canal after 1999, ending U.S. control of the canal, which it had held since 1903. This first treaty, officially titled “The Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal” and commonly known as the Neutrality Treaty, declared that the United States retained the permanent right to defend the canal from any threat that might interfere with its neutral service to ships of all nations. The second treaty, titled “The Panama Canal Treaty,” provided that as of noon on December 31, 1999, Panama would assume full control of canal operations and become principally responsible for its defense. Both treaties were ratified in Panama by a two-thirds vote held on October 23, 1977. The U.S. Senate ratified the first treaty on March 16, 1978, and the second treaty on April 18 by votes of sixty-eight to thirty-two. The treaties specified a timetable for the transfer of the canal, leading to a total handover of all land and buildings in the canal area to Panama. The most immediate consequence of this treaty was that the Canal Zone ceased to exist on October 1, 1979. The final phase of the treaty was completed on December 31, 1999. On this date, the United States relinquished control of the Panama Canal and all areas in what had been the Panama Canal Zone. See alsoChapter 31.

    sanctions: In international relations, actions taken by nations or international organizations, such as the United Nations (UN), against others for political reasons, either unilaterally or multilaterally. There are several types of sanctions. Diplomatic sanctions are political measures taken to express disapproval or displeasure of a certain action through diplomacy or other political means, rather than affecting economic or military relations. Measures include limitations or cancellations of high-level government visits or expelling or withdrawing diplomatic missions. Economic sanctions can vary from imposing import duties on goods from the target nation, or blocking the export of certain goods to the target country, to a full naval blockade of a nation's ports in an effort to block specific goods, such as armaments. Two well-known examples of economic sanctions include the UN sanctions against Iraq (1990–2003) and the U.S. embargo against Cuba (1962-present). Military sanctions may range from targeted military strikes to degrade a nation's military capabilities, to an arms embargo to cut off supplies of arms. Sports sanctions are used as a way to crush morale of the general population in the target country. The only incident of sports sanctions being applied was the international sanctions against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia between 1992 and 1995, enacted by UN Resolution 757. See alsoChapters 16 and 31.

    torture: According to the United Nations Convention Against Torture (an advisory measure of the UN General Assembly), “… any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him, or a third person, information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in, or incidental to, lawful sanctions.” Torture is prohibited under international law and the domestic laws of most countries in the twenty-first century. Torture is a violation of human rights, and it is deemed to be unacceptable by Article 5 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Signatories of the Third Geneva Convention (1929) and Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) officially agree not to torture prisoners captured in armed conflicts. Torture is also prohibited by the United Nations Convention Against Torture, which has been ratified by more than 140 nations. See alsoChapters 14, 15, and 40.

    Treaty of Ghent (1814): Agreement between the United States and Great Britain which ended the War of 1812 (1812–1814). In January 1814, President James Madison (1809–1817) learned that the British were willing to conclude a treaty. Consequently, American and British negotiators met at Ghent in what is now Belgium. The Americans demanded the abandonment of impressments, recognition of the rights of neutrals, and compensation for the loss of merchant vessels. The British wanted to use a part of the American Northwest as a buffer state between Canada and the United States, large cessions of American territory, and the surrender of American fishing rights off the Canadian coast. The final treaty, however, did not mention any of these issues. It simply provided for the end of hostilities and left each side with the same territory it held before the war. Not a word was included about impressment or neutral rights. Finally, it was agreed that any disputed boundaries between Canada and the United States would be settled through arbitration. See alsoChapter 1.

    Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848): Agreement between the United States and Mexico which ended the Mexican-American War (1846–1848). Under the terms of this treaty, Mexico was forced to recognize the annexation of Texas and the Rio Grande as Texas’ southern boundary. It also ceded the provinces of California and New Mexico to the United States, which includes the present-day states of California, Nevada, and Utah; most of Arizona and New Mexico; and parts of Colorado and Wyoming. Thus, Mexico gave up nearly half of its territory. The United States agreed to pay Mexico $15 million and to assume Mexico's debts to Americans, a sum totaling about $3.25 million. After much debate, the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty by a vote of thirty-eight to fourteen. See alsoChapter 2.

    Treaty of Manila (1946): Agreement between the United States and the Philippines which granted full independence to the Philippines and relinquished American sovereignty over the islands. It was signed in Manila, the capital of the Philippines, on July 4, 1946. See alsoChapter 16.

    Treaty of Paris of 1783: Agreement between the United States and Great Britain ending the War for Independence (1775–1783). Following the American victory at Yorktown (1781), American and British representatives in Paris discussed peace terms between September and November 1782. The principle American negotiators were Benjamin Franklin, the American minister to France; John Jay, the American minister to Spain; and John Adams, the American minister to the Netherlands. Under the terms of the treaty, Britain recognized American independence, and the boundaries of the new nation were extended from Canada and the Great Lakes in the north to the Mississippi River on the west and to the thirty-first parallel and Spanish Florida to the south. In addition, Britain agreed to return Florida to Spain and gave American fishers the right to fish off the coast of Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. Both sides agreed to pay lawful debts to the other side, and the United States agreed to stop further confiscation of the property of loyalists (who had sided with the British during the war). The treaty was signed in Paris in September 1783. See alsoChapter 1.

    Treaty of Versailles (1919): Agreement between the Allies and Germany which ended World War I (1914–1918) and essentially redrew the map of Europe. The term Treaty of Versailles inaccurately came to represent the series of treaties that ended the hostilities with the Central Powers: the Treaty of St. Germaine with Austria; the Treaty of Trianon with Hungary; the treaty of Neuilly with Bulgaria; and the Treaty of Sevres with the Ottoman Empire. As a result of these peace settlements, France recovered the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine, which Germany had taken after the Franco-Prussian War (1870–1871). France also gained control of the rich coal deposits in Germany's Saar Basin for fifteen years. In the west, Germany gave up small areas to Belgium and Denmark. In the east, Germany lost large areas to the recreated Poland; included in the new Poland was a narrow strip of land along the Vistula River to the seaport of Danzig, which cut Germany in two. The new Poland also included lands formerly controlled by Austria-Hungary and Russia, and both Austria and Hungary were separated and greatly reduced in size and power. Italy received lands around the northern Adriatic Sea. Romania gained territory at the expense of Hungary, Bulgaria, and Russia. Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania were recreated out of Russian territory, even though Russia, engaged in civil war, was not represented in Paris, where representatives met from Britain, France, and the United States. Germany lost all of its overseas possessions, and the Ottoman Empire lost its Arab lands in Asia. The devastated European countries no longer possessed the unrivaled global power they had once known.

    At the insistence of President Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921), most of these areas became mandates and not possessions of the victorious powers. The mandates were to be administered by the victorious nations under the supervision of the new League of Nations, established to maintain peace and avoid future wars. The Treaty of Versailles placed huge reparations on Germany and forced Germany, Austria, and Hungary to disarm almost completely; Germany was not allowed to manufacture or obtain war materials. There were 440 articles; Article X of the League's covenant provided that member nations would “respect and preserve … against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing independence of all members….” This provision was unacceptable to a majority of Republican senators, who asserted that it would involve “entangling alliances” and drag the nation into foreign wars. Democratic-leaning Irish Catholics and German Americans also opposed the treaty, because they believed that the treaty favored the British. Despite Wilson's efforts to sway public opinion in favor of the treaty, he refused to compromise on the inclusion of the League of Nations. Thus, the U.S. Senate never ratified the Treaty of Versailles. Congress passed the Knox-Porter Resolution, which brought a formal end to hostilities between the United States and the Central Powers. It was signed into law by President Warren G. Harding (1921–1923) on July 21, 1921. See alsoChapters 9, 10, and 11.

    treaty power: The ability to conclude an accord with another sovereign state, usually concentrated in the executive authority of a government. Article II of the United States Constitution empowers the President of the United States to propose and negotiate agreements between the United States and other countries. These agreements become treaties between the United States and other countries after ratification by the United States Senate. See alsoChapters 1, 9, and 14.

    Triple Alliance: Formed in May 1882 among Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, agreement in which each member promised mutual support in the event of an attack by any two other great powers, or for Germany and Italy, an attack by France alone. At the outbreak of World War I (1914–1918), Italy refused to join its two allies, noting that the Triple Alliance was a defensive pact and that Germany and Austria-Hungary took the offensive. Later, in 1915, Italy joined the Allies against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire. See alsoChapters 8 and 9.

    Triple Entente: Alliance among Great Britain, France, and Russia formed in 1907 as a counter-weight to the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. At the outbreak of World War I (1914–1918), Italy did not join its two allies; in 1915, it joined Great Britain, France, and Russia against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire. See alsoChapters 8 and 9.

    truce: An agreement between opposing sides to cease hostilities for a specific period of time; cease fire. See alsoChapters 9 and 19.

    Truman Doctrine: Policy articulated by President Harry S. Truman (1945–1953) on March 12, 1947, pledging U.S. support of Greece and Turkey with military and economic aid to prevent those nations from falling under Soviet influence. In February 1946, George F. Kennan, an American diplomat in Moscow, sent to Truman his “Long Telegram,” in which he predicted that the Soviet Union would only respond to force and that the best way to respond to that nation's aggressive moves would be through a long-term strategy of containment; he hoped to prevent the spread of communism in Europe. In March 1947, Truman appeared before Congress and used Kennan's recommendations as the basis for what became known as the Truman Doctrine, the first in a series of containment moves by the United States. The doctrine was followed by economic restoration of Western Europe through the Marshall Plan (1947–1951) and the creation of NATO (1949) and served to buttress American Cold War policy in Europe and around the world. See alsoChapter 17.

    U

    U-boat: Anglicized version of the German U-boot, itself shorthand for unterseeboot (undersea boat), the German submarines used against Allied warships and merchant ships during World War I (1914–1918) and again in World War II (1939–1945). The primary targets of U-boats were the merchant marine bringing supplies from the United States and the British Empire to the British Isles. Germany's unrestricted use of U-boats during World War I was a major cause of U.S. entry into that conflict. See alsoChapters 8, 9, and 10.

    unconditional surrender: The complete surrender of a nation at the end of a war in which the defeated nation or party is prevented from dictating any terms once fighting ends. In the twentieth century, the most famous examples were the unconditional surrender of Germany and Japan, the leading Axis Powers at the end of World War II (1939–1945). See alsoChapters 9, 10, and 14.

    unilateral: Undertaken by one party or nation only, when a second party or nation could or should have had input. Although unilateral action usually generates a backlash of international anger and opposition, it is the least complicated foreign-policy action, requiring no diplomacy, no consensus, and no multilateral support. Supporters of American unilateralism maintain that the United States is free to act alone to protect its interests and security. See alsoChapter 35.

    United Nations (UN): International organization established after the end of World War II (1939–1945) to maintain world peace; the successor organization to the League of Nations. Late in 1944, representatives of four major Allied powers—the United States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and China—met at Dumbarton Oaks, an estate near Washington, D.C., to develop concrete proposals for a united nations. In spring 1945, representatives from more than fifty nations met in San Francisco to set up the UN, and the fifty founding members signed the charter on June 26, 1945. (Poland, which was not represented at the meeting, signed the charter later and became one of fifty-one members.) The UN officially came into existence on October 24, 1945, after the United States, Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union, China, and a majority of the signatory nations approved the charter. Today, the number of UN member states exceeds 190, each of whom has one vote in the General Assembly. The UN also includes a judicial branch, the International Court of Justice, and a peacekeeping body, the Security Council, which also can authorize military action, as well as the Secretariat, the Trusteeship Council, and the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). See alsoChapters 16 and 17.

    unrestricted submarine warfare: During wartime, the use of armed submarines to attack enemy merchant vessels without warning. This form of attack was used by German submarines, known as U-boats, during World War I (1914–1918) and World War II (1939–1945). It was a major reason for U.S. entry into World War I. During World War II, German submarines were extremely successful in the North Atlantic, sending more than eight million tons of shipping to the bottom of the sea in the first eleven months after the attack on Pearl Harbor. See alsoChapters 8, 9, and 14.

    V

    Vietnam War (1945–1975): Conflict between Communist North Vietnam and non-Communist South Vietnam, and a proxy war between the Soviet Union and the United States. More than two million troops fought in one of the most costly wars in American history. Before World War II (1939–1945), most of Southeast Asia was ruled by the French, and during the war, the Japanese occupied the area. At the end of the war, Communist leader Ho Chi Minh proclaimed Vietnam's independence; from his stronghold in the north, he led a war against the French and their Vietnamese supporters, which resulted in a French defeat in 1954. According to the Geneva Accords that ended the fighting, Vietnam was temporarily divided, pending elections. A Communist government was established in the north and a non-Communist regime in the south. When the leader of the south refused to hold the promised elections, opposition forces, the Viet Cong, began a guerrilla war against the South Vietnamese government.

    The United States had been supporting the south with military and economic aid since 1950. In 1961, President John F. Kennedy (1961–1963) sent in about sixteen thousand troops as advisers, but they had little impact on the situation. In 1965, Lyndon B. Johnson (1963–1969), with authorization from Congress under the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (1964), escalated the military action against the communists. Subsequently, the number of American troops rapidly rose to more than one-half million. Despite the increased ground fighting, the heavy U.S. bombing of the north, and the destruction of about 20 percent of the area's landscape with toxic chemicals, the north would not capitulate. After lengthy negotiations, an unsteady peace was achieved in 1973, leading to the withdrawal of most U.S. forces. In 1975, the communists captured Saigon, the South Vietnamese capital, and unified the country, and remaining U.S. personnel were evacuated hurriedly from the country.

    Domestically, the war divided the American people; antiwar protestors demonstrated against the U.S. role in Vietnam. Internationally, many viewed the fall of South Vietnam as a major defeat for the United States. Beginning in 1975, with the defeat of the United States, many political pundits and some government officials began to use the term Vietnam syndrome to describe the less interventionist and more cautious foreign policy of the nation. See alsoChapters 23 and 24.

    W

    War of 1812: Conflict between the United States and Great Britain waged from 1812 through 1814. Among the causes of the war were the Americans’ belief that the British were supplying arms and munitions to the Native Americans on the western frontier, British interference with American trade on the high seas, and the impressment of American sailors to serve on British ships. With increased tensions between the two nations, Congress declared war on Great Britain on June 19, 1812. In January 1814, upon learning that the British were willing to negotiate a treaty, President James Madison (1809–1817) sent Albert Gallatin, Henry Clay, and John Quincy Adams to Ghent, in what is today Belgium, as the American peace commissioners. The Treaty of Ghent was finally signed on December 24, 1814. The Battle of New Orleans, the final major battle of the war, which occurred on January 8, 1815, was a stunning American victory but had no effect on the war's outcome. See alsoChapters 1 and 2.

    War on Terrorism: A term used by President George W. Bush (2001–2009) following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, to describe an ongoing international military campaign to end state-supported terrorism. The so-called war began in 2001 with the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan to topple the Taliban, the fundamentalist Islamic regime that supported and sheltered al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, and continued in 2003 with the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. In an effort to reduce the power of al Qaeda and its affiliates, the war is also waged in the Philippines, the Horn of Africa, and Saharan Africa. To refer to those efforts today, the administration of President Barack Obama (2009–) replaced the term with “Overseas Contingency Operations.” See alsoChapters 35, 39, and 40.

    War for Independence (1775–1783): Waged against the British, war in which the thirteen colonies won independence from Great Britain, then the most powerful nation on earth, resulting in the establishment of the United States of America. Tensions had been increasing since 1763, when Great Britain began imposing new and tighter restrictions on the colonies. In particular, the colonists objected to the passage of new tax laws without having representation in the British Parliament in London. On April 19, 1775, fighting broke out in the towns of Lexington and Concord in the Massachusetts colony. In July 1776, the Second Continental Congress, the governing body of the united colonies, issued a formal declaration of independence. A 1777 American victory at the Battle of Saratoga, in New York, brought France into the war as America's ally. The final major battle occurred in 1781 at Yorktown, Virginia, where American and French troops defeated the British and the French fleet prevented British naval units from reinforcing its army. The Treaty of Paris of 1783, signed in September of that year, officially ended the war. See alsoChapters 1 and 4.

    War Powers Act (1973): Resolution passed by Congress, declaring its authority to share with the president decisions about declaring war and military involvements. Under the terms of this act, the president must report to Congress within forty-eight hours after committing forces to combat abroad, explaining the circumstances of the commitment. If Congress does not approve the action within sixty to ninety days, the president is required to withdraw the troops. The act was passed over the veto of President Richard M. Nixon (1969–1974), who believed it was unconstitutional on the grounds that the president is commander in chief of the armed forces. Since the act's passage, all presidents have complied with its terms. See alsoChapters 23 and 35.

    war reparations: Payment required from a defeated nation to make amends for loss of life and property damages during wartime. For example, the 1919 Treaty of Versailles obligated Germany to pay huge war reparations, ultimately set at the equivalent of $33 billion. Germany, however, impoverished by the cost of World War I (1914–1918), and despite financial adjustments made during the 1920s, could not pay. Therefore, in 1931, under the recommendation of President Herbert Hoover (1929–1933), the Allies agreed to suspend Germany's reparation payments, canceling them at the 1932 Lausanne Conference. The harsh reparations imposed on Germany are cited often as a factor in the rise of Adolf Hitler (in power 1933–1945). See alsoChapters 9 and 13.

    Washington Consensus: Term used to describe several policies outlined by economist John Williamson in 1989 in order to provide a set of directions for nations in need of economic assistance. Neither new nor novel, the ideas included in the Washington Consensus were a distillation of advice commonly provided by the World Bank, the U.S. Treasury, the International Monetary Fund, and other lending organizations. The term has come to be used derisively by critics of free market basics. See alsoChapter 31.

    weapons of mass destruction (WMDs): Any weapon that can cause widespread loss of life and catastrophic damage to infrastructure. During the Cold War era, the term primarily referred to nuclear weapons, but today it also refers to chemical, biological, and radiological weaponry. In 2003, President George W. Bush (2001–2009) insisted that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction, thus posing a threat to Iraq's neighbors and the United States. After the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, however, no WMDs were found to support the president's and his advisers’ claims and faulty intelligence. In the United States, indictments and convictions have been obtained for possession and use of WMDs, such as shoe bombs, pipe bombs, and truck bombs. In the 2006 trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the “20th hijacker” in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the judge included aircraft used as missiles as WMDs and sentenced Moussaoui to life without parole. See alsoChapter 35.

    Webster-Ashburton Treaty (1842): Agreement reached between the United States and Great Britain that established a permanent boundary between Maine and Canada. This boundary had been in dispute since the signing of the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which ended the War for Independence (1775–1783). The outbreak of fighting between Maine settlers and trappers and Canadian lumberjacks in the late 1830s made it clear that a resolution was needed to avoid war. The treaty, negotiated by Secretary of State Daniel Webster and Alexander Baring (also known as Lord Ashburton, the British minister to the United States), resulted in the United States’ receiving about seven thousand square miles of the disputed area and Britain's receiving about five thousand square miles. Also, the treaty established a fixed boundary west from Lake Superior to the Lake of the Woods. See alsoChapter 2.

