Understanding Reading Development

Books

Colin Harrison

  • Citations
  • Add to My List
  • Text Size

  • Chapters
  • Front Matter
  • Back Matter
  • Subject Index
  • Dedication

    For Mary

    Copyright

    View Copyright Page

    Acknowledgments

    The co-authors named in Chapters 3, 5 and 6 each contributed significantly to a key section of the chapter that bears their name. John Perry undertook the latent semantic analysis study reported in Chapter 3, although I reworked the data and reran the LSA analyses before writing that part of the text. Geraldine Kotsis was kind enough to send me a folder of material containing information on 17 DARTs activities that she taught in an inner-city primary school in Glasgow, and upon which I draw in Chapter 5. Alan Dewar and Steve Willshaw were both courageous enough to permit me to team teach with them in secondary English lessons in their schools, and Chapter 6 includes extracts from recordings made during or, in one case, following those lessons. I am and shall remain deeply grateful to these exceptional teachers and to their students for the insights they shared and the opportunities they offered me to reflect on reading development processes in action.

    Note: Every effort has been made to contact the publishers of Figure 1.1 for permission to use the photograph. We apologise for any inconvenience or offence caused by the use of this image.

    The Author

    Colin Harrison is Professor of Literacy in Educaton at the University of Nottingham.

    After teaching English at secondary level he worked on the Schools Council project ‘The Effective Use of Reading’, during which time he chaired the Schools Council's Evaluator's Group. His books include Readability in the Classroom, Interactive Learning and New Technologies and The Reading for Real Handbook. He was a founding editor of the Journal of Research in Reading and is past president of the United Kingdom Reading Association, representing UKRA and other European reading associations on the International Reading Association's Family Literacy Commission. He has directed thirty funded research projects, including nine in the field of new technology.

