American Political Parties: Decline or Resurgence?
Publication Year: 2001
Powerful cross-currents of both decline and resurgence have been affecting American political parties over the past several decades. Is the era of decline that began in the late 1960s over and are the parties in a new era of rebuilding? In what direction are the parties headed and what does it mean for a healthy and well-functioning democracy? American Political Parties brings together a distinguished team of contributors to explore these questions. Students are exposed to original, “state-of-the-art” research on the parties that is written to be accessible and engaging.Presenting both historical and contemporary material on the changing U.S. parties, the book offers a balanced portrait and a wide variety of views concerning the continuing weaknesses of the parties and their concurrent signs of revitalization. ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
Part One: The Parties in the Mass Public
- Chapter 1: Presidential Election Campaigns and Partisanship
- Chapter 2: On the Resurgence of Party Identification in the 1990s
- Chapter 3: Evidence of Increasing Polarization among Ordinary Citizens
- Chapter 4: Party Politics and Personal Democracy
Part Two: The Parties as Electoral Organizations
- Chapter 5: American Political Parties: Still Central to a Functioning Democracy?
- Chapter 6: Policy Coherence in Political Parties: The Elections of 1984, 1988, and 1992
- Chapter 7: Parties and Campaign Finance
- Chapter 8: Party Responsibility and the Future of American Democracy
Part Three: The Parties as Governing Institutions
To Robert Himmelberg, for his support, encouragement, and leadership
A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc.
1414 22nd Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
(202) 822-1475; (800) 638-1710
Copyright © 2001 by Congressional Quarterly Inc.
Printed and bound in the United States of America
05 04 03 02 01 5 4 3 2 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Tables and Figures[Page v]Tables
- 1-1 Partisan Loyalty in Presidential Voting, by Time of Vote Decision, 1952–1996 17
- 1-2 Partisan Loyalty Among Late-Deciding Partisans Who Had Stable Preferences During the Campaign, 1952–1996 20
- 1-3 Partisan Loyalty Among Late-Deciding Partisans Who Changed Preferences During the Campaign, 1952–1996 22
- 1-4 Partisan Loyalty Rates Based on the Vote Intentions and Reported Votes of Party Identifiers Who Changed Their Votes from Their Preelection Vote Intentions, 1952–1996 23
- 2-1 Trends in Strength of Partisanship, 1952–1996 33
- 2-2 Party Identification and the Vote Choice, 1952–1996 36
- 5-1 Contact by Party Committees 112
- 5-2 Total Contacts by Party Committees 113
- 5-3 Correlations with Likelihood of Running in 1998 114
- 6-1 Activists' Ideological and Issue Positions 130
- 6-2 Party Identifiers' Ideological and Issue Positions 131
- 6-3 Ideological and Issue Positioning of Activists and Members, by Party 132
- 6-4 Policy Coherence Between Activists and Mass Party Members, by Year and Party 132
- 6-5 Party Votes on Budgetary Resolutions, 1985–1996 133
- 6-6 Party Voting for President's Programs, 1985–1996 134
- 6-7 Party Unity Scores in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, 1985–1996 135
- 7-1 National Party Hard Money Receipts, 1976–1998 142
- 7-2 Federal Campaign Contribution Limits 144
- 7-3 National Party Soft Money Receipts, 1992–1998 147
- 8-1 Status of the Recommendations of the APSA's 1950 Committee on Political Parties 166
- 8-2 Retrospective Judgment in the 1996 Election 176
- 9-1 Seniority Before and After 1900 190
- 10-1 Size of the Policy Agenda, 1947–1996 212
- 10-2 Determinants of Policy Gridlock, 1951–1996 224
- 2-1 National Election Study Party Identification Scale 32
- 2-2 Party and Issues: Cross-Pressures, 1952–1996 41
- 2-3 Resolution of Cross-Pressures: Party and Vote, 1952–1996 44
- 2-4 Party and Candidates: Cross-Pressures, 1952–1996 47
- 2-5 Resolution of Cross-Pressures: Party and Candidate Orientation, 1952–1996 48
- 2-6 Impact of Party Identification on Vote Choice, 1952–1996 49
- 2-7 Impact of Party Identification on Vote Choice: Different Strengths of Partisanship, 1952–1996 51
- 3-1 Party Polarization on Parties and Candidates, 1968–1996 60
- 3-2 Democratic and Republican Identifiers' Evaluations of Own and Opposition Parties, 1968–1996 62
- 3-3 Party Polarization on Issues and Ideology, 1972–1996 64
- 3-4 Difference in Presidential Approval of Democrats and Republicans, 1953–1996 66
- 3-5 Partisan Differences in the Evaluation of Candidates and Parties, by Strength of Partisan Identification, 1968–1996 68
- 3-6 Partisan Differences in Issues and Ideology, by Strength of Partisan Identification, 1972–1996 69
- 3-7 Partisan Differences in the Evaluation of Candidates and Parties, by Region, 1968–1996 70
- 3-8 Partisan Differences in Issues and Ideology, by Region, 1972–1996 71
- 3-9 Partisan Differences in the Evaluation of Candidates and Parties, by New Deal/Post-New Deal, 1968–1996 72
- 3-10 Partisan Differences in Issues and Ideology, by New Deal/Post-New Deal, 1972–1996 73
- 8-1 Content of Democratic Platforms 171
- 8-2 1996 Platform Fulfillment 172
- 8-3 Perceptions of Party Differences 173
- 8-4 Sources of Partisanship 175
- 10-1 Level of Policy Gridlock, 1947–1996 213
The seeds of this book were planted in conversations among the three coeditors, whose offices are just down the hall from each other's. In those conversations, we began to evaluate the conventional view that the American parties of the last quarter of the twentieth century were feeble. Our conversations led us to another conclusion, that the state of the parties was more complex and multifaceted than we had initially thought, showing signs of strength alongside signs of weakness.