    World Bank: Established in 1944, international organization that serves as a source for economic and technical assistance to developing nations. Not a bank in the traditional sense, it is made up of two bodies, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IRBD) and the International Development Association (IDA), which are owned by the 187 member countries. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., and charged with promoting sustainable economic development worldwide, the bank provides low-interest loans, interest-free credits, and grants for a wide array of purposes including health and education, infrastructure, and natural resource management. It also has evolved into an instrument that imposes rules and reforms on nations suffering from economic problems such as debt. See alsoChapters 15 and 16.

    World Court: Term used to refer to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), as the International Criminal Court (ICC), and the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), all of which are located at The Hague in the Netherlands. The ICJ was established in 1945 by the UN Charter and is the successor to the Permanent Court of International Justice, which had been established in 1922 and attached to the League of Nations. The main purpose of the ICJ, as the primary judicial organ of the United Nations (UN), is to settle legal disputes submitted by member nations and to provide opinions on legal questions submitted by the UN General Assembly and certain other international agencies. The ICC is a permanent tribunal established in 2002 to prosecute individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression. The PCA, established in 1899, is an administrative organization with the means to arbitrate international disputes, including disagreements over treaties, maritime and territorial boundaries, trade matters, and human rights. See alsoChapters 35 and 40.

    World War I (1914–1918): Global conflict that launched a new era of total war that was ignited in June 1914 when a Serbian nationalist assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, as well as his pregnant wife. The incident occurred in Sarajevo, the capital of the Austrian province of Bosnia. At the time, few expected a major war to result, but the incident sparked worldwide conflagration. On July 23, Austria-Hungary sent an ultimatum to Serbia that, if accepted, would have humiliated Serbia and given Austria-Hungary dominance in the Balkans. Germany gave Austria-Hungary carte blanche, with a promise of full support. In turn, Russia informed Serbia of its support. Serbia rejected the ultimatum, and on July 28, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia and found itself at war with Russia as well. France backed Russia, and Germany fulfilled its promise by supporting Austria-Hungary. When Germany invaded Belgium in order to attack France, Great Britain joined France and Russia. Later, Italy joined the war against Germany and Austria-Hungary. Fighting raged in Europe and spread across the globe as the colonies of the belligerents became involved.

    By 1917, the war in Europe reached a stalemate, settling into desperate trench warfare. To keep war material from reaching Britain, Germany implemented unrestricted submarine warfare, a move that caused the loss of innocent civilians, including Americans. Although protests from President Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921) led Germany to abandon its policy for a time, in early 1917, the Imperial German government resumed unrestricted submarine warfare in the hope of victory before the United States would enter the war. This resumption, plus the publication of the so-called Zimmermann Note, in which Germany encouraged Mexico to make war on the United States in return for lands lost in the Mexican War (1846–1848), led to Congress’ declaring war on Germany on April 6, 1917.

    The arrival of American troops turned the tide of the war in favor of the Allies. In November 1918, the disillusioned German people forced their ruler, Kaiser Wilhelm II (in power 1888–1918), to abdicate and flee to the Netherlands. The armistice signed on November 11, 1918, marked the end of the fighting, and the war officially ended with the Treaty of Versailles (1919). The Russian, Ottoman, and Austro-Hungarian empires were replaced by a number of smaller states, and the United States took on its new role as a global power. See alsoChapters 8, 9, and 10.

    World War II (1939–1945): The most extensive global conflict in history, waged in Europe, Asia, and Africa, which began with the German invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939. During the 1930s, Japan, Italy, and Germany became increasingly aggressive, demanding territory and building up of their respective militaries. As soon as Adolf Hitler took power in 1933, he began to rearm Germany in spite of the limitations imposed on German armed forces by the Treaty of Versailles (1919). He reorganized Germany into a military state in which all citizens were “coordinated” to fit the Nazi military machine. In 1936, he moved German troops into the demilitarized zones of the Rhineland and, when France and Great Britain did not react, he kept troops there. A year earlier, Italian troops under the Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini (in power 1922–1943) had invaded Ethiopia, and while the League of Nations protested ineffectually, the Italian troops easily conquered the weak African nation. In 1931, Japan took over the northern Chinese province of Manchuria and established the puppet state of Manchukuo, and in July 1937, Japanese troops again invaded northern China. Imperial Japan aimed to control eastern Asia from Korea to the East Indies and the entire western Pacific area, to create a “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.” By the late 1930s, the nations of Germany, Italy, and Japan had formed a military alliance, becoming known as the Axis powers. In Europe, Hitler demanded the Sudetenland, a region of Czechoslovakia. To avoid war, France and Great Britain appeased Hitler in the infamous Munich Pact of 1938. The following spring, Germany annexed all of Czechoslovakia. In 1939, Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Ribbontrop-Molotov Pact, an understanding in which the two nations agreed not to attack each other and divide Poland between them.

    Temporarily assured of Soviet neutrality, Hitler invaded Poland on September 1, 1939. France and Britain declared war on Germany on September 3. Belgium, the Netherlands, France, Denmark, and Norway quickly succumbed to Nazi armies.

    In the United States, public opinion was strongly against intervening in the war. However, President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945) realized that Hitler's ambitions knew no bounds and, if not stopped, Germany would someday attack the United States. As a result, Roosevelt sought to make the United States “an arsenal of democracy” and pushed for measures “short of war” to prepare the nation, including the first peacetime draft and the 1941 Lend-Lease Act to supply materiel to the Allies. In June 1941, Nazi armies invaded the Soviet Union, violating the Ribbontrop-Molotov Pact and bringing the Soviet Union into the war. On the early morning of December 7, 1941, the Empire of Japan launched an attack on the U.S. base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; the U. S. Congress declared war on Japan the next day. Three days later, on December 11, Germany and Italy declared war on the United States. Throughout most of 1942, the Axis powers easily achieved new victories: Japan in the Pacific, Germany in the Soviet Union and southeastern Europe, and Germany and Italy in North Africa. Then in November 1942, Britain and the United States invaded North Africa, pushing back the Axis troops. In 1943, Allied troops moved north on the Italian peninsula, and in September of that year, Italy surrendered unconditionally. On June 6, 1944, D-Day, American, British, and Canadian troops landed on the Normandy coast of France, thus beginning a push across France to the German capital of Berlin. As Allied forces moved east, Soviet troops moved west; soldiers from the two armies met in Germany in late April 1945, and Germany surrendered unconditionally on May 8. In the Pacific, war still raged and the Japanese refused to surrender.

    In August 1945, President Harry S. Truman (1945–1953), who assumed the presidency after Roosevelt's death on April 12, authorized the dropping of the world's first atomic bombs on Japan. On August 6, the Enola Gay, a B-29 bomber, dropped the first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima; three days later, a second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. The two bombs killed more than 100,000 Japanese and permanently injured thousands more. Still, the Japanese military refused to capitulate. The Emperor Hirohito forced the issue and insisted on an immediate surrender to avoid more bloodshed. The Empire of Japan surrendered unconditionally on August 14. See alsoChapters 14 and 15.

    WTO: The only global international organization dealing with the rules of trade between nations. The goal of the World Trade Organization is to help producers of goods and services, exporters, and importers conduct business. Member nations, more than one hundred fifty, abide by a complex set of trade agreements that are mutually beneficial. The WTO came into being in 1995; it is the successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which had been established in the wake of World War II. Since 1999, meetings of the WTO have sparked widespread, and often violent, protests against free trade and globalization. See alsoChapters 31 and 34.

    X

    XYZ Affair: Diplomatic affront to the United States committed by the Duc de Talleyrand, the French foreign minister, and his agents. The French government viewed the Jay Treaty (1794) with Great Britain as a repudiation of the 1778 Franco-American alliance. As a result, the French ordered the seizure of American ships bound for British ports. In response, many members of the pro-British Federalist Party demanded war against France. In 1797, determined to keep the nation out of war, President John Adams (1797–1801) sent a special commission, consisting of Charles C. Pinckney, John Marshall, and Elbridge Gerry, to negotiate with the French government. However, Talleyrand's agents refused to meet with the American delegation unless assured that the United States would adopt a friendlier attitude toward France. Unofficially, they also demanded a bribe of $240,000. After months of wrangling, the American mission gave up. Adams, when reporting the incident to Congress, referred to the French agents as Messieurs X, Y, and Z and declared that he would “never send another minister to France without assurances that he will be received, respected, and honored as the representative of a free, powerful, and independent nation.” The incident became known as the XYZ Affair and sparked indignation across the United States. See alsoChapter 1.

    Y

    Yalta Conference (1945): Meeting of the leaders of the Allied powers in February 1945, when the defeat of Germany seemed imminent. Held in the Crimean resort of Yalta, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (1940–1945, 1951–1955), Soviet leader Joseph Stalin (in power 1924–1953), and President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945), the “Big Three,” tried to arrive at basic arrangements for the postwar world. Often referred to as the beginning of the Cold War, the conference was instrumental in the secret division of the continent and other regions into competing spheres of influence: the Western bloc (led by the United States) and the Eastern bloc (led by the Soviet Union). Roosevelt pressed for Soviet intervention in the war against Japan. The Soviet Union was to have dominance in Mongolia and occupy the Kurile Islands north of Japan. The Soviet Union was allotted eastern Poland, which it already held, while Poland, as compensation, was to receive land from Germany. In the European lands formerly conquered by Germany, new governments were to be established through free elections under the auspices of the three powers. Germany was to be divided into military zones and occupied by the armed forces of the major Allied nations, Great Britain, France, the United States, and the Soviet Union. See alsoChapters 14 and 15.

    yellow journalism: A type of press that presents little or no well-researched news, often using attention-grabbing headlines and wild exaggeration. Yellow journalism is often opinion masquerading as fact. The term comes from an 1890s comic, “Hogan's Alley,” which featured a character, dressed in yellow, known as the “yellow kid” and was published by Joseph Pulitzer in the New York World. Rival William Randolph Hearst, who published the New York Journal, was determined to compete; he hired away the “Hogan's Alley” cartoonist. In response, Pulitzer hired another artist to draw a second “yellow kid.” Quickly, the sensationalist stories published by the opposing newspapers became known as “yellow journalism.” The yellow journalism of New York's rival newspapers was a key factor leading to the Spanish-American War (1898). See alsoChapter 6.

    Z

    Zimmermann Note: A diplomatic proposal by the German Imperial government to Mexico to make war against the United States. In January 1917, British cryptographers deciphered a telegram from the German foreign minister Arthur Zimmermann to the German minister to Mexico, Heinrich von Eckhardt, offering U.S. territory, the states of Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico, to Mexico in return for joining the German cause. Mexico declined the proposal, but the publication of the telegram enraged the American public and helped draw the United States into World War I (1914–1917). See alsoChapters 8 and 9.

    Chapter Acronyms and Initialisms

    AAA: Agricultural Adjustment Act [Chapter 12]

    ABM: Anti-Ballistic Missile System [Chapter 25]

    AC: Advisory Council [Chapter 14]

    ACC: Allied Control Commission [Chapter 14]

    ACRI: African Crisis Response Initiative [Chapter 37]

    ACT: Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapy [Chapter 37]

    AFC: America First Committee [Chapter 13]

    AFL-CIO: American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations [Chapter 34]

    AFRICOM: African Command [Chapter 37]

    AGOA: African Growth and Opportunity Act [Chapter 37]

    AIOC: Anglo-Iranian Oil Company [Chapter 18]

    AMG: Allied Military Government [Chapter 14]

    ANC: African National Congress [Chapter 21]

    ANZUS: Australia, New Zealand, and United States Treaty [Chapter 19]

    APOC: Anglo-Persian Oil Company [Chapter 18]

    ARAMCO: Arabian-American Oil Company [Chapter 18]

    ARVN: Army of the Republic of Vietnam [Chapter 23]

    ASEAN: Association of Southeast Asian Nations [Chapters 21 and 36]

    AU: African Union [Chapter 37]

    CAAA: Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act [Chapter 21]

    CAFTA: Central American Free Trade Agreement [Chapter 31]

    CBD: Convention on Biological Diversity [Chapter 32]

    CBI: Caribbean Basin Initiative [Chapter 31]

    CCC: Civilian Conservation Corps [Chapters 12 and 16]

    CCP: Communist Chinese Party [Chapter 36]

    CDAAA: Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies [Chapter 15]

    CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Chapter 37] CFCs: Chlorofluorocarbons [Chapter 32]

    CHAI: Clinton Health Access Initiative [Chapter 37]

    CIA: Central Intelligence Agency [Chapters 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 27, 29, 35, 38, and 39]

    CJTF: Combined Joint Task Forces [Chapter 33]

    CJTF-HOA: Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa [Chapter 37]

    CNAS: Center for a New American Security [Chapter 36]

    COMECON: Council for Economic Assistance [Chapter 29]

    Comintern: Communist International [Chapter 11]

    CPA: Comprehensive Peace Agreement [Chapter 37]

    CPSU: Communist Party of the Soviet Union [Chapter 25]

    CPV: Chinese People's Volunteers [Chapter 19]

    CSA: Confederate States of America [Chapter 3]

    CSCE: Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe [Chapter 25]

    DMZ: Demilitarized Zone [Chapter19]

    DOD: Department of Defense [Chapter 32]

    DOS: Department of State [Chapter 4]

    DPRK: Democratic People's Republic of Korea [Chapters 19 and 27]

    DRC: Democratic Republic of Congo [Chapter 37]

    DRV: Democratic Republic of Vietnam [Chapter 23]

    EAC: European Advisory Commission [Chapter 14]

    EAM: National Liberation Front (Greece) [Chapter 16]

    ECLA: Economic Commission for Latin America [Chapter 22]

    ERP: European Recovery Program [Chapter 32]

    ESDI: European Security and Defense Identity [Chapter 33]

    ESDP: European Security and Defense Policy [Chapter 33]

    EU: European Union [Chapters 37, 38, and 39]

    FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation [Chapters 17 and 35]

    FCDA: Federal Civil Defense Administration [Chapter 20]

    FEC: French Expeditionary Corps [Chapter 23]

    FTF: Feed the Future [Chapter 37]

    GATT: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade [Chapter 34]

    GDP: Gross Domestic Product [Chapters 29, 36, and 37]

    GNP: Gross National Product [Chapters 12 and 24]

    HIV/AIDS: Human Immuno-deficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome [Chapter 37]

    HUAC: House Un-American Activities Committee [Chapter 17]

    ICBMs: Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles [Chapters 20 and 30]

    ICC: International Criminal Court [Chapter 37]

    IDF: Israel Defense Forces [Chapters 26 and 38]

    IEDs: Improvised Explosive Devices [Chapter 40]

    IFOR: Implementation Force [Chapter 33]

    IGOs: International Governmental Organizations [Chapter 39]

    IMF: International Monetary Fund [Chapters 16, 21, 36, and 37]

    INF: Intermediate Nuclear Forces [Chapters 29 and 30]

    INGOs: International Non-Governmental Organizations [Chapter 39]

    IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Chapter 32]

    ISAF: International Security Assistance Force [Chapter 33]

    ITT: International Telephone and Telegraph [Chapter 22]

    IUCN: International Union for the Conservation of Nature [Chapter 32]

    JCS: Joint Chiefs of Staff [Chapters 19 and 23]

    KANU: Kenya African National Union [Chapter 37]

    KFOR: Kosovo Force [Chapter 33]

    KLA: Kosovo Liberation Army [Chapter 33]

    KMAG: Korean Military Advisory Group [Chapter 19]

    KPA: Korean People's Army [Chapter 19]

    LAFTA: Latin America Free Trade Area [Chapter 31]

    LEP: League to Enforce Peace [Chapter 8]

    MAD: Mutually Assured Destruction [Chapters 16, 20, 25, and 29]

    MAP: Membership Action Plan [Chapter 33]

    MCC: Millennium Challenge Corporation [Chapter 37]

    MDC: Movement for Democratic Change [Chapter 37]

    MFN: Most Favored Nation [Chapter 12]

    MIRV: Multiple Independently Targeted Re-Entry Vehicle [Chapter 25]

    MNR: Nationalist Revolutionary Movement [Chapter 22]

    MONUSCO: United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo [Chapter 37]

    MPLA: Movement for the Liberation of Angola [Chapter 25]

    NAACP: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People [Chapter 10]

    NAFTA: North American Free Trade Agreement [Chapters 31 and 34]

    NAM: Non-Aligned Movement [Chapter 21]

    NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration [Chapter 32]

    NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization [Chapters 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 33, 34, 37, 39, and 40]

    NGOs: Non-Governmental Organizations [Chapters 30, 32, and 37]

    NIRA: National Industrial Recovery Act [Chapter 12]

    NLF: National Liberation Front [Chapters 21 and 23]

    NMD: National Missile Defense [Chapter 34]

    NNSC: Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission [Chapter 19]

    NORAD: North American Aerospace Defense Command [Chapter 41]

    NPT: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [Chapter 25]

    NRA: National Recovery Administration [Chapter 12]

    NSC: National Security Council [Chapters 16, 17, 19, 29, 39, and 40]

    NSC-68: National Security Council Report 68 [Chapters 17, 20, 23, and 24]

    NSD 26: National Security Directive 26 [Chapter 27]

    NSDD 138: National Security Decision Directive [Chapter 27]

    NSL: National Security League [Chapter 8]

    NTBT: Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty [Chapter 25]

    NTD: Neglected Tropical Disease Initiative [Chapter 37]

    OAS: Organization of American States [Chapters 22 and 40]

    OAU: Organization of African Unity [Chapter 21]

    OPEC: Organization of Petroleum Exporting Companies [Chapters 21 and 26]

    OSCE: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [Chapter 33]

    PA: Palestinian Authority [Chapter 38]

    PARP: PfP Planning and Review Process [Chapter 33]

    PCA: Permanent Court of Arbitration [Chapter 41]

    PDBs: Presidential Daily Briefs [Chapter 35]

    PDPA: People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan [Chapter 25]

    PEPFAR: President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief [Chapter 37]

    PFLP-GC: Palestinian Front for the Liberation of Palestine—General Command [Chapter 27]

    PfP: Partnership for Peace [Chapter 33]

    PKI: Communist Party of Indonesia [Chapter 21]

    PLO: Palestine Liberation Organization [Chapters 18, 26, 27, and 38]

    PMI: President's Malaria Initiative [Chapter 37]

    PNW: Prevention of Nuclear War agreement [Chapter 25]

    POWs: Prisoners of War [Chapters 19 and 23]

    PRC: People's Republic of China [Chapters 17, 19, 21, 25, 34, and 36]

    PWA: Public Works Administration [Chapter 12]

    QDDR: Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review [Chapter 39]

    ROC: Republic of China [Chapter 21]

    ROK: Republic of Korea [Chapters 19 and 27]

    RTA: Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act [Chapter 12]

    RVN: Republic of Vietnam [Chapter 23]

    SACEUR: Supreme Allied Commander Europe [Chapter 33]

    SALT I: Strategic Arms Limitations Treaty [Chapters 25 and 30]

    SALT II: Strategic Arms Limitation Talks [Chapters 25 and 30]

    SCAP: Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers [Chapter 16]

    SDI: Strategic Defense Initiative [Chapters 29 and 30]

    SDS: Students for a Democratic Society [Chapter 23]

    SEATO: Southeast Asia Treaty Organization [Chapters 21 and 27]

    SED: Strategic and Economic Dialogue [Chapter 36]

