Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism
Publication Year: 2010
For more than thirty years neoliberalism has declared that market functioning trumps all other social, political, and economic values. In this book, Nick Couldry passionately argues for voice, the effective opportunity for people to speak and be heard on what affects their lives, as the only value that can truly challenge neoliberal politics. But having voice is not enough: we need to know our voice matters. Insisting that the answer goes much deeper than simply calling for ‘more voices’, whether on the streets or in the media, Couldry presents a dazzling range of analysis from the real world of Blair and Obama to the social theory of Judith Butler and Amartya Sen.
Why Voice Matters breaks open the contradictions in neoliberal thought and shows how the ...
- Front Matter
- Back Matter
- Subject Index
© Nick Couldry 2010
First published 2010
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers.
SAGE Publications Ltd
1 Oliver's Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
SAGE Publications Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
New Delhi 110 044
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd
33 Pekin Street #02-01
Far East Square
Jean and John Comaroff, ‘Millennial Capitalism: First Thoughts on a Second Coming’, in Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of Neoliberalism, pp. 31. Copyright, 2001, Duke University Press. All rights reserved. Used by permission of the publisher.
The excerpt from The Unnameable, translation copyright © 1958 by the Estate of Samuel Beckett. Used by permission of Grove/Atlantic, Inc. [and (for UK rights) Faber and Faber].
Library of Congress Control Number: 2009940424
British Library Cataloguing in Publication data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-1-84860-662-3 (pbk)
Typeset by C&M Digitals (P) Ltd, Chennai, India
Printed by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham, Wiltshire
Printed on paper from sustainable resources
In memory of my mother, Lilian Couldry (1921–2006)
‘The thing to avoid, I don't know why, is the spirit of system.’Samuel Beckett1
‘We can hope for something better than the humanization of the inevitable.’Roberto Mangabeira Unger2
‘Only a crisis – actual or perceived – produces real change. When this crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around. That, I believe, is our basic function: to develop alternatives to existing policies, to keep them alive and available until the politically impossible becomes politically inevitable.’Milton Friedman3
Preface and Acknowledgements[Page vi]
As Milton Friedman acknowledged more than 25 years ago, major crises can precipitate major shifts in thinking.4 In autumn 2008 the world faced a deep financial crisis, the long-term economic, social and political consequences of which are, and will continue to be, most serious. The causes of that financial crisis derive directly from the implementation and normalization of the neoliberal doctrines with which Friedman was so closely associated. While reports of the death of neoliberalism are surely exaggerated, we can at least ask whether a new shift in thinking will now occur. Only, following Friedman's insight, if the ideas that articulate those shifts are ‘lying around’. This book aims to make a modest contribution to that pool of ideas.
The basis of that contribution lies in affirming the value of voice in response to the parallel crisis of voice that is inseparable from the long ascendancy of neoliberal discourse. Voice as a process – giving an account of oneself and what affects one's life – is an irreducible part of what it means to be human; effective voice (the effective opportunity to have one's voice heard and taken into account) is a human good. ‘Voice’ might therefore appear unquestionable as a value. But across various domains – economic, political, cultural – we are governed in ways that deny the value of voice and insist instead on the primacy of market functioning. Part of this crisis of voice is our own hesitancy in invoking the value of voice to challenge, even identify, such rules as voice-denying. Identifying this crisis and reviewing the resources that might help us think beyond it are the aims of this book.
The resulting story gains some general interest, I hope, from neoliberal discourse's own pretence to normative universality. However, the story told here could be told in radically different ways, depending on what position in global power hierarchies provides its context, for example from China whose millennia-long centralization of power in the state now meets the more recent rise of a huge Chinese working class,5 or from countries where neoliberal discourse was violently imposed as a condition of multilateral external finance, whether in Latin America6 or (with the added burden of a racist colonial history) in Africa.7
Instead I am writing this book from Britain. In spite of the obvious limitations, there are some good reasons for telling this story from here. Britain was not only one of the sites where neoliberal doctrine found an enthusiastic home in the late 1970s; it is also one of the developed countries most shaken by the current economic crisis. My reading and writing for this book began in [Page vii]early 2007 but the surrounding context has changed rapidly: a global financial crisis, the emergence of Barack Obama as a credible challenger to the neoconservative regime of George W. Bush, Tony Blair's accelerated resignation as UK Prime Minister in mid 2007. The particular clarity in Britain of neoliberal democracy's contradictions still offers a salutary tale of what is wrong with neoliberalism.
Thanks to my colleagues in Goldsmiths’ Department of Media and Communications and Centre for the Study of Global Media and Democracy for providing a congenial home in which to write this book. Thanks to three institutions that hosted me during periods of working on this book: the Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Toulouse, University of Toulouse; the Department of Communication, Business and Information Technologies, Roskilde University, Denmark; and above all Barbie Zelizer and the Scholars Program in Culture and Communication at the Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, my hosts during the fall semester of 2008. Thanks also to two networks from which I have derived regular inspiration: the NYLON doctoral research network led by Richard Sennett and Craig Calhoun, and the Mediatized Stories network funded by the Research Council of Norway and led by Knut Lundby of University of Oslo.
I am very grateful to Mila Steele, my commissioning editor at Sage, for her enthusiasm and support for the book's project since summer 2007. Among the friends who have given me needed encouragement in the conceiving and writing of this book, I want to single out Henry Giroux, Jeremy Gilbert, Dave Hesmondhalgh, Jo Littler and Clemencia Rodriguez, for support and inspiration over many years; Jeremy Gilbert specifically for a trenchant and timely criticism of an earlier version of Chapter Five; Robin Mansell for inspiring the engagement with economics, and particularly the work of Amartya Sen, that led eventually to Chapter Two; and Sarah Banet-Weiser for the inspiration (even after my manuscript was submitted) of a talk on her latest work on ‘self-branding’. Stephen Coleman, James Curran, Melissa Gregg, Kate Nash, Angela McRobbie and Bruce Williams all generously gave their time to comment on chapter drafts. Thanks to audiences at ANZCA 2009 (held at QUT, Brisbane, Australia), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, and Nottingham University, UK, for their responses to earlier versions of my argument. Thanks to colleagues in Australia (Bob Lingard, Jo Tacchi, Tanja Dreher) for alerting me to important references that I might have missed. The responsibility for any remaining errors and confusions is mine alone.
Chapter Four reproduces material originally published as part of ‘Reality TV, or the Secret Theatre of Neoliberalism’ in The Review of Education, Pedogogy and Cultural Studies (2008) 30(1): 1–13; thanks to Taylor & Francis for permitting this republication. Thanks also to Duke University Press, Grove/Atlantic, Inc., Hart Publishing, Verso, and Faber and Faber for permission to quote copyright material in the book's and its chapters’ epigraphs.