We understood that it would be no easy task to explain the road the parties have taken over the past twenty-five years or so to reach their current state. To that end, we thought it would be useful to students of parties, and of American politics more generally, if we could gather some of the best research on the current state of the parties, analyses of patterns of change over the past quarter century, and projections concerning the future of the parties. To do so, we required the support of many individuals and institutions, and we were fortunate in securing that support.
In preparation of this manuscript, we held a conference at the Rose Hill Campus of Fordham University entitled “American Politics at the Millennium: Political Parties and the Future of American Democracy.” We brought together a number of the leading scholars on the American parties to participate, present their ideas, and interact with each other and the larger community of those interested in American politics and its parties. That conference was part of a continuing series run by the graduate program of the Department of Political Science at Fordham, the Fordham University Forum on American Politics. The forum has been in operation since 1997, bringing scholars and commentators on American politics to campus to discuss important topics in their field. The forum, like our conference, is generously supported by the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Fordham University as well as by the graduate program of the Department of Political Science.
Besides those who were asked to present papers, a large number of interested people and scholars from around the region attended our parties conference. We want to thank all those who attended and, by their attendance and participation, added to the conversation and provided stimulation for all involved. Special thanks go to Robert Erikson and Robert Shapiro, both of Columbia University, who graciously served as session chairs.
[Page viii]Our conference was the starting point for production of this book. A number of the chapters began as papers presented at that conference, although they have been substantially revised. These chapters include the contributions of James E. Campbell, Matthew Crenson and Benjamin Ginsberg, William Crotty, Roger H. Davidson, David G. Lawrence, Theodore J. Lowi, L. Sandy Maisel, and Gerald M. Pomper. Not every paper presented, however, found its way into this volume, and we have added a number of other papers not presented at the conference (those by Sarah A. Binder, Richard Fleisher and Jon R. Bond, and Victoria A. Farrar-Myers and Diana Dwyre).
Many other debts were accumulated in preparing this manuscript. The staff at CQ Press was especially important in shaping the final look of this book and seeing it through to completion. Brenda Carter, director of college publishing at CQ Press, offered many useful suggestions about the book that improved it greatly; Gwenda Larsen, associate editor at CQ Press, ably steered us through the publication and production processes; and Amy Marks diligently copyedited the manuscript, a daunting task considering the number of authors and their varying writing styles.
Special thanks go to Patrick Bernardo, Erin Larocco, Alex Ott, and Flagg Taylor, all graduate students at Fordham University, who in one capacity or another ensured that our parties conference ran smoothly and that our manuscript got to CQ Press in one piece. Andria Bordenga, Maureen Hanratty, and Dawn Silvestri provided us with outstanding secretarial and administrative support. Without the help of all of these people, this project would not have been completed.
We also incurred special debts to Deans Michael Gillan, Robert Grimes, S.J., and Jeffrey Von Arx, S.J., of Fordham University, for their support of this project, financial and otherwise, including the conference, preparation of this manuscript, and release time for Cohen to see to the book's timely completion.
Although Fordham University has been especially generous to us, allowing us to fulfill our ambitious vision, our deepest thanks go to Robert Himmelberg, who served as dean of the Graduate School of Fordham University while this project was undertaken. Under Bob's stewardship we secured funding for both the conference and much of this book. Bob kept us in check but also provided large doses of encouragement. For all that he has done, we dedicate this book to him.
Sarah A. Binder is assistant professor of political science at George Washington University and fellow in governmental studies at the Brookings Institution. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1995. She is author of Minority Rights, Majority Rule (1997) and coauthor, with Steven S. Smith, of Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate (1997). Her work on congressional development, legislative gridlock, and Senate politics has also appeared in the American Political Science Review, Journal of Politics, and Legislative Studies Quarterly.
Jon R. Bond is professor of political science at Texas A&M University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He has published articles on presidential-congressional relations, congressional elections, and public policy in the American Political Science Review, Journal of Politics, American Journal of Political Science, and other journals. He has published two books with Richard Fleisher, The President in the Legislative Arena and Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Formerly an American Political Science Association congressional fellow, Bond has served as coeditor of the Journal of Politics. He is a member of the executive council of the Southern Political Science Association and the publications committee of the American Political Science Association.
James E. Campbell is professor of political science at the University at Buffalo, SUNY. He was an American Political Science Association congressional fellow and has served as political science program director at the National Science Foundation. He is author of Cheap Seats: The Democratic Party's Advantage in U.S. House Elections (1996), The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections (1993 and 1997), and The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote (2000). He coedited Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections (2000). Campbell's research has also appeared in numerous scholarly journals.
Jeffrey E. Cohen is professor of political science at Fordham University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1979. His major areas of interest are American politics and public policy, especially as they relate to [Page x]the presidency. His book Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy Making (1997) was awarded the 1998 Richard E. Neustadt Award of the Presidency Research Section of the American Political Science Association.
Matthew Crenson is professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1969. His teaching and research interests are urban politics and American political development. His most recent book is Building the Invisible Orphanage: A Prehistory of the American Welfare System (1998).