    SFOR: Stabilization Force [Chapter 33]

    SLBM: Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles [Chapter 20]

    START: Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty [Chapter 29]

    SVN: State of Vietnam [Chapter 23]

    TVA: Tennessee Valley Authority [Chapter 12, 32]

    UFCO: United Fruit Company [Chapter 22]

    UN 242: United Nations Resolution 242 [Chapter 26]

    UN: United Nations [Chapters 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 29, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40]

    UNC: United Nations Command [Chapter 19]

    UNEF: United Nations Emergency Force [Chapter 26]

    UNEP: United Nations Environment Programme [Chapter 32]

    UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [Chapters 27 and 37]

    UNFCCC: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change [Chapter 32]

    UNHCR: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees [Chapter 37]

    UNPROFOR: United Nations Protection Force [Chapter 33]

    UNRRA: United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Agency [Chapter 16]

    USAID: United States Agency for International Development [Chapters 32, 37]

    USAMGIK: U.S. Army Military Government in Korea [Chapter 19]

    USIA: U.S. Information Agency [Chapter 40]

    WEU: Western European Union [Chapter 33]

    WHO: World Health Organization [Chapters 32, 37, and 39]

    WMDs: Weapons of Mass Destruction [Chapters 34, 35, and 38]

    WMO: World Meteorological Organization [Chapter 32]

    WTO: World Trade Organization [Chapters 31 and 34]