  • References

    AEA (2003) American Evaluation Association Position Statement on High Stakes Testing in PreK-12 Education. Available at: http://www.eval.org/hst3.htm.
    Alexander, P.A. and Jetton, T.L. (2000) ‘Learning from text: a multidimensional and developmental perspective’, in Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D. and Barr, R. (eds), Handbook of Reading Research: Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Armbruster, B.B. (1984) ‘The problem of “inconsiderate texts”’, in Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R. and Mason, J. (eds), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. White Plains, NY: Longman, pp. 202–17.
    Armbruster, B.B. (1996) ‘Schema theory and the design of content-area textbooks’, Educational Psychologist, 21, 253–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2104_2
    Armitage, R. and Armitage, D. (1989) The Lighthouse Keeper's Lunch, Storytime Giants series. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
    Bakhtin, M. (1973) Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, trans. R.W.Rotsel. Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.
    Bartlett, F.C. (1931) Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    BBC (2003) ‘Tests “cause infants stress”’, BBC News online, 25 April 2003. Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/2975529.stm.
    Beard, R.F. (1999) National Literacy Strategy: Review of Research and other Related Evidence. London: Department for Education and Employment.
    Beard, R.F. (2000) ‘Long overdue? Another look at the National Literacy Strategy’, Journal of Research in Reading, 23(3), 245–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00120
    Becta (2001) lmpaCT2 – The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Pupil Learning and Attainment. Coventry: Becta. Available: http://www.becta.org.uk/research/reports/impact2/index.cfm.
    Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1987) The Psychology of Written Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Bettelheim, B. (1989) The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales. New York: Vintage Books.
    Bettleheim, B. and Zelan, K. (1981) On Learning to Read. London: Thames & Hudson.
    Bransford, J.D. and Johnson, M.K. (1972) ‘Contextual prerequisites for understanding: some investigators of comprehension and recall’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2872%2980006-9
    Brooks, G. (1997) Trends in Standards of Literacy in the United Kingdom, 1948–1996. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of York, September.
    Bruner, J. (2000) ‘Reading for possible worlds’, in Shanahan, T. and Rodriguez-Brown, F.V. (eds), 49th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
    Bryant, P.E., Bradley, L., MacLean, M. and Crossland, J. (1989) ‘Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading’, Journal of Child Language, 16, 407–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010485
    Burkard, T. (1999) The End of Illiteracy? The Discovery of the Holy Grail at Clackmannanshire. London: Centre for Policy Studies.
    Calasso, R. (1999) Ka, trans. T.Parks. London: Vintage
    Cazden, C. (2000) ‘Four innovative programmes: a postscript from Alice Springs’, in Cope, W. and Kalantzis, M. (eds), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge, pp. 321–32.
    Centre for Policy Studies (2002) Mission Statement. CPS homepage, at http://www.cps.org.uk/start.htm, accessed 30 October 2002.
    Clark, M.M. (1976) Young Fluent Readers. London: Heinemann Educational.
    Clay, M.M. (1979) The Early Detection of Reading Difficulties. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Educational, for Octopus Publishing.
    Cronbach, L.J., Linn, R.L., Brennan, R.L. and Haertel, E.H. (1997) ‘Generalizability analysis for performance assessments of student achievement or school effectiveness’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(3), 373–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057003001
    Daiute, C. (2000) ‘Writing and communication technologies’, in Indrisano, R. and Squire, J.R. (eds), Perspectives on Writing: Research, Theory, and Practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Available: http://www.readingonline.org/past/ast_index.asp?HREF=../research/daiute_excerpt/index.html.
    Davidson, J., Elcock, J. and Noyes, P. (1996) ‘A preliminary study of the effect of computer-assisted practice on reading attainment’, Journal of Research in Reading, 19(2), 102–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1996.tb00091.x
    Davies, F. and Greene, T. (1984) Reading for Learning in the Sciences. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
    Davis, F.B. (1942) ‘Two new measures of reading ability’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 365–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0053582
    Derrida, J. (1976) Of Grammatology, trans. G.C.Spivac. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    DES (1975) The Bullock Report. London: HMSO.
    Dole, J.A., Sloan, C. and Trathen, W. (1995) ‘Teaching vocabulary within the context of literature’, Journal of Reading, 38(6), 452–60.
    Dostoyevsky, F. (1880/1958)The Brothers Karamazov, trans. DavidMagarshack. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    DrSeuss (1957/1985) The Cat in the Hat. New York: Random House.
    DrSeuss (1962) Green Eggs and Ham. New York: Random House.