William Crotty is Thomas P. O'Neill Chair in Public Life and director of the Center for Comparative Government at Northeastern University. He is author of a number of books and articles on political parties, campaigns, and elections and has received the Lifetime Achievement Award of the Political Organizations and Parties Section of the American Political Science Association.
Roger H. Davidson, emeritus professor of government and politics at the University of Maryland, is now visiting professor of political science at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Among his books is Congress and Its Members, 7th ed. (2000), with Walter J. Oleszek. He has served on House and Senate committee staffs, consulted for the White House, and lectured or led workshops in the United States, Europe, Africa, Asia, and South America.
Diana Dwyre is associate professor of political science at California State University, Chico. She received her Ph.D. from the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University in 1994. Her research on campaign finance, political parties, and interest groups has been published in several journals and in books such as Financing the 1996 Elections and The State of the Parties. Her book Legislative Labyrinth: Congress and Campaign Finance Reform (2001), written with Victoria A. Farrar-Myers, was published by CQ Press. Dwyre was the 1998 American Political Science Association Steiger Congressional Fellow.
Victoria A. Farrar-Myers is assistant professor of political science at the University of Texas, Arlington. She received her Ph.D. from the University at Albany, SUNY. Her research on Congress, the presidency, and campaign finance has been published in Congress and the Presidency and American Review of Politics[Page xi]and will appear in the forthcoming book The Presidency and the Law. Farrar-Myers is coauthor with Diana Dwyre of Legislative Labyrinth: Congress and Campaign Finance Reform (2001). She has received such honors as the American Political Science Association Congressional Fellowship and a research grant from the Dirksen Congressional Center.
Richard Fleisher is professor and chair of the political science department at Fordham University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His articles on presidential-congressional relations, congressional elections, constituency influence in roll-call voting, and electoral realignments have appeared in the American Political Science Review, Journal of Politics, American Journal of Political Science, Political Research Quarterly, Legislative Studies Quarterly, American Politics Quarterly, and Political Science Quarterly. He is coeditor of Polarized Politics, published by CQ Press, and coauthor of The President in the Legislative Arena. Fleisher is continuing his research on party polarization in American politics.
Benjamin Ginsberg is David Bernstein Professor of Political Science and director of the Center for the Study of American Government at Johns Hopkins University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1973. Ginsberg was professor of government at Cornell University before joining the Hopkins faculty in 1992. He is author or coauthor of a number of books, including Politics by Other Means; American Government: Freedom and Power; The Captive Public; The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State; We the People; The Consequences of Consent; and the forthcoming From Citizen to Customer: How America Downsized Citizenship and Privatized Its Public. The Hopkins class of 2000 awarded Ginsberg the George E. Owen prize for outstanding teaching and devotion to undergraduates.
Paul Kantor is professor of political science at Fordham University and president of the Urban Politics Section of the American Political Science Association. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. Among his most recent works are The Dependent City Revisited (1995) and The Politics of Urban America: A Reader (1998), coedited with Dennis R. Judd.
David G. Lawrence is professor of political science at Fordham University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1975. His major area of [Page xii]interest is political behavior, with specific attention to voting, party systems, public opinion, and empirical democratic theory. He is author of The Collapse of the Democratic Presidential Majority (1996).
Theodore J. Lowi has been John L. Senior Professor of American Institutions at Cornell University since 1972. He received his Ph.D. from Yale University in 1961. Lowi has contributed to the study of politics in a variety of areas, including political theory, public policy analysis, and American political institutions. Author of The End of Liberalism (1969, 1979) and The End of the Republican Era (1995), Lowi is coauthor of one of the leading American government texts, American Government—Freedom and Power, 6th ed. (2000). The 1991 president of the American Political Science Association, he served as first vice president of the International Political Science Association from 1994 to 1997 and president from 1997 to 2000.
L. Sandy Maisel is William R. Kenan Jr. Professor of Government at Colby College, where he has taught for three decades. A graduate of Harvard College, he received his Ph.D. from Columbia University in 1971. He is author of Parties and Elections in America: The Electoral Process (2001), editor of The Parties Respond (2001), and general editor of Jews in American Politics (2001). His current research involves an examination of why potential candidates do and do not decide to run for the House.
Gerald M. Pomper is Board of Governors Professor of Political Science at the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University. Author or editor of sixteen books, his publications include Passions and Interests, Elections in America, and Voters' Choice. His next book will be The Election of 2000, the seventh volume in a twenty-four-year series on U.S. national elections. Educated at Columbia and Princeton Universities, Pomper also has been a Fulbright scholar and visiting professor at the University of Oxford, Tel-Aviv University, and Australian National University.
