Widening the Family Circle: New Research on Family Communication
Publication Year: 2006
Widening the Family Circle: New Research on Family Communication bridges the significant gap in family communication literature by providing a thorough examination of lesser-studied family relationships, such as those involving grandparents, in-laws, cousins, stepfamilies, and adoptive parents. In this engaging text, editors Kory Floyd and Mark T. Morman bring together a diverse collection of empirical studies, theoretic essays, and critical reviews of literature on communication to constitute a stronger, more complete understanding of communication within the family.
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
- Chapter 1: Communication over the Life Span: The Mother-Adult Daughter Relationship
- Communication and Connection: In Mother-Adult Daughter Relationships
- Unique Patterns of Communicating
- Turning Points
- Chapter 2: Communication among Peers: Adult Sibling Relationships
- Unique Characteristics of the Sibling Relationship
- Different Types of Sibling Relationships
- Communication in Adult Sibling Relationships
- Communication Behaviors among Adult Siblings
- Learning More about Adult Siblings
- Chapter 3: The Good Son: Men's Perceptions of the Characteristics of Sonhood
- The Role of Son
- The Good Son Study
- Commentary on Part A
- Chapter 4: Friends and Allies: Communication in Grandparent-Grandchild Relationships
- The Lack of Attention to Grandparental Relationships
- Communicative Opportunities and Challenges
- What Do We Know about Grandparent-Grandchild Communication?
- What's Left to Learn about the Grandparent-Grandchild Relationship?
- Chapter 5: The “Other” Women in Family Life: Aunt/Niece/Nephew Communication
- The Title of “Aunt”
- Aunting in Family Communication Research
- Themes and Schemas of Aunting Relationships
- Descriptions and Dialectics of Aunting Relationships
- Communicative Strengths and Challenges
- What is Left to Learn about Aunting?
- Chapter 6: Getting along with the In-Laws: Relationships with Parents-In-Law
- Defining the Relationship with Parents-In-Law
- The Nonvoluntary, Triadic Structure of the Parent-In-Law/Child-In-Law Relationship
- Interaction between Parents-In-Law and Children-In-Law
- Chapter 7: Getting along with the In-Laws: Relationships with Siblings-In-Law
- What is a Sibling-In-Law?
- What is Known about Communication among Siblings-In-Law
- Contemporary Research on Siblings-In-Law
- Commentary on Part B
- Chapter 8: Joined by Hearts and Words: Adoptive Family Relationships
- How Common is Adoption?
- Background of Adoption Practices
- Contemporary Adoption Practices
- Why is Adoption Historically Understudied?
- Communicative Challenges of the Adoptive Family
- What We Need to Learn about Adoption
- Chapter 9: Understudied and Misunderstood: Communication in Stepfamily Relationships
- Stepfamily Development and Types
- Communication and Stepfamily Boundaries
- Chapter 10: Investigating Privacy Boundaries: Communication in Post-Divorce Families
- The Role of Privacy Boundaries in Post-Divorce Family Relationships
- Redefining the Boundaries with One's Former Spouse
- Redefining the Boundaries with One's Children
- The Privacy Dilemmas of Interparental Conflict and Children's Feelings of being Caught
- Commentary on Part C
- Chapter 11: Understudied Relationships in Family Communication Research: Expanding the Social Recipe
- Dialectic Tensions
- Methods for Dealing with Dialectic Tensions
To our families, both immediate and extended. Thank you for teaching us first about the power of family relationships.
Copyright © 2006 by Sage Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Sage Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
Sage Publications Ltd.
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
B-42, Panchsheel Enclave
Post Box 4109
New Delhi 110 017 India
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Widening the family circle: New research on family communication/edited by Kory Floyd, Mark T. Morman.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-4129-0921-X (cloth)
ISBN 1-4129-0922-8 (pbk.)
1. Communication in the family. 2. Interpersonal communication. I. Floyd, Kory. II. Morman, Mark T.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
05 06 07 08 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Acquisitions Editor: Todd R. Armstrong
Editorial Assistant: Deya Sayoud
Production Editor: Denise Santoyo
Typesetter: C'M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Cover Designer: Janet Foulger
Like many significant projects, a book is a journey. It has its genesis in an idea, and it navigates a path along which it requires many forms of help from many different people in order to arrive safely at its destination. It is our pleasure now to thank those who helped this book traverse that path.
The impetus for this volume was our observation that although families are diverse, dynamic structures that encompass a broad range of relationships, the discipline of family communication has focused a large proportion of its research on only two: marriage and parent-young child relationships. There can be little argument that these relationships merit in-depth attention, but we believed that the discipline's understanding of the family would be greatly enhanced by “widening the circle” to include other relationships, such as those with grandparents, adoptive parents, in-laws, aunts and uncles, siblings, and stepparents.
We first engaged this idea in a graduate seminar that we taught together at Arizona State University during the spring of 2002. We called the seminar Communication in Under-Studied Family Relationships, and we used it as an opportunity to delve into the literatures of familial relationships other than those between spouses or parents and young children. We were encouraged by the quality of research we found on many of these relationships and we came to believe more strongly that a volume in which much of this literature was brought together would be of use to the field. The graduate students who participated in our seminar offered insightful questions and criticisms about this literature that helped greatly to sharpen our focus for this book, and we are grateful to each of them for their contributions.
Following completion of our seminar, we began to ask our colleagues in the family communication area to contribute their work on family relationships to the book. Many of the contributors we asked were well known to us beforehand, and some we had the pleasure of meeting as a result of this project. We are so pleased to include in this volume the work of such a [Page x]fine and diverse set of scholars, and we thank each of them for being willing to share their work with us.
Of course, no book sees the light of day without the involvement of a skilled editor, and we are profoundly grateful to Todd Armstrong for his willingness to take our vision, refine it, improve on it, and bring it to fruition. Todd, and his assistant, Deya Saoud, have supported this project in every manner possible, and we thank them both for their commitment and encouragement.
In addition, the contributions of the following reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.
University of Kentucky
Nancy J. Eckstein
University of Missouri-Columbia
Pennsylvania State University
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
University of Arizona
Lynn H. Turner
Amber M. Walker
Pennsylvania State University
Introduction: On the Breadth of the Family Experience[Page xi]
The family is one of nature's masterpieces.—George Santayana (1863–1952)
To call the family an important human institution is to understate its value profoundly. Virtually no other relationship engages us socially, genetically, legally, financially, and intimately with the pervasiveness of the family. Families are with us from beginning to end; we are born into familial relationships and we often leave this life with family members at our side. Families protect us, provide for us, and give us an identity and a sense of belonging. They engage the full spectrum of our emotions, from immeasurable joys to our deepest sorrows, and they enjoy a level of permanence unparalleled by almost anything else in our lives. Indeed, one could easily argue that the family is situated at the focal point of nearly all relational encounters. It is, truly, a masterpiece of the human experience.
Among the family's many unique attributes is its breadth across the relational landscape. From the nuclear reproductive and parental relationships, the family branches off in nearly innumerable ways to encompass other forms of familial ties. Some relationships, such as grandparents or nieces and nephews, are vertical ties, meaning that they span two or more generations. Others, such as siblings or cousins, are horizontal ties, meaning they represent contemporaries within one's own generation. Many family relationships are genetically bound, however distantly (e.g., aunts and uncles, great-grandparents, second cousins). Others are formed through legal means, such as adoption [Page xii](e.g., adoptive siblings), marriage (e.g., parents-in-law), remarriage (e.g., stepfamilies), or divorce (e.g., post-Divorce relationships). Still others are formed and maintained purely through social interaction; these fall under the category of “fictive kin,” or family-like relationships that are neither genetically nor legally bound (e.g., godparents, neighbors, or longtime friends who are considered “family”).
As suggested by the metaphor of the tree—often used to explicate family relationships—families exist in both nuclear and greatly extended forms. Any given person is linked, in some form or another, to every person on every other limb, branch, and stem of his or her own tree. Certainly, many of these relationships may seem at times to be socially inconsequential, particularly if they involve relatives who are distant genetically, geographically, or both. There is relevance in these relationships, however, that often goes unacknowledged by family communication scholars but is nonetheless operative. For example, genetic relatives (both within and outside the nuclear family) are often the first to be turned to for emotional or economic support during times of crisis, sometimes being preferred even over close friends (see Burnstein, Crandall, & Kitayama, 1994; Essock-Vitale & McGuire, 1985). Similarly, it is almost always genetic relatives to whom assets are allocated in wills, and in some cultures, nieces and nephews are preferred over children in the allocation of property (Smith, Kish, & Crawford, 1987). People are even likely to communicate regularly with nonnuclear family members through mechanisms such as e-mail (Braithwaite, McBride, & Schrodt, 2003) or holiday cards (Fingerman & Griffiths, 1999).What We Know and Don't Know about: Communication in Family Relationships
Despite their relevance, family relationships other than marriage and parent-child relationships have gone largely unscrutinized in research by many scholars in the fields of family communication, family psychology, and personal relationships. In a content analysis of nearly a thousand research articles published in family and personal relationships journals from 1994 to 1999, family scholars Karen Fingerman and Elizabeth Hay (2002) reported that parental and spousal/romantic relationships were by far the most common topics of the research. Specifically, 16.6% of the articles focused on relationships with parents, and 25.6% focused on relationships with young children. Moreover, roughly a quarter (25.2%) focused on romantic ties, and more than four in ten (44.3%) focused specifically on marriage.1
[Page xiii]In sharp contrast, many other family relationships received almost no scholarly attention at all. Relationships with aunts and uncles, siblings-in-law, cousins, and great-grandchildren, for instance, were the focus of only 0.1% of the research surveyed. Even siblings, a component of the nuclear family, were studied in only 4.1% of the research. Stepfamilies, grandparents, and parent-in-law relationships were similarly infrequently studied. It appears, then, that relative to marriage and parent-child relationships, all other family relationships can reasonably be described as “understudied.”
That marital and parental relationships should so frequently be the focus of academic research is entirely understandable, given their importance in the human social agenda. The marital bond is perhaps the principal and most socially significant of all human attachments. It engages people in nearly every dimension of their lives, including physically, economically, legally, sexually, emotionally, reproductively, in terms of their individual identity, and in terms of their social and personal networks. Married people live longer, happier, and healthier lives than never-married people (Lillard & Waite, 1995; Pinquart, 2003), and the termination of marriage, either through divorce (Kiecolt-Glaser, Kennedy, Malkoff, Fisher, Speicher, & Glaser, 1988) or bereavement (Irwin, Daniels, Smith, Bloom, & Weiner, 1987), brings with it pronounced declines in physical well-being. Indeed, data from national surveys indicate that being happy with one's marriage is far more important to one's ratings of overall happiness than anything else, including satisfaction with careers or friendships (Glenn & Weaver, 1981).