    Bibliography

    Part I: The Development and Growth of American Foreign Policy
    Adams, EphraimD.Great Britain and the American Civil War. 2 vols. New York: Longmans, 1925.
    Adams, Henry. History of the United States of America during the Administrations of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison [1889–1891]. 2 vols. New York: Library of America, 1986.
    Adams, WilliamHoward. Gouverneur Morris: An Independent Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.
    Adelman, Jeremy, and StephenAron. “From Borderlands to Borders: Empires, Nation-States, and the Peoples in between in North American History.” In American Historical Review104, no. 3 (1999): 814–41.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2650990
    Adickes, SandraE.Sisters, Not Demons: The Influence of British Suffragists of the American Suffrage Movement.” In Women's History Review11, no. 4 (2002): 675–90.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09612020200200672
    Alonso, HarrietHyman. Peace as a Women's Issue: A History of the U.S. Movement for World Peace and Women's Rights. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1993.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/maghis/8.3.20
    Ammon, Harry. The Genet Mission. New York: W. W. Norton, 1973.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1894343
    Ammon, Harry. James Monroe: The Quest for National Identity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1921354
    Anderson, Stuart. Race and Rapprochement: Anglo-Saxonism and Anglo-American Relations, 1895–1904. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1981.
    Armstrong, WilliamM.E. L. Godkin and American Foreign Policy, 1865–1900. New York: Bookman, 1957.
    Baker, Paula. “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society, 1780–1920.” In American Historical Review89, no. 3 (1984): 620–47.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1856119
    Barnby, H.G.The Prisoners of Algiers: An Account of the Forgotten American-Algerian War 1785–1797. New York: Oxford University Press, 1966.
    Barney, WilliamL.The Passage of the Republic: An Interdisciplinary History of Nineteenth-Century America. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1987.
    Beckert, Sven. “Emancipation and Empire: Reconstructing the Worldwide Web of Cotton Production in the Age of the American Civil War.” In American Historical Review109, no. 5 (2004): 1405–38.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/530931
    Bederman, Gail. Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1992-52-5
    Beirne, FrancisJ.The War of 1812. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1949.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1846205
    Beisner, RobertL.From the Old Diplomacy to the New, 1865–1900. Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson, 1986.
    Bemis, SamuelFlagg. The Diplomacy of the American Revolution.
    #1
    Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1957.
    Bemis, SamuelFlagg. Jay's Treaty: A Study of Commerce and Diplomacy.
    #1
    New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1962.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1838540
    Bemis, SamuelFlagg. John Quincy Adams and the Foundations of American Foreign Policy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1949.
    Bemis, SamuelFlagg. Pinckney's Treaty: America's Advantage from Europe's Distress, 1783–1800.
    #1
    New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1960.
    Ben-Atar, DoronS.The Origins of Jeffersonian Commerical Policy and Diplomacy. New York: St. Martin's, 1993.
    Bender, Thomas. A Nation among Nations: America's Place in World History. New York: Hill & Wang, 2006.
    Bishel, WilliamV.Fall from Grace: U.S. Business Interests versus U.S. Diplomatic Interests in Peru, 1885–1890.” In Diplomatic History20, no. 2 (1996): 163–83.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1996.tb00621.x
    Black, Jeremy. European International Relations 1648–1815. New York: Palgrave, 2002.
    Blackett, RichardJ.M.Divided Hearts: Britain and the American Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001.
    Blake, NelsonM.The Olney-Pauncefote Treaty of 1897.” In American Historical Review50, no. 2 (1945): 228–43.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1842352
    Blondheim, Menahem. News over the Wires: The Telegraph and the Flow of Public Information in America, 1844–1897. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
    Bock, CarlH.Prelude to Tragedy: The Negotiation and Breakdown of the Tripartite Convention of London, October 31, 1861. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1966.
    Bogue, MargaretBeatti. “To Save the Fish: Canada, the United States, the Great Lakes, and the Joint Commission of 1892.” In Journal of American History79, no. 4 (1993): 1429–54.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2080211
    Boisseau, T.J.White Queens at the Chicago World's Fair, 1893: New Womanhood in the Service of Class, Race, and Nation.” In Gender & History12, no. 1 (2000): 33–81.
    Bolkhovitinov, NikolaiN.Russia and the American Revolution. C.JaySmith, trans. Tallahassee, FL: Diplomatic Press, 1976.
    Bowman, AlbertHall. The Struggle for Neutrality: Franco-American Diplomacy during the Federalist Era. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1974.
    Brant, Irving. James Madison. 6 vols. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1941–1961.
    Brauer, KinleyJ.The United States and British Imperial Expansion, 1815–60.” In Diplomatic History12, no. 1 (1988): 19–37.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1988.tb00027.x
    Brawley, MarkR.Liberal Leadership: Great Powers and Their Challengers in Peace and War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900018382
    Brecher, FrankW.Negotiating the Louisiana Purchase: Robert Livingston's Mission to France, 1801–1804. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2006.
    Brecher, FrankW.Securing American Independence: John Jay and the French Alliance. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.
    Brown, GordonS.Toussaint's Clause: The Founding Fathers and the Haitian Revolution. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press, 2005.
    Brown, RalphA.The Presidency of John Adams. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1975.
    Brown, RogerHamilton. The Republic in Peril: 1812. New York: W. W. Norton, 1971.
    Butler, Leslie. Critical Americans: Victorian Intellectuals and Transatlantic Liberal Reform. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.
    Calhoun, CharlesW.Rehearsal for Anti-Imperialism: The Second Cleveland Administration's Attempt to Withdraw from Samoa, 1893–1895.” In Historian48, no. 2 (1986): 209–24.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1986.tb00690.x
    Campbell, CharlesSoutter. “The Anglo-American Crisis in the Bering Sea, 1890–1891.” In Mississippi Valley Historical Review48, no. 3 (1961): 393–414.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1891985
    Campbell, CharlesSoutter. From Revolution to Rapprochement: The United States and Great Britain, 1783–1900. New York: Wiley, 1974.
    Campbell, CharlesSoutter. The Transformation of American Foreign Relations, 1865–1900. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.
    Campbell, DuncanA.English Public Opinion and the American Civil War. Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK; Rochester, NY: Royal Historical Society/Boydell, 2003.
    Carrigan, WilliamD., and CliveWebb. “The Lynching of Persons of Mexican Origin or Descent in the United States, 1838–1928.” In Journal of Social History37, no. 2 (2003): 411–38.http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2003.0169
    Carroll, CharlesGriffin. The United States and the Disruption of the Spanish Empire 1810–1822: A Study of the Relations of the United States with Spain and with the Rebel Spanish Colonies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1937.
    Carroll, DanielB.Henri Mercier and the American Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3002-1_9
    Case, LynnM., and WarrenF.Spencer. The United States and France: Civil War Diplomacy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2205930
    Cassell, FrankA.The Columbian Exposition of 1893 and United States Diplomacy in Latin America.” In Mid America67, no. 3 (1985): 109–24.
    Castle, AlfredL.Tentative Empire: Walter Q. Gresham, U.S. Foreign Policy, and Hawai'i, 1893–1895.” In Hawaiian Journal of History, no. 29 (1995): 83–96.
    Casto, WilliamR.Foreign Affairs and the Constitution in Age of Fighting Sail. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2006.
    Chambers, JohnWhiteclay. “The American Debate over Modern War, 1870–1914.” In Anticipating Total War: The German and American Experiences, 1871–1914, ManfredF.Boemeke, RogerChickering, and StigFörster, eds. 241–80. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
    Chang, GordonH.Whose ‘Barbarism’? Whose ‘Treachery’? Race and Civilization in the Unknown United States-Korea War of 1871.” In Journal of American History89, no. 4 (2003): 1331–65.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3092545
    Chavez, ThomasE.Spain and the Independence of the United States: An Intrinsic Gift. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2002.
    Chin, CarolC.Beneficent Imperialists: American Women Missionaries in China at the Turn of the Twentieth Century.” In Diplomatic History27, no. 3 (2003): 327–52.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7709.00356
    Claussen, CathrynL.Gendered Merit: Women and the Merit Concept in Federal Employment, 1864–1944.” In American Journal of Legal History40, no. 3 (1996): 229–52.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/845621
    Colby, JasonM.Race, Empire, and New England Capital in the Caribbean, 1890–1930.” In Massachusetts Historical Review, no. 11 (2009): 1–25.
    Coles, HarryL.The War of 1812. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2206849
    Combs, JeraldA.The Jay Treaty: Political Battleground of the Founding Fathers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970.
    Conn, Steven. “An Epistemology for Empire: The Philadelphia Commercial Museum, 1893–1926.” In Diplomatic History22, no. 4 (1998): 533–63.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0145-2096.00138
    Cook, Adrian. The Alabama Claims: American Politics and Anglo-American Relations, 1865–1872. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.1966.tb00452.x
    Cooper, JerryM.The Rise of the National Guard: The Evolution of the American Militia, 1865–1920. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1998.
    Cox, LaWanda. Lincoln and Black Freedom: A Study in Presidential Leadership. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1981.
    Crapol, EdwardP.America for Americans: Economic Nationalism and Anglophobia in the Late Nineteenth Century. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1973.http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2002.320032
    Crapol, EdwardP.Coming to Terms with Empire: The Historiography of Late-Nineteenth-Century American Foreign Relations.” In Diplomatic History, no. 16 (Fall 1992): 573–97.
    Crapol, EdwardP.James G. Blaine: Architect of Empire. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 2000.
    Crapol, EdwardP.John Tyler: The Accidental President. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3123944
    Crook, D.P.Diplomacy during the Civil War. New York: Wiley, 1975.
    Crook, D.P.The North, the South, and the Powers, 1861–1865. New York: Wiley, 1974.
    Cusick, JamesG.The Other War of 1812: The Patriot War and the American Invasion of Spanish East Florida. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2003.
    D'Agostino, Peter. “Craniums, Criminals, and the ‘Cursed Race’: Italian Anthropology in American Racial Thought.” In Comparative Studies in Society and History44, no. 2 (2002): 319–43.
    Dangerfield, George. Chancellor Robert R. Livingston of New York, 1746–1813. New York: Harcourt, 1960.
    DeConde, Alexander. Entangling Alliance: Politics and Diplomacy under George Washington. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1958.
    DeConde, Alexander. The Quasi-War: The Politics and Diplomacy of the Undeclared War with France, 1797–1801. New York: Charles Scribner's and Sons, 1966.
    DeConde, Alexander. This Affair of Louisiana. New York: Charles Scribner's and Sons, 1976.
    DeLay, Brian. War of a Thousand Deserts: Indian Raids and the U.S.-Mexican War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.
    Downs, JacquesM.The Golden Ghetto: The American Commercial Community at Canton and the Shaping of American China Policy. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 1997.
    Dull, JonathanR.A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.
    Dull, JonathanR.Franklin the Diplomat: The French Mission. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1982.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1006441
    Eckes, AlfredE., Jr., and ThomasW.Zeiler. Globalization and the American Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    Edling, MaxM.‘So Immense a Power in the Affairs of War’: Alexander Hamilton and the Restoration of Public Credit.” In William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 64, no. 2 (April 2007): 285–326.
    Edmunds, R.David. Tecumseh and the Quest for Indian Leadership. Boston: Little, Brown, 1984.
    Egan, CliffordL.Neither Peace nor War: Franco-American Relations, 1803–1812. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1983.
    Egnal, Marc. A Mighty Empire: The Origins of the American Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.
    Elkins, Stanley, and EricMcKitrick. The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195093810.001.0001
    Endy, Christopher. “Travel and World Power: Americans in Europe, 1890–1917.” In Diplomatic History22, no. 4 (1998): 565–94.
    Ernst, Robert. Rufus King: American Federalist. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1968.
    Estes, Todd. The Jay Treaty Debate, Public Opinion and the Evolution of Early American Political Culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2006.
    Ettinger, Patrick. “‘We Sometimes Wonder What They Will Spring on Us Next’: Immigrants and Border Enforcement in the American West, 1882–1930.” In Western Historical Quarterly37, no. 2 (2006): 159–81.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25443330
    Faust, DrewG.This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008.
    Ferris, NormanB.Desperate Diplomacy: William H. Seward's Foreign Policy, 1861. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1976.
    Ferris, NormanB.The Trent Affair: A Diplomatic Crisis. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1977.http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cwh.1960.0014
    Fiege, Mark. Irrigated Eden: The Making of an Agricultural Landscape in the American West. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000.
    Field, JamesA., Jr.America and the Mediterranean World 1776–1882. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.
    Flexner, JamesThomas. George Washington. 4 vols. Boston: Little, Brown, 1965–1972.
    Foos, Paul. A Short, Offhand, Killing Affair: Soldiers and Social Conflict during the Mexican-American War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.
    Frank, Alison. “The Petroleum War of 1910: Standard Oil, Austria, and the Limits of the Multinational Corporation.” In American Historical Review114, no. 1 (2009): 16–41.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ahr.114.1.16
    Franklin, JohnHope. The Emancipation Proclamation. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1963.
    Freeman, DouglasSouthall. George Washington. 7 vols. New York: Charles Scribner's and Sons, 1948–1957.
    Fry, JosephA.Dixie Looks Abroad: The South and U.S. Foreign Relations, 1789–1973. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2002.
    Fry, JosephA.Phases of Empire: Late Nineteenth-Century U.S. Foreign Relations.” In The Gilded Age: Perspectives on the Origins of Modern America, CharlesW.Calhoun, ed.: 307–32. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2007.
    Gallagher, GaryW., ed. Antietam: Essays on the 1862 Maryland Campaign. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1989.
    Gallagher, GaryW., ed. The Richmond Campaign of 1862: The Peninsula and the Seven Days. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.
    Gantt, Jonathan. Irish Terrorism in the Atlantic Community, 1865–1922. New York: Palgrave, 2010.http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230250451
    Gardiner, A.G.The Life of Sir William Harcourt. 2 vols. New York: George H. Doran, 1923.
    Gardner, MarthaMabie. The Qualities of a Citizen: Women, Immigration, and Citizenship, 1870–1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
    Garroutte, EvaMarie. “The Racial Formation of American Indians: Negotiating Legitimate Identities within Tribal and Federal Law.” In American Indian Quarterly25, no. 2 (2001): 224–39.http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2001.0020
    Gibb, Paul. “Unmasterly Inactivity? Sir Julian Pauncefote, Lord Salisbury, and the Venezuela Boundary Dispute.” In Diplomacy & Statecraft16, no. 1 (2005): 23–55.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592290590916121
    Gilbert, ArthurN.The American Indian and United States Diplomatic History.” In History Teacher8, no. 2 (1975): 229–41.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/491526
    Gilbert, Felix. To the Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961.
    Gilderhus, MarkT.The Monroe Doctrine: Meanings and Implications.” In Presidential Studies Quarterly36, no. 1 (2006): 5–16.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.00282.x
    Gismondi, Michael, and JeremyMouat. “Merchants, Mining and Concessions on Nicaragua's Mosquito Coast: Reassessing the American Presence, 1893–1912.” In Journal of Latin American Studies34, no. 4 (2002): 845–80.
    Goldberg, JoyceS.Consent to Ascent: The ‘Baltimore’ Affair and the U.S. Rise to World Power Status.” In Americas41, no. 1 (1984): 21–35.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1006946
    Graebner, NormanA.Isolation and Antifederalism: The Ratification Debates.” In Diplomatic History11, no. 4 (Fall 1987): 337–53.
    Greenberg, AmyS.Manifest Manhood and the Antebellum American Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    Haller, JohnS., Jr.Outcasts from Evolution: Scientific Attitudes of Racial Inferiority, 1859–1900. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1971.
    Hanna, AlfredJ., and KathrynA.Hanna. Napoleon III and Mexico: American Triumph over Monarchy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1971.
    Hausman, WilliamJ., PeterHertner, and MiraWilkins. Global Electrification: Multinational Enterprise and International Finance in the History of Light and Power, 1878–2007. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511512131
    Headrick, DanielR.The Invisible Weapon: Telecommunications and International Politics, 1851–1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
    Healy, David. James G. Blaine and Latin America. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2001.
    Healy, David. U.S. Expansionism: The Imperialist Urge in the 1890s. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970
    Heckscher, EliF.The Continental System: An Economic Interpretation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1922.
    Heidler, DavidS., and JeanneT.Heidler, eds. Manifest Destiny. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2003.
    Hendrickson, DavidC.Peace Pact: The Lost World of the American Founding. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2003.
    Herring, GeorgeC.From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    Hickey, Donald. The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2677533
    Hietala, ThomasR.Manifest Design: American Exceptionalism and Empire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.
    Higham, John. Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1955.
    Hill, PeterP.Napoleon's Troublesome Americans: Franco-American Relations 1804–1815. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books, 2005.
    Hixson, WalterL.The Myth of American Diplomacy: National Identity and U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.
    Hoganson, Kristin. Consumers’ Imperium: The Global Production of American Domesticity, 1865–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.
    Hoganson, Kristin. Fighting for American Manhood: How Gender Politics Provoked the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
    Hoganson, Kristin. “Stuff It: Domestic Consumption and the Americanization of the World Paradigm.” In Diplomatic History30, no. 4 (2006): 571–94.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2006.00579.x
    Holton, SandraStanley. “‘To Educate Women into Rebellion’: Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the Creation of a Transatlantic Network of Radical Suffragists.” In American Historical Review99, no. 4 (1994): 1112–36.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2168771
    Horsman, Reginald. The Causes of the War of 1812. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1962.
    Horsman, Reginald. The Diplomacy of the New Republic, 1776–1815. Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson, 1985.
    Horsman, Reginald. Expansion and American Indian Policy 1783–1812. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1967.
    Horsman, Reginald. Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism.
    #1
    Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.
    Horsman, Reginald. The War of 1812. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1917725
    Howe, DanielW.What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
    Hunt, MichaelH.American Ascendancy: How the United States Gained and Wielded Global Dominance. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.
    Hunt, MichaelH.Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.
    Hutson, JamesH.John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1980.
    Ilchman, WarrenFrederick. Professional Diplomacy in the United States, 1779–1939: A Study in Administrative History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.
    Immerman, RichardH.Empire for Liberty: A History of American Imperialism from Benjamin Franklin to Paul Wolfowitz. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
    Jacobson, MatthewFrye. Barbarian Virtues: The United States Encounters Foreign Peoples at Home and Abroad, 1876–1917. New York: Hill & Wang, 2000.
    Jacobson, MatthewFrye. Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
    Jenkins, Brian. Britain and the War for the Union. 2 vols. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1974, 1980.
    Jensen, Merrill. The New Nation: A History of the United States during the Confederation 1781–1789. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1950.http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v084n035.p013
    Jones, Howard. Abraham Lincoln and a New Birth of Freedom: The Union and Slavery in the Diplomacy of the Civil War. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1999.
    Jones, Howard. Blue and Gray Diplomacy: A History of Union and Confederate Foreign Relations. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010.
    Jones, Howard. Union in Peril: The Crisis over British Intervention in the Civil War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.
    Jones, RaymondA.The British Diplomatic Service, 1815–1914. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1983.
    Jordan, Donaldson, and EdwinJ.Pratt. Europe and the American Civil War. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1931.
    Kagan, Robert. Dangerous Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006.http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.19
    Kaminski, JohnP.Honor and Interest: John Jay's Diplomacy during the Confederation.” In New York History33, no. 3 (Summer 2002): 293–327.
    Kammen, MichaelG.A Rope of Sand: The Colonial Agents, British Politics and the American Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968.
    Kaplan, LawrenceS.Alexander Hamilton: Ambivalent Anglophile. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 2002.
    Kaplan, LawrenceS.Colonies into Nation: American Diplomacy, 1763–1801. New York: Macmillan, 1972.
    Kaplan, LawrenceS.Entangling Alliances with None: American Foreign Policy in the Age of Jefferson. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1987.
    Kaplan, LawrenceS.Jefferson and France: An Essay on Politics and Political Ideas. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1967.
    Kaplan, LawrenceS.Thomas Jefferson: Westward the Course of Empire. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1999.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3124928
    Kaufman, BurtonIra, ed. Washington's Farewell Address: The View from the 20th Century. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1969.
    Kelley, Robert. The Transatlantic Persuasion: The Liberal-Democratic Mind in the Age of Gladstone. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969.
    Kenkel, JosephF.Progressives and Protection: The Search for a Tariff Policy, 1866–1936. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1983.
    Kennedy, CharlesStuart. The American Consul: A History of the United States Consular Service, 1776–1914. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1990.
    Kennedy, Paul. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House, 1987.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813%2888%2990030-4
    Kern, Stephen. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1918. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
    Ketcham, RalphL.James Madison: A Biography. New York: Macmillan, 1971.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1893745
    Kloppenberg, JamesT.Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25142914
    Kluger, Richard. Seizing Destiny: How America Grew from Sea to Shining Sea. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007.
    Koht, Halvdan. “The Origin of Seward's Plan to Purchase the Danish West Indies.” In American Historical Review50, no. 4 (1945): 762–67.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1842701
    Kramer, Paul. “Empires, Exceptions, and Anglo-Saxons: Race and Rule between the British and U.S. Empires, 1880–1910.” In Journal of American History88, no. 4 (2002): 1315–53.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2700600
    Kukla, Jon. A Wilderness So Immense: The Louisiana Purchase and the Destiny of America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003.
    Kusmer, KennethL.Toward a Comparative History of Racism and Xenophobia in the United States and Germany, 1865–1933.” In Bridging the Atlantic: The Question of American Exceptionalism in Perspective, ElisabethGläser and HermannWellenreuther, eds.: 145–80. Washington, DC: Cambridge University Press for the German Historical Institute, 2002.
    LaFeber, Walter. The American Age: U.S. Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad since 1750. New York: W. W. Norton, 1989.
    LaFeber, Walter. The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations. Vol. 2: The American Search for Opportunity, 1865–1913. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
    LaFeber, Walter. The New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansion, 1860–1898. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.
    Lambert, Frank. The Barbary Wars: American Independence in the Atlantic World. New York: Hill & Wang, 2005.