References[Page 265]1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.”American Political Science Review76 (June): 502–521. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963728, and .1999. Change and Continuity in the 1996 and 1998 Elections. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press., , and .1995. Why Parties? The Origins and Transformations of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226012773.001.00011999. “A High-Tech Industry, Long Shy of Politics, Is Now Belle of Ball.”New York Times, December 26, A1..American National Election Studies, 1948–1997. 1998. CD-ROM.American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System.”American Political Science Review44 (Supplement).1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso..1993. The Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York: Macmillan., , and .1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press., and .1999. “Political Briefing.”New York Times, October 24, 28.1999. “Clinton and Congress Agree on Budget Goals.”Washington Post, July 13, A1., and .1997. Taking the Initiative: Leadership Agendas in Congress and the “Contract with America.”Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.1959. The Condition of Our National Political Parties. New York: Fund for the Republic.1996. “A Motor Voter Apparently Didn't Drive Up Turnout.”Washington Post, November 6, B7..2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.”American Journal of Political Science44 (January): 35–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26692911997. Issue Advocacy Advertising During the 1996 Campaign. Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center., , , and .1984. “The Dealignment Era in America.” In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Russell J.Dalton, Scott C.Flanagan, and Paul AllenBeck. Princeton: Princeton University Press.[Page 266]1997. Party Politics in America,8th ed.New York: Addison-Wesley.1978. “In Search of a New Public Philosophy.” In The New American Political System, ed. AnthonyKing. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press., , , , and .1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., , and .1993. “Citizen Groups and the Changing Nature of Interest Group Politics in America.”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science528 (July): 30–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027162935280010031998a. “Party Organizations, 1946–1996.” In Partisan Approaches to Postwar American Politics, ed. ByronShafer. New York: Chatham House.1998b. “State Party Organizations: Coping and Adapting to Candidate-Centered Politics and Nationalization.” In The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns,3d ed.Ed. L. SandyMaisel. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1999. “Spitting on the Umpire: Political Parties, the Federal Election Campaign Act, and the 1996 Campaigns.” In Financing the 1996 Elections, ed. John C.Green. Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe., and .1996. “The Disappearing Political Center.”The Brookings Review14 (fall): 36–39.1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96.”American Political Science Review93 (September): 519–533. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25855721997. “A Quantitative Study of the Impact of Service Learning Programs.” In Service-Learning: Applications from the Research, ed. Alan S.Waterman. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum., , and .2000. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press., and .1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.1991. “After the Big Bang House Battles Focused on Committee Issues.”Public Affairs Report32 (March): 8..1998. Revolving Gridlock. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press., and .1999. “Cook Lectured by GOP Leaders.”Roll Call, September 23, 1, 29..1971. The Party's Over. New York: Harper & Row..1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion and Public SupportStanford: Stanford University Press.1998. The Greatest Generation. New York: Random House.. [Page 267]1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press..1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.1975. “Insulation and Responsiveness in Congressional Elections.”Political Science Quarterly90 (fall): 411–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21482941909. The American Commonwealth (Vol. 2). New York: Macmillan..1927. Uncle Joe Cannon: The Story of a Pioneer American. New York: Holt..1972. “Change in the American Electorate.” In The Human Meaning of Social Change, ed. AngusCampbell and Philip E.Converse. New York: Russell Sage Foundation..1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley., , , and .1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, and Company., , and .1997. The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections,2d ed.Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.2000a. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.2000b. “The Science of Forecasting Presidential Elections.” In Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections, ed. James E.Campbell and James C.Garand. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.2000. “A Pox on Both Your Parties.” In The Enduring Debate, ed. DavidCanon et al.New York: Norton..1978. “Separation of Powers and the Madisonian Model.”American Political Science Review72 (March): 151–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/19536051997. “Issue Evolution in Postwar American Politics: Old Certainties and Fresh Tensions.” In Present Discontents: American Politics in the Very Late Twentieth Century, ed. Byron E.Shafer. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House., and .1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press., and .1986. “Models of Administrative Action.”Virginia Law Review72 (March): 363–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1073062.1979. Presidential Selection: Theory and Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.1982. Reforming the Reforms. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.1978. “Party, Competition, and Mass Participation, 1824–1852.” In The History of American Electoral Behavior, ed. JoelSilbey, Allan G.Bogue, and William H.Flanigan. Princeton: Princeton University Press., and . [Page 268]1922. What I Saw in America. New York: Dodd, Mead.1998. “The Decline of Parties in the Minds of Citizens.”Annual Review of Political Science1: 357–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.357, and .1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Pantheon., and .1990. Partisan Realignment,, , and .2d ed.Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.2000. Politics and Economic Policy in the United States,2d ed.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.1996. “Why I Am Leaving.”Washington Post, January 21, C7.1996. Party Decline in America: Policy, Politics, and the Fiscal State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.1999. “Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness.”American Political Science Review93 (December): 821–836. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25861151998. From New Federalism to Devolution: Twenty-Five Years of Intergovernmental Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press..1994. Congress' Permanent Minority? Republicans in the U.S. House. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield., and .1979. “Plus ca Change … The New CPS Election Study Panel.”American Political Science Review73 (March): 32–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1954729, and .1997. “Partisanship, Bipartisanship, and Crosspartisanship in Congress Since the New Deal.” In Congress Reconsidered,, and .6th ed.Ed. Lawrence C.Dodd and Bruce I.Oppenheimer. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.1997. “Party Soft Money.” In Campaign Finance Reform: A Sourcebook, ed. Anthony J.Corrado, Thomas E.Mann, Daniel R.Ortiz, TrevorPotter, and Frank J.Sorauf. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press..Corrado, Anthony J., Thomas E.Mann, Daniel R.Ortiz, TrevorPotter, and Frank J.Sorauf, eds. 1997. Campaign Finance Reform: A Sourcebook. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.1996. “Change and the American Electorate.” In Broken Contract: Changing Relationships Between Americans & Their Government, ed. Stephen C.Craig. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1974. “Organizational Factors in Citizen Participation.”Journal of Politics36 (May): 356–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21294741987. “American Bureaucracy Since World War II.” In The New American State: Bureaucracies and Policies Since World War II, ed. LouisGalambos. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press., and .1978. Decision for the Democrats. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.. [Page 269]1980. “The Philosophies of Party Reform.” In Party Renewal in America, ed. Gerald M.Pomper. New York: Praeger..1983. Party Reform. New York: Longman..1984. American Political Parties in Decline. Boston: Little, Brown..1985. Presidential Primaries and Nominations. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press., and .1999. “Political Activists over Time: Working Elites in the Party System.” In Comparative Political Parties and Party Elites, ed. BirolYesilada. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press., , and .1999. “More Young People Turn Away from Politics and Concentrate Instead on Community Service.”Wall Street Journal, July 16, A28..1988. “Some Reflections About Divided Government.”Presidential Studies Quarterly17 (summer): 485–492..1996. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies,2d ed.Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.1992. “The Voting Rights Act: A Brief History.” In Controversies in Minority Voting—The Voting Rights Act in Perspective, ed. BernardGroffman and ChandlerDavidson. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press..1996. “The Presidency and Congressional Time.” In Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations, ed. James A.Thurber. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.1954 [originally published 1835]. Democracy in America, ed. PhillipsBradley. 2 vols. New York: Vintage Books..1960. Democracy in America, trans. . 2 vols. New York: Vintage Books..1993. “Motor Voter Agreement Is Reached.”Washington Post, April 28, A6..1999. “Uncovered Washington.”The New York Review of Books, June 24, 72–80..1991. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Simon & Shuster.1996. They Only Look Dead: Why Progressives Will Dominate the Next Political Era. New York: Touchstone.1995. “The New American Politics: Reflections on the Early 1990s.” In The New American Politics: Reflections on Political Change and the Clinton Administration, ed. Bryan D.Jones. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper..“Eightieth Congress: To Date.”1948. New York Times, June 20, 8 E.1983. Politics and Money: The New Road to Corruption. New York: Macmillan..1999. The Corruption of American Politics: What Went Wrong and Why. New York: Birch Lane.. [Page 270]1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, trans. and . New York: Wiley..1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State,.2d ed.Trans. and . New York: Wiley.1994. “Party Strategy and Political Reality: The Distribution of Congressional Campaign Committee Resources.” In The State of the Parties, ed. Daniel M.Shea and John C.Green. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield..1996. “Spinning Straw Into Gold: Soft Money and U.S. House Elections.”Legislative Studies Quarterly21 (August): 409–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440251.1999. “Who Controls the Dialogue of Democracy? Campaign Communications in 1998.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Seattle., and .2001. Legislative Labyrinth: Congress and Campaign Finance Reform. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press., and .1990. Presidential Approval: A Sourcebook. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press., with .1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583391.1980. “What Happened to the British Party Model?”American Political Science Review74 (March): 9–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1955643.1985. Rainbow's End: Irish-Americans and the Dilemmas of Urban Machine Politics, 1840–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.1998. “The Timeline of Political Campaigns.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association., and .1980. American Political Parties. New York: New Viewpoints.1978. The Parties: Republicans and Democrats in This Century. New York: St. Martin's..1998. “Campaign Finance Reform in the 105th Congress: A Behind-the-Scenes Look at Bipartisan Maneuvering.”American Review of Politics19 (winter): 345–360., and .Federal Election Commission. 1996. Campaign Guide for Political Party Committees. August.Federal Election Commission. 1997. “FEC Reports Major Increase in Party Activity for 1995–96.” News Release, March 9.Federal Election Commission. 1999. “Political Party Fundraising Continues to Climb.” News Release, January 26.Federal Election Commission. 2000. “FEC Announces 2000 Presidential Spending Limits.” News Release, March 1.1999. “Campaign Finance Laws and Practices.” MA thesis, Department of Political Science, Johns Hopkins University.. [Page 271]1993. “Reexamining the ‘Minimal Effects' Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns.”Journal of Politics55 (February): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21322251981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.1996. Divided Government,.2d ed.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.1993. “Explaining the Change in Roll-Call Voting Behavior of Southern Democrats.”Journal of Politics55 (May): 327–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2132268.1996. “The President in a More Partisan Legislative Arena.”Political Research Quarterly49 (December): 729–748., and .1896. The Speaker of the House of Representatives. New York: Longmans, Green.1991. The Emergence of the Modern European World: From the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.1990. “The Electoral Relevance of Local Party Organization.”American Political Science Review84 (March): 225–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963639, , and .1999. “Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation.”Journal of Politics61 (August): 700–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26478241999. Uneasy Alliances—Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press..1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?”British Journal of Political Science23 (October): 409–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006682, and .1999. “R.I.P. to a Conservative Force.”CQ Weekly, January 9, 82–83..1993. Politics at the Periphery—Third Parties in Two-Party America. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press..1990. Politics by Other Means. New York: Basic Books., and .1999. Politics by Other Means,, and .2d ed.New York: Norton.1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.1988. One Billion Dollars of Influence: The Direct Marketing of Politics. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.1994. “Late-Deciding Voters in Presidential Elections.”Political Behavior16 (March): 55–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01541642, and .1993. From Red Tape to Results, Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less: Report of the National Performance Review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service..1987. “Why ‘Defunding the Left’ Failed.”The Public Interest89 (fall): 93–99.[Page 272]Grofman, Bernard, and ChandlerDavidson, eds. 1992. Controversies in Minority Voting—The Voting Rights Act in Perspective. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.1996. “The So-Long Senators.”Washington Post, January 26, F1..1999. “Gephardt's Tireless Quest: Put Democrats Atop House.”Washington Post, July 12, A1..