Undoubtedly, many of the same points could be made with respect to the parent-child relationship (at least, to the relationship between parents and young children). Evolutionary psychology suggests that humans (and all sexually reproducing species) have evolved through the pressures of natural selection to give primacy to the health and well-being of their offspring, and that this creates ingrained motivations to love, protect, and provide for one's children more than for nearly anyone else in one's social circle (see, e.g., Workman & Reader, 2004). These motivations manifest themselves in the innumerable ways that parents invest in their children's well-being. One such way is reflected in the considerable economic resources parents willingly provide their children. Indeed, in its most recent annual report on the Expenditures on Children by Families, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion estimates the cost of raising a single child to age 18 to be as much as $261,270 (Lino, 2005). This figure includes the major child-rearing expenses of housing, food, transportation, clothing, education, child care, and health care, as well as miscellaneous expenses such as entertainment or personal care. The importance of the [Page xiv]parent-child bond is also reflected in the magnitude of grief that parents typically experience at the premature loss of a child. Researchers have known for decades that the death of a child is among the most potent of all psychological stressors (Holmes & Rahe, 1967). Indeed, contemporary research indicates that losing a child is associated with pronounced increases in parental Post-traumatic stress disorder (Murphy, Johnson, Chung, & Beaton, 2003) and parental morality (Li, Precht, Mortensen, & Olsen, 2003).
However important marital and parental relationships are to the human social agenda, though, they represent only a narrow slice of the family experience. As we noted above, familial relationships beyond marital and parental bonds have been relatively neglected by scholars in the family and personal relationships fields. One of the principal problems with this imbalance in academic attention is that it belies people's actual familial experiences. After content-analyzing the family and personal relationships journals to quantify the amount of focus on each family relationship, Fingerman and Hay (2002) surveyed a sample of adults consisting of relationship scholars, those with advanced degrees in other fields, and those with less education. They asked participants to indicate which family relationships they considered applicable to themselves and then to rate their importance. Although spousal and parent-child relationships were understandably rated highly on both counts, other relationships were also considered highly applicable, including cousins (95%), aunts or uncles (92%), nieces or nephews (85%), siblings-in-law (80%), siblings (75%), parents-in-law (63%), and grandparents (50%).2 Moreover, participants rated all of these relationships, with the exception of cousins, above the midpoint of the scale for importance.
These findings merely quantify what we suspect many people would say on their own: although spousal and parental relationships are extremely important, they are only two among myriad relationships that make up the experience of family. Indeed, many other relationships engage people in ways that spouses, parents, and children do not. Siblings, for instance, are usually our most longstanding life companions; we typically enter sibling relationships early in life and, barring premature death, they are the people at the end of our lives whom we have known the longest. Moreover, grandparents or aunts and uncles can serve as important allies and confidantes in ways that parents may not. Cousins may serve as surrogate siblings and may be particularly instrumental in the lives of only children. Adoption opens the door to parenthood for those who choose not to reproduce biologically or who are unable to. Still other relationships are notable because they can be tremendously supportive, yet are often the sources of pronounced stress, such as stepfamilies or parents-in-law. Indeed, the diversity of the familial experience is great, and a focus on marital and [Page xv]parental relationships—critical though they are—prevents us from appreciating the rich tapestry that is a family.Widening the Circle of Family Communication
This book represents a coming together of contemporary research on many of these lesser-studied family relationships. The focus of the research covered herein is relational communication, broadly construed to include various patterns of meaning-making. Each chapter details one understudied relationship and offers either a critical review of existing literature, a presentation of original data pertaining to communication in that relationship, or both. The goal of each chapter is to illuminate why the focal relationship is consequential and to describe its important communicative attributes.
Our mission with this collection is two-fold. An immediate objective is to offer a resource for students and scholars of family interaction to learn of the research done on relationships outside the nuclear reproductive and parental unions. Such a view certainly is not intended to replace a focus on marital and parent-child relationships but rather to augment it, allowing students and scholars a broader appreciation of existing knowledge about family communication. Our longer-term objective with this contributed volume is to encourage the additional exploration of communication in these and other family relationships. We believe this will become ever-increasingly important as the continued evolution of the family within the human social experience makes previously unusual familial relationships more mundane.
We have divided the book into three sections, the first of which addresses relationships rooted in the family of origin. This section begins with a chapter on the mother-daughter relationship, which, although it is a parental relationship, is relatively understudied in its adult form (i.e., when the daughters are adults, as opposed to children). The second chapter focuses on the adult sibling relationship, which is understudied in general and is particularly so among young and middle adult siblings. The final chapter in the first section addresses the meaning of “sonhood,” or the relationship men have with their parents.
Whereas the chapters in the first section address relationships that are more often studied in other forms (e.g., parent-child relationships with young children), those in the second section address relationships that are beyond the nuclear family configuration. Addressed in this section are the grandparent-grandchild relationship, the relationship of aunts with their nieces and nephews, the parent-in-law/child-in-law relationship, and the relationship of siblings-in-law. These topics represent a mixture of vertical [Page xvi]and horizontal ties and a blend of genetic and legally bound relationships. The final section focuses on relationships that are formed through the processes of divorce, remarriage, and adoption. Considered first in this section are the relationships of parents with their adopted children. Next discussed are post-divorce relationships. Finally, stepfamily relationships (which include parent-stepchild as well as other step-relationships) are addressed.
Concluding each of these sections is a commentary by one of three distinguished family communication scholars: Anita Vangelisti, Fran Dickson, and Beth Le Poire. Each commentary reflects on the themes and information addressed in the chapters in that section and identifies important areas of inquiry for future research. Similarly, this volume concludes with a summary and extension provided by family communication scholars Lynn Turner and Richard West, who use the research explicated herein as a starting point to describe what the field of family communication knows—and what it has yet to learn—about communication in family relationships.
To be certain, not all lesser-studied family relationships are addressed in the chapters herein. One evident challenge in offering a collection such as this is that because the focus is on a wide variety of family relationships, many relationships that were potential topics simply had received too little academic attention to facilitate their inclusion in this book. Despite this limitation, we believe there is much to be learned about the family—and about family communication—by broadening our perspective to include relationships outside of those traditionally studied by family scholars. We hope this collection will illuminate the dynamics of family relationships and will provoke scholars toward their continued exploration.Notes
1. The percentages sum to greater than 100 because some studies focused on more than one type of relationship.
2. Percentages for siblings, parents-in-law, and grandparents are averaged between the two sexes. For example, Fingerman and Hay asked separately about grandmothers (48%) and grandfathers (52%); we averaged these to report a 50% figure for grandparents.
References[Page 207][Page 244]1968). Kinship in an urban setting. Chicago: Markham.(1996, June 17). Building a better dad. Newsweek, 58–64.(1989). Attitudes toward mother-in-law and stepmother: A cross-cultural study. Psychological Reports, 65, 1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3f.1194, , & (2001). Older adults and computers: Report of a national survey. Retrieved June 9, 2003, from http://www.seniornet.org/php/default.php?PageID=5476(Adoption Learning Partners. (2004). Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://www.adoptionlearningpartners.org2003). “Feeling caught” in stepfamilies: Managing boundary turbulence through appropriate privacy coordination rules. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 729–756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407503206002(Communication processes that promote risk and resilience in postdivorce families. In M.Fine and J.Harvey (Eds.), The handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (in press).2005a). A context-specific examination of communal coping in postdivorce families. Manuscript submitted for publication., , & (2005b). Communicative ways of coping: Variations in communal, social, and individual coping and resilience in postdivorce families. Manuscript submitted for publication., , & (2004). A risk and resiliency model of ambiguous loss in postdivorce stepfamilies. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 65–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0402_1, & (Family career theories: Family stress and adaptation across the lifespan. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication. Multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420, & (in press).2003a). Adolescents’ and young adults’ feelings of being caught between their parents in divorced and nondivorced households. Communication Monographs, 70, 142–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000133791, & (2003b). “Feeling caught” as a mediator of adolescents’ and young adults’ avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and nondivorced households. Communication Monographs, 70, 142–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000133791, & ([Page 208]2003c). Uncertainty and the avoidance of the state of one's family/relationships in stepfamilies, postdivorce single parent families, and first marriage families. Human Communication Research, 29, 516–533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00854.x, & (2000). Motivations underlying topic avoidance in close relationships. In S.Petronio (Ed)., Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 165–180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (2003). Parent-child role reversal: Development of a measure and test of an attachment theory model. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 22, 31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.126.96.36.19949(1977). Sibling solidarity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 177–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351073(2000). Families in the middle and later years: A review and critique of research in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 911–926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00911.x, , & (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.(1992). A transactional approach to close relationships: Courtship, weddings, and placemaking. In W. B.Walsh, K. H.Craik, & R. H.Price (Eds.), Person-environment psychology: Models and perspectives (pp. 193–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , , & (1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 628–640. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353723(2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269–1287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x(2005). Adult children's feelings of being caught between their parents in divorced and nondivorced families: Consequences for parent-child relations and children's well-being. Manuscript submitted for publication., & (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills or commitment to marriage?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1038–1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01038.x, & (1994). Contact with nonresident parents, interparental conflict, and children's behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 191–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X94015002003, & (Age-stereotypes in context: The importance of the grandparent-grandchild relationship in intergenerational communication. Human Communication Research., , & (in press).2004). Concluding voices, conversation fragments, and a temporary synthesis. In R.Anderson, L. A.Baxter, & K. N.Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 259–267). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., , & (1993). Painful inheritance: Health and the new generation of fatherless families. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press., & (1999). Rethinking relationships between divorced mothers and their children: Capitalizing on family strengths. Family Relations, 48, 109–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585074(1994). Contemporary family communication: Meanings and messages. New York: St. Martin's Press.(1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54, 317–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.5.317([Page 209]2001). An exploratory investigation of jealousy in the family. Journal of Family Communication, 2, 29–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0201_4, & (1989). The social support functions of siblings in later life: A theoretical model. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033001005(2003). Male sibling social and emotional support as a function of attributional confidence. Communication Research Reports, 20, 341–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388833(B A Squared, Inc. (2004). Mother-in-law stories. Retrieved December 14, 2004, from http://www.motherinlawstories.com1946). Father-fantasies and father-typing in father separated children. Child Development, 38, 243–250.(1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (C.Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.(1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C.Emerson & M.Holquist, Eds.; V.McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.(1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M.Holquist & V.Liapunov, Eds.; V.Liapunov & K.Brostrom, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.(2001). The grands and greats of very old black grandmothers. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065%2800%2900013-X(2005). Family violence across the lifespan: An introduction (, , & (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19(2), 175–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900204, & (1993). Family bonds: Adoption and the practice of parenting. New York: Houghton Mifflin.(1996). Consequences of fathers’ participation in family work: Parents’ role strain and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 983–992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.523, & (2001). Kinship ties of Mexican migrant women on the United States/Mexico border. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32, 549–569.(1993). The social side of personal relationships: A dialectical perspective. In S.Duck (Ed.), Understanding relationship processes, 3: Social context and relationships (pp. 139–165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(2004). Distinguished scholar article: Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00068.x(Relational dialectics: Multivocal dialogues of family communication. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication. Multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420(in press).2004). The basics of communication research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., & (2002). Performing marriage: The marriage renewal ritual as cultural performance. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 94–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417940209373223, & (Aesthetic love: A third way of love in stepfamilies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Relationship Research, Madison, WI., & (2004, July). [Page 210]2004). Types of communication triads perceived by young-adult stepchildren in established stepfamilies. Manuscript submitted for publication., , & (2004). Stepchildren's perceptions of the contradictions in communication with stepparents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 447–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504044841, , , & (1999). Turning points in the development of blended family relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 291–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407599163002, , & (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford., & (1995). Effects of paternal absence on male adolescents’ peer relations and self-image. Adolescence, 30, 873–880.(1993). Adult males’ perceptions of confirmation and relational partner communication apprehension: Indirect effects of fathers on sons’ partners. Communication Quarterly, 41, 66–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369868, & (2001). Similarities and differences in mother-daughter and mother-son conversations during preadolescence and adolescence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 419–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X01020004002, , & (1963). Childhood bereavement and adult depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 295–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1963.01720150105011, , & (1989a). A comparison of thematic apperceptions of sibling affiliation, conflict, and separation at two periods of adulthood. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 53–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/L5XM-HNGJ-4YTT-8KUT(1989b). Understanding the value of siblings in old age. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 33–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033001004(1990). Predictors of variation in positive and negative affect toward adult siblings. Family Perspectives, 24, 245–262.(1993). Relationships between adult siblings. In A. E.Auhagen & M.von Salisch (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships (pp. 119–141). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, Verlage fur Psychologie.(1995). Sibling relationships in middle and old age. In R.Blieszner & V. H.Bedford (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the family (pp. 201–222). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.(1993). Is the “contract across generations” changing? Effects of population aging on obligations and expectations across age groups. In V. L.Bengtson & W. A.Achenbaum (Eds.), The changing contract across generations (pp. 3–23). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.(1990). Families and aging. In R.Binstock & L.George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 263–287). New York: Academic Press., , & (2000). Family structure and children's success: A comparison of widowed and divorced single-mother families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 533–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00533.x, & ([Page 211]1993). Fathers and families: Paternal factors in child development. Westport, CT: Auburn House.(2002). College students’ perceptions of social support from grandmothers and stepgrandmothers. College Student Journal, 36, 419–432.(1987). Freud and the father complex. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 42, 425–441.(1994). Parental marital quality, parental divorce, and relations with parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 21–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352698, & (2001). Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce well being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 197–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00197.x, & (1999). Ambiguous loss. New York: Harvard University Press.(1995). The role of family emotional expressiveness in the development of children's social competence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 593–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353915, & (Braithwaite, D. O., & Baxter, L. A. (Eds.). (2005). Engaging theories in family communication. Multiple perspectives. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420“You're my parent but you're not”: Dialectical tensions in stepchildren's perceptions about communicating with the nonresidential parent. Journal of Applied Communication Research., & (in press).1998). The role of rituals in the management of dialectical tension of “old” and “new” in blended families. Communication Studies, 48, 101–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979809368523, , & (2003). “Parent teams” and the everyday interactions of co-parenting in stepfamilies. Communication Reports, 26, 93–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934210309384493, , & (2001). “Becoming a family”: Developmental processes represented in blended family discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 221–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909880128112, , , , & (Symbolic convergence theory: Communication, dramatizing messages, and rhetorical visions in families. In D. O.Braithwaite & L. A.Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication. Multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420, , & (in press).2004, February). Centered, but not caught in the middle: Stepchildren's perceptions of contradictions of communication of co-parents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM., , , , & (2000). Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. In S.Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 165–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(1998). Sibling relationship quality: Its causes and consequences. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.1(1996). Gender, emotional expression, and parent-child boundries. In R.Kavanaugh, B.Zimmerberg-Glick, & S.Fein (Eds.), Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 139–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.([Page 212]2002). Adoption agency perspectives on lesbian and gay prospective parents: A national study. Adoption Quarterly, 5, 5–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v05n03_02, , & (1990). The psychology of adoption. New York: Oxford University Press., & (1984). Children's understanding of adoption. Child Development, 55, 869–878. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130138, , & (1998). Children's adjustment to adoption: Developmental clinical psychology and psychiatry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452220581, , & (1993). Shadow and substance: A relational perspective on clinical process. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 10, 147–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0079464(1985). Father absence, perceived family characteristics and stage of drug use in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 87–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1985.tb00958.x, , & (2004, May 21). Japan's crown prince complains his wife is stifled by the imperial household. International Herald Tribune, p. 4.(1998). Grandparental impact in young adults’ relationships with their closest grandparents: The role of relationship strength and emotional closeness. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 46, 267–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/2B7B-E3LH-74JJ-UJRY, & (2001). The influence of in-laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 614–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00614.x, , & (2003). Stepchildren's perceptions of the contradictions in communication with stepfamilies formed post bereavement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.(1991). Caught between parents: Adolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development, 62, 1008–1029. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131149, , & (2001). The impact of interparental conflict on adolescent children: Considerations of family systems and family structure. In A.Booth, A. C.Crouter, & M.Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 149–161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (2003). The impact of maternal depression on familial relationships. International Review of Psychiatry, 15, 243–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0954026031000136866(1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773–789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2063, , & (1992). Black grandparents rearing children of drug-addicted parents: Stressors, outcomes, and social service needs. The Gerontologist, 32, 744–751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/32.6.744(1985). Black grandmothers: Timing and continuity of roles. In V. L.Bengtson & J. F.Robertson (Eds.), Grandparenthood (pp. 61–78). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage., & ([Page 213]1995). Relationship conflict: Conflict in parent-child, friendship, and romantic relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243795, , & (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376268, & (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10, 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099309359913, , , & (1995). Strong mothers, strong sons: Raising the next generation of men. New York: Perennial Books.(1998). Family matters: Secrecy and disclosure in the history of adoption. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2000). Intrafamily secrets in various family configurations: A communication boundary management perspective. Communication Studies, 51, 116–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970009388513, , , , , & (2004). Privacy in families. In A. L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 319–412). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002a). Deaths: The leading causes for 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports, 50, 1–86.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002b). Youth risk behavior surveillance system-United States, 2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51 (SS-14), 1–64.2001). Representing the family. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219546(2000). The impact of grandparental proximity on maternal childcare in China. Population Research and Policy Review, 19(6), 571–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010618302144, , & (1986). The new American grandparent: A place in the family, a life apart. New York: Basic Books., & (1994). Stepfamilies in the United States: A reconsideration. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 359–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.002043, & (2000). The last dive: A father and a son's fatal descent into the ocean's depths. New York: HarperCollins.(2001). That four letter word—sons: Lesbian mothers and adolescent sons. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 5, 195–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J155v05n01_13(1989). How old are you? Age consciousness in American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(1977). Relationship of siblings to the elderly person's feelings and concerns. Journal of Gerontology, 32, 317–322.(1979). Social services for elderly in relation to the kin network. Report to the NRTA-AARP Andrus Foundation.(1980). Sibling influence in adulthood: A life span perspective. In L. W.Poon (Ed.), Aging in the 1980's (pp. 455–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10050-033([Page 214]1982). Sibling influence throughout the lifespan. In M. E.Lamb & B.Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 267–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(1985a). The role of siblings as family caregivers. In W. J.Sauer & R. T.Coward (Eds.), Social support networks and the care of the elderly (pp. 93–107). New York: Springer-Verlag.(1985b). Siblings relationships thoughout the life cycle. In L.L'Abate (Ed.), The handbook of family psychology and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 177–214). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.(1989). Feelings of attachment to siblings and well being in later life. Psychology and Aging, 4, 211–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-79220.127.116.11(1990). Family support in relation to health problems of the elderly. In T. H.Brubaker (Ed.), Family relationships in later life ((2nd ed., pp. 218–228). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.1991). Sibling relationships in adulthood. In S. P.Pfeifer & M. B.Sussman (Eds.), Families: Intergenerational and generational connections (pp. 291–310). New York: Haworth Press.(1992). Family caregiving: Autonomous and paternalistic decisionmaking. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1994). Sibling relationship in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 7–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352697(1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York: Plenum Press.(1989). Relationships with siblings in later life. In J. F.Nussbaum (Ed.), Lifespan communication: Normative processes (pp. 283–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1990). The dialectic of marital and parental relationships within the stepfamily. Communication Monographs, 37, 44–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376184, , & (2002). From father to son: Showing your boy how to walk with Christ. New York: Navpress Publishing Group.(1997). Family communication and delinquency. Adolescence, 32, 81–92., & (1995). Grandchildren's perceptions of grandparental support in divorced and intact families. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 23, 127–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v23n03_08, & (1999). Boundary ambiguities that bind former spouses together after children leave home in postdivorce families. Family Relations, 48, 271–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585636, & (2001). Adolescent gender differences in social support: Structure, function, and provider type. Social Work Research, 25, 233–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/swr/25.4.233(2003). Differential effects of support providers on adolescents’ mental health. Social Work Research, 27, 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.1.19, & (2001). When you're not the Brady Bunch: Identifying perceived conflicts and resolution strategies in stepfamilies. Personal Relationships, 8, 57–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00028.x, , , , & ([Page 215]1998). Attitudes toward men's intergenerational financial obligations to older and younger male family members following divorce. Personal Relationships, 5, 293–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00173.x, & (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1288–1307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01288.x, , & (2004). Communication in stepfamilies. In A. L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 215–232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , & (2001). (In) visible men: Emerging research on low-income, unmarried, and minority fathers. American Psychologist, 56, 743–753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.9.743(1999). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In S.Coontz (Ed.), American families: A multicultural reader (pp. 197–217). New York: Routledge.(1994). Parent-adolescent conflict: A developmental approach. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 263–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319409374500(1989a). Contact between siblings in later life. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 14, 429–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3340651(1989b). Siblings as friends in later life. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 81–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033001008(1992). Life transitions and the adult sibling tie: A qualitative study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 972–982. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353176(1995). Closeness, confiding, and contact among siblings in middle and late adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 722–745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251395016006003, & (2000a). Historical perspectives on family diversity. In D. H.Demo, K. R.Allen, & M. A.Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 15–31). New York: Oxford University Press.(2000b). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgic trap. New York: Basic Books.(1991). Absent fathers, lost sons: The search for masculine identity. Boston: Shambala.(1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.168(1976). Toward an interactional description of depression. Psychiatry, 39, 28–39.(1992). Couples coping with chronic and catastrophic illness. In T. J.Akiamatsu, M. A. P.Stephens, S. E.Hobfoll, & J. H.Crowther (Eds.), Family health psychology (pp. 129–149). Washington, DC: Publishing Corp., & (1988). The other side of social support: Emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping. In B. H.Gottlieb (Ed.), Marshalling social support: Formats, processes, and effects (pp. 305–330). Newbury Park, CA: Sage., , & (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1981). The meaning of things. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press., & ([Page 216]1994). Children and marital conflict: The impact of family dispute and resolution. New York: Guilford Press., & (1991). Sexuality and communication in close relationships. In. K.McKinney & S.Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 93–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., & (1997). Openness in adoption: Experiences and social psychological outcomes among birth mothers. Marriage and Family Review, 25, 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J002v25n01_02, , & (1996). The interplay of negative and supportive behaviors in marriage. In G.Pierce, B.Sarason, & I.Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 173–194). New York: Plenum.(1993). The myths and misconceptions of the stepmother identity: Descriptions and prescriptions for identity management. Family Relations, 42, 93–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584928(1999). Progressive ed's war on boys. City Journal, 9, 26–32.(2003). Parent care by Indian and Belgian caregivers in their roles of daughter/daughter-in-law. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 736–749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022103258589, , & (1983). Father's absence and moral development of male delinquents. Psychological Reports, 54, 223–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1922.214.171.124(1997). Service needs of relative caregivers: A qualitative analysis. Families in Society, 78, 502–510.(1996). Marriage and family: Change and continuity. Boston: Allyn & Bacon., & (1997). Having something in common. In J.Wells (Ed.), Lesbians raising sons. Los Angeles: Alyson Books.(Day, R. D., & Lamb, M. E. (Eds.). (2004). Conceptualizing and measuring father involvement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1974). Memoirs of a dutiful daughter. Middlesex, UK: Penguin.(1997). Intercountry adoption and the family life cycle. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 245–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926189708251070(1998). Fathering and early onset conduct problems: Positive and negative parenting, father-son attachment, and the marital context. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 3–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021844214633, , & (2000). Young adult children and grandchildren in primary caregiver roles to older relatives and their service needs. Family Relations, 49, 177–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00177.x, , & (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., , , & (1997). Boys to men: The maturing of male identity through paternal watchful protectiveness. Gender Psychoanalysis, 2, 443–468.(2004). The shaping of masculinity: Revisioning boys turning away from their mothers to construct male gender identity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 359–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1516/U8XV-LG0A-WXNW-1285([Page 217]2004). Men's relationships with their fathers: Comparing men who batter women with non-violent men. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 4, 61–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J135v04n01_04(1998). Fictive kin, paper sons, compadrazgo: Women of color and the struggle for family survival. In K. V.Hansen & A. I.Garey (Eds.), Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 431–145). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.(1987). Strategies for maintaining and repairing personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000201, & (2003). Final rounds: A father, a son, the golf journey of a lifetime. New York: Bantam Books.(1998). Responsible fathers: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 277–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353848, , & (1996). Parents’ disclosure of their own concerns to their adolescent children. Personal Relationships, 3, 159–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00109.x(1999). Disclosure between college students and their siblings. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 393–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3126.96.36.1993, & (1989). The grandparent-grandchild relationship. In J. F.Nussbaum (Ed.), Lifespan communication: Normative processes (pp. 257–281). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(1994). Reframing gerontological thought and practice: The case of grandmothers with daughters in prison. The Gerontologist, 34, 685–691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/34.5.685, & (2002). Implications for grandparents when they lose contact with their grandchildren: Divorce, family feud, and geographical separation. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 8(2), 95–119., & (1993). Reexamining gender differences in same-sex friendships: A close look at two kinds of data. Sex Roles, 28, 709–727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289989, & (1996). Growing up under the gun: Children and adolescents coping with violent neighborhoods. Journal of Primary Prevention, 16, 343–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02411740(1996, April). Fathers’ activities and child attainments. Paper presented at the NICHD Family and Child Well-Being Network's Conference on Father Involvement, Bethesda, MD., , & (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their young children. Developmental Pschology, 23, 132–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.52, , & (2002). Out of the picture: A study of family drawings by children from step-, single-parent, and non-step families. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 505–512., , & (1993). Relationships with former in-laws: Normative guidelines and actual behavior. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 19, 69–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v19n03_05(1995). Exposure to violence and victimization and depression, hopelessness, and purpose in life among adolescents living in and around public housing. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 16, 233–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004703-199508000-00004, , , , & ([Page 218]1954). In-laws: Pro and con. New York: Association Press.(2000, July 9). Boys under siege. Washington Times, p. B8.(Exploring nieces/nephews’ perspectives on communication with aunts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships., & (in press).1996). Talking over ethnography. In C.Ellis & A. P.Bochner (Eds.), Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing (pp. 13—45). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira., & (Communication privacy management theory and international adoption. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Western States Communication Association, Salt Lake City, UT.(2003, February).1994). Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation. New York: Guilford Press.(1994). Conceptualizing the divorce process: Renegotiating boundaries of intimacy and power in the divorce family system. Family Relations, 43, 374–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585367, & (2005). Non-normative relationships: Is there a norm of (non)normativity?Western Journal of Communication, 69, 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310500033909(2004). Affectionate expressions as face-threatening acts: Receiver assessments. Communication Studies, 55, 230–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388618, & (1985). Women's lives viewed from an evolutionary perspective, II. Patterns of helping. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 155–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095%2885%2990028-7, & (1997). Benchmark adoption survey: Report on findings. New York: Author.. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (2000). The lost daughters of China: Abandoned girls, their journey to America, and the search for a missing past. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.(2002). Grandparents: A new look at the supporting generation. Prometheus, NY: Amherst., & (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American man. New York: William Morrow.(1991). The wounded male. New York: Ballantine.(2001). Living arrangements of children 1996. In Current Population Reports (pp. 70–74). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.(2000). The role of grandparents in the social support system of mothers of children with a physical disability. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 81, 370–381.(1998). Consistency in perceptions of the stepparent role among stepparents, parents, and stepchildren. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 811–829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407598156006, , & (1995). Relation between marital quality and (step)parent-child relationships quality for parents and stepparents in stepfamilies. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 216–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3184.108.40.206, & (2001). Aging mothers and their adult daughters: A study in mixed emotions. New York: Springer.([Page 219]1999). Season's greetings: Adults’ social contact at the holiday season. Psychology and Aging, 14, 192–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-79220.127.116.11, & (2002). Searching under the streetlight? Age biases in the personal and family relationships literature. Personal Relationships, 9, 415–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.09404, & (1981). Transitions in the mother-daughter relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 613–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351762(1983a). Married men and their mothers. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 393–402.(1983b). Mothers and mothers-in-law. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 187–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351307(1986). Linked lives. New York: Harper and Row.(1991). Between mothers and daughters. Marriage and Family Review, 16, 237–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J002v16n03_02(2003). A critique of the portrayal of adoption in college textbooks and readers on families, 1998–2001. Family Relations, 52, 154–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00154.x(2004). Mothers’ and daughters’ perceptions of turning points that affected closeness in the relationship over time. Unpublished master's thesis, Arizona State University West.(1990). Ethnosemiotics: Some personal and theoretical reflections. Cultural Studies, 4, 85–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502389000490061(2004). Emotion and communication in families. In A. L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 473–494). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1993). The prevalence and consequences of exposure to violence among African-American youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 424–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199303000-00026, & (1988). Between husbands and wives: Communication in marriage. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.(1994). All in the family: Interpersonal communication in kin relationships. In M. L.Knapp & G. R.Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (, & (2nd ed., pp. 726–771). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1995). Gender and closeness among friends and siblings. Journal of Psychology, 129, 193–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1995.9914958(1996a). Brotherly love I: The experience of closeness in the fraternal dyad. Personal Relationship, 3, 369–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00122.x(1996b). Communicating closeness among siblings: An application of the gendered closeness perspective. Communication Research Reports, 13, 27–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099609362067(1997). Brotherly love II: A developmental perspective on liking, love, and closeness in the fraternal dyad. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 196–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-318.104.22.168(2005). Human affection exchange VIII: Further evidence of the benefits of expressed affection, independent of the benefits of received affection. Communication Quarterly, 53, 285–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370500101071, , , , , & ([Page 220]2000). Affection received from fathers as a predictor of men's affection with their own sons: Tests of the modeling and compensation hypotheses. Communication Monographs, 67, 347–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376516, & (2002). Human affection exchange III: Discriminative parental solicitude in men's affectionate communication with their biological and nonbiological sons. Communication Quarterly, 49, 310–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385631, & (2003). Human affection exchange II: Affectionate communication in father-son relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 599–613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598466, & (2003). Human affection exchange VII: Affectionate communication in the sibling/spouse/sibling-in-law triad. Communication Quarterly, 51, 247–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370309370155, & (1997). Differential accounts of closeness in older adult sibling relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 843–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407597146008, , , , & (2004). Marriage drain's big cost. American Demographics, 26, 40–41.(2000). Birthmother perceptions of the psychologically present adopted child: Adoption openness and boundary ambiguity. Family Relations, 49, 425–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00425.x, , & (1917/1966). The complete introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.(1923). The ego and the id. In J.Strachey (Trans.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 12–68). New York: Norton.(2002). “Embryo adoption”: Are we ready for this new frontier?Adoption Quarterly, 6, 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v06n02_01(1996). Social support in healthy adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 17–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01537378, & (1999). Ethnic identity development of internationally adopted children and adolescents: Implications for family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 43–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1999.tb01109.x(1999). Brian Friel: Plays two: Dancing at Lughnasa, Fathers and Sons, Making History, Wonderful Tennessee, Molley Sweeney. New York: Faber & Faber.(2001, November). South Korean adoptees growing up in white America: Negotiating race, ethnicity and multivocality. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.(2004). Measuring mother and father shared caregiving: An analysis using the panel study of income dynamics-child development supplement. In R. D.Day & M. E.Lamb (Eds.), Conceptualizing and measuring father involvement (pp. 341–357). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (Funk & Wagnalls new international dictionary of the English language. (2001). Chicago: Ferguson Publishing.1996). Personality and sibling relationships. In G. H.Brody (Ed.), Sibling relationships: Their causes and consequences (pp. 127–246). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing., & ([Page 221]1988). Good dads-bad dads: Two faces of fatherhood. In A.Cherlin (Ed.), The changing American family and public policy (pp. 193–218). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.(2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press., & (2000, October). Girls are exportable: The paradoxical issues of gender identity and cultural socialization in parent-child discussions of transnational adoption. Paper presented at the meeting of the Organization for Language, Communication and Gender, Milwaukee, WI.(2003). International and transracial adoption: A communication research agenda. Journal of Family Communication, 3, 237–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0304_5(2004). The family of the future: What do we face? In A.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 675–697). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(Discourse-dependency: Diversity's impact on defining the family. In R.West & L. H.Turner (Eds.), Family communication: A reference of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(in press).2004). Family communication: Cohesion and change (, , & (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.2003, April). “The Mailman” as family defense strategy: Internationalltransracial adoption and mixed sibling communication strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Communication Association Conference, Omaha, NE., & (1993). An exploratory study of stepsibling subsystems. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 19(3/4), 125–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v19n03_09, & (1994). Remarried family relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., & (1998). An exploratory study of grandparents’ and stepgrandparents’ financial obligations to grandchildren and stepgrand-children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 39–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407598151003, & (1999). Stepparents’ affinity-seeking and affinity-maintaining strategies with stepchildren. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 299–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251399020003001, , , & (2004). Stepfamily relationships: Development, dynamics, and interventions. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9112-6, & (1996). Self and other: A Chinese perspective on interpersonal relationships. In W. B.Gudykunst, S.Ting-Toomey, & T.Nishida (Eds.), Communication in personal relationships across cultures (pp. 81–101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2004, July). Adolescents’ perceptions of communication with elders, young adults, and peers. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, University Park, PA., & (2003). The martian child: A novel about a single father adopting a son. New York: Tor Books.(1993). Kinkeeping and distress: Gender, recipients of care, and work-family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 598–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353341, & ([Page 222]1996, Spring). Family complexity and the grandparent role. Generations, 17–23., , & (2004). Perceived discrimination and substance use in African American parents and their children: A panel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 517–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1247, , , , & (1986). Expressive relations and social support. In H. L.Kendig (Ed.), Aging and families: A social network perspective (pp. 63–84). Boston: Allen & Unwin., & (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.(2005). The global revolution in family and personal life. In A. S.Skolnick & J. H.Skolnick (Eds.), Family in transition (pp. 26–32). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.(1998). Relational continuity, constructional units and maintenance of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 774–790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407598156004, , & (1989). Adolescent power in stepfather families: A test of normative-resource theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 1065–1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353217, & (1996). A world of their own making: Myth, ritual, and the quest for family values. New York: Basic Books.(1988). Perceived changes in grandmother-grandchild relations following a child's separation or divorce. The Gerontologist, 28, 66–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/28.1.66(1981). The contribution of marital happiness to global happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 161–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351426, & (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., & (1986). The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 703–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352563(1989a). Generational solidarity. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033001003(1989b). Sibling relationships in old age: A typology. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 37–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/VGYX-BRHN-J51V-0V39(1990). Patterns of support among in-laws in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 67–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251390011001005(2000). Changes in closeness between adult children and their parents: A turning point analysis. Communication Reports, 13, 79–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934210009367727(2002). I'd rather not talk about it: Adolescents’ and young adults’ use of topic avoidance in stepfamilies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 78–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909880216574, & (2003). Stepfamily communication strengths: Examining the ties that bind. Human Communication Research, 29, 41–80.(2005). The theoretical importance of the family. In A. S.Skolnick & J. H.Skolnick (Eds.), Family in transition (pp. 14–25). Boston: Pearson.(2003). Sons talk about their gay fathers: Life curves. New York: Harrington Park Press.([Page 223]1982). Emotional responsiveness in marital conversations. Journal of Communication, 32, 108–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb02504.x(1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2000). The seven principles for making marriage work. Pittsburgh, PA: Three Rivers Press.(1997). Turning points and commitment in postdivorce relationships. Communication Monographs, 64, 351–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759709376428(2003). Dialectical contradictions in postmarital relationships. Journal of Family Communication, 3, 193–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0304_3(1999). Parents’ and adolescents’ perceptions of a strong family. Psychological Reports, 84, 1219–1224., & (1995). When divorced fathers want no contact with their children: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 23, 75–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v23n01_06(1995). Communication-family characteristics: A comparison between stepfamilies (formed after death or divorce) and biological families. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 24(1/2), 183–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v24n01_12(2000). Openness in adoption: Research with the adoption kinship network. Adoption Quarterly, 4, 45–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v04n01_04(2000). Adoptive identity: How contexts within and beyond the family shape developmental pathways. Family Relations, 49, 379–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00379.x, , , & (Openness in adoption: Outcomes for adolescents within their adoptive kinship networks. In D.Brodzinsky & J.Palacios (Eds.), Psychological issues in adoption: Theory, research and application. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing., , & (in press).2004). First fathers: The men who inspired our presidents. New York: Wiley.(1997). The wonder of boys: What parents, mentors, and educators can do to raise boys into exceptional men. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.(1986). Adult intergenerational relationships: Parents and children. In L. E.Troll (Ed.), Review of human development (pp. 191–226). New York: Wiley-Interscience.(1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S.Harding & M. B.Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 283–310). Boston: Ridel.(2000a). Communication media use in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 56–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02863.x(2000b). Communicative predictors of solidarity in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 743–766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407500176003(2004). Relational, role, and social identity as expressed in grandparents’ personal web sites. Communication Studies, 55, 268–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388621(2005). Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes towards older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 393–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271577, , , & ([Page 224]2000). Affiliation, pride, exchange and distance in grandparents’ accounts of relationships with their college-age grandchildren. Journal of Communication, 50(3), 31–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02851.x, & (2004, July). Communicative dynamics of age salience. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, University Park, PA., , & (1995). My old man and the sea: A father and son sail around Cape Horn. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books., & (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.(1985). Interdependence in informal support systems: The case of elderly, urban widows. In W. A.Peterson & J.Quadagno (Eds.), Social bonds in later life (pp. 165–186). Beverly Hills: Sage.(1992). Romantic love. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (2000). Maintaining nonvoluntary relationships with disliked partners: An investigation into the use of distancing behaviors. Human Communication Research, 26, 458–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00765.x(1999a). Coping with divorce, single parenting, and remarriage: A risk and resiliency perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(1999b). Family functioning and the adjustment of adolescent siblings in diverse types of families. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64, 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.00045(1982). Effects of divorce on parents and children. Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development (pp. 233–259). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , & (1995). Parenting in divorced and remarried families. In M.Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1989). Marital transitions: A child's perspective. American Psychologist, 44, 303–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.303, , & (2001, October). The 65 years and over population: 2000. Census 2000 Brief. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-10.pdf, & (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1998). (Re)constructing relationships with grandparents: A turning point analysis of granddaughters’ relational development with maternal grandmothers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 46, 287–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/00GV-5PWF-UDNH-EHDV, , & (2003, November). Communication between grandparents and grandchildren in geographically dispersed relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Miami, FL., & ([Page 225]2003). Openness in adoption, knowledge of birthparent information, and adoptive family adjustment. Adoption Quarterly, 7, 43–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v07n01_04, , , , & (2003). When an adoption disrupts: A study of public attitudes. Family Relations, 52, 161–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00161.x(1991). The relationship between divorced mothers’ perceived control over child rearing and children's postdivorce development. Family Relations, 40, 272–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585011, & (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999%2867%2990010-4, & (2004). Media, home, and family. New York: Routledge., , & (2002). Relational dialectics and management strategies in marital couples. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 142–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417940209373226, & (1991). The presence of the past: Male violence in the family. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.(1994). Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, 240–249., , , & (2004, September 28). U.S. Adoptions get easier. Wall Street Journal, p. D1.(1993). Father-son healing: An adult son's guide. New York: New Harbinger. Immigrant visas issued to orphans coming to the U.S. (2004). Retrieved June 15, 2004, from http://travel.state.gov/orphan_numbers.html(2003). Redressing inequity in parent care among siblings. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 201–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00201.x, , , & (1987). Impaired natural killer cell activity during bereavement. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 1, 98–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-1591%2887%2990011-0, , , , & (1998). The authoritarian parenting index: Predicting health risk behaviors among children and adolescents. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 319–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109019819802500307, , & (1988). Extending the extended family: The mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship of black women. Family Relations, 37, 293–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584565, & (1998). Listen to me: A book for women and men about father-son relationships. New York: Celestial Arts., & (1993). Grandparents who parent their grandchildren: Effects on lifestyle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 609–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353342(1994). Grandparents who parent their grandchildren: Circumstances and decisions. The Gerontologist, 34, 206–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/34.2.206(1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. San Diego, CA: Academic Press., & ([Page 226]1999). Infant abandonment and adoption in China. Population and Development Review, 24, 469–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2808152, , & (2003). The impact of father absence on adolescent separation-indviduation. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 73–95., , , & (1997). Friends for life. New York: William Morrow., & (1993). The relational self: A model of women's development. In J.van Mens-Verhulst, J.Schreurs, & L.Woertman (Eds.), Daughtering and mothering: Female subjectivity reanalysed (pp. 135–144). New York: Routledge.(1989). Where is the “family” in family communication?: Exploring families’ self-definitions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 17, 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909888909365282(1994). Situated address and the social construction of “in-law” relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 55, 196–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372938(2001). Distinguishing the link between disrupted families and delinquency. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 22–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.1.22, & (1990). Psychosocial predictors of stress associated with the male midlife transition. Sex Roles, 22, 707–722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00292056, , & (1969). Essays on a science of mythology: The myths of the divine child and the mysteries of Eleusis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press., & (1991). Treatment of parental children and their families: Conceptual and technical issues. American Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 302–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926189108250862, , & (2001). Parentification of adult children of divorce: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 245–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010349925974, , (1998). Asian grandparents. In M. E.Szinovacz (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 97–112). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.(1988). Discourse about adoption in adoptive families. Journal of Family Psychology, 1, 406–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080464, & (1999). Experimentally disentangling what's beneficial about elderspeak from what's not. Psychology and Aging, 14, 656–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-79126.96.36.1996, & (1989). Lifespan changes to adults’ language: Effects of memory and genre. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 49–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400008419, , , , & (1993). Marital quality and gender differences in parent-child interaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 931–939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.521, , & (1988). Marital discord and immunity in males. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 213–229., , , , , & (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U.Kim, H. C.Triandis, C.Kagitcibasi, S.-C.Choi, & G.Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 19–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.([Page 227]1999). Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys. New York: Ballantine., & (2003). The legacy of a grandparent's divorce: Consequences for ties between grandparents and grandchildren. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 170–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00170.x(1997). The legacy of grandparenting: Childhood experiences with grandparents and current involvement with grandchildren. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 848–859. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353787, & (2000). Church, family, and friends. In G. H.Elder & R. D.Conger (Eds.), Children of the land: Adversity and success in rural America (pp. 151–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press., , & (2003). An organizational communication challenge to the discourse of work and family research: From problematics to empowerment. In P. J.Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook 27 (pp. 1–43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , , , & (1988). Attitudes toward older and younger adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 3, 233–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-79184.108.40.206, & (1985). Consanguinity and kin level: Their relative importance to the helping network of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 228–234.(1998). The myth that schools shortchange girls: Social science in the service of deception. Washington, DC: Women's Freedom Network.(2002). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12, 70–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00260.x, & (2000). When mothers turn to their adolescent daughters: Predicting daughters’ vulnerability to negative adjustment outcomes. Family Relations, 49, 301–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00301.x, , & (2002). Mother-to-daughter disclosure after divorce: Are there costs and benefits?Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 469–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020987509405, , , & (1998). New pioneers in the heartland: Hmong life in Wisconsin. New Immigrant Series (N.Foner, Ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.(1985). Grandparenthood and the “new social contract”. In V. L.Bengtson & J. F.Robertson (Eds.), Grandparenthood (pp. 159–172). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1981). Grandparents/grandchildren: The vital connection. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday., & (1989). On adult daughters and their mothers: A peripatetic consideration of developmental tasks. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 1, 27–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J086v01n02_03(2003, October). Adopted children and stepchildren: 2000 (CENSR-6RV). Census 2000, Special Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-6.pdf([Page 228]2001). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: Fall 1996 [Current population reports, P70–80]. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census., & (2003). Marital status: 2000 [U.S. Census Bureau Brief Number C2KBR-30]. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retrieved August 9, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-30.pdf, & (2000). Identity development: Adolescence through adulthood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2000). My name is … In M. W.Lustig & J.Koester (Eds.), Among us: Essays on identity, belonging, and intercultural competence (pp. 18–23). New York: Longman.(2001). “He was our child from the moment we walked into that room”: Entrance stories of adoptive parents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 785–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407501186003, & (2004, November). Communication privacy management of stepsiblings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.(1987). The father's role: Applied perspectives. New York: Wiley.(1997). The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley.(2004). Growing up adopted. Retrieved April 1, 2004, from http://www.adoptivefamilies.com(1999). Research into action: Recommended intervention strategies for grandparent caregivers. Family Relations, 48(4), 381–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585245(2002). Performing family stories, forming cultural identity: Franco American Memere stories. Communication Studies, 53, 56–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970209388574(2004). Storytelling in daily life: Performing narrative. Philadelphia: Temple University Press., & (1999). Transmission of emotions in the daily interactions of single-mother families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 21–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353880, & (1994). Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York: Basic Books., & (1995). Conflict and social interaction in adolescent relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5, 55–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0501_3(1998). Reconsidering changes in parent-child conflict across adolescence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 69, 817–832., , & (1996). A binding tie: Supportive communication of family kinkeepers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 200–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889609365451, & (1998). Moderators of gender effects on parents’ talk to their children: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34, 3–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.11, , & ([Page 229]1987). The flying boy: Healing the wounded man. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications.(1991). At my father's wedding: Reclaiming our true masculinity. New York: Bantam Books.(1990). Sibling relationships in adulthood: Contact patterns and motivations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 431–440. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353037, , & (2002). Family financial hardship and adolescent girls’ adjustment: The role of maternal disclosure of financial concerns. Merill-Palmer Quarterly, 48, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2002.0003, & (1982). Kinship interaction over the family life span. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 197–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351273(1999, December 13). How boys lost out to girl power. New York Times, p. 3.(2003). Mortality in parents after death of a child in Denmark: A nationwide follow-up study. Lancet, 361, 363–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2803%2912387-2, , , & (2000). Impact of perceived parental monitoring on adolescent risk behavior over 4 years. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 49–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X%2800%2900092-6, , & (1995). ‘Til death do us part: Marital disruption and mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1131–1156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230634, & (2003). Predictors of grandparent-grandchild relational solidarity in Taiwan. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 537–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02654075030204006, & (2004). Age identity representation in online discourse. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 261–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.03.006, , & (1993). Pedaling northwards: A father and son's bicycle adventure from Virginia to Canada. New York: Hope Springs Press.(2002). Qualitative communication research methods (, & (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2002). Marital conflict and boys’ peer relationships: The mediating role of mother-son emotional reciprocity. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 466–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-318.104.22.1686, , , , & (2005). Expenditures on children by families, 2004. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1528–2004.(1999). Posttraumatic stress disorder in hospitalized adolescents: Psychiatric co-morbidity and clinical correlates. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 385–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199904000-00010, , , , & (2003). Undesirable girls: China combats problem of baby girls being left for dead. Retrieved August 25, 2003, from http://www.abcnews.com(2000). Fathers, sons, and brothers: The men in my family. New York: Washington Square Press.