    Duffy, G.G. and Roehler, L.R. (1989) ‘Why strategy instruction is so difficult and what we need to do about it’, in McCormick, C.B., Miller, G. and Pressley, M. (eds), Cognitive Strategy Research: From Basic Research to Educational Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 133–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8838-8_6
    Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R. (and eight co-authors) (1987) ‘Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies’, Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747973
    Eagleton, T. (1983) Literary Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    EDinfo (2002) E-mail communication, subject line ‘Scientifically Based Research: Seminar Transcript’. Source: Kirk Winters, EDinfo; US Department of Education, 4 March 2002.
    Elmore, R. (2002) ‘Testing trap: the single largest – and possibly most destructive – federal intrusion into America's public schools’, Harvard Magazine, September-October 2002. Available: http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/0902140.html.
    Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A. (1993) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. London: MIT Press.
    Fairclough, N. (ed.) (1992) ‘Introduction’, in Fairclough, N. (ed.), Critical Language Awareness. Harlow, Essex: Longman, pp. 1–29.
    Flaubert, G. (1857/1974) ‘Letter to Mlle de Chantepie, June 1857’, in Oeuvres complètes de Gustave Flaubert, Tome 13: Correspondance 1850–1859. Paris: Club de l'Honêtte Homme, p. 88.
    Flower, L. (1994) ‘Literate acts’, in The Construction of Negotiated Meaning. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W. and Landauer, T.K. (1998) ‘The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis’, Discourse Processes, 25, 285–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545029
    Foucault, M. (1977) Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings (1972–1977). New York: Pantheon Books.
    France Diplomatie (2000) ‘The power of books’, interview with Daniel Pennac. At: http://www.france.diplomatie.fr/label_france/ENGLISH/DOSSIER/2000bis/11pouvoir.html. Accessed 24 October 2002.
    Freiré, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury.
    Fullan, M. (2000) ‘The return of large scale reform’, Journal of Educational Change, 1, 15–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010068703786
    Goldman, S. and Rakestraw, J. (2000) ‘Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text’, in Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D. and Barr, R. (eds), Handbook of Reading Research: Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Goodman, K. (1970) ‘Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game’, in Singer, H. and Ruddell, R.B. (eds), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Goswami, U. (1999) ‘Causal connections in beginning reading: the importance of rhyme’, Journal of Research in Reading, 22(3), 217–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00087
    Goswami, U. (2002) ‘Rhymes, phonemes and learning to read: interpreting recent research’, in Cook, M. (ed.), Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Phonics. Royston, Herts: United Kingdom Reading Association.
    Goswami, U. and Bryant, P. (1990) Phonological Skills and Learning to Read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Hall, C. and Coles, M. (1999) Children's Reading Choices. London: Routledge.
    Hardy, B. (1977) ‘Narrative as a primary act of mind’, in Barton, G., Meek, M. and Warlow, A. (eds), The Cool Web: The Pattern of Children's Reading. London: Bodley Head.
    Harrison, C. (1995) ‘The assessment of response to reading: developing a post-modern perspective’, in Goodwyn, A. (ed.), English and Ability. London: David Fulton, pp. 66–89.
    Harrison, C. (1996) ‘Methods of teaching reading: key issues in research and implications for practice’, Interchange 39. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Education and Industry Department.
    Harrison, C. (1998) ‘Improving literacy at Key Stage 3: policy, practice and evaluation’, Reading, 33(1), 41–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.00107
    Harrison, C. (1999) Is it feasible to attempt to base a national literacy strategy on research evidence? A report on the implementation of the National Literacy Strategy in England. Presentation given to the National Reading Conference, Orlando, Florida, 1 December.
    Harrison, C. (2001) What does research tell us about how to develop comprehension? Presentation to ESRC Seminar, University of Nottingham, May.
    Harrison, C. (2002a) Key Stage 3 English: Roots and Research. London: DfES.
    Harrison, C. (2002b) Key Stage 3 English: Roots and Research [electronic version]. London, DfES. Retrieved 11 March 2003 from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/midbins/keystage3/Roots%20and%20Research.PDF.
    Harrison, C. (2003) ‘Media analysis and the events of September 11th 2001’, in Vogt, M.E. and Shearer, B.A. (eds), Reading Specialists in the Real World: A Sociocultural View. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Harrison, C. and Coles, M. (eds) (1992/2002) The Reading for Real Handbook. London: Routledge.
    Harrison, C. and Gough, P. (1996) ‘Compellingness in reading research’, Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 334–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.3.6
