Widening the Family Circle: New Research on Family Communication
Publication Year: 2014
Widening the Family Circle: New Research on Family Communication, Second Edition continues to address historically under-studied family relationships, such as those involving grandparents, in-laws, cousins, stepfamilies, and adoptive parents. In this engaging text, editors Kory Floyd and Mark T. Morman bring together a diverse collection of empirical studies, theoretic essays, and critical reviews of literature on communication to constitute a stronger, more complete understanding of communication within the family.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: Looking Back and Moving Forward: Toward an Understanding of Mother-Daughter and Mother-Son Relationships
- Chapter 2: Adult Sibling Relationships
- Chapter 3: Communication in Grandparent-Grandchild Relationships
- Chapter 4: The “Other” Women in Family Life: Recognizing the Significance of Aunt/Niece/Nephew Communication
- Chapter 5: Family Communication Among Uncles and Nephews
- Chapter 6: Relationships with Parents-in-Law
- Chapter 7: Siblings-in-Law, Unwidened
- Chapter 8: Fathering, Caregiving, and Masculinity: Stay-at-Home Fathers and Family Communication
- Chapter 9: Lesbian and Gay Families
- Chapter 10: Widening the Understanding of Post-Divorce Families
- Chapter 11: No Longer Understudied but Still Misunderstood: Expanding Communication Research on Stepfamily Relationships
- Chapter 12: Created Through Law and Language: Communicative Complexities of Adoptive Families
To our families, both immediate and extended. Thank you for teaching us about the power of family relationships.
Copyright © 2014 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
SAGE Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications Ltd.
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.
3 Church Street
#10-04 Samsung Hub
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Widening the family circle: new research on family communication / [edited by] Kory Floyd, Mark T. Morman. — Second edition.
ISBN 978-1-4522-5694-8 (alk. paper)
1. Communication in families. 2. Interpersonal communication. I. Floyd, Kory. II. Morman, Mark T.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
13 14 15 16 17 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Acquisitions Editor: Matthew Byrnie
Editorial Assistant: Stephanie Palermini
Production Editor: Olivia Weber-Stenis
Copy Editor: Dan Gordon
Typesetter: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Proofreader: Barbara Johnson
Indexer: Joan Shapiro
Cover Designer: Gail Buschman
Marketing Manager: Liz Thornton
Permissions Editor: Karen Ehrmann
When we were young scholars, we noticed something perplexing about the family communication field: Although the family is perhaps the most diverse, dynamic relational experience known to humankind, virtually everyone in the field studied only one of two relationships, marriage or parent/young child pairs. There could be little argument that those relationships warranted in-depth attention, but we believed they hardly constituted a full representation of what it means to communicate in a family.
After all, we reasoned, most families include one or more of many other relationships that we simply cannot understand by studying marriage or parenthood. Families branch out in other directions as well, such as to siblings, aunts and uncles, cousins, and nieces and nephews. They reach across generations, such as to grandparents and grandchildren. And the family tree comes in more than one species, including adoptive and stepfamily relationships. From the vantage point of nearly any theoretic perspective, one would expect unique communication tribulations and triumphs among these various iterations of the family relationship, yet these were barely being explored, let alone understood.
That observation led us to engage with scholars and scholars-in-training whose interests did lie in diverse family relationships. With their generous cooperation, we published the first edition of this volume in 2006, widening the circle of family communication research in the process.
We could not have foreseen it at the time, but the book's message evidently touched a nerve in the field. Since 2006, research on previously neglected family relationships has proliferated. At academic conferences now, we regularly hear papers about siblings, grandparents, aunts and uncles, and stepfamilies, whereas that was rarely the case less than a decade ago. In 2011, the Interpersonal Interest Group of the Western States Communication Association sponsored a panel reflecting on the volume “five years out” as a way to acknowledge the many new lines of research it had helped to spawn. Largely as a result of that panel, we realized that the [Page xii]research on family relationships hadn't simply been updated since the publication of our book—rather, it represented a new philosophy about studying the family, one in which the circle had officially been widened.
It was time, therefore, to follow suit with a new edition of this volume. We have streamlined the presentation a bit, removing commentary to make room for more empirical content. Some new family relationships have joined the mix, such as the discussions of uncles by Robert Milardo, stay-at-home dads by Caryn Medved, gay and lesbian families by Elizabeth Suter and Daniel Strasser, and mother/adult child relationships by Michelle Miller-Day, Carla Fisher, and Jonathan Stube. Those and the returning relational chapters represent state-of-the-discipline reviews that, taken altogether, comprise an unparalleled look at communication in the broad family system.
We are less young now than when we first noticed the state of the field many years ago. Time has made us more grateful for many things, including the love and support of our own families, without which this new edition wouldn't have come to be. We are also thankful for the expert guidance of our editor at Sage Publications, Matt Byrnie, who was enthusiastic about a second edition from the start and has shepherded this project with efficiency and grace. Gary Beck at Old Dominion University, Rhonda Buckley at Texas Woman's University-Denton, Aimee E. Miller-Ott at the University of Hartford, Kandi L. Walker at the University of Louisville, and Laura L. Winn at Florida Atlantic University all gave selflessly of their time and talents as reviewers of our revision proposal, and we are grateful for their feedback. Finally, we wish to thank all the colleagues and students who have joined us in our journey to widen the family circle over the past several years. Your company has made the trip well worthwhile.
We hope you will appreciate reading about the joys and complexities of the family as much as we have.
Introduction: On the Breadth of the Family Experience[Page xiii]
The family is one of nature's masterpieces.—1863–1952)(
To call the family an important human institution is to understate its value profoundly. Virtually no other relationship engages us socially, genetically, legally, financially, and intimately with the pervasiveness of the family. Families are with us from beginning to end; we are born into familial relationships and we often leave this life with family members at our side. Families protect us, provide for us, and give us an identity and a sense of belonging. They stimulate the full spectrum of our emotions, from immeasurable joys to our deepest sorrows, and they enjoy a level of permanence unparalleled by almost anything else in our lives. Indeed, one could easily argue that the family is situated at the focal point of nearly all relational encounters. It is, truly, a masterpiece of the human experience.
Among the family's many unique attributes is its breadth across the relational landscape. From the nuclear reproductive and parental relationships, the family branches off in nearly innumerable directions to encompass other forms of familial ties. Some relationships, such as those with grandparents or nieces and nephews, are vertical ties, meaning that they span two or more generations. Others, such as with siblings or cousins, are horizontal ties, meaning they represent generational contemporaries. Many family relationships are genetically bound, however distantly (e.g., aunts and uncles, great-grandparents, second cousins). Others are formed through legal means, such as adoption (e.g., adoptive siblings), marriage (e.g., parents-in-law), [Page xiv]remarriage (e.g., stepfamilies), and divorce (e.g., post-divorce relationships). Still others are formed and maintained purely through social interaction. Those are the so-called “fictive kin,” the family-like relationships that are neither genetically nor legally bound, including godparents, neighbors, and longtime friends who are considered “family.”
As suggested by the metaphor of the tree—often used to represent family relationships—families exist at once in both nuclear and greatly extended forms. Any given person is linked, in some form or another, to every person on every other limb, branch, and step of his or her own tree. Certainly, some of these relationships seem socially inconsequential, particularly if they involve relatives who are distant genetically, geographically, or both. There is relevance in those relationships, however, that often goes unacknowledged by family communication scholars. For instance, genetic relatives (both within and outside the nuclear family) are often the first to be called on for emotional or economic support during times of crisis (Burnstein, Crandall, & Kitayama, 1994). Greitemeyer, Rudolph, and Weiner (2003) even demonstrated that in life-or-death crises, people help family members who are responsible for their own plight more often than innocent acquaintances. Similarly, it is almost always genetic relatives to whom assets are allocated in wills, and in some cultures, nieces and nephews are preferred over children in the allocation of property (Smith, Kish, & Crawford, 1987). People are even likely to communicate regularly with non-nuclear family members through mechanisms such as e-mail (Braithwaite, McBride, & Schrodt, 2003).What We Know and Don't Know About Communication in Family Relationships
Despite their clear relevance, family relationships other than marriage and parent/young child relationships have gone largely unscrutinized in research by many scholars in the fields of family communication, family psychology, and personal relationships. A decade ago, family scholars Karen Fingerman and Elizabeth Hay (2002) published a content analysis of nearly a thousand research articles appearing in family and personal relationships journals from 1994 to 1999. Their analysis found that more than 4 in 10 articles (44.3%) focused on marriage and roughly a quarter (25.6%) focused on parents' relationships with young children. By comparison, most other family relationships received virtually no scholarly attention at all. Even siblings, a component of the nuclear family, were studied in only 4.1% of the research.
[Page xv]That marital and parental relationships should so frequently be the focus of academic research is entirely understandable, given their importance in the human social agenda. The marital bond is perhaps the principal and most socially significant of all human attachments. Married people live longer, happier, and healthier lives than never-married people (Pinquart, 2003), and the termination of marriage through divorce (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 1988) or bereavement (Irwin, Daniels, Smith, Bloom, & Weiner, 1987) brings pronounced declines in physical well-being. The parental relationship may be even more consequential for well-being, given the advanced state of dependency into which humans are born. Evolutionary psychology suggests that humans (and all sexually reproducing species) have evolved through the pressures of natural selection to give primacy to the health of their offspring, and that this creates ingrained motivations to love, protect, and provide for one's children more than for nearly anyone else in one's social circle (see, e.g., Workman & Reader, 2004). The importance of the parent-child bond is also reflected in the magnitude of grief that parents routinely experience at the premature loss of a child. Researchers have known for decades that the death of a child is among the most potent of all psychological stressors (Holmes & Rahe, 1967). Indeed, losing a child is associated with pronounced increases in parental post-traumatic stress disorder (Murphy, Johnson, Chung, & Beaton, 2003) and parental mortality (Li, Precht, Mortensen, & Olsen, 2003).
However important marital and parental relationships are to the human social agenda, though, they represent only a narrow slice of the family experience. As we noted above, familial relationships beyond marital and parental bonds have been relatively neglected by scholars in the family and personal relationships fields. One of the principal problems with this imbalance in academic attention is that it belies people's actual familial experiences. After content-analyzing the family and personal relationships journals to quantify the amount of focus on each relationship, Fingerman and Hay (2002) surveyed a sample consisting of relationship scholars, those with advanced degrees in other fields, and other adults. They asked participants to indicate which family relationships they considered applicable to themselves and then to rate their importance. Although spousal and parent/young child relationships were understandably rated highly on both counts, other relationships were also considered highly applicable, including cousins (95%), aunts and uncles (92%), nieces and nephews (85%), siblings-in-law (80%), siblings (75%), parents-in-law (63%), and grandparents (50%). Moreover, participants rated all of these relationships, with the exception of cousins, above the midpoint of the scale for importance.
Those findings merely quantify what we suspect many people would say on their own: Although spousal and parental relationships are extremely [Page xvi]important, they are but two of the myriad relationships that make up the experience of family. Indeed, many other relationships engage people in ways that spouses, parents, and children do not. Siblings, for instance, are usually our most longstanding life companions. Grandparents, aunts, and uncles can serve as important allies and confidants in ways that parents may not. Cousins may act as surrogate siblings and may be particularly influential in the lives of only children. Adoption opens the door to parenthood for those who cannot or choose not to reproduce. Still other relationships are notable because they can be tremendously supportive, yet are often the sources of pronounced stress, such as stepfamilies or parents-in-law. Indeed, the diversity of the familial experience is great, and a focus on marital and parental relationships—critical though they are—prevents us from appreciating the rich tapestry that is a family.Have We Widened the Family Circle?
In the years since the publication of Fingerman and Hay's (2002) review and the first edition of this volume, have researchers systematically explored a wider range of family relationships? Family scholars Glen Stamp and Carolyn Shue (2013) recently analyzed 261 journal articles on the topic of family communication published between 1990 and 2009. Among the characteristics Stamp and Shue documented within each article were the family relationships being examined. An informal comparison to Fingerman and Hay's results provides reason to believe that the family communication discipline is indeed widening its focus. In particular, Stamp and Shue's survey shows that more research has emerged in the past decade on divorced family relationships, parent/adult-child relationships (especially father/adult-child), grandparent-grandchild relationships, in-laws, siblings, and stepfamilies.
Importantly, Stamp and Shue included only national and regional communication journals (Communication Monographs, Communication Quarterly, Communication Studies, Human Communication Research, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Journal of Communication, Southern Communication Journal, and Western Journal of Communication) in their survey, therefore excluding other relevant communication journals (e.g., Journal of Family Communication) as well as extra-disciplinary journals that publish family research (Journal of Marriage and Family, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Journal of Family Psychology). These sources, and others, are represented in the chapters that follow, which reflect a coming together of the most up-to-date, contemporary research on communication in the broad family system. The focus of the research addressed in each chapter [Page xvii]is relational communication, broadly construed to include various patterns of meaning-making. Each chapter details one family relationship and offers either a critical review of existing literature, a presentation of original data pertaining to communication in that relationship, or both. Each chapter then ends with questions for discussion and reflection. The goal of each chapter is to illuminate why the focal relationship is consequential and to describe its important communicative attributes.