[Page viii]My deepest thanks as ever to my wife Louise Edwards for her love and support, without which this book could never have been written.
This is a book not only about voice, but also about what happens when voice is missing or obstructed: the hope of voice can never be separated from the threat of silence. I dedicate this book to the dear memory of my mother, Lilian Couldry who, through her deafness later in life, endured much silence.NICK COULDRY, LONDON, SEPTEMBER 2009Notes
1 Beckett (1975: 8).
2 Unger (1998: 28).
3 Friedman (1982: ix).
4 See note 3. Naomi Klein (2007: 6) uses this quote too.
5 Qiu (2009).
6 Unger (1998).
7 Mbembe (2001: 73–77).
Background Note[Page 153]
Chapter endnotes give bibliographical references only. A few longer background comments are collected here.
In introducing ‘voice’ in this chapter, I defer until Chapter 5 to the philosophical debates that the term automatically raises from post-structuralist perspectives, including my defence of using the term notwithstanding Derrida's (1976) association of it with a discredited ‘metaphysics of self-presence’. Thanks to my colleague Les Back for alerting me to the wider relevance of Jonathan Lear's work. Charles Taylor's review (2007: 8) of Lear also takes up the invitation of considering applications of Lear's argument beyond the exceptional circumstances of Native Americans.
This book's argument to some extent runs in parallel with work on voice around development and poverty (Deane 2004; Lister 2004; Appadurai 2004), from which some interesting connections have been made to voice in politics in ‘developed’ countries by Cornwall (2008).
With regard to the issue of the underlying complex variations of the policy frameworks that, for strategic purposes, I am simply calling ‘neoliberal’, see generally Harvey (2005: chapter 3) and specifically Stephen Ball's study of the transition from Thatcherite ‘neoliberal’ to Blairite ‘post-neoliberal’ or ‘Third Way’ policy in the UK education sector (Ball 2007: especially chapter 9). It is the degree of continuity implied by Ball's term ‘post-neoliberal’ that is my focus in this book. My own use of that term in Chapter 7 will be different.
For literature debating explanations of the current financial crisis, see Blackburn (2008), Wade (2008), Madrick (2009), Panitch and Konings (2009). A rare insight into arguments behind the scenes on issues of global banking regulation came when The Guardian on 17 January 2009 reported on its front page that in response to Presidents Merkel and Sarkozy, the UK Chancellor Alistair Darling had written to G20 finance ministers saying ‘any clampdown had to start from the belief that markets were a force for good’. The UK government's subsequent weakness in dealing with the issue of banking regulation has confirmed the tight grip that neoliberal thinking has on it.
[Page 154]Note that, while I find Thomas Frank's account of US market populism and its surprising links to UK New Labour illuminating, I would distance myself from other aspects of his account (for example, his discussion of the supposed politics of ‘cultural studies’).
The terms ‘ideology’ and ‘hegemony’ require much longer discussion than I can give here. Boltanski and Chiapello retain the term ‘ideology’ but in a sense far from Marx's original sense and closer to the term hegemony (see also Chapter One above). My suggestion – that neoliberalism is both broad hegemonic discourse yet generates offshoots that work more straightforwardly as ideology for specific ends – is, I believe, compatible with their account.
Behind this chapter's discussion of work lies a major debate on shifts towards ‘immaterial’ and ‘affective’ labour, influenced particularly by Italian theory. While aspects of such debates (the argument that all wage labour is now ‘flexible’ (Virno 2004: 101) and increasingly ‘precarious’) capture an important dimension of neoliberal work cultures, other aspects (the emphasis on ‘affective’, even ‘immaterial’ labour) seem to ignore crucial distinctions between different types of work and work-based power/status (see Hesmondhalgh and Baker (2008), Ross (2008) for critical discussion). Still wider debates about the revolutionary potential of ‘precarity’ as a general identity-category, or of refusing work entirely, lie outside the scope of my argument here; while I accept the importance of the task of finding new ways of producing ‘the common’ (Hardt and Negri 2006: xv; Neilson and Rossiter 2008), I am not convinced that recent accounts of the changing conditions of contemporary labour yet offer a convincing route towards cross-class, cross-continental social organization (see Gill and Pratt 2008: 9–13, 15–17 for useful discussion).
A recent OFCOM survey of civic-related Internet use (OFCOM 2009) provides a more upbeat assessment of the state of UK democracy than I do, but in my view exaggerates the degree of citizen action online in the UK through its broad definitions and insufficient attention to questions of frequency. The decline of trust in UK politics is, however, part of a long historical trend in Western democracies (Pharr, Putnam and Dalton 2000).
The chapter's argument about the ‘cultural’ implementation of neoliberal discourse and policy priorities on the ground takes account of important debates in economic sociology on what are the processes that enable the boundaries of ‘the economy’ and practical economic reasoning to be constructed, normalized and occasionally shifted (Barry and Slater 2002).
In relation to the socioeconomic statistics quoted in the chapter, for the rise in income inequality in the UK, see http://www.statistics.gov.uk, search under ‘income inequality’ (last accessed 29 April 2008); on the geographical distribution of suicide rates, see http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=13618, and go to link on Corrected Geographical suicide rates (last accessed 22 January 2009). For international comparative purposes, a useful collation of [Page 155]statistics can be found on the excellent Worldmapper site run by University of Sheffield: http://www.sasi.group.shef.ac.uk/149worldmapper/data_data.xls
The UK government has attempted to appear more responsive by allowing e-petitions to the website of the Prime Minister (http://petitions.number10.gov.uk). At the beginning of September 2009, that site listed 32,000 rejected petitions, 24,000 completed petitions (each with a response) and 4,500 current petitions. The impact of such petitions on UK politics would appear so far to have been negligible.
The account of recognition offered in this chapter follows Axel Honneth's (2007) account, rather than Charles Taylor's (1989) account, partly in light of Lois McNay's (2008) recent critique of the latter
Changing Rooms is no longer on air after a long run; Trinny and Susanna after five BBC seasons was followed in October 2006 by the ITV series Trinny and Susanna Undress. I discuss reality TV in more detail in Couldry (2003, 2004, 2006).
Another link to neoliberalism from reality television not considered in the chapter is the production cultures that underlie such programmes and their harsh labour regimes (see Grindstaff 2002; Hesmondhalgh and Baker 2008). For a brilliant account of the more extreme atrophy of public culture in neoliberal USA, see Giroux (2008).