    Harrison, C., Bailey, M. and Dewar, A. (1998) ‘Responsive reading assessment: is postmodern assessment possible?’, in Harrison, C. and Salinger, T. (eds), Assessing Reading 1: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 1–20.
    Harrison, C., Bailey, M. and Foster, C. (1998) ‘Responsive assessment of reading’, in Coles, M. and Jenkins, R. (eds), Assessing Reading 2: Changing Practice in Classrooms. London: Routledge, pp. 101–22.
    Hayward, L. and Spenser, E. (1998) ‘Taking a closer look: a Scottish perspective on reading assessment’, in Harrison, C. and Salinger, T. (eds), Assessing Reading 1: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 136–51.
    Hellman, C. (1992) Implicitness in Discourse. Uppsala: International Tryck AB.
    Hobsbaum, A. and Leon, A. (1999) Catalyst for Change: The Impact of Reading Recovery in the United Kingdom, Viewpoint 10, University of London Institute of Education.
    Illich, I. (1988) ABC: The Alphabetization of the Popular Mind. New York: Vintage,
    Illich, I. (1993) In the Vineyard of the Text. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Inkpen, M. (1995a) Wibbly Pig is Upset. London: Hodder Children's Books.
    Inkpen, M. (1995b) Wibbly Pig Likes Bananas. London: Hodder Children's Books.
    Iser, W. (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Jacob, B.A. and Levitt, S.D. (2001) Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating. Available at: http://economics.uchicago.edu/download/teachercheat61.pdf.
    Jensen, E. (1998) Teaching with the Brain in Mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Johnson, K., Adamson, S. and Williams, G. (1994) Spotlight Science 8. Cheltenham: Stanley Thorn es.
    Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. (1985) The Psychology of Reading and Language Comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D. and Barr, R. (2000) Handbook of Reading Research: Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Kibby, M.W. and Scott, L. (2002) ‘Using computer simulations to teach decision making in reading diagnostic assessment for re-mediation’, Reading Online, 6(3). Available: http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=kibby/index.html.
    Kintsch, W. (1988) ‘The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model’, Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
    Kintsch, W. (1998) Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Kintsch, E. and Kintsch, W. (1995) ‘Strategies to promote active learning from text: individual differences in background knowledge’, Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 141–51.
    Kintsch, W., Patel, V. and Ericsson, K.A. (1999) ‘The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension’, Psychologia, 42(4), 186–98.
    Kohlers, P. (1968) ‘Reading is only incidentally visual’, in Goodman, K.S. and Fleming, J.T. (eds), Psycholinguistics and the Teaching of Reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Kress, G. (2000) ‘Design and transformation: new theories of meaning’, in Cope, W. and Kalantzis, M. (eds), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge, pp. 153–61.
    Landauer, T.K. (2002) ‘On the computational basis of learning and cognition: arguments from LSA’, in Ross, N. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 43–84: http://lsa.colorado.edu/papers/Ross-final-submit.pdf. Site constructed 1998; accessed 22 November 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421%2802%2980004-4
    Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S.T. (1997) ‘A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge’, Psychological Review, 104, 211–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
    Langer, J.A. (1981) ‘From theory to practice: a pre-reading plan’, Journal of Reading, 25(2), 152–6.
    Langer, J.A. and Nicolich, M. (1981) ‘Prior knowledge and its effect on comprehension’, Journal of Reading Behavior, 13(4), 373–81.
    Latent Semantic Analysis (2002) http://lsa.colorado.edu/. Site constructed October 1998; accessed 1–10 April 2002.
    Lewis, M., Fisher, R., Grainger, T., Harrison, C. and Hulme, P. (2000) Curiosity Kits: The Impact of Non-fiction Book Bags on Children's Reading at Home. Slough: NFER, Topic 25, Spring 2000, pp. 1–6.
    Lord, A.B. (1982) ‘Oral poetry in Yugoslavia’, in Neisser, U. (ed.), Memory Observed. San Francisco: Freeman, pp. 243–57.
    Lunzer, E.A. and Gardner, K. (1979) The Effective Use of Reading. London: Heinemann.
    Lunzer, E.A. and Gardner, K. (1984) Learning From the Written Word. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
    Lyotard, Jean-François (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    McArthur, T. (ed.) (1992) The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    McKee, D. (1980) Not Now, Bernard. London: Andersen Press.
    Mandler, J.M. and Johnson, N.S. (1977) ‘Remembrance of things parsed: story structure and recall’, Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2877%2990006-8
    Manguel, A. (1996) A History of Reading. New York: Viking.
    Markman, E.M. (1978) ‘Realizing that you don't understand: a preliminary investigation’, Child Development, 48, 986–92.
    Markman, E.M. (1979) ‘Realizing that you don't understand: elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies’, Child Development, 50(3), 643–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1128929