“Voting Rights and Democratic Theory: Where Do We Go From Here?” In Controversies in Minority Voting—The Voting Rights Act in Perspective, ed. BernardGroffman and ChandlerDavidson. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press..1974. Presidential Power and Accountability: Toward a New Constitution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press..1955. The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace..1988. Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1998a. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington,2d ed.Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.1998b. “National Party Organizations at the Century's End.” In The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns,3d ed.Ed. L. SandyMaisel. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.2000. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington,3d ed.Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.1998. “Party Issue Advocacy in Congressional Election Campaigns.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties,, and .3d ed.Ed. John C.Green and Daniel M.Shea. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174466, and .1995. “Does the Creation of Majority Black Districts Aid Republicans? An Analysis of the 1992 Congressional Elections in Eight Southern States.”Journal of Politics57 (May) : 384–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/29603121975. “Military Organization and State Organization.” In The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze, ed. FelixGilbert. New York: Oxford University Press..1996. Do Campaigns Matter?Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243825“The Hollow Branch.”1994. Washington Post, August 26, A24.1999. “Clinton's Biggest Prize Was a Frustrated GOP.”CQ Weekly, January 9, 75–77, 86–91..1981. American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap.[Page 273]“Hypocrisy on Campaign Funds” [editorial]. 1998. Washington Post, April 1, A18.1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press..1992. “The Party-as-Organization: Party Elites and Party Reforms in Presidential Nominations and Conventions.” In Challenges to Party Government, ed. John KennethWhite and Jerome M.Mileur. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press..1982. “Herbert McClosky and Friends Revisited.”American Politics Quarterly10 (April): 158–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004478082010002002, , and .1978. “Representation and Political Values.”American Politics Quarterly6 (April): 187–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X7800600205, , and .2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, ed. Jon R.Bond and RichardFleisher. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.“Liberal-Conservative Thinking in the American Electorate.”Research in Micropolitics, in press..1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.1971. The Winning of the Midwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press..2001. Political Parties and Elections in the American States,, and .4th ed.Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.1988. Political Parties and Elections in the American States,, and .3d ed.Chicago: Dorsey.1994. Congressional Dynamics: Structure, Coordination, and Choice in the First American Congress, 1774–1789. Stanford: Stanford University Press., and .1991. “Organized Labor in an Era of Blue-Collar Decline.” In Interest Group Politics,3d ed.Ed. Allan J.Cigler and Burdett A.Loomis. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.1968. “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.”Journal of Politics30 (August): 617–646. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21287982001. “Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock.”Political Research Quarterly54 (March): in press.1982. “Neoconservatism in Contemporary Political Science.”Journal of Politics44 (November): 955–982. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2130668.1994. “Electoral Research in the Federal Republic of Germany.”European Journal of Political Research25 (April): 343–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1994.tb00425.x, and .1999. “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship Between Negativity and Participation.”American Political Science Review93 (December): 877–890. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2586118, and . [Page 274]1985. The Party Goes On. New York: Basic Books., and1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press., , , , , and .1974. “The Simple Act of Voting.”American Political Science Review68 (June): 572–591. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1959506, and .1993. “Divided We Govern? A Reassessment.”Polity25 (spring): 475–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/32349751998. Remote and Controlled: Media Politics in a Cynical Age,2d ed.Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1977. “Toward Understanding the Nineteenth Century Congressional Career Patterns: Ambition, Competition, and Rotation.”American Journal of Political Science21 (November): 669–693. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2110731.1980. “Achieving Less Influence with More Democracy: The Permanent Influence of the War on Poverty.”Social Science Quarterly61 (March): 208–220., and .1942. Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.1964. Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups,5th ed.New York: Crowell.1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown..1971. “‘Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System’: Political Science, Policy Science, or Pseudo-Science?”American Political Science Review65 (December): 965–990. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/19534931976. The New Presidential Elite: Men and Women in National Politics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and the Twentieth Century Fund..1982. Who Voted? The Dynamics of Electoral Turnout, 1870–1980. New York: Praeger..1994. Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press., , and .1998. Pursuing Majorities: Congressional Campaign Committees in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press..1995. “Who's Running the House? GOP Freshmen or Newt?”Roll Call, December 18, 5..1998. Solving the Puzzle of Interest Group Litigation. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.1974. The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1890–1910. New Haven: Yale University Press.1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.. [Page 275]1999. Expecting More Say: The American Public on Its Role in Government Decisionmaking. Washington, D.C.: Center on Policy Attitudes..1994. “The Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory.”Ethics104 (January): 352–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/293605, and .1982. Where Have All the Voters Gone? The Fracturing of America's Political Parties,2d ed.New York: Norton.1987. “Party Reform and the Public Interest.”Political Science Quarterly102 (autumn): 355–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2151398Ladd, Everett C., ed. 1999. America at the Polls 1998. Storrs, Conn.: Roper Center, University of Connecticut.1985. “On Mandates, Realignments, and the 1984 Presidential Election.”Political Science Quarterly100 (spring): 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21508581978. Transformations of the American Party System,, with .2d ed.New York: Norton.1995. The Revolt of the Elites. New York: Norton..1999. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-analytic Assessment.”American Political Science Review93 (December): 851–876. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2586117, , , and .1996. The Collapse of the Democratic Presidential Majority: Realignment, Dealignment, and Electoral Change from Franklin Roosevelt to Bill Clinton. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1999. “On the Resurgence of Party Identification in the 1990s.” Paper presented at the Fordham University Forum on American Politics, Political Parties and the Future of American Politics: An Assessment at the Millennium, November 5.1999. “Ideological Realignment in Contemporary American Politics.