([Page 230]1998). Coping as a communal process. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 579–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407598155001, , , & (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E. M.Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley., & (1999). Boundary ambiguity and coparental conflict after divorce: An empirical test of a family systems model of the divorce process. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 588–598. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353562, , & (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books., , & (1994). Stepfamilies and the law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.(1990). An investigation of systemic conceptualizations of parent-child coalitions and symptom change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 336–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.58.3.336, , , & (2000, November). Mapping the journey: A narrative study of the transition to adoptive parenthood. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Seattle, WA.(2001). International adoption and bi-cultural identity development: A case study of a Chinese cultural school. Journal of Intergroup Relations, 28, 17–30.(2002). Renovations: A father and son rebuild a house and rediscover each other. New York: Riverhead Books.(1995). The aging family. In M. A.Fitzpatrick & A. L.Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 344–374). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1987). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: The effects of proximity on conflict and stress. Family Relations, 36, 385–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584488, & (1992). Stepfathers with minor children living at home: Parenting perceptions and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 195–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251392013002005(1997). The relationship between perceived understanding and self-disclosure in the sibling relationship. Communication Research Reports, 14, 331–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388676, , & (1994). Adolescent problem behavior: The effect of peers and the moderating role of father absence and the mother-child relationship. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 723–743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02521556, , , & (1996). Negative family environment as a predictor of boys’ future status on measures of hostile attitudes, interview behavior, and anger expression. Health Psychology, 15, 30–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-622.214.171.124, , , & (1987). Provision of care to old parents: Division of care among adult children. Research on Aging, 9, 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0164027587009001002(1985). The effects of siblings on the life satisfaction of the rural elderly. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352071([Page 231]2000). First and last seasons: A father, a son, and Sunday afternoon football. New York: Doubleday Books.(2003). Highway 61: A father and son journey through the middle of America. New York: W.W. Norton., & (1998). Raising adopted children. New York: Harper Perennial.(2002). Strangers and kin: The American way of adoption. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1996). A systemic approach to in-law dilemmas. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22, 469–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1996.tb00221.x(1992). Father hunger: Why soup kitchen fathers are not good enough. In K.Hagen (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement. San Francisco: Harper.(2004, May). The role of physical separation in the sibling relationship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.(2000). Trust and disclosure of sexual orientation in gay males’ mother-son relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 38, 41–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v38n03_03, & (1984). Paternal absence and its effects on adolescent self-esteem. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 30, 293–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002076408403000406(2004). Communication among grandmothers, mothers, and adult daughters: A qualitative study of maternal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2005). Effective parent-child communication: A preventive measure. Counselor, 6, 70–71.(1992). The mother-daughter relationship: Narrative as a path to understanding. Women's Studies in Communication, 15, 1–21.(1998). Changes and conflicts: Korean immigrant families in New York. New York: Allyn & Bacon.(1974). Family and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1967). Relationship of father absence to masculinity and popularity of delinquent boys. Psychological Reports, 20, 1173–1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3c.1173, & (2004). Common themes for couples of open adoption. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.(1983). Parents and adolescents in conflict: All families some of the time and some families most of the time. Journal of Early Adolescence, 3, 83–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027243168331007(Montgomery, B. M., & Baxter, L. A. (Eds.). (1998). Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1998). “I love you, man”: Overt expressions of affection in male-male interaction. Sex Roles, 38, 871–881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018885417249, & (2002). A “changing culture of fatherhood”: Effects on affectionate communication, closeness, and satisfaction in men's relationships with their fathers and their sons. Western Journal of Communication, 66, 395–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570310209374746, & ([Page 232]2003, November). Good fathering: Men's perceptions of quality fatherhood behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA., & (2003, February). Private disclosure in a family membership transition: Focus group investigation of in-laws’ disclosures to newlyweds. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Salt Lake City, UT.(2003). The prevalence of PTSD following the violent death of a child and predictors of change 5 years later. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(1), 17–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022003126168, , , & (1998). Sibling communication satisfaction as a function of interpersonal solidarity, individualized trust, and self-disclosure. Communication Research Reports, 15, 309–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362127(1999). Perceived sibling use of relational communication messages and sibling satisfaction, liking, and love. Communication Research Reports, 16, 339–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099909388735, , , , , , et al. (1998). Perceived sibling use of functional communication skills. Communication Research Reports, 15, 397–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362139, & (2001). Relational maintenance behaviors in the sibling relationship. Communication Quarterly, 49, 19–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385612, & Members of COM 200. (National Adoption Information Clearinghouse. (2004). Openness in adoption: A fact sheet for families. Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://naic.acf.hhs.gov/pubs/f_openadopt.cfmNational Center for Health Statistics. (1995). Births, marriages, divorce, and death for September, 1994. Monthly Vital Statistics Report, 43(9) (DHHS Publication No. 94–1120). Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service.National Center for Health Statistics. (2003a). Table 2. Live births by age of mother, live-birth order, and race of mother: United States, 2002. National Vital Statistics Report, 52. Retrieved August 9, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/pdf/nvsr52_10t2.pdfNational Center for Health Statistics. (2003b). Table 27. Life expectancy at birth, at 65 years of age, and at 75 years of age, according to race and sex: United States, selected years 1900–2001. Retrieved August 9, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/tables/2003/03hus027.pdfNational Opinion Research Center. (1998). General Social Survey, 1998 [data file]. Available from the GSS 1998 Codebook Web site, http://www.icpsr.umich.edu:8080/GSS/homepage.htm2003). Understanding other people's perspectives: Tasks for adopters in open adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 6, 3–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v06n03_02(1996). Collecting ourselves at the end of the century. In C.Ellis & A. P.Bochner (Eds.), Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing (pp. 172–200). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.([Page 233]1990). Social support and personal characteristics: A developmental and interactional perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 54–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.19126.96.36.199(2004). Code-switching in tri-generational family conversations among Chinese immigrants in New Zealand. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 28–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X03260807, & (2004). Studying family communication: Multiple methods and multiple sources. In A.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 31–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1994). Shared stories of the grandparent-grandchild relationship. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 67–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/7WPK-LM6C-QCA4-GQ4R, & (2004). Handbook of communication and aging research (, & (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1991). The development of paternal and filial maturity. In K.Pillemer (Ed.), Parent-child relations throughout life (pp. 93–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2003). Working fathers: Earning and caring. London: Equal Opportunities Commission., & (2002). Fathers and their adolescent sons: Pubertal development and paternal involvement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 418–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07458402017004006, , & (1993). Becoming a stepfamily: Patterns of development in remarried families. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.(1979). The impact of divorce and subsequent father absence on children's and adolescents’ self-concepts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 8, 427–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02088659, & (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press., & (2003). Effects of parenting, father absence, and affiliation with delinquent peers on delinquent behavior among African American male adolescents. Adolescence, 38, 15–34., , & (1996). Violence and mental health problems among urban high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 18, 320–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1054-139X%2895%2900063-X, , & (1999). Grand Canyon celebration: A father-son journey of discovery. New York: Prometheus Books.(2000). Birth marks: Transracial adoption in contemporary America. New York: New York University Press.(2004). Psychological distress for African-American adolescent males: Exposure to community violence and social support as factors. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 34, 281–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:CHUD.0000020680.67029.4f, , , & ([Page 234]2000). Beyond the father wound: Memory-work and the deconstruction of the father-son relationship. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 9–15.(2002). Young adults’ stereotypes of older adults with their grandparents as the targets. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 715–730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02570.x, & (2004). The family lives of lesbians and gay men. In A. L.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 233–248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (2000). Adoption nation. New York: Basic Books.(Peters, H. E., & Day, R. D. (Eds.). (2000). Fatherhood: Research, interventions, and policies, Parts 1 & 2. Marriage and the Family Review, 29, 1–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J002v29n02_011986). Marital disruption, parent-child relationships, and behavioral problems in children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 295–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352397, & (1991). Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples. Communication Theory, 1, 311–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00023.x(2000). The boundaries of privacy: Praxis in everyday life. In S.Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosure (pp. 37–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany: State University of New York Press.(1998). Multigenerational conflicts and new immigrants: An Indo-American experience. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 79, 410–423., & (Pew Project on the Internet and American Life. (2000). Tracking online life: How women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Retrieved April 10, 2004, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/index.asp1989). Mothers'-in-law and daughters'-in-law perceptions of interpersonal interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.(2003). Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 31–54.(2004). Paternal involvement by U.S. residential fathers: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E.Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (, & (4th ed., pp. 222–271). New York: Wiley.2000). Wishing my father well: A memoir of fathers, sons, and fly fishing. New York: Overlook Press.(1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House.(1997). Loneliness and sibling relationships. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 103–112., & (1993). American family decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 527–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353333([Page 235]2004). Father your son: How to become the father you've always wanted to be. New York: McGraw-Hill.(2005). Uncertainty management and adoptees’ ambiguous loss of their birth parents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 129–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407505049325, & (1989). The nurturing male: A longitudinal study of primary nurturing fathers. In S. H.Cath, A.Gurwitt, & L.Gunsberg (Eds.), Fathers and their families (pp. 389–405). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.(1989). Young adult relationships: Siblings and friends. Journal of Psychology, 123, 237–245.(1990). Correlations between family environment and relationships of young adult siblings. Psychological Reports, 67, 1283–1286.(2003). Parent-adolescent communication about sex: Retrospective reports by Latino college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 474–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00474.x, & (1999). Family and class in contemporary America: Notes toward an understanding of ideology. In S.Coontz (Ed.), American families: A multicultural reader (pp. 180–196). New York: Routledge.(1999). Adult daughters’ perception of the mother-daughter relationship: A cross-cultural comparison. Family Relations, 48, 327–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585643, & (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.(1988). Michael Reagan: On the outside looking in. New York: Zebra Books., & (1991). Are those kids yours? American families with children adopted from other countries. New York: The Free Press.(1992). Adoption and the family system. New York: Guilford Press., & (1977). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: Bantam Books.(2000). Coping strategies and postdivorce health outcomes. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 34, 41–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v34n01_03, & (2004). Maternal employment and the work and family attitudes and expectations of young adults. In D.Halpern & S. E.Murphy (Eds.), From work-family balance to work-family interaction: Changing the metaphor (pp. 202–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28, 493–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2061419(1994). Major dimensions of personality in early adolescence: The big five and beyond. In C. F.Halverson, Jr. & G. A.Kohnstamm (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 267–291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., , & ([Page 236]1998). The relationship between willingness to communicate and solidarity with frequency, breadth, and depth of communication in the sibling relationship. Communication Research Reports, 15, 82–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362100, & (1986). ‘Aunt Sophie always said…’: Oral histories of the commonplaces women learned about relating to men. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 342–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000276486029003006(1985). Stepsibling relationships in remarried families. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 66, 287–292., & (1985). Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 965–974. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352340(1982). Important variables in adult sibling relationships: A qualitative study. In M. E.Lamb & B.Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 225–249). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1994). Parental caregiving and child externalizing behavior in nonclinical samples: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 55–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.55, & (2004). Big Russ and me: Father and son—lessons of life. New York: Miramax Books.(1994). Age-based perceptions of conversational skills among younger and older adults. In M. L.Hummert, J. M.Wiemann, & J. F.Nussbaum (Eds.), Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 15–39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., , , & (2003). The contemporary American family: A dialectical perspective on communication and relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452232430(1999). Knowledge of no return: Getting and giving information about genetic risk. Acta Ontologica, 38, 735–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/028418699432888(1999). Toward a unified theory of class, race, and gender. In S.Coontz (Ed.), American families: A multicultural reader (pp. 218–229). New York: Routledge.(1996). On the importance of kin relations to Canadian women and men. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 289–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0162-3095%2896%2900046-5, & (2004). Learning that an adolescent child is gay or lesbian: The parent experience. Social Work, 49, 109–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sw/49.1.109(2000). Coping efficacy and psychological problems of children of divorce. Child Development, 71, 1099–1118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00212, , , , & (1994). Coping, stress and the psychological symptoms of children of divorce: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Child Development, 65, 1744–1763. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131291, , & (1992). Grandparenthood and modernization: The changing status of male and female elders in Tiriki, Kenya, Irigwe, Nigeria. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 7(4), 331–361.(2001). Godparenthood ties among Zapotec women and the effects of Protestant conversion. In J. W.Dow & A. R.Sandstrom (Eds.), Holy saints and fiery preachers: The anthropology of Protestantism in Mexico and Central America (pp. 117–146). Westport, CT: Praeger.([Page 237]1997). Psychological correlates of affective distress: Models of male and female adolescents in a community. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 89–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024544329855, & (1998). Intergenerational support in families with disabilities: Grandparents’ perspectives. Families in Society, 79, 465–476., & (2003). A typological examination of stepfamily communication schemata. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.(The stepfamily life index: Development and validation of a new measure for stepfamily relationship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.(in press).2004). The divorce decree, communication, and the structuration of co-parenting relationships in stepfamilies. Manuscript submitted for publication., , , , & (1985). Approaches to the statistical analysis of family data. Home Economics Research Journal, 14, 112–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8501400111, , , , & (1983). Siblings and other kin. In T. H.Brubaker (Ed.), Family relationships in later life (pp. 47–62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1974). The effects of earlier parental loss in adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 31, 475–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760160027007(2004). Private disclosure from in-laws to newlyweds: Relationships among disclosure, family privacy orientations, and relational quality. Manuscript submitted for publication.(The difficulties of in-law relationships. In D. C.Kirkpatrick, S.Duck, & M.Foley (Eds.), Difficult relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(in press).1991). Former in-laws as a source of support. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 17(1/2), 67–90., , & (It's about pure love. Parade Magazine, pp. 6–7.(2002, May 12).2002). Becoming lesbian adoptive parents: An exploratory study of lesbian adoptive, lesbian birth and heterosexual adoptive parents. Adoption Quarterly, 6, 33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J145v06n01_04, & (2002). The man I might become: Gay men write about their fathers. New York: Marlowe & Company., & (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In W. P.Robinson & H.Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33–56). Chichester, England: Wiley., , & (1987). Swann. New York: Viking.(1984). Divided light: Father and son poems: A 20th century American anthology. New York: Sheep Meadow Press.(1995). Communication and family culture. In M. A.Fitzpatrick & A. L.Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 375–399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.([Page 238]1990). Adjustment in interracial adoptees: An overview. In D. M.Brodzinsky & M. D.Schechter (Eds.), The psychology of adoption (pp. 187–200). New York: Oxford University Press., & (1994). Toward an organizational-relational model of open adoption. Family Process, 33, 111–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00111.x, & (1990). The problem with in-laws. Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 399–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j..1992.00469.x(1999). The impact of acculturation in Mexican American families on the quality of adult grandparent-grandchild relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 188–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353893, & (2001). How Americans enact the grandparent role across the family life course. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 493–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251301022004006, & (1997). Attitudes toward public support of the elderly: Does early involvement with grandparents moderate generational tensions?Research on Aging, 19, 108–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0164027597191005, & (1993). Gender differences in the intergenerational transmission of parenting beliefs. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 823–836. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353164, , , & (2003). Grandparents living with grandchildren: 2000. Census 2000 Brief. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubsAc2kbr-31.pdf, & (2000). Adoption across borders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield., & (2000). Differental parental treatment predicts achievement and self-perception in two cultural contexts. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 491–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3188.8.131.521, & (1994). Benjamin and William Franklin: Father and son, patriot and loyalist. New York: Bedford Books.(1987). Inheritance of wealth as human kin investment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 171–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095%2887%2990042-2, , & (2004). Shared family identity, age salience, and intergroup contact: Investigation of the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.(2003). Communication in a family relationship and the reduction of intergroup prejudice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 320–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369681032000132582, & (2000). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. New York: Simon & Schuster.(2004, November). Rearticulating the aunt in popular culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago., & (1993). Good riddance to “the family”: A response to David Popenoe. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 545–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353335([Page 239]1999). The family values fable. In S.Coontz (Ed.), American families: A multicultural reader (pp. 487–490). New York: Routledge.(2003). Toward equal regard for marriages and other imperfect intimate affiliations. Hofstra Law Review, 32, 331–348.(1974). All our kin. New York: Basic Books.(1998). Kinscripts. In K. V.Hansen & A. I.Garey (Eds.), Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 405–115). Philadelphia: Temple University Press., & (2004). Theories of family relationships and a family relationships model. In A.Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2001). The final season: Fathers, sons, and one last season in a classic American ballpark. New York: Thomas Dunn Books.(1992). The nature and family correlates of preadolescents’ perceptions of their sibling relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 9, 179–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407592092002, & (1988). Black sheep and kissing cousins: How our family stories shape us. New York: Penguin Books.(2000). Kinship and gender: An introduction ((2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., & (Sturgis, I. (Ed.). (2004). Aunties: Thirty-five writers celebrate their other mother. New York: Ballantine Books.1993). The mother-daughter relationship: Themes in psychotherapy. In J.van Mens-Verhulst, J.Schreurs, & L.Woertman (Eds.), Daughtering and mothering: Female subjectivity reanalysed (pp. 114–124). New York: Routledge.(1962). Kin family network: Unheralded structure in current conceptualizations of family functioning. Marriage and Family Living, 24, 231–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/349136, & (1998). Handbook on grandparenthood. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S.Worchel & W.Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall., & (2003). Brave men, gentle heroes: American fathers and sons in World War II and Vietnam. New York: William Morrow.(2004). Intergroup contact and grandparent-grandchild communication: Do self-disclosure, anxiety, and empathy improve implicit and explicit attitudes toward the elderly? Unpublished manuscript, University of Oxford., , , & (2000). The changing demography of America's families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1234–1246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01234.x, , & ([Page 240]1999). West meets East: Americans adopt Chinese children. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey., , & (1998). Sibling relationships: Verbally aggressive messages and their effect on relational satisfaction. Communication Reports, 11, 179–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934219809367699, , & (1995). Perceptions of deception, divorce disclosures, and communication satisfaction with parents. Western Journal of Communication, 59, 228–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319509374519, , & (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley., & (1995). Perceptions of deception, divorce disclosures, and communication satisfaction with parents. Western Journal of Communication, 59, 228–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319509374519, , & (1999). The postdivorce family: An introduction to the issues. In R. A.Thompson & P. R.Amato (Eds.), The postdivorce family: Children, parenting, and society (pp. xi-xxiii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452234038, & (2000). Family ties and the discontinuity of divorce in black and white newlywed couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 349–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00349.x, & (2004). Boy trouble: Rhetorical framing of boys’ underachievement. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25, 145–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596300410001692120(2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford.(1998). Aunties: Our older, cooler, wiser friends. Berkeley, CA: Wildcat Canyon Press., & (2000). Nonverbal communication and the support process: Interactional sensitivity in interactions between mothers and young adult children. Communication Monographs, 67, 239–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376509(2000). Interpersonal communication (, & (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.1975). Early and middle adulthood. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.(1985). Early and middle adulthood ((2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.2004, December 2). Woody Guthrie's Jewish legacy. The Jerusalem Post, Arts Section, p. 24.(2003). Breaking through the silence: Increasing voice for diverse families in communication research. Journal of Family Communication, 3, 181–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0304_1, & (2006). Perspectives on family communication (, & (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.1998). Grandparenthood over time: Historical and demographic trends. In M. E.Szinovacz (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 23–39). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press., & (U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). Statistical abstract of the United States 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.[Page 241]U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1998). Statistical abstract of the United States 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Statistical abstract of the United States 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2002). U.S. population report [data file]. Available at http://www.dof.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/USCPS-2002.pdfU.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003a). Children's living arrangements and characteristics: March 2002 (Current population reports, Series P-20, No. 547). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003b). Table 2. Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to present. Retrieved August 9, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/tabMS-2.pdfU.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003c). Two married parents the norm. Retrieved August 21, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2003/cb03-97.htmlU.S. Department of Justice. (2002). Victim characteristics. Retrieved September 1, 2004, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_v.htm1994, August 20). Blended, extended, now all in the family. USA Today, pp. 1A, 3A.(van Mens-Verhulst, J., Schreurs, J., & Woertman, L. (Eds.). (1993). Daughtering and mothering: Female subjectivity reanalysed. New York: Routledge.1994). Family secrets: Forms, functions and correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 113–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407594111007(2001). Criteria for revealing family secrets. Communication Monographs, 68, 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750128052, , & (2003). When your father dies: How a man deals with the loss of his father. New York: Nelson Books., & (1979). Stepfamilies: A guide to working with stepparents and stepchildren. New York: Brunner/Mazel., & (2001). From grandparent to caregiver: The stress and satisfaction of raising grandchildren. The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 82, 461–472., & (1984). Children of divorce: Preliminary report of a 10-year follow-up of young children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 444–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1984.tb01510.x(1986). Father-child relationships after divorce: Child support and educational opportunity. Family Law Quarterly, 20, 109–128., & (1993). Conceptualization of normal family processes. In F.Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes ((2nd ed., pp. 3–69). New York: Guilford Press.1992). Twenty major issues in remarriage families. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 709–715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb02153.x(1992). Lives together, worlds apart. Berkeley: University of California Press.([Page 242]1997). Adoption identity and kinship: The debate over sealed birth records. New Haven: Yale University Press.(1998). Adoption and kinship. In K. V.Hansen & A. I.Garey (Eds.), Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 41–51). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.(1998). The place of kinfolk in personal community networks. In K. V.Hansen & A. I.Garey (Eds.), Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics (pp. 231–239). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.(1989). Brother's keepers: Situating kinship relations in broader networks of social support. Sociological Perspectives, 32, 273–306., & (2002). Disclosure of divorce plans to children: What the children have to say. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24, 525–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021271411917, , & (1996). Parent-adolescent dialogues about AIDS. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 343–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3184.108.40.2063, , , & (1999). Family communication. In M.Sussman, S. K.Stinmetz, & G. W.Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 687–704). New York: Plenum Press., & (1992a). Ties among adult siblings. Social Forces, 71, 85–102., & (1992b). When the Brady bunch grows up: Step/half-and full sibling relations in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 197–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353287, & (1985). Birth is more than once. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Sunrise Ventures.(1996). Intergenerational conversations: Young adults’ retrospective accounts. Human Communication Research, 23, 220–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00393.x, & (2004). Intergenerational communication: Intergroup, accommodation, and family perspectives. In J. F.Nussbaum & J.Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (, & (2nd ed., pp. 115–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.2001). Intergenerational communication across the lifespan. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., & (1995). The relational perspective. In W.Wilmot (Ed.), The relational communication reader ((4th ed., pp. 1–12). New York: McGraw-Hill.2000). Sharing the culture: Adult grandchildren's perceptions of intergenerational relations. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 51, 199–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/0UY5-MXXP-W81K-VXCU, & (2004). What gets dad involved? A longitudinal study of change in parental child caregiving involvement. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 237–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3220.127.116.11, & (1992). Gender and moral voice: Moving from woman's nature to standpoint epistemology. Women's Studies in Communication, 15, 1–24.([Page 243]1999). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.(2000). Relational communication: Continuity and change in personal relationships ((2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.2002). What's a family, anyway? In J.Stewart (Ed.), Bridges not walls: A book about interpersonal communication (pp. 375–383). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.(2004). Evolutionary psychology: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164757, & (2000). The communication of social support within an online community for older adults: A qualitative analysis of the SeniorNet community. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 1, 33–43.(2000). Vietnamese-Australian grandparenthood: The changing roles and psychological well-being. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 15, 265–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006777003250, & (2005). Envy is a family matter. Manuscript submitted for publication.(
About the Editors[Page 253]
Kory Floyd is Associate Professor of Human Communication, Director of the Communication Sciences Laboratory, and Director of the graduate M.A. program in Human Communication at Arizona State University. He holds a Ph.D. from the University of Arizona, an M.A. from the University of Washington, and a B.A. from Western Washington University. His research focuses on the communication of affection in families and other intimate relationships and on the interplay between communication, physiology, and health. He has written or edited five books and more than 60 journal articles and book chapters, is currently chair of the family communication division of the National Communication Association, and is currently editor of Journal of Family Communication.