While this chapter considers various philosophical approaches to voice, it makes no claim to be comprehensive, focusing on those which fit best into the broadly political focus of this book. I do not discuss, for example, a recent Lacanian treatment of ‘voice’ which defines it as ‘the material element recalcitrant to meaning’ (Dolar 2006: 15).
My discussion of the ‘subject in this chapter draws on and develops an earlier treatment which also reviews a range of cultural studies’ writing about the self: see Couldry (2000: chapters 3 and 6). My approach here does not represent the mainstream of cultural studies but has parallels in some other writers, for example Probyn (1993: 17–22); Pickering (1997: 43–45). In a helpful recent essay, Gregory Seigworth (2008) makes interesting links between the recent fashion for Deleuze and Raymond Williams’ discussion of experience, also quoted here.
In drawing both on Charles Taylor and Pierre Ricoeur on narrative, there is no space here to discuss the difference of emphasis between their two lines of argument. But contrast Taylor (‘because we have to determine our place in relation to the good, therefore we cannot be without an orientation to it, and hence must see our life in story’: 1989: 52) with Ricoeur (‘time becomes human time to the extent that it is organized after the manner of a narrative’: 1984a: 3, emphasis added).
On Sen, we can apply his theory of capabilities to the distribution of media resources: for pioneering accounts see Garnham (1999), Mansell (2002).
[Page 156]In emphasizing the human universality of certain forms of life, I am broaching language that post-structuralism, particularly in its anti- or post-humanist strands, has avoided. But once we make this point explicit, there may be other gains, for example the recognition of certain ‘non-relative’ ends of humanity with wider relevance for ethics (Nussbaum 1993), leading us back to Sen's account of capabilities (1999: 24).
My use of Wittgenstein in the last section of this chapter could no doubt be developed further, and Norval's work here is particularly helpful. Whether, however, we can talk of the historically specific institution of democracy as a ‘form of life’ (Norval 2007: 185), I am not sure, but my argument does not depend on this. I freely acknowledge the broader difficulty of staying with Wittgenstein's minimal vision of what philosophy knows, on which see McDowell (1998: 60–61), discussing Cavell (1976: 52). That difficulty is the point of the vigilance towards our language and rhetoric on which Derrida's version of post-structuralism rightly insists. But Wittgenstein in important ways enables us to go beyond some of the formulations of post-structuralism.
For an earlier discussion of some of the approaches to voice discussed in this chapter, see Couldry (2000: chapter 3).
This chapter reaches rather different conclusions from Henry Jenkins’ suggestive account of the political potential of ‘convergence culture’, an account whose broader sociological relevance is limited in my view by its being based largely (as Jenkins, to his credit, admits) on evidence from what small groups of white, middle-class, young, time-rich fans of particular sorts of popular entertainment do (Jenkins 2006: 23).
My use of the word ‘articulated’ in this chapter is intended to refer to how practices are combined into larger habits and patterns (cf. Couldry, Livingstone and Markham 2007: chapter 4).
The chapter's discussion of ‘new acts’ for the building of ‘post-neoliberal politics’ is meant only to be suggestive, but it is inspired in part by the more concrete attempt recently of Peter Dahlgren to develop a new, more dynamic model of the elements of ‘civic culture’ (Dahlgren 2003, 2009).
The chapter's concluding call for ‘another story’ of what democracy is about takes some inspiration from Jacques Derrida's invocation of a ‘democracy to come’ (1997: 306): see Norval (2007: 145–148) for discussion. A difference, however, is that the horizon of action discussed here takes its shape not from the openness inherent to all language (that rhetoric always works to close down), but from the specific organizational failures of our neoliberal past and the specific challenges of a possible post-neoliberal future.
References[Page 157]Government and Civil Society ReportsBank of International Settlements (2009) Press Release on 79th Annual Report, 29 June, http://www.bis.org/press/p090629.htm (last accessed 30 June 2009).BBC (2004) ‘Sir Alan Sugar confirmed for BBC Two's The Apprentice’, 18 May, http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases (last accessed 26 April 2008).Chartered Institute of Personnel Development (2008) Factsheet, http://www.cipd.cp.uk/subjects/hrpact/hoursandholidays/ukworkhrs (last accessed 7 March 2009).Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (2008) Issues Paper, http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/Issues_paper.pdf (last accessed 3 February 2009).Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (2009) Report, http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf (last accessed 21 September 2009).[UK] Department of Communities and Local Government (2008) Communities in Control: Real People, Real Power, http://www.clg.gov.uk (last accessed 18 August 2008).[UK] Department of Culture Media and Sport (2009) Digital Britain Final Report, http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/digitalbritain-finalreport-jun09.pdf (last accessed 8 August 2009).[UK] Department of Health (2006a) A Stronger Local Voice, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4137041.pdf (last accessed 17 August 2009).[UK] Department of Health (2006b) Our Health, Our Choice, Our Say, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4127459.pdf (last accessed 17 August 2009).Electoral Commission (2004) Political Engagement Among Young People: An Update. London: Electoral Commission.Electoral Commission (2005) Election 2005: Turnout. How Many, Who and Why?London: Electoral Commission.Electoral Commission (2007) An Audit of Political Engagement 4. London: Electoral Commission.Hansard Society, The (2008) An Audit of Political Engagement 5. London: Hansard Society.House of Commons Select Committee on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004) Ninth Report, 12 July, http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmodpm/402/40204.htm (last accessed 7 March 2009).House of Lords (2009) Surveillance: Citizens and the State. Select Committee on the Constitution, Volume 1. House of Lords Paper 18-I, February.[Page 158]International Monetary Fund (2009) The State of Public Finances: Outlook and Medium-term Policies after the 2008 Crisis, March, http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2009/030609.pdf (last accessed 7 March 2009).Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2009a) Ending Child Poverty in a Changing Economy. York: JRF, http://www.jrf.org.uk (last accessed 15 February 2009).Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2009b) Modern Social Evils. Bristol: The Policy Press.Power (2006) The Report of Power: An Independent Inquiry into Britain's Democracy, http://www.powerinquiry.org/report/index.php (last accessed 15 May 2009).National Centre for Social Research (2006) British Social Attitudes: The 23rd Report. Aldershot: Gower.OFCOM (2009) Citizens’ Digital Participation, March, http://www.ofcom.org.uk (last accessed 15 May 2009).Office for National Statistics (2004) The Health of Children and Young People, March. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CHILDREN/ (last accessed 15 May 2009).The Primary Review (2007) Community Soundings: The Primary Review Regional Witness Sessions, November, http://www.primaryreview.org.uk (last accessed 15 May 2009).The Primary Review (2009) Towards a New Curriculum, February, http://www.primaryreview.org.uk (last accessed 15 February 2009).UNCTAD (2007) World Investment Report, http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp? intItemID=3277&lang=1 (last accessed 3 March 2009).UNDP (2007 and 2008) Human Development Reports, http://www.undp.org (last accessed 3 March 2009).UNICEF (2007) Child Poverty in Perspective: An Overview of Child Well-Being in Rich Countries, http://www.unicef.org/irc (last accessed 3 March 2009).World Bank (2009) Global Economic Turmoil Having Dramatic Effects on Developing Countries (press release), http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,contentMDK:22216950~pagePK:64257043~piPK:437376~theSitePK:4607,00.html (last accessed 28 August 2009).World Health Organization (2008) World Health Statistics, http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2008/en/index.html (last accessed 3 March 2009).Academic and Media References1998) Homo Sacer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.