Our mission with this updated collection is twofold. An immediate objective is to offer a resource for students and scholars of family interaction to learn of the research done on relationships outside the nuclear reproductive and parental unions. Such a view certainly is not intended to replace a focus on marital and parent/young-child relationships but rather to augment it, allowing students and scholars a broader appreciation of existing knowledge about family communication. Our longer-term objective with this revised contributed volume is to continue to encourage the exploration of these and other family relationships. As the experience of family continues to evolve in our society, so must our efforts to understand it. We hope this collection will illuminate the dynamics of diverse family relationships and will provoke students and scholars toward their continued exploration.[Page xviii]
About the Editors[Page xix]
Kory Floyd is professor and associate director of the Hugh Downs School of Human Communication at Arizona State University. He holds a PhD from University of Arizona, an MA from University of Washington, and a BA from Western Washington University. His research focuses on the communication of affection in families and other close relationships and on the interaction of communication, physiology, and health. He has written or edited 12 books and more than 90 journal articles and book chapters. He is a past chair of the Family Communication Division of the National Communication Association, a previous editor of Journal of Family Communication, and the current editor of Communication Monographs.
Mark T. Morman is director of graduate studies and professor of communication at Baylor University. He holds both MA and PhD degrees from the University of Kansas and a BS from Southern Utah University. His research focuses on affectionate communication within families and close relationships and on persuasive messages relevant to men's health issues. He has published several articles in both regional and national communication journals, has served as chair of the Family Communication Division and the Interpersonal Communication Division of the National Communication Association, has served on the editorial boards of Journal of Family Communication and Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, and currently serves on the editorial board of Communication Monographs.[Page xx]
About the Contributors[Page xxi]
- Tamara D. Afifi is a professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Iowa. She received her PhD in 1999 from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
- Dawn O. Braithwaite is a Willa Cather professor and department chair of communication studies at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She received her PhD in 1988 from the University of Minnesota.
- Colleen Warner Colaner is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Missouri-Columbia. She received her PhD in 2011 from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
- Shardé Davis is a doctoral student in the Department of Communication at the University of California, Santa Barbara. She received her MA in 2012 from UC Santa Barbara.
- Laura L. Ellingson is a professor in the Department of Communication and the Women's & Gender Studies Program at Santa Clara University. She received her PhD in 2001 from the University of South Florida.
- Carla L. Fisher is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Center for Health & Risk Communication at George Mason University. She received her PhD in 2008 from The Pennsylvania State University.
- Kathleen M. Galvin is a professor in the Communication Studies Department at Northwestern University. She received her PhD in 1968 from Northwestern University.
- Mei-Chen Lin is an associate professor and coordinator of the graduate program in the School of Communication Studies at Kent State University. He received his PhD in 2003 from the University of Kansas.
- Caryn E. Medved is an associate professor at Baruch College with the City University of New York. She received her PhD in 1998 from the University of Kansas. [Page xxii]
- Anne Merrill is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication at the University of California Santa Barbara. She received her MA in 2011 from UC Santa Barbara.
- Alan C. Mikkelson is an associate professor and chair of the Department of Communication Studies at Whitworth University. He received his PhD in 2006 from Arizona State University.
- Robert M. Milardo is professor of Family Relations at the University of Maine. He received his doctorate in Human Development in 1981 from The Pennsylvania State University.
- Michelle Miller-Day is a professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Chapman University. She received her PhD in 1995 from Arizona State University.
- Mary Claire Morr Serewicz is an associate professor and director of graduate studies in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Denver. She received her PhD in 2002 from Arizona State University.
- Paul Schrodt is the Philip J. and Cheryl C. Burguières professor and graduate director in the Department of Communication Studies at Texas Christian University. He received his PhD in 2003 from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
- Jordan Eli Soliz is director of graduate studies and an associate professor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He received his PhD in 2004 from the University of Kansas.
- Patricia J. Sotirin is a professor of Communication in the Department of Humanities at Michigan Technological University. She received her PhD in 1994 from Purdue University.
- Daniel S. Strasser is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Rowan University. He received his PhD in 2012 from the University of Denver.
- Jonathan Stube is a PhD candidate in Counselor Education and Supervision at The Pennsylvania State University. He received his MEd in 2011 from The Pennsylvania State University.
- Elizabeth A. Suter is an associate professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Denver. She received her PhD in 2001 from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
- Christina G. Yoshimura is an associate professor in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Montana. She received her PhD in 2004 from Arizona State University.
References[Page 211]1968). Kinship in an urban setting. Chicago, IL: Markham.(1989). Attitudes toward mother-in-law and stepmother: A cross-cultural study. Psychological Reports, 65, 1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3f.1194, , & (Adoptive Families Circle. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.adoptivefamiliescircle.com2003). “Feeling caught” in stepfamilies: Managing boundary turbulence through appropriate communication privacy rules. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 729–755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407503206002(2008). Communication in stepfamilies: Stressors and resilience. In J.Pryor (Ed.), The international handbook of stepfamilies: Policy and practice in legal, research, and clinical environments (pp. 299–320). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.(2004). A risk and resiliency model of ambiguous loss in postdivorce stepfamilies. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 65–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0402_1, & (2003). “Feeling caught” as a mediator of adolescents' and young adults' avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and non-divorced households. Communication Monographs, 70, 142–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000133791, & (2012). Analyzing divorce from cultural and network approaches. Manuscript submitted for publication., , , , , & (2011). Parents' communication skills and adolescents' salivary α-amylase and cortisol response patterns. Communication Monographs, 78, 273–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.589460, , , , Aldeis, D. (2012). The influence of divorce and parents' communication skills on adolescents' and young adults' stress reactivity and recovery. Manuscript submitted for publication., , , , & (2006). Toward a theoretical model of communal coping in postdivorced families and other naturally occurring groups. Communication Theory, 16, 378–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00275.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00275.x, , & (2008). Why can't we just talk about it? An observational study of parents' and adolescents' conversations about sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 689–721. doi: 10.1177/0743558408323841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0743558408323841, , & ([Page 212]2007). Parental divorce disclosures, the factors that prompt them, and their impact on parents' and adolescents' well-being. Communication Monographs, 74, 78–103. doi: 10.1080/03637 750701196870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196870, , , & (1982). Changes in family relationships following divorce of adult child: Grandmother's perceptions. Journal of Divorce, 5, 49–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J279v05n01_05, & (2011). An integrative theory of the division of labor: Threshold level, social organization and sensemaking. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2011.534334, , & (1987). New views on the family life of the elderly and the near-elderly. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 227–234. doi:10.2307/352295 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352295(1977). Sibling solidarity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 177–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351073(1992). A transactional approach to close relationships: Courtship, weddings, and placemaking. In W. B.Walsh, K. H.Craik, & R. H.Price (Eds.), Person-environment psychology: Models and perspectives (pp. 193–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , , & (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1269–1287.doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x(2001). Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 355–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3184.108.40.2065(2006). Feeling caught between parents: Adult children's relations with parents and subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 142–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00243.x, & (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills or commitment to marriage?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1038–1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01038.x, & (1991). Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 26–46. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.110.1.26 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.26, & (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. New York, NY: Routledge.(2005). The grandparent-grandchild relationship: Implications for models of intergenerational communication. Human Communication Research, 31 (2), 268–294., , & (1997). From adolescent to young adult: A prospective study of parent-child relations during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 670–686. doi: 10.2307/353953 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353953(2011). United States life tables, 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports, 59(9). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.(2002). Developmental and contextual factors that influence gay fathers' parental competence: A review of the literature. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3, 67–78. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.127.116.11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1524-918.104.22.168([Page 213]2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469(2009). Adolescents' perspectives on relationships with grandparents: The contribution of adolescent, grandparent, and parent-grandparent relationship variables. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1057–1066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.007, , & (2007). The jury is in regarding adoption openness. In T. C.Atwood, L. A.Allen, V. C.Ravenel, & N. F.Callahan (Eds.), Adoption factbook IV (pp. 453–454). Alexandria, VA: National Council for Adoption.(1989). The social support functions of siblings in later life: A theoretical model. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033001005(B A Squared, LLC. (2012, October 6). Mother-in-law stories. Retrieved online from http://www.motherinlawstories.com2011). Grandparents raising grandchildren: Negotiating the complexities of role-identity conflict. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 306–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00781.x, & (2011). From narrative “inheritance” to narrative “momentum”: Past, present, and future stories in an international adoptive family. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 69–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2011.554618, & (2008). Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples. Developmental Psychology, 44, 102–116. doi: 10.1037/0012-1622.214.171.124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.199, , , & (1996). The many faces of dependency in old age. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.(2001). The grands and greats of very old black grandmothers. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065%2800%2900013-X(2010). Intergenerational relationship quality, gender, and grandparent involvement. Family Relations, 59, 28–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00584.x, , , , & (2001). Growing up with a gay parent: Views of 101 gay fathers on their sons' and daughters' experiences. Educational and Child Psychology, 18, 62–77., & (1993). Family bonds: Adoption and the practice of parenting. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.(2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00068.x(2006). Relational dialectics theory: Multivocal dialogues of family communication. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 130–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420(2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452230344([Page 214]Baxter, L. A. (Ed.). (forthcoming). Reframing “family” communicatively. Under contract with Peter Lang Publishers.2006). Types of communication triads perceived by young-adult stepchildren in established stepfamilies. Communication Studies, 57, 381–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970600945923, , & (2004). Stepchildren's perceptions of the contradictions in communication with stepparents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 447–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504044841, , , & (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford., & (1998). A guide to dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships. In B. M.Montgomery & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Dialectical approaches to studying relationships, (pp. 1–15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi: 10.1177/0265407599165001, & (2009). Empty ritual: Young-adult stepchildren's perceptions of the remarriage ceremony. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 467–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407509350872, , , , , , & (1989a). A comparison of thematic apperceptions of sibling affiliation, conflict, and separation at two periods of adulthood. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 53–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/L5XM-HNGJ-4YTT-8KUT(1989b). Understanding the value of siblings in old age. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 33–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033001004(1990). Predictors of variation in positive and negative affect toward adult siblings. Family Perspectives, 24, 245–262.(1993). Relationships between adult siblings. In A. E.Auhagen & M.von Salisch (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships (pp. 119–141). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, Verlage fur Psychologie.(1995). Sibling relationships in middle and old age. In R.Blieszner & V. H.Bedford (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the family (pp. 201–222). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.(1995). The origins of attachment security: “Classical” and contextual determinants. In S.Goldberg, R.Muir, & J.Kerr (Eds.), Attachment theory: Social, developmental, and clinical perspectives (pp. 153–183). London, England: Analytic Press., , & (1993). Is the “contract across generations” changing? Effects of population aging on obligations and expectations across age groups. In V. L.Bengtson & W. A.Achenbaum (Eds.), The changing contract across generations (pp. 3–23). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.(2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x(2005): From the margins to the center. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 1, 1–29. doi: 10.1300/J461 v01n03_01 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J461v01n03_01, , & ([Page 215]2006). “About as solid as a fishnet”: Symbolic construction of a legitimate parental identity for nonbiological lesbian mothers. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 201–220. doi: 10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_3, , & (2010). Gay men who become fathers via surrogacy: The transition to parenthood. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 6, 111–141. doi: 10.1080/15504281003704942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15504281003704942, , , & (2009). Theorizing lesbian and gay parenting: Past, present, and future scholarship. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 1, 117–132. doi: 10.1111/j.17562589.2009.00017.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00017.x(2011). Maternal instincts, biological clocks, and soccer moms: Gay men's parenting and family narratives. Symbolic Interaction, 34, 514–535. doi: 10.1525/si.2011.34.4.514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2011.34.4.514(2007). Gay men: Negotiating procreative, father, and family identities. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 366–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1741 3737.2007.00371.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00371.x, & (1993). Risks and benefits of open adoption. The Future of Children, 3, 125–138. doi: 10.2307/1602407 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1602407(2006). Correlates of oral sex and vaginal intercourse in early and middle adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 59–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00120.x, , , & (2006). Negative jealousy-related emotion rumination as consequences of romantic partner, cross-sex friend, and sibling jealousy expression. Communication Studies, 57, 363–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970600945907, & (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 480–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00714.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00714.x, & (2000). Raising our sons: Gay men as fathers. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 10, 61–77. doi: 10.1300/J041v10n01_04 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J041v10n01_04(2003). Bargaining and time in housework. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/378341, , , , & (2006). Close relationships in middle and late adulthood. In A. L.Vangelisti & D.Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 211–227). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606632.013(2007). Long-term effects of early parental loss due to divorce on the HPA axis. Hormones & Behavior, 51, 516–523. doi: 10.1016/j.yjbeh.2007/01/009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.009, , , , & (2002). College students' perceptions of social support from grandmothers and stepgrandmothers. College Student Journal, 36, 419–432.(2002). Painful self-disclosures of older adults in relation to aging stereotypes and perceived motivations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 275–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02021003004, & (2001). Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 197–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00197.x, & ([Page 216]1989). The sibling relationship as a housing alternative to institutionalization in later life. In L.Ade-Ridder & C. B.Hennon (Eds.), Lifestyles of the elderly (pp. 205–219). New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.(2010). Understanding frailty. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 65(3), 255. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp162(2010). Adolescents of the USA national longitudinal lesbian family study: Can family characteristics counteract the negative effects of stigmatization?Family Process, 49, 559–572.doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01340.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01340.x, & (2008). The U.S. National longitudinal lesbian family study (NLLFS): Homophobia, psychological adjustment, and protective factors. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 12, 455–471. doi: 10.1080/10894160802278630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10894160802278630, , , & (2008). Children in planned lesbian families: A cross-cultural comparison between the United States and the Netherlands. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78, 211–219. doi: 10.1037/a0012711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012711, , , , & (1977). A clarification of the concept of psychological father presence in families experiencing ambiguity of boundary. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 141–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351070(1999). Ambiguous loss. New York, NY: Harvard University Press.(1974). Structural variations in inter-sibling affect. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 48–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350993, & (2006). “You're my parent but you're not”: Dialectical tensions in stepchildren's perceptions about communicating with the nonresidential parent. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 30–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909880500420200, & (2012). Stepfamily communication. In A. L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Routledge handbook of family communication (, & (2nd ed., pp. 161–175). New York, NY: Routledge.1998). The role of rituals in the management of dialectical tensions of “old” and “new” in blended families. Communication Studies, 48, 101–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979809368523, , & (2003). “Parent teams” and the everyday interactions of co-parenting in stepfamilies. Communication Reports, 16, 93–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934210309384493, , & (2001). Developmental communication patterns of blended families: Exploring the different trajectories of blended families. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 221–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909880128112, , , , & (2006). Understudied and misunderstood: Communication in stepfamily relationships. In K.Floyd & M. T.Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 153–170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204369, , & (2008). Centered but not caught in the middle: Stepchildren's perceptions of dialectical [Page 217]contradictions in the communication of co-parents. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 33–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909880701799337, , , , & (1998). Masculinity and childcare: The reconstruction of fathering. Sociological Review, 46, 293–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00120, & (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51, 477–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x(2010). Coming out with our children: Turning points facilitating lesbian parent discourse with their children about family identity. Communication Reports, 23, 79–90. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2010.511398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2010.511398(2011). Understanding communication between lesbian parents and their children regarding outsider discourse about family identity. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 7, 264–284. doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2011.564946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2011.564946(2007). Children's perspectives on their relationships with grandparents following parental separation: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 16, 539–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00395.x, & , , & (2008). Gay men becoming fathers: A model of identity expansion. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 4, 521–541. doi: 10.1080/15504280802191772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15504280802191772, & (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor. American Journal of Sociology, 3, 652–688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230577(1998). Sibling relationship quality: Its causes and consequences. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.1(1988). Serial marriage: A heuristic analysis of an emerging family form. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 211–222. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.211, , & (2005). Reconceptualizing openness in adoption: Implications for theory, research, and practice. In D. M.Brodzinsky & J.Palacios (Eds.), Psychological issues in adoption: Research and practice (pp. 145–166). Westport, CT: Praegar Publishers.(2006). Family structural openness and communication openness as predictors in the adjustment of adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 9, 1–18. doi: 10.1300/J145v9n04_01 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v09n04_01(2007). Foreword. In R. A.Javier, A. L.Baden, F. A.Biafora & A.Camacho-Gingerich (Eds.), Handbook of adoption (pp. xi-xv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976633(1984). Children's understanding of adoption. Child Development, 55, 869–878. doi:10.2307/1130138 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130138, , & (2010). The kinkeeping connection: Continuity, crisis, and consensus. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 8, 338–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2010.520616, & (2002). African American extended families and extended kincare: How relevant is the foster care model for kinship care?Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 55–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0190-7409%2801%2900168-2, , & (1998). Grandparental impact in young adults' relationships with their closest grandparents: The role of relationship strength and [Page 218]emotional closeness. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 46, 267–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/2B7B-E3LH-74JJ-UJRY, & (2001). The influence of in-laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 614–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00614.x, , & (1990). Helping to make the transition from high school to college. In R. L.Emans (Ed.), Understanding undergraduate education (pp. 202–213). Vermillion: University of South Dakota Press., & (2012). Does this baby make me look straight? Confessions of a gay dad. Chicago, IL: Touchstone.(1987). The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Development, 58, 1101–1113. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130550, & (2007). Ethnic differences in marital quality and divorce. Social Science Research, 36, 945–967. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.001, & (Bureau of Counselor Affairs. (2011, November). Annual report on intercountry adoption. Retrieved from http://adoption.state.govBurleson, B., Albrecht, T., & Sarason, I. (Eds.). (1994). Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1994). Some neo-Darwinian rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773–789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.523, , & (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J.Canary & L.Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 6–23). New York, NY: Academic., & (1995). Relationship conflict: Conflict in parent-child, friendship, and romantic relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243795, , & (2001). Grandparents and coresident grandchildren in a youth cohort. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 541–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251301022005001(1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.(1998). Family matters: Secrecy and disclosure in the history of adoption. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1985). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory & Society, 14, 551–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00160017, , & (2004). Privacy in families. In A. L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 319–412). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (2009). Paying the price for economic development: The children of migrant worker in China. China Labor Bulletin Special Report, 1–70.(2007). The gendered nature of filial piety—A study among Chinese Canadians. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 22, 29–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9011-5, & (2001). Repetition of the remembered past: Patterns of separation-individuation in two generations of mothers and daughters. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18, 705–728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0736-97184.108.40.2065, , , & ([Page 219]2007). “I will speak out”: Narratives of resistance in contemporary Indian women's discourse in Hindu arranged marriages. Women & Language, 30, 5–19.(1991). Aunts' and uncles' relationship with their nieces and nephews: An exploratory study. Unpublished master's thesis. Kent State University, Ohio.(2000). The impact of grandparental proximity on maternal childcare in China. Population Research and Policy Review, 19, 571–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010618302144, , & (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 634–650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226830(1986). The new American grandparent: A place in the family, a life apart. New York, NY: Basic Books., & (2011). Stay-at-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Gender, couple dynamics, and social change. Gender & Society, 25, 642–664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243211417433(Child Trends DataBank. (2007). Adopted children. Retrieved from http://www.childtrends-databank.org.1974). Family structure and feminine personality. In M.Rosaldo & L.Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture, and society (pp. 43–66). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(2005). Contesting the myth of the “wicked stepmother”: Narrative analysis of an online support group. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 27–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310500034030(2007). The complete book of aunts. New York, NY: Twelve., & (2007). Single mothers, social capital, and work-family conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 34–60. doi: 10.1177/0192513X06292809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06292809(1979). Social services for elderly in relation to the kin network. Report to the NRTA-AARP Andrus Foundation.(1980). Sibling influence in adulthood: A life span perspective. In L. W.Poon (Ed.), Aging in the 1980's (pp. 455–462). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.(1982). Sibling influence throughout the life span. In M. E.Lamb & B.Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 267–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(1983). A comparison of helping behavior to elderly parents of adult children with intact and disrupted marriages. The Gerontologist, 23, 619–625. doi: 10.1093/geront/23.6.619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/23.6.619(1985a). Sibling relationships throughout the life cycle. In L.L'Abate (Ed.), The handbook of family psychology and therapy. Vol. 1 (pp. 177–214). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.(1985b). The role of siblings as family caregivers. In W. J.Sauer & R. T.Coward (Eds.), Social support networks and the care of the elderly (pp. 93–107). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.([Page 220]1988). Interpersonal relationships among elderly siblings: Implications for clinical practice. In M. D.Kahn & K. G.Lewis (Eds.), Siblings in therapy (pp. 435–456). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.(1989). Feelings of attachment to siblings and well being in later life. Psychology and Aging, 4, 211–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-79220.127.116.11(1990). Family support in relation to health problems of the elderly. In T. H.Brubaker (Ed.), Family relationships in later life ((2nd ed., pp. 218–228). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.1991). Sibling relationships in adulthood. In S. P.Pfeifer & M. B.Sussman (Eds.), Families: Intergenerational and generational connections (pp. 291–310). New York, NY: Haworth Press.(1994). Sibling relationship in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 7–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352697(1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York, NY: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6509-0(1990). The dialectic of marital and parental relationships within the stepfamily. Communication Monographs, 37, 44–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376184, , & (1999). Giving voice to childbearing teens: Views on sexuality and the reality of being a young parent. The Journal of School Nursing: The Official Publication of the National Association of School Nurses, 15, 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105984059901500102, & (2002). The uncle nook: Everything you need to know to be a kid's favorite relative. New York, NY: Marlowe.(2011). Communicatively forming developed adoptive identity: Explicating the association between parental communication, developed adoptive identity, and adoptee adjustment. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. (AAI3449892)(2010). “Forever kind of wandering”: Communicatively managing uncertainty in adoptive families. Journal of Family Communication, 10, 236–255. doi: 10.1080/15267431003682435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431003682435, & (1998). Attitudes toward men's intergenerational financial obligations to older and younger male family members following divorce. Personal Relationships, 5, 293–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00173.x, & (2000). Reinvestigation remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1288–1307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01288.x, , & (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.(2008). Intergenerational support and depression among elders in rural China: Do daughters-in-law matter?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 599–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00508.x, & (2010). Sibling relationships during the transition to adulthood. Child Development Perspective, 4, 87–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00123.x, & (2002). Gender. Cambridge, England: Polity.([Page 221]2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 826–859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639, & (2006). Black fatherhood: Invisible presence in America. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1989a). Contact between siblings in later life. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 14, 429–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3340651(1989b). Siblings as friends in later life. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 81–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033001008(1992). Life transitions and the adult sibling tie: A qualitative study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 972–982. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353176(2001). Family ties and aging. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2010). Family ties and aging ((2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1995). Closeness, confiding, and contact among siblings in middle and late adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 722–745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251395016006003, & (1990). Confidants and companions in later life: The place of family and friends. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45, S141–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.4.S141, & (2007). Ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic differences in young adults' self-disclosure. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 254–263. doi: 10.1037/10999809.13.3.254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.13.3.254, , & (2010). Historical perspectives on family diversity. In S. J.Ferguson (Ed.), Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families ((3rd ed., pp. 63–80). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.2005). Latino adolescents' adjustment, maternal depressive symptoms, and the mother-adolescent relationship. Family Relations, 54, 386–399.doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.00325.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.00325.x, , , & (1994). Friendly relations? Mothers and their daughters-in-law. London, England: Taylor & Francis.(2010). Role strain and online social support for childless stepmothers. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 868–887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407510393055, & (2007, November). Sainted or tainted: Stay-at-home fathers as dirty workers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association Convention, Chicago, IL.(1965). The significant Americans: A study of sexual behavior among the affluent. New York, NY: Appleton-Century., & (1997). Aunts: A celebration of those special women in our lives. Lincolnwood, IL: Contemporary Books.(1980). Discriminative parental solicitude: A biological perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 277–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351225, & (2003). Parent care by Indian and Belgian caregivers in their roles of daughter/daughter-in-law. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 736–749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022103258589, , & ([Page 222]2009). Grandparent-grandchild relationships: From families in contexts to families as contexts. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 69, 309–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/AG.69.4.d, , , & (1997). Service needs of relative caregivers: A qualitative analysis. Families in Society, 78, 502–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.819(2007). The role of child adrenocortical functioning in pathways between interparental conflict and child maladjustment. Developmental Psychology, 43, 918–930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1618.104.22.1688, , , & (2012). “It just kind of like falls in your hands”: Factors that influence black aunts' decisions to parent their nieces and nephews. Journal of Black Studies, 43, 231–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021934711415243(2000). Young adult children and grandchildren in primary caregiver roles to older relatives and their service needs. Family Relations, 49, 177–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00177.x, , & (2007). Lesbian mothers with planned families: A comparative study of internalized homophobia and social support. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 165–173. doi: 10.1037/0002-9422.214.171.124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-94126.96.36.199, , & (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243206293577(1987). The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12, 440–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494338(1998). Fictive kin, paper sons, and compadrazgo: Women of color and the struggle for family survival. In K. V.Hansen & A. I.Garey, (Eds.), Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 431–445). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.(2011). Stepchildren's communication to manage uncertainty in stepfamilies. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 36, 24–42.(2009). Navigating interdependence: How adolescents raised solely by grandparents experience their family relationships. Family Relations, 58, 162–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00544.x, & (1999). Disclosure between college students and their siblings. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 393–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3188.8.131.523, & (2004). “It's almost like I have a job, but I don't get paid”: Fathers at home reconfiguring work, care, and masculinity. Fathering, 2, 277–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.3149/fth.0203.277(2006). “Estrogen-filled worlds”: Fathers as primary caregivers and embodiment. The Sociological Review, 54, 698–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00667.x(2007). Do men mother? Fathering, care, and domestic responsibility. Toronto: Toronto University Press.(2001). Surviving and coping with emotional abuse in childhood. Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry, 6, 387–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359104501006003008(2010). “How can you just cut off a whole side of the family and say move on?” The reshaping of paternal grandparent-grandchild relationships following divorce or separation in the middle generation. Family Relations, 59, 587–598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00625.x, , & ([Page 223]1999). The impact of parental separation/divorce on grandparent-grandchild relationships. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 48, 191–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/XYX5-TR6Y-TGH5-EYN9, & (2002). Implications for grandparents when they lose contact with their grandchildren: Divorce, family feud, and geographical separation. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 8, 95–119., & (2006). Relating difficulty in a triangular world. In D. C.Kirkpatrick, S.Duck, & M. K.Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 225–232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , & (2004). Dyadic power theory: The construction of a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 235–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2004.9670133(2007). The influence of grandparents in single-mother families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 465–481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00377.x, & (1985). Sisters and brothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2008). Grandparents raising grandchildren in Australia: Exploring psychological health and grandparents' experience of providing kinship care. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 333–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00529.x, & (1993). Relationships with former in-laws: Normative guidelines and actual behavior. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 19, 69–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v19n03_05(1954). In-laws: Pro and con. New York, NY: Association Press.(1998). Life course theory as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x(2006). Exploring young adults' perspectives on communication with aunts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 499–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407506064217, & (2008). Academic aunting: Nurturing bonds between generations of feminists. Women & Language, 31, 35–43., & (2010). Aunting: Cultural practices that sustain family and community life. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press., & (2009). All's fair in love and sport: Black masculinity and domestic violence in the news. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 6, 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14791420802632087(2002). A labor of love or labor itself: Care work among adult brothers and sisters. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 836–856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251302236597, & (2010). Unemployment and mental disorders. International Journal of Mental Health, 39, 56–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/IMH0020-7411390203, , , & (Donaldson Adoption Institute. (2009, February). Old lessons for a new world: Applying adoption research and experience to assisted reproductive technology. Retrieved from http://www.adoptioninstitute.org2002). Narrating unemployment. Surry, England: Ashgate Publishers Ltd.(Facebook Newsroom. (2012). Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/2002). Grandparents: A new look at the supporting generation. Prometheus, NY: Amherst., & ([Page 224]2007). Premarital predictors of remarital quality: Implications for clinicians. Contemporary Family Therapy, 29, 9–23. doi: 10.1007/s10591-007-9024-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10591-007-9024-4, & (1990). Beyond the separate spheres. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353307(2000). The role of grandparents in the social support system of mothers of children with a physical disability. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 81, 370–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.1033(2001a). A distant closeness: Intimacy between parents and their children in later life. Generations, 25, 26–33.(2001b). Aging mothers and their adult daughters: A study in mixed emotions. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.(2002). Searching under the streetlight? Age biases in the personal and family relationships literature. Personal Relationships, 9, 415–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.09404, & (1983a). Married men and their mothers. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 393–402.(1983b). Mothers and mothers-in-law. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 187–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351307(1986). Linked lives: Adult daughters and their mothers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.(2004). Mothers' and daughters' perceptions of turning points that affected closeness in the relationship over time. Unpublished master's thesis, Arizona State University.(2008). Adaptive communicative behavior of mothers and their adult daughters after a breast cancer diagnosis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.(Coping together, side by side: Enriching mother-daughter communication during the breast cancer journey. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.(forthcoming).2006). Communication in mother-adult daughter relationships. In K.Floyd & M.Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, & (2012). “Linked lives”: Mother-adult daughter communication after a breast cancer diagnosis. In F.Dickson & L.Webb (Eds.), Communication for families in crisis: Theories, research, strategies (pp. 179–204). New York, NY: Peter Lang. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204369.n1, & (1994). All in the family: Interpersonal communication in kin relationships. In M. L.Knapp & G. R.Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (, & (2nd ed., pp. 726–771). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 275–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00324.x, & (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0061470([Page 225]1995). Adolescent development and transitions to motherhood. Pediatrics, 96(2), 273–277., , , & (1995). Gender and closeness among friends and siblings. Journal of Psychology, 129, 193–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1995.9914958(1996a). Brotherly love I: The experience of closeness in the fraternal dyad. Personal Relationships, 3, 369–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00122.x(1996b). Communicating closeness among siblings: An application of the gendered closeness perspective. Communication Research Reports, 13, 27–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099609362067(1997). Brotherly love II: A developmental perspective on liking, love, and closeness in the fraternal dyad. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 196–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3184.108.40.206(2006). Communicating affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606649(2006). The theory of natural selection: An evolutionary approach to family communication. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 325–340). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420, & (2000). Affection received from fathers as a predictor of men's affection with their own sons: Tests of the modeling and compensation hypotheses. Communication Monographs, 67, 347–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376516, & (Floyd, K., & Morman, M. T. (Eds.). (2006). Widening the family circle: New research on family communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/97814522043692003). Human affection exchange: VII. Affection communication in the sibling/spouse/sibling-in-law triad. Communication Quarterly, 51, 247–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370309370155, & (2008). Affectionate communication received from spouses predicts stress hormone levels in healthy adults. Communication Monographs, 75, 351–368. doi:10.1080/03637750802512371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750802512371, & (1997). Differential accounts of closeness in older adult sibling relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 843–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407597146008, , , , & (2006). Adult grandchildren's accounts of closeness and changes in their grandparent relationships. Journal of the Northwest Communication Association, 35, 1–22., & (2009). Motives for sibling communication across the lifespan. Communication Quarterly, 57, 51–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370802662499(2010). Responses of young adult grandchildren to grandparent's painful self-disclosures. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 75–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351680, & (2002). Introduction. In S.Franklin & S.McKinnon (Eds.), Relative values: Reconfiguring kinship studies (pp. 1–28). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383222-001, & (2000). Birthmother perceptions of the psychologically present adopted child: Adoption openness and boundary ambiguity. Family Relations, 49, 425–433. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00425.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00425.x, , & ([Page 226]1999). Ethnic identity development of internationally adopted children and adolescents: Implications for family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 43–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1999.tb01109.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1999.tb01109.x(2010). New economics of marriage: The rise of wives. Pew Center for Research. Internet release date: January 19, 2010., & (2002). South Korean adoptees growing up in White America: Negotiating race and culture. In J.Martin, T. K.Nakayana, & L. A.Flores (Eds.), Reading in cultural contexts ((2nd ed., pp. 266–275). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.1982). The contribution of peers and siblings to the parenting process. In M.Kostelnik (Ed.), Child Nurturance: Vol. 2. Patterns of supplementary parenting (pp. 69–100). New York, NY: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6631-1_3, & (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press., & (1999). Ask the children: What America's children really think about working parents. New York, NY: William Morrow.(1993). Kinkeeping and friend keeping among older women: The effect of marriage. Gerontologist, 33, 675–681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/33.5.675, & (2004). The family of the future: What do we face? In A. L.Vangelisti (Ed.), The handbook of family communication (pp. 675–687). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2006). Diversity's impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. In L. H.Turner & R.West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233024(2006). Systems theory: Patterns and (w)holes in family communication. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 309–324). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420, , & (2009, November). Gay male partners achieving parenthood: Stories of communicative complexities and challenges. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association Conference, Chicago, IL., & (2011). Mothers-in-law against daughters-in-law: Domestic violence and legal discourses around mother-in-law violence against daughters-in-law in India. Women's Studies International Forum, 34, 420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2011.06.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.06.006, & (1998). An exploratory study of grandparents' and stepgrandparents' financial obligations to grandchildren and stepgrandchildren. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 39–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407598151003, & (2004). Stepfamily relationships: Development, dynamics, and interventions. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9112-6, & (2006). Divorce as prelude to stepfamily living the consequences of re-divorce. In M. A.Fine & J. H.Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution (pp. 409–434). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , & ([Page 227]2011). Patterns of stepchild-stepparent relationship development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 396–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00814.x, , & (1996). Self and other: A Chinese perspective on interpersonal relationships. In W. B.Gudykunst, S.Ting-Toomey, & T.Nishida (Eds.), Communication in personal relationships across cultures (pp. 81–101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1996). Perceived social support from family, school, and peers: Relationship between emotional and behavioral problems among adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1657–1664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199612000-00018, & (1999). The National Lesbian Family Study: 2. Interviews with mothers of toddlers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 362–369. doi: 10.1037/h0080410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080410, , , , , & (2000). The National Lesbian Family Study: 3. Interviews with mothers of five-year-olds. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 542–549. doi: 10.1037/h0087823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087823, , , , , & (2005). The National Lesbian Family Study: 4. Interviews with 10-year-old children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75, 518–524. doi: 10.1037/0002-94220.127.116.118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9418.104.22.1688, , , , & (1996). The National Lesbian Family Study: 1. Interviews with prospective mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66, 272–281. doi: 10.1037/h0080178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080178, , , , , , & (2006). The USA National Lesbian Family Study: Interviews with mothers of 10-year-olds. Feminism & Psychology, 16, 175–192. doi: 10.1177/0959-353506062972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959-353506062972, , , , & (2011). Census 2010 Snapshot Series, The Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wpcontent/uploads/Census2010Snapshot-US-v2.pdf, & (1993). Kinkeeping and distress: Gender, recipients of care, and work-family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 598–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353341, & (2012). The grandparent-grandchild relationship in childhood and adulthood: A matter on continuation?Personal Relationships, 19, 267–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01354.x, , & (2008). Adaptation and transformation: The transition to adoptive parenthood for gay male couples. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 4, 205–243. doi: 10.1080/15504280802096872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15504280802096872(2009). Family outings: Disclosure practices among adopted youth with gay and lesbian parents, Adoption Quarterly, 12, 205–228. doi: 10.1080/10926750903313344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10926750903313344, , & (1996, Spring). Family complexity and the grandparent role. Generations, 17–23., , & (1986). Expressive relations and social support. In H. L.Kendig (Ed.), Aging and families: A social network perspective (pp. 63–84). Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin., & ([Page 228]2012). Gay fathers' negotiation of gender role strain: A qualitative inquiry. Fathering, 10, 119–139. doi: 0.3149/fth.1002.119 http://dx.doi.org/10.3149/fth.1002.119(2008). Communication accommodation theory. In L. A.Baxter & D. O.Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 161–174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2009). Becoming involved in raising a relative's child: Reasons, caregiver motivations and pathways to informal kinship care. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 300–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00596.x, , , , , & (1996). Motivations to care: Daughters- and sons-in-law caring for relatives with Alzheimer's disease. Family Relations, 45, 37–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584768(1986). The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 703–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352563(1990). Patterns of support among in-laws in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 67–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251390011001005(1989a). Generational solidarity. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033001003(1989b). Sibling relationships in old age: A typology. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 37–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/VGYX-BRHN-J51V-0V39(2011). Substance use by adolescents of the USA: National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 1231–1240. doi: 10.1177/1359105311403522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105311403522, , & (2007). Fathers' frames for childrearing: Evidence toward a “masculine concept of caregiving.”Journal of Family Communication, 7, 265–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430701392164(2000). Changes in closeness between adult children and their parents: A turning point analysis. Communication Reports, 13, 79–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934210009367727(2003). Stepfamily communication strengths: Understanding the ties that bind. Human Communication Research, 29, 41–80.(2010). Gay fathers. In M. E.Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (, & (5th ed., pp. 319–314). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.2009). Investigating elderly sibling types, relational maintenance, and lifespan affect, cognition, and behavior. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 17, 140–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15456870903024852, , & (1982). Emotional responsiveness in marital conversations. Journal of Communication, 32, 108–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb02504.x(2003). Correlates of gay and lesbian couples' relationship satisfaction and relationship dissolution. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 23–43. doi: 10.1300/J082v4n01_02 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v45n01_02, , , , , , & (2004). Risk and resilience in lesbian and gay couples: Comment on Solomon, Rothblum, and Balsam (2004). Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 290–292. doi: 10.1037/0893-322.214.171.1240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3126.96.36.1990([Page 229]2002). Gay and lesbian couples in therapy: Homophobia, relational ambiguity, and social support. In A. S.Gurman & N. S.Jacobson (Eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (, & (3rd ed., pp. 546–568). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2003). Whom would you rather help: An acquaintance not responsible for her plight or a responsible sibling?Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 331–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598448, , & (1993). Fatherhood in America. New York, NY: Basic Books.(2000). Openness in adoption: Research with the adoption kinship network. Adoption Quarterly, 4, 45–65. doi: 10.1300/J145v04n01_04 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v04n01_04(2000). Adoptive identity: How contexts within and beyond the family shape developmental pathways. Family Relations, 49, 379–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00379.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00379.x, , , & (1999). Narratives of adoptive parents: Perspectives from individual and couple interviews. In B.Fiese, A.Sameroff, H.Grotevant, F.Wambolt, S.Dickstein, & D.Fravel (Eds.), The stories that families tell: Narrative coherence, narrative interaction, and relationship beliefs (pp. 69–81). Malden, MA: Blackwell., , , & (2005). Openness in adoption: Outcomes for adolescents within their adoptive kinship networks. In D.Brodzinsky & J.Palacios, (Eds.), Psychological issues in adoption: Theory, research and application (pp. 166–186). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing., , & (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19. doi: 10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.52 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.206, & (1986). Adult intergenerational relationships: Parents and children. In L. E.Troll (Ed.), Review of human development (pp. 191–226). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.(2005). The social separation of old and young: A root of ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 343–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00409.x, & (2001). Depressed adolescents of depressed and non-depressed mothers: Tests of an interpersonal impairment hypothesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 284–294. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.284, & (1997). Theorizing masculinity with/in the media. Communication Theory, 8, 183–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00217.x(2001). “Grandma, what big teeth you have!” The social construction of grandparenting in American business and academe. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 652–676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251301022005007(2004). Family studies and intergenerational studies: Intersections and opportunities. Journal of Intergenerational Relationship, 2, 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J194v02n03_02, & ([Page 230]2009). The contradictions of identity-work for parents of visibly adopted children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 634–658. doi: 10.1177/0265407509353393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407509353393(2009, May 4). Recession prompts gender role reversal. ABC News Online: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=7497859&page=1(2012, March 14). Huggies pulls ads after dads insulted. ABC News Online: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/lifestyle/2012/03/huggies-pulls-ads-after-dads-insulted/(2000a). Communication media use in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Journal of Communication, 50, 56–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02863.x(2000b). Communicative predictors of solidarity in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 743–766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407500176003(2004). Relational, role, and social identity as expressed in grandparents' personal web sites. Communication Studies, 55, 268–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388621(2000). Affiliation, pride, exchange and distance in grandparents' accounts of relationships with their college-age grandchildren. Journal of Communication, 50, 31–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02851.x, & (2005). Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes towards older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 393–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271577, , , & (2006). Communicative predictors of group salience in the intergenerational setting. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 181–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_2, , & (Grandparent-grandchild relations. In A.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication. New York, NY: Routledge., , & (in press).2010). “What it means to be a man”: Examining hegemonic masculinity in Two and a Half Men. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3, 526–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01084.x(Hayslip, B., & Kaminski, P. L. (Eds.). (2008). Parenting the custodial grandchild: Implications for clinical practice. New York, NY: Springer.1998). Theorizing men and men's theorizing: Varieties of discursive practices in men's theorizing of men. Theory and Society, 27, 781–816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006992624071(1994). Theorizing unities and differences between men and between masculinities. In H.Brod & M.Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 94–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243627, & (1985). Interdependence in informal support systems: The case of elderly, urban widows. In W. A.Peterson & J.Quadagno (Eds.), Social bonds in later life (pp. 165–186). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(2003). The impact of openness on adoption agency practices. Adoption Quarterly, 6, 31–51. doi: 10.1300/J145v06n03_03 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v06n03_03, , , & (2004). Unscripted motherhood: Lesbian mothers negotiating incompletely institutionalized family relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 739–762. doi: 10.1177/0265407504047834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047834([Page 231]2006). I do, but I can't: The impact of marriage denial on the mental health and sexual citizenship of lesbians and gay men in the United States. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 3, 33–49. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2006.3.1.33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2006.3.1.33, & (2000). Maintaining nonvoluntary relationships with disliked partners: An investigation into the use of distancing behaviors. Human Communication Research, 26, 458–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00765.x(2006). Cover stories as family communication practice. In L. H.Turner & R.West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (p. 129–142). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233024, , & (1999). Family functioning and the adjustment of adolescent siblings in diverse types of families. In E. M.Hetherington, S. H.Henderson, & D.Reiss (Eds.), Adolescent siblings in stepfamilies: Family functioning and adolescent adjustment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64, 1–25.(2006). Maternal men—perverts and deviants? Making sense of gay men as foster carers and adopters. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 2, 93–114. doi: 10.1300/J461v02n01_05 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J461v02n01_05(2006). Marriage among African American women: A gender perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37, 421–440.(1996). The effects of multiple divorces on person perception. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 25, 87–93. doi: 10.1300/J087v25n01_06 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v25n01_06, & (2007). Communication between grandparents and grandchildren in geographically separated relationships. Communication Studies, 58, 281–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970701518371, & (1998). (Re)constructing relationships with grandparents: A turning point analysis of granddaughters' relational development with maternal grandmothers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 46, 287–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/00GV-5PWF-UDNH-EHDV, , & (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999%2867%2990010-4, & (1994). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 262–272). Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (2004). Media, home, and family. New York, NY: Routledge., , & (2011). Age and sex composition: 2010 census brief. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf, & (May,1994). Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, 240–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.5.P240, , , & (1998). Grandparenthood in African American families. In M. E.Szinovacz (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 70–86). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press., & ([Page 232]1982). Changes in functions of three relations during adolescence. Developmental Psychology; Developmental Psychology, 18, 806–811. doi: 10.1037/001216220.127.116.116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1618.104.22.1686, & (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124, , , , & (2012, January 9–15). Behind every great woman: The rise of the CEO mom has created a new kind of trophy husband. Bloomberg BusinessWeek, 54–59.(1996). The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. In S.Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/Sociology (pp. 168–193). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.(1987). Impaired natural killer cell activity during bereavement. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 1, 98–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-1591%2887%2990011-0, , , , & (1988). Extending the extended family: The mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationships of Black women. Family Relations, 37, 293–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584565, & (1998). Parental conflict, marital disruption and children's emotional well-being. Social Forces, 76, 905–936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/76.3.905(1994). Grandparents who parent their grandchildren: Circumstances and decisions. The Gerontologist, 34, 206–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/34.2.206(2008). A model for predicting stress levels and marital satisfaction for stepmothers utilizing a stress and coping approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 119–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407507086809, , , , , & (1988a). Active and latent functions of grandparenting during the divorce process. The Gerontologist, 28, 185–191. doi: 10.1093/geront/28.2.185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/28.2.185(1988b). Postdivorce reorganization of relationships between divorcing children and their parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 221–231. doi: 10.2307/352441 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352441(2000). Kinship and gender. In D.Demo, K.Allen, & M. A.Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 128–148). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.(2002). The gay baby boom: The psychology of gay parenthood. New York, NY: New York University Press., & (1993). The relational self: A model of women's development. In J.van Mens-Verhulst, J.Schreurs, & L.Woertman (Eds.), Daughtering and mothering: Female subjectivity reanalyzed (pp. 135–144). New York, NY: Routledge.(1989). Where is the “family” in family communication?: Exploring families' self-definitions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 17, 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909888909365282(1994). Situated address and the social construction of “in-law” relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 55, 196–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372938(2004). Imagining families through stories and rituals. In A. L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 513–538). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & ([Page 233]2009). Investigating the role of identity gaps among communicative and relational outcomes within the grandparent-grandchild relationship: The young-adult grandchildren's perspective. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 456–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310903279067, & (1998). Asian grandparents. In M. E.Szinovacz (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 97–112). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.(1996). Fathers, sons, Vietnam: Masculinity and betrayal in the life narratives of Vietnam veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. American Studies, 1, 63–94.(1994). Scientific issues in biomedical research with children. In M. A.Grodin & L. H.Leonhard (Eds.), Children as research subjects: Science, ethics, and law (pp. 29–45). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.(1988). Discourse about adoption in adoptive families. Journal of Family Psychology, 1, 406–433. doi: 10.1037/h0080464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080464, & (2008). Stepfamily address terms: “Sometimes they mean something and sometimes they don't.”Journal of Family Communication, 8, 238–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430802397153, , & (2012). Kinship categories across languages reflect general communicative principles. Science, 336, 1049–1054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1218811, & (1988). Marital discord and immunity in males. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 213–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198805000-00001, , , , , & (2001). Daughters-in-law in Korean caregiving families. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36, 399–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01987.x(1994). Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U.Kim, H. C.Triandis, C.Kagitcibasi, S-C., Choi, & G.Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 19–40). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1997). The legacy of grandparenting: Childhood experiences with grandparents and current involvement with grandchildren. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 848–859. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353787, & (2000). Church, family, and friends. In G. H.Elder & R. D.Conger (Eds.), Children of the land: Adversity and success in rural America (pp. 151–163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press., , & (2003). An organizational communication challenge to the discourse of work and family research: From problematics to empowerment. Communication Yearbook27 (pp. 1–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., , , , & (1964). Shared fate: A theory and method of adoptive relationships. Port Angeles, WA: Ben-Simon Publications.(1985). Consanguinity and kin level: Their relative importance to the helping network of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 228–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/40.2.228(1986). Contact with and perceptions of the elderly. The Gerontologist, 26, 309–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/26.3.309, , & ([Page 234]2005). Family ties: Communicating identity through jointly told family stories. Communication Monographs, 72, 365–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750500322453(2012). Accounting for lesbian-headed families: Lesbian mothers' responses to discursive challenges. Communication Monographs, 79, 475–498. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2012.723812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.723812, & (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48, 59–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368491, & (2002). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12, 70–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00260.x, & (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (pp. 50–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420, & (2000). When mothers turn to their adolescent daughters: Predicting daughters' vulnerability to negative adjustment outcomes. Family Relations, 49, 301–309.doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00301.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00301.x, , & (2002). Mother-to-daughter disclosure after divorce: Are there costs and benefits?Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 469–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020987509405, , , & (1940/2004). The unemployed man and his family. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.(1985). Grandparenthood and the “new social contract.” In V. L.Bengtson & J. F.Robertson (Eds.), Grandparenthood (pp. 159–172). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1981). Grandparents/grandchildren: The vital connection. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press/Doubleday., & (2009). Childhood parental divorce and cortisol in young adulthood: Evidence for mediation by family income. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 1363–1369. doi: 10.2307/3005698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.008, & (2011, August). The relationship between economic downturns and the proportion of stay-at-home father households. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Las Vegas, NV., & (2011). “Instead of growing under her heart I grew in it”: The relationships between adoption entrance narratives and adoptees' self-concept. Communication Quarterly, 59, 179–199. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.563440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.563440, & (2011). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 2009. Current Population Reports, 70–125. http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-125.pdf, & (2000). My name is … In M. W.Lustig & J.Koester (Eds.), Among us: Essays on identity, belonging, and intercultural competence (pp. 18–23). New York, NY: Longman.([Page 235]2001). “He was our child from the moment we walked into that room”: Entrance stories of adoptive parents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 785–803. doi: 10.1177/0265407501186003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407501186003, & (2004). How the socio-cultural context shapes women's divorce experience in Hong Kong. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35, 33–50., , & (1999). Assessing explanations for sex differences in emotional support: A test of the different cultures and skill specialization accounts. Human Communication Research, 25, 307–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00448.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00448.x, & (2006). Social learning theory: Modeling and communication in the family context. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (pp. 260–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420, , & (1990). Divorce history and self-reported psychological distress in husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 701–708. doi: 10.2307/352935 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352935(1991a). The relations between reported well-being and divorce history, availability of a proximate adult, and gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 71–78. doi: 10.2307/353134 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353134(1991b). The dissolution of gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 265–278. doi: 10.1177/0265407591082006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082006(1997). Adjustment to relationship dissolution in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual partners. Personal Relationships, 4, 145–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00136.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00136.x(1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 553–568. doi: 10.2307/353528 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353528(2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples?Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 880–900. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00060.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00060.x(1990). Adolescent daughter/midlife mother dyad: A new look at separation and self-definition. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 593–606. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00233.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00757094, & (2007). Gender differences in caregiving: A case in Chinese Canadian caregivers. Journal of Women & Aging, 19, 161–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J074v19n03_11, , & (2000). The history of research on father involvement: An overview. Marriage & Family Review, 29, 23–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J002v29n02_03(2004). African American adolescents' perceptions of family interaction: Kinship support, parent-child relationships, and teen adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 547–558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000048068.55441.d6, & (1999). Research into action: Recommended intervention strategies for grandparent caregivers. Family Relations, 48, 381–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585245([Page 236]2006). Family storytelling as communication practice. In L. H.Turner & R. L.West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 109–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233024, & (2007). Aunts, uncles—nieces, nephews: Kinship relations over the lifespan. Educational Gerontology, 23, 75–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601270600894279, & (1991). The fluctuating image of the 20th century American father. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 987–997. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353002, , , , & (1994). Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York, NY: Basic Books., & (1996). A binding tie: Supportive communication of family kinkeepers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 200–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889609365451, & (2004). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Developmental Psychology, 40, 993. doi: 10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.523, & (2012). Growing up in a lesbian family: The life experiences of the adult daughters and sons of lesbian mothers. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 8, 243–257. doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2012.677233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2012.677233, , & (2002). Experience of caregiving daughters-in-law in South Korea. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 2A.(1990). Sibling relationships in adulthood: Contact patterns and motivations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 431–440. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353037, , & (2006). Social theories: Social constructionism and symbolic interactionism. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 229–242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420(1982). Kinship interaction over the family life span. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 197–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351273(1998). “Sometimes you don't feel ready to be an adult or a mom”: The experience of adolescent pregnancy. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing: Official Publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc., 11, 7–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.1998.tb00425.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.1998.tb00425.x, , & (2003). Mortality in parents after death of a child in Denmark: A nationwide follow-up study. Lancet, 361, 363–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2803%2912387-2, , , & (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 861–878. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00532.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00532.x, & (2003). Predictors of grandparent-grandchild relational solidarity in Taiwan. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 537–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02654075030204006, & (2004). Age identity representation in on-line discourse. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 261–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.03.006, , & (2010). Differing effects of coping strategies on mental health during prolonged unemployment: A longitudinal analysis. Human Relations, 63, 637–665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726709342930, & ([Page 237]2008, November). The competing discourse of ‘Mr.” and “Mom”: The dialectical tension of gendered identity expressed by stay-at-home dads in an online discussion group. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.