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association., and .1944. The People's Choice. New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce., , and .1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: Norton.1964. “American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies and Political Theory.”World Politics16 (July): 689–690. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2009452.1969. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: Norton..1985. “Presidential Power: Restoring the Balance.”Political Science Quarterly100 (summer): 185–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21506521998. A Republic of Parties?Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield., and . [Page 276]1947. “The Leipsic Debate (July, 1559).” In Pageant of Europe, Sources and Selections from Renaissance to the Present Day, ed. Raymond P.Stearn. New York: Harcourt Brace..1996. The Irony of Reform. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press..1941 [originally published 1787]. The Federalist #10. New York: Modern Library..Maisel, L. Sandy, ed. 1998. The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Elections,3d ed.Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1999. Parties and Elections in America: The Electoral Process,.3d ed.Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.2000. “Election Laws and Party Rules: Contributions to a Stronger Party Role?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., and .1997. “Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U.S. House Elections: An Exploratory Study.”Legislative Studies Quarterly22 (February): 79–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440292, and .1996. The Divided Democrats. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1998. “Mass Partisanship, 1946–1996.” In Partisan Approaches to Postwar American Politics, ed. Byron E.Shafer. New York: Chatham House.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigating, 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.1960. “Issue Conflict and Consensus Among Party Leaders and Followers.”American Political Science Review54 (June): 406–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1978302, , and .1986. The Decline of Popular Politics: The American North, 1865–1928. New York: Oxford University Press..1992. “Tocqueville and Responsible Parties.” In Challenges to Party Government, ed. John KennethWhite and Jerome M.Mileur. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press..1986. Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship. New York: Free Press..1993. Continental America, 1800–1867, Vol. 2 of The Shaping of America: A Geographic Perspective on 500 Years of History. New Haven: Yale University Press.1983. Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press..1999. “Virtual Politics: Candidates' Consultants Create the Customized Campaign.”New Republic, July 5, 22–27.. [Page 277]1992. “Prospects for Party Government.” In Challenges to Party Government, ed. John KennethWhite and Jerome M.Mileur. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press.1992. “Programmatic Liberalism and Party Politics.” In Challenges to Party Government, ed. John KennethWhite and Jerome M.Mileur. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press..1988. Without Consent: Mass-Elite Linkages in Presidential Politics. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation., and .1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press., and .1998. “Some House Democrats Balancing Doubts and Party Loyalty in Fund-Raising Debate.”New York Times, June 8, A14..Mitchell, Stewart, ed. 1931. Winthrop Papers, 5 vols. Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society.1998. The Governor as Party Leader. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.1964. The Purpose of American Politics. New York: Vintage Books..1988. Campaigns, Congress, and Courts: The Making of Federal Campaign Financing Laws. New York: Praeger.1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and American Democracy. New York: Harper..1996. “Decline of Electoral Turnout: the Case of Norway.”European Journal of Political Research29 (March): 235–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00650.x, and .1999. “Undemocratic Vistas.”The New York Review of Books, August 12, 9–12..1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., , and .1979. The Changing American Voter, enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press., , and .1994. “The French Fiscal Crisis of 1788.” In Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450–1789, ed. Phillip T.Hoffman and KathrynNorberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press..Nye, Joseph S., Philip D.Zelikow, and David C.King, eds. 1997. Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1997. “Taking the Conservative State Seriously: Statebuilding and Restrictive Labor Practices in Postwar America.”Journal of Labor Studies21 (winter): 33–63..2000. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1999–2000. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press., , and . [Page 278]1902. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. New York: Macmillan..1999. “Partisan Voting on the Rise.”CQ Weekly, January 9, 79–83, 92–95.1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001, and .1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..1952. “Responsiveness, Responsibility, and Majority Rule.”American Political Science Review46 (September): 790–807. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1952285.“Perhaps the Worst Congress.”1994. Washington Post, October 7, A24.“The Plot to Bury Reform” [editorial]. 1998. New York Times, March 30, A16.1968. “The Institutionalization of the House of Representatives.”American Political Science Review62 (March): 144–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/19533311983. Consequences of Party Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.1996. Presidential Elections: Strategies of American Electoral Politics,, and .9th ed.New York: Scribner's.1971. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System? What, Again?”Journal of Politics33 (November): 916–940. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2128416Pomper, Gerald M., ed. 1980. Party Renewal in America. New York: Praeger.1998. “The Place of American Political Parties.” In A Republic of Parties? Debating the Two-Party System, ed. TheodoreLowi and JosephRomance. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.1999. “Parliamentary Government in the United States?” In The State of the Parties,3d ed.Ed. John C.Green and Daniel M.Shea. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press., and .1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.2000. “Inhofe Will Block All Clinton Judicial Nominations.”Roll Call, January 10..1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.1995. “Bowling Alone.”Journal of Democracy6 (January): 66–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.00021996. “The Strange Disappearance of Civic America.”The American Prospect24 (winter): 34–45.1951. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Commentary.”American Political Science Review45 (June): 488–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1951475.1956. The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.. [Page 279]1975. Curing the Mischiefs of Faction. Berkeley: University of California Press..1992. Citizenship in the Western Tradition: Plato to Rousseau. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press..1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.”American Political Science Review76 (December): 753–766. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1962968.1930. Thomas B. Reed: Parliamentarian. New York: Dodd, Mead.1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226724058.001.0001.1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan., and .1984. Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton: Princeton University Press., , and .1996. Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure,, , and .2d ed.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Rossiter, Clinton, ed. 1961. “Federalist 56.” In The Federalist Papers, Hamilton, Madison and Jay. New York: New American Library—Mentor Books.1966. Politics and Power: The United States Senate, 1869–1901. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1988. The Party's Just Begun. Glencoe, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.1994. “The Paradox of Taxation: Fiscal Crises, Parliament, and the Liberty of England.” In Fiscal Crises, Liberty and Representative Government, 1450–1789, ed. Philip T.Hoffman and KathrynNorberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.1992. “A Notable Administration: English State Formation and the Rise of Capitalism.”American Journal of Sociology97 (March): 1382–1415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/229905.1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.1948. The Struggle for Party Government. College Park: University of Maryland Press.1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.1999. “The End of Mobilization: Contemporary Party, Interest Group and Campaign Strategies.” Paper presented at meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 15–17.2000. By Invitation Only: The Rise of Exclusive Politics in the United States. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.[Page 280]1986. The Cycles of American History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press..Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs. 1998. “Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns” (Vols. 1–6). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.1995. “Mr. In-Between.”National Journal, December 16, 3080–3084..1999. “New Parties/New Politics?”Party Politics5 (June): 383–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068899005003007.1983. Quiet Revolution: The Struggle for the Democratic Party and the Shaping of Party Reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Shafer, Byron E., ed. 1991. The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Eras. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.1996. “Has President Clinton Fulfilled His Campaign Promises?” Paper presented at American Political Science Association..1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Political Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press..1998. “Politicians Embrace Status Quo as Nonvoter Numbers Grow.”Los Angeles Times, May 4, A5..1991. The American Political Nation, 1838–1893. Stanford: Stanford University Press.1998. “From ‘Essential to the Existence of Our Institutions' to ‘Rapacious Enemies of Honest and Responsible Government’: The Rise and Fall of American Political Parties, 1790–2000.” In The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns,3d ed.Ed. L. SandyMaisel. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmakers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press..1999. “Associations Without Members.”The American Prospect45 (July/August): 66–72..1998. “Political Parties and the New World Order of Campaign Finance.” In The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns,3d ed.Ed. L. SandyMaisel. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.2000. Vital Statistics on American Politics 1999–2000. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press., and .1992. “Legality in Administration in Britain and the United States: Toward an Institutional Explanation.”Comparative Political Studies25 (July): 210–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414092025002003.1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.. [Page 281]1999. “Public Policy Mood, 1952–1996: Annual Data File” (accessed April 21, 1999)..1995. “Dynamic Representation.”American Political Science Review89 (September): 543–565. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2082973, , and .1996. “The Green Wave.”National Journal, November 9, 2411.1994. “Party Polarization: The Reagan Revolution and Beyond.” In The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns,, , and .2d ed.Ed. L. SandyMaisel. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1999. “The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential House Candidates' Nomination and General Election Chances.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta., and .1998. “Candidate Emergence in U. S. House Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston., , and .1998. “Partisan Officeholders, 1946–1996.” In Partisan Approaches to Postwar American Politics, ed. Byron E.Shafer. New York: Chatham House.“Stretch-Out in the House” [editorial]. 1998. Washington Post, June 21, C6.1999. “R.I. Senator Dead at 77.”Boston Herald, October 26, 2..1995. “History of Congress: The Age of the Machine.” In Encyclopedia of the United States Congress (Vol. 2), ed. Donald C.Bacon, Roger H.Davidson, and MortonKeller. New York: Simon & Schuster.1994. The Press Gang: Newspapers and Politics, 1863–1878. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.1988–1989. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.”Political Science Quarterly103 (winter 1988–winter 1989): 613–635.Sundquist, James L., ed. 1995. Back to Gridlock? Governance in the Clinton Years. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.1998. “Explaining Government Productivity.”American Politics Quarterly26 (October): 439–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9802600403Thucydides. 1960. The History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. . New York: Oxford University Press.1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell..1996. The Angry American: How Voter Rage is Changing the Nation. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.1986. “The Rise and Fall of American Trade Unions: The Labor Movement from FDR to RR.” In Unions in Transition: Entering the Second Century, ed. Seymour MartinLipset. San Francisco: ICS Press..1951. “Responsible Parties: A Dissent from the Floor.”American Political Science Review45 (March): 143–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1950888. [Page 282]U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1998. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press., , and .1998. “An Empirical Assessment of Self-Esteem Enhancement in a High School Challenge Service-Learning Program.”Education119 (fall): 99–106., , and .1988. The Breakdown of Democratic Party Organization, 1940–1980. New York: Oxford University Press..1984. The Decline of American Political Parties. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1990. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1988. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections in the 1980s. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1994. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1992. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1996. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1994. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1998. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1996. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1946 [originally published 1919]. “Politics as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber, ed. H. H.Gerth and C. WrightMills. New York: Oxford University Press..1993. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952–1992. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.1997. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952–1996,2d ed.Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.White, John K., and Jerome M.Mileur, eds. 1992. Challenges to Party Government. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.1994. “Reinventing Public Administration.”PS27 (December): 667–673.1908. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press..1956. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. New York: Meridian Books..1994. “The Meaning of ‘Party’ in Congressional Roll Call Voting.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.1966. The Washington Community: 1800–1828. New York: Columbia University Press.