(2005) State of Exception. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(1998) ‘Capitalism at the turn of the century’, New Left Review232: 41–90.(2006) The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162509.001.0001(1994) On Aging. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.(2004) Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.(2004) ‘The capacity to aspire: culture and the terms of recognition’, in V.Rao and M.Walton (eds), Culture and Public Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 59–84.(1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(2004 ) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.(Aristotle (1992) Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.1963) ‘Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care’, The American Economic Review53(5).(2005) Metapolitics. London: Verso.([Page 159]2007) The Art of Listening. Oxford: Berg.(2007) ‘Goodbye to newspapers’, New York Review of Books 16 August: 24–27.(2004) We the People of Europe?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(2007) Education plc. London: Routledge.(AuthenticTM. New York: New York University Press.(forthcoming)1996) ‘Introduction’, in A.Barry, T.Osborne and N.Rose (eds), Foucault and Political Reason. London: UCL Press, pp. 1–18., and (2002) ‘Introduction: the technological economy’, Economy and Society21(2): 175–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123117and (2007) The Arc and the Machine. Manchester: Manchester University Press.(1989) Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity.(1999) In Search of Politics. Cambridge: Polity.(2001) The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity.(1992) Risk Society. London: Sage.(1997) The Reinvention of Politics. Cambridge: Polity.(2000a) Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity.(2000b) ‘The cosmopolitan perspective: sociology of the second age of modernity’, British Journal of Sociology51(1): 79–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/000713100358444(1991) A Treatise on the Family (Enlarged edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1975) The Unnameable. London: Calder & Boyars.(2006) Historicising Lifestyle. Guildford: Ashgate.and (2004) The Rights of Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790799(1987) The Control Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1998) The Shadow of the Other. New York: Routledge.(1968) ‘The Storyteller’, in Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 83–110.(2006) The Wealth of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1998) ‘The Uncivic Culture: communication, identity and the rise of lifestyle politics’, PS: Political Science and Politics31(4): 740–741. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/420711(2003) ‘Communicating global activism’, Information Communication and Society6(2): 143–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118032000093860a(1991 ) Matter and Memory. New York: Zone Books.(1958) Two Concepts of Liberty. Clarendon Press: Oxford.(1982) ‘Stories as clues to sociological understanding’, in P.Thompson (ed.), Our Common History. London: Pluto Press, pp. 94–108.(2001) ‘Between Integration and Exclusion: European Households in Situations of Precariousness’, Keynote address to biennial conference of the European Sociological Association, Helsinki, 1 September 2001.(1996) The Dissonance of Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(2008) ‘The subprime crisis’, New Left Review (ns) 50: 63–108.(2009) ‘This lays bare the human crisis’, The Guardian 13 August.(1989) A Truer Liberty. New York: Routledge.and (1992) The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1979) The View in Winter. London: Allen Lane.(2003) The Shield of Achilles. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(2000) ‘The division of labour in democratic discourse’, in S.Chambers and A.Costain (eds), Deliberation, Democracy and the Media. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 47–64.([Page 160]2007) Democracy across Borders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1989 ) The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Bantam.(2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.and (2006) On Justification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.and (1961) The Image. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.(1990) Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.(1998) Acts of Resistance. New York: New Press.(1999) The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity.(Brewer, J. and Porter, R. (eds) (1993) Consumption and the World of Goods. London: Routledge.2003) ‘Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy’, Theory & Event7(1): 1–23.(1986) Actual Minds Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2005) ‘Introduction’, in L.Bruni and P.Porta (eds), Economics and Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286280.003.0001and (2008) Broadcasting, Voice, and Accountability: A Public Interest Approach to Policy, Law, and Regulation. New York: World Bank Press and the University of Michigan Press., , and and (2004) Willing Slaves. London: HarperCollins.(2008) ‘From buses to blogs: a pathological individualism is poisoning public life’, The Guardian 28 January.(2009) Again social evils haunt Britain: do we still have the spirit to thwart them?’, The Guardian 15 June.(1996) ‘Liberal government and techniques of the self’, in A.Barry, T.Osborne and N.Rose (eds), Foucault and Political Reason. London: UCL Press, pp. 19–36.(2009) YouTube. Cambridge: Polity.and (1990) Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.(1993) Bodies That Matter. New York: Routledge.(1997) Excitable Speech. New York: Routledge.(2004) Precarious Life. London: Verso.(2005) Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823225033.001.0001(2008) ‘The future of the “race”: identity, discourse and the rise of computermediated spheres’, in A.Everett (ed.), Learning Race and Ethnicity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15–38.(2009) ‘People now see the state as enemy instead of ally. We need a massive, radical redistribution of power’, The Guardian 26 May.(2009) Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2007) Mobile Communications and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., , and (2000) Relating Narratives. London: Routledge.(1976) Must We Mean What We Say?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2006) Internet Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2009) ‘This unexpected radical shows up an abject failure to tame the banks’, The Guardian 28 August.(2000) Rational Lives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2004) Changing Welfare, Changing States. London: Sage.([Page 161]2009) Public Media 2.0: Dynamic Engaged Publics, http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/resources/publications/public_media_2_0_dynamic_engaged_publics/ (last accessed 14 September 2009).and (1994) Self-consciousness. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203418987(2003) A Consumer's Republic. New York: Alfred Knopf.(2005) ’What Bush wants to hear’, New York Review of Books, 17 November: 8–12.(2006) ‘How to skip the Constitution’, New York Review of Books, 16 November: 20–22.(2009) ’What to do about the torturers’, New York Review of Books, 15 January: 20–24.(2003) A Tale of Two Houses: the House of Commons, the Big Brother house and the people at home’, Parliamentary Affairs56(4): 733–758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsg113(2005) ‘The lonely citizen: indirect representation in an age of networks’, Political Communication22(2): 197–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933197(2008) ‘Blogs and the politics of listening’, Political Quarterly76(2): 272–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2005.00679.x(2001) ‘Milennial capitalism: first thoughts on a second coming’, in J.Comaroff and J.Comaroff (eds), Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of Neoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–56.and (2002) ‘Performing the real: documentary diversions’, Television and New Media3(3): 255–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152747640200300302(2008) Democratising Engagement: What the UK Can Learn from International Experience. London: Demos.