(2006). All in the extended family: Effects of grandparents, aunts, and uncles on educational attainment. The American Economic Review, 96, 275–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282806777212099(2005). Information-processing biases in young adults from bereaved and divorced families. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 309–313. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.309, & (2009). Negative relationships in the family-of-origin predict attenuated cortisol in emerging adults. Hormones & Behavior, 55, 412–417. doi: 10.1016/j.yhben.2008.12.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.12.007, , & (2006). Mother's discussion with daughters following divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 46, 29–55. doi: 10.1300/J087v46n01_03 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v46n01_03, , & (2009). Does it really feel the same? Changes in life satisfaction following repeated life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 363–381. doi: 10.1037/a0015809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015809, & (1997). Constructing fatherhood: Discourses and experiences. London, England: Sage., & (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 413–425., & (1997). Adult child-parent relationships. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 79–102. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.79 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.79(1993). Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choices? A twin study of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 56–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206, & (1998). Coping as a communal process. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 579–607. doi: 10.1177/0265407598155001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407598155001, , , & (1974). The psychology of sex differences (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press., & (1999). Boundary ambiguity and coparental conflict after divorce: An empirical test of a family systems model of the divorce process. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 588–598. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353562, , & (2007). Age and the desire to marry. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 706–721. doi: 10.1177/0192513X06297272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06297272, & (2004). Gay men choosing parenthood. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.(2006). Cohabitation and child well-being. Gender Issues, 23, 21–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03186775(2011). Affectionate communication between grandparents and grandchildren: Examining grandchildren's relational attitudes and behaviors. Southern States Communication Journal, 76, 424–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2010.508554, & ([Page 238]2010). Relational maintenance behaviors in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Communication Research Reports, 27, 68–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824090903526521, , & (1995). The aging family. In M. A.Fitzpatrick & A. L.Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 344–374). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1987). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: The effects of proximity on conflict and stress. Family Relations, 36, 385–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584488, & (2011). Births: Final data for 2009. Supplemental Tables. National Vital Statistics, 60(1). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_01_tables.pdf, , , , , , & (1997). The relationship between perceived understanding and self-disclosure in the sibling relationship. Communication Research Reports, 14, 331–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388676, , & (2005). Perceptions of the adult sibling relationship. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 107–116., , & (2006). “About as solid as a fish net”: Symbolic construction of a legitimate parental identity for nonbiological lesbian mothers. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 201–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_3, , & (2006). What is highly personal information and how is it related to self-disclosure decision-making? The perspective of college students. Communication Research Reports, 23, 85–92. doi: 10.1080/08824090600668915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824090600668915, , & (1996). Negative family environment as a predictor of boy's future status on measures of hostile attitudes, interview behavior, and anger expression. Health Psychology, 15, 30–37. doi: 10.1037/0278-6220.127.116.11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-618.104.22.168, , , & (1987). Provision of care to old parents: Division of care among adult children. Research on Aging, 9, 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0164027587009001002(2005). Reaching beyond the dyad: Research on adult siblings. In V.Bengtson, A. C.Acock, K. R.Allen, P.Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M.Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 181–184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172(2012). Time for “the Talk” … Now what? Autonomy support and structure in mother-daughter conversations about sex. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 1–24. doi: 10.1177/02724316 12449385, , & (2005). Distant lives, still voices: Sistering in family sociology. Sociology, 39, 623–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038505056022(2004). Generativity and the narrative ecology of family life. In M. W.Pratt & B. H.Fiese (Eds.), Family stories and the life course across time and generations (pp. 235–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.([Page 239]1986). Personality and multiple divorce: A prospective study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 161–164. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198603000-00006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198603000-00006, & (2001). Plasticity of the hippocampus: Adaptation to chronic stress and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 933, 265–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05830.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05830.x(1996). Patterns of change in early childhood aggressive-disruptive behavior: Gender differences in predictions from early coercive and affectionate mother-child interactions. Child Development, 67, 2417–2433. doi: 10.2307/1131631 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131631, , , & (1985). The effects of siblings on the life satisfaction of the rural elderly. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352071(2007). Open adoptions: Longitudinal outcomes for the adoption triad. In R. A.Javier, A. L.Baden, F. A.Biafora, & A.Camacho-Gingerich (Eds.), Handbook of adoption: Implications for researchers, practitioners, and families (pp. 175–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976633, , , & (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.(2009a). Gender crossing, work and family configurations and career outcomes. In S.Sweet & J.Casey (Eds.), Work and family encyclopedia. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network.(2009b). Constructing breadwinning-mother identities: Moral, personal and political positioning. Women's Studies Quarterly, 37, 136–154.(2012). Varieties of stay-at-home fathering identities: Masculinity, caregiving and choice. Paper submitted to the Eastern Sociological Association, Boston, MA.(2006). Family and work socializing communication: Messages, gender, and ideological implications. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 161–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_1, , , , & (2012, February). A qualitative analysis of explanations for the emergence of reverse traditional work and family arrangements. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Eastern Sociological Society, Philadelphia, PA., , & (2011). At-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Variations in constructing work and family lives. Women & Language, 32, 9–40., & (2005). Decreased cortisol awakening response after early loss experience. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 568–576. doi: 10.1016.j.psyneuen.2005.01.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.01.006, & (2010). The female breadwinner: Phenomenological experience and gendered identity in work/family spheres. Sex Roles, 62, 2–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9714-5(2002). Strangers and kin: The American way of adoption. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.([Page 240]2010). Job insecurity, socio-economic circumstances and depression. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1401–1407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709991802, , , , , & (2007). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: Understanding the relationship and what makes them friends or foe. Westport, CT: Praeger.(1996). A systemic approach to in-law dilemmas. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22, 469–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1996.tb00221.x(2005). Grandparental investment as a function of relational uncertainty and emotional closeness with parents. Human Nature, 16, 292–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12110-005-1012-5, & (2004, May). The role of physical separation in the sibling relationship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.(2006). Communication among peers: Adult sibling relationships. In K.Floyd & M. T.Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle (pp. 21–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204369(2009, November). The communication of social support in adult full sibling and stepsibling relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL., & (2011). Differential solicitude of social support in different types of adult sibling relationships. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 220–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2011.554749, , & (2011). The differential use of relational maintenance behaviors in adult sibling relationships. Communication Studies, 62, 258–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.555490, , & (2011). Parent-in-law privacy management: An examination of the links among relational uncertainty, topic avoidance, in-group status, and in-law satisfaction. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 237–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2010.544633(2005). Generative uncle and nephew relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1226–1236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00212.x(2010). The forgotten kin: Aunts and uncles. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.(Social capitalization in personal relationships. In C.Agnew (Ed.), Social influences on close relationships: Beyond the dyad. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press., , , & (in press).2005). Compensatory of sibling support in emerging adulthood: Variations in loneliness, self-esteem, depression, and life satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 743–755.doi: 10.1177/0265407505056447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056447(2002). Family communication, maternal and paternal expectations, and college students' suicidality. Journal of Family Communication, 2, 167–184. doi: 10.1207/S15327698JFC0204_01 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0204_01, & (2004). Communication among grandmothers, mothers, and adult daughters: A qualitative study of maternal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.([Page 241]2006). Perceptions of parental communication orientation, perfectionism, and disordered eating behaviors of sons and daughters. Health Communication, 19(2), 153–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1902_7, & (2004). Toward a descriptive model of parent-offspring communication about alcohol and other drugs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 69–91. doi: 10.1177/0265407504039846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504039846, & (2008). Family communication and disordered eating patterns. International Journal of Psychology Research, 3(3), 1–26., & (2010). More than just openness: Developing and validating a measure of targeted parent-child communication about alcohol. Health Communication, 25(4), 293–302. doi: 10.1080/10410231003698952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410231003698952, & (2012). The convergence communication scale: Development and evaluation of an assessment of interpersonal submission. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 1036–1057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407512443617, & (2013). Children are in families too! The presence of children in communication research. Journal of Family Communication, 13, 150–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.768251, , & (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2008). Intergenerational relationships and affectual solidarity between grandparents and young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 182–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00470.x(2010). Continuity and change in grandchildren's closeness to grandparents: Consequences of changing intergenerational ties. Marriage & Family Review, 46, 366–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2010.528320(2008). Gendered power relations among women: A study of household decision making in Black, lesbian stepfamilies. American Sociological Review, 73, 335–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300208(2011, Winter). Role reversal. Rebel, 65–70.(2000). Perceptions of communicative control strategies in mother-daughter dyads across the life span. Journal of Communication, 50, 48–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02852.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02852.x, & (2002). A “changing culture of fatherhood”: Effects on affectionate communication, closeness, and satisfaction in men's relationships with their fathers and their sons. Western Journal of Communication, 66, 395–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310209374746, & (2006). The good son: Men's perceptions of the characteristics of sonhood. In K.Floyd & M. T.Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 37–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204369, & (2012). An exploratory analysis of critical incidents of closeness in the mother/son relationship. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 22–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2011.629969, & (2006). The difficulties of in-law relationships. In D. C.Kirkpatrick, S.Duck, & M. K.Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 101–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.([Page 242]2008). Toward a triangular theory of the communication relationships of in-laws: Theoretical proposal and social relations analysis of relational satisfaction and private disclosure in in-law triads. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 264–292. doi: 10.1080/15267430802387161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430802397161(2008). Assessments of disclosure from the in-laws: Links among disclosure topics, family privacy orientations, and relational quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 333–357. doi: 10.1177/0265407507087962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407507087962, & (2011). In-laws or outlaws: The dark and bright in in-law relationships. In W. R.Cupach & B. H.Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships II (pp. 217–242). New York, NY: Routledge., & (2008). Disclosure from in-laws and the quality of in-law and marital relationships. Communication Quarterly, 56, 427–444. doi: 10.1080/01463370802453642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370802453642, , , & (2004). Mothers' reactions to children misbehaving in ways that can lead to injury: Implications for gender differences in children's risk taking and injuries. Sex Roles, 50, 103–118. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000011076.43831.a6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000011076.43831.a6, & (Movement Advancement Project, Family Equality Council, and Center for American Progress (2011). All children matter: How legal and social inequalities hurt LGBT families. Retrieved from http://www.lgbtmap.org/all-children-matter-full-report2004). The impact of religious homogeneity on the rate of divorce in the United States. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 338–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2004.00095.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2004.00095.x, , , & (2003). The prevalence of PTSD following the violent death of a child and predictors of change 5 years later. Journal of Traumatic Stress16(1), 17–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022003126168, , , & (1998). Sibling communication satisfaction as a function of interpersonal solidarity, individualized trust, and self-disclosure. Communication Research Reports, 15, 309–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362127(2011). “I have to love her, even if sometimes I may not like her”: The reasons why adults maintain their sibling relationships. North American Journal of Psychology, 13, 51–62.(2008). Emerging adult siblings' use of verbally aggressive messages as hurtful messages. Communication Quarterly, 56, 268–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370802240981, & (2006). Perceived sibling use of verbally aggressive messages across the lifespan. Communication Research Reports, 23, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17464090500535798, & (1998). Perceived sibling use of functional communication skills. Communication Research Reports, 15, 397–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362139, & (2001). Relational maintenance behaviors in the sibling relationship. Communication Quarterly, 49, 19–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385612, & Members of COM 200. (2004). Preliminary development of a measure of sibling relational maintenance behaviors: Scale development and initial findings. Communication Quarterly, 52, 334–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370204, & ([Page 243]2008). Interpersonal communication motives as a predictor of early and middle adulthood siblings' use of relational maintenance behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 25, 155–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824090802022028, , & (2011). Adult siblings' use of affectionate communication as strategic and routine relational maintenance behavior. Communication Research Reports, 28, 151–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565276, , , & (1999). Perceived sibling use of relational communication messages and sibling satisfaction, liking, and love. Communication Research Reports, 16, 339–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099909388735, , , , , , … (National Embryo Donation Center. (n.d.). Embryo donation. Retrieved from http://www.embryodonation.org/index.php?content=donation.National Opinion Research Center. (1998). General Social Survey, 1998 [data file]. Available from the GSS 1998 Codebook website, http://www.icpsr.umich.edu:8080/GSS/homepage.htm2000). The reasons why young children are placed for adoption: Findings from a recently placed sample and a discussion of implications for subsequent identity development. Child & Family Social Work, 5, 303–316. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2000.00172.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2000.00172.x(2003). Understanding other people's perspectives: Tasks for adopters in open adoption. Adoption & Fostering Journal, 6, 3–30.(2007). Coming to terms with the loss of a child: The feelings of birth parents and grandparents about adoption and post-adoption contact. Adoption Quarterly, 10, 1–23. doi: 10.1300/J145v10n01_01 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v10n01_01(1968). The changing American grandparent. In B. L.Neugarten (Ed.), Middle age and aging: A reader in social psychology (pp. 280–285). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press., & (2004). Code-switching in tri-generational family conversations among Chinese immigrants in New Zealand. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 28–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X03260807, & (2011). Aspirations and realities of love, marriage, and education among Hmong women. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 13, 201–215. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2011.626074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2011.626074, , & (1995). Learning conflict patterns in the family: Links between marital, parental, and sibling relationships. In T. J.Socha & G. H.Stamp (Eds.), Parents, children, and communication: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 273–298). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , , & (2012). Transition meanings? Family members' communicative struggles surrounding transgender identity. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 75–92. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2010.509283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2010.509283(2011). “Dear Birth Mother”: Addressing and meaning making in online adoption seeking. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 198–217. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2011.554751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2011.554751, & ([Page 244]2011). Savvy Auntie: The ultimate guide for cool aunts, great aunts, godmothers, and all women who love kids. New York, NY: HarperCollins.(1994). Shared stories of the grandparent-grandchild relationship. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 67–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/7WPK-LM6C-QCA4-GQ4R, & (2009). Communicating intimacy in older adulthood. Madrid, Spain: Editorial Aresta Publishers., , & (2002). Lifespan communication. In W. B.Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 26 (pp. 366–389). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , , & (2000). Mothers and daughters: Connection, empowerment, and transformation. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield., & (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication Research, 30, 599–624. doi: 10.1177/0093650203257841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650203257841, & (1997). Children's narrative representations of mothers: Their development and associations with child and mother adaptation. Child Development, 68, 127–138. doi: 10.2307/1131930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131930, , & (2006). Lesbian and bisexual women as grandparents: The centrality of sexual orientation in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. In D.Kimmel, T.Rose, & S.David (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender aging: Research and clinical perspectives (pp. 175–194). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.(2005). Decentering heteronormativity: A model for family studies. In V.Bengtson, A.Acock, K.Allen, P.Dilworth-Anderson, & D.Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 143–154). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172, , & (2010). Measuring community climate, Journal of GLBT Studies, 6, 214–228. doi:10.1080/15504281003709230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15504281003709230, , , & (2008). Structural and moral commitment among same-sex couples: Relationship duration, religiosity, and parental status. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 411–419. doi: 10.1037/0893-322.214.171.1241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3126.96.36.1991, , , & (2012). Adolescent perspectives on rules and resistance within the parent-child relationship. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27, 632–658. doi: 10.1177/0743558411435852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0743558411435852, & (1995). Ideology in interpersonal communication: Beyond the couches, talk shows, and bunkers. In B.Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 18 (pp. 480–497). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2008). Kin relationships and the caregiving biases of grandparents, aunts, and uncles. Human Nature, 19, 311–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9046-0, & (1989). Boundary ambiguity in remarriage: Does ambiguity differentiate degree of marital adjustment and integration?Family Relations, 38, 46–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/583609, & ([Page 245]2010). To be a parent: Issues in family formation among gay and lesbian adults. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 6, 326–340. doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2010.490902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2010.490902, & (2010). Gay fathers' pathway to fatherhood: International perspective. Journal of Family Research-Sonderheft, 101–116., & (2000). Birth marks: Transracial adoption in contemporary America. New York, NY: New York University Press.(2001). Mother-daughter discussions of caregiving prior to dependency: Exploring conflicts among European American women. Journal of Family Communication, 2, 133–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0102_03, & (2004). The family lives of lesbians and gay men. In A.Vangelisti (Ed.), The handbook of family communication (pp. 233–248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (2000). Adoption nation. New York, NY: Basic Books.(2012, May 17). Untangling the Web: How the Internet is reshaping search, reunion and adoption itself. [Webinar]. The Center for Adoption Support and Education.(2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany: State University of New York Press.(2006). Stay-at-home fathers: Masculinity, family, work, and gender stereotypes. Electronic Journal of Communication, 16. Retrieved from http://www.cios.org.remote.baruch.cuny.edu/EJCPUBLIC/016/3/01634.HTML#, & (1998). Multigenerational conflicts and new immigrants: An Indo-American experience. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 79, 410–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.703, & (1989). Mothers'-in-law and daughters'-in-law perceptions of interpersonal interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.(2007). Always an outlaw: Daughters-in-law on Australian family farms. Women's Studies International Forum, 30, 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.12.008(2003). Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 31–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02654075030201002(2011). Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: A meta-analytic comparison. Psychology and Aging, 26, 1–14. doi: 10.1037/a0021863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021863, & (1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E.Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development ((3rd ed., pp. 66–103). New York, NY: Wiley.1997). Loneliness and sibling relationships. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 103–112., & (2005). Uncertainty management and adoptees' ambiguous loss of their birth parents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 129–151. doi: 10.1177/0265407505049325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407505049325, & ([Page 246]2008). Intergenerational transmission of values: Family generativity and adolescents' narratives of parent and grandparent value teaching. Journal of Personality, 76, 171–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00483.x, , , & (2009). Income volatility and psychological depression. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 57–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9219-3, , & (2009). Relational dialectics among in-laws. Journal of Family Communication, 9, 67–89. doi 10.1080/15267430802561667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430802561667(Pryor, J. (Ed.). (2008). The international handbook of stepfamilies: Policy and practice in legal, research, and clinical environments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/97811182699231989). Young adult relationships: Siblings and friends. The Journal of Psychology, 123, 237–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1989.10542978(1990). Correlations between family environment and relationships of young adult siblings. Psychological Reports, 67, 1283–1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1283(2008). Father-daughter relationships: Examining family communication patterns and interpersonal communication satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 25, 23–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824090701831750(1988). Primary care giving fathers of long duration. In P.Bronstein & C. P.Cowan (Eds.), Fatherhood today: Men's changing role in the family (pp. 127–143). New York, NY: Wiley.(2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge: MIT Press., & (2000). Tracking online life: How women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project., , , , & (1992). Adoption and the family system. New York, NY: Guilford Press., & (1995). Cross-sectional and longitudinal examination of attachment, separation, individuation, and college student adjustment. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 463–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01781.x, , , & (1977). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York, NY: Bantam Books.(1986). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York, NY: Norton.(2009). Men do matter: Ethnographic insights on the socially supportive role of the African American uncles in the lives of inner-city African American male youth. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1041–1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08330930(2005). For better or for worse: Psycholegal soft spots and advance planning for same-sex couples. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 90–96. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.36.1.90 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.36.1.90, & (2010). Psychological distress, well-being, and legal recognition in same-sex couple relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 82–86. doi: 10.1037/a0017942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017942, , & ([Page 247]1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17, 523–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365090017004007, & (2012). Daughter-in-law standards for mother-in-law communication: Associations with daughter-in-law perceptions or relational satisfaction and shared family identity. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 93–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2010.537240(2009). Communicative and relational dimensions of shared family identity and relational intentions in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationships: Developing a conceptual model for mother-in-law/daughter-in-law research. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 67–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310802636334, & (2007). Commitment and emotional closeness in the sibling relationship. Southern Communication Journal, 72, 169–183. doi: 10.1080/10417940701316682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417940701316682, , & (2001). Grandfathers' perceptions and expectations of relationships with their adult grandchildren. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 407–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251301022004002, , & (1998). The relationship between willingness to communicate and solidarity with frequency, breadth, and depth of communication in the sibling relationship. Communication Research Reports, 15, 82–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362100, & (2010). Stay-at-home fathers' reasons for entering the role and stigma experiences: A preliminary report. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 279–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017774, , & (1986). “Aunt Sophie always said …” Oral histories of the commonplaces women learned about relating to men. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 342–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000276486029003006(2007). Moving beyond the controversy of the transracial adoption of black and biracial children. In R. A.Javier, A. L.Baden, F. A.Biafora, & A.Camacho-Gingerich (Eds.), Handbook of adoption (pp. 133–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publicationshttp://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976633(1985). Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 965–974. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352340(1982). Important variables in adult sibling relationships: A qualitative study. In M. E.Lamb & B.Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 225–249). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter., & (2007). Lagging far behind: Women in the Middle East. MERIA: The Middle East Review of International Affairs, 11, 1–7.(2007). Relationships with grandparents and the emotional well-being of late adolescent and young adult grandchildren. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 793–808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00537.x, & ([Page 248]1994). Age-based perceptions of conversational skills among younger and older adults. In M. L.Hummert, J. M.Wiemann, & J. F.Nussbaum (Eds.), Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 15–39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., , , & (1999). Knowledge of no return: Getting and giving information about genetic risk. Acta Ontologica, 38, 735–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/028418699432888(2004). Relating at a distance: Negotiating being together and being apart in long-distance relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 689–710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504046115(2005). The role of communication in same-sex friendships: A comparison among African Americans, Asian Americans, and European Americans. Communication Quarterly, 53, 265–283. doi: 10.1080/01463370500100982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370500100982, & (1997). Ethnicity and emotional support in same-sex friendship: A comparison of Asian-Americans, African-Americans, and Euro-Americans. Personal Relationships, 4, 413–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00154.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00154.x, , , & (2004). Narrated relationships: Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law justifying conflicts in Taiwan's Chhan-chng. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3), 365–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_4(2010). Narrative relationships: Mothers-in-law and daughter-in-law justifying conflicts in Taiwan's Chhan-chng. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 365–398. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_4(2010). Partnering across the life course: Sex, relationships, and mate selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 557–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00718.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00718.x(2008). Sex differences in stepchildren's reports of stepfamily functioning. Communication Reports, 21, 46–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934210802019462(2010). Coparental communication with nonresidential parents as a predictor of couples' relational satisfaction and mental health in stepfamilies. Western Journal of Communication, 74, 484–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2010.512282(2011). Stepparents' and nonresidential parents' relational satisfaction as a function of coparental communication in stepfamilies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 983–1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407510397990(2007). Communication processes that predict young adults' feelings of being caught and their associations with mental health and family satisfaction. Communication Monographs, 74, 200–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750701390085, & (2010). Dark clouds with silver linings: The (dys) functional ambivalence of stepfamily relationships. In W. R.Cupach & B. H.Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships II (pp. 243–268). New York, NY: Routledge., & (2007). An examination of everyday talk in stepfamily systems. Western Journal of Communication, 71, 216–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310701510077, , , , , , & ([Page 249]2011). Coparental communication, relational satisfaction, and mental health in stepfamilies. Personal Relationships, 18, 352–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01295.x, & (2007). Communication processes that mediate family communication patterns and mental well-being: A mean and covariance structures analysis of young adults from divorced and non-divorced families. Human Communication Research, 33, 330–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00302.x, & (2012). Parental confirmation as a mitigator of feeling caught and family satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 19, 146–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01345.x, & (2006). The divorce decree, communication, and the structuration of co-parenting relationships in stepfamilies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 741–759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407506068261, , , , & (2011). Ex-spouses' relational satisfaction as a function of coparental communication in stepfamilies. Communication Studies, 62, 272–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.563453, , & (2008). A social relations model of everyday talk and relational satisfaction in stepfamilies. Communication Monographs, 75, 190–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750802023163, , & (1983). Siblings and other kin. In T. H.Brubaker (Ed.), Family relationships in later life (pp. 47–62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(2011). Reunited twins: Spouse relations/twin research reports/timely topics. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 14, 290–294. doi: 10.1375/twin.14.3.290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/twin.14.3.290(2005). Family communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (2008, April). Place making and identity formation in transnational and transracial adoption. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Boston, MA.(1991). Former in-laws as a source of support. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 17, 67–90., , & (2009). Legal and social contexts and mental health among lesbian and heterosexual mothers. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 255–262. doi: 10.1037/a0014973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014973, , & (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of family communication patterns and conflict between young adults and parents. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 186–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430802182456, & (2002). Efforts to create meaning in the relationship between aging mothers and their caregiving daughters: A qualitative study of caregiving. Journal of Aging Studies, 13, 161–177. doi: 10.1016/S0890-4065(99)80049-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065%2899%2980049-8, & (2012). Examining the long-distance relationship between left-behind children and their migrant parents in China: An attachment and relational maintenance perspective. Unpublished manuscript, School of Communication Studies, Kent State University, Kent, OH.(2012). Openness in adoption: From secrecy and stigma to knowledge and connections. New York, NY: Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute., & ([Page 250]2001). Handling the discontinuous aspects of continuous social relationships: Toward research on the persistence of social forms. Communication Theory, 1, 106–127.(1990). The problem with in-laws. Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 399–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j..1992.00469.x(1999). The impact of acculturation in Mexican American families on the quality of adult grandparent-grandchild relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 188–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353893, & (2000). In their own voices: Transracial adoptees tell their stories. New York, NY: Columbia University Press., & (2000). Adoption across borders. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers., & (2011). The role of communicative openness in information seeking among adoptees from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 181–197. doi: 10.1080/15267431003656587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431003656587, , , & (1998). “Men don't do this sort of thing”: A case study of the social isolation of househusbands. Men & Masculinities, 1, 138–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1097184X98001002002(2010). Custodial grandmother-grandfather dyads: Pathways among marital distress, grandparent dysphoria, parenting practice, and grandchild adjustment. Family Relations, 59, 45–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00585.x, & (2009). The daddy shift: How stay-at-home dads, breadwinning moms, and shared parenting are transforming the American family. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.(1987). Inheritance of wealth as human kin investment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 171–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095%2887%2990042-2, , & (Socha, T. J., & Stamp, G. H. (Eds.). (1995). Parents, children and communication: Frontiers of theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.2010). Families communicating with children (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press., & (2004). Children's mental health in times of economic recession: Replication and extension of the Family Economic Stress Model in Finland. Developmental Psychology, 40, 412–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.522, , & (2007). Communicative predictors of a shared family identify: Comparison of grandchildren's perceptions of family-of-origin grandparents and step-grandparents. Journal of Family Communication, 7, 177–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430701221636(2008). Intergenerational support and the role of grandparents in post-divorce families: Retrospective accounts of young adult grandchildren. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 9, 72–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17459430802400373(2006). Shared family identity, age salience, and intergroup contact: Investigation of the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Communication Monographs, 73, 87–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750500534388, & (2004). Pioneers in partnership: Lesbian and gay male couples in civil unions compared with those not in civil unions and married heterosexual siblings. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 275–286. doi: 10.1037/0893-3184.108.40.2065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3220.127.116.115, , & ([Page 251]2012). Husbands' conflict styles in Chinese mother/daughter-in-law conflicts: Daughters-in-law's perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 57–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2011.629968, & (2007). Rearticulating the aunt: Feminist alternatives of family, care, kinship, and agency in popular aunt figures. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 7, 442–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532708607304538, & (2013). Where the aunts are: Family, feminism, and kinship in popular culture. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.& (2003). Qualitative research on adolescent pregnancy: A descriptive review and analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 18, 397–408. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(03)00160-x http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0882-5963%2803%2900160-X, & (2006). Gender differences in adult sibling relations in two-child families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 977–992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00308.x, & (1994). Adult children's divorce and intergenerational relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 279–293. doi: 10.2307/353100 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353100, , , & (1998). Gay and lesbian families are here; All our families are queer; Let's get used to it! In S.Coontz, M.Parson, & G.Raley (Eds.), American families: A multicultural reader (pp. 372–405). London, England: Routledge.(1974). All our kin. New York, NY: Basic Books.(1998). Kinscripts. In K. V.Hansen & A. I.Garey (Eds.), Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 405–415). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press., & (2013). Twenty years of family research published in communication journals: A review of the perspectives, theories, concepts, and contexts. In A.Vangelisti (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of family communication (, & (2nd ed., pp. 11–28). New York, NY: Routledge.2007). Brave new stepfamilies: Diverse paths toward stepfamily living. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1992). The nature and family correlates of preadolescents' perceptions of their sibling relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 9, 179–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407592092002, & (2005). Black sheep and kissing cousins: How our family stories shape us. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.(2000). Kinship and gender: An introduction ((2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.2010, September). What's the new status symbol for alpha women? A stay at home husband. Marie Claire, 148; 150; 152.(1999). Grandparents in the United States and the Republic of China: A comparison of generations and cultures. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 49, 279–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/DQFF-LVRU-U6W9-8Q6L, , , , , , & (Sturgis, I. (Ed.). (2004). Aunties: Thirty-five writers celebrate their other mother. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.1985). Discriminators of mutual helping behavior among older adults and their siblings. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 4, 63–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073346488500400208([Page 252]2004). Changing gender practices within the household. Gender & Society, 18, 207–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243203261571(1962). Kin family network: Unheralded structure in current conceptualizations of family functioning. Marriage and Family Living, 24, 231–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/349136, & (2008). Discursive negotiation of family identity: A study of U.S. families with adopted children from China. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 126–147. doi: 10.1080/15267430701857406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430701857406(2012). Negotiating identity and pragmatism: Parental treatment of international adoptees' birth culture names. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 209–226. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2012.686940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2012.686940(2009). “How much did you pay for her?”: Decision-making criteria underlying adoptive parents' responses to inappropriate remarks. Journal of Family Communication, 9, 107–125. doi: 10.1080/15267430902773253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15267430902773253, & (2007). Negotiating heteronormativity dialectically: Lesbian couples' display of symbols in culture. Western Journal of Communication, 71, 177–195. doi: 10.1080/10570310701518443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310701518443, & (2008). Negotiating lesbian family identity via symbols and rituals. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 26–47. doi: 0.1177/0192513X07305752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07305752, , & (2012a, January 23). With DNA testing, suddenly they are family. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/us/with-dna-testing.(2012b, August 9). Male couples face pressures to fill cradles. New York Times. Retrieved: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/10/us/gay-couples-face-pressure-to-have-children.html?pagewanted=all&_moc.semityn.www(2010). Remarriage and stepfamilies: Strategic sites for family scholarship in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 667–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00724.x(1998). Handbook on grandparenthood. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S.Worchel & W.Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall., & (2006). Intergroup contact and grandparent-grandchild communication: The effects of self-disclosure on implicit and explicit biases against older people. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 413–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430206064642, , , , & (2010). Perceptions of parental gender roles and conflict styles and their association with young adults' relational and psychological well-being. Communication Research Reports, 27, 230–242. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2010.496326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2010.496326, & (2010). Mechanisms linking early life stress to adult health outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107, 8507–8512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003890107([Page 253]2008). The demography of stepfamilies in the United States. In J.Pryor (Ed.), The international handbook of stepfamilies: Policy and practice in legal, research, and clinical environments (pp. 3–29). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley., & (2000). The changing demography of America's families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1234–1246. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01234.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01234.x, , & (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley., & (1986). Age and sex differences in perceptions of grandparenting. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 417–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/41.3.417(1996). The mutual influence of family support and youth adaptation. In G. R.Pierce, B. R.Sarason, & I. G.Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 289–310). New York, NY: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1388-3_13, & (2000). Family ties and the discontinuity of divorce in Black and White newlywed couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 349–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00349.x, & (2009). Divorce attitudes around the world: Distinguishing the impact of culture on evaluations and attitude structure. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 280–297. doi: 10.1177/1069397109336648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069397109336648, & (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men's lives. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.(2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.(1998). Aunties: Our older, cooler, wiser friends. Berkeley, CA: Wildcat Canyon Press., & (2004). Kinkeeping and caregiving: Contributions of older people in immigrant families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35, 105–122., & (2002). The influence of relational context on support processes: Points of difference and similarity between young adult sons and daughters in problem talk with mothers. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 703–722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407502195009(1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.(1975). Early and middle adulthood. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.(1985). Early and middle adulthood. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.(2004, December 2). Woody Guthrie's Jewish legacy. The Jerusalem Post, p. 24.(2006). Understudied relationships in family communication research: Expanding the social recipe. In K.Floyd & M. T.Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 193–206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204369, & (2008). Childhood parental loss and adult hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function. Biological Psychiatry, 63, 1147–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.01.011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.01.011, , , , , , & ([Page 254]U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Majority of children life with two biological parents. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/children/cb08-30.htmlU.S. Census Bureau. (2010a). Households and families: 2010 (2010 Census Briefs: C2010BR-14). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-14.pdfU.S. Census Bureau. (2010b). SHP-1. Parents and children in stay-at-home parent family groups: 1994 to present. Current Population Survey, March and Annual Social and Economic Supplements.U.S. Census Bureau. (2010c). Supplemental fertility tables. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/fertility/data/cps/supplemental.htmlU.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Living arrangements of children: 2009. Available online from http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-126.pdfU.S. Census Data. (2010). Population. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/population.htmlU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012). The AFCARS Report No. 19. Retrieved from http://www.act.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/U.S. National Health Information Survey. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm1998). Grandparenthood over time: Historical and demographic trends. In M. E.Szinovacz (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 23–39). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press., & (1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: Psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 664–674. doi: 10.2307/353252 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353252(2008). Mother-daughter communication about sex and sexual intercourse among middle- to upper-class African American girls. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 901–917. doi: 10.1177/0192513X07311951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07311951, , & (2004). Mothers in two types of lesbian families: Stigma experiences, supports, and burdens. Journal of Family Nursing, 10, 450–484. doi: 10.1177/1074840704270120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1074840704270120(2011). Same-sex relationships and dissolution: The connection between heteronormativity and homonormativity. Family Relations, 60, 562–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00669.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00669.x, , , & (2012). Quality of life of adolescents raised from birth by lesbian mothers: The U.S. National Longitudinal Family Study. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 33, 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e31823b62af, , , , & (2012). Stigmatization associated with growing up in a lesbian-parented family: What do adolescents experience and how do they deal with it?Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 999–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.048, , , , & ([Page 255]2002). Domesticating patriarchy: Hegemonic masculinity and television's “Mr. Mom.”Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 352–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180216564(2011). Contact in adoption and adoptive identity formation: The mediating role of family conversation. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 393–401. doi: 10.1037/a0023388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023388, & (2008). Intergenerational solidarity and support between adult siblings. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 157–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00468.x, & , (2007). Support between siblings and between friends: Two worlds apart?Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1271–1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00446.x, & (2005). Becoming “point and click” parents: A case study of communication and online adoption. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 279–294. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0504_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0504_3, , & (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York, NY: Broadway Books., & (1992). Keeping in touch: How women in mid-life allocate social contacts among kith and kin. Social Forces, 70, 637–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/70.3.637, & (2011). Exploring the theory of convergence communication: Broadening the scope of an interpersonal theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA., & (2007). Conceptualizing breadwinning work. Work, Employment & Society, 21, 317–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0950017007076642(2010). Caught in the middle: Mothers in stepfamilies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 305–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407510361729, & (1998). Adoption and kinship. In K. V.Hansen & A. I.Garey (Eds.), Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 41–51). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.(1998). The place of kinfolk in personal community networks. In K. V.Hansen & A. I.Garey (Eds.), Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 231–239). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.(1989). Brother's keepers: Situating kinship relations in broader networks of social support. Sociological Perspectives, 32, 273–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407586032005, & (2011). Making room for daddies: Male couples creating families through adoption. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 7, 155–181. doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2011.537242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2011.537242(2001). Differences over time in older people's relationships with children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews in rural North Wales. Ageing and Society, 21, 567–590., & (1994). Temporal qualities of relationships Organismic, transactional, and dialectical views. In M. L.Knapp & G. R.Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (, & (2nd ed., pp. 323–379). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage1993). Family relationship history, contemporary parent grandparent relationship quality, and the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 1025–1035. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352782, , & ([Page 256]1992a). Ties among adult siblings. Social Forces, 71, 85–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/71.1.85, & (1992b). When the Brady bunch grows up: Step/half-and full sibling relations in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 197–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353287, & (2012, August 12). Just wait until your mother gets home. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/fashion/dads-are-taking-over-as-full-time-parents.html?pagewanted=all(1996). Intergenerational conversations: Young adults' retrospective accounts. Human Communication Research, 23, 220–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00393.x, & (2001). Intergenerational communication across the lifespan. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1998). Grandparenthood among Hispanics. In M. E.Szinovacz (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 87–96). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press., & (2010). Comparison of physically abused, neglected, and non-maltreated children's interactions with their parents: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Communication Monographs, 77, 540–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.502535, , , & (2000). Sharing the culture: Adult grandchildren's perceptions of intergenerational relations. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 51, 199–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/0UY5-MXXP-W81K-VXCU, & (1993). Growing up responsible. Educational Leadership, 51, 40–43.(2006). The contribution of specific causes of death to sex differences in mortality. Public Health Reports, 121, 746., , , , , , & (2002). “What's a family, anyway?” In J.Stewart (Ed.), Bridges not walls: A book about interpersonal communication (pp. 375–383). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.(2011). “My grandchild has a disability”: Impact on grandparenting identity, roles and relationships. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 355–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.01.002, , & (2004). Evolutionary psychology: An introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164757, & (2000a). The communication of social support within an on-line community for older adults: A qualitative analysis of the SeniorNet community. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 1, 33–43.(2000b). Computer-mediated social support, older adults, and coping. Journal of Communication, 50, 100–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02855.x(1996). Open adoption and the level of child participation. Child Development, 67, 2358–2374. doi: 10.2307/1131628 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131628, , , , & (2003). The Family Adoption Communication (FAC) Model: Identifying pathways of [Page 257]adoption-related communication. Adoption Quarterly, 7, 53–84. doi: 10.1300/J145v07n02_04 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v07n02_04, , , & (2011). Life satisfaction among rural Chinese grandparents: The role of intergenerational family relationship and support exchange with grandchildren. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 148–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00809.x, & (2003). What it takes to be a grandparent in a new country: The lived experience and emotional well-being of Australian-Vietnamese grandparents. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38, 209–228., & (2000). Vietnamese-Australian grandparenthood: The changing roles and psychological well-being. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 15, 265–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006777003250, & (2006). Grandparents, adolescents, and parents: Intergenerational relations of Taiwanese youth. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1042–1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06288119, , , & (2006). Getting along with the in-laws: Relationships with siblings-in-law. In K.Floyd & M. T.Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 117–127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204369(2010). The experience and communication of envy among siblings, siblings-in-law, and spouses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 1075–1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407510382244(2011). The experience and communication of envy among siblings, siblings-in-law, and spouses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 1075–1088. doi: 10.1177/0265407510382244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407510382244(2012). Older adults and media use. Retrieved September 21, 2012, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Older-adults-and-internet-use.aspx, & ([Page 258]