    Marshall, N. and Glock, M. (1978–79) ‘Comprehension of connected discourse: a study into the relationships between structure of text and information recalled’, Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 10–56.
    Mayer, R.E. (1992) ‘Cognition and instruction: their historic meeting within educational psychology’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 405–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.405
    Medvedev, P.N. and Bakhtin, M. (1978) The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship, trans. A.J.Wehrle. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Medwell, J., Wray, D., Poulson, L. and Fox, R. (1998) Effective Teachers of Literacy. Exeter: University of Exeter School of Education.
    Meek, M. (1988) How Texts Teach What Readers Learn. Stroud: Thimble Press.
    Meyer, B.J.F. (1975) The Organisation of Prose and its Effects on Memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Morrell, E. (2002) ‘Toward a critical pedagogy of popular culture: literacy development among urban youth’, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46(1). Available: http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=/newliteracies/jaal/9-02_column/index.html.
    Morrison, C., Harris, A.J. and Auerbach, I.T. (1969) ‘Staff after-effects of participation in a reading research project: a follow-up study of the craft project’, Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 366–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747145
    Mulgan, G. (2001) Analysis: Unreliable Evidence? Transcript of a recorded BBC Radio 4 Current Affairs documentary. Broadcast date: 26 July 2001 Quotation from transcript downloaded on 5 August 2001 from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/audiovideo/programmes/analysis/newsid_1470000/1470519.stm
    National Reading Panel (2000a) Report of the National Reading Panel: Reports of the Subgroups. Washington DC: National Development Clearinghouse.
    National Reading Panel (2000b) Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, NIH Pub. No. 00-4769. Available at: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm.
    Neisser, U. (ed.) (1982) Memory Observed. San Francisco: Freeman.
    New London Group (1996) ‘A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures’, Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
    Ogle, L., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., Roey, S., and Williams, T. (2003) International Comparisons in Fourth-Grade Reading Literacy: Findings from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) of 2001 (US Department of Education, NCES 2003–073). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
    Olson, L. (2002) ‘Idaho to adopt “adaptive” online state testing’, Education Week, 23 January, 21/19, pp. 6–7.
    Palinscar, A.S. and Brown, A.L. (1984) ‘Reciprocal teaching of comprehension – fostering and comprehension – monitoring activity’, Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
    Palmer, S. (2000) http://www.standards.dfee.gov.uk/literacy/prof_dev/?pd=ssm; site accessed 12 April 2002.
    Pennac, D. (1992) Reads Like a Novel, trans. DanielGunn.London: Quartet Books.
    Pichert, J.W. and Anderson, R.C. (1977) ‘Taking different perspectives on story’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.4.309
    Pressley, M. (2000) ‘What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of?’, in Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D. and Barr, R. (eds), Handbook of Reading Research: Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 545–62.
    Proust, M. (1905/1994) On Reading. New York: Penguin Books.
    Rayner, K. (ed.) (1983) Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes. New York: Academic Press.
    Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. (1989) The Psychology of Reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International.
    Reed, K. (1999) ‘Reading strategies for “inconsiderate” texts’. Web-posted essay, University of Colorado at Denver (Summer, 1999). Accessed 21 October 2002: http://www.gollihar.com/cognition/critiques/reed99.htm.
    Reinking, D. and Rickman, S.S. (1990) ‘The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers’, Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(4), 395–411.
    Reyna, V. (2002a) What Is Scientifically Based Evidence? What Is Its Logic? Transcript of presentation to US Department of Education seminar on Scientifically Based Research, 6 February 2002. Accessed 9 November 2002 at: http://www.ed.gov/nclb/research/reyna.html.
    Reyna, V. (2002b) What Is Scientifically Based Evidence? What Is Its Logic? Contribution submitted to US Department of Education seminar on Scientifically Based Research, 6 February 2002. Accessed 9 November 2002 at: http://www.ed.gov/nclb/research/reyna-paper.html.
    Rhodes, L.K. and Dudley-Marling, C. (1996) Readers and Writers with a Difference. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Robbins, C. and Ehri, L.C. (1994) ‘Reading storybooks to kindergartners helps them learn new vocabulary words’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 54–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.54
    Ruddell, M.R. (1994) ‘Vocabulary knowledge and comprehension: a comprehension-process view of complex literacy relationships’, in Ruddell, R.B., Ruddell, M.R. and Singer, H. (eds), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading,
    4th edn
    . Newark, DE: International Reading Association, pp. 414–47.