(1996) ‘Speaking about others and speaking personally’, Cultural Studies10(2): 315–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502389600490191(2000) Inside Culture. London: Sage.(2001) ‘The hidden injuries of media power’, Journal of Consumer Culture1(2): 155–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146954050100100203(2003) Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge.(2004) ‘Teaching us to fake it: the ritualised norms of television's “reality” games’, in S.Murray and L.Ouellette (eds), Reality TV: Remaking of Television Culture. New York: New York University Press, pp. 57–74.(2006) ‘La téléréalité ou le théatre du néoliberalisme’, Hermès44: 121–128.(‘Work, power and performance: analyzing the “reality” game of The Apprentice’, Cultural Sociology.and (forthcoming)2007) Media Consumption and Public Engagement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230800823, and (1992) ‘Nomos and narrative’, in M.Minow, M.Ryan and A.Sarat (eds), Narrative, Violence and the Law. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 95–172.(1998) Experiencing Identity. London: Sage.(2000) Coping with Post-democracy. London: Fabian Society.(1975) The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press., and (2009) Building the Good Society. London: Compass. Also available at: http://www.goodsociety.eu/ (last accessed 28 August 2009).and (2010) ‘Becoming extra-ordinary: negotiation of media power in the case of Super Girls’ Voice in China’, Popular Communication, 8(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2010.512829and (forthcoming2003) Power without Responsibility (and ([Page 162]3rdedition). London: Arnold.1995) Television and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge.(2003) ‘Reconfiguring civic culture in the New Media Milieu’, in J.Corner and D.Pels (eds), Media and the Restyling of Politics. London: Sage, pp. 151–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216804(2009) Media and Political Engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(2007) Flat Earth News. London: Chatto & Windus.(2004) ‘The Context of Communication for Development, 2004’, Paper prepared for 9th United Nations Roundtable on Communication for Development, 6–9 September 2004, FAO, Rome, Italy.(1988) A Thousand Plateaus. London: Athlone Press.and (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.and (2001) ‘Let us infotain you’, in L.Bennett and R.Entman (eds), Mediated Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 160–181.and (1973) Speech and Phenomena. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.(1976) Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.(1991 ) ‘Signature event context’, in P.Kamuf (ed.), A Derrida Reader. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.(1997) Politics of Friendship. London: Verso.(1946) The Public and its Problems. Chicago: Gateway.(1993) The Political Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett.(1987) Logics of Disintegration. London: Verso.(2006) ‘Cheney: the fatal touch’, New York Review of Books 5 October: 51–56.(2006) A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.(1994) ‘The system, the actor and the social subject’, Thesis Eleven38: 16–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/072551369403800103(1995) ‘Sociologie du sujet et sociologies de l'expérience’, in F.Dubet and M.Wieviorka (eds), Penser le Sujet. Paris: Fayard, pp. 103–121.(1985) ‘A modified view of our origins: the Christian beginnings of modern individualism’, in M.Carrithers, S.Collins and S.Lukes (eds), The Category of the Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–122.(1997) ‘Bloody footprints: reflections on growing up poor white’, in M.Wray and A.Newitz (eds), White Trash. New York: Routledge.(2006 ) On Suicide. Penguin: Harmondsworth.(2005) Come Hell or High Water: Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster. New York: Basic Books.(1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.(2009) ‘Map of the week: trust and belonging’, http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/2009/01/map_of_the_week_trust_and_belo.html? page=19 (last accessed 20 June 2009).(1995) L'Individu Incertain. Paris: Hachette.(1998) La Fatigue d'être soi. Paris: Odile Jacob.(2002) Nickel and Dimed. London: Granta.(1998) Avoiding Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583391(2009a) ‘Its not bankers Labour is watching, it's you’, The Guardian 11 May.(2009b) ‘The softly-softly slope’, The Guardian 18 June.(2008) Preempting Dissent. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring Publishing.and (1985) Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.([Page 163]1986) Black Skin White Masks. London: Pluto Press.(Fenton, N. (ed.) (2009) New Media, Old News: Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age. Sage: London.1998) Reflexive Authenticity. London: Routledge.(‘Financialisation, financial literacy and asset-based welfare’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations11(3).(forthcoming)1966) The Ancient Greeks. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.(1997) ‘Storying the self’, in H.Mackay (ed.), Consumption and Everyday Life. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, pp. 69–102.(2009) ‘The citizen's voice: Albert Hirschman's exit voice and loyalty and its contribution to media citizenship debates’, Media Culture & Society, 31(4): 978–995.(2005) British Government in Crisis. Oxford: Hart Publishing.(2008) The Birth of Biopolitics. Basingstoke: Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230594180(1991) The Wounded Storyteller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2001) One Market under God. London: Secker and Warburg.(2000) ‘Rethinking recognition’, New Left Review (ns) 3: 107–120.(2005) ‘Reframing global justice’, New Left Review (ns) 36: 69–90.(2007) ‘Transnationalizing the Public Sphere’Theory Culture & Society24(4): 7–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080090(2009) ‘Feminism co-opted’, New Left Review (ns) 56: 97–118.(1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(1982) Capitalism and Freedom ((2ndedition). Chicago: Chicago University Press.2001) Threads of Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(2009) A Public Voice: Access, Digital Story and Interactive Narrative, http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/knowledgeexchange/glamorgan.pdf (last accessed 4 September 2009)., , , and (1991) Subjectivities: A History of Self-Representation in Britain 1832–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1999) ‘Amartya Sen's “Capabilities” approach to the evaluation of welfare: its application to communications’, in A.Calabrese and J.-C.Burgelman (eds), Communication, Citizenship and Social Policy. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 113–124.(2007) Creative Explorations. London: Routledge.(1980) Narrative Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.(2006) A Post-Capitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.(1991) Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.(1998) The Third Way. Cambridge: Polity Press.(2008) Anticapitalism and Culture. Oxford: Berg.(2009) ‘Postmodernity and the crisis of democracy’, 28 May, http://www.opendemocracy.net (last accessed 28 May 2009).(2009) ‘Record level of inequality hits Labour's image’, Financial Times 8 May.(2009) ‘Post-feminist Media Culture: elements of a sensibility’, European Journal of Cultural Studies10: 147–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898(2008) ‘In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work’, Theory Culture & Society25(7–8): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097794and (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1996) Small Acts. London: Serpent's Tail Press.(1986) ‘Radical pedagogy and the politics of student voice’, Interchange17(1): 48–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01811018([Page 164]2000) Stealing Innocence. New York: St Martin's Press.(2004a) The Terror of Neoliberalism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Books.(2004b) ‘Public time versus emergency time: politics, terrorism and the culture of fear’, in The Abandoned Generation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.(2006) Stormy Weather: Katrina and the Politics of Disposability. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Books.(2007) The University in Chains. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Books.(2008) ‘Beyond the biopolitics of disposability: Rethinking neoliberalism in the New Gilded Age’. Social Identities14(5): 587–620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504630802343432(2007) ‘Intergenerational class mobility in contemporary Britain: political concerns and empirical findings’, British Journal of Sociology58(4): 525–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00165.xand (2006) Jade: My Autobiography. London: HarperCollins.(1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.(1998) False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism. London: Granta.(2007) Black Mass. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(1994) Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.and (2009) The Big Squeeze ((2ndedition). New York: Anchor Books.2002) The Money Shot. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(2005) Caught in the Crossfire. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Books.(1994) Volatile Bodies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.(2009) ‘A need to connect’, Financial Times 13 March.(1992) Post-metaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Polity.(2008) ‘Catch-all solution’, The Guardian, Education, 8 January, p. 4.(1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(1990)  ‘Politics and letters’, in T.Eagleton (ed.), Raymond Williams: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 54–66.(1980) Exploring the City. New York: Columbia University Press.(2006) Multitude. Harmondsworth: Penguin.and (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.(2000) Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.(2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity.(1944) The Road to Serfdom. London: George Routledge and Sons.(1949) Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1960) The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1999) How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(1994) Old Age: Decontructions and Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621925(2007) ‘They're micromanaging your every move’, New York Review of Books, 16 August: 42–44.(2008) ‘Variations on the branded self: Theme, invention, improvisation and inventory’ in D.Hesmondhalgh and J.Toynbee (eds) The Media and Social Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 194–210.(2002) ‘Work ethics, soft capitalism and the “turn to life”’, in P. DuGay and M.Pryke (eds), Cultural Economy. London: Sage, pp. 78–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218440(1996) Models of Democracy (([Page 165]2ndedition). Cambridge: Polity.2008) ‘It's a great big toy. Go on, play!’, The Guardian, G2 section, 31 January.(2008) ‘Creative work and emotional labour in the television industry’, Theory Culture & Society25(7–8): 97–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097798and (1985) The Destruction of the European Jews (volume 3). New York: Holmes and Meier.(2004) Reality TV. London: Routledge.(2007) Restyling Factual TV. London: Routledge.(2009) ‘Conclusions’, in J.Hills, T.Sefton and K.Stewart (eds), Towards a More Equal Society?Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 341–360., and (1969) Exit Voice and Loyalty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(1996) Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity.and (1983) The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.(1997) The Time Bind. New York: Metropolitan.(2009) Katrina: A Play of New Orleans. London: Methuen Drama.(1995a) The Fragmented World of the Social. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.(1995b) The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: Polity.(2004) ‘Organised self-realization: some paradoxes of individualization’, European Journal of Social Theory7(4): 463–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368431004046703(2007) Disrespect. Cambridge: Polity.(2008) The Transition Handbook. Totnes: Green Books.(2007) ‘The future of global unions: is solidarity still for ever?’, Dissent, Fall: 62–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dss.2007.0104(2009a) ‘The love of Labour’, The Guardian, 27 January, p. 31.(2009b) ‘High stakes, low finance’, The Guardian, Saturday Review, 2 May.(2007) Listening and Voice ((2ndedition). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.2003) Oprah Winfrey and the Glamor of Misery. New York: Columbia University Press.(2007) Cold Intimacies. Cambridge: Polity.(2008) ‘Theorizing acts of citizenship’, in E.Isin and G.Nielsen (eds), Acts of Citizenship. London: Zed Books, pp. 15–43.(2006) Convergence Culture. New York: New York University Press.(2007) ‘The state has only aided our seasonal spates of thuggery’, The Guardian, 22 August.(2009) ‘In our constipated care culture, thank heavens for the rule benders’, The Guardian 10 February.(2005) ‘The New World Order’, New York Review of Books, 14 July: 14–18.(2008) Networking Futures: The Movements against Corporate Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.(2009) ‘Task no 1 for Barack Obama: reinvent capitalism’, The Times, 22 January.(2009) ‘Collective action across multiple platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, MySpace and YouTube’. Paper presented to Transforming Audiences 2 conference, University of Westminster, September.(2009) ‘Labour's affair with bankers is to blame for this sorry state’, Financial Times, 25/26 April.(2009) The Life and Death of Democracy. New York: Simon & Schuster.(2002) The Civic and Political Health of the Nation: A Generational Portrait. Available at: http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/public_policy_youth_civic_poltiical_health.pdf (last accessed 3 April 2006)., , and ([Page 166]2003) From 9/11 to Terror War. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.(1954 ) The Sickness unto Death. New York: Doubleday.(2000) No Logo. London: Flamingo.(2007) The Shock Doctrine. London: Allen Lane.(2001) ‘Postsocial relations’, in G.Ritzer and B.Smart (eds), The Handbook of Social Theory. London: Sage.(2009) Reality Television and Arab Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814259(1991) Strangers to Ourselves. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(2006) ‘Left behind economics’, New York Times, 14 July.(2009) ‘Saved by Big Government, The Guardian, 11 August.(2000) The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.(2007) Digital Storytelling ((2ndedition). Berkeley, CA: Digital Diner Press.2007) ‘The specter haunting your office’, New York Review of Books, 14 June: 62–65.(2007) A shameful report card’, The Guardian, 14 February.(2009) ‘No turning back’, New Statesman, 9 March: 36–39.and (2005) Happiness: Lessons From a New Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(2009) A Good Childhood. Harmondsworth: Penguin.and (2008a) We-think. London: Profile Books.(2008b) ‘This time it's personal’, The Guardian, Society, 16 January.(2009) ‘State of loneliness’, The Guardian, Society, 1 July 2009: 1–2.(2008) ‘Making it personal’. London: Demos, available at: http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/makingitpersonal (last accessed 28 August 2009)., and (2006) Radical Hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press(2000 ) If This is a Man. London: Everyman's Library.(2005) ‘Preface: the making of a new regulatory order’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598: 6–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272612and (1989) The Listening Self. New York: Routledge.(2005) The Inclusive Society? ((2ndedition). Basingstoke: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/97802305115522004) ‘Making torture legal’, New York Review of Books, 15 July: 4–8.(2001) Market-driven Society. London: Verso.(1925) The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt Brace.(2004) Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.(2009) Radical Consumption. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.(2009) ‘Start cutting from the top’, The Guardian, 26 June.and (2008) ‘Stuck in the middle’, Financial Times, 29 October 2008.(1973) Emile Durkheim. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(Lundby, K. (ed.) (2008) Digital Storytelling, Mediatized Stories. New York: Peter Lang.1998) The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.and (2000) On Identity. New York: Harvill Press.(1981) After Virtue. London: Duckworth.(2009) ‘How we were ruined and what we can do’, New York Review of Books, 12 February: 15–18.