Herring v. United States (2009)

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Entry
  • Entries A-Z
  • Subject Index

  • In Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the exclusionary rule, which prohibits illegally seized evidence from being admitted at trial, does not apply to evidence illegally seized by officers who reasonably rely on ...

    Looks like you do not have access to this content.

    Login

    Don’t know how to login?

    Click here for free trial login.

    • [0-9]
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • U
    • V
    • W
    • X
    • Y
    • Z


      • Loading...
    Back to Top

    Copy and paste the following HTML into your website