    Lang, DanielG.Foreign Policy in the Early Republic: The Law of Nations and the Balance of Power. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1985.
    Latimer, Jon. 1812: War with America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1848824
    Lee, Erika. At America's Gates: Chinese Immigration during the Exclusion Era, 1882–1943. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003.
    Lee, Erika. “Enforcing the Borders: Chinese Exclusion along the U.S. Borders with Canada and Mexico, 1882–1924.” In Journal of American History89, no. 1 (2002): 54–86.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2700784
    Leonard, ThomasM.United States-Latin American Relations, 1850–1903: Establishing a Relationship. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1999.
    Lewis, JamesE., Jr.The American Union and the Problem of Neighborhood: The United States and the Collapse of the Spanish Empire 1783–1829. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.
    Limerick, PatriciaNelson. The Legacy of Conquest. New York: W. W. Norton, 1987.
    Long, DavidFoster. Gold Braid and Foreign Relations: Diplomatic Activities of U.S. Naval Officers, 1798–1883. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1988.
    Love, EricTyrone Lowery. Race over Empire: Racism and U.S. Imperialism, 1865–1900. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004.
    Lycan, GilbertL.Alexander Hamilton & American Foreign Policy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1970.
    Lyon, E.Wilson. Louisiana in French Diplomacy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1974.
    Mahon, JohnK.The War of 1812. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1972.
    Malone, Dumas. Jefferson and His Time. 6 vols. Boston: Little, Brown, 1948–1981.
    “Manifest Destiny” at http://www.enotes.com/american-history-literature-cc/manifest-destiny (accessed December 28, 2010).
    Marks, FrederickW., III. Independence on Trial: Foreign Affairs and the Making of the Constitution.
    2nd ed.
    Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.
    Masterson, WilliamH.Tories and Democrats: British Diplomats in Pre-Jacksonian America. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1985.
    Mathews, JosephJ.Informal Diplomacy in the Venezuelan Crisis of 1896.” In Mississippi Valley Historical Review50, no. 2 (1963): 195–212.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1902753
    Matthew, H.C. G.Gladstone, 1809–1874. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
    Matthewson, Tim. A Proslavery Foreign Policy: Haitian-American Relations during the Early Republic. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.
    Mattox, HenryE.The Twilight of Amateur Diplomacy: The American Foreign Service and Its Senior Officers in the 1890s. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1989.
    May, ErnestR.Imperial Democracy: The Emergence of America as a Great Power. New York: Harcourt, 1961.
    May, RobertE.Epilogue to the Missouri Compromise: The South, the Balance of Power, and the Tropics in the 1850s.” In Plantation Society, no. 1 (June 1979): 201–25.
    May, RobertE.Power, Pride, and Purse: Diplomatic Origins of the Constitution.” In Diplomatic History11, no. 4 (Fall 1987): 303–19.
    May, RobertE.The Southern Dream of a Caribbean Empire, 1854–1861. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1989.
    McCoy, DrewR.The Elusive Republic: Political Economy in Jeffersonian America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.
    McDougall, WalterA.Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World since 1776. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997.
    McFadden, Margaret. Golden Cables of Sympathy: The Transatlantic Sources of Nineteenth-Century Feminism. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1999.
    McKay, Derek, and H.M.Scott. The Rise of the Great Powers 1648–1815. New York: Longmans, 1983.
    McKeown, Adam. “Ritualization of Regulation: The Enforcement of Chinese Exclusion in the United States and China.” In American Historical Review108, no. 2 (2003): 377–403.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/533239
    McMichael, Andrew. Atlantic Loyalties: Americans in Spanish West Florida, 1785–1810. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2008.
    McPherson, JamesM.Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
    McPherson, JamesM.Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
    McPherson, JamesM.For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
    McPherson, JamesM.Tried by War: Abraham Lincoln as Commander in Chief. New York: Penguin, 2008.
    McPherson, JamesM.What They Fought For, 1861–1865. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1994.
    Mead, RussellWalter. Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001.
    Merk, Frederick. History of the Westward Movement. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978.
    Merli, FrankJ.The Alabama, British Neutrality, and the American Civil War. DavidM.Fahey, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.
    Merli, FrankJ.Great Britain and the Confederate Navy, 1861–1865. 1970. Reprint with new introduction by Howard Jones. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.
    Mihm, Stephen. A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men, and the Making of the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
    Miller, MelanieRandolph. Envoy to the Terror: Gouverneur Morris & the French Revolution. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books, 2005.
    Miller, SallyM.For White Men Only: The Socialist Party of America and Issues of Gender, Ethnicity and Race.” In Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era2, no. 3 (2003): 283–302.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537781400000426
    Mitchell, Nancy. The Danger of Dreams: German and American Imperialism in Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999.
    Monaghan, Jay. Abraham Lincoln Deals with Foreign Affairs: A Diplomat in Carpet Slippers. Introduction by HowardJones. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997. Originally published as Diplomat in Carpet Slippers: Abraham Lincoln Deals with Foreign Affairs. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1945.
    Moreno, Gary. “Rage against the Monarchy: American Reaction to French Intervention in Mexico.” In Journal of the West47, no. 3 (2008): 48–55.
    Morgan, WilliamMichael. “The Anti-Japanese Origins of the Hawaiian Annexation Treaty of 1897.” In Diplomatic History6, no. 1 (1982): 23–44.
    Morris, RichardB.The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00937.x
    Moses, L.G.Wild West Shows and the Images of American Indians, 1883–1933. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1996.
    Murphy, CharlesT.Charles Gravier, Compte de Vergennes: French Diplomacy in the Age of Revolution, 1719–1787. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1982.
    Neuman, GeraldL.Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
    Newman, LouiseMichele. White Women's Rights: The Racial Origins of Feminism in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    Ngai, MaeM.The Architecture of Race in American Immigration Law: A Reexamination of the Immigration Act of 1924.” In Journal of American History86, no. 1 (1999): 67–92.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2567407
    Ngai, MaeM.Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
    Ninkovich, FrankA.Global Dawn: The Cultural Foundation of American Internationalism, 1865–1890. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
    Nugent, Walter. Habits of Empire: A History of American Expansion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008.
    Nuxoll, ElizabethMiles. Congress and the Munitions Merchants: The Secret Committee of Trade during the American Revolution 1775–1777. New York: Garland, 1985.
    Ogawa, Manako. “The ‘White Ribbon League of Nations’ Meets Japan: The Trans-Pacific Activism of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, 1906–1930.” In Diplomatic History31, no. 1 (2007): 21–50.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2007.00601.x
    Onuf, Peter, and NicholasOnuf. Federal Union, Modern World: The Law of Nations in an Age of Revolution, 1776–1814. Madison, WI: Madison House, 1993.
    O'Sullivan, John. “Annexation.” In United States Magazine and Democratic Review17, no. 1 (July-August 1845): 5–10.
    Ott, ThomasO.The Haitian Revolution 1789–1804. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1973.
    Owsley, FrankL.King Cotton Diplomacy: Foreign Relations of the Confederate States of America. Revised by HarrietC.Owsley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959. Reprint with new introduction by Howard Jones. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2009.
    Owsley, FrankLawrence, Jr., and GeneA.Smith. Filibusters and Expansionists: Jeffersonian Manifest Destiny, 1800–1821. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1997.
    Palen, Marc-William. “Protection, Federation, and Union: The Global Impact of the McKinley Tariff upon the British Empire, 1890–94.” In Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History38, no. 3 (2010): 395–418.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2010.503395
    Pares, Richard. Colonial Blockade and Neutral Rights 1739–1763. New York: Oxford University Press, 1938.
    Park, JamesWilliam. Latin American Underdevelopment: A History of Perspectives in the United States, 1870–1965. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1995.
    Parker, RichardB.Uncle Sam in Barbary: A Diplomatic History. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2004.
    Paterson, ThomasG.American Businessmen and Consular Service Reform, 1890s to 1906.” In Business History Review40, no. 1 (1966): 77–98.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3112303
    Patrick, RembertW.Florida Fiasco: Rampant Rebels on the Georgia-Florida Border. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1954.
    Pegler-Gordon, Anna. “Chinese Exclusion, Photography, and the Development of U.S. Immigration Policy.” In American Quarterly58, no. 1 (2006): 51–77.http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2006.0032
    Perkins, Bradford. Castlereagh and Adams: England and the United States, 1812–1823. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964.
    Perkins, Bradford. The Creation of a Republican Empire, 1776–1865, Vol. I of The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
    Perkins, Bradford. The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1955.
    Perkins, Bradford. Prologue to War: England and the United States, 1805–1812. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1979512
    Peterson, MerrillD.Thomas Jefferson and Commercial Policy, 1783–1793.” In William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 22, no. 4 (October 1965), 584–610.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1922911
    Peterson, MerrillD.Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation: A Biography. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970.
    Phelps, NicoleMarie. “Sovereignty, Citizenship, and the New Liberal Order: U.S.-Habsburg Relations and the Transformation of International Politics, 1880–1924.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota, 2008.
    Platt, D.C. M.The Cinderella Service: British Consuls since 1825. New York: Longmans, 1971.
    Pletcher, DavidM.The Diplomacy of Annexation: Texas, Oregon, and the Mexican War. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1973.
    Pletcher, DavidM.The Diplomacy of Trade and Investment: American Economic Expansion in the Hemisphere, 1865–1900. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1998.
    Pletcher, DavidM.Reciprocity and Latin America in the Early 1890s: A Foretaste of Dollar Diplomacy.” In Pacific Historical Review47, no. 1 (1978): 53–89.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3637339
    Plischke, Elmer. U.S. Department of State: A Reference History. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999.
    Potts, LouisW.Arthur Lee: A Virtuous Revolutionary. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1981.
    Pratt, JuliusW.Expansionists of 1812. New York: Macmillan, 1925.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1889580
    Price, JacobM.France and the Chesapeake: A History of the French Tobacco Monopoly, 1674–1791, and of Its Relationship to the British and American Tobacco Trades. 2 vols. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1973.
    Rakove, JackM.The Beginning of National Politics: An Interpretive History of the Continental Congress. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979.
    Remini, RobertV.Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars. New York: Penguin, 2001.
    Remini, RobertV.Henry Clay: Statesman for the Union. New York: W. W. Norton, 1991.
    Richardson, HeatherCox. The Death of Reconstruction: Race, Labor, and Politics in the Post-Civil War North, 1865–1901. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
    Ridley, JasperGodwin. Maximilian and Juárez. New York: Ticknor & Fields, 1992.
    Rigby, Barry. “The Origins of American Expansion in Hawaii and Samoa, 1865–1900.” In International History Review10, no. 2 (June 1988): 221–37.
    Ritcheson, CharlesR.Aftermath of Revolution: British Policy toward the United States, 1783–1795. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1969.
    Rodgers, DanielT.Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998.
    Roediger, DavidR.Working toward Whiteness: How America's Immigrants Became White. New York: Basic Books, 2005.
    Rolde, Neil. Continental Liar from the State of Maine: James G. Blaine. Gardiner, ME: Tilbury House Publishers, 2006.
    Rosenberg, EmilyS.Spreading the American Dream: American Economic and Cultural Expansion, 1890–1945. New York: Hill & Wang, 1982.
    Rothman, DavidJ.Politics and Power: The United States Senate, 1869–1901. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2129861
    Rupp, LeliaJ.Worlds of Women: The Making of an International Women's Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852009X458313
    Rutland, RobertAllen. The Presidency of James Madison. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1990.
    Rydell, RobertW.All the World's a Fair: Visions of Empire at American International Expositions, 1876–1916. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
    Salyer, Lucy. Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modern Immigration Law. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
    Sampson, RobertD.John L. O'Sullivan and His Times. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 2003.
    Saul, Norman. Distant Friends: The United States and Russia, 1763–1867. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1991.
    Savelle, Max. The Origins of American Diplomacy. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
    Schiff, Stacy. A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France and the Birth of America. New York: Henry Holt, 2005.
    Schonberger, HowardB.Transportation to the Seaboard; the Communication Revolution and American Foreign Policy, 1860–1900. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1971.
    Schulte, Nordholt, and JanWillem. The Dutch Republic and American Independence. HerbertH.Rowen, trans. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1982.
    Schulzinger, RobertD.The Making of the Diplomatic Mind: The Training, Outlook, and Style of United States Foreign Service Officers, 1908–1931. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1975.
    Setser, VernonG.The Commercial Reciprocity Policy of the United States, 1774–1829. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1937.
    Sexton, Jay. Debtor Diplomacy: Finance and American Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era, 1837–1873. Oxford, England: Clarendon, 2005.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281039.001.0001
    Sexton, Jay. The Monroe Doctrine: Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Hill & Wang, 2011.
    Shackleford, GeorgeGreen. Jefferson's Adopted Son: The Life of William Short, 1759–1848. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1993.
    Shanks, Cheryl. Immigration and the Politics of American Sovereignty, 1890–1990. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.
    Shumsky, NeilLarry. “‘Let No Man Stop to Plunder!’ American Hostility to Return Migration, 1890–1924.” In Journal of American Ethnic History11, no. 2 (1992): 56–75.
    Silbey, JoelH.The American Political Nation, 1838–1893. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991.
    Skeen, C.Edward. John Armstrong Jr. 1758–1843: A Biography. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1981.
    Skowronek, Steven. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665080
    Smith, DanielM.The American Diplomatic Experience. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20042313
    Smith, DavidA.From the Mississippi to the Mediterranean: The 1891 New Orleans Lynching and Its Effects on United States Diplomacy and the American Navy.” In Southern Historian, no. 19 (1998): 60–85.
    Smith, RobertW.Keeping the Republic: Ideology and Early American Diplomacy. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2004.
    Smith, RogersM.Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/202487
    Smith, Shannon. “From Relief to Revolution: American Women and the Russian-American Relationship, 1890–1917.” In Diplomatic History19, no. 4 (1995): 601–16.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1995.tb00667.x
    Snay, Mitchell. “The Imagined Republic: The Fenians, Irish American Nationalism, and the Political Culture of Reconstruction.” In Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society112, no. 2 (2002): 291–313.
    Sneider, AllisonL.Suffragists in an Imperial Age: U.S. Expansion and the Woman Question, 1870–1929. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195321166.001.0001
    Spalding, Matthew, and PatrickJ.Garraty. A Sacred Union of Citizens: George Washington's Farewell Address and the American Character. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.
    Spickard, PaulR.Almost All Aliens: Immigration, Race, and Colonialism in American History and Identity. New York: Routledge, 2007.
    Spivak, Burton. Jefferson's English Crisis: Commerce, Embargo, and the Republican Revolution. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.
    Stagg, J.C. A.Borderlines in Borderlands: James Madison and the Spanish American Frontier 1776–1821. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.
    Stagg, J.C. A.Mr. Madison's War: Politics, Diplomacy and Warfare in the Early American Republic 1783–1830. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.
    Stahr, Walter. John Jay. New York: Hambleton and London, 2005.
    Stephanson, Anders. Manifest Destiny: American Expansion and the Empire of Right. New York: Hill & Wang, 1995.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3124696
    Stinchcombe, WilliamC.The American Revolution and the French Alliance. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1969.
    Stinchcombe, WilliamC.The XYZ Affair. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1980.
    Stockley, Andrew. Britain and France at the Birth of America: The European Powers and the Peace Negotiations of 1782–83. Exeter, England: University of Exeter Press, 2001.
    Stourzh, Gerald. Benjamin Franklin and American Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
    Strand, Wilson. “Opening the Hermit Kingdom.” In History Today54, no. 1 (2004): 20–26.
    Stremlau, Rose. “‘To Domesticate and Civilize Wild Indians’: Allotment and the Campaign to Reform Indian Families, 1875–1887.” In Journal of Family History30, no. 3 (2005): 265–86.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363199005275793
    Stuart, GrahamH.The Department of State: A History of its Organization, Procedure, and Personnel. New York: Macmillan, 1949.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00789.x
    Sword, Wiley. President Washington's Indian War: The Struggle for the Old Northwest, 1790–1795. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1985.
    Takaki, RonaldT.Iron Cages: Race and Culture in Nineteenth-Century America.
    #1
    New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.
    Tate, Merze. “Canada's Interest in the Trade and Sovereignty of Hawaii.” In Canadian Historical Review44, no. 1 (March 1963): 20–42.
    Tilby, A.Wyatt. Lord John Russell: A Study in Civil and Religious Liberty. London: Cassell, 1930.
    Torpey, John. The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520990
    Trachtenberg, Alan. The Incorporation of America: Culture and Society in the Gilded Age. New York: Hill & Wang, 1982.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ALH/AJG045
    Tucker, RobertW., and DavidC.Hendrickson. Empire of Liberty: The Statecraft of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
    Tucker, SpencerC.The Jeffersonian Gunboat Navy. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1993.
    Tucker, SpencerC., and FrankT.Reuter. Injured Honor: The Chesapeake-Leopard Affair, June 22, 1807. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1996.
    Tuffnell, Stephen. “‘Uncle Sam Is to Be Sacrificed’: Anglophobia in Late Nineteenth-Century Politics and Culture.” In American Nineteenth Century History12, no. 1 (2011): 77–99.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14664658.2011.559749
    Tyrrell, Ian. Woman's World/Woman's Empire: The Woman's Christian Temperance Union in International Perspective, 1880–1930. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.
    Van Doren, Carl. Benjamin Franklin. New York: Viking, 1938.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/074036a0
    Varg, PaulA.Foreign Policies of the Founding Fathers. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1963.
    Wahlstrom, T.William. “A Vision for Colonization: The Southern Migration Movement to Mexico after the U.S. Civil War.” In Southern Historian, no. 30 (2009): 50–66.
    Wallace, AnthonyF.C.The Long Bitter Trail: Andrew Jackson and the Indians. New York: Hill & Wang, 1993.
    Walt, Stephen. Taming American Power: The Global Response to American Primacy. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20031709
    Warren, GordonH.Fountain of Discontent: The Trent Affair and Freedom of the Seas. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1981.
    Watts, Steven. The Republic Reborn: War and the Making of Liberal America, 1790–1820. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.
    Webb, Clive. “The Lynching of Sicilian Immigrants in the American South, 1886–1910.” In American Nineteenth Century History3, no. 1 (2002): 45–76.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713998981
    Weil, Martin. A Pretty Good Club: The Founding Fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service. New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.
    Weitz, EricD.Race and Nation: An Intellectual History.” In A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation:16–52. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
    Welke, BarbaraYoung. Law and the Borders of Belonging in the Long Nineteenth Century United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778704
    Welke, BarbaraYoung. Recasting American Liberty: Gender, Race, Law and the Railroad Revolution, 1865–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    Werking, RichardHume. The Master Architects: Building the United States Foreign Service, 1890–1913. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1977.
    Whitaker, ArthurPreston. The Mississippi Question 1795–1803: A Study in Trade, Politics and Diplomacy. Washington, DC: American Historical Society, 1934.
    White, Richard. “Information, Markets, and Corruption: Transcontinental Railroads in the Gilded Age.” In Journal of American History90, no. 1 (2003): 19–43.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3659790
    Wiebe, RobertH.The Search for Order. New York: Hill & Wang, 1967.
    Wilentz, Sean. Andrew Jackson. New York: Times Books, 2005.
    Wilkins, DavidE.American Indian Sovereignty and the U. S. Supreme Court: The Masking of Justice. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319%2800%2900067-7
    Wilkins, DavidE.The U.S. Supreme Court's Explication of ‘Federal Plenary Power’: An Analysis of Case Law Affecting Tribal Sovereignty, 1886–1914.” In American Indian Quarterly18, no. 3 (1994): 349–68.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1184741
    Williams, T.Harry. Lincoln and His Generals. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1952.
    Williams, WilliamAppleman. The Roots of Modern American Empire: A Study of the Growth and Shaping of Social Consciousness in a Marketplace Society. New York: Vintage Books, 1969.
    Williams, WilliamAppleman. The Spanish-American Frontier 1783–1795: The Westward Movement and the Spanish Retreat in the Mississippi Valley. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1927.
    Williams, WilliamAppleman. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing, 1959.
    Williams, WilliamAppleman. The United States and the Independence of Latin America, 1800–1830. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1941.
    Wooster, Robert. The Military and United States Indian Policy, 1865–1903. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988.
    Wyman, Mark. Round-Trip to America: The Immigrants Return to Europe, 1880–1930. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
    Zimmerman, JamesF.Impressment of American Seamen. New York: Columbia University Press, 1925.
    Zolberg, AristideR.A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
    Part II: The United States on the International Stage
    Ambrosius, LloydE.Wilsonian Statecraft: Theory and Practice of Liberal Internationalism during World War I. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1991.
    Ambrosius, LloydE.Wilsonianism: Woodrow Wilson and His Legacy in American Foreign Relations. New York: Palgrave, 2002.http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403970046
    Ambrosius, LloydE.Woodrow Wilson.” In American National Biography, JohnA.Garraty and MarkCarnes, eds. no. 23: 604–12. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    Ambrosius, LloydE.Woodrow Wilson and the American Diplomatic Tradition: The Treaty Fight in Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528729
    Ambrosius, LloydE.Woodrow Wilson and The Birth of a Nation: American Democracy and International Relations.” In Diplomacy & Statecraft, no. 18 (December 2007): 689–718.
    Article 3, “Convention for the Construction of a Ship Canal (Hay-Baunau-Varilla Treaty), November 18, 1903.” http://avalon.yale.edu/20th_century/pan001.asp (accessed December 14, 2011).
    Atkins, EdwinF.Sixty Years in Cuba. New York: Arno, 1980.
    Bederman, Gail. Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1992-52-5
    Beisner, RobertL.Twelve against Empire: The Anti-Imperialists, 1898–1900. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
    Benjamin, JulesR.The United States and the Origins of the Cuban Revolution: An Empire of Liberty in an Age of National Liberation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
    Blum, Howard. The Floor of Heaven: A True Tale of the Last Frontier and the Yukon Gold Rush. New York: Crown, 2011.
    Blum, JohnMorton, The Republican Roosevelt. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.
    Bogle, LoriLyn. “TR's Use of PR to Strengthen the Navy.” In Naval History21, no. 6 (December 2007): 6–31.
    Bonker, Dirk. “Admiration, Enmity and Cooperation: U.S. Navalism and the British and German Empires before the Great War,” In Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History2, no. 1 (Spring 2001).
    Bradley, James. The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War. New York: Little, Brown, 2009.