Mark T. Morman is Associate Professor of Communication Studies at Baylor University, where he serves as faculty advisor for the Lambda Pi Eta communication honor society. He received his M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Kansas and his B.S. from Southern Utah University. His research focuses on affectionate communication within families and close relationships and on persuasive messages relevant to men's health issues. He has published several articles in both regional and national communication journals, is currently vice chair of the family communication division of the National Communication Association, and serves on the editorial boards of Journal of Family Communication and Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.[Page 254]
About the Contributors[Page 255]
Tamara D. (Golish) Afifi (Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences at Penn State University. Her research interests include information regulation (e.g., privacy, avoidance, secrets) in families and communication processes in families experiencing difficult life transitions. In particular, she is interested in communication characteristics that promote risk and resilience in postdivorce families.
Karen Anderson (Ph.D., University of Kansas) is Assistant Professor and Basic Course Director of Communication Studies at the University of North Texas. Her primary research area is intergenerational communication with a particular focus on age stereotypes, media representations of older adults, and the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Her recent work appears in Human Communication Research, Communication Reports, and Journal of Family Communication.
Leslie A. Baxter (Ph.D., University of Oregon) is F. Wendell Miller Distinguished Professor of Communication Studies at the University of Iowa. She has published four books and close to 100 articles and book chapters on family communication, relational communication, and research methods. Her scholarly awards include the Berscheid-Hatfield Award for Mid-Career Achievement (INPR), the Gerald R. Miller Book Award (NCA), the Franklin H. Knower Article Award (NCA), and the Legacy Theory Award (CSCA).
Dawn O. Braithwaite (Ph.D., University of Minnesota) is Professor of Communication Studies at University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Her research focuses on communication in personal and family relationships. She studies relational dialectics, rituals, and social support in the context of stepfamilies, elderly couples, and people with disabilities. She has published three books and 50 articles and chapters. She is past president of the Western [Page 256]States Communication Association and is the director of the Research Board of the National Communication Association.
Fran C. Dickson (Ph.D., Bowling Green State University) is Associate Professor and Chair of Human Communication Studies at the University of Denver. Her research focuses on communication and intimacy within later-life couples, communication and aging, and the later-life family member. She has published over 25 journal articles and book chapters and is a past chair of the Family Communication Division for the National Communication Association.
Laura L. Ellingson (Ph.D., University of South Florida) is Assistant Professor of Communication at Santa Clara University. Her research interests include health care provider-patient communication, interdisciplinary communication, health care teamwork, communication and gender, and feminist theory and methodology. She is the author of Communicating in the Clinic: Negotiating Frontstage and Backstage Teamwork (Hampton Press) and has published articles in Health Communication, Journal of Aging Studies, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Women's Studies in Communication, and Communication Studies. Currently, she is conducting an ethnography of team communication in a dialysis clinic.
Carla Fisher (M.A., Arizona State University West) is a doctoral student in communication arts and sciences at the Pennsylvania State University. Her primary research interests are in family communication with focuses on how communication in intergenerational relationships evolves over the life span and how families respond to change. A pilot study of the research discussed herein was presented at the 2004 Western Communication Association Conference in Albuquerque, NM.
Kathleen M. Galvin (Ph.D., Northwestern University) is Professor of Communication Studies at Northwestern University. Her research focuses on the communication patterns in adoptive families and the role of discourse in the identity development of families not fully formed through biological or adult legal ties. She is the senior author of Family Communication: Cohesion and Change, currently in its sixth edition. She has authored seven other books, developed a PBS teleclass in family communication, and serves on the editorial board of Journal of Family Communication.
Jake Harwood (Ph.D., University of California, Santa Barbara) is Professor of Communication and Chair of the Gerontology Program at the University of Arizona. His research focuses on intergroup communication with a [Page 257]particular focus on age groups and grandparent-grandchild relationships. He has published more than 50 articles in professional journals, with recent articles in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Communication, Journal of Applied Communication Research, and Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
Beth Le Poire (Ph.D., University of Arizona) is Professor of Communication at the University of California, Santa Barbara. She has published more than 40 journal articles and book chapters cutting across various areas of applied interpersonal research in the family, including the communication of stigma, early parental and subsequent romantic attachment, and the effects that partners of substance abusers can have on continued substance abuse. Recently, she has completed an editorship of Communication Reports, and she is currently the chair of the interpersonal division of the International Communication Association.
Mei-Chen Lin (Ph.D., University of Kansas) is Assistant Professor in the School of Communication Studies at Kent State University. Her research and teaching interests are in aging; group and intercultural communication, specifically communication and aging across cultures; age identity; intergenerational communication; and grandparent-grandchild relationships. Her research has appeared in Communication Monographs, Journal of Communication, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, and Journal of Aging Studies.
Tara McManus (M.A., University of Cincinnati) is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences at Penn State University. Her primary area of research is family communication, with an emphasis on relational maintenance during times of stress and uncertainty.
Alan C. Mikkelson (M.A., Arizona State University) is Assistant Professor of Communication Studies at Whitworth College. He holds an M.A. in human communication from Arizona State University and a B.A. in speech communication and religion from Whitworth College, and is currently completing his Ph.D. in human communication at Arizona State University. His current research focuses on the communication of closeness in adult sibling relationships.
Michelle Miller-Day (Ph.D., Arizona State University) is Associate Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences at the Pennsylvania State University. Her research focuses on interpersonal and family communication processes related to problem behaviors such as drug use and suicide. She has authored two books, the most recent titled Communication Among[Page 258]Grandmothers, Mothers, and Adult Daughters: A Qualitative Study of Maternal Relationships (Lawrence Erlbaum).
Mary Claire Morr Serewicz (Ph.D., Arizona State University) is Assistant Professor of Human Communication Studies at the University of Denver. Her research focuses on in-law relationships, privacy, and the initiation of romantic relationships. Her work has been published in journals including Communication Monographs, Communication Research, and Communication Quarterly.
Paul Schrodt (Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is Assistant Professor of Communication at the University of Kansas. He specializes in family and relational communication and instructional communication. His research explores communication cognitions and behaviors that facilitate family functioning, specifically examining co-parenting and stepparenting relationships in stepfamilies and the associations among family communication schemata and family functioning. His research has appeared in Human Communication Research, Communication Monographs, and Communication Education.
Jordan Eli Soliz (Ph.D., University of Kansas) is Assistant Professor of Communication Studies at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. His teaching and research interests are in interpersonal and family communication, with an emphasis on intergenerational interactions, intergroup and intercultural dynamics within the family, group differences in supportive interactions, and communication and intergroup prejudice. His research has appeared in the Journal of Applied Communication Research.
Patricia J. Sotirin (Ph.D., Purdue University) is Associate Professor of Communication at Michigan Technological University. Her research focuses on relational communication, gender, and work. She has published in such journals as Women & Language, Text and Performance Quarterly, and Organization.
Lynn H. Turner (Ph.D., Northwestern University) is Professor of Communication Studies at Marquette University. Her research areas of interest include interpersonal, gendered, and family communication. She is the coauthor or co-editor of more than 10 books as well as several articles and book chapters. She has served in a number of different positions: director of graduate studies for the College of Communication at Marquette University; president of the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language, and Gender; president of Central States Communication Association; and chair of the Family Communication Division for the National Communication Association.
Anita L. Vangelisti (Ph.D., University of Texas at Austin) is Professor in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Texas at Austin. [Page 259]She is interested in interpersonal communication among family members and between romantic partners. She is co-editor of the Cambridge University Press book series on advances in personal relationships, was associate editor of Personal Relationships, and has served on the editorial boards of numerous journals. Dr. Vangelisti has coauthored and edited several books and is presently working on two more volumes.
Richard West (Ph.D., Ohio University) is Professor and Chair of the Department of Communication and Media Studies at the University of Southern Maine. His research seeks to understand the intersection of family communication, classroom communication, and culture. Rich is the coauthor of several book chapters, articles, and books, and he serves as an editorial board member for a number of communication journals. He has served as chair of the Instructional Development Division and is director-elect of the Educational Policies Board for the National Communication Association. He is also the president-elect of the Eastern Communication Association. Rich is the recipient of the Outstanding Alumni Awards from both Illinois State University and Ohio University.
Christina G. Yoshimura (Ph.D., Arizona State University) is Adjunct Assistant Professor of Interpersonal Communication at the University of Montana. Her research interests address the communication behaviors used by families in response to challenging dynamics such as maintenance of the work/family tension and the entrance or exit of family members.