(2009) Ethnic Minorities and Digital Technologies. PhD thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo, Oslo.(2002) ‘From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies’, Current Sociology50(3): 407–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050003007([Page 167]2004) Decline of the Public. Cambridge: Polity.(2002) Grammaires de l'Individu. Paris: Gallimard.(1959) Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. London: Lawrence and Wishart.(1973) Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(2002) Parables for the Virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.(1997) The New Public. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520785(2001) On the Postcolony. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.(2004) ‘“Stanley Milgram, Allen Funt, and me”: postwar social science and the “first wave” of reality TV’, in S.Murray and L.Ouellette (eds), Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture. New York: New York University Press, pp. 19–39.(2007) ‘Reality television: a neoliberal theater of suffering’, Social Text25: 93–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01642472-2007-010(2009) I Predict a Riot: A Study of Dissent!'s Media Practices and Political Contention at the 2005 Gleneagles G8 Summit. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science, June.(1999) Struggles for Subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139106870(1998) Mind World and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2008) Against Recognition. Cambridge: Polity.(1997) Back to Reality?Manchester: Manchester University Press.(2005) The Uses of Cultural Studies. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446212318(2009) The Aftermath of Feminism. London: Sage.(1967 ) Mind Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(1996) Challenging Codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520891(1938) ‘Social structure and anomie’, American Sociological Review3: 672–682. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2084686(2002) Media Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.(2008) Cultural Citizenship. Phildelphia, PA: Temple University Press.(1962) The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. Princeton, NJ: Von Norstrand.(1983) Nation State and Economy. New York: New York University Press.(2001) ‘Marginal voices in cyberspace’, New Media & Society3(1): 29–48.(2002) ‘Theorizing cyberspace: the idea of voice applied to internet discourse’, New Media & Society4(4): 479–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146144402321466778and (1986) Space, Text and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1994) A Passion for Difference. Cambridge: Polity.(2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.(1995) Politics in an Anti-political Age. Cambridge: Polity.(2006) Good and Bad Power. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(2008) ‘Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception’, Theory Culture & Society25(7–8): 51–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097796and (1993) On the Edge. New York: Basic Books.(2007) Aversive Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490316(1993) ‘Non-relative virtues: an Aristotelian approach’, in M.Nussbaum and A.Sen (eds), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0019(2008) ‘No one is illegal: between city and nation’, in E.Isin and G.Nielsen (eds), Acts of Citizenship. London: Zed Books, pp. 160–178.(2007) Dreams from My Father. Edinburgh: Canongate.(2009) ‘Listening, pathbuilding and continuations: a research agenda for the analysis of listening’, Continuum23(4): 423–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10304310903056252, and ([Page 168]1998) Memory and Narrative. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(2006) Neoliberalism as Exception. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.(2009) ‘The survivor in contemporary culture and public discourse: a genealogy’, The Communication Review12(2): 132–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714420902921168(2008) Better Living through Reality TV. Malden: Blackwell.and (2002) ‘Big Brother: an experiment in governance’, Television and New Media3(3): 295–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152747640200300305(2009) ‘Myths of neoliberal deregulation’, New Left Review (ns) 57: 67–83.and (2004) The Anatomy of Fascism. New York: Alfred Knopf.(2007) The Geography of Power. London: Pluto Press.(2000) ‘Introduction: what's troubling the trilateral democracies’, in S.Pharr and R.Putnam (eds), Disaffected Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 3–30., and (2009) ‘The justice of a well-functioning capitalism and the reforms that will realize it, not kill it’, http://www.columbia.edu/~esp2/Paris%27NewCapitalism%27Symposium2009Feb26-1.pdf (last accessed 9 March 2009).(2003) ‘Recognition and the struggle for political voice’ in B.Hobson (ed.), Recognition Struggles and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–273.(2005) ‘Transformation scenes: the television interior makeover’, International Journal of Cultural Studies8(2): 213–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367877905052418(1997) History, Experience and Cultural Studies. London: Macmillan.(2009) ‘How fading political will has let the banks off the hook’, Financial Times 27–28 June.(1995) Telling Sexual Stories. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203425268(2003) Intimate Citizenship. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.(1975 ) The Great Transformation. London: Octagon.(2005) NHS plc. London: Verso(2008) ‘Operating profits’, The Guardian, 11 June.(2003) Law, Pragmatism and Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(2006) Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(1997) The Audit Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(‘“Feminist? That's so seventies”: girls and young women discuss femininity and feminism in America's Next Top Model’, in R.Gill and C.Scharf (eds), New Femininities. Basingstoke: Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021875800030139(forthcoming)1993) Sexing the Self. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203167854(1999) The Nazi War on Cancer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(2003) The Experience of Middle Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481628(2009) Working Class Network Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2004) ‘Voice in feminist communication theory’, in L.Rakow (ed.), Feminist Communication Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.and (2006) Hatred of Democracy. London: Verso.(2009) ‘The health reform we need and are not getting’, New York Review of Books, 2 July: 38–40.(1980) ‘Narrative time’, in W.Mitchell (ed.), On Narrative. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 165–86.(1984a) Time and Narrative (volume 1). Chicago: Chicago University Press.([Page 169]1984b) Time and Narrative (volume 2). Chicago: Chicago University Press.(1992) Oneself as Another. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(1995) ‘Reflections on a new ethos for Europe’, Philosophy and Social Criticism21(5/6): 3–13.(2005) The Course of Recognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(1988) Am I that Name?Basingstoke: Macmillan.(2009) ‘Regulating the abject: the TV makeover as site of neoliberal reinvention towards bourgeois femininity’, Feminist Media Studies8(3): 227–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680770802217279and (2008) Mirrors in the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.and (Disrupting Violence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.(forthcoming)2006) Democracy Past and Future. New York: Columbia University Press.(2008) Counter-democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1990) Governing the Soul. London: Free Association Press.(1996a) ‘Governing “advanced” liberal democracies’, in A.Barry, T.Osborne and N.Rose (eds), Foucault and Political Reason. London: UCL Press, pp. 37–64.(1996b) ‘The Death of the social? Reconfiguring the territory of government’, Economy and Society25(3): 327–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000018(1996c) Inventing Our Selves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752179(1999) Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856(2004) No Collar. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.