    Brands, H.W.The Selected Letters of Theodore Roosevelt. New York: Cooper Square, 2001.
    Brands, H.W.T. R.: The Last Romantic. New York: Basic Books, 1997.
    Braur, Kinley. “The Slavery Problem in the Diplomacy of the American Civil War.” In Race and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Ages of Territorial and Market Expansion, 1840 to 1900, MichaelKrenn, ed.: 117–47. New York: Garland, 1998.
    Briggs, Laura. Reproducing Empire: Race, Sex, Science, and U.S. Imperialism in Puerto Rico. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/eth.1977.5.4.02a00030
    Coogan, JohnW.The End of Neutrality: The United States, Britain, and Maritime Rights, 1899–1915. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.
    Cooper, JohnMilton, Jr.Woodrow Wilson: A Biography. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2009.
    Crapol, Edward. James G. Blaine: Architect of Empire. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1999.
    DeRoche, Andrew. Andrew Young: Civil Rights Ambassador. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 2003.
    Du Bois, W.E. B.Returning Soldiers.” In The Crisis (May 1919), no. 13. http://www.yale.edu/glc/archive/1127.htm.
    Du Bois, W.E. B.The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Signet, 1982.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086026603259896
    Duffy Burnett, Christina, and BurkeMarshall, eds. Foreign in a Domestic Sense: Puerto Rico, American Expansion, and the Constitution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.
    Espinosa, Mariola. Epidemic Invasions: Yellow Fever and the Limits of Cuban Independence, 1878–1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
    Faragher, JohnMack. Rereading Frederick Jackson Turner: “The Significance of the Frontier in American History” and Other Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.
    Ferrer, Ada. Insurgent Cuba: Race, Nation, and Revolution, 1868–1898. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999.
    Fogelsong, DavidS.America's Secret War against Bolshevism: U.S. Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1917–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
    Gardner, LloydC.Safe for Democracy: The Anglo-American Response to Revolution, 1913–1923. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.
    Grant, James. Mr. Speaker! The Life and Times of Thomas B. Reed. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2011.
    Greene, Julie. The Canal Builders: Making America's Empire at the Panama Canal. New York: Penguin, 2009.
    Helg, Aline. Our Rightful Share: The Afro-Cuban Struggle for Equality, 1886–1912. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
    Herring, GeorgeC.From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    Hoganson, KristinL.Consumers’ Imperium: The Global Production of American Domesticity, 1865–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.
    Hoganson, KristinL.Fighting for American Manhood: How Gender Politics Provoked the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
    Hunt, MichaelH.The Making of the Special Relationship: The United States and China to 1914. New York: Columbia University Press, 1914.
    Jentleson, Bruce, and ThomasPaterson, eds. Encyclopedia of U.S. Foreign Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
    Johnson, RobertDavid. The Peace Progressives and American Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
    Kennedy, PhilipW.Race and American Expansion in Cuba and Puerto Rico, 1895–1905.” In Journal of Black Studies1, no. 3 (March 1971): 306–16.
    Kennedy, RossA.The Will to Believe: Woodrow Wilson, World War I, and America's Strategy for Peace and Security. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 2009.http://dx.doi.org/10.5356/jorient.50.2_236
    Knock, ThomasJ.To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
    Kramer, PaulA.The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006.
    LaFeber, Walter. The American Age: U.S. Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad since 1898. New York: W. W. Norton, 1994.
    LaFeber, Walter. The American Search for Opportunity, 1865–1913. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521381857
    LaFeber, Walter. Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America. New York: W. W. Norton, 1993.
    LaFeber, Walter. The New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansion, 1860–1898. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.
    Lauren, PaulGordon. Power and Prejudice: The Politics and Diplomacy of Racial Discrimination. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996.
    Levin, N.Gordon, Jr.Woodrow Wilson and World Politics: America's Response to War and Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.
    Lewis, DavidLevering. W. E. B. Du Bois: Biography of a Race, 1868–1919. New York: Henry Holt, 1993.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11016-010-9408-1
    Link, ArthurS.The Higher Realism of Woodrow Wilson, and Other Essays. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1971.
    Link, ArthurS., ed. The Papers of Woodrow Wilson. 69 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1966–1994.
    Link, ArthurS.Wilson. 5 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947–1965.
    Link, ArthurS.Woodrow Wilson: Revolution, War, and Peace. Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson, 1979.
    Linn, BrianMcAllister. Guardians of Empire: The U.S. Army and the Pacific, 1902–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997.
    Love, EricT.L., Race over Empire: Racism and U.S. Imperialism, 1865–1900. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004.
    MacMillan, Margaret. Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World. New York: Random House, 2001.
    Madden, Ryan. Alaska: On-the-Road Histories. Northampton, MA: Interlink Books, 2005.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1184675
    Manela, Erez. The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592290108406228
    Martí, José. Selected Writings. EstherAllen, ed. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.
    Morris, Edmund. Theodore Rex. New York: Random House, 2001.
    Morton, Louis. “War Plan ‘Orange’: The Evolution of a Strategy.” In World Politics11, no. 2 (January 1959): 221–50.
    Ninkovich, Frank. The United States and Imperialism. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470999042.ch6
    Offner, JohnL.An Unwanted War: The Diplomacy of the United States and Spain over Cuba, 1895–1898. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.
    Paterson, ThomasG., et al., eds. American Foreign Relations: A History, Volume 1: To 1920.
    6th ed.
    Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2005.
    Pérez, Louis. Cuba and the United States: Ties of Singular Intimacy. Athens: University of Georgia, 2003.
    Pérez, Louis. Cuba between Empires, 1878–1902. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1983.
    Pérez, Louis. Cuba under the Platt Amendment, 1902–1934. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1986.
    Pérez, Louis., ed. José Marti in the United States: The Florida Experience. Tempe: Arizona State University Center for Latin American Studies, 1995.
    Pérez, Louis. On Becoming Cuba: Identity, Nationality, and Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999.
    Pérez, Louis. “The Pursuit of Pacification: Banditry and the United States Occupation of Cuba, 1889–1902.” In Journal of Latin American Studies18, no. 2 (November 1986): 313–32.
    Pérez, Louis. The War of 1898: The United States and Cuba in History and Historiography. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.
    Roberts, Priscilla. “The Anglo-American Theme: American Visions of an Atlantic Alliance, 1914–1933.” In Diplomatic History, no. 21 (Summer 1997): 333–64.
    Robinson, Michael, and FrankSchubert. “David Fagen: An Afro-American Rebel in the Philippines, 1899–1901.” In Race and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Ages of Territorial and Market Expansion, 1840 to 1900, MichaelKrenn, ed.: 300–15. New York: Garland, 1998.
    Rosenberg, Emily. Financial Missionaries to the World: The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, 1900–1930. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.
    Rosenberg, Emily. “From Colonialism to Professionalism: The Public-Private Dynamic in United States Foreign Financial Advising, 1898–1929.” In Journal of American History74, no. 1 (June 1987): 59–82.
    Rosenberg, Emily. Spreading the American Dream: American Economic and Cultural Expansion, 1890–1945. New York: Hill & Wang, 1982.
    Salvatore, Nick. Eugene V. Debs: Citizen and Socialist. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1984.
    Schulzinger, RobertD.U.S. Diplomacy since 1900. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    Schwabe, Klaus. Woodrow Wilson, Revolutionary Germany, and Peacemaking, 1918–1919: Missionary Diplomacy and the Realities of Power. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1985.
    Scott, RebeccaJ.A Cuban Connection: Edwin F. Atkins, Charles Francis Adams Jr., and the Former Slaves of the Soledad Plantation.” In Massachusetts Historical Review, no. 9 (2007): 7–34.
    Scott, RebeccaJ.Degrees of Freedom: Louisiana and Cuba after Slavery. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1147
    Scott, RebeccaJ.Race, Labor, and Citizenship in Cuba: A View from the Sugar District of Cienfuegos, 1886–1909.” In Hispanic American Historical Review78, no. 4 (November 1998): 687–728.
    Scott, RebeccaJ.Slave Emancipation in Cuba: The Transition to Free Labor, 1860–1899. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2514783
    Small, Melvin. Democracy and Diplomacy: The Impact of Domestic Politics on U.S. Foreign Policy, 1789–1994. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
    Stevenson, David. Cataclysm: The First World War as Political Tragedy. New York: Basic Books, 2004.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0451-54
    Strong, Josiah. Our Country: Its Possible Future and Present Crisis. New York: Baker & Taylor, 1885.http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.21463
    SuárezFindlay, EileenJ.Imposing Decency: The Politics of Sexuality and Race in Puerto Rico, 1870–1920. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999.
    Takaki, Ronald. Pau Hana: Plantation Life and Labor in Hawaii. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 1983.
    Thomas, Evan. The War Lovers: Roosevelt, Lodge, Hearst, and the Rush to Empire, 1898. New York: Back Bay Books, 2010.
    Tone, JohnLawrence. War and Genocide in Cuba, 1895–1898. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006.
    Tucker, RobertW.Woodrow Wilson and the Great War: Reconsidering America's Neutrality, 1914–1917. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2007.
    Twain, Mark. Following the Equator and Anti-Imperialist Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
    Widenor, WilliamC.Henry Cabot Lodge and the Search for an American Foreign Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
    Williams, WalterL.United States Indian Policy and the Debate over Philippine Annexation: Implications for the Origins of American Imperialism.” In Journal of American History66, no. 4 (March 1980): 810–31.
    Wilson, Woodrow. The Public Papers of Woodrow Wilson: The New Democracy, RayStannardBaker and WilliamE.Dodd, eds. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1926.
    Wilson, Woodrow. The Public Papers of Woodrow Wilson: War and Peace, RayStannardBaker and WilliamE.Dodd, eds. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1927.
    Zeiler, Thomas. Ambassadors in Pinstripes: The Spalding World Baseball Tour and the Birth of the American Empire. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
    Part III: Diplomacy and Foreign Policy between the Wars
    Adler, Selig. The Uncertain Giant: 1921–1941. New York: Macmillan, 1965.
    Anderson, Martin, and AnneliseAnderson. Reagan's Secret War: The Untold Story of His Fight to Save the World from Nuclear Disaster. New York: Crown, 2009.
    Asada, Sadao. “Between the Old Diplomacy and the New, 1918–1922: The Washington System and the Origins of Japanese-American Rapprochement.” In Diplomatic History30, no. 2 (April 2006): 211–30.
    Ashby, LeRoy. The Spearless Leader: Senator Borah and the Progressive Movement in the 1920s. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1972.
    Baker, JamesA.The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War & Peace, 1989–1992. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1995.
    Berg, A.Scott. Lindbergh. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1998.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1890171
    Berle, BeatriceB., and TravisB.Jacobs, eds. Navigating the Rapids, 1918–1971: From the Papers of Adolf A. Berle. New York: Harcourt, 1973.
    Bernstein, Barton, ed. The Atomic Bomb: The Critical Issues. Boston: Little, Brown.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20047025
    Berthon, Simon, and JoannaPotts. Warlords. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo, 2006.
    Billington, RayAllen. “The Origins of Middle Western Isolationism.” In Political Science Quarterly60, no. 1 (March 1945): 44–64.
    Bolt, ErnestC.Ballots before Bullets: The War Referendum Approach to Peace in America, 1914–1941. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1977.
    Borgwardt, Elizabeth. A New Deal for the World: America's Vision for Human Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.
    Braeman, John. “Power and Diplomacy: The 1920s Reappraised.” In Review of Politics44, no. 3 (July 1982): 342–69.
    Braumoeller, BearF.The Myth of American Isolationism.” In Foreign Policy Analysis6, no. 4 (2010).
    Buckley, John. “The Icarus Factor: the American Pursuit of Myth in Naval Arms Control, 1921–36.” In The Washington Conference, 1921–22: Naval Rivalry, East Asian Stability and the Road to Pearl Harbor, ErikGoldstein and JohnMaurer, eds.: 124–46. London: Frank Cass, 1994.
    Buckley, ThomasH.The United States and the Washington Conference, 1921–1922. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1970.
    Bulmer-Thomas, Victor. The Economic History of Latin America since Independence.
    2nd ed.
    New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    Burk, Kathleen. “The Lineaments of Foreign Policy: The United States and a ‘New World Order,’ 1919–39.” In Journal of American Studies26, no. 3 (1992): 377–91.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021875800031121
    Burns, E.Bradford. The Poverty of Progress: Latin America in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/290280
    Bush, George. “Remarks to Citizens in Hamtramck, Michigan,” April 17, 1989, and “Remarks at the Texas A&M University Commencement Ceremony in College Station,” May 12, 1989, in The Public Papers of the Presidents, George Bush, 1989, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=16935&st=&st1=#axzz1MuomV5oo, and http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=17022&st=&st1=#axzz1MuomV5oo (accessed May 19, 2011).
    Carroll, JohnM.American Diplomacy in the 1920s.” In Modern American Diplomacy, JohnM.Carroll and GeorgeC.Herring, eds.: 61–79. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1996.
    Carroll, JohnM.Owen D. Young and German Reparations.” In U.S. Diplomats in Europe, 1919–1941, KennethPaulJones, ed. Santa Barbara, CA: CLIO, 1981.
    Chadwin, MarkLincoln. The Warhawks: American Interventionists before Pearl Harbor. New York: W. W. Norton, 1970.
    Chernyaev, Anatoly. The Diary of Anatoly Chernyaev 1985–89. The National Security Archive. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/index.html#Europe (accessed May 2011).
    Chester, EdwardW.The Scope and Variety of U.S. Diplomatic History, Readings since 1900. Vol. 2. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.
    Cohen, WarrenI.America and the World in the 1920s.” In Calvin Coolidge and the Coolidge Era: Essays on the History of the 1920s, JohnEarlHaynes, ed.: 233–43. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1998.
    Cohen, WarrenI.America's Response to China: A History of Sino-American Relations.
    4th ed.
    New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.
    Cohen, WarrenI.Empire without Tears: America's Foreign Relations, 1921–1933. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987.
    Cohrs, Patrick. The Unfinished Peace after World War I: America, Britain and the Stabilisation of Europe, 1919–1932. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497001
    Cole, WayneS.America First! The Battle against Intervention, 1940–1941. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1953.
    Cole, WayneS.Roosevelt and the Isolationists 1932–1945. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983.
    Connell-Smith, Gordon. “Latin America in the Foreign Relations of the United States.” In Journal of Latin American Studies8, no. 1 (May 1976): 137–50.
    Connell-Smith, Gordon. The United States and Latin America: An Historical Analysis of Inter-American Relations. London: Heinemann, 1974.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00018204
    Costigliola, Frank. Awkward Dominion: American Political, Economic, and Cultural Relations with Europe, 1919–1933. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.
    Costigliola, Frank. “The United States and the Reconstruction of Germany in the 1920s.” In Business History Review50, no. 4 (Winter 1976): 477–502.
    Current, Richard. “Henry L. Stimson.” In An Uncertain Tradition: American Secretaries of State in the Twentieth Century, NormanA.Graebner, ed.: 168–83, 319–20. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.
    Current, Richard. Secretary Stimson: A Study in Statecraft. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1954.
    Dallek, Robert. Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932–1945.
    2nd ed.
    New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
    Danelski, DavidJ., and JosephS.Tulchin, eds. The Autobiographical Notes of Charles Evans Hughes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.
    Daniels, Roger. Guarding the Golden Door: American Immigration Policy and Immigrants since 1882. New York: Hill & Wang, 2004.
    De Grazia, Victoria. Irresistible Empire: America's Advance through Twentieth-Century Europe. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.
    DeBenedetti, Charles. Origins of the Modern American Peace Movement, 1915–1929. Millwood, NY: KTO, 1978.
    Dilks, David, ed. The Diaries of Sir Alexander Cadogan, 1938–1945. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1972.
    Dingman, Roger. Power in the Pacific: The Origins of Naval Arms Limitations, 1914–1922. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
    Divine, RobertA.The Illusion of Neutrality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
    Doenecke, JustusD., ed. The Diplomacy of Frustration: The Manchurian Crisis of 1931–1933 as Revealed in the Papers of Stanley K. Hornbeck. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution, 1981.
    Doenecke, JustusD.Recent Explorations Concerning the Interwar Period.” In A Companion to American Foreign Relations, RobertD.Schulzinger, ed.: 168–87. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.
    Doenecke, JustusD.Storm on the Horizon: The Challenge to American Intervention, 1939–1941. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.10.008
    Doenecke, JustusD. and MarkStoler. Debating Franklin D. Roosevelt's Foreign Policies 1933–1945, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.
    Eckes, AlfredE., Jr., and ThomasW.Zeiler. Globalization and the American Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    Edmonds, Robin. The Big Three: Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin in Peace and War. New York: W. W. Norton, 1991.
    Ellis, L.Ethan. Republican Foreign Policy, 1921–1933. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1968.
    Eubank, Keith. The Summit Conferences: 1919–1960. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1966.
    Falkus, M.E.United States Economic Policy and the ‘Dollar Gap’ of the 1920s.” In Economic History Review24, no. 4 (November 1971): 599–623.
    Fanning, RichardW.Peace and Disarmament: Naval Rivalry and Arms Control, 1922–1933. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0130.1990.tb00144.x
    Farnham, Barbara. Roosevelt and the Munich Crisis: A Study of Political Decision-Making. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791679
    Feis, Herbert. Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin: The War They Waged and the Peace They Sought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.
    Ferrell, RobertH., ed. Off the Record, The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman. New York: Harper & Row, 1980.
    Ferris, JohnR.The Symbol and the Substance of Seapower: Great Britain, the United States and the One-Power Standard, 1919–1921.” In Anglo-American Relations in the 1920s: The Struggle for Supremacy, BrianJ. C.McKercher, ed.: 55–80. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 1991.
    Foglesong, DavidS.The American Mission and the “Evil Empire”: The Crusade for a “Free Russia” since 1881. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
    Gaddis, JohnLewis. Russia, the Soviet Union, and the United States: An Interpretive History.
    2nd ed.
    New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
    Garson, Robert, and StuartKidd, eds. The Roosevelt Years—New Perspectives on American History 1933–1945. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.
    Glad, Betty. Charles Evans Hughes and the Illusions of Innocence: A Study in American Diplomacy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1966.
    Glantz, MaryE.FDR and the Soviet Union: The President's Battles over Foreign Policy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2005.
    Gobat, Michel. Confronting the American Dream: Nicaragua under U.S. Imperial Rule. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.
    Gorbachev, Mikhail. “Excerpts from Address by Mikhail Gorbachev, 43rd U.N. General Assembly Session,” December 7, 1988. http://isc.temple.edu/hist249/course/Documents/gorbachev_speech_toUN.htm (accessed May 15, 2011).
    Gormly, James. From Potsdam to the Cold War: Big Three Diplomacy, 1945–1947. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1990.
    Grachev, Andrei. Gorbachev's Gamble: Soviet Foreign Policy and the End of the Cold War. Cambridge, England: Polity Press, 2008.
    Grandin, Greg. Fordlandia: The Rise and Fall of Henry Ford's Forgotten Jungle. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2009.
    Guinsburg, ThomasN.The Pursuit of Isolationism in the United States from Versailles to Pearl Harbor. New York: Garland, 1982.
    Habib, DouglasF.Chastity, Masculinity, and Military Efficiency: The United States Army in Germany, 1918–1923.” In International History Review28, no. 4 (December 2006): 737–57.
    Harbutt, Fraser. Yalta 1945: Europe and America at the Crossroads. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
    Herken, Gregg. The Winning Weapon: The Atomic Bomb in the Cold War 1945–1950. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1980.
    Herring, GeorgeC.From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    Hess, GaryR.The United States at War, 1941–1945.
    2nd ed.
    Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson, 2000.
    Hicks, JohnD.Republican Ascendancy, 1921–1933. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.
    Hirobe, Izumi. Japanese Pride, American Prejudice: Modifying the Exclusion Clause of the 1924 Immigration Act. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.
    Hoag, C.Leonard. Preface to Preparedness: The Washington Disarmament Conference and Public Opinion. Washington, DC: American Council on Public Affairs, 1941.
    Hoenicke-Moore, Michaela. Know Your Enemy: The American Debate on Nazism, 1933–1945, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
    Hoff, Joan. American Business and Foreign Policy, 1920–1933. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1971.
    Hoff, Joan. Ideology and Economics: U. S. Relations with the Soviet Union, 1918–1933. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1974.
    Hogan, MichaelJ.Corporatism.” In Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations, MichaelJ.Hogan and ThomasG.Paterson, eds.: 137–48. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
    Hogan, MichaelJ.Informal Entente: The Private Structure of Cooperation in Anglo-American Economic Diplomacy, 1918–1928. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1977.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3112841
    Holden, RobertH., and EricZolov. Latin America and the United States: A Documentary History.
    2nd ed.
    New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
    Hornbeck, StanleyK.The Diplomacy of Frustration: The Manchurian Crisis of 1931–1933. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution, 1981.
    Hull, Cordell, with AndrewBerding. The Memoirs of Cordell Hull. Vol. II. New York: Macmillan, 1948.
    Hunt, MichaelH.Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.
    INF Treaty and the Washington Summit. The National Security Archive. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/index.html#Europe (accessed May 12, 2011).
    Iriye, Akira. After Imperialism: The Search for a New Order in the Far East, 1921–1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.
    Jankowitsch, Odette, and KarlP.Sauvant, eds. The Third World Without Superpowers: The Collected Documents of the Non-Aligned Countries, Vols. I-V. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana, 1978.
    Jenner, RobertE.FDR's Republicans: Domestic Political Realignment and Foreign Policy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010.
    Jespersen, T.Christopher. American Images of China, 1931–1949. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.
    Johnson, RobertDavid. The Peace Progressives and American Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
    Jonas, Manfred. Isolationism in America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1967.tb01776.x
    Josephson, Harold. James T. Shotwell and the Rise of Internationalism in America. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1974.
    Kennan, GeorgeFrost. Russia and the West under Lenin and Stalin. Boston: Little, Brown, 1961.
    Kennedy, DavidM.Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    Kennedy, Greg. Anglo-American Strategic Relations and the Far East, 1933–1939. London: Frank Cass, 2002.
    Kent, Bruce. The Spoils of War: The Politics, Economics, and Diplomacy of Reparations, 1918–1932. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
    Keynes, JohnMaynard. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, 1920.
    Kimball, Warren. Cultural Internationalism and World Order. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
    Kimball, Warren. The Globalizing of America, 1913–1945. WarrenI.Cohen, ed. 4 vols. Vol. 3, Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
    Kimball, Warren. The Juggler: Franklin Roosevelt as Wartime Statesman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
    Kimball, Warren. The Origins of the Second World War in Asia and the Pacific. New York: Longmans, 1987.
    Kissinger, Henry. White House Years. Boston: Little, Brown, 1979.
    Krasner, StephenD.Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and United States Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.
    Kroes, Rob. “American Empire and Cultural Imperialism: A View from the Receiving End.” In Diplomatic History23, no. 3 (Summer 1999): 463–77.