    Rumelhart, D.E. (1975) ‘Notes on a schema for stories’, in Bobrow, D.G. and Collins, A. (eds), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press, pp. 211–36.
    Salinger, T. (1998) ‘Consequential validity of an early literacy portfolio: the “backwash” of reform’, in Harrison, C. and Salinger, T. (eds), Assessing Reading 1: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 182–203.
    Schallert, D.L. (1982) ‘The significance of knowledge: a synthesis of research related to schema theory’, in Otto, W. and White, S. (eds), Reading Expository Material. New York: Academic.
    Schank, R. (1982) Dynamic Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Smith, F. (1971) Understanding Reading. New York: Holt, Reinhart Winston.
    Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S. and Griffin, P. (eds) (1998a) Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
    Snow, C.E., Burns, S. and Griffin, P. (eds) (1998b) Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (Online version of Executive Summary accessed 23 October 2002 at: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/prdyc/execsumm.html.)
    Sparks, D. (2003) ‘Interview with Michael Fullan: change agent’, Journal of Staff Development, 24(1), Winter. Available at: http://www.nsdc.org/library/jsd/fullan241.html.
    Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J. and Anderson, D.K. (1994) ‘Cognitive flexibility theory: advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains’, in Ruddell, R.B., Ruddell, M.R. and Singer, H. (eds), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading,
    4th edn
    . Newark, DE: International Reading Association, pp. 602–15.
    Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J. and Coulson, R.L. (1992) ‘Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains’, in Duffy, T. and Jonassen, D. (eds), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Stallings, J. and Krasavage, E.M. (1986) ‘Program implementation and student achievement in a four-year Madeline Hunter follow-through project’, Elementary School Journal, 87(2) 117–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461483
    Stanovich, K. (1980) ‘Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency’, Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747348
    Stanovich, K. (1986) ‘Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy’, Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
    Taylor, D. and Strickland, D. (1986) Family Storybook Reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational.
    Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., Clark, K.F. and Walpole, S. (1999) Beating the Odds in Teaching All Children to Read, CIERA Report No. 2–006. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, University of Michigan. (Based on a presentation to the International Reading Association Annual Convention, Orlando, 1998.)
    Thorndyke, P.W. (1977) ‘Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse’, Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2877%2990005-6
    Tyrrell, J. (2001) The Power of Fantasy in Early Learning. London: Routledge-Falmer.
    US Department of Education (2002) Scientifically Based Research. Transcript of seminar accessed 9 November 2002 at: http://www.ed.gov/nclb/research/.
    Valencia, S. and Wixon, K. (2000) ‘Policy-oriented research on literacy standards and assessment’, in Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D. and Barr, R. (eds), Handbook of Reading Research: Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 909–35.
    Vincent, D. and Harrison, C. (1998) ‘Curriculum-based assessment of reading in England and Wales’, in Harrison, C. and Salinger, T. (eds), Assessing Reading 1: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 122–35.
    Vygotsky, L.S. (1986) Thought and Language, revised edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Waddell, M. and Benson, P. (illustrator) (1994) Owl Babies. London: Walker Books.
    Wade, S. and Moje, E. (2000) ‘The role of text in classroom learning’, in Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D. and Barr, R. (eds), Handbook of Reading Research: Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Waterland, E. (1985) Read With Me: An Apprenticeship Approach to Reading. Stroud: Thimble Press.
    Watson, J.E. and Johnston, R.S. (1998) Interchange 5: Accelerating Reading Attainment – The Effectiveness of Synthetic Phonics. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. Accessed 30 October 2002 at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library/documents7/interchg.pdf.
    Whitehead, F. (1975) Children's Reading Interests. London: Evans/Methuen Educational for the Schools Council.
    Willis, P. (1997) Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Westmead, England: Saxon House.
    Wood, D. and Middleton, D. (1975) ‘A study of assisted problem solving’, British Journal of Psychology, 66, 181–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01454.x
    Wood, D., Bruner, J. and Ross, G. (1976) ‘The role of tutoring in problem solving’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
    Wray, D. and Lewis, M. (eds) (2000) Literacy in the Secondary School. London: David Fulton.
    Yin, R.K. (1994) Case Study Research Design and Methods. London: Sage, p. 1.
    Young, M.F.D. (1971) Knowledge and Control. London: Macmillan.

    • Loading...
Back to Top

Copy and paste the following HTML into your website