(2008) ‘The new geography of work: power to the precarious?’, Theory Culture, & Society25(7–8): 31–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097795(2001) Economic Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2009) ‘The global financial crisis’, The Monthly February. Available at: http://www.themonthly.com.au/monthly-essays-kevin-rudd-global-financial-crisis-1421?page=0%2C6 (last accessed 4 September 2009).(1993) ‘Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations’, International Organization47(1): 139–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004732(2009) ‘Fear and suspicion are no way to build a good society’, The Guardian, 4 February.(2000) Seeing Voices. New York: Vintage.(2008) Torture Team. London: Allen Lane.(2006) Territory Authority Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.(2009) ‘Health inequalities: a persistent problem’, in J.Hills, T.Sefton and K.Stewart (eds), Towards a More Equal Society?Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 135–156.(1996) Designer Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.(1960) The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.(1992) The Overworked American. New York: Basic Books.(1998) The Good Citizen. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.(1950 ) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy ((3rdedition). New York: Harper & Row.1976) The Joyless Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.(1992) ‘Experience’, in J.Butler and J.Scott (eds), Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge, pp. 22–40.([Page 170]2004) On the Natural History of Destruction. Harmondsworth: Penguin., (2008) ‘Cultural Studies and Giles Deleuze’, in G.Hall and C.Burchall (eds), New Cultural Studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 107–127.(1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.(1987) On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.(1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2002) Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.(2009) ‘Capitalism beyond the crisis’, New York Review of Books, 26 March: 27–30.(1977) The Fall of Public Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1994) The Conscience of the Eye. London: Faber.(1998) The Corrosion of Character. New York: W. W. Norton.(2005) The Culture of the New Capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.(1972) The Hidden Injuries of Class. New York: W. W. Norton.and (2009) ‘Someone to watch over you’, The Guardian, Education, 4 August.(1988) ‘Survey 13: purification of space’, Environment and Planning D6(4): 409–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d060409(1996) Geographies of Exclusion. London: Routledge.(2006) Media and Morality. Cambridge: Polity Press.(1978) The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage.(2008) ‘“Oh Goodness, I am watching reality TV”: how methods make class in audience research’, European Journal of Cultural Studies11(1): 5–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961, and (2009) ‘Where do we go from here?’, Prospect, January, 36: 40.(2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.(2003) Diminished Democracy. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.(1987) The Everyday World as Problematic. Boston: Northwestern Press.(2008) Social Movements for Global Democracy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.(1996) ‘The capitalist threat’, Atlantic Monthly, September.(2008) ‘The financial crisis: an interview with George Soros’, New York Review of Books, 15 May: 7–10.(2009) ‘The game changer’, Financial Times, 29 January: 10.(2007) ‘Reality TV: the Big Brother phenomenon’, International Socialism114. Available online at: http://www.isj.org.uk (last accessed 5 April 2009).(1987) In Other Worlds. London: Methuen.(1986) Landscape for a Good Woman. London: Virago.(2009) ‘Poverty, inequality and child well-being in international context: still bottom of the pack?’, in J.Hills, T.Sefton and K.Stewart (eds), Towards a More Equal Society?Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 267–290.(2006) La Télécratie contre le Démocratie. Paris: Flammarion.(2002) Globalization and its Discontents. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(2005) ‘Correspondence of sentiments: an explanation of the pleasure of social interaction’, in L.Bruni and P.Porta (eds), Economics and Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199286280.003.0004(1985) Victorian Writing and Working Women. Cambridge: Polity.(2009) ‘Participatory content creation: voice, communication, and development’, Development in Practice19(4–5): 573–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09614520902866389, and ([Page 171]1998) Power in Movement ((2ndedition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Tasker, Y. and Negra, D. (eds) (2007) Interrogating Post-Feminism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.1986) ‘Self-interpreting animals’, in Philosophical Papers (volume 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–76.(1989) Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1994) ‘The politics of recognition’, in A.Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–74.(2007) ‘A different kind of courage’, New York Review of Books, 26 April: 4–8.(1995) Between Voice and Silence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., and (2004) Network Citizens. London: Pluto Press.(2008) Nudge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.and (2009) ‘Committed to “performance”: a critical assessment’. Paper presented to conference on Performance, Goldsmiths, University of London, 14 January.(1982) ‘Introduction’, in P.Thompson (ed.), Our Common History. London: Pluto Press, pp. 9–20.(1998) Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.(2006) Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: Chicago University Press.(2007) Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1988) Return of the Actor. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.(2000) Beyond Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.(2005) ‘It is New Labour as much as the public that lacks trust’, The Guardian, 22 November.(2008) Unjust Rewards. London: Granta.and (1995) Strange Multiplicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139170888(2001) ‘The erosion of citizenship’, British Journal of Sociology52(2): 189–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071310120044944(1998) Democracy Realized. London: Verso.(2004) A Grammar of the Multitude. New York: Semiotext(e).(2008) ‘Financial regime change?’, New Left Review (ns) 53: 5–22.(1997) Daddy's Girl. London: Macmillan.(1991) Promotional Culture. London: Sage.(1992) ‘Nihilism in black America’, in G.Dent (ed.), Black Popular Culture. Seattle, WA: Bay Press, pp. 39–53.(1993) Keeping Faith. New York: Routledge.(1990) Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York: W. W. Norton.and (2008) The Spirit Level. London: Allen Lane.and (2005) Descartes: the Project of Pure Enquiry. London: Routledge.(2010) After the News: Changing Media Regimes and the Future of American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.and (1958) Culture and Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(1961) The Long Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.(1979) Politics and Letters. London: New Left Books.(1989) ‘The future of Cultural Studies’, in The Politics of Modernism. London: Verso, pp. 151–162.(1990) Common Culture. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.([Page 172]2010) Carnegie UK Inquiry into Civil Society and Media in UK and Ireland: Protecting the News: Civil Society and the Media. http://democracy.carnegieuktrust.org.uk/civil_society/publications/protecting_the_news.pdf, and (1958) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.(2009) ‘Credibility is key to policy success’, Financial Times, 3 April.(2003) ‘Inverted totalitarianism’, The Nation, 19 May.(1984) The Thread of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(2008) ‘Spectacularmorality: “reality” television, individualization and the remaking of the working class’, in D.Hesmondhalgh and J.Toynbee (eds), The Media and Social Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 177–193.and (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(2009) ‘Extended liveness and eventfulness in multi-platform reality formats’, New Media & Society11(4): 467–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444809102955(2005) ‘Happiness and individualism: a very difficult union’, in L.Bruni and P.Porta (eds), Economics and Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 467–485.(