    Kuisel, Richard. “Americanization for Historians.” In Diplomatic History24, no. 3 (Summer 2000): 509–15.
    LaFeber, Walter. The Clash: U.S.-Japanese Relations throughout History. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997.
    LaFeber, Walter. Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America.
    2nd ed.
    New York: W. W. Norton, 1993.
    Leffler, MelvynP.The Elusive Quest: America's Pursuit of European Stability and French Security, 1919–1933. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1979.
    Leffler, MelvynP.Expansionist Impulses and Domestic Constraints, 1921–1932.” In Economics and World Power, WilliamH.Becker and SamuelF.WellsJr., eds.: 225–76. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.
    Leffler, MelvynP.The Specter of Communism: The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1917–1953. New York: Hill & Wang, 1994.
    Leuchtenburg, WilliamE.The Perils of Prosperity, 1914–32. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
    Little, Douglas. “Antibolshevism and American Foreign Policy, 1919–1939: The Diplomacy of Self-Delusion.” In American Quarterly35, no. 4 (Fall 1983): 376–90.
    Louria, Margot. Triumph and Downfall: America's Pursuit of Peace and Prosperity, 1921–1933. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2001.
    Luce, Henry. “The American Century.” In Life Magazine, February 7, 1941. Reprinted in Diplomatic History 23, no. 2 (January 1999): 159–71.
    Lundestad, Geir. “‘Empire by Invitation’ in the Twentieth Century.” In Diplomatic History23, no. 2 (Spring 1999): 189–217.
    Lynch, Cecelia. Beyond Appeasement: Interpreting Interwar Peace Movements in World Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.
    Maddox, RobertJames. “Another Look at the Legend of Isolationism in the 1920s.” In Mid America, no. 53 (January 1971): 35–43.
    Mann, James. The Rebellion of Ronald Reagan: A History of the End of the Cold War. New York: Penguin, 2009.
    Masland, JohnW.The ‘Peace’ Groups Join Battle.” In Public Opinion Quarterly4, no. 4 (December 1940): 664–73.
    Maurer, JohnH.Arms Control and the Washington Conference.” In The Washington Conference, 1921–22: Naval Rivalry, East Asian Stability and the Road to Pearl Harbor, ErikGoldstein and JohnMaurer, eds.: 267–93. London: Frank Cass, 1994.
    McDonald, J.Kenneth. “The Washington Conference and the Naval Balance of Power, 1921–22.” In Maritime Strategy and the Balance of Power: Britain and America in the Twentieth Century, JohnB.Hattendorf and RobertS.Jordan, eds.: 189–213. New York: St. Martin's, 1989.
    Miller, KarenA.Populist Nationalism: Republican Insurgency and American Foreign Policy Making, 1918–1925. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999. Reprint, 1925.
    Moser, JohnE.Twisting the Lion's Tail: American Anglophobia between the World Wars. New York: New York University Press, 1999.http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230376762
    Murfett, Malcolm. “Look Back in Anger: The Western Powers and the Washington Conference of 1921–22.” In Arms Limitation and Disarmament: Restraints on War, 1899–1939, BrianJ. C.McKercher, ed.: 83–103. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992.
    National Security Directive 23,” September 22, 1989, The George Bush Presidential Library and Museum. http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/pdfs/nsd/nsd23.pdf (accessed May 22, 2011).
    National Security Review-3,” February 15, 1989, The George Bush Presidential Library and Museum. http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/pdfs/nsr/nsr3.pdf (accessed May 22, 2011).
    Nevins, Allan. The United States in a Chaotic World: A Chronicle of International Affairs, 1918–1933. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1950.
    Ninkovich, Frank, The United States and Imperialism. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470999042.ch6
    O'Brien, ThomasF.Making the Americas: The United States and Latin America from the Age of Revolutions to the Era of Globalization. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2007.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813%2883%2990090-3
    Palazchenko, Pavel. My Years with Gorbachev and Shevardnadze: The Memoirs of a Soviet Interpreter. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.
    Parrini, Carl. Heir to Empire: United States Economic Diplomacy, 1916–1923. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1969.
    Perlmutter, Amos. FDR and Stalin: A Not So Grand Alliance, 1943–1945. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1993.
    Phillips, Hugh. “Mission to America: Maksim M. Litvinov in the United States.” In Diplomatic History, no. 12 (Summer 1988): 261–76.
    Plesch, Dan. America, Hitler and the UN: How the Allies Won the War and Forged a Peace. New York: I. B. Tauris, 2010.
    Powaski, R.Toward an Entangling Alliance: American Isolationism and Europe, 1901–1950. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1991.
    Prashad, Vijay. The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World. New York: Free Press, 2007.
    Quint, HowardH., and RobertH.Ferrell, eds. The Talkative President: The Off-the-Record Press Conferences of Calvin Coolidge. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1964.
    Reagan, Ronald. “Address to the Nation and Other Countries on United States-Soviet Relations,” January 16, 1984, in The Public Papers of the Presidents, Ronald Reagan, 1984, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index (accessed May 12, 2011).
    Reagan, Ronald. “Memorandum of Conversation between Thatcher and Reagan,” December 28, 1985, The Margaret Thatcher Foundation. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/109185 (accessed May 4, 2011).
    Reagan, Ronald. The Reagan Diaries. DouglasBrinkley, ed. New York: Harper & Row, 2007.
    Reagan, Ronald. “Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session with the Students and Faculty at Moscow State University,” May 31, 1988, in The Public Papers of the Presidents, Ronald Reagan, 1988, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php (accessed May 20, 2011).
    Reagan, Bush, and Gorbachev at Governor's Island. The National Security Archive. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/index.html#Europe (accessed May 17, 2011).
    Renda, MaryA.Taking Haiti: Military Occupation and the Culture of U.S. Imperialism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001.
    Rhodes, BenjaminD.United States Foreign Policy in the Interwar Period, 1918–1941: The Golden Age of American Diplomatic and Military Complacency. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001.
    Reykjavik File. The National Security Archive. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/index.html#Europe (accessed May 7, 2011).
    Rofe, J.Simon. Franklin Roosevelt's Foreign Policy and the Welles Mission. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230604896
    Rosenberg, Emily. Financial Missionaries to the World: The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, 1900–1930. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.
    Rossini, Daniela, ed. From Theodore Roosevelt to FDR: Internationalism and Isolationism in American Foreign Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.
    Rupp, LeilaJ.Worlds of Women: The Making of an International Women's Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852009X458313
    Sainsbury, Keith. Churchill and Roosevelt at War: The War They Fought and the Peace They Hoped to Make. New York: New York University Press, 1994.
    Saul, NormanE.Friends or Foes? The United States and Soviet Russia, 1921–1941. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006.
    Schmitz, DavidF.Henry L. Stimson: The First Wise Man. Wilmington, DE: SR Books, 2001.
    Schmitz, DavidF.Triumph of Internationalism: Franklin D. Roosevelt and a World in Crisis, 1933–1941, Dulles, VA: Potomac Books, 2007.
    Schmitz, DavidF.The United States and Fascist Italy, 1922–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988.
    Schortemeier, FrederickE., ed. Rededicating America: Life and Recent Speeches of Warren G. Harding. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1920.
    Schoultz, Lars. Beneath the United States: A History of U.S. Policy toward Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
    Schuker, StephenA.American “Repatriations” to Germany, 1919–33: Implications for the Third-World Debt Crisis. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, 1988.
    Schuker, StephenA.The End of French Predominance in Europe: The Financial Crisis of 1924 and the Adoption of the Dawes Plan. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1976.
    Schulzinger, RobertD.The Making of the Diplomatic Mind: The Training, Outlook, and Style of United States Foreign Service Officers, 1908–1931. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1975.
    Schulzinger, RobertD.U.S. Diplomacy since 1900.
    6th ed.
    New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    Sherwin, MartinJ.A World Destroyed: The Atomic Bomb and the Grand Alliance. New York: Vintage Books, 1977.
    Shultz, George. Turmoil and Triumph: My Years as Secretary of State. New York: Charles Scribner's and Sons, 1993.
    Siegel, KatherineA.S.Loans and Legitimacy: The Evolution of Soviet-American Relations, 1919–1933. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1996.
    Small, Melvin. Democracy and Diplomacy: The Impact of Domestic Politics on U.S. Foreign Policy, 1789–1994. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
    Smith, Gaddis. American Diplomacy during the Second World War.
    2nd ed.
    New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985.
    Smith, RobertFreeman. “American Foreign Relations, 1920–1942.” In Towards a New Past: Dissenting Essays in American History, BartonJ.Bernstein, ed.: 232–62. New York: Pantheon, 1967.
    Smith, RobertFreeman. “Republican Policy and Pax Americana, 1921–1932.” In From Colony to Empire: Essays in the History of American Foreign Relations, WilliamApplemanWilliams, ed.: 253–92. New York: Wiley, 1972.
    Smith, RobertFreeman. The United States and Revolutionary Nationalism in Mexico, 1916–1932. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.
    Smith, Tony. America's Mission—The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.
    Steele, RichardW.The First Offensive 1942: Roosevelt, Marshall and the Making of American Strategy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973.
    Steiner, Zara. The Light That Failed: European International History 1919–1933. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198221142.001.0001
    Stimson, HenryL., and McGeorgeBundy. On Active Service in Peace and War. New York: Harper & Row, 1948.
    Stoler, MarkC.A Half Century of Conflict: Interpretations of U.S. World War II Diplomacy.” In Diplomatic History, no. 18 (Summer 1994): 375–403.
    Stone, RalphA.The Irreconcilables: The Fight against the League of Nations. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1970.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1902606
    Thatcher, Margaret. “Television Interview for the BBC,” December 17, 1984. The Margaret Thatcher Foundation. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/105592 (accessed May 1, 2011).
    Thorp, Rosemary. “Latin America and the International Economy from the First World War to the World Depression.” In The Cambridge History of Latin America Vol. 4, c. 1870 to 1930, LeslieBethell, ed.: 57–81. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
    Threlkeld, Megan. “The Pan American Conference of Women, 1922: Successful Suffragists Turn to International Relations.” In Diplomatic History31, no. 5 (November 2007): 801–28.
    de Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. New York: Langley, 1840.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118011690.ch12
    Trachtenberg, Marc. Reparation in World Politics: France and European Economic Diplomacy, 1916–1923. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.
    Trumpbour, John. Selling Hollywood to the World: U.S. and European Struggles for Mastery of the Global Film Industry, 1920–1950. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    Tulchin, JosephS.The Aftermath of War: World War I and U.S. Policy toward Latin America. New York: New York University Press, 1971.
    U.S. Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1942, Volume I, The British Commonwealth, the Far East. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1960.
    U.S. Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States: The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1961.
    U.S. Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States. The Conference of Berlin, 1945. 2 vols. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1960.
    Utley, JonathanG.Going to War with Japan, 1937–1941. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1985.
    Van Meter, RobertH., Jr.The Washington Conference of 1921–1922: A New Look.” In Pacific Historical Review46, no. 4 (November 1977): 603–24.
    Vinson, J.Chalmers. The Parchment Peace: The United States Senate and the Washington Conference, 1921–1922. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1955.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1892186
    Walker, ThomasW.Nicaragua: Living in the Shadow of the Eagle.
    4th ed.
    Boulder, CO: Westview, 2011.
    Walker, WilliamO.Crucible for Peace: Herbert Hoover, Modernization, and Economic Growth in Latin America.” In Diplomatic History30, no. 1 (January 2006): 83–117.
    Walton, Whitney. “Internationalism and the Junior Year Abroad: American Students in France in the 1920s and 1930s.” In Diplomatic History29, no. 2 (April 2005): 255–78.
    Watt, DonaldCameron. “American Isolationism in the 1920s. Is It a Useful Concept?” In Bulletin of the British Association of American Studies:3–19. London: British Association for American Studies, 1962.
    Weil, Martin. A Pretty Good Club: The Founding Fathers of the U.S. Foreign Service. New York: Norton, 1978.
    Weinberg, AlbertK.The Historical Meaning of the American Doctrine of Isolation.” In American Political Science Review34, no. 3 (June 1940): 539–47.
    Weissman, Benjamin. Herbert Hoover and Famine Relief to Soviet Russia, 1921–1923. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution, 1974.
    Welles, Sumner. Naboth's Vineyard: The Dominican Republic 1844–1924. Vol. 2. Mamaroneck, NY: Paul P. Appel, 1966.
    Westad, OddArne. The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817991
    White, ChristineA.British and American Commercial Relations with Soviet Russia, 1918–1924. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2499768
    Wilkins, Mira. The Maturing of Multinational Enterprise: American Business Abroad from 1914 to 1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.
    Williams, WilliamAppleman. “The Legend of Isolationism in the 1920s.” In Science and Society18, no. 1 (Winter 1954): 1–20.
    Wood, Bryce. The Making of the Good Neighbor Policy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1961.
    Zubok, VladisslavM.A Failed Empire: The Soviet Union in the Cold War from Stalin to Gorbachev. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.
    Part IV: Diplomacy Stretched to its Limits—the Early Cold War Era
    Acheson, DeanG.Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department. New York: W. W. Norton, 1969.
    Alexander, Bevin. Korea: The First War We Lost. New York: Hippocrene, 1986.http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/can.2005.0002
    Allen, Thomas. “No Winners, Many Losers: The End of the Korean War.” In Security in Korea: War, Stalemate, and Negotiation, PhilWilliams, DonaldM.Goldstein, and HenryL.AndrewsJr., eds.: 110–26. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1994.
    Ambrose, StephenE.Eisenhower, Vol. II: The President. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984.
    Anders, RogerM.The Atomic Bomb and the Korean War: Gordon Dean and the Issue of Civilian Control.” In Military Affairs52, no. 1 (January 1988): 1–6.
    Anderson, DavidL.Trapped by Success: The Eisenhower Administration and Vietnam, 1953–61. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.
    Appleman, RoyE., East of Chosin: Entrapment and Breakout in Korea. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1987.
    Appleman, RoyE., Escaping the Trap: The U.S. Army X Corps in Northeast Korea, 1950. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1987.
    Appleman, RoyE., Ridgway Duels for Korea. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1990.
    Appleman, RoyE., South of the Naktong, North to the Yalu (June-November 1950). Washington, DC: Center of Military History, 1961.
    Asselin, Pierre. “Choosing Peace: Hanoi and the Geneva Agreement on Vietnam, 1954–1955.” In Journal of Cold War Studies9, no. 2 (Spring 2007): 95–126.
    Associated Press. “Atomic Bomb Erased All Life in Hiroshima.” Miami Daily News, August 8, 1945: 1.
    Atkins, G.Pope. Encyclopedia of the Inter-American System. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1997.
    Attwood, William. The Reds and the Blacks: A Personal Adventure. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.
    Badash, Lawrence. Scientists and the Development of Nuclear Weapons: From Fission to the Limited Test Ban Treaty, 1939–1963. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 1998.
    Bailey, SydneyD.The Korean Armistice. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1992.
    Bajanov, Evgueni. “Assessing the Politics of the Korean War, 1949–1951.” In Cold War International History Project Bulletin, nos. 6–7 (Winter 1995/1996): 54, 87–91.
    Bates, MiltonJ., et al., eds. Reporting Vietnam: Part One: American Journalism 1959–1969. New York: Library of America, 1998.http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/FIL.2002.14.3-4.243
    Berger, Carl. The Korean Knot: A Military-Political History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1957.
    Bernstein, BartonJ.New Light on the Korean War.” In International History Review3, no. 2 (April 1981): 256–77.
    Bernstein, BartonJ.The Policy of Risk: Crossing the 38th Parallel and Marching to the Yalu.” In Foreign Service Journal, no. 54 (March 1977): 16–22, 29.
    Black, JanK.United States Penetration of Brazil. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977.
    Blair, Clay. The Forgotten War: America in Korea, 1950–1953. New York: Times Books, 1987.
    Bohlen, Charles. Witness to History, 1929–1969. New York: W. W. Norton, 1973.
    Boose, DonaldW., Jr.The Korean War Truce Talks: A Study in Conflict Termination.” In Parameters30, no. 1 (Spring 2000): 102–16.
    Boose, DonaldW., Jr.Portentous Sideshow: The Korean Occupation Decision.” In Parameters25, no. 4 (Winter 1995): 112–29.
    Borstelmann, Thomas. Apartheid's Reluctant Uncle: The United States and Southern Africa in the Early Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
    Borstelmann, Thomas. The Cold War and the Color Line: American Race Relations in the Global Arena. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
    Bradley, MarkPhilip. Vietnam at War. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/sear.2010.0021
    Brands, H.W., Jr.Into the Labyrinth: The United States and the Middle East, 1945–1993. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
    Brands, H.W., Jr.The Specter of Neutralism: The United States and the Emergence of the Third World, 1947–1960. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
    Brands, Hal. Latin America's Cold War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220094100450040109
    Buhite, RussellD.Douglas MacArthur: Statecraft and Stagecraft in America's East Asian Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
    Buhite, RussellD.‘Major Interests’: American Policy toward China, Taiwan, and Korea, 1945–1950.” In Pacific Historical Review47, no. 3 (August 1978): 425–51.
    Bundy, McGeorge. Danger and Survival: Choices about the Bomb in the First Fifty Years. New York: Random House, 1988.
    Calingaert, David. “Nuclear Weapons and the Korean War.” In Journal of Strategic Studies11, no. 2 (June 1988): 177–202.
    Caridi, RonaldJ.The Korean War and American Politics: The Republican Party as a Case Study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1968.
    Casey, Steven. Selling the Korean War: Propaganda, Politics, and Public Opinion in the United States, 1950–1953. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306927.001.0001
    Catton, Philip. Diem's Final Failure: Prelude to America's War in Vietnam. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002.
    Chang, Laurence, and PeterKornbluh, eds. The Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962: A National Security Archive Documents Reader. New York: The New Press, 1992.
    Chapman, JessicaM.The Sect Crisis of 1955 and the American Commitment to Ngô Đình Diêm.” In Journal of Vietnamese Studies5, no. 1 (February 2010): 37–85.
    ChenJian. China's Road to the Korean War: The Making of the Sino-American Confrontation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521837194.012
    Childs, Marquis. “Atomic Bomb Marks Beginning—or End.” Miami Daily News, August 7, 1945: 6–A.
    Cho, SoonSung. Korea in World Politics, 1940–1950: An Evaluation of American Responsibility. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
    Clark, MarkW.From the Danube to the Yalu. New York: Harper & Row, 1954.
    Clemens, Peter. “Captain James Hausman, U.S. Army Military Advisor to Korea, 1946–1948: The Intelligent Man on the Spot.” In Journal of Strategic Studies25, no. 1 (March 2002): 163–98.
    Cockcroft, JamesD.Latin America: History, Politics, and U.S. Policy.
    2nd ed.
    Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning, 1996.
    Coll, Steve. Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001. New York: Penguin, 2004.
    Collins, J.Lawton. War in Peacetime: The History and Lessons of the Korean War. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1969.
    Condit, Doris. History of the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Vol. 2: The Test of War, 1950–1953. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 1988.
    Cowell, Alan. “Guinea Is Slowly Breaking Out of Its Tight Cocoon.” In The New York Times, December 3, 1982.
    Cowell, Alan. “In Revolutionary Guinea, Some of the Fire Is Gone.” In The New York Times, December 9, 1982.
    Craig, Campbell. Destroying the Village: Eisenhower and Thermonuclear War. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
    Craig, Campbell. and FredrikLogevall. America's Cold War: The Politics of Insecurity. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ahr.112.4.1211
    Craig, Campbell. and SergeyRadchenko. The Atomic Bomb and the Origins of the Cold War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.
    Crane, Conrad. “‘No Practical Capabilities’: American Biological and Chemical Warfare Programs During the Korean War.” In Perspectives in Biology and Medicine45, no. 2 (Spring 2002): 41–49.
    Crane, Conrad. “To Avert Impending Disaster: American Military Plans to Use Atomic Weapons during the Korean War.” In Journal of Strategic Studies23, no. 2 (June 2000): 72–88.
    Cullather, Nick. The Hungry World: America's Cold War Battle against Poverty in Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
    Cumings, Bruce, ed. Child of Conflict: The Korean-American Relationship, 1943–1953. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1983.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01720.x
    Cumings, BruceThe Origins of the Korean War. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981, 1990.
    Dingman, Roger. “Atomic Diplomacy during the Korean War.” In International Security13, no. 3 (Winter 1988/1989): 61–89.
    Divine, RobertA.Eisenhower and the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
    Dobbs, Michael. One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008.
    Donovan, Robert. Conflict and Crisis: The Presidency of Harry S Truman, 1945–1948. New York: W. W. Norton, 1977.
    Donovan, Robert. Tumultuous Years: The Presidency of Harry S Truman, 1949–1953. New York: Norton, 1952.
    Dower, JohnW.War without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War. New York: Random House, 1986.
    Dudziak, MaryL.Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
    Dulles Shifts on Neutrality.” In The Washington Post, July 12, 1956: 8.
    Eden, Lynn. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1955484
    Editorial. “Neutral Is Left.” In National Review31, no. 39 (September 28, 1979): 1197.
    Eisenhower, DwightD.The White House Years. Vol. I: Mandate for Change, 1953–1956. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1963.
    Ekbladh, David. The Great American Mission: Modernization and the Construction of an American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
    Endicott, Stephen, and EdwardHagerman. The United States and Biological Warfare: Secrets from the Early Cold War and Korea. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.
    Fehrenbach, T.R.This Kind of War: A Study of Unpreparedness. New York: Macmillan, 1963.
    Foot, RosemaryJ.Nuclear Coercion and the Ending of the Korean Conflict.” In International Security13, no. 3 (Winter 1988/1989): 92–112.
    Foot, RosemaryJ.A Substitute for Victory: The Politics of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.
    Foot, RosemaryJ.The Wrong War: American Policy and the Dimensions of the Korean Conflict, 1950–1953. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.
    Friedman, Edward. “Nuclear Blackmail and the End of the Korean War.” In Modern China1, no. 1 (January 1975): 75–91.
    Fursenko, Aleksandr, and TimothyNaftali. Khrushchev's Cold War: The Inside Story of an American Adversary. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.
    Gaddis, JohnLewis. The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
    Gaddis, JohnLewis. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War.
    #1
    New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481%2807%2932021-7
    Gaddis, JohnLewis. The United States and the Origins of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.
    Gaddis, JohnLewis. We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
    Gallicchio, Marc. The Scramble for Asia: U.S. Military Power in the Aftermath of the Pacific War. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
    Gasiorowski, MarkJ.U.S. Foreign Policy and the Shah: Building a Client State in Iran. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.
    Gittings, John. “Talks, Bombs and Germs: Another Look at the Korean War.” In Journal of Contemporary Asia5, no. 2 (Spring 1975): 205–17.
    Gleijeses, Piero. Shattered Hope: The Guatemalan Revolution and the United States, 1944–1954. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
    Goncharov, SergeiN., JohnW.Lewis, and XueLitai. Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao, and the Korean War. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.
    Goodman, AllenE., ed. Negotiating while Fighting: The Diary of Admiral C. Turner Joy at the Korean Armistice Negotiations. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution, 1978.
    Goodrich, LelandM.Korea: A Study of U.S. Policy in the United Nations. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1956.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/599626
    Hahn, PeterL.Caught in the Middle East: U.S. Policy toward the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1945–1961. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004.
    Hahn, PeterL.Crisis and Crossfire: The United States and the Middle East since 1945. Washington, DC: Potomac Books, 2005.
    Hahn, PeterL.The United States, Great Britain, and Egypt, 1945–1956: Strategy and Diplomacy in the Early Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.
    Halberstam, David. The Best and the Brightest. New York: Random House, 1969.
    Halliday, Jon, and BruceCumings. Korea: The Unknown War. New York: Pantheon, 1988.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14672715.1979.10424021
    HaoYufan and ZhaiZhihai. “China's Decision to Enter the Korean War: History Revisited.” In The China Quarterly, no. 121 (March 1990): 94–115.
    HarryS.TrumanLibrary and Museum. “Proclamation 2914.” http://www.trumanlibrary.org/proclamations/index.php?pid=473&st=&st1=.
    Hasegawa, Tsuyoshi. Racing the Enemy: Stalin, Truman, and the Surrender of Japan. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.
    Hastings, Max. The Korean War. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987.
    Haynes, JohnEarl, and HarveyKlehr. The Soviet World of American Communism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
    Haynes, JohnEarl, and HarveyKlehr. Venona: Decoding Soviet Espionage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01986347
    Heinl, RobertD.Victory at High Tide: The Inchon-Seoul Campaign. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1968.
    Heiss, MaryAnn. Empire and Nationhood: The United States, Great Britain, and Iranian Oil, 1950–1954. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.
    Henderson, Gregory. Korea: The Politics of the Vortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.
    Hermes, WalterG., Jr.Truce Tent and Fighting Front. Washington, DC: Center of Military History, 1966.
    Herring, GeorgeC.America's Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975.
    4th ed.
    New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
    Herring, GeorgeC.From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    Hewlett, RichardG., and JackM.Holl. Atoms for Peace and War, 1953–1961: Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.16414
    Higgins, Trumbull. Truman and the Fall of MacArthur: A Precis on Limited War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1960.
    Holloway, David. Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1939–1956. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.17834
    Hunt, MichaelH.Beijing and the Korean Crisis, June 1950-June 1951.” In Political Science Quarterly107, no. 3 (Fall 1992): 453–78.
    Hunt, MichaelH.A Vietnam Reader: A Documentary History from American and Vietnamese Perspectives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010.
    Immerman, Richard. The CIA in Guatemala: The Foreign Policy of Intervention. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2651701
    Isaacson, Walter, and EvanThomas. Kissinger: A Biography. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.
    Isaacson, Walter, and EvanThomas. The Wise Men: Six Friends and the World They Made. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1997.
    Jacobs, Seth. America's Miracle Man in Vietnam: Ngo Dinh Diem, Religion, Race, and U.S. Intervention in Southeast Asia, 1950–1957. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/vs.2006.1.1-2.503
    James, D.Clayton. The Years of MacArthur, Vol. III: Triumph and Disaster, 1945–1964. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1985.
    Jankowitsch, Odette, and KarlP.Sauvant, eds. The Third World without Superpowers: The Collected Documents of the Non-Aligned Countries. Vols. I-V. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana, 1978.
    Jervis, Robert. “The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War.” In Journal of Conflict Resolution24, no. 4 (December 1980): 563–92.
    Jones, Howard. Death of a Generation: How the Assassinations of Diem and JFK Prolonged the Vietnam War. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176056.001.0001
    Joseph, GilbertM., and DanielaSpenser, eds. In from the Cold: Latin America's New Encounter with the Cold War. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v078n040.p047
    Joy, C.Turner. How Communists Negotiate. New York: Macmillan, 1955.
    Kaufman, BurtonI.The Korean Conflict. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999.
    Kaufman, BurtonI.The Korean War: Challenges in Crisis, Credibility, and Command. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986.
    Keefer, EdwardC.President Dwight D. Eisenhower and the End of the Korean War.” In Diplomatic History10, no. 3 (Summer 1986): 267–89.
    Kennan, George. Memoirs, 1925–1950. New York: Pantheon, 1983.
    Kennan, George. Memoirs, 1950–1963. New York: Pantheon, 1983.
    Kissinger, Henry. White House Years. Boston: Little, Brown, 1979.
    Kuniholm, BruceR.The Origins of the Cold War in the Near East: Great Power Conflict and Diplomacy in Iran, Turkey, and Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.
    LaFeber, Walter. “Crossing the 38th: The Cold War in Microcosm.” In Reflections on the Cold War: A Quarter Century of American Foreign Policy, LynnH.Miller and RonaldW.Pruessen, eds.: 71–90. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1974.
    LaFeber, Walter. Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America.
    2nd ed.
    New York: W. W. Norton, 1993.
    Langley, LesterD.America and the Americas: The United States in the Western Hemisphere.
    2nd ed.
    Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2010.
    Lawrence, MarkAtwood. The Vietnam War: A Concise International History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14736480208404633
    Leffler, Melvyn. A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.
    Leffler, Melvyn. The Specter of Communism: The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1917–1953. New York: Hill & Wang, 1994.
    Leitenberg, Milton. “The Korean War Biological Weapon Allegations: Additional Information and Disclosures.” In Asian Perspective24, no. 3 (2000): 159–72.
    Lichterman, Martin. “To the Yalu and Back.” In American Civil-Military Decisions: A Book of Case Studies, HaroldStein, ed.: 569–642. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1963.
    Little, Douglas. American Orientalism: The United States and the Middle East since 1945. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.
    Logevall, Fredrik. The Origins of the Vietnam War. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, 2001.
    Longley, Kyle. In the Eagle's Shadow: The United States and Latin America.
    2nd ed.
    Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson, 2009.
    Longley, Kyle. The Sparrow and the Hawk: Costa Rica and the United States during the Rise of José Figueres. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1997.
    Louis, Wm.Roger. The British Empire in the Middle East, 1945–1951: Arab Nationalism, the United States, and Postwar Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.
    MacArthur, Douglas. Reminiscences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.14.120180.000245
    MacDonald, CallumA.Korea: The War before Vietnam. New York: The Free Press, 1986.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00927678.1981.10553736
    Macdonald, DonaldStone. The Koreans: Contemporary Politics and Society. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1988.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357715008443751
    Mahoney, RichardD.JFK: Ordeal in Africa. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
    Malloy, SeanL.A ‘Paper Tiger?’: Nuclear Weapons, Atomic Diplomacy and the Korean War.” In The New England Journal of History, no. 60 (Fall 2003-Spring 2004): 227–52.
    Mandelbaum, Michael. The Nuclear Question: The United States and Nuclear Weapons, 1946–1976. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
    Mart, Michelle. Eye on Israel: How America Came to View Israel as an Ally. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006.
    Martini, EdwinA.Invisible Enemies: The American War on Vietnam, 1975–2000. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2007.
    Massie, RobertK.Loosing the Bonds: The United States and South Africa in the Apartheid Years. New York: Doubleday, 1997.
    Mastny, Vojtech. “The Soviet Union's Partnership with India.” In Journal of Cold War Studies12, no. 3: 50–90.http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/JCWS_a_00006
    Matray, JamesI.Dean Acheson's National Press Club Speech Reexamined.” In Journal of Conflict Studies22, no. 1 (Spring 2002): 28–55.
    Matray, JamesI.Hodge Podge: U.S. Occupation Policy in Korea, 1945–1948.” In Korean Studies, no. 19 (1995): 17–38.
    Matray, JamesI.Truman's Plan for Victory: National Self-Determination and the Thirty-Eighth Parallel Decision in Korea.” In Journal of American History66: no. 2 (September 1979): 314–33.
    May, ErnestR.Lessons of the Past”: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6749%2882%2980001-8
    McCormack, Gavan. Cold War/Hot War. Sydney, NSW: Hale and Iremonger, 1983.
    McCullough, David. Truman. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002204690001839X
    McCune, GeorgeM., and ArthurL.GreyJr.Korea Today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950.
    McGlothen, RonaldL.Controlling the Waves: Dean Acheson and U.S. Policy in East Asia. New York: Norton, 1993.
    McMahon, RobertJ.The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1995.10505743
    McMahon, RobertJ.Cold War on the Periphery: The United States, India, and Pakistan. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
    McMahon, RobertJ.The Limits of Empire: The United States and Southeast Asia since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.
    Meade, E.Grant. American Military Government in Korea. New York: King's Crown, 1951.
    Memorandum, DavidNewsom to HenryKissinger, October 5, 1973, in Department of State, FRUS, 1969–1976, Vol. E-6, Documents on Africa, 1973–1976, doc. 11, http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve06/d11.
    Memorandum, G. Mennen Williams to Dean Rusk, November 23, 1963, in Department of State, FRUS, 1961–1963, Vol. 21, Africa. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1995: 338–40.
    Memorandum, Robert Komer to McGeorge Bundy, January 16, 1963, in Department of State, FRUS, 1961–1963, Vol. 23: Southeast Asia. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1995: 656–58.
    Memorandum of Conversation, May 27, 1970, in Department of State, FRUS, 1969–1976, Vol. 20, Southeast Asia, 1969–1972. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2006: 642–45.
    Millett, AllanR.Captain James H. Hausman and the Formation of the Korean Army, 1945–1950.” In Armed Forces and Society23, no. 4 (Summer 1997): 503–39.
    Millett, AllanR.The War for Korea, 1945–1950: A House Burning. Lawrence: University of Press Kansas, 2005.
    Millett, AllanR.The War for Korea, 1950–1951: They Came from the North. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2010.
    Morgan, Joseph. The Vietnam Lobby: The American Friends of Vietnam, 1955–1975. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997.
    Mossman, BillyC.Ebb and Flow: November 1950-July 1951. Washington, DC: Center of Military History, 1990.
    National Security Archive. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv.
    Nehru, Jawaharlal. India's Foreign Policy: Selected Speeches, September 1946-April 1961. New Delhi: Ministry of Information, 1961.
    Newsom, David. The Imperial Mantle: The United States, Decolonization, and the Third World. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 2001.
    Nicosia, Gerald. Home to War: A History of the Vietnam Veterans Movement. New York: Crown, 2001.
    Noer, ThomasJ.Cold War and Black Liberation: The United States and White Rule in Africa, 1948–1968. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1985.
    Offner, Arnold. Another Such Victory: President Truman and the Cold War, 1945–1953. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0360-4918.2004.230_8.x
    Bonnie, B.C., ed. Korea under the American Military Government, 1945–1948. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002.
    Olmsted, Kathryn. Red Spy Queen: A Biography of Elizabeth Bentley. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.
    Osgood, Kenneth. Total Cold War: Eisenhower's Secret Propaganda Battle at Home and Abroad. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006.
    Oshinsky, David. A Conspiracy So Immense: The World of Joseph McCarthy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
    Paige, GlennD.The Korean Decision, June 24–30, 1950. New York: Free Press, 1968.
    Paterson, ThomasG.On Every Front: The Making of the Cold War. New York: W. W. Norton, 1979.
    Patterson, James. Grand Expectations: The United States, 1945–1974. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
    Pearlman, MichaelD.Truman and MacArthur: Policy, Politics, and the Hunger for Honor and Renown. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.
    Perret, Geoffrey. Old Soldiers Never Die: The Life of Douglas MacArthur. New York: Random House, 1996.
    Pierpaoli, PaulG., Jr.Truman and Korea: The Political Culture of the Early Cold War. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1999.
    Pollack, JonathanD.The Korean War and Sino-American Relations.” In Sino-American Relations, 1945–1955, HarryHarding and YuanMing, eds.: 213–37. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1989.
    Prashad, Vijay. The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World. New York: Free Press, 2007.
    Public Papers of the Presidents. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
    Rabe, StephenG.The Most Dangerous Area in the World: John F. Kennedy Confronts Communist Revolution in Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999.
    Radosh, Ronald, and JoyceMilton. The Rosenberg File: A Search for the Truth. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1983.
    Reagan, Ronald. “Remarks to Members of the World Affairs Council and the Foreign Policy Association,” July 22, 1986, in Public Papers of the Presidents, Ronald Reagan, 1986, Book II—June 28 to December 31, 1986, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1989: 948–88.
    Rees, David. Korea: The Limited War. New York: Macmillan, 1964.http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1955.02960110076020
    Rhodes, Richard. Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995.
    Rhodes, Richard. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2811681
    Ridgway, MatthewB.The Korean War. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1983624
    Roberts, Sam. The Brother: The Untold Story of Atomic Spy David Greenglass and How He Sent His Sister, Ethel Rosenberg, to the Electric Chair. New York: Random House, 2001.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00084.x
    Rotter, AndrewJ.Comrades at Odds: The United States and India, 1947–1964. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.
    Rotter, AndrewJ.. The Path to Vietnam: Origins of the American Commitment to Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987.
    Rovere, Richard, and ArthurM.SchlesingerJr. The General and the President and the Future of American Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1951.
    Rubin, Barry. Paved with Good Intentions: The American Experience and Iran. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
    Ruetten, RichardT.General Douglas MacArthur's ‘Reconnaissance in Force’: The Rationalization of a Defeat in Korea.” In Pacific Historical Review36, no. 1 (February 1967): 79–94.
    Sandusky, MichaelC.America's Parallel. Alexandria, VA: Old Dominion, 1983.
    Sawyer, RobertK., and WalterG.HermesJr.Military Advisors in Korea: KMAG in War and Peace. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, 1962.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1984729
    Schaller, Michael. Douglas MacArthur: The Far Eastern General. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
    Schlesinger, ArthurM.Journals: 1952–2000. New York: Penguin, 2007.
    Schlesinger, ArthurM.A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1969.
    Schmidt, Elizabeth. Cold War and Decolonization in Guinea, 1946–1958. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2007.
    Schmitz, DavidF.The United States and Right-Wing Dictatorships. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819971
    Schnabel, JamesF.Policy and Direction: The First Year. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, 1972.http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0134-5.ch013
    Schnabel, JamesF. and RobertJ.Watson. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy, Vol. III: The Korean War. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1979.
    Schrecker, Ellen. Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. New York: Little, Brown, 1998.
    Schulzinger, RobertD.A Time for War: The United States and Vietnam, 1941–1975. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/jipe.1940.0024
    Shaw, Tony. Hollywood's Cold War. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2007.http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748625239.001.0001
    ShenZhihua. “China and the Dispatch of the Soviet Air Force: The Formation of the Chinese-Soviet-Korean Alliance in the Early Stage of the Korean War.” In Journal of Strategic Studies33, no. 2 (April 2010): 211–30.
    ShenZhihua. “Sino-Soviet Relations and the Origins of the Korean War.” In Journal of Cold War Studies2, no. 2 (Spring 2000): 44–68.
    Sheng, MichaelM.Battling Western Imperialism: Mao, Stalin, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.
    Sherwin, MartinJ., and KaiBird. American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005.
    Sibley, Katherine. Red Spies in America: Stolen Secrets and the Dawn of the Cold War. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2004.
    Simmons, RobertR.The Strained Alliance: Peking, Pyongyang, Moscow and the Politics of the Korean Civil War. New York: Free Press, 1975.
    Simpson, BradleyR.Economists with Guns: Authoritarian Development and U.S.-Indonesian Relations, 1960–1968. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.
    Smith, PeterH.Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics of U.S.-Latin American Relations.
    2nd ed.
    New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
    Smoke, Richard. National Security and the Nuclear Dilemma: An Introduction to the American Experience.
    2nd ed.
    New York: Random House, 1987.
    Spanier, JohnW.The Truman-MacArthur Controversy and the Korean War. New York: W. W. Norton, 1959.
    Spurr, Russell. Enter the Dragon: China's Undeclared War against the U.S. in Korea, 1950–1951. New York: Newmarket, 1988.
    Stanley, ElizabethA.Paths to Peace: Domestic Coalition Shifts, War Termination and the Korean War. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.
    Stueck, William. The Korean War: An International History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1986.tb00462.x
    Stueck, William., ed. The Korean War in World History. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2004.
    Stueck, William. Rethinking the Korean War: A New Diplomatic and Strategic History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
    Stueck, William. The Road to Confrontation: American Policy toward China and Korea, 1947–1950. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981.
    Taffet, JeffreyF.Foreign Aid as Foreign Policy: The Alliance for Progress in Latin America. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2007.
    Telegram 1120, Cairo to Washington, February 6, 1955, in Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1955–1957, Vol. 12, Near East Region; Iran; Iraq. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1991: 15–16.
    Telegram 1579, Jakarta to State Department, December 6, 1975, National Security Archive. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB62/doc4.pdf.
    Telegram 104050, State Department to All Diplomatic Posts, May 17, 1974, in Department of State, FRUS, 1969–1976 Vol. E-14, Part1, Documents on the United Nations, 1973–1976, Doc. 14. http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve14p1/d14.
    Truman, HarryS.Foreign Relations of the United States. The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran 1943. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1961.
    Truman, HarryS.Memoirs. 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1955, 1956.
    Truman, HarryS.1950. Vol. VII: Korea. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1976.
    Truman, HarryS.1951 Vol. VII: Korea and China. Part 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1983.
    Truman, HarryS.1952–1954. Vol. XV: Korea. 2 parts. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1984.
    Tulchin, Joseph. Argentina and the United States: A Conflicted Relationship. Boston: Twayne's, 1990.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050627408434396
    United Nations. International Statistical Yearbook 2007. New York: United Nations Statistical Office, 2008.
    United Nations. Yearbook of International Trade Statistics. New York: United Nations Statistical Office, various years.
    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. World Investment Report. Geneva: UNCTAD, various years.
    Usdin, Steve. Engineering Communism: How Two Americans Spied for Stalin's Secret Service and Founded the Soviet Silicon Valley. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.
    Vatcher, WilliamH., Jr.Panmunjom: The Story of the Korean Military Armistice Negotiations. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1958.
    Walker, J.Samuel. Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of the Atomic Bombs against Japan.
    #1
    Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004.
    Weathersby, Kathryn. “Deceiving the Deceivers: Moscow, Beijing, Pyongyang, and the Allegations of Bacteriological Weapons Use in Korea.” In Cold War International History Project Bulletin, no. 11 (Winter 1998): 176–85.
    Weathersby, Kathryn. “Korea, 1949–50: To Attack or Not to Attack: Stalin, Kim Il Sung, and the Prelude to War.” In Cold War International History Project Bulletin, no. 5 (Spring 1995): 1–9.
    Weathersby, Kathryn. “New Findings on the Korean War: Translation and ‘Commentary.” In Cold War International History Project Bulletin, no. 3 (Fall 1993): 1, 14–18.
    Weathersby, Kathryn. “The Soviet Role in the Early Phase of the Korean War: New Documentary Evidence.” In Journal of American-East Asian Relations2, no. 4 (Winter 1993): 425–58.
    Weinraub, Bernard. “Reagan in Toast to Suharto Names an Envoy.” In The New York Times, October 13, 1982.
    Weinstein, Allen. The Haunted Wood: Soviet Espionage in America—The Soviet Era. New York: Random House, 1999.
    Weinstein, Allen. Perjury: The Hiss-Chambers Case. New York: Vintage Books, 1978.
    Weintraub, Stanley. MacArthur's War: Korea and the Undoing of an American Hero. New York: Free Press, 2000.
    Wenger, Andreas. Living with Peril: Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Nuclear Weapons. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.
    Westad, OddArne. The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817991
    White, G.Edward. Alger Hiss's Looking Glass Wars. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
    Whiting, AllenS.China Crosses the Yalu: The Decision to Enter the Korean War. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1970.
    Wilkinson, MarkF., ed. The Korean War at Fifty: International Perspectives. Lexington: Virginia Military Institute, 2004.
    Williams, WilliamAppleman. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy. New York: W. W. Norton, 1988.
    Williams, WilliamJ., ed. A Revolutionary War: Korea and the Transformation of the Postwar World. Chicago: Imprint, 1993.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094582X08325955
    Winham, GilbertR.The Evolution of the Global Trade Regime.” In Global Political Economy3, JohnRavenhill, ed.: 137–72. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
    Winkler, AllanM.Life under a Cloud: American Anxiety about the Atom. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
    Wittner, LawrenceS.The Struggle against the Bomb. 3 vols. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993–2003.
    XiaYafeng. Negotiating with the Enemy: U.S.-China Talks during the Cold War, 1949–1972. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006.
    Young, MarilynB.The Vietnam Wars, 1945–1990. New York: HarperCollins, 1991.
    Zeiler, ThomasW.Unconditional Defeat: Japan, America, and the End of World War II. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 2004.
    ZhangShu Guang. Mao's Military Romanticism: China and the Korean War, 1950–53. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.
    Part V: The End of the Cold War
    Ahmed, NafeezMosaddeq. Behind the War on Terror: Western Secret Strategy and the Struggle for Iraq. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society, 2003.
    American Embassy in Riyadh. Telegram to Secretary of State. “Examining Our Military Options.” October 29, 1990. Folder, “Working Files-Iraq, 10/90” OA/ID CF1478 [2 of 6]. Richard Haass. Subject File. National Security Council Bush Presidential Records. George Bush Presidential Library.
    Anderson, Martin, and AnneliseAnderson. Reagan's Secret War: The Untold Story of His Fight to Save the World from Nuclear Disaster. New York: Crown, 2009.
    Andrianopoulos, GerryA.Kissinger and Brzezinski. The NSC and the Struggle for Control of U. S. National Security Policy. New York: Macmillan, 1991.
    Armbrister, Trevor. A Matter of Accountability: The True Story of the Pueblo Affair.
    2nd ed.
    Guilford, CT: Lyons, 2004.
    Aslund, Anders. How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
    Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Rubottom), Memo to the Under Secretary of State (Dillion), December 29, 1959. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1958–1960, Volume VI, Cuba, Document 414. http://history.state.gov/historicaldoc-uments/frus1958-60v06/d414
    Baker, JamesA.The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War & Peace, 1989–1992. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1995.
    Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro (BNL). [n.d.] Folder, “USDAGSM 102–3 Credits to Iraq.” OA/ID 06375. Files of Clair Sechler, Cabinet Affairs, Bush Presidential Records. George Bush Presidential Library.
    Berend, IvanT.From the Soviet Bloc to the European Union. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806995
    Bianco, Mirella. Gadafi: Voice from the Desert. MargaretLyle, trans. New York: Longmans, 1975.
    Bitar, Salah. Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations (Hammarskjold), October 15, 1957. In The Arab States and the Arab League: A Documentary Record Vol. II International Affairs, MuhammadKhalil, ed.: 342–43. Beirut: Khayats, 1962.
    Building Up Our Deterrent Capabilities. [n.d.], Folder, “Meetings NSC 293: 325–80.” Box 32. Files: Brzezinski collection. Jimmy Carter Presidential Library.
    Bundy, William. A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency. New York: Hill & Wang, 1998.
    Burnett, StantonH.Memo to the Director and Deputy Director. April 15, 1986. Folder, “Libya: USIA.” Box 30, Oliver L. North Files. Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.
    Burr, William, ed. The Kissinger Transcripts: The Top Secret Talks with Beijing and Moscow. New York: New Press, 1999.
    Bush, GeorgeH.W.Address before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union,” January 28, 1992. The American Presidency Project [online]. Santa Barbara, CA. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=20544&st=grace+of+god&st1=#axzz1NhfY.
    Bush, GeorgeH.W. Memo of National Security Directive 26 to the Vice President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, The Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Energy, the Director of the OMB, the Assista